Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Recollections May Vary: Part XI

As Sophie Wessex made clear in her (undoubtedly Palace greenlit) interview in the Telegraph.

Charles and the Queen can try all they like to pour oil on these waters through the Platinum Jubilee next year. The younger folk who are the monarchy's future will never accept the two traitorous vipers back.

Best to make the Jubilee the clean break.

by Anonymousreply 12621 hours ago

How did she make it clear? I read nothing definitive. They made a joke a wiggle out of the Oprah question. That was the worst of it.

by Anonymousreply 106/05/2021

I can't seem to find Part X. On my phone, it keeps coming up as closed, so opening Part XI.

So now that the primary threads on Harry Goes Native in California and Sussex Baby arrives are full and closed, here we are.

With the Harkles unable to avoid looking bad even with s simple baby name announcement. It is mind boggling that they are either so bad at reading the room or so obsessed with revenge that they fick up even this.

Backlash stories are everywhere, openly calling the name variously, exploitative pandering, hypocritical, or outright insulting.

Then there are the She's Having Harry to Lunch! stories. (For lunch, more like.) And the Queen has already met the baby via Zoom, the Sussexes will all go to England for the Jubilee (does Meghan know she stands no chance at all of appearing on that balcony?), although I think they'll be there this summer to see that they get great christening ops with the Archbishop of Canterbury.

Meghan's book is published today. Will it fly off the shelves or bomb?

Enquiring minds want to know.

by Anonymousreply 206/08/2021

I believe the Sussexes DID ask QEII for permission to use the name Lilibet.

by Anonymousreply 306/08/2021

Believe what you want R3.....there have been several reports saying that they didn’t.

by Anonymousreply 406/08/2021

I think it’s a little bit of both. I think they told the Queen ahead of time so she wouldn’t be blindsided, but didn’t really ASK her if they could. Meghan doesn’t ask for permission (or apologize).

by Anonymousreply 506/08/2021

R2. Thanks. Your enquiring minds addition at the end of your comment just identified which troll group is currently working the gossip sites. It's a signature so to speak. Naughty naughty.

by Anonymousreply 606/08/2021

Agree with R5. They get off on ignoring tradition and breaking unspoken rules.

by Anonymousreply 706/08/2021

R7 The unspoken rules of White supremacy? Interesting gossip. Amazon had to change review status for Meghan's book. Troll reviews overwhelmed site. Black twitter noticed this coincided with positive Kate book negative Meghan book articles in UK media. The troll comments are now being individually investigated. One by one.

by Anonymousreply 806/08/2021

[quote] The troll comments are now being individually investigated. One by one.

You’re the stupidest cunt I’ve seen on DL in almost 20 years.

by Anonymousreply 906/08/2021

Maybe they ran Lilibet specifically by The Queen although I doubt it. Probably insinuated it would be Elizabeth or another variation. But baby names bring out weird tendencies in narcs. My dad’s mother was known to everyone as Kit, a nickname. My narcissistic mother naturally hated my grandmother. When my sister was born, my mom made her middle name Kit. However, she went around making clear to everyone that the middle name had no relation to my grandmother, she had always liked the name and was going to use it regardless of it being my grandmother’s nickname. ??? Even as a kid I knew it was off.

by Anonymousreply 1006/08/2021

R8 How is the name being received in your corner of the world? Heh.

by Anonymousreply 1106/08/2021

R8 - Hi, Pet. Aren't you tired of trying this bullshit tactic yet? It never works, nobody cares, nobody is investigating, nobody is going to the Gulag, and you just look like the poster illustration of what Freud described as crazy: trying the same thing over and over again but expecting a different result.

Meanwhile, the critics of the broadsheets aren't trolls and the book is getting slammed across the board for being semi-literate (that means badly written by someone with no command of the English language, Sweetie), clearly a vanity project, and being nothing that any child would really be interested in.

Those are the reviews that count, darling, and they're bad, because Meghan has even less talent as a writer (her word salad pronouncements should have been a clue) than she did as an actress. And the sales are less than hoped for and the book is already being offered at a discount . . .

Whilst Kate's book, you poor benighted sod, went to the top of the best-seller lists, sold fantastically, and the profits are shared with a mental health charity and the National Portrait Gallery.

You know why? Because Kate wisely got involved in a book project on a subject that she has some knowledge of, and made it about the project, NOT ABOUT HER.

Meghan, on the other hand, has zero skill as a writer and made the book ALL ABOUT HER AND HER HUSBAND AND HER SON.

Fuck off, Pet. Peekaboo, we see you!

by Anonymousreply 1206/08/2021

Nothing these two state about the Queen or that their PR leaks say about the Queen should be taken with anything but a huge bucket of salt.

You have to remember that they KNOW they can say anything and the Queen is unlikely to come out and contradict the story. Maybe he called, maybe he didn't. Maybe they zoomed, maybe they didn't. They clearly have no regard for the truth and if they did call her and did Zoom, they are yet again proving that they have absolutely no compunction about sharing private moments with the BRF with the world if it gets them PR.

Given that, I would say it's highly likely that everyone in the BRF is on Red Alert about holding communications with the Harkles.

The media make up shit when no one in any position to know what goes on between the Queen and Harry would give them the time of day.

Now, word is that Harry is going to fly in and fly out for the Diana Statue Unveiling. That should give him and Gran time for a quick lunch, eh?

The Harkles never, ever fail to forget to think things through.

After seeing the backlash against two people who threw an entire family, including its Head, under the bus but naming their kid after her because she's IMPORTANT and his mother, another rich white royal icon . . . but nothing about her, ah, shall we say "other" family . . .

Someone went through the family tree and found a Great-Great-Aunt Lillie and the Sussex PR machine is trumpeting that see? The name Lilibet DOES honour Meghan's mother's family . . . someone Meghan, her mother, and her grandmother never knew, who means nothing to them, and whom Meghan didn't even know existed . . .

We all know why she called the kid Lilibet: to make it look like she was currying favour whilst also being rude, crude, and vicious to the woman whose generosity gave her everything that grasping bitch has.

by Anonymousreply 1306/08/2021

So other than Ellen (and fhe BRF) have any big names tweeted congrats? Seems like not many 😂

by Anonymousreply 1406/08/2021

We requested private congratulations as we are a very private family.

by Anonymousreply 1506/08/2021

From the linked artucle:

“ So I believe she has earned the right to whatever modicum of privacy she can carve out for herself. Something that doesn't include her grandson's appropriating her childhood nickname, one of the very few private things she possesses.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1606/08/2021

R3 I'm sorry to burst your little bubble, but a Palace source has now told the media that the Harkles did NOT ask the Queen if they could use her intimate family nickname.

The Palace is actually coming out and calling the Sussex PR liars.

This means the gloves really are off, there is no "healing", and the Sussexes have just put their foot in it again.

They've been called out publicly for rank pandering plus disrespect by nearly every outlet on the planet.

Her book has been universally panned and is sinking like a stone.

And they've once again made the Cambridges, and especially Kate and HER book, look fucking golden.

Own goals again.

by Anonymousreply 1706/09/2021

Get your ass over here R17

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1806/09/2021

R18 - Thanks. The arse has moved. But that still doesn't preclude discussing the latest events here, especially given the title of this thread, as, clearly, yet again. - Recollections are once more varying.

by Anonymousreply 1906/09/2021

R12 - See Below:

Later in the day on Tuesday, 08 June 2021, Amazon updated their sales charts and The Bench was #3 on the American Amazon sales list and the #1 children’s book in the US.

by Anonymousreply 2006/09/2021

The book is a PR stunt and vanity project. I can guarantee it will not be an enduring and beloved children’s book. There will not be children asking for it at bedtime every night, like “Good Night, Moon”.

But we all knew that.

by Anonymousreply 2106/09/2021

R20 Meghan has a large group of low IQ fans who would buy wrapped dog shit if it had her name attached. They are the ones buying this book, so of course there’s an initial flurry.

But neutral buyers who actually want readable, fun books for their kids won’t buy it - because it’s monumentally crap.

Paperback sales won’t soar because by then anyone wbo wanted it because the cunt’s name is on it will already have it.

Whether you like it or not, this book will go down in history as one of the worst ever published. So fuck off back to are not welcome here, Maria.

by Anonymousreply 2206/09/2021

This whole fiasco over Meghan books and the name of The Sussexes new daughter is about nothing except the British tabloids and other British media monetizing the Sussexes (and by extension the British Royal family) for every dollar and pound of revenue they can squeeze out

by Anonymousreply 2306/09/2021

Sure R23. Sure.

Because it’s not like that gaping cunt of a woman you so admire isn’t squeezing every penny she can out of an entirely unearned title and platform GIFTED to her by the BRF and UK.

Sling your saggy tits over your shoulder and piss off.

by Anonymousreply 2406/09/2021

R22 - You have the cart before the horse: those terrible reviews are what persuaded her fans to buy. She can't write, they can't read.

The reviews are horrendous, the people buying them are blacks who want to support a Sistah even though the kids in the illustrations (that is, the ones representing her own kids) show pasty red-headed kids no one would ever mistake for the kids of the people buying the book out of, er, solidarity.

It will sink quickly - just like "Finding Freedom" did.

by Anonymousreply 2506/09/2021

The book spent 5 minutes at #3 and, predictably, started downward the next day. Last time I checked, it had already sunk to 40.

by Anonymousreply 2606/11/2021

R26 - Will be interesting to see aggregate numbers on Meghan's book after 3 months.

by Anonymousreply 2706/11/2021

That 3 on the Amazon list counts clicks on the page, not purchases, so doesn't actually mean anything. Plus, its been announced Meghan will be giving 2000 copies free to schools. (Wonder who covered the cost of that? Archewell?).

by Anonymousreply 2806/11/2021

The Royal Family has arrived at the G7 summit.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 2906/11/2021

Part X has been paywalled - so we already have a Part XI running.

Recollections aren't going to be varied any longer: if this article in the DM is true, Harry and Meghan will no longer be able to spout their "truths" without the Palace making it clear that there are other truths out there, as well.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 30Last Saturday at 5:24 PM

Ohhhhh, the Palace now has the Harkles on the run!

This piece fools nobody: it's a frantic attempt to get in front of the fact that they've been exposed as liars not once, but twice in the last week, and that their brand may be in danger.

The Queen waited until the right moment: Philip's death and mourning past, and a couple of egregious lies added to the pile already lying at the feet of the Harkles.

They've made her case for her with the latest foolish overreach on their parts. If she takes the tiles now, it will be much, much harder to make the case for it being based on racism, that card has gotten more and more dog-eared - especially after they named their daughter after two rich white blue-eyed royal icons and ignored Meghan's black heritage.

Can't wait to see how this plays out.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 31Last Sunday at 4:56 AM

Oprah, having gotten what she wanted, remains silent.

by Anonymousreply 32Last Sunday at 6:20 AM

“If you were concerned about racism within the royal family and the institution of the monarchy itself, why would you then name your child after its two most iconic members?” - The simplest of questions for Harry and Meghan, which neither Oprah nor any other “journalist” will ever ask.

by Anonymousreply 33Last Sunday at 6:26 AM

Narcs never change. The BRF refusing to enable them and grey rocking is the best strategy.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 34Last Sunday at 6:53 AM

One Part X was closed, this other part X is still open

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35Last Sunday at 6:55 AM

Let's pause for a moment and send thoughts and prayers to the servants at Manse de Megdusa. With this latest proclamation from Buckingham Palace, the Duchess of Misinformation has got to be livid.

by Anonymousreply 36Last Sunday at 7:08 AM

Rumored next flailing for a brand

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 37Last Sunday at 7:19 AM

^ R37 businesses may shy away from any association

hoorutokin2 👀 watch out... its 🔥🔥🔥 9 hours ago Like it helped a children backpack brand, who’s product was on infamous paparazzi shot? Brand had to delete instagram post, because of negative comments

by Anonymousreply 38Last Sunday at 7:20 AM

HaitchanM Spectator of the Markle Debacle 3 hours ago Agree they are not who you want wearing your brand, simply because they are too divisive. As for the blind item… would that be that they just get other brands to give them items and use their ‘influence’ to get people to buy rather than creating anything themselves? Because if so they’ll struggle unless they work with like a high street brand. They only have so many celeb friends who are influential, have kids and want to be associated and Im going to bet the average Sussex stan isnt going to be able to afford exclusive babywear.

by Anonymousreply 39Last Sunday at 7:23 AM

The Bidens are having tea with the Queen at Windsor today, wonder what family members may also attend?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 40Last Sunday at 7:26 AM

I assume Charles and Camilla will be there, perhaps Anne.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 41Last Sunday at 7:30 AM

Oh dear!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 42Last Sunday at 7:30 AM

What are the odds he sill skip the trip in July?

by Anonymousreply 43Last Sunday at 7:31 AM

Thomas Markle interview on 60 Minutes, Oz

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 44Last Sunday at 7:35 AM

MeGain and Dimbo have alienated the Markles, the Raglands and the BRF. Easier to extort the monetize the relationship with the dead, they are unable to protest narc abuse after all.

willyeetlater wayfair patio furniture 18 minutes ago Yeah it's easier to love a memory of someone than to actually be in a loving relationship with a living person. If someone is alive with their own needs ad desires, you can't so easily curate them to your benefit.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 45Last Sunday at 7:39 AM

I think Harry's attendance at the unveiling is everyone's next question.

In order to keep up the We Want Peace with the BRF narrative alive, he has to show up. If he doesn't, no one will buy the New Baby excuse, it's a one or two day trip, and his wife has a nurse and a nanny.

He can use the excuse to save face, but no one will buy it, and it will show that relations are so bad that he can't even manage a flying visit for a private memorial to Diana with his brother.

I give evens either way. Too close to call.

by Anonymousreply 46Last Sunday at 7:44 AM

It would be surprising if Harry skips the Diana statue unveiling. Being her son is about the only sure thing left that the he and his wife have to monetize.

by Anonymousreply 47Last Sunday at 7:56 AM

If she uses Sussex in the branding dor this subscription service, they will lose the title. No question.

by Anonymousreply 48Last Sunday at 8:20 AM

Beautiful day in Windsor

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 49Last Sunday at 8:26 AM

The Bidens with the Queen.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 50Last Sunday at 8:29 AM

The Queen's experience and knowledge is priceless.

During her 69-year reign, 14 US Presidents have been in office:

- Truman - Eisenhower - Kennedy - Johnson - Nixon - Ford - Carter - Reagan - Bush - Clinton - Bush - Obama - Trump - Biden

HM has met all of these leaders with the exception of President Johnson.

by Anonymousreply 51Last Sunday at 8:31 AM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 52Last Sunday at 8:32 AM

The Queen is pretty in pink

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 53Last Sunday at 8:36 AM

The official photo.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 54Last Sunday at 8:43 AM

Forgot to say that Jill Biden looked fabulous. Her skirt suit looked like sea foam green when I was watching the live feed of the Bidens with the Queen but in the photos above, it looks blue or even lilac.

by Anonymousreply 55Last Sunday at 8:45 AM

How refreshing to have a First Lady who actually wears undergarments.

by Anonymousreply 56Last Sunday at 8:46 AM

The Queen's printed pink outfit

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 57Last Sunday at 8:47 AM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 58Last Sunday at 8:48 AM

Jill Biden has a boo boo. I would hate to be so closely scrutinized in the press for EVERY fucking flaw.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 59Last Sunday at 9:10 AM

R47 - It is so ironic that the parent from whom he probably inherited his mental issues, and who valued his older brother more, should be the parent he idolises. Perhaps monetising her memory is some backwards form of revenge - he's finally getting the attention from her he feels he deserved.

It's a stretch, I know, but . . .

by Anonymousreply 60Last Sunday at 11:58 AM

They were a poor fit as well, R60. Haz has always had issues with rage since he was tiny (runs in Spencer family) and Diana wanted a parentified child to meet HER emotional needs. William was pressed into service there and also to manage Harry's emotional outbursts from childhood on. Charles was the one who seemed to have more patience for Harry. Maybe Harry thinks he can push and push him.

Harry does not behave like someone who has genuine empathy or who values other people and interpersonal relationships, nor does MeGAIN. Such people, whatever label you want to apply, are fundamentally chaotic and anti-social or oppositional. They do not value good character, love, or peace and harmony. Haz in a poorer family may well be in jail or homeless. Books will be written about MeGain. Dark triads both of them. When the elderly man fell off his horse in the heat at Trooping and landed on his head on the pavement, Catherine looked properly horrified. The Gruesome Twosome both laughed. When Charles himself was knocked unconscious playing polo, Harry callously joked about it. She had to be reminded by a press secty to inquire about her father's health when he had just had a heart attack. Not only do they have these reactions to the vulnerability and misfortune of others, almost reacting with glee and excitement, they do not even care to cloak or hide the reactions from public view. They are dangerous and highly disturbed people.

God help those children.

by Anonymousreply 61Last Sunday at 12:09 PM

R61 - It is true about the Spencers, I'd forgotten that. Johnny Spencer beat Diana's mother, Earl Spencer may have calmed down a bit with the third marriage, finally, but he was reputed to be hardly a bed of roses in the first two, especially the first wife, Victoria was it? Diana and her sisters well into their teens when they should have known better pushed Raine Spencer, their father's second wife, down a flight of stairs.

Hated stepmothers are not exactly news, but ffs - if she'd been badly hurt, the story would have followed Diana for years, and their father was allegedly extremely happy with his second wife, even if she was something of an English Nancy Reagan.

Cressida Bonas's IG post the day after Harry's engagement was announced was extremely telling,

"No matter how educated, talented, rich or cool you believe you are, how you treat people ultimately tells it all."

It is impossible to miss her meaning.

by Anonymousreply 62Last Sunday at 12:20 PM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 63Last Sunday at 12:32 PM

Over 10k comments now

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 64Last Sunday at 12:32 PM

LilyTheOpinionator, Philadelphia, United States, 6 hours ago

Taking away their titles won't hamper this soulless couple from trying to cash in. Doing a reality show is definitely in the cards for them, and they'll say they were forced to do so because H was cut off.

Prospero in Exile, This Sceptered Isle, United Kingdom, 6 hours ago

@EleanorOfAquitaine: It's a step in the right direction. But now is the time for "H" to be removed from the line of succession and for all royal titles & privileges to be stripped. It's intolerable that he and his vile wife are able to continue to spew falsehoods regarding Her Majesty, the Queen and the British Royal Family, which undermines the very institution of the Monarchy, and thus, respect for the People of Great Britain & the Commonwealth, who have also been trashed by these two hypocritical grifters, "H" & his ignoble wife who are greedy, jealous and untrustworthy. Pathetic.

by Anonymousreply 65Last Sunday at 12:35 PM

Just imagine how things would be different if this one nut job had had a clear shot at the Queen during the Trooping The Colour in 1981

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 66Last Sunday at 12:42 PM

The Harkles ventured one little response about how they now want a "good relationship" with the royal family (read: their royal title) and to "make peace", but glaringly avoided addressing the fact that the Queen had just branded them as liars in what they told the public and press.

And now they've gone quiet. They will probably, for once wisely, lay low until the unveiling of Diana's statue. Then we'll see the next chapter open.

by Anonymousreply 67Last Monday at 5:03 AM

The rabbit holes are DEEP if the posts here are accurate.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 68Last Monday at 6:02 AM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 69Last Monday at 6:16 AM

More manifesting from Montecito

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 70Last Monday at 6:18 AM

R70 Oh my sides!

The Sussexes are the ones likely to dissolve.

Tbe polls suggest is oblivious to the obvious.

by Anonymousreply 71Last Monday at 8:17 AM

Can't stop, won't stop!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 72Last Monday at 2:52 PM


Being the referee isn’t your job and you’re gonna get burned.

by Anonymousreply 73Last Monday at 3:20 PM

R72 Another "sources claim".

Because savvy, discreet Kate went right out to the press and showed them the text on her phone.


by Anonymousreply 74Last Monday at 4:12 PM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 75Last Monday at 4:47 PM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 76Last Monday at 4:48 PM

“The Sussexes are already way more famous than the Pussycat Dolls. Now they want a fortune bigger than Nicole’s.”

Wow wow wow, from British Royalty to comparing yourselves to the Pussycat Dolls. Oh. My . God.

by Anonymousreply 77Last Monday at 4:52 PM

How are they paying all these people?

by Anonymousreply 78Last Monday at 5:05 PM

Exactly, R78. And if they have "help" with the PR bill, who are their backers and to what end?

by Anonymousreply 79Last Monday at 5:08 PM

What "The Me You Can't See" tells us about Meghan & Harry's relationship | Is it Narcissistic abuse?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 80Last Monday at 5:15 PM

Chrissy Teigen thinks Meghan is wonderful.

She's the darling of the celebrity trash pool.

by Anonymousreply 81Last Tuesday at 1:46 AM

Harry has girly hands with skinny red fingertips. Ew.

by Anonymousreply 82Last Tuesday at 2:42 AM

The Queen received the Australian PM today at Windsor. This woman is amazing!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 83Last Tuesday at 4:16 AM

I think HMQ has been summer dress shopping recently!

by Anonymousreply 84Last Tuesday at 4:55 AM

Royal Ascot opens today - HM missing opening day for only the second time in . . . 69 years. But the Cornwalls, Wessexes, Tindalls, and Pss. Anne showed up.

I absolutely adore Sophie's hat - but not the dress.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 85Last Tuesday at 5:22 AM

Face it: the best dressed person in those photos is the Prince of Wales. That suit could have showed up on its own without anyone in it.

by Anonymousreply 86Last Tuesday at 5:25 AM

Sophie needs a better bra. Her dress looks like a bathrobe.

by Anonymousreply 87Last Tuesday at 5:29 AM

Remember when Markle showed up dressed as a dental nurse?

by Anonymousreply 88Last Tuesday at 5:36 AM

And turned her back to the Queen, R88.

by Anonymousreply 89Last Tuesday at 5:54 AM

Lady C today

Medico on Meghan's Narcissistic control/Harry an ingrate/Thomas Markle perplexed 2 stupefaction

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 90Last Tuesday at 7:04 AM

R90 - Lady C reads an interesting - and I think, accurate - description of Meghan and Harry's relationship by a medical observer in her video. Many of the observer's points have been echoed by many here on DL. Harry The Bewildered is my new name for him.

by Anonymousreply 91Last Tuesday at 9:58 AM

New vid

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 92Last Tuesday at 10:03 AM

Are we prepared for this?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 93Last Tuesday at 1:29 PM

Narkles, take note!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 94Last Tuesday at 1:48 PM

R93 - Harry really looks like Philip in the photo on the right.

by Anonymousreply 95Last Wednesday at 5:26 AM

R94 - Meghan and Harry are not receiving in public funding. I do not get your point.

Unlike other royal houses, there has always been a separation in the Netherlands between what was owned by the state and used by the House of Orange in their offices as monarch, or previously, stadtholder, and the personal investments and private fortune of the House of Orange or Orange-Nassau.

With regards to private funds, the House of Orange-Nassau, which is the Royal House of the Netherlands is one of the wealthiest royal families in the work. Have you ever heard of Royal Dutch Shell? I have no doubt the the Princess of Orange is receiving a large private allowance from her parents or simply sending all her bills to her father, the Dutch King.

Again, What doe this have to do with the Sussexes?

by Anonymousreply 96Last Wednesday at 5:37 AM


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 97Last Wednesday at 2:01 PM

All that hustling and the only gigs were as a suitcase girl that her dad got her and on Suits, which her husband Trevor got her.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 98Last Wednesday at 2:52 PM

What a headline - flops dismally. Seems like she has Markled herself!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 99Last Wednesday at 6:49 PM

Wooton & Lady C, has this been discussed?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 100Last Wednesday at 7:20 PM

Do you have a link to the entire discussion r100?

by Anonymousreply 101Yesterday at 3:39 AM

That is what is on the GBNews YT channel, R100, I would love to see more of the discussion myself.

by Anonymousreply 102Yesterday at 3:49 AM

Yes, r87. Same problem on Day 2. Camilla, too. What is it with royals and good foundation garments? Sophie's to young to be pulling a Mamie Eisenhower look.

by Anonymousreply 103Yesterday at 4:02 AM


"Blind Item #9​

The youngest sibling in the main group of the house of royals has been having an affair for years with a television host. They are both married."

The BI is widely thought to be Prince Edward, and the TV host, Philip Schofield, who came out months ago after a couple of decades in a straight marriage.

But more to the point, the BI is widely thought to have been sent in by the Sussex PR machine, to pay out Sophie Wessex for her "Orpah who?" remark in the Telegraph interview, and also because it is so obvious that the Wessexes are being brought forward to replace the Sussexes.

Rumours about Edward have circulated for decades, unproven, of course.

It's quite typical of Sachs and her clients to try this, and Enty prints whatever he's sent that looks like it will get clicks. The stuff he printed about Cumberbatch's wife and marriage bordered on science fiction.

It won't make a bit of difference. Harry and Meghan are now OUT OUT OUT.

by Anonymousreply 104Yesterday at 4:23 AM

I can't stand Philip Schofield, but yes, this has a whiff of Sunshine Sucks for sure.

by Anonymousreply 105Yesterday at 5:15 AM

That enty site is a vile homophobic racist shit hole. Nobody needs to give it the time of day.

by Anonymousreply 106Yesterday at 5:26 AM

'Scuse me..What is an enty site?

by Anonymousreply 107Yesterday at 5:29 AM

the crazy days and nights gossip site. It is a cess pit for deplorables.

by Anonymousreply 108Yesterday at 5:31 AM

And a great place for SS to even some $$ from the Royal Duo.

by Anonymousreply 109Yesterday at 5:33 AM

From River

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 110Yesterday at 6:11 AM

New Lady C vid

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 111Yesterday at 7:10 AM

R99 - How can Meghan's book be a flop if it is on the New York Times Best Seller List of children's books?

by Anonymousreply 112Yesterday at 7:10 AM

r112, I guess it means a lot of sales on the release day, rapidly followed by nobody wants this crap.

by Anonymousreply 113Yesterday at 7:18 AM

I believe I read that she paid for them to run her miscarriage piece, can $ influence the book list? Surely there are ways to manipulate it.

by Anonymousreply 114Yesterday at 7:26 AM

Rolls eyes at R6 and R8. Probably the same. They love to talk about “people being investigated.” LOL, give it a break. The PC police have no control about speech. At least not in U.S. Give it a rest.

by Anonymousreply 115Yesterday at 7:50 AM

R111 - Lady C. is on fire today. She's not taking any shit from anyone.

by Anonymousreply 116Yesterday at 8:15 AM

R116 - Lady C rants are getting old and stale..

by Anonymousreply 117Yesterday at 8:31 AM

Kate is really into early childhood.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 118a day ago

She clearly loves kids and gets along with them and mothers so well on meet and greets and tours. Why not play up to that strength? It's the most natural way of relating to others through the most basic common experience of 1/2 the population.

I love this British word "broody," BTW.

by Anonymousreply 119a day ago

Oh dear, R119, several posts are missing before yours. Is the KGT trying to get to his posting quota before clocking out?

by Anonymousreply 120a day ago

Has this new campaign been discussed?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 121a day ago

Very important initiative from Catherine

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 122a day ago

Meghan Markle is clinically deranged.

Having seen her book slammed, laughed at, panned, and made the butt of jokes across the Anglosphere, and disappearing into oblivion after her bots, fans, and publisher got it onto the NY TIMES Best Seller list for . . . one day, after which it sank rapidly below 100 and is in the sale bins everywhere . . .

Meghan doubles down, states that the book will really change things and frame "masculinity" in a new way, and thanks her fans for putting it on said Best Seller list.

Meghan and Harry are living in some parallel universe where everything is the opposite of what it is on Planet Earth.

They have a shrine somewhere to the Religion of the Big Lie.

They can't see themselves at all. Not at all.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 123a day ago

She really thought she would last without any current revival lost during Broadway burn up? (Accordions)

Mean and " keep your eyes OFF!" I should just slink off

by Anonymousreply 124a day ago

She was raised in the Agape cult, the founder wrote "The Secret." The effects on her psyche are clear.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 125a day ago

Jealous little fucker, that Haz

“MEGHAN MARKLE and Prince Harry could "make even more headline-grabbing claims against the Royal Family" if Prince William is sent on a US tour to woo Joe Biden, a royal commentator told”

by Anonymousreply 12621 hours ago
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.


Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!