Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

British Royal Family Gossip: Part 64

Please continue our discussion. At the suggestion of one of posters, here is a poll about the Duchess of Sussex' return from maternity leave. Please vote for the likely occasion when she'll be seen again in public again. Keep calm and carry on!

Link to the previous thread

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 602June 2, 2019 2:55 AM

Second ignore.

by Anonymousreply 1May 30, 2019 9:39 PM

Third ignore.

by Anonymousreply 2May 30, 2019 9:54 PM

R1 & R2 = if you're going to be a shitstain, you're blocked.

by Anonymousreply 3May 30, 2019 10:10 PM

Welp welp and fuckity eh.

by Anonymousreply 4May 30, 2019 10:11 PM

Fourth, fifth ignores.

by Anonymousreply 5May 30, 2019 10:13 PM

FF this crap

by Anonymousreply 6May 30, 2019 10:15 PM

What's with the ignores? Go to another thread instead?

by Anonymousreply 7May 30, 2019 10:16 PM

You can't. It no longer works.

by Anonymousreply 8May 30, 2019 10:16 PM

......

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 9May 30, 2019 10:17 PM

From the previous thread.

quote Are you saying that "annoying, grasping and a social climber, but so far there's no evidence she's a criminal" isn't enough?

[quote] How far must we lower our standards, then?

Being annoying, grasping and social climbing are not criminal acts. The original comparison was to Anna Sorkin who defrauded people.

by Anonymousreply 10May 30, 2019 10:17 PM

It does R8. you must have F+F'd two posts today, so ypu are done, love, till your time is up

by Anonymousreply 11May 30, 2019 10:18 PM

I’ve yet to see anyone claim to KNOW that The Harkles aren’t living at Frogmore. But there are those of us who suspect they’re not. I don’t need to prove anything because I’m not a defendant in a court of law. It’s just a hunch (which I admit) on a gossip board.

If you come swinging your “SHOW ME” dick all over the place against idle speculation, be prepared to show yours.

by Anonymousreply 12May 30, 2019 10:20 PM

So many haters.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 13May 30, 2019 10:20 PM

Haters!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 14May 30, 2019 10:22 PM

R12 There's speculation based on existing evidence and then there's wild speculation based on fantasy. The Sussexes don't live at Frogmore is in the realm of fantasy. It's clearly possible, but there's nothing to support it besides the claims of anonymous posters on the internet.

by Anonymousreply 15May 30, 2019 10:23 PM

They are not at that dumpy Dumpy FrogCott. Meghan didn't marry a Prince to live in squalor.

by Anonymousreply 16May 30, 2019 10:26 PM

Suppose we agree with r15 that the Harkles not living in Frogmore Cottage is the realm of fantasy. What proof exists that the Harkles are living in Frogmore Cottage? How do we know that is not the realms of fantasy as well?

by Anonymousreply 17May 30, 2019 10:26 PM

R597 from the previous thread: yes, like that, but it would be even better with the original scene with Harry's face photoshopped badly over Joan's face. But well done for the effort, you have brought smiley brightness to the thread with your efforts.

R602 Yes, I am wondering about the UK press, too. They have such an odd relationship with the RF, it's almost sibling-esque. They gasp and clutch their pearls if anyone has a go at any of the royals, because only THEY are allowed to poop on them. And there is that unspoken "we won't actually print anything damaging most of the time, we'll just snark and hint" thing going on, as well. Spill the fuckin' tea, editors. No one can actually have you sent to the tower for it these days.

Was actually having a convo with a friend about this the other day. When Kate takes the kids to local parks and pools etc. (which she and Middleton granny are said to do frequently) she just asks other mothers not to take photos. And they comply! Now, I'm not saying it's cool to take photos of someone else's kids at the park, but can you imagine NO photos leaking out if Kim and Kanye (for example) took their to an LA park? SOMEONE would take a snap. You in public, lady. So are your kids. You don't get to tell me, even politely, what not to do with my phone. To repeat: I would not actually take photos of OPK (other people's kids) at the park. But being 'asked' not to would piss me off. My friend, an American, told me I was a "natural American" for this opinion (am actually British).

Same with stars and their security taking/threatening to take phones. FUCK RIGHT OFF.

Speaking of Kate, tho, I did a shameful thing DLers. I bought an item of clothing based on her wearing it. I haven't done that since the striped top Jessica Simpson wore in her Newlyweds show back in the olden days, when I was young enough to have an excuse for such pathetic fuckery. But I bought the M.I.H. blouse she wore with those awful culottes at the garden thingie. OH DEAR. Shit was sold out, too. Then sold out two more times before I got it.

by Anonymousreply 18May 30, 2019 10:31 PM

If they lived there wouldn't there be pics of Mozzie coming and going?

by Anonymousreply 19May 30, 2019 10:32 PM

R17 - Fantasy, really? I mean, odds exist. The odds she faked her pregnancy are low. A lot would have had to happen behind the scenes, and a lot of lies told and secrets kept by people who would be in Very Big Trouble if it were to come out. But "fantasy" that they might not be living at their not-fully-renovated-to-their-standards FrogCott when it probably wouldn't be too difficult to stash them somewhere else on a temporary basis? That doesn't sound insane to me. If someone told me Will and Kate had a little hideaway in the Lake District that no one knew about and they'd been there for a few weeks I wouldn't think that was on the same level as unicorns.

by Anonymousreply 20May 30, 2019 10:35 PM

What are these "ignore" comments? If they're what I think they are I just want to say I am always amused by people coming to gossip websites and then seeking out gossipers in order to shame them for coming to gossip sites and gossiping. It's like demonstrating your loathing of lion tamers by taming lions all the time. You don't have to be here, you cretins. If you don't like reading mean things about Meghan, there are many other threads here that do not involve mean things said about Meghan. You could go to them?

by Anonymousreply 21May 30, 2019 10:38 PM

R17 That is faulty logic. The person making the claim against the existing knowledge is the one who responsible for supporting the claim.

The Sussexes have said they live at Frogmore. The BRF have said they live at Frogmore. The British press have said they live at Frogmore. The palace insiders who don't like Meghan have leaked stories about all kinds of things but there are no royal leaks about Meghan and Harry living anywhere but Frogmore. Archie's birth certificate says Frogmore is their official address. The stories about the birth say Meghan was driven from Frogmore to the Portland. harry made his announcement from Windsor. The photocall with the baby was in Windsor.

So far on these threads I've heard that Frogmore had broken windows, holes in the roof and that dog walkers said the place was deserted. All these claims haven't been supported with any evidence.

If posters have evidence supporting the claim that the Sussexes aren't living at Frogmore then they should present it. An appeal to ignorance can say you don't know where they are, but to claim they aren't there because you haven't seen them, isn't sound logic.

by Anonymousreply 22May 30, 2019 10:42 PM

People who believe that moving either to LA or the UES is an option for the Harkles are ever so slightly deluded. Leaving aside matters of whether they can even afford housing befitting the grandson of the Queen, there's the pesky matter of security. Regardless of their popularity, they are still high profile and would need a high security building/mansion that's sufficiently large to accommodate the RPO contingent (making it even more expensive) Who's going to pay for security if they live in the U.S.? The British taxpayer? And the U.S. taxpayer since there would have to be increased police presence around them when they're out and about. I'm curious what the cost per day of securing the safety of the sixth in line to the throne in the U.S. would be.

Going to a Commonwealth country to do work on behalf of the RF is one thing, escaping to America is another.

by Anonymousreply 23May 30, 2019 10:42 PM

Unless, R23, she would be going to the US alone. She's not the mother to the heir of the throne.

by Anonymousreply 24May 30, 2019 10:46 PM

R23 although I think it extremely unlikely Hazbean will relocate anywhere (that isn't a commonwealth country where they can be said to be "working" and then only temporarily), if they were to move to the US I would imagine it would be precipitated by Harry going through the process of formally removing himself from the line of succession. Which imo is almost certainly not going to happen. If he's not officially one of them anymore, I don't think they're (the RF) responsible for his costs of living and security anymore - or are they?

by Anonymousreply 25May 30, 2019 10:46 PM

What about the Bahamas???

by Anonymousreply 26May 30, 2019 10:49 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 27May 30, 2019 10:51 PM

The Bahamas? Over my dead body.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 28May 30, 2019 10:52 PM

So Harry stayed at a luxury hotel in Rome that charged £33K for two nights and they served coffee with a plastic stirrer not a spoon? Harry's friend Nacho is an idiot. A luxury hotel would not send coffee to a Prince of the UK (or any other VIP) with a plastic stirrer. They would send full coffee service on a tray with nice china or porcelain cups and saucers and real spoons. He wasn't staying at the Holiday Inn Express.

by Anonymousreply 29May 30, 2019 10:53 PM

I'm curious to hear what sort of "work" they'll be doing on behalf of the BRF during an extended stay in a Commonwealth country.

by Anonymousreply 30May 30, 2019 10:54 PM

R25 Harry doesn't have to be removed from the line of succession to move to the US. He can stop being a working royal. Then he pays his own bills and he can live where he likes at his own expense. Even if he stayed in the UK, if he's not a working royal then he pays for his own expenses. Charles could pay for Harry from his private income, similar to Andrew and the York girls.

by Anonymousreply 31May 30, 2019 10:55 PM

R27, I think she just hooked up with Millie Mac, and fancied the gig. British reality stars make fortunes "cough" in overseas "visits" .

by Anonymousreply 32May 30, 2019 10:55 PM

Who is paying for the new set of renovations to Frogmore Cottage? If this is being unloaded again on the UK taxpayer, I want to know about it.

by Anonymousreply 33May 30, 2019 10:58 PM

I think it says in the article that the taxpayers have to pay for landscaping. Landscaping what?

by Anonymousreply 34May 30, 2019 11:00 PM

I'll revisit the article again, tomorrow, I'm just putting myself to bed. Well, chugging down my vino, before I put the husband to bed, the cat, lock the doors, etc etc....

by Anonymousreply 35May 30, 2019 11:02 PM

Why would taxpayers pay for landscaping? That's decorative, not refurbishment.

It's enough to turn one republican.

by Anonymousreply 36May 30, 2019 11:02 PM

The taxpayers are to pay for the building repairs. The Sussexes will pay for the landscaping. They might want more trees as a barrier.

by Anonymousreply 37May 30, 2019 11:02 PM

Ahhh, too much chugging vino, I got it the wrong way around. Apologies. Thank you R37

by Anonymousreply 38May 30, 2019 11:04 PM

R29 I had the same thought. I'm a Poor and I haven't seen a plastic stirrer since the fucking 90s.

R30 Bringing enlightenment to the Poorest Poors, of course. They'll jet in and teach them some mindfulness techniques in order to quell the hunger pangs. And then jet out again. Amazing!

R31 - Thank you. I didn't know that was an option.

by Anonymousreply 39May 30, 2019 11:08 PM

Don't all sigh at the mention of Sunshine Sachs but interesting links to that Nacho and them in "charitable" photos online. Is he being employed by Team Sussex? Why not employ a true long term friend of Hazza's ? Oh, they are all banished.

by Anonymousreply 40May 30, 2019 11:13 PM

;They are not at that dumpy Dumpy FrogCott. Meghan didn't marry a Prince to live in squalor.'

She just spent a year living in a fucking TWO BEDROOM COTTAGE! What is the matter with you? There's zero indication that she thinks she's entitled to a mansion.

by Anonymousreply 41May 30, 2019 11:15 PM

Interesting.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 42May 30, 2019 11:16 PM

Forgive me friends, I hate to interrupt my favorite thread, but is anyone else having trouble logging in with the new system? I’m posting this on my phone, where I’m still logged in the old way. But on my laptop I’m trying to login the new way, with email/password -no luck, can’t reply. I’ve sent emails for help, no response yet. Have searched for explanatory threads and announcements - nope. Any advice?

by Anonymousreply 43May 30, 2019 11:28 PM

Will we get any pics of Queens Letizia and Maxima, and (future queen) Catherine when they are together June 17th at Windsor Castle? Pretty please?!?

by Anonymousreply 44May 30, 2019 11:34 PM

Interesting tidbits from the article at R42,

[quote] The Sussexes want the flexibility of more commercial decisions.

[quote] The Sussexes weren't in a rush to make any changes, but the Cambridges were.

by Anonymousreply 45May 30, 2019 11:34 PM

Yes, it appears that the money tap of Daddy and Gan Gan has been turned off. Hazard needs to live within his £300k pa. They must be in debt already, given how madam seems to spend.

by Anonymousreply 46May 30, 2019 11:49 PM

That's a nice way to phrase it, "split". More like shown the door.

by Anonymousreply 47May 30, 2019 11:50 PM

Flexibility of commercial decisions= Ginge and Cringe want to promote expensive yoga ventures without being hampered by the fact that those ventures don't meet criteria of mental health initiatives. Of course they're in no rush to make changes, they were prepared to ride the coattails of the Cambridges and countless, actual mental health initiatives. Now they're going to be cast adrift before they have time to prop themselves up as legit, so soon after Megs quickened the split with her promotion of rich yoga friend's business. Cambridges are right to distance themselves from that sort of overt shilling fuckery.

by Anonymousreply 48May 31, 2019 12:01 AM

US posters, are you familiar with the concept of injunctions and the press in the UK?

by Anonymousreply 49May 31, 2019 1:10 AM

[You in public, lady]

R18 with her AA Urban Venacular

by Anonymousreply 50May 31, 2019 1:20 AM

Is "AA Urban Venacular" not for public discourse R50?

by Anonymousreply 51May 31, 2019 1:29 AM

R49, I’m not terribly familiar.

Is that why the story of Meghan’s flight to the Clooney mansion was only mentioned in an Australian outfit?

Seems like a tabloid, but the details are mighty specific. The source seemed to know a great deal.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 52May 31, 2019 1:34 AM

That may indeed be the reason, R52.

by Anonymousreply 53May 31, 2019 1:36 AM

R53, and something I’ve noticed about the DailyMail is that they will often cover stories that happen in the US that the American press won’t/doesn’t. For instance, a homeless man kicked a dog in NYC recently, and Alec Baldwin intervened. The DailyMail wrote a story on it. None of the New York dailies did. Their coverage and reporting on the Rackover/Comunale went deeper than the NY dailies did.

Perhaps the same principle at work. You can say more when you’re an ocean apart.

by Anonymousreply 54May 31, 2019 1:47 AM

Based on water-cooler conversation at the time of the celebrity threesome a few years back, r49, I came to the conclusion that these things may be understood in theory but not in practice.

There’s one caveat: the people who were playing guessing games worked in business and legal affairs, which makes me think the general public probably has very little understanding.

by Anonymousreply 55May 31, 2019 1:48 AM

R52 In other words, paranoid Meghan hates being "watched" (by Royal staff?) and wants to live like a super wealthy Hollywood celebrity instead of the accommodations that taxpayers shelled out millions to renovate. She's telling QE2 and the public that FC is beneath her, watch Harry try to sway the public into thinking that it's dangerous for them to live there when in reality it's Meghan who's causing a big stink over her own paranoia.

by Anonymousreply 56May 31, 2019 2:04 AM

Super injunctions are not easy to obtain. They are usually saved for very damaging information. It's doubtful that visiting someone else's house while they're away would qualify. The journalist in the link at R52 doesn't seem connected enough to have insider information that other journalists do not. Check her other stories.

If Meghan and Harry have separated that might qualify for a super injunction. These injunctions also only apply to British press. It wouldn't prevent American, European and Australian tabloids from carrying the story. And as happened with Ryan Giggs, the Twitterati could carry the details.

Having said that, I could see the British press (and others) agreeing to embargo the information about Meghan's whereabouts if she were really overwhelmed post partum and wanted to escape to the Clooney's place or somewhere else. She looked shaky as shit at that photo call.

by Anonymousreply 57May 31, 2019 2:04 AM

I bet she is totally spied upon - bugged, phone bugged all of it 24/7 - they probably know when she poops. So she has fled to a "non bugged" domicile - with better accommodations - but the whole she has her own kitchen and gym thing sounds more like she has her own little apartment set up going on.

by Anonymousreply 58May 31, 2019 2:06 AM

TL:DR: Everyone hates Meg, they still live at Toad Hall. (Probably because everyone hates them, Sherlock!)

Can I please see some hats now? Somebody must have worn something memorable to the Windsor wedding.

by Anonymousreply 59May 31, 2019 2:20 AM

Will you accept this in lieu of a hat?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 60May 31, 2019 2:25 AM

R60, what a grotesque, clownish outfit.

by Anonymousreply 61May 31, 2019 2:27 AM

R58, see, that is NOT far-fetched. George has been protective of MM.

It is not unusual for a huge home/mansion to have an “in-law” apartment or quarters for a live-in housekeeper attached to the home. My sister lived in one when she nannied for the hedge fund manager. It was damn nice.

You cannot convince me that Meghan would live in a home where there was active renovation. Even normal people stay somewhere else.

by Anonymousreply 62May 31, 2019 2:28 AM

Agreed on the superinjunctions (apparently, I'm no legal expert) being handed down only in situations where serious damage could occur to a reputation, marriage etc. Which is still bullshit imo, but the UK is gonna UK I guess.

I remember reading something (one of the broadsheets iirc?) about how to tell what celebs are involved in a superinjunction. Apparently if you start seeing a bunch of weirdly placed (i.e. prominently placed) stories that seem to be of no consequence about a given sleb, and over a number of days/weeks, it's the tabs hinting at what they can't come out and print. I remember reading this and actually realizing the DM totally did it with one of the superinjunctions that involved Elton John's husband. Like I'd actually noticed the weird non-stories involving specifically the husband, and it had already struck me as odd (why the husband getting covered for something non consequential that he'd done on his own? etc.), and then I read the broadsheet article and was like OHHHHHH. It was some sex thing, I think, wasn't it? He'd been fucking around, and I assume he and Elton both do it and are fine with it, but probably Elton didn't want that getting out and hurting his new good guy rep or some shit? I don't know, it was a few years ago.

ANYWAY that's interesting and I suppose we should be keeping our eyes out for, ummm... stories about Hazbean's driver buying some groceries at a grocery store??? It would be extra difficult to parse stories about them because I feel like the press already, legitimately, will publish a story about the royals grocery shopping, even without it being a weird hint at a banned story they can't print, ya know?

by Anonymousreply 63May 31, 2019 2:30 AM

R55, then she's an idiot. You don't marry into a taxpayer funded family and expect that the taxpayers don't want to see what their funds are supporting.

Fuckwit.

by Anonymousreply 64May 31, 2019 2:34 AM

R64, to clarify, the poster is not the fuckwit. The taxpayer sponge is the fuckwit.

by Anonymousreply 65May 31, 2019 2:35 AM

Stand and Deliver!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 66May 31, 2019 2:50 AM

💩

by Anonymousreply 67May 31, 2019 3:38 AM

Concerned homosexualists of Datalounge,

I employ you, fear not for me! Let neither tear nor snot wash a bare streak through the turgid filth upon your peasanty countenances. Myself, I am fine; I send my love!

Whilst I should love to endeavour to illucidate unto you the whither and dither of my new life lapping languidly against the damp walls of five-star Queen’s Suite with in la Tour, I’ve yet to lure a raven to the bars foresuch to carry my heartborne missive, quilled in my life’s very blood upon a used Nando’s Sérvîétté (that’s “napkin” to the likes of yourselves), upon its blackest, darkest, ebony-black plumage foresuch to deliver it unto my dear friend The Arch Bishop of Canterberry foresuch that he should post it to the Internet. My life as it is, is a thing of complication these days, you do see. How lucky was I to find a mouse to carry this, the Truncated Note unto your selves!

My darlings, know that the Universe does #LOVE me and things shall always work out in my favour. They dare not do!

Love & light,

by Anonymousreply 68May 31, 2019 3:40 AM

R68 I was promised a perp walk. I demand justice.

by Anonymousreply 69May 31, 2019 3:47 AM

I employ you, fear not for me! Let neither tear nor snot

Do you mean 'implore'?

by Anonymousreply 70May 31, 2019 4:33 AM

Will Andrew's girls be referred to as Princess Beatrice of York and Princess Eugenie of York when Charles ascends the throne to distinguish their position?

by Anonymousreply 71May 31, 2019 5:00 AM

"Do you mean 'implore'? "

Big words are hard :(

by Anonymousreply 72May 31, 2019 5:46 AM

R70,

One does not dane to impudently mansplain the ENGLISH language to a genuine Royal HRH Princess of the ENGLISH, Great Britain, the United Kingdom, and Dumbarton; certainly not one whom, with neither pater nor student loan — a mere orphan dragged up from an unleavened playing field with but a dream in her overflowing crown chakra, an abundance of preternatural beauty, a safety-pinned old WonderBra, a soupçon of Goddess-bestowed intellect, and the heart of a lion — managed to matriculate her blessed self right the way through Northwestern University before graduating Magné con Laude with a quadruple major in all the hardest majors. One does not dane!

My peasantry! Ugh!!!

by Anonymousreply 73May 31, 2019 5:51 AM

R71, yes.

by Anonymousreply 74May 31, 2019 7:15 AM

Well, well, well. Looks like Hazza is obsessed with his image an what we see now is damage control. Good luck, they've seen you now.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 75May 31, 2019 8:03 AM

Hi R43, not noticed a change, but I don't log in, lol.

by Anonymousreply 76May 31, 2019 8:22 AM

Thank you R76, another email resolved it.

by Anonymousreply 77May 31, 2019 9:49 AM

Own up, DLers, which one of you did this?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 78May 31, 2019 9:49 AM

Princess Anne is in Estonia with a sharp updo going on.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 79May 31, 2019 9:53 AM

Looking rather lovely in the neutral colours.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 80May 31, 2019 9:55 AM

The princess sat next to Twiggy at a dinner party. She didn’t speak to her for 2 hours. Finally, she turned to her and asked: “Who are you?”

The supermodel responded: “I’m Lesley Hornby, ma’am, but people call me Twiggy.”

“How unfortunate,” Princess Margaret said.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 81May 31, 2019 10:17 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 82May 31, 2019 10:26 AM

Super injunctions are not that hard to get. Loads of pop singers have gotten one just to avoid embarrassment With the BRF there is the whole security issue. Not unlikely. Things like the organic veg garden come to mind.

by Anonymousreply 83May 31, 2019 11:45 AM

T44 - I'm sure someone here and myself will post photos of the Garter ceremony. I love the black capes and plumed white hats. It's quite the spectacle.

by Anonymousreply 84May 31, 2019 11:45 AM

My reply above was meant for R44

by Anonymousreply 85May 31, 2019 11:45 AM

Why Felipe and Willem and not the Belgian king ? What have these two done for such an honor R84 ?

by Anonymousreply 86May 31, 2019 12:06 PM

It didn't take the tabloids long.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 87May 31, 2019 12:06 PM

Why does Harry always look like birds have been living in his hair and beard?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 88May 31, 2019 12:08 PM

These two never turn down an opportunity to drink.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 89May 31, 2019 12:12 PM

R80 My, that lady in blue certainly has an "easy care" hairdo (assuming she's in good health). Nice dress, though.

by Anonymousreply 90May 31, 2019 12:12 PM

Which could explain his scarlet face, R89.

by Anonymousreply 91May 31, 2019 12:12 PM

A colorful duo - the Queen and her sister Princess Margaret.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 92May 31, 2019 12:13 PM

I'd take any opportunity for a drink at these events. It probably helps relieve the boredom of all that handshaking.

by Anonymousreply 93May 31, 2019 12:14 PM

Behind the scenes of Lady Gabriella Windsor's wedding.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 94May 31, 2019 12:15 PM

Gabriella's gown is magical. Beccaria or whatever her name is, lovely job. Did anyone complain that she's Italian, not British?

by Anonymousreply 95May 31, 2019 12:18 PM

In R87 Kate's joy is that her 3rd child learned to walk? No mention of her triumphant garden design. This must be written for the frauiest of frauen.

by Anonymousreply 96May 31, 2019 12:20 PM

Well I guess it's better than Markle's most precious thing being her passport, in a recently surfaced article R96, lol

by Anonymousreply 97May 31, 2019 12:24 PM

Very beautiful Wedding gown from Beccaria Lucia . Tumbs up for that . I Loved Eugenie s Wedding gown too and the one from Kate .

by Anonymousreply 98May 31, 2019 12:29 PM

Fergie has landed herself a TV gig. A royal documentary on the life of Princess Louise of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 99May 31, 2019 12:36 PM

Lol, never thought I'd see Lainey grammar checking and editing one of sussexroyal's posts. The writing must be truly awful if she is picking up on it.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 100May 31, 2019 12:40 PM

They regularly appear in public looking disheveled. Why should their IG be different?

by Anonymousreply 101May 31, 2019 12:50 PM

R95 - Ella isn't a working royal so she can have a designer of any nationality without many complaints.

by Anonymousreply 102May 31, 2019 12:51 PM

Unpopular opinion alert.

Generally I like Luisa Beccaria romanticism. However, Gabriella's dress looks like dictator chic in fabric form.

by Anonymousreply 103May 31, 2019 12:58 PM

Why is Lainey pretending that Yoko isn't updating the account? It only get's updated once in a blue moon, compared to what Yoko used to be like on The Tig. We've all seen pictures of her juggling drinks, forking food, and tapping furiously away on a device in her holiday snaps around the world, pre-Hairy. Would she not be able to tap away while baby was asleep? While she rocked baby? I doubt she'd let ANYONE near her precious account, other than herself. Can you imagine the DM's, lol.

by Anonymousreply 104May 31, 2019 12:58 PM

After looking at the Sussex Instagram, I wondered if UK English rules about commas, etc. are different than US.

The long captions on that account are a big mess of run on. It looks like lots of commas are missing in the sentences.

I’ve always thought British English was more proper and rule based. It must be an American running the account.

They need to hire someone else. I don’t understand having someone who can’t write be in charge of something that is primarily about writing.

by Anonymousreply 105May 31, 2019 1:18 PM

Why would she lavish more attention on her Instagram account than she does on herself? The DETAILS always end up sidelining her. Like not checking for dangling price tags when wearing a new article of clothing, for just one little example. Proper spelling and punctuation? Pfffft. That's for losers. She's too busy being a ROCK STAR!

by Anonymousreply 106May 31, 2019 1:22 PM

R71 - Beatrice and Eugenie were born Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie and that will not change at any point in their lives. Grandchildren of the Sovereign in the male line, automatically HRHs. Born royal. Born Princesses of the Blood. Why would that change when their Uncle Charles becomes King?

by Anonymousreply 107May 31, 2019 1:24 PM

Interesting article about Charlotte. MM isn't the first biracial member of the royal family. Frogmore Cottage was built for Queen Charlotte.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 108May 31, 2019 1:24 PM

R87 - I like the first comment listed on that story, by bnaff: "Not yet, I want to see her curtsy to Catherine first . . ."

by Anonymousreply 109May 31, 2019 1:29 PM

Weren't the moors more tanned berbers/arabs rather than africans?

by Anonymousreply 110May 31, 2019 1:29 PM

Here are portraits of Charlotte and George's children. Prince Augustus, the Duke of Sussex was handsome. He had pretty blue eyes. The other kids had blue eyes too. Granted, the portraits may have made everyone look better than they did in real life.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 111May 31, 2019 1:29 PM

Queen Charlotte looks like Brendan Fraser.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 112May 31, 2019 1:31 PM

Gabriella's wedding photos.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 113May 31, 2019 1:33 PM

R110 - Yes, they were.

by Anonymousreply 114May 31, 2019 1:35 PM

R110 The Moors were Berbers. The Berbers, including Arabized Berbers, are North Africans.

by Anonymousreply 115May 31, 2019 1:36 PM

There are lots of beautiful oil portraits of various royals in this Pinterest page. The dresses and jewels are stunning.

At the top left is a portrait of the daughter of Mad King George + Queen Charlotte, Princess Augusta Sophia who was forbidden to marry by her mother after her father went insane.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 116May 31, 2019 1:38 PM

R166 I've seen the same young woman pictured above identified daughter (from oldesst to youngest):

1. Charlotte (Princess Royal)

2. Princess Augusta Sophia

3. Princess Elizabeth

Maybe one of our DLroyal experts can tell us the correct daughter.

by Anonymousreply 117May 31, 2019 1:44 PM

typo: oldest

by Anonymousreply 118May 31, 2019 1:44 PM

To be more specific, the original Moors were North African. Over time the term came to mean Muslim, whether from North Africa or not.

by Anonymousreply 119May 31, 2019 1:45 PM

This may be an old photo but here is Rose Cholmondeley in the family way. I can see Nutmeg releasing a photo like this one.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 120May 31, 2019 1:47 PM

Prince Augustus did seem to be the best-looking son, although he looks a bit chubby like Jonah Hill in this portrait. Edward Duke of Kent looks like Taylor Swift. Ernest Augustus looks like Boris Johnson. Let's hope that's not an omen.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 121May 31, 2019 1:48 PM

William with silly hair.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 122May 31, 2019 1:49 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 123May 31, 2019 1:49 PM

This portrait is identified as Princess Elizabeth but she looks just like the other portrait on Pinterest identified as Augusta Sophia. Whoever it is (they are), they were beautiful. What a tragic life - forbidden to marry because of your insane dad.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 124May 31, 2019 1:52 PM

R115 - By the time of "Othello" and the invasions of Spain and southern Europe, the Moors were:

"Moor, in English usage, a Moroccan or, formerly, a member of the Muslim population of what is now Spain and Portugal. Of mixed Arab, Spanish, and Amazigh (Berber) origins, the Moors created the Arab Andalusian civilization and subsequently settled as refugees in North Africa between the 11th and 17th centuries."

So it is a mixed genealogical picture.

by Anonymousreply 125May 31, 2019 1:55 PM

This is a gossip thread. It says so right there in the title. Not sure how oil paintings of people who have been dead for several centuries fits that.

by Anonymousreply 126May 31, 2019 1:57 PM

R126 - Why not? Isn't there gossip about dead people? I know people who sit around talking about the conspiracy to conceal what they fully believe: that Shakespeare was really Mary Sidney, and it's as much as your life is worth to let it get about that you have definite proof. You should hear them - they make arguments about Meghan/Kate/William/Harry/Charles/Camilla look tame.

I'm tempted to open a thread on the subject, but according to this group of (dear, I hasten to add) friends, the descendants of the Earl of Oxford's family will have me stabbed in some shadowy byway in London. Of course, given the state of London right now, especially knife crime, no one will ever suspect who the real criminals are . . .

We're still gossiping about who really killed the Little Princes in the Tower.

This is an equal opportunity gossip site: the dead and the living are both eligible for excoriating comments.

by Anonymousreply 127May 31, 2019 2:03 PM

RF needs to actively recruit Argentine men to become spouses of homely Windsors to introduce better genes. Nacho is gorgeous. There's a new neighbor who is from Argentina. He's very handsome and sexy. But like, Nacho, he has a pretty blonde wife and lots of adorable little kids. Guillermo Vilas was so handsome. Now he looks like GeneSimmons. (See below). Aging is such a bitch!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 128May 31, 2019 2:04 PM

OMG MY EYES! ^^^^^^

by Anonymousreply 129May 31, 2019 2:05 PM

Hmm, articles like this one and the ones stating that they could no move in b/c of an organic veg garden may possibly be hinting at things.

Those who stridently bray that they are surely living there have an agenda and no credibility. They could be/may not be. Evidence such as lights in the windows from the public path could be useful. Heathrow flyer poster on these threads, we await your pronouncements.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 130May 31, 2019 2:05 PM

R126 Annoying Hall Monitor, Queen Charlotte was bi-racial. MM is bi-racial and gets slammed for it. The royals shown in the oil portraits have gossip assocaited with them. The thread title doesn't say that we are limited to 2019.

by Anonymousreply 131May 31, 2019 2:06 PM

R130 So lame. They haven't spent all this money NOT to live in Forgmore Cottage. Unless you believe the Queen's social media is lying, she visited H&M&A at Frogmore Cottage as dd others. Give it up They are living there and have been living there before Archie was born. Now they will be adding windows, doors and landscaping.

by Anonymousreply 132May 31, 2019 2:08 PM

R130 , it's all so ridiculous. She had her friends leaking to the press that there were outdoor toys ( I guess swings, slides, climbing frame) at FroHo so Archie would grow up "outdoorsy" ( yes, they actually did use that word ). The baby has/hasn't just been born! It's not a baby monkey swinging through the gardens! NOW, everything is to be landscaped? Outdoor gardens lighting? Organic vegetables? Whatever next? I say this avalanche of articles about FroHo is to hide something. Just the little fact that they are not there, perhaps?

by Anonymousreply 133May 31, 2019 2:12 PM

The thread is about the BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY. It doesn't matter if they're DEAD or ALIVE.

For those who aren't interested in British royal history, scroll past the posts or move along. Some of us like to learn things we may not have known.

by Anonymousreply 134May 31, 2019 2:12 PM

Lazy Bones has promised to pop by when he can, and there was a poster with the dog-walking friend, but he might have disappeared from the thread after some cockwomble was rude to him.

I agree R134, we all love the Margaret , Wallis , Queen Mother stories, and some of us LOVE going back further.

by Anonymousreply 135May 31, 2019 2:14 PM

R133 - the more she spends the British taxpayer's money on Frogmire, the more angry they'll get especially when the economy is hit by Brexit woes.

by Anonymousreply 136May 31, 2019 2:15 PM

That is funny, R133. The baby will not even be walking for a year, why would he need a playscape?

The pond is what would worry me with a toddler. You could see how little Louis just takes off.

Were there any new snaps of Louis for his birthday?

The article about her living at the Clooney home was not officially denied, was it?

by Anonymousreply 137May 31, 2019 2:17 PM

Maybe that's what the BRF want R136, the public to despise her before she exits.

by Anonymousreply 138May 31, 2019 2:17 PM

Prince Louis at 1.

The video from the flower show really does his personality justice.

Archie may not have as happy a childhood, narc parents and those with substance abuse problems are really hard on their kids.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 139May 31, 2019 2:19 PM

Good point, R138.

The question is, apart from her globalist middle aged new friends, who, pray tell, embraces Rach?

by Anonymousreply 140May 31, 2019 2:20 PM

If Duchess Yoko were to totally become a figure of hate and ridicule, it would be very hard for her to command an audience if she does exit. It would be a job well done by the Firm, as I can't see her sticking to any NDA's. She uses too many of her new hangers on to speak out.

by Anonymousreply 141May 31, 2019 2:23 PM

Agree, R141.

If she thought her options were few as Suits wound down, imagine they will be fewer once the final stages of this gig imploding wrap up.

She is delusional if she thinks she can live off having shaken up the BRF in the US, having gotten booted out in the process. Any battle over custody will surely be wild. Her Sunshine Sachs handlers must be delusional too. Her whole humanitarian image was a PR creation and we can see she is all about the $$$ and using dick to social climb. Just like her feminism is fake as fuck.

Archie may be ok if he has a stable, kind, long term nanny, although narcs tend to prefer a revolving door. Even prior to his birth, Rach seemed to see him as a weapon to swipe at the Cambridges. Best if his exposure to both parents is somewhat minimized.

by Anonymousreply 142May 31, 2019 2:30 PM

Omg, any new renovations would surely harm all those incredibly good vibes all her friends were telling the rags about!

by Anonymousreply 143May 31, 2019 2:30 PM

Another "pal" is telling the People ( I know, I know ) all about it today, and about the kitchen where Harry plans to entertain. They've apparently had streams of visitors, has he not even offered one a cuppa, yet? The one strange point in the new article is the "pal" saying Harry plans to hold hunting parties there. Yes, that's right, in the kitchen! Shoot a mouse? Chloroform a frog? Is MM trying to conform to stay in the family and champion the hunting, now?

by Anonymousreply 144May 31, 2019 2:36 PM

R141 - I don't believe enough of the British public care enough one way or the other to let it get to hate and ridicule - that level may continue on social media and sites like this, but no one cares enough outside these sites for much heat. I do think the bloom will come off the rose fairly quickly, unless you are one of Kaiser's diehard fraus on Celebitchy.

That said, I also do think that after what anyone who isn't a diehard frau must admit was a less than stellar first year for the newly minted Duchess, the BRF will have a very hard time trying to keep up the facade of a perfectly normal pair of senior working royals, nicely integrated into the Firm and the family, etc., etc. The latest news of the Sussexes splitting off from the Royal Foundation makes it abundantly clear that they want to go their own way, on the taxpayers' payroll, for as long as they can get away with it. Meghan has made it only too clear too quickly that she isn't working for the BRF, she's working for herself and using the BRF to build her own global brand, and if they don't like it, they can go fuck themselves.

The question is, are the BRF willing to let them get away with it in perpetuity, or are there already long-term, slow-burning plans to ease them out at some point?

by Anonymousreply 145May 31, 2019 2:37 PM

Oh no, R144!

They place all this BS PR cuz there is no there there.

Rach and Dim are both nasty empty suits, complete PR fabrications.

by Anonymousreply 146May 31, 2019 2:39 PM

R130 is a classic conspiracy theorist. The ad hominem attack. Everyone who disagrees with her must lack credibility or have an agenda.

Since you're also R83, super injunctions are not that easy to get because they are seen as an attack on freedom of expression and transparency of public figures. If, "loads of pop stars gotten one," you wouldn't know because the point of the injunction is that it can't be reported that it exists. The type of injunction you may mean is an anonymised injunction. You hear the story but not who it's about and then people try to guess.

When Andrew Marr had a super injunction nobody had a clue until he outed himself.

The problem with any injunction in the current media climate is that the publication of the information outside the jurisdiction of the court raises grounds for invalidating the stupid thing. If it's salacious enough, someone outside the UK will sniff it out and publish it. See David Furnish and Elton John.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 147May 31, 2019 2:42 PM

Harry seems to have toned down the nattering on about menstruation at random events. If Me-Gain still writing his remarks?

I think Lord Doom and the Africa Plan may have spooked her a bit?

by Anonymousreply 148May 31, 2019 2:43 PM

Trolls gonna troll.

Harry just won a court case re: photos of their rental house. The idea that an injunction re: their living quarters would be quite difficult to obtain is implausible.

Calling people conspiracy theorists, women, etc is weak and tips your hand. If it is so implausible to you, the vitriol would not be necessary, you would just scroll on. Instead, you just bring more attention to what you are trying to quash.

Much about Rach and Dim is sketchy as fuck, great fodder for a gossip site. Control freaks can huff and puff but lots of folks see right through their PR images. They are not going to be able to build a lucrative global brand. The Firm seems to have won again.

by Anonymousreply 149May 31, 2019 2:51 PM

Thought that triple glazed windows were installed in Frog Cot in March? Now, talk of windows to replace those 2 months later? Odd.

Expensive, too!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 150May 31, 2019 2:55 PM

They couldn’t live there when a vegetable garden OUTSIDE was being planted.

But they’re going to live there with a baby while INDOORS structural renovations are being made?

Come on.

by Anonymousreply 151May 31, 2019 2:59 PM

I wonder who the mysterious "another" , next to Splash's name, was in that legal case?

by Anonymousreply 152May 31, 2019 3:03 PM

Hey, R151, if the Harry Styles/spazz troll says that they live there, it MUST be so.

Come on, lol.

Why is the article re: her living in the Clooney home with the baby dismissed out of hand?

Going after Splash that way must have trimmed their income quite a bit, talk about cutting off your nose to further your victim narrative. These 2 are so short sighted, or, are desperate for cash. Why might that be the case? Must be all that, erm, wholesome living.

by Anonymousreply 153May 31, 2019 3:15 PM

R149 There is no hand to tip. My posting history is obvious. I'm not a troll. I'm a person who disagrees with the idea that the world's media are covering for the Sussexes. A super injunction would only bind the British press who have no love for them after the birth announcement and photo call situation. The British press have nothing to gain from covering for Meghan and Harry because they haven't show any loyalty to the British press. All it would take is for one British journalist to pass the information on to BILD or some other global media outlet. There are also enough courtiers who hate Meghan that the story would leak in a way that they could report.

As I have said before, it is possible that the Sussexes aren't living at Frogmore, but on balance that is unlikely since the information from both friendly and unfriendly sources say they're living at Frogmore.

by Anonymousreply 154May 31, 2019 3:15 PM

How did this get out? The fans are raging at the suggestion, lol.

This flight attendant cover-up is hilarious. Like the make-up artist cover-up, too. Bloody funny.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 155May 31, 2019 3:17 PM

Harry Styles/spazz troll, your fuming led me to do a Google search. Probably the opposite result than you intended but you have no one to blame but yourself for your ludicrous statements.

Turns out, ladies and gentlemen that Styles himself has obtained injunctions, something the HS troll likely knows. Cannot be that hard to get, eh? And he is a not very good pop singer. Not a one off thing that only Elton could get after all. Unlikely when it comes to the BRF? My sides!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 156May 31, 2019 3:30 PM

Has there ever been any evidence whatsoever that Doria (seems to go by various spellings of the last name, hmmm) was a flight attendant?

Alienating the press playing white knight to a bad news stalker and then the nonsense with the birth of the baby is coming back to bite them, hard. Seems like the press is trying to get their licks in before they are shipped off to Africa, perhaps?

Sunshine Sachs seems quite inept. Is repping her going to hurt THEIR brand? One wonders.

Markus and Doria and Dim at IG in Toronto. No chef in sight. Interesting photos.

by Anonymousreply 157May 31, 2019 3:36 PM

The evidence is 'she said so' and if you are even slightly critical then you must be a racist troll questioning the new queen

by Anonymousreply 158May 31, 2019 3:38 PM

That reminded me to find the DM's response , again. Glaringly obvious what a scheming liar MM was, yet the relationship continued.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 159May 31, 2019 3:43 PM

Whoops, the response to the dim prince's letter.

by Anonymousreply 160May 31, 2019 3:44 PM

R155 That article is hilarious. Seriously though, the Meghan fan defending her against this gossip is wrong about licensed social workers not allowed to have criminal records. They can and many of them have, yes they do go through background checks, and depending on the types of employers they work for their criminal records can be overlooked if they provide explanations. For instance at many rehabilitation facilities, they do hire social workers who have experienced addiction or previously incarcerated. In fact it’s called peer support counselors. You can apply to attend master’s program in social work even if you have a criminal record. This is a simple fact that you can look up. As you move up the mental health support chain, the background requirements become more strict. Obviously those of us who have prescriptive powers have higher standards. Social workers function in different roles within healthcare and mental health milieu, thus they have more leeway, in fact for certain programs such as drug rehabilitation services it’s often preferred that the peer support have similar experiences.

by Anonymousreply 161May 31, 2019 3:46 PM

R156 What's a Harry Styles?

by Anonymousreply 162May 31, 2019 3:47 PM

WHO actually said Doria was a flight attendant?

I never read The Tig but had Me-Gain made any reference to it before this spring?

What was the name of the cult she was in? That story was confirmed, I believe. They may even have been married there?

by Anonymousreply 163May 31, 2019 3:48 PM

Labelling someone who disagrees with you the Troll of your choice seems to be the flavour of the moment.

by Anonymousreply 164May 31, 2019 3:49 PM

The flight attendant story has only been made up recently, around Spring, like you say R163. Around the time the jailed Doria stories were gaining more wind.

by Anonymousreply 165May 31, 2019 3:54 PM

Markle never mentioned it in the Tig. Ever.

by Anonymousreply 166May 31, 2019 3:55 PM

Chopra is another Sunshine Sachs client, yes?

Nobodies and has beens and desperate puffing. What a waste of $ it all is. Entertaining tho.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 167May 31, 2019 3:56 PM

Does Me-Gain have any adulthood friends NOT tied to Suits, Soho House or Sunshine Sachs? Quite alliterative, lol.

Have we been presented with any? Think all the celeb friends are SS clients?

by Anonymousreply 168May 31, 2019 3:58 PM

R105, in my experience, the British use far fewer commas than Americans do.

I reckon Meg is writing or overseeing the IG account, especially now that she has not much else to do besides get back into shape and supervise nanny/cook/housekeeper.

by Anonymousreply 169May 31, 2019 4:05 PM

I don't think Chopra has been to see her. She flew in to London to see / meet Mariah Carey at the Royal Albert Hall as an anniversary present off her husband.

by Anonymousreply 170May 31, 2019 4:10 PM

Priyanka has global name recognition. She's a small screen actress in the US, but she was been an Indian star for almost 20 years and is definitely an A-lister there. That she has managed to cross over and get media attention in the US after the age of 25 is commendable in my book. I'm not a fan of most of her work but I have a grudging admiration for actors who manage to have longevity in a notoriously youth-focussed and fickle industry.

I wonder if Meghan Priyanka and Serena are "starting from the bottom now we're here" kinda friends. Hmmm.

by Anonymousreply 171May 31, 2019 4:10 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 172May 31, 2019 4:31 PM

Nothing is ever straight with that whole family. All secrets and lies.

by Anonymousreply 173May 31, 2019 4:32 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 174May 31, 2019 4:49 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 175May 31, 2019 4:52 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 176May 31, 2019 4:54 PM

Buried in the Frogmore renovation story, the Sun is reporting that the Sussexes still have a place in the Cotswolds.

[quote] The couple also have a stunning £2.5million Cotswold farmhouse.

[quote] Meghan’s mum Doria Ragland has also visited the Grade II-listed country retreat, set in four acres of rolling Oxfordshire hills.

[quote] And the house comes with a two-bedroom cottage for guests or staff.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 177May 31, 2019 5:01 PM

They signed a two-year lease, but wasn't the whole purpose of their little lawsuit a way to get out of it?

by Anonymousreply 178May 31, 2019 5:05 PM

The Sussexes have no nanny, only a housekeeper at Frogmore.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 179May 31, 2019 5:05 PM

R178 according to the Sussexes court documents, they've left the place that was photographed. It's not clear if the Sun is reporting on a different property in the Cotswolds or if the information is out of date.

by Anonymousreply 180May 31, 2019 5:09 PM

R120, that Rose of Chumley 'former model' has ONE good angle and only one, but I will admit that it is a very good one. Get that one angle just right and it hides her total lack of a chin.

by Anonymousreply 181May 31, 2019 5:12 PM

R179, I find that a little difficult to believe. She’s rattling around that mansion all alone with just a single housekeeper? She doesn’t have an assistant or secretary? She must get tons of fan mail and invitations that need to be answered. Her whole life didn’t just boil down to newborn care. Type A women don’t do that.

Who’s watching the baby when she has to take a shower or do her yoga? Who’s doing the shopping? Does she have Amazon Prime droned in?

by Anonymousreply 182May 31, 2019 5:13 PM

Kate, William and the kids are at Sandringham for half term.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 183May 31, 2019 5:14 PM

R182 Frogmore isn't the office. I don't expect fan mail there.

Many women, even type A ones, manage without nannies. I'm not saying Meghan is managing without one, but let's not make out that she's doing something superhuman if she is.

by Anonymousreply 184May 31, 2019 5:17 PM

The Cambridges are in Norfolk. I wonder where Rose is spending her half term hollies?

by Anonymousreply 185May 31, 2019 5:20 PM

A climbing woman like Meghan, who marries a prince, isn't aiming for a lifestyle where she does everything herself.

by Anonymousreply 186May 31, 2019 5:24 PM

In photos Louis always looks so sweet and happy. I think I'm going to live vicariously through his happy, no-pressure childhood (unlike George who is being groomed for his future role, Louis just gets to hang out and be adored). George is the heir, Charlotte is the spare, but Louis was born only to make people happy.

by Anonymousreply 187May 31, 2019 5:25 PM

R182 Frogmore Cottage is not a “mansion”. It’s a relatively big house. And invitations and “fan mail” go via secretaries and assistants. Chances are high Markle doesn’t even read them.

by Anonymousreply 188May 31, 2019 5:50 PM

It's tiny! It's very tiny!

by Anonymousreply 189May 31, 2019 5:59 PM

R175 Daily Mail, I hate you, but I also love you: "The Duke of Cambridge may choose not bring up the President's previous comment in a radio interview that he would have slept with Diana, Princess of Wales, without hesitation."

by Anonymousreply 190May 31, 2019 6:06 PM

Newborns sleep for 15 hours. How much more time could Meghan need to sleep stretch and meddle with Instagram?

I expect the Sussexes will get a nanny sometime in the 3-6 month period.

by Anonymousreply 191May 31, 2019 6:07 PM

Priyanka Chopra is in the DM denying she's been at Frogmore, lol. The link is too long to fit in the box * blushes *

by Anonymousreply 192May 31, 2019 6:09 PM

FRIDAY, MAY 31, 2019 Blind Item #10 The essentially banned from this country because of his underage sex exploits here A list royal has already made plans to ask for the ban to be lifted when he meets one on one next week with the person that can make that happen. POSTED BY ENT LAWYER AT 11:00 AM 8 COMMENTS

Looks like Andrew is going to be all over Mr Trumpy.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 193May 31, 2019 6:15 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 194May 31, 2019 6:17 PM

Yes! Thank you R184.

by Anonymousreply 195May 31, 2019 6:19 PM

Aargh, R194 I mean!

by Anonymousreply 196May 31, 2019 6:19 PM

It was reported in the early days that Doria had a history of multiple liens, judgements and bankruptcies. She also appeared to con/cheat her much younger brother out of his half of the house they both inherited from their father. I think Meghan learned her grifting from her mother. Doria was also not a flight attendant FFS. More lies copied by Meghans PR from the Middletons.

by Anonymousreply 197May 31, 2019 6:42 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 198May 31, 2019 6:43 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 199May 31, 2019 6:54 PM

There was a story a while ago (in the DM, I think) saying that Trump and others were known to visit the Deal or No Deal set to make the acquaintance of the “ladies”. It was, I seem to recall, quick to say that there was no evidence that Markle met up with Trump.

Would be hilarious if she had.

by Anonymousreply 200May 31, 2019 7:02 PM

R200, that golf tournament lady had some bizarre comments about MM...

by Anonymousreply 201May 31, 2019 7:21 PM

Doria had a business bankruptcy and she bought her brother out of the house. I think it's the same one who keeps opening up his photo album. The source of the very unflattering photo of her post partum. He's the chattiest of the Raglands. If he's been cheated I suspect he would have said something. He certainly had something to say about not being invited to the wedding.

by Anonymousreply 202May 31, 2019 7:23 PM

What do you mean R202? It's a lovely pic.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 203May 31, 2019 7:28 PM

Have to laugh at Lainey lecturing people "That’s what royal people do. Now that Meghan Markle is a royal person, she doesn’t have time for riff-rafts."

What's a riff-RAFT?

by Anonymousreply 204May 31, 2019 7:35 PM

Personally, I don’t think Doria was a flight attendant. That is actually very funny to contemplate. I don’t think she was in prison, either. I’d guess that she was spending a loooooot of time in that weird religion. The fact that no one can say where she was (which airline, for a start) is a red flag, though.

by Anonymousreply 205May 31, 2019 7:37 PM

If the flight attendant story was a lie, it’s a good one to copy. The average person will say, “oh right her mother was a flight attendant. Or was that Williams’s wife? Who knows, who cares” etc

by Anonymousreply 206May 31, 2019 7:38 PM

R204, Lainey’s logic makes Melania Presidential. Tee hee.

by Anonymousreply 207May 31, 2019 7:38 PM

Oooh, it's all coming out, now. #GirlWasThirsty

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 208May 31, 2019 7:40 PM

Harry being made to look like a true fool lmao

by Anonymousreply 209May 31, 2019 7:44 PM

Megs is like hey whatever, keep 'em moving, NEXT!!

by Anonymousreply 210May 31, 2019 7:52 PM

From one penis to the next , like a pogo stick, boing boing boing.

by Anonymousreply 211May 31, 2019 7:56 PM

Sorry, I can’t let this go. There is absolutely no way that Meghan is staying in a house with ONLY a newborn and a housekeeper. Her mother went back to the US. Her husband is busy with his “job”. She did seem to have a visit with old PuttyFace Mulroney, so there was some company.

Narcissists need their supply. I can’t reconcile what I know of Meghan and what the tabloid claims. If she’s really only home with a housekeeper and a baby, doing everything herself while waiting for her husband to get home, I’m actually concerned for her.

by Anonymousreply 212May 31, 2019 7:58 PM

R150 They are adding windows not replacing the ones they just renovated.

by Anonymousreply 213May 31, 2019 8:01 PM

R197 Doria didn't chaet her brother out of the house she lives in. Their dad left it to her in his will. Her brother said he understood, because Doria was a single mother and Meghan was young.

Many people had to declare bankruptcy. Thomas Markle Sr. declared bankruptcy also.

by Anonymousreply 214May 31, 2019 8:07 PM

^^^ typo: cheat

by Anonymousreply 215May 31, 2019 8:08 PM

R199 Both Prince andrew and Trump are friends of Jeffrey Epstein and both had sex w/ Epstein's underage girls.

by Anonymousreply 216May 31, 2019 8:12 PM

Kate Middleton, Prince William, Meghan Markle, and Prince Harry Will Reportedly Split Their Joint Charity

The Sussexes are expected to "break free" from the Royal Foundation.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 217May 31, 2019 9:16 PM

Omfg, it's too funny that Dan Wooton is out to OUT the grifting hoebag. I hope he's getting good commission from the palace! MORE please, Dan, I know you lurk here, this is just ACE!

by Anonymousreply 218May 31, 2019 9:35 PM

R217. Wow, Markle does not like Kate and Will at all. She wants nothing to do with them.

by Anonymousreply 219May 31, 2019 9:41 PM

r78 - no clue, but obvs. the new favorite!

by Anonymousreply 220May 31, 2019 9:44 PM

R219 I think it's the other way around.

by Anonymousreply 221May 31, 2019 9:48 PM

VF reported that Priyanka Chopra was the latest celeb to go see Archie. She promptly repudiated the story.

by Anonymousreply 222May 31, 2019 9:50 PM

r113, HRH is wonderful in that bright pink!

by Anonymousreply 223May 31, 2019 9:51 PM

R117 Princess Charlotte, Princess Augusta and Princess Elizabeth were sisters so they looked very similar to one another especially since the same artist, Thomas Gainsborough, painted the portraits. R116 and R124 were correct about the identity of the princesses. The identity of the princesses can be confirmed on the Royal Collection Trust website, www.rct.uk.

The following portrait is of the third sister, Charlotte, Princess Royal (1766-1828), painted on September 1782.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 224May 31, 2019 9:55 PM

R197 Don't forget evictions after her bankruptcy. Read in an article that in the years prior to filing for bankruptcy her income was under $10K a year. Brings up all sorts of questions such as was she in a cult/ commune, hence not there to raise Meghan during formative years? Why would an able bodied/ minded woman not choose to work in jobs that make over $10k a year? Thomas Markle is no saint but at least he stepped up to the plate and raised his daughter at a time when mom seemed to be AWOL physically if not emotionally.

by Anonymousreply 225May 31, 2019 9:56 PM

I think it's the Cambridges who want to edge out the Sussexes more than the latter wanting to leave the foundation. Will and Kate don't want to be associated or tainted with any hint of money-grubbing scandals, including Meg's penchant for promoting her rich sponsor-friends' private wellness ventures. Shit like that tend to erode a foundation's credibility and by extension the people associated with it.

by Anonymousreply 226May 31, 2019 9:59 PM

Let's see who pays for June's month of Sussex Royal exposure. The Cambridges should have got rid of the grubby pair of them sooner. " We are going to change the world! " Not likely, pair of dodgy, thirsty tramps.

by Anonymousreply 227May 31, 2019 10:03 PM

R117 The following is a group portrait of the three sisters, painted by the family's favourite artist, Thomas Gainsborough.

Gainsborough depicts Princess Augusta (1768) on the left, Princess Charlotte (1766-1820) standing in the centre, with Elizabeth (1770-1840) seated on the right.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 228May 31, 2019 10:13 PM

[quote] Certainly the animosity over status, money and Meghan meant that the split in their joint households had to be brought forward much more quickly than anticipated, so perhaps it was inevitable that their joint charity has to be split too.

This suggests Harry is resentful and envious that his brother will soon be POW and entitled to all the cookies in the Duchy jar. Was Andrew 2.0 unavoidable given the nature of being the "spare."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 229May 31, 2019 10:26 PM

At R229, end with a ?.

by Anonymousreply 230May 31, 2019 10:27 PM

Yoko has been keen to spend as many pennies in that Duchy jar as she can! Before Wills gets his hands on it....

by Anonymousreply 231May 31, 2019 10:33 PM

Another portrait of Queen Charlotte, consort of George III, King of the United and the mother of the three lovely princesses, Augusta, Charlotte and Elizabeth

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 232May 31, 2019 10:36 PM

Harry should have stayed in the military, then he'd actually have something to work towards.

by Anonymousreply 233May 31, 2019 10:36 PM

Will and Harry were always so tight with each other. It's hard to imagine that there's a rift between them, but with this split from the foundation, Will and Kate have shown complete and utter disdain of Markle. They don't like her and want nothing to do with her. I kind of think Will is a bit of a royal arsehole. No praise from me for Markle, but Will must think Markle is trash. Kate probably would have put up with having Markle be part of the "Fab Four." But Will, and Harry to a lesser degree, isn't willing to bother getting along along any longer.

Will and Harry may eventually come around and be friendly again, but it's going to take a long time and some distance between them first. But is Markle remains on the scene, it may never happen.

by Anonymousreply 234May 31, 2019 10:43 PM

I'm not so sure the brothers were "always so tight," and wonder how you know that. I think it was a lot of PR -- while Will was getting set to marry and get serious about his job Haz was stripping off in Vegas and doing as little as possible. If Will is a "royal" asshole then Haz is a dumbass prick.

by Anonymousreply 235May 31, 2019 10:49 PM

How on earth can Harry resent William for becoming POW? He has known this literally since birth. That's how the monarchy works.

by Anonymousreply 236May 31, 2019 10:56 PM

Well I for one am rubbing my hands in glee for the weekend press, probably Sunday's. And in convulsions at Yoko boinging around like a pogo stick on penises. Boing Boing Boing. They will have to spill this weekend, just a bit more, as Trump arrives on Monday. The headlines will be taken over. Give us some more DIRT before then.

by Anonymousreply 237May 31, 2019 10:57 PM

R236 Because his wife "woke" him and told him he deserved the same? #GriftingBitch

by Anonymousreply 238May 31, 2019 10:58 PM

R219 - William twigged on to who Meghan was right off. That's why she doesn't like him. William and Kate, the Yorks, Camilla - none of them can stand her. It's perfectly obvious. That's why Meghan and Harry got Frogmore Cottage rather than the grand apartment next to the Cambiridges in Kensington Palace. It was by all odds William who put his foot down and told the Queen he didn't want Meghan near his wife and children.

by Anonymousreply 239May 31, 2019 11:09 PM

Have none of you crazy queens noticed that there is a WINDOW WIDE OPEN in the recent pictures of Frogmore? Other sash windows are open at the bottom too. They are definitely there. She may have help but if she's used an agency, we won't ever see details of the hire as it won't be advertised. I think she has a nanny there to help her out when she needs to sleep/exercise and also a cleaner, at the minimum.

I think a PR person is writing up all the details PH's events on the IG. The spellings and style are English. Meghan won't be bothered with that, or the protocol for naming them etc. She will be focusing on Archie and exercising to get her figure back.

by Anonymousreply 240May 31, 2019 11:10 PM

I don't think Charles is fooled by Meggy Sharp either. His "tungsten" remark was not a term of endearment.

by Anonymousreply 241May 31, 2019 11:11 PM

' It was by all odds William who put his foot down and told the Queen he didn't want Meghan near his wife and children. '

Here we have the silly frau fantasy of Wills as a bossy Alpha. So much toxic masculinity brewing on this thread.

by Anonymousreply 242May 31, 2019 11:11 PM

When a new person joins a family, the whole family dynamic shifts.

If that person genuinely want to fit it, the accommodation for everyone is easier.

It seems pretty obvious now that Sparkle never had any interest in "fitting in". At first, one might have assumed she was not getting any "help" in learning the ropes, but it soon became plain that yes, she was getting help, but she was ignoring it.

Before the Sussex wedding, I posted that I couldn't understand why anyone would want to join the Royal Family (and I feel the same way now).

But at that time, posters disagreed vehemently and went on about all the castles, and jewels, etc.

So many people had no idea what life in the RF was really like.

I suspect William got Sparkle's number right away and her negative PR offensive on Kate, beginning with the "She wouldn't give me a ride" tale would have reinforced William's opinions.

Tiaragate, which would have circulated throughout the entire Royal Family would have shown clearly what Sparkle was all about.

And whatever stories have leaked out are only a fraction of what has really been going on.

by Anonymousreply 243May 31, 2019 11:15 PM

R240

Link to pictures, please.

by Anonymousreply 244May 31, 2019 11:16 PM

The pictures of the house with a window wide open are at R130,.

by Anonymousreply 245May 31, 2019 11:17 PM

An upstairs window is wide open, close to the left side of the picture.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 246May 31, 2019 11:19 PM

Looks like the downstairs bottom window below the one that's wide open are both ajar too. So that is proof they are there.

by Anonymousreply 247May 31, 2019 11:20 PM

R240 The text on IG is not written by anyone English....and the only person who would shoehorn Markle into everything, even events she was not at, is Markle herself.

Oh, and the Frogmore pics you’re referring to are not recent.

by Anonymousreply 248May 31, 2019 11:21 PM

R247 That picture is years old. We saw it when it was first announced they’d be moving in.

Do you honestly think the press could get close enough now to take that???

Back in your box.

by Anonymousreply 249May 31, 2019 11:23 PM

OMG those pictures of the windows open are from AGES ago. All properties need a person to open windows....especially old unoccupied ones. MOULD. There are NO recent pictures of windows open to suggest Yoko is chanting in there.

by Anonymousreply 250May 31, 2019 11:25 PM

Just wondering why don’t they fence in Frogmore Cottage. When you’re spending £3M, what’s another 10K for a tall fence and cypress trees?

by Anonymousreply 251May 31, 2019 11:34 PM

Keep it coming, girlfriends!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 252May 31, 2019 11:38 PM

Will getting as far away from Markle as he could as soon as he could is not "toxic masculinity," it's more to do with common sense and security against a pro grifter.

by Anonymousreply 253May 31, 2019 11:41 PM

r239 I think she rather likes Wills, he was the one whose poster she had on her wall after all. No she wants Will, he can't stand her. She is jealous of Kate - the way she looks at her when the mask drops is scary.

by Anonymousreply 254May 31, 2019 11:44 PM

@R58 the level of stressful of surveillance that MM is under would crush the average person she has no escape except by divorce the baby shower sealed her fate she made the monarchy look incompetent (newbies if you click the @ you can see the comment. Don't mind me, I've been around DL since the Bill Clinton years...).

RF has the power to get their Dr.s to medicate her, force clothe her in a little tweet skirt suit with a Stepford smile stand like there shake hands and wave like a fucking lady, which is what she should have done in the first place considering she studied the RF her entire life and knew better than to muck up as she has.

I do believe in various conspiracy theories which I won't go into here, I started to believe them because so much just doesn't make logical sense.

by Anonymousreply 255May 31, 2019 11:55 PM

R254-It's always fascinating when the mask slips. It did in the infamous Camilla Help video, too. There was a moment when Camilla turned her back on MM, and the glare was quite revealing. That's the thing with narcs-they can't keep up the facade 100% of the time. There are always cracks in the facade.

by Anonymousreply 256May 31, 2019 11:55 PM

R233, he was either too dumb or too lazy to try to pass the test to get to the next level in the military. Thus, he was out.

by Anonymousreply 257June 1, 2019 12:13 AM

R239, don't forget about the future King, Charles who famously referred to Smeg as "Tungsten"

by Anonymousreply 258June 1, 2019 12:15 AM

R255 is a manic, illiterate birther. Probably also believes in false flags.

by Anonymousreply 259June 1, 2019 12:19 AM

R256 - What is the Camilla Help video?

by Anonymousreply 260June 1, 2019 12:19 AM

R259, you may be right about the previous poster, but that doesn't mean that Smarkle isn't a narcissist, grifter, and whore.

by Anonymousreply 261June 1, 2019 12:21 AM

R255 I am r58 - wow - medicate her - never thought of that. I am interested in some of your conspiracy theories. I was thinking a bit deeper about Andrew and why the Royal family is even doing so much for Trump and then the Epstein Island angle brought up. Twisted webs. Trump has just been reported as saying Megs is "Nasty" - in an interview before his visit. Good grief. Oh stuff it r259 Don't spoil the fun.

by Anonymousreply 262June 1, 2019 12:21 AM

R262, if Trump said Megs is nasty, then we've found common ground.

by Anonymousreply 263June 1, 2019 12:24 AM

R260-I can't find the link, but it was from last year's garden party/Charles' birthday celebration. Camilla, Charles, MM and Harry were in a room together, and Camilla can be heard saying "help." It's bizarre yet hilarious.

by Anonymousreply 264June 1, 2019 12:37 AM

I’ve looked at that video a few times and Camilla is not saying “help”. Why would she? She is being friendly to Markle. If nothing else, Camilla has basic manners.

People have a bizarre - and very annoying - habit of seeing whatever they want to see on here.

by Anonymousreply 265June 1, 2019 12:53 AM

[quote] Trump has just been reported as saying Megs is "Nasty" - in an interview before his visit.

Really? Do you have a link?

by Anonymousreply 266June 1, 2019 12:55 AM

Oh for fuck’s sake. Just looked it up.

He’s very complimentary of her.

Again...seeing what you want to see then twisting it to suit your narrative.

He was told she refused to meet him...and he said “he didn’t know she was nasty”, but she’s a great princess blah blah.

Hardly the same thing as calling her “nasty”.

Can’t we go back to the good old days before the Royal Gossip cunts showed up? You’ve spoiled this thread.

by Anonymousreply 267June 1, 2019 12:59 AM

As an American, I'm begging you to stop. Why is the worst of us in the news? When can we put another critter into space and go about doing the work of a great nation again? (Obviously this will involve someone stuffing a gag into the mouths of Markle, Clinton, Trump, and anyone named Kardashian/Jenner)

by Anonymousreply 268June 1, 2019 1:01 AM

Wouldn't it be funny if we just never see her in public again, just a permanent gossip mill

by Anonymousreply 269June 1, 2019 1:03 AM

Trump tells The Sun: Meghan Markle is 'nasty,' Boris Johnson would do a 'very good job' as Prime Minister

Speaking on "The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore" in 2016, Markle called Trump misogynistic and said his politics are divisive, saying she would move to Canada if he won the presidency.

Trump responded, "I didn't know that she was nasty. I hope she is OK. ..." He seemed to bury the hatchet saying, "I am sure she will go excellently (as a royal). She will be very good."

R267. Trump should have just let it go. Markle made the statement in 2015. He's an asshole.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 270June 1, 2019 1:03 AM

Kate looking beautiful in jewelry. These will be part of her personal collection, so Charlotte can expect them one day:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 271June 1, 2019 1:08 AM

The story behind Kate's jewelry

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 272June 1, 2019 1:10 AM

R270, you put the crazies in their place and reminded them that Markle herself is anti Trump, but these women hate Markle for having a baby shower far more than they hate Trump for banning abortion or rolling back gay rights. They tried to distract from your logic by posting stupid jewellery pictures.

by Anonymousreply 273June 1, 2019 1:14 AM

R273, gentle reminder: this is the BRF thread.

I have lots of links to pretty tiaras if it will calm you down...

by Anonymousreply 274June 1, 2019 1:16 AM

R274, sad that you hate Markle more than you hate Trump. All the pretty baubles have addled your brain.

by Anonymousreply 275June 1, 2019 1:17 AM

Journalism is in such a shit place right now...

Whoever interviewed trump is a dick. Meghan has never stated she refused to meet trump, she's a new mother ffs and naturally wanted to stay home with her infant. Just more shit stirring to attack her and it's fucking disgusting. The british rags really want everyone to hate her.

by Anonymousreply 276June 1, 2019 1:18 AM

R274, sorry you don't know how to read the title of a thread. In my browser it says "British Royal Family Gossip: Part 64" but maybe in yours it reads "Angry vaginas with extra acid"?

Maybe this will make you feel better - the Kent branch of the BRF tiaras (includes the "Fringe" one of my personal favorites). Alas, Princess Michael has apparently mocked the Markle in her own sartorial way.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 277June 1, 2019 1:21 AM

The tabloids, especially the Express, seem to dislike her but the broadsheets, esp the Guardian, really like her.

Meghan will probably next be seen at Archie's christening, if they christen him. Is Meghan religious?

by Anonymousreply 278June 1, 2019 1:22 AM

R277, meant to snark R275. Carry on, ladies!

by Anonymousreply 279June 1, 2019 1:22 AM

R279, I see you won't respond. Do you dislike MM more than Trump? Post more jewellery and I will assume you mean you do.

by Anonymousreply 280June 1, 2019 1:23 AM

R242 - Alpha my arse. The L.A. grifter sows division wherever she goes, William and Harry were already on the outs because of her, it's not absurd to suppose William has growing authority due to his position, and the BRF probably already recognised the bitch for who she was.

You don't need to be a fucking frau to see how quickly Meghan got off on the wrong foot. That's why they got Frogmore Cottage. It's not a fantasy: it's what happened. Frogmore Cottage was NOT what Meghan Markle had in mind all those hours she spent on her knees. But that 20-room grand apartment in a grand historic palace in central London - that's more her style, not that dump of a cottage. If you think William didn't complain to HM, think again.

by Anonymousreply 281June 1, 2019 1:24 AM

R280 - it's as though you can't read. Let me help you: It's not a Trump thread.

by Anonymousreply 282June 1, 2019 1:25 AM

'Not that dump of a cottage' with ten bedrooms and at least ten other rooms. Such a dump! How did MM survive living for a year in a TWO BEDROOM COTTAGE?

R282, so you do dislike MM more than Trump! Glad you have your priorities sorted out, you silly old fool.

by Anonymousreply 283June 1, 2019 1:27 AM

Poor Markle. She just can't get a break.

by Anonymousreply 284June 1, 2019 1:32 AM

The Wanted had that one catchy song, but it was in 2011, WAY before Harry. What year did she shack up with the chef? Lead singer has nice abs. Far hotter than Dim.

Is the cult Doria was in like COS?

People have referred to a criminal record repeatedly but I have never seen any links or images. Sometimes her name is reported as Radland.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 285June 1, 2019 1:40 AM

Why so much planted PR about Rose online today?

by Anonymousreply 286June 1, 2019 1:41 AM

Queen Rose has a nice ring to it.

by Anonymousreply 287June 1, 2019 1:52 AM

Wouldn't it be great if William got tired of tame Kate and divorced her, before marrying Rose or someone else more independent and interesting. I would love to see the Kate stans here screaming and fainting.

by Anonymousreply 288June 1, 2019 1:59 AM

Both are malignant narcissists. But Trump is not a virtue signaller. Yes, I can tolerate him but not her. And dont call me names.

by Anonymousreply 289June 1, 2019 2:04 AM

Nice profile of Camilla's style:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 290June 1, 2019 2:04 AM

The primary tiara collection we can expect for Camilla and Catherine:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 291June 1, 2019 2:06 AM

[quote] Both are malignant narcissists. But Trump is not a virtue signaller. Yes, I can tolerate him but not her. And dont call me names.

Your priorities are seriously messed up if you think, in the grand scheme of things, Donald Trump is more tolerable than Meghan Markle.

by Anonymousreply 292June 1, 2019 2:07 AM

R222, that is esp interesting given how Me-Gain has used VF from the jump to manipulate Dim.

by Anonymousreply 293June 1, 2019 2:15 AM

R252, it would not surprise me if she were lying about her age.

The Duke of Dimwit has been taken for quite a ride.

by Anonymousreply 294June 1, 2019 2:17 AM

Attention all posters: do yourselves a favor and stop engaging with the unhinged “YOU HATE MEGAN MORE THAN TRUMP WAAAH!” troll. Based on its posting history today, it reeks of “Sunshine Sachs.”

by Anonymousreply 295June 1, 2019 2:22 AM

I do wonder how many people are on a payroll of sorts. This place made the rounds back when the dangling tendrils threads existed, and we know she has at least 2 pr firms

by Anonymousreply 296June 1, 2019 2:30 AM

'Both are malignant narcissists. But Trump is not a virtue signaller. Yes, I can tolerate him but not her. And dont call me names. '

I guess you don't give a fuck about women and gay men then, R289. Trump is their enemy and Markle most certainly is not.

by Anonymousreply 297June 1, 2019 2:33 AM

R295 is the exhausting, paranoid Welp Troll who thinks everyone who disagrees with her, on every single thread, is paid by a PR agency to post here.

by Anonymousreply 298June 1, 2019 2:35 AM

Rose Princess of Wales 🌹

by Anonymousreply 299June 1, 2019 2:36 AM

Muahahahahah.

R295 Your delusions of grandeur have convinced you that Sunshine Sachs spends good money responding to your silly comments in this dark corner of the web. And I am here for that kind of madness!!!!

If you do hate Meghan more than Trump, I'm the least of your problems.

by Anonymousreply 300June 1, 2019 2:36 AM

R299, I can see Queen Rose happening! Like father, like son. William hasn't been passionately in love with Kate for years and could easily stray and find his very own Camilla.

by Anonymousreply 301June 1, 2019 2:39 AM

Thanks, R295.

The volume is notable.

by Anonymousreply 302June 1, 2019 2:42 AM

Yes, R296. The “brigade” seems to come out in force whenever new dirt on Duchess Flower has dropped (or is about to drop). Rather entertaining to watch them fall over themselves trying to pick fights on these threads to get them closed down.

Don’t take the bait!

by Anonymousreply 303June 1, 2019 2:43 AM

'We know she has at least two PR firms'

The Civil List will only pay for ONE, so is she paying the others herself?

Funny to see the Welp Troll reply to his own posts.

by Anonymousreply 304June 1, 2019 2:47 AM

R303, what is your guess for several stories about Rose online today - also to get ahead of new stories about Me-Gain?

I could not read through that entire mountain of posts, but think I saw the troll posting about open windows in old photos proving that they were in residence at FC? Ha. About as credible as her bestie dropping by to meet the sprog, oops, except it was promptly denied by the acquaintance in question. Even Harry is out and about. She really does seem quite isolated.

by Anonymousreply 305June 1, 2019 2:48 AM

I'm here for the comments when Harry becomes everything that William is accused of now. In the meantime, I'm all for speculation about the fabulous jewels at the upcoming state banquet!

by Anonymousreply 306June 1, 2019 2:50 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 307June 1, 2019 2:55 AM

R305, the item about her lying about her age might be the next one to drop (if true—who knows?). Or maybe it’s just a coordinated response to the steady stream of reports about the third rate celebrities she tried to hook before landing her really big fish.

by Anonymousreply 308June 1, 2019 3:01 AM

Hilarious comments at DM.

SurfnSand, Sydney, Australia, 1 hour ago

@peamiser the Windsor's hide behind freedom of information laws, embargoes and lawyers. In addition Meghan gets her flunkies and celeb "friends" to squeal about her favourably in the media. I expect more stories like this will be leaked about Meghan, but probably the yachting stories will be kept for the divorce.

AnthonyBlanche, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1 hour ago

Shes a strange woman. Ive never had to ¿hit up¿ men on social media, or anywhere for that matter, for a date. She is so desperate and she met the one guy in the world who was even more desperate.

Kelly Y. Jelly, Whitby, United Kingdom, 2 hours ago

It would be interesting to know whom she's texting now while working on a back up plan for when this all falls to pieces. And it will, at this point, sooner than later.

lesroe, Montclair, United States, 36 minutes ago

If MM is so concerned about race, why does she only date white men.

by Anonymousreply 309June 1, 2019 3:02 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 310June 1, 2019 3:05 AM

Oh, Dear!

[quote] It would be interesting to know whom she's texting now while working on a back up plan for when this all falls to pieces. And it will, at this point, sooner than later.

by Anonymousreply 311June 1, 2019 3:05 AM

Gentleman, you misunderstand. I do find Dump more tolerable than the phony humanitarian. That does not mean I will vote for Trump. I cast two votes for Hillary in 2016, in the primary and general election.

by Anonymousreply 312June 1, 2019 3:06 AM

Talk about beating a dead horse, R312.

Commentators at DM suggested she might look to the Middle East for her next well to do benefactor. Would they be white enough for her pattern? Pulling a Janet Jackson? I could see it. RiRi is doing the same, no?

by Anonymousreply 313June 1, 2019 3:09 AM

R254 , yes about the mask dropping. She looks creepy AF when she is standing behind Kate.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 314June 1, 2019 3:10 AM

R312, it's fine to dislike Trump and Markle at the same time.

by Anonymousreply 315June 1, 2019 3:11 AM

R312 I made no assumptions about your voting habits.

Hate Meghan all you want but, I'm bewildered that you find a misogynistic homophobe who sanctioned the caging of children more tolerable than a grating but generally powerless member of the BRF.

by Anonymousreply 316June 1, 2019 3:18 AM

Givenchy's Clare Waight Keller Says She and Meghan Markle Have an "Unbreakable Bond"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 317June 1, 2019 3:43 AM

This is not a Trump thread. Please go fuck off back to Celebitchy if your panties are in a twist. Thank you.

by Anonymousreply 318June 1, 2019 3:46 AM

I am a casual observer of the Meghan hate here and find it so hilarious. Harry was the prince of all DL hearts until he married and now he’s got some stupid nickname and his wife is roundly criticized. So typical.

Regardless of her husband not being the future POW, Harry and Meghan will be the most popular royals, BY FAR, in the US. Seeing as how the US seems to be the only kid who still will sit with the Brits at lunch, that means a lot. The royals only value is in their tourist draw and the good feeing they are able to generate in other countries and as it stands now, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex hold the trump card.

by Anonymousreply 319June 1, 2019 3:51 AM

Those comments are funny. I thought the dislike of meghan wasn't due to race yet comment after comment is about exactly that. Meghan literally came out of a white man's nuts...in the uk, I can tell you mixed boys with white mums tend to only date white women but that is perfectly ok. Jealous white women hate when WOC date high status white men, even if their own father's are white like Meghan's.

by Anonymousreply 320June 1, 2019 3:53 AM

I remember a few Olympics ago (possibly more than a few) there was a speedskating race in which one skater in particular trailed the whole time. At the last minute one of the frontrunners crashed, and all the others then crashed into him and the one in last sailed over the finish line and won the gold medal. That's Meghan Markle. Look who the fuck she was hitting up on Twitter. D-Listers. The D-est of D-Listers. Look at the "calligraphy" in that letter to her dad. Look closely. Not only is it not calligraphy, a lot of it looks like a child's attempt at handwriting ffs. And she used that same style when signing the condolence book for NZ. This chick won. She won so, so, so fucking big. Ghosted by Matt Cardle and falls into an engagement and then a marriage to a fucking prince! I'm impressed. I'm not impressed by her. I'm impressed by how actually shit she is in relation to the husband she scored.

You know who looks like the real mug here? Harry. I almost feel sorry for the ginger prat. HOW is it possible that he fell for someone it looks like literally everyone else in his family and a decent portion of the public saw right through?! Like I knew he had a rep for being nor smart but GODDAMN.

Don't actually feel sorry for him though. Made your bed, son. Enjoy sleeping in it.

Also not totally surprised he seems to have come to his Will-envy somewhat late in life. I spoke before about whether or not the 'normal' (ish) childhood Charles and Di insisted on foisting on those boys would end up serving them or not. It's going to be 100 years before we can answer that properly, and most likely many more, but I'm not convinced that raising sons to buy into the modern, egalitarian 'we're all equal' world is the greatest idea if those sons are, in fact, strictly and rigidly NOT equal. It's like Harry actually believed he was the cool, relaxed 'people's prince.' Like he bought his own hype. "I don't need to be king! I can do all this other cool stuff whilst being the spare!" Gets into his thirties and probably had a moment or two of real, true understanding. Of fully grasping how much more William (and William's wife and children) will be afforded when compared to his own.

There was no sweetening that bitter pill, I don't think. And I'm not at all convinced that trying to pretend it wasn't going to be bitter was a great idea for those in charge of raising ol' Haz not to be fucking useless.

by Anonymousreply 321June 1, 2019 3:55 AM

R321 is the very definition of “pressed!”

by Anonymousreply 322June 1, 2019 3:57 AM

R321 here. We can talk about it if you like, R322. I suspect you're just here to do the usual stan thing of popping in, 'you jellying' all over the thread and then leaving again (why? why? I don't ever pop into anti threads for celebs I heart) but for real, what of it if I don't like MM? And you do? So what? It's celeb gossip. It's light entertainment. If you're not entertained, you don't have to be here.

Unless someone is holding you hostage and forcing you to participate. In which case blink twice.

by Anonymousreply 323June 1, 2019 4:00 AM

I can hear the howls of laughter coming from Camilla and Anne and Andrew saying "Well at least we can agree with that awful President Trump on SOMETHING"

by Anonymousreply 324June 1, 2019 4:01 AM

I've agreed with Trumpy on 2 things over the past couple of weeks and it's not cool. I can at least look at photos of MM without having to immediately look away and feel sick. Can't do that with Cheetolini.

by Anonymousreply 325June 1, 2019 4:04 AM

R321 Dear diary...

You can just tell r321 is losing her shit for each word she types. I can feel the anger and frustration from here lol "how dare you do this to me you ginger dimwit harkleSPARKLEFUCKWITHMARKLE!! GAAH!!!"

by Anonymousreply 326June 1, 2019 4:06 AM

LOL. pls see the link R326

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 327June 1, 2019 4:10 AM

Face it, she is nasty. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Was he right to comment? OF course not, but it's fucking hilarious how outraged the Megstans are, and I'm enjoying it.

by Anonymousreply 328June 1, 2019 4:10 AM

R321 R323 You may be over invested. FYI this isn't an anti thread. It's a BRF thread. It's open to stans, haters, conspiracy nutters, frauen, tiara lovers, fans of Randy Andy, haters of paedo Andy, lovers of Hermes scarves, measurers of coat wrist lengths, pop. psychologists, forensic video analysts and so many more.

by Anonymousreply 329June 1, 2019 4:16 AM

When fiction becomes truth.

It's time for the RF to step up and put an end to this character assassination. They want to use meghan for good publicity and have her work but they don't do anything to defend her from harmful lies created and promoted by the media. The lies have now reached the GP. And it is taken as fact.

This will all backfire....but not on meghan.

Woe unto the house of windsor.

by Anonymousreply 330June 1, 2019 4:18 AM

Nobody is going to drop the BRF to defend the honour of a narc lying american divorcee that has won little friends in the taxpaying uk

by Anonymousreply 331June 1, 2019 4:21 AM

Isaiah 5:20 King James Version (KJV)

20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

by Anonymousreply 332June 1, 2019 4:22 AM

The Megstans are now quoting the Bible to defend their grifter whore?

by Anonymousreply 333June 1, 2019 4:24 AM

Woe unto the House Of Windsor.

For their silence in the face of evil. For failing to protect their blood. For watching as a woman with child is stabbed again and again by evil forces in high places.

They shall now all suffer.

The Prince of Wales shall never see the throne. Neither will his whore Camilla.

The Duke of Cambridge, William, son of Diana, WILL divorce Kate The Keen Middleton and her grifting family. They will become destitute. Thrown out of high society and scorned for the rest of their sorry lives.

Their children shall never see the throne. Born out of surrogates they are not qualified as they are not legitimate.

The pedo Andy of York WILL be banished and sent to the tower (read: prison).

The rest, including the Queen, will see all of their material wealth go back to their rightful owners.

by Anonymousreply 334June 1, 2019 4:37 AM

Ooookay then.

by Anonymousreply 335June 1, 2019 4:54 AM

Omg r334

by Anonymousreply 336June 1, 2019 4:57 AM

Ha ha, you tragic Trump preferring trolls are being ridiculed on the Trump Called MM Nasty thread.

by Anonymousreply 337June 1, 2019 5:10 AM

Love the story of MM being in contact with Max George. Makes me hope that girl does actually have some taste in men and down the line there'll be good gossip about her having affairs with hotties while publicly showering her dim, balding, beady-eyed hubby with affection.

by Anonymousreply 338June 1, 2019 5:17 AM

R256, R260, R264: the supposed Camilla "help" video is yet another example of people's biases causing them to read things into situations. I stupidly clicked on the original post (sorry, also don't know where it is now) but it is uneventful and no, Camilla isn't dramatically mouthing "help" at her underlings.

by Anonymousreply 339June 1, 2019 5:23 AM

R339, why would she? The old battleaxe is more than a match for stripling Meg.

by Anonymousreply 340June 1, 2019 5:26 AM

R334, now that is some crazy I can appreciate.

by Anonymousreply 341June 1, 2019 5:29 AM

@262 I think everything stinks and don't mind stans/sugars I just block them at all sites... Ask yourself why would a reigning monarchy allow a hustler to rock and roll them? Harry is the loose ink aka Hewitt's bastard,

by Anonymousreply 342June 1, 2019 7:40 AM

I just hope his "even" cuntiself goes everywhere, right?

by Anonymousreply 343June 1, 2019 7:50 AM

Right, Camilla didn't "mouth" "help" after having to come in contact with Markle that day, she SAID it. I would bet that the two of them have not spoken since then, except perhaps "very nice baby, bye now." Her step-mother-inlaw is not a friend and confidante, put it that way.

by Anonymousreply 344June 1, 2019 9:53 AM

Actually, in that Help video, Camilla says "I can't bare her" also, to the camera as she walks off shot.

by Anonymousreply 345June 1, 2019 9:59 AM

You are all beastly!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 346June 1, 2019 10:01 AM

Racists are red

Hoes are blue

Sad fraus hate Meghan

She says fuck you.

by Anonymousreply 347June 1, 2019 10:05 AM

Translates as " I'm onto you, Yoko. "

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 348June 1, 2019 10:06 AM

Soooo, the Sussex Royal Insta is "shining a light " on Pride, this month, with their chosen charities. She has not named them, but if you click on the link, then click on the picture , the charities become visible.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 349June 1, 2019 10:14 AM

Meghan is probably cuddled up with her husband and baby atm, not giving a damn about some nutty fraus obsessively stalking her and typing about her on every internet comment section they can find.

by Anonymousreply 350June 1, 2019 10:26 AM

Rare footage of the Duchess's tentative steps into the music industry, circa the time she was messaging X-Factors and Boy Banders.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 351June 1, 2019 10:30 AM

Princess Anne is one of the lads.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 352June 1, 2019 10:34 AM

Nobody believes that narcissist Markle has a healthy relationship with her mentally ill stunted mark. And the post pregnancy hormones are putting a lovely hysterical shine on Megsys crap PR. All in all, things are not going very well.

by Anonymousreply 353June 1, 2019 10:36 AM

I have the feeling Meghan is literally writing the Sussex IG posts. It's kinda cute, but the following thing is weird. I would just post links to the charities. It's a little weird for them to not be following the other royal IG profiles, the household division, etc.

by Anonymousreply 354June 1, 2019 10:40 AM

Poor Kate.

Her husband is probably with Rose in their secret hideaway, probably some cottage somewhere owned by one of wills friends. Shades of war of the wales....you know what they say; like father, like son.

Things are not going well with them at all. I see a divorce between the cambs in the near future. And they (windsors) with the help of the media, will crush the middleton-goldsmiths so much that kate will not be able to pull the victim act and she was never beloved like diana so only william will come out smelling like roses.

by Anonymousreply 355June 1, 2019 10:46 AM

Kate is an idiot if she does get divorced. If I was blessed to be able to nurse on the sweet spunk of a future king, I would humble myself and go with the flow. Then I would flip him over and eat that hairy, high and mighty hole.

by Anonymousreply 356June 1, 2019 10:55 AM

William is with Kate and the kids at Sandrigham on leave . Its no school for the kids . And she is not poor like M . She has a loving husband and beautiful kids . God knows how Archie looks . That’s why they keep him away sugar .

by Anonymousreply 357June 1, 2019 10:58 AM

Princess Anne will just go the ever loving fuck, wouldn't she?

by Anonymousreply 358June 1, 2019 11:01 AM

[quote] God knows how Archie looks . That’s why they keep him away sugar .

We're trash talking newborns now? Nice to see you keeping it classy, Svetlana.

by Anonymousreply 359June 1, 2019 11:15 AM

When we are gonna see Archie ? All that mumbo jumbo at his birth ! Just a cover up for the surrogate they used !

by Anonymousreply 360June 1, 2019 11:18 AM

Svetlana you don't need to be coy. Start ranting about silicone reborn baby Darren. I know you want to...

by Anonymousreply 361June 1, 2019 11:21 AM

The DM comments on the Max George story are killing me, lol.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 362June 1, 2019 11:28 AM

Wagner off X Factor, lol lol lol

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 363June 1, 2019 11:32 AM

Wagner, I'm howling

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 364June 1, 2019 11:33 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 365June 1, 2019 11:47 AM

Harry looks like he's doing the walk of shame in R365's pics.

by Anonymousreply 366June 1, 2019 12:02 PM

I bet he's crawling around in shame, today, R366. What an absolute plonker he is looking during this run of revelations about his wife.

by Anonymousreply 367June 1, 2019 12:05 PM

Beginning to think the characterization of Harry on the Windsors show was not an overblown exaggeration. He really does seem to be that dim, or close to it.

by Anonymousreply 368June 1, 2019 12:23 PM

Yup.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 369June 1, 2019 12:31 PM

He was also dim and loutish in that (very prescient) play, "King Charles III." To the point that I scoffed at the characterization, questioned why the playwright was making a not-credible cartoon buffoon out of Harry. But he was on the money.

by Anonymousreply 370June 1, 2019 12:32 PM

It's funny now to watch people struggle with the addition of Trump into the Meghan drama (see: other thread). Oooooh, who to hate more. I'm just enjoying the shitshow.

Is Harry in on any of these meetings with Trump? Will he pull some coded stunt to avenge his lady's honor? Will Trump and William suddenly develop a warm, friendly bond? Stay tuned!

by Anonymousreply 371June 1, 2019 12:36 PM

I love “The Windsors.” It has that great “Strangers With Candy” sensibility to it.

by Anonymousreply 372June 1, 2019 12:43 PM

The stupid moronic megastans don't seem to understand that Trump is not the president of the world, you do realise that other countries exist with their own democratically elected leaders. Do you get that most people in Britain actually don't give a flying fuck about him, yes he's an idiot but wtf has that to do with any person in Britain's life? So asking people do they hate MM more than Trump is stupid and irrelevant to the average British person. Trump doesn't cost us any money, we don't have to pay for his lifestyle but we do have to pay for MM and her extravagant lifestyle.

Stop calling people who don't like MM Trump lovers, we don't care, to use your own words "he's not my President"....literally.

by Anonymousreply 373June 1, 2019 1:07 PM

The Queen is at Epsom races , I hope we get to see her cheering on her own horse Sextant, she is always very animated!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 374June 1, 2019 1:25 PM

The City of Paris still thinks of Diana.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 375June 1, 2019 1:35 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 376June 1, 2019 1:40 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 377June 1, 2019 1:42 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 378June 1, 2019 1:44 PM

R283 - It was a run-down dump split up into small suites. And I believe it was turned into a five-bedroom, not a 10-bedroom place for the Sussexes on the backs of Biritsh taxpayers, in a highly inconvenient location that isn't Central London or real countryside, to which the Sussexes were exiled - when they have to stay in London they have a couple of rooms at BP. Kate and William got the huge grand apartment in Kensington Palace AND the beautiful country home that really does have 10 bedrooms and really IS in the countryside. They got both: the huge grand central London base AND the huge country home in Norfolk. That's what Meghan Markle thought she would be getting too. Frogmore Cottage is undistinuished, a made-over dump, they have no real base any longer in the capital, and unless Charles buys them one or their rich pals the Clooneys loan them one, no real country home, either.

It wasn't what she wanted and it was shoved down her throat. Maybe she shouldn't have argued with the Queen about which tiara she could have at her wedding - which was also a painfully second-rate affair.

by Anonymousreply 379June 1, 2019 1:44 PM

R371 - Yes, Harry is attending the luncheon with Trump and the Queen and other members of the BRF.

by Anonymousreply 380June 1, 2019 1:46 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 381June 1, 2019 1:46 PM

Wonder if Harry will wear pressed clothes for the occasion? Or be a wrinkled mess?

Did the people he had to take care of such things also quit?

by Anonymousreply 382June 1, 2019 1:49 PM

Wouldn't it be delightful if Harry had a hissy fit about Trump's statement about his wife and cancelled his appearance during the State Visit?

by Anonymousreply 383June 1, 2019 1:50 PM

Harry isn't attending the state banquet, just the luncheon. Ha, that WOULD be funny R383

by Anonymousreply 384June 1, 2019 1:51 PM

Harry trying to insult Trump back.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 385June 1, 2019 1:53 PM

r108 You mean Queen Charlotte of the notorious bad breath?

by Anonymousreply 386June 1, 2019 1:54 PM

Andrew is a Colonel of the Grenadier Guards. The photo was taken at Windsor Castle.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 387June 1, 2019 1:58 PM

Here's a little taste of what happens during the Trooping The Colour ceremony. Andrew is in practice mode.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 388June 1, 2019 1:59 PM

"Gimme this, you'll never wear it!"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 389June 1, 2019 2:08 PM

Anyone else see the photo of Andrew with Bea, Yuge, Jack, Edo, and Fergie from this afternoon?

As usual, both girls look simply ghastly - they appear, perhaps thankfully, to be unaware that they were both hit over the head with the Dumpy Stick at birth, and therefore never dress to offset it.

But the real point of the photo is Edo - it's quite obvious that Bea is determined to marry him and he's happy to oblige. Look for an annnouncement in October and yet another spring wedding at St. George's Chapel next April.

Just look at the happy grin on Edo's face - anyone who thinks that grin is about Bea is moronic.

by Anonymousreply 390June 1, 2019 2:09 PM

In case anyone's missed them ^^^^

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 391June 1, 2019 2:14 PM

Harry is looking ghastly.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 392June 1, 2019 2:16 PM

Just saw even more Rose stories online. Quite vicious.

by Anonymousreply 393June 1, 2019 2:16 PM

Haha, the second photo R392 when a box dye goes wrong. That green tinge is awful.

by Anonymousreply 394June 1, 2019 2:18 PM

The humiliation factor must be dreadful, R392. Even our Dim must now have some perception of how he was played. Sap thought she loved him. Funny, yet sad. It is awful that there is a child in the middle of this mess.

by Anonymousreply 395June 1, 2019 2:18 PM

The "Will Cheated With Rose" stories seem to rear their ugly heads every time something negative about Duchess Yoko pops up. The Megstans are so predictable in their deflection. It's like clockwork.

by Anonymousreply 396June 1, 2019 2:20 PM

To celebrate Archie's birth, the Commonwealth country of Canada will donate $100,000 to charity.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 397June 1, 2019 2:22 PM

Has harry aged really quickly or is it just obvious now? I swear he looked better even a year ago

by Anonymousreply 398June 1, 2019 2:22 PM

Some outlet called SheKnows is really going at her hard. Wonder if her husband will take any action at some point?

by Anonymousreply 399June 1, 2019 2:23 PM

Uh oh, that won't work out well MM has asked that donations go to her first, so she can hand them out/ skim them R397

by Anonymousreply 400June 1, 2019 2:24 PM

Harry looks like a dissolute Muppet.

Drugs, drink and narcs will do that to you.

So will envy, sloth and bitterness.

by Anonymousreply 401June 1, 2019 2:24 PM

"What Meghan wants, Meghan gets."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 402June 1, 2019 2:24 PM

R399, I've just read that one, but it's softened up towards the end. Harsh through the piece, though.

by Anonymousreply 403June 1, 2019 2:25 PM

In honor of Pride month, Meg has requested that you donate to her good friend’s conversion therapy business.

by Anonymousreply 404June 1, 2019 2:28 PM

I'm happy the Cambridges will be with their family in Norfolk. It's better to be far away from the Trump Taint. Very smart move.

by Anonymousreply 405June 1, 2019 2:29 PM

Agree, R403, and she is a private citizen.

I would bet $ that Me-Gain was the source of these rumors as rumors of her salad tossing tape broke.

She seems to hate Catherine.

Imagine how different things would be if he married a more normal seeming woman, like Sophie? Or kept fleeing to Africa with Adam?

R404, that cannot be true. Do you have a link? Wonder if she gets kick backs for these promos?

by Anonymousreply 406June 1, 2019 2:30 PM

It was so hot and sunny at Epsom, the Queen had to take off her coat and wear sunglasses. Swipe for photos in the link below.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 407June 1, 2019 2:32 PM

I remember an interview around the time of the Cambridge wedding, wedding fever was everywhere, and MM was asked which of the princes she preferred. Her answer? William. Maybe one of our DL sleuths will track it down.

by Anonymousreply 408June 1, 2019 2:32 PM

As presiding officer, I thought Andrew would have been in an undress order frock for today's review. I think it's because I've seen previous colonel reviews where the presiding officers (i.e. the royal colonels) wore the undress order frock. But he's in full scarlet tunic and bearskin. The Garter riband/sash looks magnificent. Maybe the big black frock would have been too damn hot.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 409June 1, 2019 2:35 PM

I saw that too r408. She's so cringe it's almost beyond belief.

by Anonymousreply 410June 1, 2019 2:36 PM

You wouldn't catch ME doing that, R389.

by Anonymousreply 411June 1, 2019 2:37 PM

Someone mentioned Sheknoks above, so I had a look and their most recent article is a comparison of Catherine's, Diana's and Meghan's handwriting. Meghan's handwriting looks like the Hallmark company printing machine did it for her, with the other two looking, well, human and interesting.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 412June 1, 2019 2:41 PM

R390, I think they both look fine. I very much like Bea's look, and Euge's dress suits her, though it's a bit mumsy.

How would you have them dress to "offset" their figures? Caftans? Leggings and oversized t-shirts?

by Anonymousreply 413June 1, 2019 2:45 PM

R398, Harry is looking more and more like his father. And his eyes seem to be converging in the middle.

by Anonymousreply 414June 1, 2019 2:48 PM

[quote] Meghan's handwriting looks like the Hallmark company printing machine did it for her

That's a funny insult. "Your handwriting looks intentionally romantic and it's so consistent that it looks like it could have been printed by a machine."

R385's insult wins.

by Anonymousreply 415June 1, 2019 2:55 PM

Only three UK organisations being followed by SlutSex Insta, as far as I can see.

by Anonymousreply 416June 1, 2019 2:57 PM

Which is the conversion therapy group?

by Anonymousreply 417June 1, 2019 2:59 PM

Pity she can't truly mean what she does, why not causes that need more help? Smaller causes? The Michael Causer Foundation and similar. She obviously didn't ask her obnoxious husband to help her.... Prince Harry to fellow soldier " Are you feeling a little gay? Queer? "

by Anonymousreply 418June 1, 2019 3:04 PM

That was the same time he used the " Paki" word. Never any excuses.

by Anonymousreply 419June 1, 2019 3:05 PM

R408, when she was asked "William or Harry", she actually replied "Harry". She might have had a crush on William when she was an adolescent (lots of girls did), but over the past 10 years or so, especially after Vegas, Harry has been perceived as the "cooler" brother. So of course Meghan chose the "cool" answer over the "married" answer.

by Anonymousreply 420June 1, 2019 3:13 PM

They are both awful and actually seem quite well suited.

by Anonymousreply 421June 1, 2019 3:22 PM

Trump is probably jealous of the pics of Obama hanging out in William's apartment with the William, Kate, Harry, and bathrobe-wearing George.

by Anonymousreply 422June 1, 2019 3:26 PM

[quote] We talked about....how she wanted to carve out a new idea of a way to dress for a royal...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 423June 1, 2019 3:34 PM

Meghan made the political comments on American television in mid-late 2016 - a period during which she now claims she was already dating Harry. So, she's either a total fucking idiot or she wasn't an 'official' girlfriend at the time or wasn't expecting to become one.

Given here behaviour since, I'll go with total fucking idiot.

I'm absolutely sure that you would have never heard a whisper about who Cressida Bonas likes or doesn't like. This discussion wouldn't be taking place if Meghan was not in fact dim as brick. Which, while it puts her in Mensa-levels next to Harry, doesn't say much. What a fool she is.

by Anonymousreply 424June 1, 2019 3:34 PM

The Queen and her four children (aka The Time When All My Boys Had Hair)

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 425June 1, 2019 3:37 PM

Don't Mess With Camouflage Anne. She's a Badass Princess. LOL.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 426June 1, 2019 3:38 PM

Bandwagoner.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 427June 1, 2019 3:38 PM

"I wonder if Harry and Meghan have moved into that tiny Frogmore Cottage yet?"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 428June 1, 2019 3:43 PM

R427 - that Attitude story was WAY before the Sussex Royal support of the LGBT on their Instagram. So if anyone is a "Bandwagoner", it's the Sussex pair.

by Anonymousreply 429June 1, 2019 3:45 PM

How ridiculous would it be for Harry to be jealous of William. Harry might not be given the biggest castles to live in, but he still has it better than 99.9 percent of the rest of the world. Work for a few hours a month. The "work" involves talking with people who adore you and meeting famous people. Then find some great hobbies to fill the rest of your time; learn an instrument, practice painting. Fill your house (which is bigger than 99.9 of the rest of the population members' houses) with the things you love. The same institution that places William above Harry has still given Harry a great life. He doesn't even have to go to to college or work 9 to 5. But, he could...if he wanted to.

by Anonymousreply 430June 1, 2019 3:46 PM

Thats what I meant R429

by Anonymousreply 431June 1, 2019 3:46 PM

So M is a fashion icon now ? In what part of the world is that ?

by Anonymousreply 432June 1, 2019 3:50 PM

Exactly right, r430, and yet Harry, and now his Megain, are so obviously bitter at not having more, more, MORE!

by Anonymousreply 433June 1, 2019 3:53 PM

Is it the Duchy money that MM is beavering through? The money that William will inherit?

by Anonymousreply 434June 1, 2019 3:56 PM

Hello Randy Andy fan. I spy a young RA at R425, and see what you mean now. Mworr.

by Anonymousreply 435June 1, 2019 3:59 PM

So far, over 37% of DL think that Meghan will make her first public appearance after Archie's birth at her baby's christening. Do you think she'll be able to stay out of the spotlight for a couple of months?

by Anonymousreply 436June 1, 2019 4:07 PM

r434, MM is beavering through the income on the roughly 15 million pounds that Diana left (33 all told) and the Sovereign Grant the Queen and Prince Charles allow them.

She spent nearly a MILLION pounds on clothing in a SINGLE year. Pounds, mind you, not dollars.

Kate spends a quarter of that, even though she has far more resources at her disposal as wife to one heir and mother to another.

I don't know what Dim and Dimmer are playing at, but it Won't End Well.

by Anonymousreply 437June 1, 2019 4:14 PM

Most of the money diana left is locked up behind a trust, and Harry probably can't touch the principal.

by Anonymousreply 438June 1, 2019 4:16 PM

r438, Yes. Note I said 'the income on"

by Anonymousreply 439June 1, 2019 4:20 PM

R409 Andy looks magnificent astride the horse, I wish I was the horse

by Anonymousreply 440June 1, 2019 4:21 PM

R321 is a treasure!

by Anonymousreply 441June 1, 2019 4:29 PM

R334 - I am disappointed you didn't finish with "I'll get you my pretty, and your little dog Toto, too!"

The entire time I read the comment I thought I could hear monkeys flying overhead. So strange.

by Anonymousreply 442June 1, 2019 4:33 PM

Using nicknames for the members of the British royal family is a leading sign of being a pathetic shut-in.

by Anonymousreply 443June 1, 2019 4:35 PM

R389 - hilarious. Obviously someone having some fun - those Cambridges are very photogenic.

by Anonymousreply 444June 1, 2019 4:42 PM

One horse to another.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 445June 1, 2019 4:46 PM

r442 wins this entire thread

by Anonymousreply 446June 1, 2019 5:06 PM

The angry Narc Troll is hilarious. She attributes nearly every characteristic in existence to 'Narcs'.

by Anonymousreply 447June 1, 2019 5:14 PM

Agree, 446.

We stan you, R442!

They really are well matched - so privileged, yet seething with resentment. Empty, yet grasping for feelings of superiority. Believing that SM likes and celebrity has some sort of genuine value. They make Kim K and her quest to free convicts seem to have genuine gravitas. Funny how she also seems to maintain family bonds and friendship, cannot be that hard.

by Anonymousreply 448June 1, 2019 5:28 PM

Facebook has deleted accounts originating in Iran that were targeting Princess Eugenie. WTF would Iran want to target Eugenie? Is she that important?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 449June 1, 2019 5:38 PM

Great post, R321. I agree that Meghan pulled off an astounding achievement, one of the great climbs of all time. Imagine, one minute a rank-and-file actress worried about your next gig, competing with everyone, having endured all the humiliation and rejection the Hollywood creeps have to offer. Next thing you know, you're a freaking Duchess, one of the most photographed women in the world; you've snagged the most eligible bachelor on the planet (yes, he was, at least he was hyped that way), and you're hanging out in palaces with the Queen of England and her heirs. It's breathtaking.

Imagine the electric thrill she must have felt at the moment she knew Harry was falling in love with her: "Omg omg omg omg, this could really happen, I could be a Princess, join the royal fucking family, omg omg. Steady, steady." Then when she got the prize, she probably relished rubbing it the nose of every casting director who turned her down, every slob who made a pass, every bigger star who treated her like a nobody. I can't wait for her inevitable visit to LA.

Her life really is a TV movie, based on a novel by Sidney Sheldon, Jackie Collins, or Dominick Dunne.

by Anonymousreply 450June 1, 2019 5:41 PM

Thank you for that, R442!!

by Anonymousreply 451June 1, 2019 5:41 PM

But, R450, she seems to be shooting herself in the foot, repeatedly, no? Her time in the RF seems to be on a very short trajectory, due solely to her own behavior.

by Anonymousreply 452June 1, 2019 5:49 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 453June 1, 2019 5:51 PM

Andrew's teeth match his daughter's yellow dress. It is nice to see that type of colour coordination.

And Meghan is in very good company; Trump had to resort to calling HRC "nasty" when she overtook him during a debate. That was all he could come up with. Sad man.

Maybe Tiffany Trump will give birth right in the middle of theQueen's banquet hall. Can't wait to see the baby Trump balloon flying over London again.

by Anonymousreply 454June 1, 2019 5:52 PM

R452 - All I know is, she's IN.

by Anonymousreply 455June 1, 2019 5:52 PM

'Funny how she also seems to maintain family bonds and friendship, cannot be that hard.'

Ewwww the Welp Troll speaks!

Makes irrelevant comparisons with other celebs - tick

Poor English, so misses out pronouns frequently - tick

Misogynist - tick

Thinks Meghan is gay with Jessica - tick

Goes from thread to thread insulting Harry Styles - tick

Is a Larrie - tick

by Anonymousreply 456June 1, 2019 5:52 PM

R321, I agree with your take on how Harry came to be envious of Will so late in life. For 30+ years, he experienced the upside of being the spare. Now the tables are turning and he's beginning to grasp the considerable downside.

by Anonymousreply 457June 1, 2019 5:53 PM

R453 That poor lady in pink. Good news - I'm pictured curtseying to the Queen. Bad news- me bum looks enormous.

She probably looked very lovely from the front.

by Anonymousreply 458June 1, 2019 5:53 PM

R452 is also the Welp Troll. Always has a French syntax: 'shot herself in the foot repeatedly, no?'

The WORST poster on Datalounge.

She forecasts that Meg will be jettisoned from the BRF just like she forecast Harry Styles and his bandmate would get married.

by Anonymousreply 459June 1, 2019 5:58 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 460June 1, 2019 5:59 PM

But, R455, it seems, not for long and that she will be leaving with her grasped for image in tatters. She is undoing her good fortune at a rapid pace.

Funny about VF, they should have given her a wide berth. Now they have no credibility and are no better than kneepads, taking placed PR. Have we figured out who is paying for it yet?

by Anonymousreply 461June 1, 2019 6:00 PM

I think R459 is paying for it, R461.

by Anonymousreply 462June 1, 2019 6:05 PM

haHA

by Anonymousreply 463June 1, 2019 6:15 PM

Jesus you fraus make no fucking sense. You claim MM grifted and grasped her way into the BRF but now she wants to abandon her royal child and go back to LA in shame? Or she will be forced out? Your subtext is SKIPPY. You think they will discover the kid is not Harry's.

by Anonymousreply 464June 1, 2019 6:17 PM

R462, the BTF costs the tax payer 69p a year each. Nobody gives a fuck about it.

by Anonymousreply 465June 1, 2019 6:18 PM

You're right r353. I wonder how long it will take Harry Steppingtone to wise up

by Anonymousreply 466June 1, 2019 6:21 PM

Loving a narc will suck the sense of humor right out of a person.

by Anonymousreply 467June 1, 2019 6:29 PM

I never noticed it before, but that first picture of Harry (from the side) on the airplane - he has a ski nose like Bob Hope.

by Anonymousreply 468June 1, 2019 6:31 PM

Perhaps, he does seem quite invested. And here I thought it was simply an obsession with blokes named Harry that caused him to post hundreds if not thousands of times on DL?

Yet he claims he is not paid to spend so much time here. Hmmm.

by Anonymousreply 469June 1, 2019 6:35 PM

I have revised my opinion, his obsession with me is growing and my name is NOT Harry.

Your theory is gaining legs, R462, Mwah!

by Anonymousreply 470June 1, 2019 6:38 PM

Sunshine Sachs hiring Social Media Analyst in New York, New York ... https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/social-media-analyst-at-sunshine-sachs-1236806125 Anonymous View Sunshine SachsNew York, New York, United States ... Community managing clients' social media channels – monitoring for mentions and responding...

by Anonymousreply 471June 1, 2019 6:40 PM

Maybe our very on troll is on a short trajectory himself. He is quite poor at his job, as well. Is that why the strong identification with Me-Gain?

by Anonymousreply 472June 1, 2019 6:43 PM

own troll

by Anonymousreply 473June 1, 2019 6:43 PM

I believe the Troll Troll is actually a she of the Celebitchy variety, but I could be wrong.

by Anonymousreply 474June 1, 2019 6:48 PM

Btw, a couple of royal weddings on the European Royals Discussion Thread if anyone cares to go look. Including Charlotte Casiraghi, daughter of Princess Caroline.

by Anonymousreply 475June 1, 2019 6:50 PM

Who is this idiot on here who thinks she can tell everyone how they should feel about MEgain? This is a clear frau mentality with the stupid Larrie/Skippie invectives, an are falling as flat as MEEE's pr campaign to get people to like her.

And the poster upthread who tried to make a point that people who criticize Megalomaniac MUST dislike the Cheetoh less has played herself by showing a very myopic American thought process. Most people in the world hardly give Trump a thought as he is not their president.

by Anonymousreply 476June 1, 2019 6:52 PM

Euro royals thread

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 477June 1, 2019 6:52 PM

Has been here for years, R474. Think the Celebitchy posters are more recent?

I seem to get under his skin, wonder which posts were too close to the truth?

They are all easily blocked.

Do we think Me-Gain and Harry will be relocated to another continent in 2019? Will she try for spawn 2 as a delaying tactic? What enforcement techniques will Lord Doom employ? These are the questions that matter, not the hourly rate of the blocked troll.

by Anonymousreply 478June 1, 2019 6:55 PM

Thanks, R478. I don't block them because they don't bother me and are sometimes even amusing, as in the "Woe unto the House of Windsor" gem.

by Anonymousreply 479June 1, 2019 7:09 PM

The Yorks playing happy family! Fergie has her son-in-law and Edo shopped out of this photo.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 480June 1, 2019 7:09 PM

Sarah, Duchess of York, my favorite of the entire BRF.

by Anonymousreply 481June 1, 2019 7:19 PM

I'm sorry my fave, Edo, got cut out. But it is a nice family portrait. Yorks really presenting a united front these days, aren't they?

by Anonymousreply 482June 1, 2019 7:21 PM

She's the most unpopular woman in the world.

And deservedly so. She's foul.

by Anonymousreply 483June 1, 2019 7:25 PM

R321 here (AKA Laduree Macaron Tower Troll, AKA Randy Andy Fan Stan) - thank you for comments. Someone called me pressed when I posted and I had to retire to my fainting (i.e. weeping) couch for a spell. Pressed! The nerve!

In truth, I just love armchair psychologizing and speculating. And you know what, Stans? I don't even believe any of those videos actually show people being openly rude or dismissive towards MM. Not the investiture one (was that it?), not the more recent 'Camilla Cries Help' one - none of them. AND I think she had a real baby that is biologically the child of her and her husband. AND I think her ginger hubs is toooootally into her. I think she may or may not be living at FrogCott but would not be surprised either way.

But I do admit to a fascination with MM herself, as detailed in my post. Not a fascination that would exist if she hadn't married into the RF, admittedly, but one that has blossomed in the way a similar interest might arise if one were to witness a shark living amidst a herd of alpacas. It's not that sharks are so interesting it's just - damn! How did that shark manage to get in with those alpacas, you know? And what will it do now it's there? And wow that shark was aiming for some basic-ass city park squirrels before it got lucky with that dim but wealthy alpaca!

So. I think Meg will try to get pg again ASAP. Not certain of it, mainly because a)I think she was one of those unfortunate women whose body got really fucked by pregnancy (and I speak as a woman whose body got really fucked by pregnancy) and b) she looked properly shook at that Baby Presentation In A Castle thingie. But overall I think she will.

Also think Bea and Yuge look fine. Not like beautiful models, because they're not, but fine.

Oh, I am also not seeing any posts from the Troll Troll but if she accuses anyone of being a Troll Troll Troll will someone please inform me so I can chuckle? Ty.

by Anonymousreply 484June 1, 2019 7:26 PM

R481 My favourite is Charlotte. And William, who has mostly come across as whingey and very hard work for all around him, is growing on me with his new Alpha Dick ways. Thanks to whoever it is who periodically posts photos of Alpha Dick William, too - whoever you are, you have a real eye for Alpha Dickness. That sounds like it might be sarcasm but it isn't. You're spot on with those pics.

Don't believe for a second that Meggy Sharp has no nanny. Harry's been out and about (still think this is odd, would still like to see Will's schedule immediately post the birth of George to see if my impression is correct or not), there's no way she's looking after that baby alone. What kind of nutjob would turn down help with a newborn? Maybe she has gone full NOBODY TOUCHES THE BABY BUT MEEEEEEE control freak?

by Anonymousreply 485June 1, 2019 7:31 PM

It seems Fergie is semi-officially back in

by Anonymousreply 486June 1, 2019 7:32 PM

[quote] I'm tempted to open a thread on the subject, but according to this group of (dear, I hasten to add) friends, the descendants of the Earl of Oxford's family will have me stabbed in some shadowy byway in London. Of course, given the state of London right now, especially knife crime, no one will ever suspect who the real criminals are . . .

Indeed we will, blasphemer. Sidney? Bah humbug. Watch your back.

by Anonymousreply 487June 1, 2019 7:37 PM

Welp Troll alert at R478, talking about a poster having an hourly rate.

by Anonymousreply 488June 1, 2019 7:38 PM

R486. Nice to see Sarah back in the family. She's been very high profile the past year: best dressed at Harry's wedding, a big hit at Eugenie's wedding and even standing behind Philip in the official family photo, and the Yorks always presenting as a united family front wherever they go. Sarah has personality and pizzazz. I like her.

by Anonymousreply 489June 1, 2019 7:42 PM

All of the secondary royals benefit from the family as a whole drawing back in horror at Meghan's antics. Even Fergie looks reserved and dignified now.

The only one who suffers is the Queen, and her claim to Majesty.

And I'll bet her advisers don't even let her in on that fact.

by Anonymousreply 490June 1, 2019 7:49 PM

R491, you think they are horrified by Harry's wife buying clothes when Kate has been living off Wills since she was 21? Jesus, they are made of stronger stuff than that.

by Anonymousreply 491June 1, 2019 7:55 PM

Woe unto the house of Windsor?!

As if.

Cheesy invocations of doom against real power and money? Lol. Sounds like it was written by some tween who just did her assigned reading of Macbeth. With the improved economy the quality of those paid to post has probably declined.

Dim and MeMe wanting the throne would mean the deaths of all those adorable Cambridge tots we just saw frolicking about a garden. Very few, other than those paid to post, can get behind that narrative.

Do not give in to despair yet, R490, my money is on Lord Doom.

MeMe has been a boon to the Cambridges, the York, Camilla and even the Kartrashians, who she uses for sartorial inspo. The Queen is quite elderly, it is Charles who looks extremely weak. The Queen has brought those she trusts to deal with situations back. How they resolve the threat is worth watching. Pass the popcorn!

by Anonymousreply 492June 1, 2019 7:55 PM

YorkS, all off them

by Anonymousreply 493June 1, 2019 7:55 PM

Alright r492, I'll keep hope alive for Lord Doom

by Anonymousreply 494June 1, 2019 8:00 PM

For any newcomers who missed this KLASSY vid. Wonder if this is what made the boybander Max take a hard pass? Desperation is just not attractive. Unless you are Hairloss Harold, lol.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 495June 1, 2019 8:05 PM

R495-MM was trying so damn hard in that video, she ended up being the antithesis of sexy.

by Anonymousreply 496June 1, 2019 8:08 PM

Love this photo series of Kate being a mom and Prince George and Princess Charlotte being, well, little kids who need a mom

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 497June 1, 2019 8:09 PM

Trying even harder here, R496.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 498June 1, 2019 8:10 PM

Oh, God, R497. Cringed so hard (at the thumbnail!!) I nearly cracked a tooth. Brrrrr.

Everyone needs to watch the vid at R495. She's given us so. much. material. I wonder if anyone in the RF has ever seen that vid (post wedding) and just silently got up and left the room shaking their head.

by Anonymousreply 499June 1, 2019 8:13 PM

What MM was trying "so damn hard" at was making a living and supporting herself which is more then anyone in that family she married into does

by Anonymousreply 500June 1, 2019 8:16 PM

And it is NOT sexy is the funniest part.

Z list celebs were recoiling, except for Piers, who is an old fool, or who maybe wanted a repeat, who knows?

She is such a try hard. Now she wears ill fitting clothes and shoes in the wrong size. Girl is messy AF and always has been. She did well nabbing Trevor and the chef and should have stopped while she was ahead.

by Anonymousreply 501June 1, 2019 8:17 PM

Combine your viewings for maximum understanding of the grift: First watch r495, then watch r498 right after

by Anonymousreply 502June 1, 2019 8:18 PM

R500 - Oh god, you're embarrassing. Do stop making an ass of yourself. "MakeOut Meg" is a GRIFT who keeps on GRIFTING.

by Anonymousreply 503June 1, 2019 8:19 PM

How do you know, r500?

by Anonymousreply 504June 1, 2019 8:19 PM

What she was trying to do in that vid is find some other fool dick to climb on. We all choose among options in employment. Hard not to think of the rumors re: Harvey and Ratner. Ratner liked to prey/play with Russell, did she actually let a black dick near her?

by Anonymousreply 505June 1, 2019 8:20 PM

R502, remember the IG snaps? Substances may have played a role. Me-Gain looks blasted and no one, including the sketchy Doria, looks sober. The reframing of Saint Doria, the cultist is also quite amusing.

Too funny that there are so many stories floating around re: how they met. They think the shadiness is sexy or interesting rather than tawdry. According to The Sun, it was Markus, himself, but, who knows?

I find those that warned Harry away more interesting. There is the one persistent rumor of a friend with carnal knowledge. My guess is she blew Inskip at Soho London with Markus as the pimp. Other guesses?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 506June 1, 2019 8:27 PM

R505 sounds jealous of people who can get dick.

Why does the ethnicity of Meghan's sexual partners matter to you? That is creepy AF.

by Anonymousreply 507June 1, 2019 8:28 PM

Actually, how DID they meet?

by Anonymousreply 508June 1, 2019 8:29 PM

Words of wisdom, perhaps the Archbishop of Canterbury can share them with MeGain?

Isaiah 5:20 King James Version (KJV)

20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

by Anonymousreply 509June 1, 2019 8:30 PM

Melania is copying fashion icon Meghan's style, according to Jules B, Bethany Hamer

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 510June 1, 2019 8:31 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 511June 1, 2019 8:32 PM

The most plausible story is that they met at the IG in Toronto when the chef that she lived with for years was hired to cook for Harry, R508. She tagged along, she and Markus zeroed in on the mark, and the rest, is history.

Or perhaps Markus introduced them at Soho House in Toronto?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 512June 1, 2019 8:33 PM

At R510, should read "according to Online Fashion Editor of Jules B, Bethany Hamer"

by Anonymousreply 513June 1, 2019 8:34 PM

MeGain is wearing "chains" to emphasise her fake blackness, and Melania is wearing flowers, r510. Explain how they are similar.

by Anonymousreply 514June 1, 2019 8:34 PM

They keep trying to make her happen, R513, to little result.

by Anonymousreply 515June 1, 2019 8:35 PM

Thank you r512. Still confusing

by Anonymousreply 516June 1, 2019 8:37 PM

[post redacted because independent.co.uk thinks that links to their ridiculous rag are a bad thing. Somebody might want to tell them how the internet works. Or not. We don't really care. They do suck though. Our advice is that you should not click on the link and whatever you do, don't read their truly terrible articles.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 517June 1, 2019 8:38 PM

That is quite plausible, R516, particularly with the role Markus has played in her life.

by Anonymousreply 518June 1, 2019 8:39 PM

At R517, Meghan wore a Jules B. dress to the Queen's annual Christmas lunch in 2017 that reportedly sold out immediately.

by Anonymousreply 519June 1, 2019 8:39 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 520June 1, 2019 8:40 PM

Who cares, R519? She is a wanna be influencer who will be gone soon enough. She has played her hand quite badly.

by Anonymousreply 521June 1, 2019 8:41 PM

Such odd photos at IG. Where were the RPs?

Bit of a sharks circling vibe.

With the poor judgment, shabby treatment of lifelong friends and resentment of his family on full display, hard to feel sorry for Dim. He is a celeb wanna be just like his wife.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 522June 1, 2019 8:44 PM

Well I guess you don't, R519, but I thought it was interesting that Meghan wore a Jules B dress (that sold out in a flash!!!!) and now the Jules B fashion editor is saying Melania is copying her style.

by Anonymousreply 523June 1, 2019 8:45 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 524June 1, 2019 8:46 PM

The whole crew, Jess, Doria and Markus were there in Toronto at the IG events. Almost as if someone had planned it? Guess the chef was busy with cooking?

by Anonymousreply 525June 1, 2019 8:46 PM

Wow, R495, thanks for the video. That was embarrassing to watch. So much lip-biting and hair-tossing combined with her using the spatula to press down on the burgers while grilling (something that you're not supposed to do because it squeezes out the juices) all combine to give a distinct air of desperation to the entire thing.

It's odd to think that someone who majored in theater at Northwestern would end up ten years later in a soft-core porn video about grilling.

by Anonymousreply 526June 1, 2019 8:46 PM

R495. Regarding Markle and her outdoor ground beef grilling, this is how you eat a hamburger, love:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 527June 1, 2019 8:52 PM

I am sure she thought that Mens Health would be a come up, err, so to speak.

by Anonymousreply 528June 1, 2019 8:52 PM

For anyone who missed her attempt to channel Mother Theresa to write notes of encouragement to sex workers on bananas.

You are loved seemed particularly inappropriate.

She radiates sanctimony and smugness.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 529June 1, 2019 8:55 PM

Am sure she was thrilled when Men's Health asked her to do the video in r495. Look how she threw herself into it, so to speak.

by Anonymousreply 530June 1, 2019 8:57 PM

This has probably been posted before but couldn't resist as we're discussing MM's cringeworthy moments

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 531June 1, 2019 9:01 PM

And bananas, as the vid at r529 reminds us

by Anonymousreply 532June 1, 2019 9:02 PM

Yet still British footballers and Z list celebs shied away, R530. Not our Dim!

I sensed a bit of projection on her part, R532? As a rumored Harvey girl, perhaps some self justification?

by Anonymousreply 533June 1, 2019 9:03 PM

I can't wait to see how this ends.

by Anonymousreply 534June 1, 2019 9:05 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 535June 1, 2019 9:08 PM

Another Jules B. editor quote from a different Express article that shades Kate by implication:

[quote] Arguing Meghan’s bags express her “openness and affability”, Bethany Harmer, fashion editor at Jules B told Express.co.uk: “Often choosing larger bags over clutches while out in public shows that she doesn’t like to be restricted by bags without handles, preferring to keep her hands free to allow for more relaxed and meaningful interactions."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 536June 1, 2019 9:10 PM

Yet another Express/Jules B editor quote, spinning Meghan's penchant for wearing Dior:

[quote] Bethany explained that Dior is a designer heavily involved in royalty and Meghan has copied that as a simple nod to members of the Royal Family before her.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 537June 1, 2019 9:17 PM

Wonder why her focus on kindness? She seems to lack it. Who could forget this?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 538June 1, 2019 9:18 PM

Reeking of desperation in 2015. Pitching The Tig.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 539June 1, 2019 9:22 PM

How can she have gone on about the importance of tailoring in 2015 and go out looking like she does? Even with shoes that are the wrong size?

It is all SO FAKE. So little congruence between what she blathers on about and what she does. Grifter and fake.

by Anonymousreply 540June 1, 2019 9:27 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 541June 1, 2019 9:34 PM

The Cambridges are a picture of domestic bliss. They shop at Waitrose. George helps with the bags.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 542June 1, 2019 9:42 PM

Yoko can huff and puff, as can her surrogate speakers, yet The Firm will surely win in the end.

Lord Doom is on the job.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 543June 1, 2019 9:52 PM

I for.got. what an ass-licking hoe failed editor Joe Zee is, r539

Even next to ultra-ass-licker Wallis Markle he scans HOE HOE HOE

by Anonymousreply 544June 1, 2019 9:57 PM

Donnie can't help himself. What is Betty to do?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 545June 1, 2019 10:00 PM

Isn't the queen pro-brexit?

by Anonymousreply 546June 1, 2019 10:01 PM

Harry's going to cancel on the meals with Trump, right? He pretty much has to now, after Trump called his wife nasty. Actually, it would be a move of solidarity if William and Kate did the same. Maybe it could even pave the way for a partial reunion.

And it would piss Trump off that none of the younger more famous royals want to meet him. Just Charles who wants to talk to him about environmental issues (which Trump doesn't give af about) and a few others who want a free meal.

by Anonymousreply 547June 1, 2019 10:02 PM

R546, she is not allowed to say.

by Anonymousreply 548June 1, 2019 10:02 PM

Her prior crowd and ascension into the BRF sure reveals a LOT about Dim, no, R544?

by Anonymousreply 549June 1, 2019 10:02 PM

R547 - Will and Kate aren't on the guest list for any Trump event. They're with their children in Norfolk.

by Anonymousreply 550June 1, 2019 10:04 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 551June 1, 2019 10:06 PM

Betty's had worse state dinner guests than the Trumps says The Spectator.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 552June 1, 2019 10:11 PM

It is kinda qt seeing the usual elite class throw a right bitch fit over Trump when the Obama endeared himself to few with his 'vote the way i tell you or face repercussions'

by Anonymousreply 553June 1, 2019 10:16 PM

'The Queen has brought those she trusts to deal with situations back. How they resolve the threat is worth watching. Pass the popcorn!'

SKIPPIES ARE HERE!

by Anonymousreply 554June 1, 2019 10:19 PM

'As a rumored Harvey girl, perhaps some self justification?'

The misogynist Welp Troll has posted 342 times on this thread. MM hating is the new Larrie for them!

by Anonymousreply 555June 1, 2019 10:24 PM

Quite right, r553

by Anonymousreply 556June 1, 2019 10:25 PM

The Welp Troll has its own thread.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 557June 1, 2019 10:28 PM

Betting that no one on here even knows what r555 and r556 are talking about. But r555 is right.

by Anonymousreply 558June 1, 2019 10:29 PM

Sorry- r553 is right. No idea about r555. But r553 is damned right.

by Anonymousreply 559June 1, 2019 10:30 PM

R529 I called out that specific phrase ("you are loved") as shockingly inappropriate on the previous iteration of this thread and I'm glad someone else sees it, too. What the fuck was she thinking? I mean, she wasn't thinking and we know it. She wasn't thinking of those sex workers as actual humans with just as much inherent human value as herself, anyway. Meggy Sharp was thinking about just how good and wonderful and caring it was making her look. BARF.

R558 - You know what though? All politics aside? Nobody likes Donald Trump. And Obama hadn't spoken publicly about wanting to fuck the dead mother of HM's grandsons, so there's that.

Is HM for or against Brexit? I think against. That blue and yellow 'EU hat' in parliament sold me. As does the fact that HM was alive and conscious during WWII and, I suspect, understands the need for as many allies as one can acquire.

by Anonymousreply 560June 1, 2019 10:35 PM

What? Fuck you, r560. Don't drag me into your drama,

by Anonymousreply 561June 1, 2019 10:37 PM

MM was paid 50k per episode in the last few years of Suits and came to the marriage with a personal fortune of $5m, which is more than anyone can say for racist Kate. Her IG was a sideline which you racist fraus all mock whilst ignoring the fact that her weekly salary was more than your yearly salary.

by Anonymousreply 562June 1, 2019 10:39 PM

I'm discussing things R561. Because this is a discussion board. If you do not want to discuss things with me, there is the block option.

by Anonymousreply 563June 1, 2019 10:41 PM

But it made her look delusional, R560. No one thought better of her, quite the opposite.

The relentless drumbeat of media this weekend promoting Me-Gain as some sort of antidote speaking truth to Trump is laughable. She was a z list Deal or No Deal come up for play suitcase girl.

The strident pushing of her and trying to make her happen is simply not working.

Do we think she will exit the BRF in 2020, 2021 or 2022?

by Anonymousreply 564June 1, 2019 10:45 PM

Henry VIII's baby mama drama with Anne of Cleeves.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 565June 1, 2019 10:45 PM

Discuss away, just don't involve or tag me in any or your inane blabs.

by Anonymousreply 566June 1, 2019 10:47 PM

[quote] The Duke of York is being used as a secret weapon by Buckingham Palace in the belief he will be able to defuse any potential diplomatic disasters during the state visit of Donald Trump.

[quote] In what has been dubbed “golf course diplomacy”, British officials have taken the unusual step of ensuring Prince Andrew is alongside the American president for two out of the three days he will be in the country.

[quote] It is hoped the men’s shared passions for business, but more importantly their mutual love for the game of golf will help them bond allowing the prince to exert a subtle influence over the politician.

[quote] The pair met nearly 20 years ago when Prince Andrew visited Mr Trump and his then girlfriend, Melania.

LOL at the idea that anyone can have a subtle influence over Donnie.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 567June 1, 2019 10:51 PM

Ah, here we go... another stan repeating the completely made up narrative of how much MeGain was paid on her last season of Suits and her so-called net worth. All debunked, and soundly in the past, but maybe this frau thinks enough time has rolled along and some cretin who's been living under a rock might believe her?

by Anonymousreply 568June 1, 2019 10:53 PM

To have Howie Mandel, of all people, bother to throw shade:

Markle was "Slightly Duchessy" as Deal or No Deal Suitcase Girl

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 569June 1, 2019 10:57 PM

For those who missed our original introduction to Wallis 2.0.

I find her voice quite grating but watching with the sound off is pretty illuminating re: her and re: their dynamic.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 570June 1, 2019 11:02 PM

Who could forget her power play to close the deal with the Wild About Harry VF cover? Showing early on her penchant for completely disregarding norms of the BRF. All tousled hair and parted lips our Duch. Perhaps she was hoping to line up a Plan B with her sex-ay snaps, in case Harry came to his senses?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 571June 1, 2019 11:05 PM

He was good enough to use for his money and to burnish her image until she ghosted him. What a stone cold bitch.

“My parents had been so supportive,” she told V.F., “watching me audition, trying to make ends meet, taking all the odds-and-ends jobs to pay my bills. I was doing calligraphy, and I was a hostess at a restaurant—and all those things that actors do. My father knew how hard it is for an actor to get work, so he above all people was so proud that I was able to beat the odds.”

by Anonymousreply 572June 1, 2019 11:20 PM

8 out of 11 charities supported by sussexroyal are US based, at least one is entirely US focused. I guess Love is Love, just as long as it is American.

by Anonymousreply 573June 1, 2019 11:28 PM

All whilst living large off the British taxpayer, R573. Thought the Queen had nixed them building their own brand?

Virtue signaling hypocrite that she is, she gets away with what is allowed.

by Anonymousreply 574June 1, 2019 11:31 PM

8 out of 11 charities being US-based is a pretty brazen move.

by Anonymousreply 575June 1, 2019 11:55 PM

So the pic at R567 makes a lot of sense of Baytriss.

by Anonymousreply 576June 1, 2019 11:58 PM

Think May was pretty US based too, no? She is not hiding what she is about. Recent stories suggest she plans to take the spawn to NY this summer. PR is US focused. Not sure they will get her to Africa any more easily than they tried to get her into Frog Cot.

How soon do we think the new celeb friends will ghost her? When she leaves the RF? Within a year of leaving the UK?

It is really not looking likely that she will stick it out long enough to become a citizen, still 4 year to go. Of course, the departure date may not be up to her in the end.

by Anonymousreply 577June 1, 2019 11:59 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 578June 2, 2019 12:16 AM

Go ahead and explain to me why Harkle is marketing to us Yanks. And have been doing so for a while. Most of last month’s “Mental Health” resources were American, I think. Is the BRF setting up a branch in America? Also, Sara Lathem is busily building the “Meg as Martyr” narrative. Placing stories in the major papers talking allegingbtyat Meg is being systematically victimized by you nasty, racist Brits. In case you don’t know it, you’re paying dearly to have yourself trashed. Bunch of chumps.

by Anonymousreply 579June 2, 2019 12:38 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 580June 2, 2019 12:45 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 581June 2, 2019 12:49 AM

'Stop trying to make her happen'.

She already happened in 2017 on both sides of the Atlantic and she's just happening more and more!

I have no problem believing she's worth $5m from 7 years on the very popular Suits, plus endorsements. That's a standard amount. You get reality stars worth much more.

by Anonymousreply 582June 2, 2019 12:59 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 583June 2, 2019 1:06 AM

presidents always take up an entire floor

by Anonymousreply 584June 2, 2019 1:08 AM

R584 Do they have to take up an entire floor of the most expensive hotel?

And who is footing the bill for Donnie to play toy soldiers? My guess is that the British people are paying for the lion's share of this because they're the ones trying to sure up alliances.

by Anonymousreply 585June 2, 2019 1:12 AM

Listen, if there's any real dirt out there on our heroine, Trump's heard it. Like it or not, the guy has access to the choicest information in the world, on all of them.

by Anonymousreply 586June 2, 2019 1:15 AM

Brits will be paying for the security but not the hotel bills.

by Anonymousreply 587June 2, 2019 1:28 AM

Great comment re: our favorite duo of Wallis & Dim:

We get it, Meghan "ghoster" Markle and Harry "Heil Hitler" Windsor. You're the wokiest wokes who ever woked. Enough!

by Anonymousreply 588June 2, 2019 1:29 AM

The Times says Donnie is trying to build a political dynasty.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 589June 2, 2019 1:31 AM

I can never get over how Eric looks. It's shocking every time.

by Anonymousreply 590June 2, 2019 1:36 AM

That quote at R572 shits all over the "Thomas Markle is an evil NPD narc" narrative so beloved of her stans. People don't just up and reveal themselves as personality disordered in their 70s, after a lifetime of supporting and understanding (Meg's words!) their kid. By all accounts (90% from the horse's mouth) they had an ideal father daughter relationship up until mere days/weeks before the wedding. It stinks to high heaven. And not of a mistreated Cinderella-ish daughter being saved from her wicked dad.

So 8 out of 11 of this month's charities are American? You guys, what IS happening here?

It's genuinely outrageous that almost all their IG links this month are American. Not outrageous in a "bombing hospitals because we thought it was a bad guy lair" kind of way, just outrageous in a fun and gossipy but still real in that world of royals kind of way.

by Anonymousreply 591June 2, 2019 1:43 AM

Oh and to the poster who recoils from being addressed by stinky me, I must request that you sign your posts from now on so I can avoid it. I suggest "Angry Troll" or "Inane Ramblings Troll."

by Anonymousreply 592June 2, 2019 1:45 AM

All of Trump's children are chinless wonders. Ivanka was, too, pre-surgery.

They're scum, too. Just like daddy. Absolute scum. I know I'll get vehement disagreement on this and go ahead, I won't argue with you in this thread. I can't stand Meghan Markle. She's a 100% fake probable narcissist and I will laugh my head off if harry ever wakes the fuck up and realizes what a piece of work he married. But I swear I would perform careful and enthusiastic oral sex on her for hours before I would voluntarily spend any time with Trump or his foul family members.

by Anonymousreply 593June 2, 2019 1:51 AM

Meg’s NYC hotel room cost $75k. Per night.

by Anonymousreply 594June 2, 2019 1:53 AM

New thread here.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 595June 2, 2019 2:07 AM

Trial balloons?

Prince Harry Meghan Markle Baby By Gossip Cop Staff | 12:34 am, June 1, 2019

Prince Harry Meghan Markle Baby (National Enquirer)

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are going to raise their baby boy, Archie, in America, reports one of this week’s celebrity magazines. The claim, however, is completely untrue. While there’s a chance they will relocate for a certain amount of time outside the U.K., they are not moving to Hollywood or anywhere in the U.S.

According to the latest issue of the National Enquirer, “Royal rebel Megan is flat-out defying Queen Elizabeth’s order to move to Africa with Prince Harry and baby Archie.” Instead, they’re leaving Windsor Castle’s Frogmore Cottage, which was a gift from the queen, and heading to the United States, contends the supermarket tabloid. A so-called “source” is quoted as saying Markle has “gone totally rogue,” and is telling friends that “if the royal family want[s] her out of their hair, she’ll happily oblige by moving back to America.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 596June 2, 2019 2:23 AM

R593, Maybe you should start a Trump visiting BRF thread. Or Trump/Markle thread.

by Anonymousreply 597June 2, 2019 2:24 AM

Finishing

by Anonymousreply 598June 2, 2019 2:44 AM

this

by Anonymousreply 599June 2, 2019 2:44 AM

thread

by Anonymousreply 600June 2, 2019 2:45 AM

out.

by Anonymousreply 601June 2, 2019 2:45 AM

According to the National Enquirer Archie is also the long lost twin of the Bat-boy from outer space, don't you know?

by Anonymousreply 602June 2, 2019 2:55 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!