Everyone's Favorite Half-Black, Jew-ish Tubby Lying Queen: Part 5 of the George Santos Thread

People keep saying it was a traditional Democratic district to begin with are ignoring that the lines were redrawn before this election and it became more Republican. And it was not Republican gerrymandering. The Democrats in Albany gerrymandered all the districts so badly that a court stepped and redrew the lines. But even in the old district prior to the Democratic congressman before Santos it had been long represented by a very popular Republican Peter King who retired. But I don’t know what King’s district lines looked like. My guess is that it is. “Purple” district. If the GOP can induce King to return they might hold it.

No, King was on the south shore. This district was represented by Steve Israel (D) and Tom Suozzi (D) since 2000 prior to being redrawn.

Pete King was the rep for NY-03 until 2013, not 2000. It’s a swing district that has mostly voted Democratic in the past decade.

King fucking sucked

King was a decent old fashioned Republican and a union supporter.

King was anti-gay and voted against us whenever he could. I called his office and wrote letters in the 90s when Long Beach was still part of -03. He wrote back a very cordial letter hoping I might overlook those issues and find areas where we agreed. But I still voted against him.

On non-gay issues he was a voice of reason in the Republican Party. He voted against the Clinton impeachment and for 9-11 survivors.

What lie did he tell today?

Perhaps not today, but back in 2017.

He was questioned by the Secret Service, so you know damn well he lied his fat ass off.

And another protest today to boot him.

R8 That sounds like the kind of scam our Georgie would be involved in.

You'd be hard-pressed to find a scam that wouldn't sound like this douchebag would be involved in.

If it's a scam of any sort, he'd be involved.

R8, the sleaze keeps piling up with this guy

This guy isn't just some conniving part-time drag queen grifter. He's a serious felon.

Does he have only one or two jackets?

2 jackets and 1 pair of dumb-ass looking glasses.

His Orlando roomie & crimin' bra Gustavo looks kind of hot in the security photo.

Old family friend for sure.

He actually does look hot.

FINALLY! Someone in the Democratic corner is starting think!

Help Georgie bring them ALL down

Billboards aren't enough though. Democrats have to come up with a fantastic ground operation.

Good for them!

They absolutely should make him the face of that party everywhere.

But he is not the face of the GOP. To do that R19 would be mere propaganda.

Pointing out a liar, criminal, thief, and corrupt person whose crimes his own party actively ignores and by extension accepts is "mere propaganda"?

No. He should be held up as the paragon for repig values.

Yes he's guilty but the Party is not.

Wow, I thought he was a Na'vi.

Right, R20/R22--because the GOP would NEVER make a blanket accusation against all Democrats by holding up one of their own as the face of its party.

Just like the GOP WOULD NEVER be yelling and screaming every day that Democrats were doing nothing to remove said corrupt lying congressman from Congress if the shoe were on the other foot.

The GOP IS collectively guilty of not removing him from Congress for everything he's done. They have the numbers to and they won't. Please don't waste your time pearl clutching that it's unfair to say Santos is not the face of a corrupt party, because he is and they are.

[quote] that it's unfair to say Santos is the face of a corrupt party

Fixed.

R26 is right. They could pressure him to resign but they're not doing that.

And there are Republicans like Elise Stefanik who endorsed him, too, and are still standing by him

[quote]Yes he's guilty but the Party is not.

When his party admits as much and makes efforts to remove him from his ill-gotten seat, THEN I'll believe they're not guilty either. Until that time, however, they are just as complicit in this mess.

The GOP is 100% complicit.

R22, the GOP is 100% guilty. They knew about his lies when he was campaigning yet did nothing. Now everyone knows about his lies and corruption and the party is refusing to remove him from Congress. He really is the face of the party.

McCarthy went in as the Speaker knowing this guy lied his ass off and totally misled the district's constituents, and McCarthy said and did nothing. And still does nothing. McCarthy is literally the face of the House GOP. One-hundred-percent complicit and corrupt.

From the article at r18:

[quote]Santos has recently been telling people [bold]he is considering running for a second term,[/bold] according to multiple Republican sources, after previously signaling to Republicans he wouldn’t seek reelection.

There was no doubt in our collective minds here that he was lying when he acquiesced to the party by saying he wouldn't run again. He's so full of shit it's no surprise his eyes are brown.

Once again Republicans show they'll do absolutely anything for power. Santos is a ghetto swindler, but he's right at home. He's just the crook to trust with the republican "agenda". If it wasn't so dangerous, it would be comical.

He's talking about running for a second term so he can "legally" charge expenses to the campaign, which he's done already.

Andy Ogles (the other one)

He'll get away with all of his mess too...

Oh dear!

Weird I was told I reached my monthly free article limit. But it's March 2. I have not been reading NY Magazine. ^

R38, here's the article unpaywalled.

Thanks, R39. I'm reading the article now. Clearly these are all people who hold no scruples, ethics, or morals. This is a group of people where only fame is the objective and it is obvious to me that they are all of the reality TV culture. From the article;

[quote]Sitting beside Santos, smirking, is his bald and bearded 31-year-old “director of operations.” His name is Vish Burra. He’s a former drug dealer from Staten Island who, while he worked for Steve Bannon, was the guy you went through if you wanted to check out the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop. He also did crisis comms for Matt Gaetz, and, along with Santos, was part of a mini-MAGA cabal that took over the New York Young Republican Club. The club is run by Burra and Santos’s buddy, Gavin Wax.

This is good...

[quote]When he isn’t in Washington working on Capitol Hill for Santos, Burra lives here at home with his parents, in Rosebank.

Damn, what kind of a lowlife works for Matt Gaetz, Steve Bannon, AND George Santos?

R41, someone who hates all human life.

[quote]His name is Vish Burra. He’s a former drug dealer from Staten Island

His name is Vish Burra. He’s a drug dealer from Staten Island

Fixded!

R41, the Republican Party is full of lowlifes.

It's simply all about trying to get fame.

Tweeted by NY Republicans and then retweeted by Vish Burra

Stolen lapdogs sold by Santos in a fake animal charity scam?

Surely you've heard of that little tidbit, ElderLez r46.

Yes, seems an odd choice of words in that tweet under the circumstances.

Oh, OK, I gotcha, hun. I didn't think you hadn't heard about it, but wanted to be sure.

Re: the NYMag article. Meh… I had high hopes for a challenging write-up but it’s just a Republican puff piece. The Burra guy seems like another Bannon, McInnes, etc.

They only seem to interview vapid, GOP insiders who praise Santos, “Oh he’s throwing it back in their face! He’s got plans!” (Heard it before! That’s what they all say) No actual specifics.

Plus they make that “party” at the beginning seem like some kind of glamorous banger, “Santos holds court…” LOL! But then you look at the photos and it looks like Sunday dinner at the local cafeteria with your grandparents.

[quote]Re: the NYMag article. Meh… I had high hopes for a challenging write-up but it’s just a Republican puff piece. LOL! But then you look at the photos and it looks like Sunday dinner at the local cafeteria with your grandparents.

There's that idiom of "It's the squeaky wheel that gets the oil"

Stop at 1:18 to get a good sense and overview of the audience...

Ya see? This is why the rule of law is dead and these people will get away with this. God forbid if you're a person of color and is caught with a joint. Your life is ruined. Willingly lying to the court, to the Judge, and a catalyst for the overthrow of an election and government, simply gets you censured...

[quote]Michael Melito, an attorney for Ellis, told CNN in a statement, “My client remains a practicing attorney in good standing in the State of Colorado. In a very heated political climate, we have secured that correct outcome.”

What a joke!

A censure is a very serious matter and can have an extremely deleterious effect on your life and career.

Could you provide examples of lawyers who experience deleterious effects upon their lives after being censured? Or is your comment sarcasm?

[quote]Public or private censure is a reprimand by a body administering the ethics rules. Some refer to this as a “slap on the wrist,” but clients MIGHT BE INCLINED to find alternate representation if they know their attorney was censured.

Um, r55, did you even bother to check the signature box?

Unfuckingbelieveable

Wow, what cons hasn't this guy pulled?

Apparently, his attorney in Brazil is a convicted murderer.

He’s a winner! The most corrupt politician in American history. New York Number One!

R60, he’s probably not even in the running for the most corrupt but he may be the politician who has committed the greatest variety of crimes, and in a short span of time, too.

Jesus Christ! When will this cunt be indicted?

His care for a fantom pet fish reveals his true animal-loving nature.

Luckily for George, he was never evicted from a Kushner owned property.

Deadbeat tenant with a fake fish tank. LOL.

[quote]His care for a fantom pet fish

Is that anything like a goldfish?

I read the article in R57 last night, same day that it was published. I think Santos is finished as a public figure. The article has the ring of truth and there are secondary witnesses who can back it up. I think Santos will be out of Congress within a week, by next Friday, at the latest. Faced with that kind of criminality, even the Republikunts will have to drive him out toot sweet. He's in serious legal trouble.

[quote]toot sweet.

Oh, dear!

When the money leads to Russia, NO ONE in the media/ DOJ/FBI congress, any other normal person, I suppose, wants to follow it.

Mueller..... Mueller....Mueller?

R67, it was a joke, dickbreath.

Are you really using dickbreath as an insult?

On a gay board?

Filed paperwork to allow him to raise money for reelection

Despite claiming he wouldn't run again

[quote]I read the article in [R57] last night, same day that it was published. I think Santos is finished as a public figure. The article has the ring of truth and there are secondary witnesses who can back it up. I think Santos will be out of Congress within a week, by next Friday, at the latest. Faced with that kind of criminality, even the Republikunts will have to drive him out toot sweet. He's in serious legal trouble.

Dream on.

When it comes to legal jeopardy, he is in trouble, R72. Would YOU like the FBI, Congress, the state of New York, and Brazil investigating your finances and criminal charges brought against you?

r73 My point is that it's only a few days until your deadline ("next Friday at the latest"), and NOTHING is happening to get him removed from office by then.

R74, I'm not the poster you were responding to.

[quote]Filed paperwork to allow him to raise money for reelection Despite claiming he wouldn't run again

And this surprises who?

If one didn't know that the guy was lying when he said that he would never run again is only a reflection on you. This is why I feel that Santos will get away with this. Who cares about if he is running or not! Put the notice out that everyone is watching the money and who the donors are. Donors will donate at their own risk.

[quote] This is why I feel that Santos will get away with this.

So, R76, you think the NY State Attorney General, the District Attorney for Nassau County, the Queens District Attorney, the Federal Election Commission, the Justice Department, the House Ethics Committee, and Brazil are all going to let him slide? I think not.

^Until I see him taken away in handcuffs anything is possible

No, not all that is, R78. People here seem to think federal and state criminal investigations (especially regarding things like campaign finance fraud) should be handled within a month.

Musto is having fun with his tweets

He's an illiterate asshole.

(Santos, not Musto.)

R71, I'm not surprised he is trying to run again. Santos has learned from Trump and others that you can often run out the clock. It takes years for investigations to go anywhere and in the meantime these guys are able to get away with a lot of things.

Good point R82. If indictments/ convictions don’t get him, the voters in New York will. This Queens’ days are numbered.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't one of the reasons Trump 's in the running for POTUS again is precisely this? Both grifters want to use campaign funds to "legally" fund their defense and it's actually legal?

Isn't Santos required by the FEC to have a campaign treasurer before he can raise any money?

Has he actually found someone who's willing to admit to taking the job?

Trump is certainly counting on legions of outraged Deeplorables to shield and save him from the jaws of the law, which I hope grind him up into a greasy orange pulp before vomiting him all over the ground. Santos HAS NO supporters. How many votes does anyone believe the guy could reasonably count on in a future election? (The answer is close to ZERO).

[quote]No, not all that is, [R78]. People here seem to think federal and state criminal investigations (especially regarding things like campaign finance fraud) should be handled within a month.

Look I get you and I tend to be more like you. I tend to believe that good will triumph over evil and that right will win against wrong, but... these Republicans and today's current political environment are testing my core and fundamental values and beliefs! It is not as if evil and criminals have not walked away unscathed in this country before. Just refer to the Civil War and all those who got away without any consequences. Or the so many laws that have been written and passed to get someone off and avoid consequences. On and on...

State and federal investigations into Santos about his campaign finances are not controlled by Republicans and can't just be dismissed, R87. Not to mention in two years' time, he will be gone from office. He will never win a reelection bid. He is despised by both Reublicans and Democrats alike in his (mostly Democratic) district.

The latest

[quote] Not to mention in two years' time, he will be gone from office. He will never win a reelection bid. He is despised by both Reublicans and Democrats alike in his (mostly Democratic) district.

I'm old enough to recall similar things being said about George Wallace...

George Wallace had his fans. Santos doesn't.

R89 Imbeciles with that much money deserve Santos.

[quote]I'm old enough to recall similar things being said about George Wallace...

What'd I do??

R91 yes, George Wallace had more than fans, he had a base, white Southerners and white racist working class everywhere. So, he spoke for others, as reprehensible as that was. Santos is entirely a self serving grifter.

David Pakman discusses the NYT story on Santos brokering a yacht deal:

David Pakman discusses George Santos's credit card skimming operation:

[quote]I read the article in [R57] last night, same day that it was published. I think Santos is finished as a public figure. The article has the ring of truth and there are secondary witnesses who can back it up. I think Santos will be out of Congress within a week, by next Friday, at the latest. Faced with that kind of criminality, even the Republikunts will have to drive him out toot sweet. He's in serious legal trouble.

Would you like to re-think that prediction?

A house could fall on him. He's going to last at least through 2023

OK,OK!! Killing myself NOW!! -R66

Don't do that, r99. You'll miss the show.

Even Nostradamus missed some.

Here he reviews the new Space Force suit! Looks like he finally got a new sports jacket and too tight pants.

He must be loving all the current media distractions!

Those pants at r100 look cheap af.

Brazilian prosecutors agree to plea deal in bad-check case

[quote]"I am not a criminal here -- not here or in Brazil or any jurisdiction in the world. Absolutely not. That didn't happen," he said at the time.

This guy is a scumbag.

^ So now that he cut a deal where he admitted to stealing....can we throw him out?

McCarthy will come up with a different excuse. Remember, he said "he hasn't been convicted of anything, right?" when asked if they'd expel him.

Now he'll say some bullshit like, "he hasn't been convicted of anything in the United States, right?" They have no shame.

And another Friday goes by, R57 ....

[quote] Santos is now gainfully employed and "re-socialized."

Re-socialized as a lying sack of shit. Congress is increasingly a fucking clown show.

He should have been on MTG's field trip to the D.C. jail, but probably would have been too much of a distraction.

OH! Look at what "they" have found!

[quote]Curry served two tours in Afghanistan and was formerly a vice president at JP Morgan, according to his campaign bio.

Oh, big deal. I did three tours. And I was also VP at JP Morgan AND Bank of America. At the same time!

I want to see more videos of this sniveling little shit getting drummed out of the city yesterday.

I don't want to see him primaried and lose. I want to see him frogmarched right off the Capitol floor in handcuffs.

How about both, R113?

So, does anyone know if girlfriend, R110 is gay or straight? I'm thinking gay. This will be the fight of the QUEENS!

Gay bottom

(and there is NOTHING wrong with that!)

I'll take that, r114.

Surprise. Surprise...

Grifters be griftin' Not like he has many other options.

Ha!

He's in the red. Let's keep him there!

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Ahh, another feel good story. I love feel good stories.

R120 Love that Farron guy's meat paws.

More drama:

Indicted on federal charges!

R124, the charges will be unsealed tomorrow.

Delicious news. I’m stuffed just listening to it. McCarthy will ignore the charges/ indictments, UNTIL God willing, we get a conviction. Then it’s checkmate, motherfucker. Santos will be bounced, and a special election will be called.

Without Santos the speakership is back up for grabs.

How so, Google tells me 222 Republican, 213 Democrats in the House. The Republicans can afford to lose one. Are you claiming there will then be a Speaker challenge from within the Republican caucus, R127? ,

Yes R128 McCarthy only had a one vote margin when he was finally elected on the 15th ballot and the revised house rules allow for any single member to call for a new vote.

Which just goes to show, McCarthy wasn’t meant to be speaker. I hope his bowels are in twisted like a pretzel. Charges to be read tomorrow. Must see TV.

It would be an interesting development if the speakership of the house goes into disarray during the debt limit negotiation. It would certainly increase the grounds for Biden to invoke the 14th amendment.

I guess Kitara MUST be an American citizen to have been elected in the first place. Is he also a citizen of Brazil? Can't he just roll on out to the airport and leave all this trouble behind? He's obviously in bed with some bigtime Latino criminals, won't they payroll his escape? Wouldn't everyone be better off if he did? If he gets indicted does he HAVE to resign? So the Gov. there gets to appoint a Democratic successor to serve out the rest of his term? Sorry to be asking so many questions...

You have to a citizen but not born in the US to serve in Congress. Surprisingly (to no one) his birthplace (Queens or Brazil) is not clear and whether he has dual citizenship is also unclear. I am guessing if he is a US citizen his birthplace is the county and borough of Queens in the City of New York.

R132, he’s always been free to run away, but he loves the spotlight. He’s living his dream. The criminals he may be involved with are likely Russian. He does not have to resign if indicted; he has to be removed by the House. I think there would be a special election if that happened, but am too lazy to confirm that.

^Now that he is facing very credible threats of incarceration, he obviously has a real incentive to flee the country. -R132

R135, it may be that he has stayed in office so that he can offer to resign following an indictment. His job is his bargaining chip.

If the Feds have him on a provable financial crime, they likely won't let him just walk off.

So, Santos pled "not guilty"

BUT

Who are the THREE (3) people who put up his $500K bond???

Oooooh, yum, so manly.

Oh, Georgie

The fat lady sings!

She's had enough and therefore she's outta here!

Stinky link

Try this one

His spokesperson has resigned.

“Unfortunately, you never took one point of professional advice given.”

Hope everyone who works for him resigns

It does not look good on your resume to say you worked for this cunt.

[quote]Hope everyone who works for him resigns

It's my hope that everyone who worked for him is unemployable. Remember, they applied for these positions after he won his election. They weren't assigned.

Jumping ship!

I'm pleading insanity, I suffer from Multiple Personality Disorder that was triggered by my mom's tragic death on Sept. 11

Still lying

LOL!

Regrets? Or, revealing?

Did a Chinese billionaire fund Santos' bail?

No mystery bond provider is going to keep this cunt from prison.

Will shady Chinese and Russia guys pay for his lawyers, too?

Begs the court not to reveal who paid his bail

HA! Fatty loses!

It will be DELICIOUS if it comes out that this was the group that put up the money!

It would take a lot of those basic bitches to raise $500k, R159. I think it's some kind of dark money donor(s) or Russians.

But these are not basic bitches. It's China and that very rich Chinese guy (who is in jail right now) that backs (or have backed) Steve Bannon and numerous misinformation websites and other outlets.

Well, whoever it is, we'll find out.

It's getting hot in here...

Why do they keep moving the goalposts? He failed to meet the deadline, said he rather go to jail. Do him like you'd do anyone not wearing an AR15 pin and sitting in Congress.

They had until Monday. Now, they have until Friday. Not really a flash. Wake us up when something happens.

Good, however he'll wait until 11:59am on Friday then appeal hence dragging this out further. Ridiculous.

George Santos is about to lose that bail money. He's not going to win appeal. Even Congress has asked for the names to disclosed. Not just media. George Santos is going to jail. When Friday arrives, there will be the zero dollars of $500,000 bail for George Santos.

It’s become too easy to play dodgeball with our legal system for people in power.

R167 Nice fantasy.

Not a fantasy at all, R167. You think they're going to cowtow around THIS asshole? Let him appeal at the last minute, he will lose the appeal. And eventually he will do jail time. He's a nothing in the scheme of things.

At the end of the day, if he appeals at the last minute, he will lose the appeal. Then he will renege on his promise to willingly go to jail and the names will be published.

R168 And the media dramatically report on every move for clicks. Having the situation reach an actual conclusion is bad for business.

I’ll believe it when I see it.

Drudge loves posting unflattering photos of George.

In every photo he looks like a hysterical queen surprised first thing in the morning.

As for delaying anything by the appeal, not really. He will appeal by Friday, and they will uphold the original judge's decision on Monday.

Pretending to be offended by the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence

[quote]It’s become too easy to play dodgeball with our legal system for people in power.

Agreed. Why does the legal system allow people to run out the clock? Trump has been doing it for years.

R176 Oh come ON! Lying through his fake teeth!

He’s got serious psych problems. Not the type that inspire any sympathy.

And, oh, yes… he’s pathetic.

Look at the photo he chose for his Twitter avatar! Says it all.

He's now claiming "family members" put up his bail.

[quote]He's now claiming "family members" put up his bail.

And where did they get the money from?

To be fair the full wording was organized crime family; family is just shorthand.

Is he dead yet?

He gives me the creeps.

Yeah… he has a serial killer’s gaze.

When will the bail polls be outed? I know he appealed, but when the NYT sues, they tend to succeed.

^^^ bail contributors be outed?

It was unsecured so they neither had to put out $500k or put up any collateral. by what I’ve read, it sounds like it would cost 15% or $75k.

He's so concerned about protecting integrity, doncha know

Judge will reveal who paid his bond.

Wanna place bets? I'm voting for shady Russian and Chinese oligarchs

Where did his retired construction worker/house painter father and his aunt get the money to bail Kitara out, hmmmmm?

^ What Russian oligarch gave them the money?

I don't think Russian oligarchs are bthering to fund or bail out some queen grifter running for a House seat from NYC. I think the grift is coming from the inside.

I was listening to the author who is writing a book about Santos, called The Fabulist.

He said George and dad had a strained relationship. Once when George was moving in with a roommate, George’s father warned the roommate about his son.

[quote]He said George and dad had a strained relationship. Once when George was moving in with a roommate, George’s father warned the roommate about his son

And yet the father puts up bail money?

Nuh-Uh....

There's more to this and Santos is right. The investigative press needs to get to work on this!

[quote]His bond was guaranteed by Gercino dos Santos Jr. and Elma Santos Preven, who Santos first told ABC News' Rachel Scott are his father and his aunt.

Okay. Let's get to work!

R198, he is living in denial. If so much of the reporting is untrue, as he claims, why didn't he sue or publicly debunk those claims?

Compares himself to Rosa Parks

He raised TOO MUCH money, IMHO...

George Santos’ campaign paid him $85,000 this quarter

The payments were designed to pay the congress member back for loans he previously made to his campaign.

The campaign of embattled Rep. George Santos, who is facing federal indictment on fraud and money laundering charges, paid the congressmember $85,000 in the second quarter of this year.

Though the New York representative says he is running for reelection, he spent virtually nothing on campaigning.

The payments the campaign made to Santos stemmed from hundreds of thousands of dollars that the congressmember previously loaned to his campaign. Those loans had sparked questions about how Santos had so much money to lend his political efforts. Previous reports with the Federal Election Commission indicated Santos had loaned the campaign $715,000, although his latest report indicated he was now owed only $530,000.

The loan repayments accounted for more than 60 percent of the $133,000 that Santos reported raising in the second quarter. The first-term congressmember, who lied about much of his biography prior to his election last year, reported having $55,000 cash on hand in his principal campaign committee.

His fundraising was driven primarily by donors who gave the maximum $3,300, his filing shows. Among those who maxed out to the congressmember included individuals who listed their professions as “student” and “housewife” and “parttime job/casher (sic).”

The latest filing with the federal commission also included an unusual note stating that the campaign intended to report accurate totals based on “incomplete” historical data.

Santos’ campaign previously lost money during the first quarter, as refunds issued exceeded new contributions received. Nonetheless, the beleaguered New York congressmember announced in April that he planned to seek reelection.

He was indicted in May on charges including wire fraud and theft of public funds. Prosecutors allege he asked a New York political consultant to solicit donations ostensibly in support of his congressional campaign that were actually transferred to his personal bank accounts.

Santos also allegedly received unemployment benefits in 2020 despite holding a job, and is accused of making false statements on mandatory personal financial disclosures filed during his first congressional campaign.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has not called on Santos to resign in light of the charges but said he should not run for reelection.

Filings earlier this week indicated Santos was in the process of terminating at least two joint fundraising committees that brought in money for his campaign last cycle.

His fundraising this quarter foretells a difficult path to reelection — particularly as he faces challengers from both parties. Kellen Curry, who has filed to run in the Long Island district as a Republican, said earlier in the week that he had raised more than $200,000 across his campaign and a leadership PAC from April through June.

Half a dozen Democrats have also filed to run against Santos, with the party seeing a possible pickup opportunity in a district Biden won in 2020.

So....

The Santos campaign (and Republicans) all knew a year before the election about the lies and Georgie refused to drop out of the race.

He’ll be tossed out on his fat ass in a little more than a year.

Fat Girl (Naysa Woomer--former Santos Press Secretary) was interviewed on Ari Melber tonight. Me thinks that she can't get a job and went on the program in attempts of clearing her name.

Well, he's quick with retorts...

Jamie Raskin @jamie_raskin 1h

Waiting for the vote and I reminded Jared Moskowitz that there was never so much chaos in the House when George Santos was Speaker.

Jared went over to Santos to tell him that and Santos said, “That’s why I don’t want to be Speaker again.”

Guuurl...

Mary is going to Jail!

Here's the full indictment from the Eastern District of New York:

Buh, bye.

And of course it failed to expel him.

SMH.

I don't know, R210. I agree with the decision. While I want Santos out, he is innocent until proven guilty. The best way (IMHO) to get rid of him on his own is to put pressure on anyone that donates to his campaign. If there is no money, there isn't much that he can do to get re-elected and hopefully he will be voted out. However, once there is a guilty conviction, and if he is still in office, then it's time to revisit expulsion.