Meghan Markle Next Face Of Dior?

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

If Dior has a death wish, then it might be true. If Dior wants to stay in business, it would do well to steer clear. But I don't think it's true. Why would Dior entertain someone with bad taste and no idea of fitting her clothes.

It does at least explain why Megs has gone from fleshy to painfully thin.

It sounds like the perfect job for her: lots of attention and free clothes.

And perfect for everyone else: posed fashionistas rarely spout ill-informed, barely literate psychobabble about their own victimhood.

They still use Johnny Depp so maybe Dior likes scandal?

If they liked scandal they'd still have John Galliano, who besides being scandalous was certainly the most talented designer they've had since St Laurent.

The DM article makes it sound like her new management (which is basically Jeremy Piven from Entourage, right?) is taking her where she always wanted to be, where she expected marriage to Harry to land her.

Makes me think the divorce will be sooner rather than later.

I am so done with Meghan’s damn threads. I wish she would quietly and quickly disappear.

Why would Dior want that face? She's not attractive enough to be the face of anything. She also has a boxy figure that doesn't suit high-end fashion.

She's more like the face of my dog's asshole.

So much for privacy.

I think she's pretty and the public is interested in her so it might work. As said above, they stuck with Johnny and Sauvage is a HUGE HUGE moneymaker. Fashion often dabbles in questionable taste to get attention.

R12 the public WAS interested. It’s very unfortunate that her true colors are finally showing. I mean she was literally called a grifter by Spotify. You can only play nice for so long soon people will see who you really are…

Could you give more info on how and when and where Spotify LITERALLY called her a grifter? Thanks.

R14 remember you can Google too.

Here you go!

r14 do try to keep up dear. Here's a thread about it

Thank you. Wow. Well she is. But she still is pretty so whatever.

H and M manage to torpedo everything they touch so I expect more hilarity to follow. Dior deal or not.

If they did, Dior will go down in flames.

R17 oh yes, because if you’re pretty that solves everything. Right?

Meghan Markle worships her own anus.

I highly doubt Dior is going to do this but yeah, fashion houses will associate with sketchy famous people especially when they are trying to add some edginess to their brands. And she is pretty. And yeah she's a grifter. The two opinions can co-exist.

J Lo does ads for Coach and you wouldn't think that would be in her wheelhouse

Kind of the perfect job for her. She doesn’t have to speak and gets to be photographed wearing expensive clothes. What demographic they’re trying to appeal to with her is a mystery though.

Greedy crass gold diggers the world over. This is traditionally the Chanel and Vuitton market, of course.

Gen Z thinks Harry and Meghan are old so they are not going to appeal to a young demographic

Ciao Bella! Give a me a call, no? I want to… how you say… destroy Versace even more!

“Meghan is wise to distance herself from her husband's toxic dramas”

That DM article is *all* about Megs extricating herself from Harry. The Dior talk is just window dressing.

She is starting to throw Harry under the bus, they are going to market her as trying to stay away from H's negativity.

R26, Gen Z aren’t buying Dior. There are people beyond Gen Z.

I think she is better suited to rep less high fashion brands. Her casual style has always been great, especially before the marriage.

1. Don’t underestimate a corporation’s need to go “woke.” Hiring Markle might be their way of launching a campaign that emphasizes global citizenship and responsibility. Dior and Archwell partnership to Save The Planet.

2. Don’t forget that Markle likes to announce things in the hope of influencing certain things to happen. Does she have the same management as Dior?

3. Dior may want to tap the market of middle class black women. If the black women I worked with were any indication, black women were ecstatic when Markle married into the BRF. Dior may create a “budget” line for working class black women and have their products sold in Target, Kohl’s, TJ Maxx, etc.

Dior would have been wiser to hire Dylan as its next face. Meghan is so loathed by, well, everyone except Harry....until his imminent rude awakening.

Bitch stole my bag!

Dior has obviously tapped out of the Royals market, so they may as well go after the Bougie Black market.

How many times is she going to publish these fantasies?

- Meghan confirmed to present Best Picture Oscar

- Meghan booked for second Oprah interview

- Meghan set to launch Gayle King's talk show

- Meghan invited to coronation

Each and every story was pure fiction..

Don’t forget - Meghan’s mother invited to Sandringham Christmas

Of course a lot of these stories could just be tabloid shit-stirring on slow days.

I came from the people, they need to adore me

So Christian Dior me from my head to my toes

I need to be dazzling, I want to be Rainbow High

They must have excitement, and so must I

To be fair to her, R35, the women's magazines and their websites make up stories like that about various Royals every week. I'd like to think MeAgain was responsible for all of them, but she probably wasn't. That style of reporting started with Princess Diana, who sold such a phenomenal number of magazines that they always wanted her on the cover, and she didn't do enough (that they knew about) for a new story every week. So they just started making them up, and on it's gone from there. Now they make them up about everyone.

This is good, if true. Her husband will never be gainfully employed so she's going to need to find work. Hanging around the house with him everyday and listening to him whines and cries has to be miserable even for a bitch like her.

*listening to him as he whines and cries

Everyone knows that's exactly what Just Harry spends his days doing, too.

R37 The actress hasn’t learned the lines you’d like to hear…

I do think Meghan was the "victim" of a smear campaign in the first year of being a royal, but only because the Firm saw the writing on the wall and neutralized her before she could do much damage.

The most amazing thing about this thread is that there isn't a single person here that would not do the same thing if the opportunity introduced itself to them. I always wonder why people are always so jealous of the people they supposedly hate.

This is a pattern for her. She thinks of something she wants to happen and then it gets floated by her PR (who clearly can’t do anything to steer her, it’s her telling them what to do).

Her clothes often fit poorly and she is clearly unwilling to take direction. Dior would never hire her. They might pay her to post photos of her wearing Dior sunglasses. That’s the limit.

She is always aiming one or two levels too high. She could have been the face of a major brand (with the additional caveat that she would need to prove her willingness to work with their stylists and a good dressmaker) and an influencer and her own brand like Goop if she had gone that route right after leaving the BRF and been good-natured about the whole Megxit process. Instead she thought she was going to be a serious figure on the world stage. Which could have conceivably worked IFF her spouse was an actual intelligent, educated person with a record of leadership. She could have latched on to his reputation and built one of her own. She is far less intelligent that she thinks, but not a complete idiot. And now she is still aiming too high.

Fortunately for her, she doesn’t seem to have any serious substance abuse issues, so her bottom will probably be marriage to a dentist. Who she will take out her frustrations on.

She can always fall back on her residuals from Suits!

[quote] She is always aiming one or two levels too high.

She seems to have lowered her standards recently. Even if this puff piece were true, who on earth would care?

If she were intelligent she would’ve laid back and thought of Britain. One needs to put in a decade or so of “work” to be acceptable as a Royal. I don’t know how this new life of hers is any less stressful than cutting ribbons/bananas.

[quote] If she were intelligent she would’ve laid back and thought of Britain.

So true. I don’t understand why she bolted from that life. Everyone knew Queen Elizabeth was on her way out and that Charles was more pliable than his mother. If she had waited, she could have had a much better deal. All the status of a Royal and she could have dumped all the old people’s home visits on Harry or Edward & Sophie.

That tells me she has no patience and no ability to see what the future could hold.

I really know nothing about fashion…but these fools haven’t even been invited to the Met Ball, right? Isn’t that a pretty important endorsement of your place in high fashion? Why would Dior want to hitch itself to these losers?

But, again, I don’t know much about fashion so maybe her noteworthy would somehow work in their favor.

Dont forget according to Tom Bowers book she tried the thing with Reitmans in Canada but treated the staff HORRIBLY during photo/video shoots to the point of tears, demanded free expensive hotel suites, stole a pair of shoes from one of the commercials etc. I wonder if she would pull the same shit with Dior.

In another thread she is pegged as the new face of Ozempic, which is probably more lucrative than Dior..

I think Frogmore had a lot to do with her lack of a long game within the BRF. It just isn’t that nice. Sure, now the inside looks like an expensive hotel, but it’s not a great property.

The really foolish move was renovating it. I think once that money got spent, she realized she was stuck there and would be even after QE died. And they couldn’t say anything about it and still can’t because (1) it’s a nicer home than 99%+ of the world has and (2) they spent a fortune on it.

Frogmore cottage is a booby prize, as evidenced by Charles trying to push Andrew into it and Andrew’s heel digging. The comparison to William and Kate’s homes was probably a chronic source of resentment and they let it fester and color their perspective on everything.

R5 boo hoo. Yes it’s a dump by comparison but she could’ve moved on up had she played the game. As you said, it’s a LONG game with the BRF.

R52 not r5

[quote]She's more like the face of my dog's asshole.

Pics please.

I think she could have had spectacular digs in the London palaces, if she had played the game correctly. And Frogmore could easily have been expanded with some grand rooms, an office, and a beautiful garden, if she had waited a bit.

It's typical set up to fail trolling. When Meghan doesn't become the face of Dior there will be hundreds of made up articles spouting her made up devastation. It's interesting that Meghan is being targeted this week.

And Frogmore Cottage is straight down the lane in Windsor Estate from Windsor Castle. It's an abundance of facilities and luxuries at their fingertips. If those two had become central working royals, she could have been entertaining in Royal style.

Who will live at the Frog Cottage?

She's such a shit actress that her voice was dubbed over when she did that commercial for Tostitos. Disney probably has a small bit of regret for passing over Meryl Streep as the narrator of the Elephants documentary.

[quote]...passing over Meryl Streep as the narrator of the Elephants documentary

Was Streep the person who had already done the narration which was replaced by Mrs. Harry? Or was it someone else?

I seem to remember that the narration had already been done before the Sussex pair were involved.

Dior rhymes with whore. Which is what La Duchesse probably is.

The Markles (or at least she) will have to do something else to remain in the public eye and have cash flow because this Archewell bullshit (foundation, audio, production, etc.) is not working. No one likes them, and they have no talent or creativity to carry it off and see it through..

Frogmore Cottage was given to them because they were already starting to be pains in the ass. Had they played nicely at Kensington Palace and got along with Wills and Kate, they could now ask Charles to give them something else.

We know of Harry’s resentment of not getting the big sausage like Will, but if Meghan had smoothed it over and ingratiated herself to Charles, she’d be better off right now. Camilla knows how to handle manchild Charles and if I were Meghan, I would have gone straight to Camilla and asked, “What’s the best way to handle the Windsor men?” I would have glued myself to Camilla, lit her cigarette, poured her gin and made her my closest ally. After all, Camilla has her own house and partially exists outside of the BRF.

Meghan could have been the patron of The National Theatre. Think of it, every opening night, she gets attention by association. Everytime you see Anne or Edward and Sophie dressed to the nines and strolling around at an event, it could have been Meghan. Balcony appearances, flower shows, Ascot. She gave it all up for what?

She’s just manifesting.

I think she *was* patron of the National Theatre.

Has the Duchess ever appeared in the legitimate theater?

Frogmore Cottage was actually superior to most of the other properties available because it was the only one that could be completely gutted and rebuilt to their specific tastes. In all the other properties they would have been able to fix the heat, plumbing and electric, but after that the Grade 1 renovation rules kick in, meaning you can barely redecorate (except in terms of furniture) only repair and refresh in the same style and using the same materials as the original build used.

No, the reason the extremely comfortable and pretty Frogmore cottage was unacceptable is because it was owned by the Queen and not Harry. Meghan realised it could never be on the table in a divorce, and that even if they moved elsewhere within the Estates, nowhere they ever lived while in the BRF would be on the table in the event of a divorce.

R8 thinks Meghan starts threads about herself on Datalounge.

These two fuckwits probably thought they'd get Frogmore HOUSE. (Which is a pretty nice venue place.)

R64 I think it was Tina Brown said that even Diana held onto Kensington Palace for dear life in the divorce. These fools were set to get the apartment next to W/K—I think second biggest at the palace. Renovation plans were set. And they threw it away because of petty bullshit. What a pair of dimwits.

Jealous, hateful MAGATS are crying about Dior giving Meghan a contract going all oh, i WiLl sToP buying FrOm DiOr .....NEWSFLASH ,bitch you can't afford DIOR!!!

r71 Diana had to really fight to keep the KP apartment, and even then it was only done so that the children would not be uprooted.

Had she not been the mother to the future King, she would have been turfed out just like Fergie was.

I know nothing about Dior nor do I care to learn, but isn't Markle about old to be a model?

It's a bit suspicious that after the cancellation of her podcast we're now being inundated with stories about Meghan perhaps being the next face of Dior or becoming a major influencer. There does seem to be a significant trying to change the narrative tactic at play right now.

Does MM even make an appearance at Fashion Week?

Her dresses are always a miss, and her hair is often a mess. The next face of DIOR? Oh, please. Probably, the face after a 2-hour sleep with a hangover.

^^^^As I said jealous hateful MAGATS

She has never been invited to Dior's show or their Fashion week events, she has never been invited to the Met Ball, she always looks "off" in Dior clothes, but she will be Dior's pick for 2024?

I sincerely doubt this story.

If she’s going to lie, why did she choose Dior?

Wasn't Dior the house that dressed her up as Wallace Simpson for the Jubilee? I always thought that their white coatdress design choice for her, nearly identical to one Wallace wore, was a subtle jab.

The Fucking Grifting Face of DIOR!!!

And she chose DIOR because she thought she looked spectacular in this gold DIOR dress, when, in fact, she did not.

R7, I thought that after she recently signed with the newer version of the William Morris agency for creative development. They made a point it was not for acting and it was not them, only her. Producing is where the money is and she'll have a lot of doors open with this representation. This may be how she got the Dior deal. In any event, she married Harry for the money and power. She has two children who are prince and princess whether she is married to Harry or not. With her own money, she really doesn't need him. It may take awhile for her to start producing but the minute the funds start rolling in, he's history.

Regarding the outfits referenced at r80, here they are

Whatever will she produce? Netflix shelved Pearl for a reason, and 12 dismal episodes of Archetypes was all Spotify could squeeze out of her. Production doors have closed on her, why would anyone start opening them now?

Is the collar of the dress she is wearing in the link at R83 supposed to gape like that? I think it looks bad, but the gaps at so big, it seems to go beyond bad tailoring and be on purpose.

Something seems very off with Harry. Does anyone know if he suffers from a learning disability? He just appears to be lacking in emotional intelligence and seems very slow and off. Does he have a low IQ? I’m just curious and not trying to be mean. He just really seems to have to be led through his life like he lacks intelligence or something. I honestly cannot even articulate my feelings. Maybe 🤔 I’m the one lacking. Lmao.

^^^^yeah...he never really gets it does he ?

r85 her tailoring is always, always, always off.

Aside from Tyler Perry or possibly Oprah, who else would hand her the reins (and money) to produce anything?

Any corporation that throws money at either of them do so at their own peril . Their reputations for staff mistreatment , high staff turnovers, , overall disloyalty, dishonesty, and laziness have been solidified and should raise enough red flags.

Has it been established why Tyler Perry is so passionate about helping Meghan? The rent-free home, the years of praise, etc.

What's he getting out of this relationship? It seems completely one-sided.

Wasn't Tyler originally asked to help them by his mentor Oprah, r91? That might explain part of it. As it is now, he's godfather to one of the kids, so now he's stuck with the Harkles.

Jealous, MAGAT trash

Incoming: Netflix deal with H&M unlikely to continue.

The upcoming Sister Act project will be a reboot with Megs in the Whoopi role.

r94 Holy MARY. Netflix too? I guess the Netflix numbers could not have been that great after all....

[quote]The upcoming Sister Act project will be a reboot with Megs in the Whoopi role.

As Sister Activist: Am I Okay?

Given their lack of success at Spotify and Netflix, is it possible that the sales figures for Spare were artificially inflated too? It’s really weird how quickly all the fuss around it died down, after a week or two. It should have been a seismic event, but it really seems like nothing at all.

r97 Perfection.

r98 Darling Of COURSE they were. Are you fresh off the bus?

You don't have to read very far between the lines of the DM story to see that this is a plant from her "friends" who want to show potential sponsors she's in demand and worth a fortune.

In any event, that ill-fitting suit Harry wore to the Coronation hardly put Dior in a good light.

Meg at R93, it's long past time to stop this insanity.

We see you, and the "Prince Louis' antics' thread you started.

Maybe instead of her face she should have lead with her ass?

Any brand hiring her at this point is positively suicidal.

Her stench will remain about them for decades.

A good way to separate Wheat from Chaff.

Leading with her ass? I certainly hope not!!!

^Wow. A Markle through and through.

r105 I think you mean backfat, dear.

She has since injected Ozempic and looks SO MUCH... well, slightly better. Her face looks like a frog now, but we will all studiously ignore that fact.

Natalie Portman would be a better choice.

Thst dress is beautiful, and so is Natalie.

R107 I couldn't find the photo with her fat ass bloating in the jeans, so this one with the backfat will do.

Well this so called "reported" deal is certainly being talked about. We shall have to see what happens if anything....

OTOH getting a female member of BRF on board would be a coup for Dior. While royal ladies do often wear things from European fashion designers, most if not majority of what's on their backs comes from British fashion houses. This is natural since one job of BRF from monarch on down is to promote British industry.

Even Diana when POW wore mainly British designers, at least for events or things she'd be photographed.

Of course no British princess (even by marriage) would under normal circumstances be allowed to become "face" of anything, much less a French fashion house. But since Meg is beyond the pale already guess it doesn't matter.

She shouldn't be the next face of Dior, she should be the next face of Poor.

I’m indifferent to the Markles but Natalie Portman looked like a prune in her recent Cannes pics.

I welcome the collapse of the House of Dior.

Dior's new line "Self-inflicted" will be modelled by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and will express everything about them and about this TIRED LINE....

Looks like Dior skimped on fabric yardage in skirt for copy of "Junon" gown they made for Ms. Portman

Harry had better fasten his seatbelt. He's in for a bumpy ride and, if the article at R1 is anything to go by, it'll be getting started soon.

I loved Dior including John Galliano. LOVED. Last Christmas they took over most of Harrod's exterior with DIORDIORDIORDIOR in tacky lights. and now arelinked to the tackiest of all Sussexes.Surely there must be better ways to keep it going.

Harry has nothing to worry about except for her divorce lawyers, r116,

Well, her lawyers and their private detectives...

Will they still get all of the 81 millions from Netflix? That is a substantial fortune. Perhaps they shouldn't piss away their money now. Thats enough money for most people to be secure and modestly rich, if well invested, for life.

[quote] Harry has nothing to worry about except for her divorce lawyers

That's what friends told Phil Hartman as well, "How much harm can she do, Phil?"

I don't think Kate is particularly attractive, but she looked stunning at the funny dress-up thing today. Beautiful hat, beautiful white polka dot dress, beautiful shoes.

Sources within Dior says there have been do talks with Meghan's people about her becoming a Dior model.

No Dior Deal?

And no life threatening harrowing car chase with paps in NYC?

R122 I was just going to post something similar. Sources at Dior told The Telegraph they are surprised by the rumours Meghan might become a spokesperson, they have never reached out to her, and wonder where this story is coming from.....gee I wonder!

It was Doritos, not Dior! Sorry for the confusion. Look for the Duchess' new ad campaign for "4D Crispy Sun Baked Montecito Doritos!!" coming to this space soon. We're in the process of negotiating an exclusive branding agreement with Muriel!

r124 As I said I think this will turn out to be as fictional as the Oscar invites that never happened. Why do they seem incapable of learning that this manifesting via the media is making them look incredibly foolish??

They both have become glenn close in dangerous liasions.

R93 KGT, bitch shut the fuck up. I voted for Hillary in 2016 and Joe Biden in 2020. I have a large framed copy of the photo of Kathy Griffin holding Trump's severed head on my living room wall.

Someone needs to phone your care home and have your internet privileges revoked. You are so deluded if you think every single person who hates Meghan Markle is white and Republican.

Someone has egg on their face… Meghan.

Does this look like a white woman to you, KGT?

I disagree, R118. Harry is not an angel but I wouldn't be surprised if Meghan made all sorts of accusations once he's no longer useful to her. The lawyers you mention will threaten Harry's financial future but Meghan may try to make him into a pariah.

[quote]Why do they seem incapable of learning that this manifesting via the media is making them look incredibly foolish??

Er, because they ARE incredibly foolish?

It ain't happening! Everyone can stand down.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

@R66 et al

Yes, MM *was* royal patron to the National Theatre. She has been turfed out, replaced by Queen Camilla.

"Her husband will never be gainfully employed so she's going to need to find work. "

I'm sorry?

PH may not get the full $20 million from Spotify deal, but he received bank from his book deal. How much more gainfully employed can one get?

Of course Duke of Sussex already had a fortune before marrying the Markle woman. Much of it was Diana's money and while not huge PH wasn't in any danger of being poor.

😲 Are those supposed to be post-blow job pictures at r134? I haven't opened the article, but in the preview I honestly thought the picture was of a Markle impersonator. So sloppy!

Are we sure that isn't Kitara Ravache at R134?

What a grift this all is by the tabloids.

The Mail on Sunday made up the Dior rumor, then other tabloids (some of which are owned by the same company), "royal experts" and online paid trolls announced the made-up shit was never true. Well no shit it's not true, it was completely fabricated.

It's happened before and it will continue to happen because it's free and easy, and there's always a gullible audience.

Obviously they need to get those kids working and making money pronto! Biracial young children are still quite trendy, there may not be Benetton ads anymore, but they are bound to find work on the Bridgetton series and should be a shoo in as Queen Charlotte’s children.

Biracial? Her spawn is about as whitebread as possible.

R141 But that’s what’s perfect, biracial on a technicality, but reading as white!

But due to them looking lily-white she won't be able to merch them when it comes to promoting racial justice etc. In order to be 'merchable' that particular way they'd need to look at least a little bit biracial, alas ...

I’m sure she knows enough people In Hollywood to get those lips and noses pumped up with filler and collagen.

With her terribly Ozempic-aged face these days she'll need those fillers and collagen stuff all for herself though.

[quote] But due to them looking lily-white she won't be able to merch them when it comes to promoting racial justice etc.

That’s why Light Egyptian was created.

I don’t think she plans to use them in any justice capacity. It’s hard to do that with Prince and Princess titles. She really can’t even say the BRF is racist now that they have those titles.

At least it's not Dylan Mulvaney.

Who is this guy everyone is chattering on about?

[quote] It’s hard to do that with Prince and Princess titles. She really can’t even say the BRF is racist now that they have those titles.

Trust Meghan to come up with a new spin by eventually complaining about her kids getting these titles. "I always wanted them to grow up normal BUT HARRY'S FAMIlY FORCED THOSE TERRIBLE TITLES UPON THEIR POOR INNOCENT SOULS!!!"

I wonder if Tyler Perry has buyers remorse.

Would Meghan beard for Miss Perry? He certainly has industry power to get her work, plus he's rich AF.

Tyler needs to have Megan star in a sequel called I Can Do Cunt All By Myself!

Isn’t Tyler the Godfather to H&M’s children?

Why don’t they become the model family for H&M clothing stores advertising?

After the divorce, MM will be free to merch the kids. This is the only thing about which Harry is firm.

r155 But not merching them post divorce could be one of the things his divorce lawyer negotiates for him in the divorce settlement?

Rumor has she once went on lithium years ago and it helped her quite a bit but she stopped taking it once she started to gain weight.

Guess what designer Queen Camilla chose to wear to Ascot today?

Her Majesty really is delightfully cunty. She should be a D/L fave.

Ascot? That Camilla move was more like AssCunt!

Love ya Cams!

What happened to the When will Harry and Meghan divorce thread?