Anti-Gay church minister charged w/ underage male sex - Part II

Original thread:

Other image of Mr. Singer:

Another image:

Yet another image:

[quote] In his video, former Harvest volunteer James Engleman alleges that I received “screenshots of all of the sexting text messages that had gone back and forth between Paxton Singer” and boys Singer allegedly was “sexually exploiting.”

[quote] According to Engleman, the text messages said things like, “Do you get erections when you wrestle other boys? Do you want to meet me at a hotel tonight? Can you send me a picture of yourself in your underwear?”

Homecoming king and queen;

He's not ugly for a pedo.

How old was this "victim"?

Whorraaayyyy! Now that he's a free man and his "victim" is legal, he and the boy can be together for ever, and have sleepovers, and giggle all night, and eat gummy bears, and have tickle fights, and model tighty-whities for each other, and READ THE BIBLE TO EACH OTHER, except using a "sexy GODLY voice"!

PRAISE JEEBSUS!!!

He looks good!!

Preach to me daddy

If only my priest had been that hot!

This is perhaps wrong to say, but he's exactly the type of guy I was dying to experiment with as a horny, lonely teen in my fundamentalist home state.

I cannot parse what's going on in those appeals and acquittals and shit in the first post. Can someone diagram it for me?

This case must surely be a case of mistaken identity. This is a man of God!

I think the article is missing some facts, but here's what seems to be the unlikely case.

1. He was convicted.

2. He requested a new trial, and it seems the trial judge agreed thinking that there should be more evidence. So the trial judge acquitted him (this is the key), and ordered a new trial.

3. His attorneys then objected to the new trial, claiming double jeopardy, i.e., he had already been on trial for which he was acquitted by the trial judge. The trial judge refused.

4. His attorneys appealed, and the appellate court decided that (1) there was sufficient evidence to convict him; but (2) it didn't matter, because the trial judge acquitted him when ordering the new trial.

It seems like a shockingly stupid trial judge didn't know that acquit someone of criminal charges and then order a new trial on those same criminal charges.

*It seems like a shockingly stupid trial judge didn't know that he couldn't just acquit someone of criminal charges and then order a new trial on those same criminal charges.

God must have been on his side, R16.

He's gorgeous!!!!!

He's good looking

R12 You're an obsessive pedo. Give it a rest. It was funny the first time.

Good, handsome gay men should be free!

He looks like a cute gym coach I had a crush on when I was in 9th grade, he always caught me eyeballing him, he looked very sexy in his Grey sweat pants, RHS athletics t-shirt and a whistle hanging around his neck. I was longing to blow his whistle, and I think he was fully aware of it...

I know a youth pastor at Harmony Bible Church who abused an underage male teen in his youth group. He led youth camps. People still didn't want to believe it, even though there were text messages. Those church members tend to be smug and arrogant and really don't give a shit. They only care about rooking people into their church. Sure, they lie to get to their goals, but hey, Jesus would have wanted it.

He would have been a dream come true for me as a horny teen

Where's Del Shores when you need him? This story cries out to be told!

So I guess now he can go back to being Youth Pastor? Xtianity in the US is really, really hilarious.

It's not just the U.S. Look at the Catholic Church the world over just moving around child abusers to other parishes...

Well, someone has quite the crush OP!

[quote] 2. He requested a new trial, and it seems the trial judge agreed thinking that there should be more evidence. So the trial judge acquitted him (this is the key), and ordered a new trial.

Yeah, that trial judge sounds like an idiot. It sounded like a misdemeanor conviction, 12 months or probation. He'll get into more trouble in the future, I'm guessing. His neck is unusually long.

What age was the victim?

Maybe, oh, I don’t know, read the thread to find out, you fucking simpleton.

Which post references the victim's age?

It was in the first thread.

The accusers were 16 and 17 years old and the perp was 24 at the time of commission.

Has he learned the difference between good touching and bad touching now?

Sad to say I’d have been thrilled to have him fondle me when I was 16-17.

Are you self loathing?

[...]

These are the people who want to decide everything for us. Even whether we live or die. They are boldly establishing a theocracy, state by state. If you are gay, make no mistake, these Evangelicals are not your friends.

He asked for a new trial which should waive any double jeopardy claim. The judge granted that but also entered a judgement of acquittal in the first trial. Is that it? If so, it seems like an technical error which the appellate court should have remanded for clarification?

Sugar Grove?

Sugar SHACK!

The Evangelical "Christians" want to suppress Islamists, yet they want what the radical Islamists have - complete control over women, gays, and everyone else they hate, through laws. They established penal laws in Ireland and England, and they want them here. U.S. "Christians" are a thing to be feared. They won't stop because they mistakenly believe they are speaking for God.

Any Church that has a "Youth Minister" is telling the world, "we employ pedophiles."

He’s a looker. Is he getting his old job back? He can just blame his actions on Demons and pick up where he left off.

Christians love that their leaders are sexual predators who rape their children.

They love it. It's some kind of perverse excitement akin to playing Russian roulette.

I have a coworker who sent her kids to Catholic school and told her son to tell her immediately if a priest ever molests or rapes him. She was serious. She worried about it constantly. I asked her many times why she would pay to send her kids to a school where she believed the teachers or administrators would rape her children. She said it's a good education. I honestly believe she was hoping one of the kids would be assaulted so that she could get off on the guilt and trauma. And if it happened, she would blame only the individial priest and keep giving her money to the church that has made raping children their industrial practice.

Sick.

Christians are sick in the head.

And they accuse Muslims of worshiping a pedophile - when pedophilia is at the very core of their own religion.

R44 Or start onlyfans.

r13 r25 WHORES!!!

Does he have “an” Onlyfans?