Official Coronation Thread Part III - God Save King Charles!

WORSE THAN HITLER!

Cosplay nite at old folks home.

and the crowd goes wild.. yet again

Excellent horses, great music, furs and jewels.

What is that fur, the King wore in his carriage? White with black spots? Ermine?

His scepter was covered with diamonds

Yes r4, that fur would be ermine, The ermine is a variety of weasel, and is also called a stoat. (But ermine sounds so much better.)

The Princess Royal can cockblock . She has the bigger todger.

So those were REAL diamonds?!!! Wow! The King must be a very rich man.

Scots show their love for Charles

Why does he always look like he's going to lunge at some ones throat?

William has dark energy. Harry is all light and positivity

Sums it up.

An exhausting ceremony, most ceremonies are. No wonder people are quitting the monarchy.

I kind of love Camilla’s ladies-in-waiting's style.

(Is that correct grammar?)

R13 But didn't they look a bit like nurses?

Klan Grannies go home.

Charles will probably last another decade and then it will be William the Bald's turn. He always looks miserable and as if he'd bite your head off at a moment's notice.

Has anyone mentioned the Middletons yet? Where were they sitting, with the public?

If you must wear yellow, and you shouldn't, Pippa's dress was the right yellow=pale lemon. Any other yellow and the color is wearing you.

Carole Middleton put too much eyeliner on, her headband is to large, but she has amazing hands for a 68 year old.

[quote]I kind of love Camilla’s ladies-in-waiting's style.

I kind of love the style of Camilla’s ladies-in-waiting.

*too* large

R13 You're old dear.

r6 Why are the fans angry?! Anne could be protecting Harry by doing that from all the cameras he claims traumatise him! On another point I have read speculation and comments elsewhere online that Harry's eyes were very dilated today as if he was high or under the influence of drugs or taken drugs the night before??

One can always count on NoPalmOil at R13 to praise some questionable setup.

I used to like her posts, but now, more and more, I see she is just a basic bitch from the South with a taste for the tacky, who is a housewife to a man.

Disgraceful.

R21 Think he's on the same stuff you're on doll... only less.

r23 Covonia cough medicine and ibuprofen --"doll"?

R14

If nurses wear long, sparkling white gowns, I guess?

[quote] If nurses wear long, sparkling white gowns, I guess?

Bless your heart, you're stupid.

chatter on. Damn Harold really has no use for his family. Already on a plane back to the B**** of Montecito as quickly as possible.

Now maybe he'll just be ignored. Sad for me, before MM entered his life, he was a fun guy who seemed to do interesting things and could easily speak with Brits.

My computer kept crapping out, and it ruined the whole thing,

I watched on Roku.

R539 Yes, Harry’s kids are very young, but the point is it’s a historical event involving their immediate family so it would be nice for them to know in some way that they were included in some way.

FLOTUS attended and was surprisingly well dressed

R30 more than likely those kids won't give a rat's ass. They'll grow up American where royalty is just not thought of much.

R32, sure thing. That's why we invite our own like the Kardashians and others of their ilk.

The Kardashians are not royal though like them they are also trash.

r30 Princess Anne was not traumatised by being too young to attend her mothers coronation

[quote]On another point I have read speculation and comments elsewhere online that Harry's eyes were very dilated today as if he was high or under the influence of drugs or taken drugs the night before??

Sounds like something you would have read on one of DL's Klan Granny threads.

r36 No it wasn't here . One of the places was Lipstick.

Why reference anonymous comments from a website that is even more obscure than datalounge?

r38 Obscure? Hardly it's a place mentioned on here a lot. Besides it's all part of the gossip, speculation, butchery and debate mix on here throughout the forum. Do you think he looked high on drugs?

r39 LOL I meant bitchery!!

[quote] butchery

I laughed.

It's mentioned by those with an obsession, no one else

I thought he looked bald and he was right to attend and leave the missus home.

r42 Do you think he looked high or had telltale signs of drug use especially in his eyes?

The two ladies in waiting looked like stand-ins for Camilla. Similar age, similar hair, similar dress. If you had to do a police line-up of suspects resembling Camilla, you could use those two ladies.

Did William and Charles even get to see Harry?

No. I didn't

R11, I guess you too have the brain of a 6 year old or however old Louis is.

Now that this is over, let's hope the two turds of Montecito finally flush.

r45 I think they were her sisters

r41 I don't blame you! A very apt typo in some senses!!

I do love butchery, sometimes.

Why do the English sovereigns wear that ugly Cruella DeVil fur trim!? Around the crown too. So ugly, gaudy,tacky gauche.

Any gay action at the after party?

r53 Charles Armstrong Jones?

R49, quit bringing them up every chance you can. Fucking klannies...smh.

R52, I think it's quite an ugly crown too.

I wish Charles and Camilla well and hope that his reign is one for history books as a sovereign who leaves a legacy of improving the lives of his people. But after watching this morning's ceremony, I wonder, "will William have the same ceremony?" It seemed so anacronistic of a previous age.

Harry couldn't wait to bail on Cosplay at the Senior Center. Good to be back in the 21st Century Land of The Living.

Can we wait at least a week before mapping out the next corrie?

When Anne got up to take a tinkle and a whisky.

Always some one pissing in the punch bowl.

Willy too distracted by Rosie couldn't read his cue card and botched his oath to Pa .Just two lines. This lot is very "limited"

Apparently Willy has a "type".

Can you imagine what Kate will look like in 20 years when she's finally is crowned?

Yeh .

Amazed old baggage remained upright.

The only thing left for Charles to do is die.

Camilla is a sea witch. I have nothing against Charles other than his general fuckheadedness. The crown was all right.

[quote]Can we wait at least a week before mapping out the next corrie?

Okay, as long as we can start planning the next funeral right away.

[quote]Can we wait at least a week before mapping out the next corrie?

People were calling it "corrie bobs" on Twitter.

Harold looks so very miserable, filled with remorse and regret for the magnificent life he abandoned for that wog woman!

^ Looks like a dude who dodged a bullet.

One of them was at the Coronation, dumbass @ R49.

Peg & Peggy were late and Pa was royally cheesed off.

^ Willy had to chase down his missing regalia.

Interesting choice to have rescue dogs embroidered on the queen's dress.

Well it's done now, eh?

Nast ole git in ridiculous drag bitches at pages. 😂

R76 Bitches . Very appropriate.

Drat ! The party did not go as the party planner planned?

R11 A kid yawns. You got a real scoop there! Wonder if you'll get a Pulitzer.

They all look so bloody miserable. With one exception. LOL

Harry looked miserable at times as well.

Harry looked dignified.

Mike Tindell should have slapped the balding Harry upside the head from behind - repeatedly.

r83 As dignified as someone who shares publicly a story about putting his mothers favourite cream on his private parts saying it reminded him of her...!

We I guess he's right. His family is trapped in it.

But it's not that bad of a place to be trapped in.

In a century I am sure all of this pomp and pageantry will be absurd.

Bowing down to some family and pretending they're higher than you. Ridiculous.

It's like a form of worshipping God in the flesh.

R88, it is NOT like that. It is that. Rather God's agent on earth. Worshiping a form of god in the flesh. That is what it is.

Here:

If I'm not mistaken Henry VIII of England and Louis XIV of France considered themselves divine.

R82 that looks like a rogues gallery.

Harry has resting bitch face. Married people grow to look alike over time. Also, he is constantly angry. So there's that too.

Granny Google: Resting Bitch Face..

Daddy's home and we lived happily ever after!💕

R22

And one can always count on you to use an innocuous thread to be condescendingly rude and unfunny.

R83 You must be joking. Harry had that court jester grin plastered on his face. It was clearly awkward.

Here's a nice fashion compilation from W magazine, royals from other nations & some celebrities. All the men seem to have dyed hair. Jill Biden & granddaughter looked good.

Good old Princess Anne, she wore menswear to a super-formal event again!

I guess now that her mother is gone, she's dropped any pretense of femininity.

r99 I think she is very feminine in her own way

R9 because he is an angry man, full of violent rage

For the Brits, is Penny Mordaunt a lesbian? I'm getting lezzie vibes. Butch , cane face

r102 I think she used to have a male partner? Her brother is gay.

In terms of the celebrities at the Coronation I'm surprised Joan Collins and Shirley Bassey weren't invited- I thought they were favourites of Charles?

I'm not a Brit so Charles ain't my king.

And, boy, did he look unhappy throughout the Coronation. What's the matter with him? He waited 73 years to be crowned king and yet he looked like he'd been taken hostage.

He claims he wants to modernize the monarchy and Saturday was the time to do it. But no. It was the same crap-a-palooza we've come to expect from the royal family

And at a cost of 100 million pounds.

Why was Charlotte dressed like the pope?

Harry had false bravado, he was smiling and greeting people who were ignoring him and that had to be embarrassing. He learned from his wife the actress to plaster a smile on his face. But you can see when the guard drops. He will be ranting to his wife and they will be scheming up more things.

[quote]He will be ranting to his wife and they will be scheming up more things.

And you'll be having more psychotic episodes.

I don't think Charles looked miserable. What was he supposed to do during the ceremony? Do Three Stooges impressions with every response and sit there with a silly ass grin on his face?

R96, you are a motherfucker.

How many of your brain cells died as you were you trying to come up with that response?

Holy shit.

That style of crown is so effeminate on a man.

A crown like this would look more manly.

R103, If Joan Rivers were alive, she’d have been invited.

[quote]Princess Anne was not traumatised by being too young to attend her mothers coronation

To be fair, Princess Anne was not traumatised by being the victim of a kidnap attempt in which her chauffeur and bodyguard were shot beside the car and the baddie spent a full 15 minutes trying to drag her out of the vehicle. This was before mobile phones and a taxi ended up calling it in. She told the kidnapper calmly she wasn't going anywhere.

I don't think "Princess Anne" and "emotional trauma" belong in the same worlds.

[quote]Harry had false bravado, he was smiling and greeting people who were ignoring him

Not true. There were pics of him beaming and getting his hair affectionately ruffled. You cunts are insane.

What is so important about a kid’s fourth birthday party?

I hope he turns out like Edward VII, who waited so long to ascend the throne and people thought he'd be a disappointment but his short reign (9 years) is actually regarded as surprisingly successful. His mother Victoria was a very lazy and vain monarch.

For some parents it's important R114.

R116, As if the kid is going to remember.

The kid won't but the parents will. Does it matter? The kid wouldn't remember a coronation either. What does it matter to you?

A four year old is more likely to remember a unique experience of a coronation with 1000s of people and an airshow than ice-cream and jelly. Archie should have been there

[quote] A four year old is more likely to remember a unique experience of a coronation with 1000s of people and an airshow than ice-cream and jelly. Archie should have been there

Markle should have been there, on behalf of her children.

I believe it's possible that Markle will one day 2nd guess, if not regret, her decision to not attend the Coronation; that she didn't just for a couple of hours, endure being there, if for no other reason than for her children.

I'm not a Frau, far from it. My observation isn't based upon a Karen's lament of "What about the children!?"

It's based upon posterity.

When Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet become older, curious children, they're going to wonder about all of this, ask questions, seek context. Yes, they'll see images of their father at the Coronation, but not Mom.

And, oh, by the way, who insisted on those Prince and Princess titles for their children?

I suppose, however, it asks too much of Markle to do that on behalf of her children. She didn't even want to preserve her own connection to the BRF, unless it's to milk it for money and celebrity.

What was big Meghan's reason for not going? I thought she liked Papa Charles

I could not agree more with R120.

r111 Oh for sure health permitting as she'd be 90 now I think if she was still with us?

There was a few interesting names invited such as Judi Dench , antique rv restoration presenter Jay Blades and Ex EastEnders actress Rose Ayling Ellis.

R113 Harry was mugging like a talk show host laughing and greeting people and most in return were studying their shoes or looking sideways to avoid eye contact with him. He learned the smiling and acting like he is talking to somebody act from his wife. In pictures you may be able to pull it off but on video when the people aren’t responding back it doesn’t work.

The husbands of Eugene and Bea got stuck talking with him.

I can't see R120 so it's a klan granny and therefore irrelevant.

R125 - I have no idea what a "klan granny" is, so don't know why it is automatically irrelevant. If DL allows, here's what was written: Markle should have been there, on behalf of her children.

I believe it's possible that Markle will one day 2nd guess, if not regret, her decision to not attend the Coronation; that she didn't just for a couple of hours, endure being there, if for no other reason than for her children.

I'm not a Frau, far from it. My observation isn't based upon a Karen's lament of "What about the children!?"

It's based upon posterity.

When Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet become older, curious children, they're going to wonder about all of this, ask questions, seek context. Yes, they'll see images of their father at the Coronation, but not Mom.

And, oh, by the way, who insisted on those Prince and Princess titles for their children?

I suppose, however, it asks too much of Markle to do that on behalf of her children. She didn't even want to preserve her own connection to the BRF, unless it's to milk it for money and celebrity.

Harry didn’t read the room, he thought he could go back to acting like good old joking Harry but everyone has now seen his real ugly side.

That's a klan granny r126.

I suspect R126 is a klan granny too.

Charles attended his mother’s Coronation when he was the same age Archie is now.

Total non sequitur R130.

R131, If Charles could attend at 4, then so could Archie.

Non sequitur R132. It's a moot point and none of your business. The kid would be bored and would not remember but, again, myob.

R133, Then, he also would not remember if his father was there for his fourth birthday party, you ignorant cunt.

[quote] I suppose, however, it asks too much of Markle to do that on behalf of her children. She didn't even want to preserve her own connection to the BRF, unless it's to milk it for money and celebrity.

She was smart not to go. Her presence would have been a distraction that the tabloids would have seized upon. Every twitch of her face would have been scrutinized and given an inordinate amount of press attention. She's done with the royal sh*tshow and good for her.

R133 are you suggesting that my child is backward? You louse!

Klan grannies..pissed she didn't go but furious of she had. Ignorant cunts.

I appreciate your gesture , r126, but it’s to no avail. .

Stan Grannies for Markle can’t, are unable to, or won’t out of sheer desire to troll, comprehend any nuanced, deeper observations about her.

I’ve posted empathetic things about Markle, acknowledged that I’ve no doubt she was the target of bigotry, but unless you discuss her as being the equivalent of Mother Theresa with a title, mansion and activist cred, you’re a Klan Granny.

They’re just like her haters. You’ve got to see Markle as spotted in the Wuhan Lab wearing a white lab coat unleashing Covid and she’s the bad seed spawn of someone spotted on the grassy knoll.

R103 she never was very feminine. Tilda Swinton vibes.

Too bad she couldn't be Queen

The old bats who cream their fannies about that old harridan Anne are the same weirdos who obsess on Mamie Eisenhour and Condi Rice. Repulsive viragos all.

R141 fuck off cunt

It really is too bad that Meg didn't go, to bad for us anyway, I'm sure Charles was hugely relieved.

Because it would have been SO easy for her to steal the show, without being obvious about it. Just swan in wearing a red Full Alexis outfit with a huge hat that blocks the view of the people behind her, walk with her head held high and a swing in the hips, bestowing smug knowing smiles at all the stuck-up aristocrats! Think of the headlines, the social media pics!

Or better yet, dress as the picture of demure elegance, and just... look hurt every time she was snubbed! Seriously, if she'd gone and just taken the trouble to look hurt every time someone snubbed her, or to look sadly at Harry each time, or to wipe away that trademark single tear in view of a camera, nobody would be talking about anything else these days! There'd be no end of discussion about racism and snobbery in royal circles, which is exactly the kind of talk her brand needs. She was a fool to stay home.

r139 I think she's fab and was flawless yesterday. Laser focused as always on the role at hand without pretension. She was very popular with men back in the 1970s.

[quote] She was a fool to stay home.

Agreed, for the most part, and I'm entertained by your post.

I too, suggested she, both on behalf of her children (seriously) and her own celebrity viability appear, head high, with an air of Your-Favorite-Villainess-Has-Arrived.

Or, mostly, how about accompany your husband, dressed in expensive inconspicuousness, take your seats, see and be seen, then leave?

[quote] She was smart not to go. Her presence would have been a distraction that the tabloids would have seized upon. Every twitch of her face would have been scrutinized and given an inordinate amount of press attention. She's done with the royal sh*tshow and good for her.

Your observations call for the total opposite conclusion then "She was smart not to go". To the contrary, it's for those very reasons, and her children, that she should have attended that Coronation.

The Sussexes have nowhere to go but down. They're aging. Their becoming more irrelevant by the second. They going to need every ounce of exposure they can get.

She was a fool not to go.

Meghan Markle is like what Tonya Harding was to figure skating.

The only one keeping it interesting.

Seriously, if she'd gone, and taken the trouble to look crushed whenever she recieved the snubs that Harry tried to ignore, nobody would be talking about anything else today!

It was an 100% golden opportunity to make headlines without looking like she was trying to get headlines! All she had to do was react to the snubs and slights like a normal human being would, she could even have made a subtle show of smiling graciously at the snubber, and then turning to Harry with a sad look in her eye. If he'd had the sense to bring her, and give her a little hug of comfort after all those people snubbed them both, they'd have bazillions of new fans and be dominating the blogosphere!

A golden opportunity, completely missed. All they got out of it was pictures of Harry sulking.

R138... now I get "Klan Granny" - thanks for the explanation.

R129 - God you're an idiot. I just do not care about this trainwreck that is "Harry and She Who Shall Not Be Named." I hope the media ignores them for now on.

The Coronation threads have been fun until... until... the Harry and She Who Shall Not Be Named fans and enemies... arrived and started going back and forth and slamming others.

r138 Stan Grannies aka KGT (Klan Granny Trolls) are getting desperate because there isn't much defense for H&M's stupidity.

Pretty ironic for the Klan Granny at R149 to be talking about how stupid Harry and Meghan are.

What R50 said.

Sorry R150.

Last nuclear Deranger fumigant bomb

The UK tabloid rag The Express published over 100 articles about Meghan Markle in the past 72 hours.

But yeah, anybody who questions this type of behavior is "obsessed".

Yikes! The Express makes TMZ look sane in comparison.

No one gives a rats arse about two old gits. William & Kate are as dull a dishwater. But Harry & Meghan ..CHA CHING! JACKPOT!

[quote]The Coronation threads have been fun until... until... the Harry and She Who Shall Not Be Named fans and enemies... arrived and started going back and forth and slamming others.

Yes, there's no newsworthy connection between Harry and Meghan and the coronation and the royal family whatsoever. (roll eyes)

Nuclear Deranger Fumigant in 5..4..3..2..

^ At least they look the part

R109

The fuck is your problem? You and I have had zero interaction before Saturday and I’ve always remained - I think - neutral if not good-natured here so why this sudden hate and anger over my ladies in waiting dress comment? I was just trying to think of a positive comment to make during the ceremony. So what? If you disagree, move on.

And posting a YouTube video to make a point to a complete internet stranger? Bizarre and embarrassing.

Why R158

Why doesn't she embrace her curly hair?

Another silly American trying to explain away the treachery of Harold. When will they learn they are not entitled to speak on our revered Royal Family.

What is nice -there are no major royal events for a while and no need for Harry and Meghan to come one way or another . Charles will likely invite them to Balmoral when others are not around and there can be some privacy to hash things out .

R164, Does “others are not around” include Camilla?

Perhaps at some point Camilla would be included in the discussions , if not the whole time. This is mere guessing but it could make sense for this hashing out of things to happen. I realize there is zero reason for anyone to trust each other or honor privacy /confidentiality at this point .

They all looked ridiculous.

Those crowns looked ridiculous on Charles and Camilla.

They looked like they were appearing in a Carol Burnett Show sketch.

[quote]Why was Charlotte dressed like the pope?

Because I too am infallible.

This is so sad. DL fave Princess Alexandra being held up by Edward and Sophie.

^from the looks on their faces, they might let her drop the second the picture is taken

R170 No this is sad you cluless Royalass twit.

So who's this guy?

All the memes think he's someone in disguise, possibly a woman. Possibly Meghan.

Princess Alexandra was sitting next to Harry.

There's not going to be any hashing out of anything unless there are witnesses/lawyers present. But no worries, Haz is working on Spare #2, so will be busy living his best life either doing more important interviews or suing a newspaper.

Prince Edward, Duke of Edinburgh, can’t wipe the cookie smelling look off his face no matter how hard he tries, R170.

Camilla was a mess. She always appears as though she doesn't quite know what to do with herself. Or perhaps that Bourbon suppository or two dissolved at the wrong time. Figiting with the crown and brushing wisps of hair into place at crowning was not a good look. The curtsy to the King was a fail. King Charles chuckled.

R177, do they get a do over?

^ They all looked like fools.

Cringey all around.

Coronation cue cards for the royals and the clergy are the very definition of dumbed down.

R180 Be in your 70s and be expected to memorize every line and oath you must recite. This in a holy ritualistic ceremony dating back 1000 years... with the weight of the world watching and the weight of a 5 lb crown on your head. This, a ceremony not seen in 70 years.

Let's see how you do, CUNT!

^ Queen MARY!

Didn’t they use books back in the day? You read all that shit out of a book!

R181 He had 70 years to prepare. I feel like that was enough time.

William, age 40, had eight months to learn two bloody lines.

R184 CUNT. Do you Realize how IMPORTANT that moment was for him? His son HRH The Prince of Wales was LATE to the Coronation!!! All because of that little shit Prince Louis. That kid should have been aborted. There was a lot of drama leading up to the moment. THEY ENTERED AFTER HM THE KING!!!

R186 Like you even know. Try reading the court circular more often

R187 I Introduced you to the Court Circular this evening CUNT! You call yourself a Royalist? I have been reading the CC for at least 15 years.

R188 I was worshiping Princess Di, sipping tea, and admiring fancy celebratory Queen Elizabeth II plates before you were even sperm in your father's sack.

Our Queen Camilla the epitome of regal grace and elegance. Meghan can't hold a candle to this woman.

^Talk about just rolling outta bed😂

^Talk about wearing the bed.

R189 CUNT. I will always be the better Royalist than you. Go read the daily fail on your "Trendy Patio"

Just because she did her best work in bed doesn't mean she has to wear it.

Probably already been said, but R177’s comment about QC’s fidgeting with the crown (and her badly behaving FEATHERS) reminded me of the Royal expert/gossiper (not Tina Brown) on CBS saying that during rehearsals, the crown fell off Camilla’s head and somehow hit her in her face. I imagine quite the tantrum from C3 and/or QC accompanied that incident.

R177, It could have been worse.

For the last 4 years the ROTA lickspittles have been shrieking "Harry & Meghan have been shamelessly exploiting their poor children to the media.!" Now this The Big Pimp Out . Royalassts are pathetically ridiculous.😂

R195 A vast improvement.

It was so nice to watch a major event going on and nobody getting shot.

I thought it was a very moving ceremony at times. William pledged the same words to Charles the Charles did to QEII at this investiture. Very moving. Charles did have quite good pancakeakeup on. Also, does anyone know if Charles has/had a good singing voice? He loves music. Used to play the cello.

Archie could have attended but he would have behaved better than ADHD Louis and shown him up.

ByJupiter IS a Klan Granny, as he well knows.

When will Muriel ban Klan Granny CEO Surviving Angel? Her best friends Dex and the Pet Troll have been banned already.

[QUOTE] Why doesn't she embrace her curly hair?

Even most white women don't embrace their curly hair, you racist cunt. They straighten the life out of it, just like Meghan does.

The LED lighting for TV and the high def made it look like a cheesy Disneyland attraction. Ancient ceremonies in cathedrals were made for candlelight glinting off burnished gold and shimmering jewels accompanied by Burgundian chants. They are robbed of their mystique with modern technology making them look just tawdry and silly. Do it as it should be done or skip it altogether.

A lip reader said that Harry said to Beatrice's husband Jack Brooksbank (next to him):

“I’m fed up with the way they treat me.’

Sorry - Eugenie's husband. Beatrice has that hotty Italian.

It's okay, R160 - you don't understand, but everybody else does.

Bless your heart, again.

Trooping the Colour is scheduled for June 17, a little over a month after the coronation. So, more massive military on parade, a flyover, the Mall full of people waiting for a balcony appearance. It’s deja vu all over again.

Why wasn’t Sir Elton John on the balcony? Isn’t he in the line of succession now that he’s a knight and sits in the House of Lords?

let's be honest

this stupid shit was the least important event of the century

down with the monarchy! no more pampered inbreds thinking they're better simply due to birth!

R154. Haha. The pair have desperately been begging for attention ever since the Coronation was scheduled, endlessly leaking their conflicting feelings and then rudely confirming after the response date had passed. They did everything they could to make sure they verre the center of attention on the day. Now their sycophants are bitching about the success of their strategy. Everyone was paying attention to them, but unfortunately not in a glowing way.

Meghan and Harry are like the two children in class whom you try to ignore as they scream and pull your hair to get your attention. Then they are shocked that the attention you hide them is negative.

And why did they have to release a photo to detract from the coronation? An active member of the royal family would rightly be criticised for doing so. As non-working members they shouldn’t be releasing photos at any time. They are two people seeking privacy whose lives don’t have any public relevance.

[quote] to make sure they [bold]verre[/bold] the center of attention

Greta Garbo in the house, y'all!!!!

Is it just me or do others think that there must be a lot of loony teenagers on here recently? I’m thinking of people like R186, maybe they are just druggies waiting for their next delivery of crack or whatever it is they use.

[quote] Is it just me or do others think that there must be a lot of loony teenagers on here recently? I’m thinking of people like [R186], maybe they are just druggies waiting for their next delivery of crack or whatever it is they use.

Yup.

And those that laud Markle and her sociopathic actions are coo-coo for cocoa puffs. These crazies seem to be coming out of the woodwork here lately.

R202 whatever bitch! I'm sick of ironed flat Kardashian hair.

Every white woman got spiral perms in the 80s you racial cunt!

Bring back curly hair!

R212 The British Royal Family is the most important institution in the world. Excuse me for getting a bit emotional when I see people talk them down or worse, republican rhetoric such as “abolish the monarchy”. King Charles is the representative of the universal force. Show some respect.

What R215 said, but sincerely.

I loved the part of the ceremony where Charles was in a simple tunic to show his humility before god and then his transformation into the king and the "pope" of the Anglican Church. A medieval play and chess game in real time 1000 yrs on. Really fucking spectacular!!

[quote] Also, does anyone know if Charles has/had a good singing voice? He loves music. Used to play the cello.

I don't know if he still plays music, but he is quite a good painter, as well.

[quote]When will Muriel ban Klan Granny CEO Surviving Angel? Her best friends Dex and the Pet Troll

I blocked all those old cunts ages ago but good to hear but are we sure they don't have socks? Are we even sure they were not SA socks? By Jupiter is def a granny.

[quote] Markle as spotted in the Wuhan Lab wearing a white lab coat unleashing Covid and she’s the bad seed spawn of someone spotted on the grassy knoll.

I don't usually go for conspiracy theories but I rather like this one.

I love this picture of Princess Anne's home. She look like she is ready to order take-pizza and watch telly for the night.

No Coronation medals for the first time since George IV. Charles' office and the Government are squabbling over who should receive them, the cost of them, and the Government says there is a metal shortage.

No King Charles Royal Family Order for favored Royal ladies. George IV gave them to his sisters, sisters-in-law, and some nieces. William IV gave only one...to his wife Queen Adelaide. Queen Victoria, Kings Edward VII, George V, George VI all had Royal Family Orders given to many female relatives. Elizabeth II was less generous, having just over a dozen made for her mother, grandmother, sister, daughter, three daughters-in-law, one granddaughter-in-law, cousin and cousin's wives, and her aunts. Sarah, Duchess of York, her daughters, and Princess Michael of Kent were all notable omissions.

The Royal Family Orders are paid for by the sovereign from personal funds, and Charles is known to be a cheap cunt when it comes to anyone but Camilla.

Could somebody tell that Klan Granny Troll this is a website for gay men not for homophobic black women. Fuck off.

Matt Berry commentating, s funny

R173 That is composer Sir Karl Jenkins

R225, Not composer Paul Williams?

Little House On the Prairie reboot?

^Meghan is so jealous she can't wear these lovely frocks!

WTF is it 2023 or 1933?

Scary lot indeed.

That's an Inspector Clouseau disguise!

Sorry but I find those dresses a bit risqué for royalty.

R225 He's been outed

They look like extras in Downton Abbey. 😂

[quote] Elizabeth II was less generous, having just over a dozen made for her mother, grandmother, sister, daughter, three daughters-in-law, one granddaughter-in-law, cousin and cousin's wives, and her aunts.

I'm confused. Eliz II didn't have any "daughters-in-law" (let alone granddaughters in law) when she had her coronation, if "coronation medals" is what you're talking about.

Daily Express poll Prince Harry wins overwhelming. Suck it up old bitches.

Oh, and R160 - you're not a "complete internet stranger" to [italic]anybody[/italic] on this forum. You're a housewife to a man - check. You're a bitch with a taste for the basic, the tacky and the ugly - check. You're not much on the way of intelligence (you're stupid) - check. You are, on the other hand, MUCH on the way of entitlement - double check. We've all met you a million times before.

You'll have to figure out the rest of it for yourself.

[quote] Elizabeth II was less generous, having just over a dozen made for her mother, grandmother, sister, daughter, three daughters-in-law, one granddaughter-in-law, cousin and cousin's wives, and her aunts.

[quote] I'm confused. Eliz II didn't have any "daughters-in-law" (let alone granddaughters in law) when she had her coronation, if "coronation medals" is what you're talking about.

Not coronation medals. She had a Royal Family Order as had monarchs before her....

[quote] No King Charles Royal Family Order for favored Royal ladies. George IV gave them to his sisters, sisters-in-law, and some nieces. William IV gave only one...to his wife Queen Adelaide. Queen Victoria, Kings Edward VII, George V, George VI all had Royal Family Orders given to many female relatives. Elizabeth II was less generous, having just over a dozen made for her mother, grandmother, sister, daughter, three daughters-in-law, one granddaughter-in-law, cousin and cousin's wives, and her aunts. Sarah, Duchess of York, her daughters, and Princess Michael of Kent were all notable omissions.

R236, where is the evidence that is a Daily Express poll?

The first recipients of Elizabeth II's Royal Family Order were given them months prior to her coronation. They were her mother, Queen Elizabeth, The Queen Mother, Queen Mary (who ended up dying before the coronation took place), Princess Margaret (her sister), the then Duchess of Gloucester (her Aunt Alice), the then Dowager Duchess of Kent (her Aunt Marina), Princess Alexandra (her cousin), the then Princess Royal (her Aunt Mary, Dowager Countess of Harewood), and her great-aunt, Princess Alice, Countess of Athlone (a granddaughter of Queen Victoria and wife to Queen Mary's brother).

Princess Alice of Athlone had the Royal Family orders of Queen Victoria (her grandmother), King Edward VII (her uncle), King George V (her first cousin and brother-in-law), King George VI (her nephew), and Queen Elizabeth II (her great-niece).

When did Charles get his ears pinned back? I was looking forward to seeing his former jug ears underneath the crown.

R236 That supposed poll is absolute bullshit and nobody believes it.

R241, They were pinned back when he was a child.

I don't think so, R243.

R244, They were much worse at birth.

When Prince William was born, the queen reportedly said, 'At least he hasn't got his father's ears.'

R236 you clipped a random poll without siting any actual source or proof. You could have created that out of your ass and posted it.

R247 - This is an online poll. Jack into the Daily Express and you too can vote.

[quote]They were much worse at birth.

They were worse?! Jesus wept.

Was Penny Knatchbull (Prince Philip's side piece) @ the Coronation? I didn't see any pics of her.

R250 I'd be surprised if that harlot can still walk!

[quote] Was Penny Knatchbull (Prince Philip's side piece) @ the Coronation? I didn't see any pics of her.

Yes, she was there with her husband, the current Earl Mountbatten. They were seated in one of the back rows of the "family" section. I think they were the only members of the Mountbatten family invited.

Princess Philips's side piece, her ex-husband, the newly crown King, his ex-side piece/second wife/new Queen, and the new Queen's ex-husband. Cozy!!

And a grim reaper/orthodox priest/lay church acolyte! So many surprising attendees.

Princess Philips's side piece, her ex-husband

R253 - Penny Knatchbull, Princess Philips's side piece, and her husband, Norton Knatchbull, 3rd Earl Mountbatten of Burma, are separated but they are NOT divorced.

[quote]Charles did have quite good pancakeakeup on.

I thought that too and it gave him a sort of "embalmed" look; that & I never noticed how stooped he appeared. That said, both & Camilla are no youngsters, so even though the did look rather tottery at times, that's probably to be expected. Plus, the run up this extravaganza had to be hugely successful.

I kind of feel bad for Charles - stuck between the World's Beloved Granny Liz & Handsome & Charismatic Will & Kate, the press is going to be tough on him.

*stressful* - not successful!

Charismatic will and kate? Roflmao. You klan grannies are hilarious.

William actually does have a bit of charisma, or presence, perhaps because he's always the tallest and fittest man in any crowd he appears in.

And the impression of charisma can last right up to the moment he opens his mouth and boring platitudes come out...

He looks like any other balding middle-aged guy to me with the Windsor horse genes, of course. Kate is just dry and brittle looking and also boring.

Seethe, Clit Grannies.

I was watching C&C during the Coronation particularly in those occasions when they were getting up and/or down from the various seating, kneeling parts. Being so careful to not trip over small footstools, etc.

Especially after having a heavy crown on their heads.

Seeing Camilla, getting up from the red chair, having to step down a short step, as she reached briefly over toward the man on her right in case she needed a bit of help.

And Charles then walking out at the end of the service, with heavy crown on his head, heavy robes, carrying the orb in one hand and sceptre in the other - that is no mean feat for anyone, much less someone in their mid 70s. Especially with 2000 people watching in person and millions watching (or who will watch) on video.

I was watching BBC coverage and was wondering how ever the pair were going to climb into that golden coach. Video had already shown that the height of the floor of the coach appeared to be comparable to the middle of the chests of the soldiers walking beside it. Probably cameras were not allowed to photograph them climbing into the coach. Again, not an easy thing to do in your 70s, particularly with robes, crowns, etc.

After the ceremony, BBC interviewed one of the two women who were Camilla's attendants. (The other attendant was Camilla's sister.) The woman interviewed mentioned something about all the practicing that was done, part of it, climbing into the coach.

Charles and Camilla did a great job.

Factor in that they were exhausted by the time the cameras started rolling. Its not like they sprung out of bed an hour before showtime. Plus all the peripheral coronation engagements in the days leading up to the event. Plus having to put up with Harry's 24/7 ridiculously selfish nonsense.

The whole affair was fantastic!

The only STAR they've got wins in a landslide yet again. LOL

So it's a "fake poll" unless my crone wins. Positively Trumpian gran.

R263 Sure Klan. The hardest working kids in show biz!

LOL . Billy and Katie both looked snockered off their royal arses. Thought on "black sheep" Harry behaved in such a un regal way.

r265 It's long been obvious to me that the mindset of big Trump supporters and big Harry and Meghan fans has a lot of overlap. Facts are negotiable depending on if they suit, everything is a grand conspiracy by other powers and they are blameless. Their opinions are facts, other opinions are lies etc etc As you said Trumpian. They have a lot in common.

For all Charles' talk about wanting to modernize the monarchy, he still takes mental note of who bows/curtsys to him. He says nothing if he doesn't receive a bow or curtsy, but he remembers and will avoid meeting the offender again in future. He also got quite irritated if non-family members addressed him as "Charles" or even as "Prince Charles". He was a stickler for the "Your Royal Highness" and "Sir" thing. That won't change now that he's King and "His Majesty".

His brother Andrew is the same way as is their fossilized cousin, the Duke of Kent, and Prince and Princess Michael of Kent. Anne, Edward, Sophie and the rest of the lot really don't give a damn if they are bowed or curtsied to or how they are addressed. Anne used to be like her brother, but at some point let the formality go. If she's in a mood and you address her as "Anne", she might pretend you don't exist, but if you address her as "Princess Anne", that's sufficiently formal enough for her.

r269 I have genuinely never heard that applied to the Duke of Kent?

The Kents are Princes in their own rights - just as Wlliam is Prince of Wales in his own right

Love these two princesses!

New photo of the King and his two male heirs.

The King and Queen with their pages and Ladies in Attendance.

r271 Yes i know.I meant I have never heard that he is very particular about people addrssing him probably in full by title the way Charles is.

^ Cunt & Cuntette 😂

Sophie certainly is becoming a star in her own right. I never really noticed her before but she's down to Earth and hard-working.

R201 and R219 Dex? Whatever became of him?

R269 is yet another American pulling “facts” out of his arse.

You invented that entire post, didn’t you R269?

Why?

Your King is a Piece of Shite

^ You King is a Piece of Shite

Prince Harry was right when he told this in Spare. What kind of amoral scum would do this to their own wives and children and what kind of amoral royalassts cultists would kiss their wrinkled arses? Filth.

Smell smoke Pa?

The only think worse then this weak adulterous narcissistic manbaby are his toadies,flunkies,arse kisser and assorted grovelers in the media who act as well paid apologists for Charles The Feckless and his Queen Cuntmilla. The British have become a truly servile pathetic lot.

[quote] Was Penny Knatchbull (Prince Philip's side piece) @ the Coronation? I didn't see any pics of her.

[quote] Yes, she was there with her husband, the current Earl Mountbatten. They were seated in one of the back rows of the "family" section. I think they were the only members of the Mountbatten family invited.

Lady Pamela Hicks, first cousin to Prince Philip and a bridesmaid at Philip and Lilibet's wedding received a phone call from a secretary in Charles' office explaining that due to limited seating in the Abbey, she would not be receiving an invitation to the Coronation. Lady Pamela's daughter assured the media that "my mother was NOT offended and understood".

R279 R280 R281 R282 R283 R284

But at least, “the British”, R284, have a mastery of the English language.

You’re not big on sub-editing, are you, R284?

Lady Pamela Hicks is 94. I’m sure she was relieved not to be invited.

Prince Harry is spot on: the British media is an arm of the royal family PR machine. ROTA's symbiotic relationship with the Palace has regular British people in a chokehold of misinformation, lies, and corruption.Yet you cultist Royalassts lap it all up. Pathetic indeed.

r289 The Daily Mail court papers in 2021 showed Harry and Meghan are experienced leaders to the media.

The only STAR they had and they cancel him. The BRF are truly dolts like their acolytes😂

Paybacks a bitch bro.

A behind-the-scenes video released from the Prince and Princess of Wales.

Check out the new direction the Wales are taking with this reality style BTS of the coronation that was just released including glimpses inside their place at Kensington Palace. I really like the direction they are going with their new social media director. This is very slick. Sussexes - eat your heats out. This is what Netflix was paying 100M+ for.

R294 please see R293.

When I read about her letter to her father I knew she was writing it more for the public.

Harry and Meghan are now the Duke and Duchess of Irrelevance

Harry and Meghan were cut off financially by Buckingham Palace, but have built a media empire based on being the #1 British villain. Archie’s grandkids will go to college thanks to Piers Morgan’s intense hatred of his mother.

R298 giggle. The whole lot will be dead broke in 3 years. They spend 10X more money than they make. Markle never had any money and Harry never handled any. They'll be bled dry by Harry's addiction to lawsuits and her addiction to publicity and OTT spending.

A Eurovision surprise from the Princess of Wales. I love that blue color on Kate.

Lovely photos to highlight the dress and Kate's luscious locks.

[quote] The only STAR they had and they cancel him. The BRF are truly dolts like their acolytes😂

If you think Harold is a STAR, then more power to you, R291.

The ginger, friar-tuck, close-set eyed, whiny, lying, “mummy”-obsessed, beta-male look just doesn’t appeal to the majority of well-balanced humans in the global population.

What kind of scumbag dad leaks negative info on his teen son to the media to try to make his own sorry arse look good? If you believe King Tampex knew nothing about this and his PR Manager did this all by his lonesome you're either a Royalasst shill or an imbecile. Which is it? Your twat king is a piece of shite husband and father. Harry's better off an orphan.

^R303, you are a repetitive poster.

You’ve already posted this EXACT, SAME post.

No wonder you are a Harkle shrill. You cannot - for the life of you - come up with new material.

You, just like the regurgitating Harkles, have to upchuck and recycle the same old material.

R302 Hands out of your fanny granny.

R303 - I'll do one better, Harry would have been better off aborted.

Pathetic, R305: resorting to inane photoshops to drum up support for “hostage Harry”. Can’t even come up with a reality-based response to R302 ‘s statements.

Carry on living in your delusional fantasies….just like the harkles…..until their isolation corners them and everything comes crashing down on top of them…,

And for repeat poster (R303), here’s your vomited detritus spewed throughout DL:

The reality is DataLounge is an American Gay Gossip Site. We like to look at hawt men like Prince Harry. We are not old biddies who get are desiccated fannies in a lather over 75 yr old hag Cuntmilla and her 74yo sub King Tampon. That's your cuppa Hyacinth. Try some ginger todger .If you remember what one is.😂

Are all of the posts I keep reading about tampax/tampons on multiple threads posted by the same troll?

[quote] We like to look at hawt men like Prince Harry.

Once AGAIN, R308, R305, R291, most are living in reality in regards to Haz.

Your claims of “hawt H”, fall on deaf ears, especially when you post delusional photoshops of someone who is constantly in the public eye….

R301 this is the best Kate has ever looked. Gorgeous dress and hair. Looks like a queen.

Trolling you biddies is like tying cans to grannie's walker but far more amusing.😂

The royal threads used to be so good on DL and now they are plagued with trolls. It pains me to say that I think Reddit has better threads and discussions lately, fraus and all.

The crowns looked HUGE on their heads.

[quote]The crowns looked HUGE on their heads.

The crowns kept reminding me of the old Imperial Margarine commercials.

He looked more "regal" then Charlie.

Wow, Kate look amazing. Relaxed, happy, and confident. That dress is spectacular

How much does Markle pay her social media trolls? Is it worthwhile?

THREE YEARS gone fron the UK, and the Clit Grannies have no references outside of the BRF for the Sussexes. Good luck Clitties!

R313, a couple of years ago BRF and Markle threads attracted Markle haters who think she faked her pregnancies and her kids aren't real, now it seems the threads have been inundated by Markle fanatics from sites like Celebitchery or Lainey gossip. The latest group doesn't have much imagination.

Interest in the Sussexes is down after the massive attention they received for their Netflix series and Harry's book. People have moved on waitign for the next thing,

I tend to agree with R299 -- that, although Harry made money on the book, they are unlikely to have any more serious moneymaking enterprises in the future. They've shot their wad, unless Harry can produce more scandal from the past. And the public's perception of them is very negative, so their options are fewer. And they do keep spending. My guess is that, five years from now, they will be in a panic without serious income. What fascinates me about their lawsuits against the newspapers is that the newspapers figured this out decades ago: each lawsuit increases the newspaper's circulation and thus its income. The British press doesn't really care about lawsuits. Suing them is a fool's errand. William was wise to quietly settle.

Next on : Dancing With The Stars!

^ When does she break out her pole?

She can borrow her hubby's pole.

If Rosie can get it out of his arse.

Obviously my r290 post meant to say Harry and Meghan are experienced leakers to the media.

^ Obvious only to loons like yourself doll.

Heard from inside sources that all these guest appearances on TV are leading up to the Bravo announcement. The Camilla portions are said to be quite stale but producers peg the Rose & Kate interactions as "must see TV"

R303 you really need some new material, don’t you, you sad queen?

Heard from sources that William has signed with SC.

W&K are really stepping up their production output, the longer coronation video and Kate playing the piano at Eurovision.

I can play the invisible piano.

Kate gets some attention so these two clowns have to be photographed going out for sushi.

Don't you think the royals are probably laughing behind the scenes at whatever native dances they're partaking in?

Kate gave Camilla the side eye when the American preacher was going on about love. Camilla and Charles openly laughed on stage at the Inuit singing which did sound like humping noises but still.

They are stuffy about protocol and most seem to be snobs. Only Harry seemed to really enjoy his time in Africa as an escape from that overbearing life.

r334 I think the sideeye might have been because they knew of Meghans bullying and diva antics behind the scenes.

There's absolutely nothing stopping Harry visiting Africa now.

"And they do keep spending."

R321 - How do you know this? Are you the bookkeeping clerk? Do you balance their checkbooks? Are you their CPA?

It's not amusing, but really sad that Markle lovers and acolytes can only seem to pose juvenile scatology.

Does this suggest that hers and Harry's fans are poised to accept the reciprocal fetal sandwiches they generously toss out to grateful women in their charitable efforts?

[quote]It's not amusing, but really sad that Markle lovers and acolytes can only seem to pose juvenile scatology.

Give me a fucking break. I've seen the demented fantasies you Klan Grannies pull out of your asses and swear are true.

Spontanous,unrehearsed ,without an autotune tract over dubbed and production crew of 24. But then Diana was a real Princess . Party planners daughter take note.

R60 I hated the Kingdom Gospel choir.

They were dirge-like at Harry’s wedding and minor at the Coronation. The patronising reception they received at both events was at best awkward.

Knowing that Harold's heart and soul belongs to "Africa," and of course how close Sparkles is to her roots, the world breathlessly awaits the Sussex Saves Africa documentary coming very soon.

[quote]Markle lovers and acolytes

What Markle lovers and acolytes? Most of us didn't pay attention to her until you klan grannies started posting incessantly about her. I'm not even sure what she's done to piss off you old cunts and not interested enough to find out.

That said, who's sad? I'd have to say it's people reading gossip rags and obsessing about a stranger.

R340 I was hoping the gospel choir would break into something more appropriate to the occasion like the theme song to The Jeffersons.

Cuz we're movin' on up ...

R343, Or . . .

Ok I get not wanting to invite the father's side. They're embarrassing trash and threw her under the bus. That makes sense

But doesn't Doria have siblings? Parents? Why was she the only one at the wedding? That's sad. At least invite Doria's family.

Sparkles is embarrassed by her family, all of em, but especially the black side, a non-entity in her eyes. She "didn't know she was black" until she married Harold.

r339 I think thats probably just more reflective of the reality that in the UK women from very higher social class or wealthier backgrounds are more likely to learn the piano and indeed any musical instrument. Princess Margaret used to play the piano as I think the Duchess of Kent does also. I just felt it was a nice touch, to a beautifully done Eurovision by Liverpool, by Catherine to show UK solidarity with Ukraine especially as it was only because of Putins war they didnt host it. Having the wife of the heir to the British throne really does send a message that the BRitish state and establishment backs Ukraine in every way.

r342/r338, so many words? So easily set off...

Where was Andrew sitting during coronation? I have seen so many photos and can't seen to spot Andrew in the crowds at the Abbey.

Forgot where I got this: front row, left to right, facing from altar: 1 william 2 princess charlotte 3 prince louis (george was a page). 4 kate. 5 edward 6 sophie. SECOND ROW: edward kids 7 james, earl of wessex (15 or 16) now his parents are duke & duchess of edinburgh. 8 lady louise windsor (19), 9 duke of gloucester (qe’s 1st cousin). 10 duchess of gloucester. 11 vice admiral sir timothy lawrence (anne’s husband). 12 anne princess royal. 13 duke of kent (another 1st cousin).

THIRD ROW: 14 andrew. 15 beatrice. 16 edoardo mapelli mozzi. 17 eugenie. 18 jack brooksbank. 19 harry. 20 princess alexandra (1st cousin & her mother was philip’s 1st cousin). FOURTH ROW 21 prince michael (brother of the duke of kent & princess alexandra). 22 princess michael of kent. 23 peter philips, anne’s son & qeii’s eldest grandson. 24 zara. 25 mike tindall, zara’s husb. 26 david armstrong-jones, 2nd erl of snowdown, first cousin of charles & only son of margaret & antony armstrong-jones, professionally known as David Linley, honorary chairman of Christie’s auction house.

In the fifth row were Lady Sarah Chatto, Daniel Chatto, Samuel Chatto, Alexander Windsor, Lady Davina Lewis, Lady Rose Gilman and George Windsor.

River did a whole video on some scandals involving Princess Alexandra that have some similarities to the crap going on with Harry. It starts at about minute 23, if anybody's interested. He thinks that's why she was put next to Harry.

Oh and earlier in the video, I think he says that it was Anne's idea herself to sit in front of Harry with that huge feather sort of blocking his view. Fun to think about anyway. And someone said it looks like she's greeting him at one point, but she's chastizing him and/or talking to one of her immediate family instead - her daughter Zara I think.

Anne's a dyke right?

R352, is a liar

[quote]R352 is a liar.

This thread is filled with liars.

R333 They are so predictable. Are they too stupid to be aware of it?

R354 I didn't say it - I thought I remembered River saying it in that video I linked to. Apologies if I remembered incorrectly. I sort of listened to him while doing housework and not paying close attention.

352 you and River are both liars

LOL. I guess so.

I wonder what the Internet would tell about who you really are.

R337 - What is a " reciprocal fetal sandwich"???

R353 - Absolutely NOT! Anne is quite the opposite of a dyke.

Anne definitely seems to like men.

So sheseems to be a butch straight woman. They do exist, although you don't usually see the butch come out in straight women until they're over 40.

Why did they put Princess Zara in the back?

Was Arthur Chatto, Princess Margaret’s grandson, there?

R339 I think it's reflective of the fact that Princess Diana was not a pre packaged phony bitch like Waite Katie.

[quote]I love that blue color on Kate.

It's the colour blue of the Ukrainian flag. She's playing a tribute to Ukraine and wearing one as well.

Katie is paying tribute to Meghan. Yet again.😂

Kate must have aides working 24/7 checking photos of the Duchess of Sussex wardrobe. Katie seems to wear the same outfits as Meghan approx a month later. Katie has zero personal chic or style so it's understandable. What you'd expect from a stewardess daughter. Aren't even you dowdy Brits embarrassed?

If Katie wants to be Meghan so badly the first thing she needs to do is find a faithful husband.

Well done Catherine.

R367 & R368 - Meghan does NOT copy Kate and Kate does NOT copy Meghan.

There are only X-amount of stylish looks out there if you want to be up-to-the-minute in fashion that suit an under 50 member of the BRF.

Does anyone want these royal gals to dress Laura Ingalls sisterwife- prairie style like Samantha Cameron or Carrie Johnson?

So many missing posts. Is someone compulsively posting the same memes again? Christ, poor thing must have a brain lesion or something.

R371 Apparently someone does dear.

FYI : DATA LOUNGE is an AMERICAN site. So BUGGER OFF Klan Grannies!

R374 Gee we wonder why?

What did he do? Wow he pushed a wheelchair!? ?

?

R376 Ridiculous frau

What did he do? Wow he delivered a pizza!?

I don't push wheelchairs I play piano on game shows! Wow!

They don't ever do shit. Smile for some photographs and hug people.

It only mattered when Diana did it because she hugged an AIDS patient and brought awareness to landmines.

R379 But did the crazy bitch deliver pizzas? Huh. Cat got your stupid American tongue!

R364 No.

R381, He’s Charles’ second cousin.

R382 First cousin once removed, actually.

R383, Either way, he’s definitely swoon worthy.

R374 he can eat shit actually

The poor little flower. Perhaps he looks less pervy by candlelight?

The Scousers loved Katie. Another crowd pleaser in that family.

WTF?

^ I feel her pain.

Haz is a lying, whinging grifter.

His wife is a dark triad narcissist.

Evil couple.

Can't wait for Charlotte's book😂

R388

R388 Ridiculous couple even their daughter knows it.

r387 You do realise how many non scousers travelled into Liverpool for Eurovision? The tickets for the show itself and surrounding venues were not reserved for locals. William and Kate got an excellent reception when they opened the Royal Liverpool hospital at the beginning of the year. Booing is nearly always a tiny minority nagnified by the clickbait economy in parts of the media and internet. Would a small number of Trump supporters turning up boo Joe Biden in say New York amount to a rejection of Biden by New York? Of course not. Ascribing disproportionate influence to a loud minority is both foolish and a temptation too many on all sides of arguments give in to. I for one never hyped the idea of Harry getting booed at the Coronation or Meghan if they'd both gone because in reality most people who dislike them would ignore or engage in silence. Booing only a loud unrepresentative minority take part in.

Oh look, Harry and Meghan arranged a car chase n New York, just in time for his court hearing to try to get the UK taxpayers to pay for his security ("to protect his family") as a non-working Royal.

One wonders who arranged the 'terrifying' incident and how much that headline cost them.

[quote]One wonders who arranged the 'terrifying' incident and how much that headline cost them.

Youi tell us. Just pull the answer out of your ass like all you Klan Grannies do.

R395 - you have posted that exact same comment on three different British Royal Family threads?

Who is paying YOU? How much did it cost YOUR pay master?

"Youi tell us. Just pull the answer out of your ass like all you Klan Grannies do."

He's claiming a "two-hour high-speed chase" in Manhattan, and I thought Manhattan was all stop-and-go and it's physically impossible to get anywhere at high speed for ten minutes. Wouldn't two hours of anyone having a high-speed chase there would make international headlines, because it'd involve breaking 200 million traffic laws and attract every damn cop in a car on the whole island?

So yeah, I'm calling bullshit.

I'm gonna make "Coronation Baked Eggs" for lunch. No fiddling with crust, but gonna make baked eggs with spinach, lima beans (since I can't get broad beans), tarragon, and cheddar cheese. I'll let you know how it turns out.

Poor Clittie Grannies will take it hard to hear that the 2 hour pursuit story is a lie.

The coronation baked eggs are tasty enough that I'll make them again, maybe even make a proper quiche some time!

But the recipe is the sort of thing one makes for a high-protein main dish at home, not the sort of thing one serves to guests.

A Performative "car chase" - now that's a new one!

They're utter clowns.

R402 I'm just sick of hearing about them at this point. Just like the Kardashians. Wish they would put Kim in a room with whatever sister she's fighting with now for a fight to the death, with no one walking out.

So stop clicking on the royals threads if you're sick of them, R403!

It's not like they aren't clearly labeled.

I get you R403. We need a better level of gossip. It's quite sad.

Andrew has never been "fragile". Never.

Big Willy rowing. Look at those legs!