Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Gay man becomes one of the first in UK to become single father through surrogacy

Heartwarming story for any other single gay men out there. Link in R1.

by Anonymousreply 5002/19/2021


Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 101/31/2021

Heartwarming? Can we dispel with the false assumption one needs children to have a happy and fulfilling life?

by Anonymousreply 201/31/2021

You don't NEED them, but if you want one... they can bring joy... at least that's what I'm told.

So good for him.

by Anonymousreply 301/31/2021

I’m not going to congratulate anyone who goes to the trouble and expense to bring an additional human life into existence when there are already millions not being cared for. The practice is selfish and narcissistic and should be shamed.

by Anonymousreply 401/31/2021

Radfems and lesbian are to take over this thread to call gay men misogynistic child harvesters in 3, 2, 1...

by Anonymousreply 501/31/2021

[quote] I’m not going to congratulate anyone who goes to the trouble and expense to bring an additional human life into existence when there are already millions not being cared for. The practice is selfish and narcissistic and should be shamed.

I agree. It’s time to sterilize all ciswomen.

by Anonymousreply 601/31/2021

Heartwarming is not the word I would use. Selfish is more accurate.

by Anonymousreply 701/31/2021

There are all sort of ethical issues with surrogacy, which I won't get into. The biggie is that humanity doesn't need tyour spawn, it needs someone to take care of all the children who are already here!

And that applies to straights, too, if I could outlaw infertility treatment I would. Too much breeding going on.

by Anonymousreply 801/31/2021

People that do this are the same type that get purebred dogs from puppy mill breeders when there are perfectly wonderful mutts in need of loving homes.

Plus that guy is FUGLY. He shouldn't want a child that could have any chance of looking like him.

by Anonymousreply 901/31/2021

R9 Beautiful people don't necessarily birth beautiful people. Look around sometimes.

by Anonymousreply 1001/31/2021

That baby has huge feet.

by Anonymousreply 1101/31/2021

Agree with most of the posters. So many orphaned kids need parents and homes, and all this creep can think about it having a child who looks like him. This should hot be legal.

by Anonymousreply 1201/31/2021

R12 Fuck off, dyke. As if dyķ weren't constantly buying cum to get pregnant the unnatural way.

by Anonymousreply 1301/31/2021

This is is the "first" in the UK? Really? It's fairly common in most of the world.

Also, OP, why did you have to post the link in R1 instead of your OP post?

by Anonymousreply 1401/31/2021

[quote] Beautiful people don't necessarily birth beautiful people.

Yeah, but ugly people definitely don't. With attractive people, at least you have a shot.

by Anonymousreply 1501/31/2021

I commend him, and wish I were young enough to do the same.

by Anonymousreply 1601/31/2021

True R10 but when was the last time you looked around and saw someone beautiful born from ugly parents?

by Anonymousreply 1701/31/2021

There is no legal age limit, R16.

by Anonymousreply 1801/31/2021

r18, I'm 62 and single. I can hardly stay awake past 10 p.m.

by Anonymousreply 1901/31/2021

[quote] Also, OP, why did you have to post the link in [R1] instead of your OP post?

Datalounge hasn’t been letting start threads with links in them the past week or so.

Anyone else having a problem?

by Anonymousreply 2001/31/2021

If you were a narcissist r19, you’d buy your crotchfruit as well as a codependent boyfriend.

When you’re dead, the kid is his problem.

by Anonymousreply 2101/31/2021

Bald. I might’ve known he’d be bald.

by Anonymousreply 2201/31/2021

You knew he’d be bald? Why?

by Anonymousreply 2301/31/2021

It seems a pregnant surrogate is the ultimate status symbol for gay men these days. I know a single dad and a married couple who have three kids each through surrogacy.

by Anonymousreply 2401/31/2021

Surrogacy is sexual slavery. The people who purchase women’s bodies to trade in human trafficking should be rotting in prison. And separating an infant from his or her mother causes traumatic brain damage, regardless of the circumstances.

by Anonymousreply 2501/31/2021

Homophobic rad fem at R25.

by Anonymousreply 2601/31/2021

[quote]You knew he’d be bald? Why?

The baby is bald. Genes.

by Anonymousreply 2702/01/2021

Having a psycho birth mother who raises her own child and there are plenty of them causes just as much traumatic brain damage.

by Anonymousreply 2802/01/2021

Yep. I generally don't believe breeders should be parents. The number of gay boys who've been left scarred by homophobic parents is proof of that.

by Anonymousreply 2902/01/2021

Some of R25's posting history:

Transgenderism: A New Operating System for Patriarchy

[QUOTE] The only explanation that makes sense is that transgenderism is providing new tools to implement patriarchy, filling in the cracks in the system left by the work of feminists. The majority of people, at least in the United States where research has been conducted, do not believe in or want transgender ideology. Professions and organizations do implement it, nonetheless, their raison d’etre is to promote patriarchy.

Goodbye to Gay Rights!

[quote] People aren't talking nearly enough about the Equality Act that Biden says he'll enact within 100 days of taking office.

[quote] This act changes the definition of "sex" in the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include "gender identity." This will make all sex-based rights impossible to enforce. Should Sex Work Be Normalized?

Is everyone saying “sex work is work” in this thread cool with being denied unemployment if you get downsized and refuse to whore yourself? You’re ok with all social safety net services being replaced with the option of prostitution? Because that’s where this goes.

by Anonymousreply 3002/02/2021

The only absolute beauty/ugly breeding rule is that if a beautiful person and an ugly person have a daughter, she will look like the ugly parent.

Everything else is a crapshoot.

by Anonymousreply 3102/03/2021

Who knows what kind of jawline lies beneath that beard.

Oh, well. He’s very brave, so good luck to him.

by Anonymousreply 3202/03/2021

So happy for him 💓 Beautiful 🌹

by Anonymousreply 3302/03/2021

[quote]Beautiful people don't necessarily birth beautiful people. Look around sometimes.

People don't birth people full stop. People bear people or give birth to people.

People berth ships.

by Anonymousreply 3402/03/2021

OP of this thread makes some good points:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 3502/03/2021

r13 Using 'dyke' as a slur on a gay board? Really?

by Anonymousreply 3602/03/2021

Why don’t you take a look at what people have said about gay men on this thread alone, R36?

by Anonymousreply 3702/03/2021

I’m glad I had an abortion.

by Anonymousreply 3802/03/2021

Breeders do this narcissistic shit every day of the week and no one says a thing except "what a miracle" it is.

My old boss did this, she didnt want to go through with the discomfort of labor. So being the upwardly Boomer she was, she just bought one. Jokes on her, last time I checked the kid was 16 and looked like an ugly ginger Jeffery Dahmer.

by Anonymousreply 3902/03/2021

On a teacher's salary? He's nuts.

by Anonymousreply 4002/03/2021

And what's going to be that creature's carbon footprint? HMMM? HMMMMMMMM????

by Anonymousreply 4102/03/2021

r39 Potentially that sounds like an utter nightmare in the making!

by Anonymousreply 4202/16/2021

When and why did this trend of men taking off their shirt to hold the baby? Is it some deep seated need to nurse the baby perhaps? I find it strange.

by Anonymousreply 4302/16/2021

Is that shit in the birthing pool ?

by Anonymousreply 4402/16/2021

They never think about the needs of the baby. This doesn't bode well for that kids future.

by Anonymousreply 4502/16/2021

r45, no, it doesn't bode well for anyone to come into the world via human trafficking for a parent who thinks women's bodies are rental commodities.

by Anonymousreply 4602/17/2021

Kill all homophobic dykes.

by Anonymousreply 4702/17/2021

It's not "men" who do this. It's parents in general who've been counseled to do this, because according to specialists it's comforting for the baby to have skin to skin contact with the parents.

by Anonymousreply 4802/17/2021

[quote] They never think about the needs of the baby. This doesn't bode well for that kids future.

Of course all gay men think of their children’s future. Because no gay man can have a child without a huge amount of effort. It’s straight women who usually don’t.

by Anonymousreply 4902/17/2021

r49 Certainly gay men cannot have children accidentally.They HAVE to be planned events and in that regard a lot(although not all) of reckless ,unplanned and chaotic situations and outcomes will be avoided.

by Anonymousreply 5002/19/2021
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.


Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!