The Rachel Maddow Show On MSNBC: Official Appreciation Thread
|by Anonymous||reply 137||Last Saturday at 8:05 AM|
I lost interest after Mueller.
|by Anonymous||reply 1||04/30/2021|
All she does is read legal documents on screen, punctuating the reading with, "I'm not a lawyer." Dumb, tiresome, overrated.
|by Anonymous||reply 2||04/30/2021|
Must you people shit on everything and everyone? Love Rachel...
|by Anonymous||reply 3||04/30/2021|
I use to love her show. But feel she could use a long break. Her and Susan should take some of their millions and do some fun stuff (travel, fishing, philanthropy, etc). Something they both enjoy doing. I could see Rachel has a wonderful professor or writing books.
She lost her spark at some point during the Trump presidency. Someone mentioned Mueller and I kinda agree. Not that I blame her, that four years were a living nightmare
|by Anonymous||reply 4||04/30/2021|
R4 She has the top rated show on cable, constantly beating Hannity. She won't stop now.
|by Anonymous||reply 5||04/30/2021|
NO! Fuck that cunt! She's part of the reason Hillary lost and we got trump! Fuck her! Hope she gets cancer!
|by Anonymous||reply 6||04/30/2021|
Rachel Maddow hair truthers!
|by Anonymous||reply 7||04/30/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 8||04/30/2021|
That looks like the famous blue/black vs. white/gold dress
|by Anonymous||reply 9||04/30/2021|
R19 Yep, that's what she was making fun of.
|by Anonymous||reply 10||04/30/2021|
Maddow = Monotonous.
|by Anonymous||reply 11||04/30/2021|
She's got one of the top rated shows on cable right now. Ain't going anywhere.
|by Anonymous||reply 12||04/30/2021|
It's great to have someone on tv who represents people like me.
|by Anonymous||reply 13||04/30/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 14||05/01/2021|
[quote] use to love her show. But feel she could use a long break. Her and Susan should take some of their millions and do some fun stuff (travel, fishing, philanthropy, etc). Something they both enjoy doing. I could see Rachel has a wonderful professor or writing books. She lost her spark at some point during the Trump presidency. Someone mentioned Mueller and I kinda agree. Not that I blame her, that four years were a living nightmare
Rachel takes plenty of time off. Her show has not changed. She’s still covering important news. Whether you’re actually interested in the news is a different story. It sounds like that you are not.
|by Anonymous||reply 15||05/01/2021|
R15 She used to do fun and funny things at the end, like "The Best New Thing In The World" and "Moment Of Geek".
|by Anonymous||reply 16||05/01/2021|
I like Rachel, but what has she got against wearing any color but black? She does tend to chortle at times though, but I'm usually in agreement with what's she doing so about.
|by Anonymous||reply 17||05/01/2021|
R17 She used to wear grey and off white blazers early on.
|by Anonymous||reply 18||05/01/2021|
I have no criticisms of her. I think what she's doing is great, and we need to see more of it.
She's been my go-to for political and world news for the past decade or so. I'm really impressed with her.
|by Anonymous||reply 19||05/01/2021|
I also like when she talks to Lawrence O'Donnell at the conclusion of her show and the beginning of his. He's actually rather good-looking, and sometimes I think I enjoy his show just as much, maybe more for some DILF eye candy.
|by Anonymous||reply 20||05/01/2021|
R20 Her banter with Chris and Lawrence is always a treat.
|by Anonymous||reply 21||05/01/2021|
But no one banters with Brian Williams at all. Why is that?
|by Anonymous||reply 22||05/01/2021|
[quote] [R15] She used to do fun and funny things at the end, like "The Best New Thing In The World" and "Moment Of Geek".
You’re talking about 2 minutes of the show.
|by Anonymous||reply 23||05/01/2021|
R23 I know, I'm just saying. I love her.
|by Anonymous||reply 24||05/01/2021|
This was funny.
|by Anonymous||reply 25||05/01/2021|
You’re probably right r15 I’m terribly weary of all news show (except local news for weather and local stuff)
I’m burnt out from the past 4 years with the orange menace and Covid
|by Anonymous||reply 26||05/01/2021|
R26 Has Rachel ever been bleeped?
|by Anonymous||reply 27||05/01/2021|
I know I had enough of her when she bullied baby Pete on her show in 2019. Fuck that bitch.
|by Anonymous||reply 28||05/01/2021|
Saw her once passing through Rock Center (in the Before Times). She's tiny, like 5'2". Completely grunged down outfit, nearly didn't see her.
|by Anonymous||reply 29||05/01/2021|
[quote]Has Rachel ever been bleeped?
Not legitimately, no, R27. It was a technical issue.
|by Anonymous||reply 30||05/01/2021|
R29 Ha, she's 5'11
|by Anonymous||reply 31||05/01/2021|
[quote][R29] Ha, she's 5'11
She is?? Could have sworn it was her. Perhaps not then.
|by Anonymous||reply 32||05/01/2021|
R30 She was because she said "Shit" in a pretax while talking with crazy Birchers. And she was bleeped for taking the Lord's name in vain on Fallon's show, before it became okay to do so.
|by Anonymous||reply 33||05/01/2021|
She should wear red once in a while. It wouldn’t kill her.
|by Anonymous||reply 34||05/01/2021|
I’m the excessive blinking.
|by Anonymous||reply 35||05/01/2021|
Yeah R32, you saw a midget Maddow lookalike lol. Rachel Maddow is very tall!
|by Anonymous||reply 36||05/01/2021|
I love her squinty eyes.
|by Anonymous||reply 37||05/01/2021|
Rachel always has her eyes on something other media have not yet paid attention to, like the Flint water crisis, a dam in California which had impending collapse last year, the Puerto Rican hurricane response. She's ahead of the game. That's why I watch her.
|by Anonymous||reply 38||05/01/2021|
I would love it if Rachel did a wig reveal towards the end of her show one night.
|by Anonymous||reply 39||05/01/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 40||05/01/2021|
She should do one night in a super-fluffy, garish prom dress with a fake bouffant piled 3 feet high. No explanation. Then go back to her pantsuits the next night with no explanation.
|by Anonymous||reply 41||05/01/2021|
R41 Send your ideas to Cory!
|by Anonymous||reply 42||05/01/2021|
Right behind Tucker.
|by Anonymous||reply 43||05/02/2021|
[quote] I know I had enough of her when she bullied baby Pete on her show in 2019. Fuck that bitch.
I don’t recall Rachel inviting infants on. Does anyone else recall that?
|by Anonymous||reply 44||05/03/2021|
I think she needs a long time off, like a month or two.
|by Anonymous||reply 45||05/03/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 46||05/03/2021|
Who's had Lawrence?
|by Anonymous||reply 47||05/03/2021|
Rachel is not in 30 Rock, she is broadcasting from a remote studio.
|by Anonymous||reply 48||05/03/2021|
Kerry Washington, R47.
|by Anonymous||reply 49||05/03/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 50||05/04/2021|
She once said that she is a lesbian who sometimes enjoys a nice cock.......
|by Anonymous||reply 51||05/04/2021|
R51 Ha, I wish. I highly doubt that.
|by Anonymous||reply 52||05/04/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 53||05/04/2021|
Maddowblog just posted this pic on Twitter.
It makes me giggle like a schoolgirl.
|by Anonymous||reply 54||05/04/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 55||05/04/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 56||05/05/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 57||05/05/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 58||05/06/2021|
Coming up in 10.
|by Anonymous||reply 59||05/07/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 60||05/14/2021|
Rachel's got a rogue hair sticking out.
|by Anonymous||reply 61||05/24/2021|
[quote]Yep, that's what she was making fun of.
In a then-$2,000 McQueen.
|by Anonymous||reply 62||05/24/2021|
That's a man, baby!
|by Anonymous||reply 63||05/24/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 64||06/20/2021|
Has she stood up for LGB and women yet against the trans industry or is she just another corporatist stooge?
|by Anonymous||reply 65||06/20/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 66||06/21/2021|
Damn Rachel loves running down rabbit holes.
|by Anonymous||reply 67||06/22/2021|
She sucks & not in a good way. She's a sell=out troll of the highest proportions.
|by Anonymous||reply 68||06/22/2021|
Rachel amditted to wearing a wig tonight.
|by Anonymous||reply 69||06/22/2021|
Coming up in an hour.
|by Anonymous||reply 70||06/23/2021|
Great A Block tonight.
|by Anonymous||reply 71||06/24/2021|
Is she still in her lesbian phase?
|by Anonymous||reply 72||06/24/2021|
I don’t like her.
|by Anonymous||reply 73||06/24/2021|
What a slug.
|by Anonymous||reply 74||06/24/2021|
Great show tonight.
|by Anonymous||reply 75||06/25/2021|
Even CDAN is in on the Maddow wig truthing.
|by Anonymous||reply 76||06/25/2021|
Wearing a wig makes sense. If you are working down to the wire, you do anything you can to save time
|by Anonymous||reply 77||06/26/2021|
People who rely on CNN or MSNBC personalities like Maddow to get their news are no better than deplorables who are glued to Fox News. Are you all shut-ins or laid up in a hospital? Why do you watch this dreck?
|by Anonymous||reply 78||06/26/2021|
People don't watch Maddow to "get their news."
They watch to get her take on the news.
People watch (and read) the news itself to get their news.
|by Anonymous||reply 79||06/26/2021|
Once in awhile she's on target with a novel point, but I find her usual monologuing to be tediousand unwatchable.
|by Anonymous||reply 80||06/26/2021|
Rachel went fishing today.
|by Anonymous||reply 81||06/26/2021|
Lesley Stahl is the wig queen. Not Rachel.
|by Anonymous||reply 82||06/26/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 83||07/02/2021|
I want to like her - she's smart and well-prepared. However, her introductions to news stories are longer than the story itself. GET TO THE POINT!
|by Anonymous||reply 84||07/02/2021|
R84. Those are her A-block "essays" and they're her signature. You might as well not watch because they're the reason most people watch. Also, if you're watching her for "news stories," you're in the wrong place; she has always done long-form commentary.
|by Anonymous||reply 85||07/02/2021|
R85 Yeah, her A-Blocks are her trademarks.
|by Anonymous||reply 86||07/03/2021|
I would not have survived the past 4 years without her. She can zero in on Dump issues far in advance. I guess she has good story editors.
But does she eat fish?
|by Anonymous||reply 87||07/03/2021|
She wears a wig?
|by Anonymous||reply 88||07/03/2021|
Appreciation thread???...FOR WHAT?
Doesn't deserve one, ffs!
He OWN lawyers admit the idiots who watch her show should know what she presents isn't news.
|by Anonymous||reply 89||07/03/2021|
Rachel's hair look fantastic tonight.
|by Anonymous||reply 90||07/06/2021|
What r85 said. I love how she puts her show together. You get some background, you wonder where she's headed and boom. Plus, best hair on television...no matter what tertiary syphilis sufferer 40 Days/Nights says.
|by Anonymous||reply 91||07/06/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 92||07/07/2021|
She's got breaking news about the Haitian President. I'll bet she had to throw out her planned show.
|by Anonymous||reply 93||07/07/2021|
R93 Doubt it, as the news broke around 3:30 today.
|by Anonymous||reply 94||07/07/2021|
WOW! She’s really sounding pissed off just now. Keep it together, Rachel…yes, life in the US is really fucked up right now.
|by Anonymous||reply 95||07/07/2021|
I am as far left as you get but I find her absolutely insufferable. Even when I agree with her I wince at how smug, predictable, long-winded, and phony. she is. It amazes me how many people hang on her every word. Truly a mystery, though I acknowledge I'm in the minority!
|by Anonymous||reply 96||07/07/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 97||07/09/2021|
He’s a very dapper looking young man.
|by Anonymous||reply 98||07/09/2021|
1. Is that the "what color is this dress?" meme dress?
2. Rachel's been working in one of MSNBC's tiny "news nooks" during the pandemic. These studios are just big enough to hold Rachel, her desk, LCD monitors as a backdrop, and a single robotic camera. It must be a lonesome gig these days.
3. DL's dippy far-right trolls love to take potshots at a personable PhD. who has them by 50+ IQ points. Fuck them, (and do feel free to check out high school graduate Sean Hannity.)
|by Anonymous||reply 99||07/09/2021|
R99 Why isn't she back at her regular studio?
|by Anonymous||reply 100||07/09/2021|
Studio 3A, MSNBC's main studio at 30 Rock has been completely deconstructed, R100.
|by Anonymous||reply 101||07/10/2021|
R101 Ah, thanks!
|by Anonymous||reply 102||07/10/2021|
I want to throw her down and force her to accessorize.
|by Anonymous||reply 103||07/10/2021|
She is a handsome woman - accessories would look odd on her
|by Anonymous||reply 104||07/10/2021|
Any reference to Jimmy Dore = autoblock.
|by Anonymous||reply 105||07/10/2021|
It's Maddow time.
|by Anonymous||reply 106||07/12/2021|
Maddow has the pulse of the Progressives.
|by Anonymous||reply 107||07/12/2021|
Every time Brian Williams says "Hook'em Horns", I just want to kick him in the cunt.
|by Anonymous||reply 108||07/12/2021|
Maddow needs to go on the offense to direct our feckless Dems. Dems should stage protests in Texas, Georgia, Arizona, etc. and get live news coverage. Talking heads on CNN is not going to cut it.
|by Anonymous||reply 109||07/12/2021|
Viewers expect her to do so, as it is indeed her show, and viewers watch the segment with the understanding that it will contain Maddow’s “personal and subjective views” about the news. See id. Thus, the Court finds that as a part of the totality of the circumstances, the broad context weighs in favor of a finding that the alleged defamatory statement is Maddow’s opinion and exaggeration of the Daily Beast article, and that reasonable viewers would not take the statement as factual. . . .
Here, Maddow had inserted her own colorful commentary into and throughout the segment, laughing, expressing her dismay (i.e., saying “I mean, what?”) and calling the segment a “sparkly story” and one we must “take in stride.” For her to exaggerate the facts and call OAN Russian propaganda was consistent with her tone up to that point, and the Court finds a reasonable viewer would not take the statement as factual given this context. The context of Maddow’s statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be her opinion. A reasonable viewer would not actually think OAN is paid Russian propaganda, instead, he or she would follow the facts of the Daily Beast article; that OAN and Sputnik share a reporter and both pay this reporter to write articles. Anything beyond this is Maddow’s opinion or her exaggeration of the facts.
|by Anonymous||reply 110||07/12/2021|
Here's a peek inside a MSNBC 'news nook' mini studio, in use while the main studio is being rebuilt. It's cozy, about bedroom-sized.
|by Anonymous||reply 111||07/15/2021|
R110, one man's BS is another man's "salesman's puff" (and does not constitute actionable defamation), which was the subject of the lawsuit.
|by Anonymous||reply 112||07/15/2021|
R110 Take that POS website/ "news" page and GTFO. Tucker Carlson is a racist , pencil dicked butt weasel and slobbering douche bag. Rachel is a Rhodes scholar and Stanford grad. This thread is sick and full of Republican trolls -No way! Trump is NOT going back to the WH -not unless he's wearing an orange jump suit and handcuffs with an extra supply of Donnie diapers.
|by Anonymous||reply 113||07/15/2021|
Yes, Rachel is way smarter which is why Tucker used the Maddow defense in his case.
Maybe they are all the same and are just playing "good cop, bad cop" on us.
|by Anonymous||reply 114||07/15/2021|
I can not say if it’s due to Rachel, but Holy Smokers! People are pissed off and them gloves are freaking coming off now. Amen sisters and brothers.
|by Anonymous||reply 115||07/16/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 116||07/19/2021|
Love Rachel but that gold and white dress does not suit her. Washes her out.
|by Anonymous||reply 117||07/19/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 118||07/20/2021|
Russia! Russia terrible! Russia destroy America!! More Russia people! It's all Russia! AAeeeoooowww Russia ! That's all folks!
I don't get my news from Comcast and their corporate shills.
|by Anonymous||reply 119||07/20/2021|
Russia was brought up by the hournakist. It appears you ^^^ get your news drum Trumo, who denied Russian invlvemwnt, who opened up US technology to Russian makwsre. Trump obstructed every investigation that would have exposed him as a prepurchased MULTIPLE state foreign agent.
|by Anonymous||reply 120||07/20/2021|
|by Anonymous||reply 121||07/20/2021|
Don't make me come to St. Petersburg to kick your sorry ass, R119.
|by Anonymous||reply 122||Last Wednesday at 12:36 PM|
You couldn't kick your way out of a pair of pants R122. Try reading non mainstream news sources who actually know Russia like Masha Gessen , instead of extravagantly-paid Comcast employees.
|by Anonymous||reply 123||Last Wednesday at 1:12 PM|
|by Anonymous||reply 124||Last Wednesday at 5:56 PM|
[quote]I don't get my news from Comcast and their corporate shills.
Cool. So what does Putin's dick taste like?
[quote]In political jargon, a useful idiot is a derogatory term for a person perceived as propagandizing for a cause without fully comprehending the cause's goals, and who is cynically used by the cause's leaders. The term was originally used during the Cold War to describe non-communists regarded as susceptible to communist propaganda and manipulation. The term has often been attributed to Vladimir Lenin, but this attribution is unsubstantiated.
|by Anonymous||reply 125||Last Wednesday at 6:02 PM|
R125 I'm not going to argue with you because you are stupid.
|by Anonymous||reply 126||Last Thursday at 6:02 AM|
|by Anonymous||reply 127||Last Thursday at 11:42 PM|
R15 Its how the drippy dyke presents the news It's more snooze than news with her.
|by Anonymous||reply 128||Last Thursday at 11:46 PM|
I love Rachel and am happy she’s on air.
She also happens to have the best talking heads on her show & she knows how to make really boring, monotonous, yet important information a tad more palatable than most.
She’s fighting the good fight.
Also, Rachel should consider dying her hair a flaming red to mix it up a bit! 🧑🏻🦰
|by Anonymous||reply 129||Last Thursday at 11:54 PM|
Live from her tiny studio, it's Maddow time.
|by Anonymous||reply 130||Last Friday at 5:02 PM|
LIVE on a FRIDAY!
|by Anonymous||reply 131||Last Friday at 5:07 PM|
Rachel's wig looks perfect tonight.
|by Anonymous||reply 132||Last Friday at 5:21 PM|
She just said that various legal actions may have been "squashed". That's a Nicolle Wallace level mistake and I expect better from Rachel Maddow (the Rhodes scholar)!
|by Anonymous||reply 133||Last Friday at 5:22 PM|
How many times does Rachel have to announce that she is not a lawyer? Either word is OK.
|by Anonymous||reply 134||Last Friday at 7:38 PM|
No, R134. Bugs are squashed, subpoena are quashed. Actually, since she was talking about lawsuits that weren't allowed to proceed, the correct term is "dismissed".
|by Anonymous||reply 135||Last Saturday at 4:55 AM|
Joy should lend Rachel a few of her wigs.
|by Anonymous||reply 136||Last Saturday at 6:52 AM|
r135, you are an unwanted technocunt and latches to you.
|by Anonymous||reply 137||Last Saturday at 8:05 AM|