Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

White US professor admits she has pretended to be Black for years

A seasoned activist and professor of African American history at George Washington University has been pretending to be Black for years, despite actually being a white woman from Kansas City.

In a case eerily reminiscent to Rachel Dolezal, Jessica A Krug took financial support from cultural institutions such as the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture for a book she wrote about fugitive resistance to the transatlantic slave trade. But according to a Medium post allegedly written by Krug herself, her career was rooted in a “toxic soil of lies”.

“To an escalating degree over my adult life, I have eschewed my lived experience as a white Jewish child in suburban Kansas City under various assumed identities within a Blackness that I had no right to claim: first North African Blackness, then US rooted Blackness, then Caribbean rooted Bronx Blackness,” she wrote.

In Krug’s book Fugitive Modernities, published before her confession, she writes in her acknowledgments: “My ancestors, unknown, unnamed, who bled life into a future they had no reason to believe could or should exist. My brother, the fastest, the smartest, the most charming of us all. Those whose names I cannot say for their own safety, whether in my barrio, in Angola, or in Brazil.”

Krug went by the name Jessica La Bombalera in activist circles and could be seen speaking in a New York City public hearing on police brutality in June.

“I’m Jessa Bombalera. I’m here in El Barrio, East Harlem – you probably have heard about it because you sold my fucking neighborhood to developers and gentrifiers,” she begins as she introduces herself. A few moments later, she adds: “I wanna call out all these white New Yorkers who waited four hours with us to be able to speak and then did not yield their time for Black and Brown indigenous New Yorkers.”

Those who knew Krug as La Bombalera have taken to social media today to announce their upset. “I’m dazed and still processing my emotions, but mostly, I feel betrayed, foolish and, in many ways, gaslit,” said the author Robert Jones Jr on Twitter.

As far back as 2018, Jones had published his conversations with Krug in a thread he wrote for marginalized communities.

Krug alludes in her Medium post to a traumatic childhood and mental health issues, but says she does not believe they can be used to excuse her behavior.

“To say that I clearly have been battling some unaddressed mental health demons for my entire life, as both an adult and child, is obvious. Mental health issues likely explain why I assumed a false identity initially, as a youth, and why I continued and developed it for so long.

“But mental health issues can never, will never, neither explain nor justify, neither condone nor excuse, that, in spite of knowing and regularly critiquing any and every non-Black person who appropriates from Black people, my false identity was crafted entirely from the fabric of Black lives,” she wrote.

The Guardian has reached out to Krug and George Washington University’s Columbian College of Arts and Sciences, in Washington DC, for comment.

In 2015, the civil rights activist and former chapter president of the NAACP Rachel Dolezal was outed by her parents for impersonating a Black person when she was born white. Dolezal’s own history of childhood trauma was later revealed. Dolezal later referred to herself as “the world’s first trans-black case”.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 147November 8, 2020 12:18 AM

Rachel Dolezal has never admitted to “pretending to be black.” She does identify as black.

by Anonymousreply 1September 4, 2020 2:30 AM

You have to ask how the hell this went on for so long? Do you think she was finally being blackmailed by someone who knew the truth?

by Anonymousreply 2September 4, 2020 2:30 AM

[quote]Rachel Dolezal has never admitted to “pretending to be black.” She does identify as black.

But she's admitted that she doesn't have Black ancestry -- that she's only black in the sense that Caitlyn Jenner is female.

by Anonymousreply 3September 4, 2020 2:32 AM

What transphobia and cisracism!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 4September 4, 2020 2:40 AM

People will rightfully criticize this yet will celebrate the fact that the director of Rutgers University's Women's Studies program is a man who calls himself "Catherine".

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 5September 4, 2020 2:49 AM

[quote]I have not only claimed these identities as my own when I had absolutely no right to do so — when doing so is the very epitome of violence, of thievery and appropriation, of the myriad ways in which non-Black people continue to use and abuse Black identities and cultures...

Does she think what she did is common?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 6September 4, 2020 2:50 AM

Me no understand.

by Anonymousreply 7September 4, 2020 2:51 AM

Pocahontas Liz Warren lost the presidency because of this b/s. But she had lots of jobs thanks to being a Native-American, all 0.001% of her.

by Anonymousreply 8September 4, 2020 2:54 AM

Melania thinks she's American. Don't worry, y'all crazy bitches get a pass.

by Anonymousreply 9September 4, 2020 3:03 AM

Melania is a USh shitishen.

by Anonymousreply 10September 4, 2020 3:11 AM

There’s a video of her in NYC screaming about white people not giving up their turn to speak at a meeting to POC.

by Anonymousreply 11September 4, 2020 3:14 AM

So woke social justice warriors are actually mentally ill grifters who only pretend to care about social justice because it's a means to their own various selfish ends?

Tell me something I don't know.

by Anonymousreply 12September 4, 2020 3:16 AM

[quote] Tell me something I don't know.

You're being a shouty drunk again.

by Anonymousreply 13September 4, 2020 3:22 AM

In Canada: Transgendered poet lied about being Indigenous. He's a PhD student in Gender Studies and I believe he was or is teaching.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 14September 4, 2020 3:31 AM

R14 are you mad? You're using the wrong pronouns. You are going to be stalked and killed.

by Anonymousreply 15September 4, 2020 3:33 AM

[R14] That dude lady is so pale. Looks every inch a Lutheran by blood.

by Anonymousreply 16September 4, 2020 3:41 AM

Crazy people are getting so much attention now, they must be having a blast.

by Anonymousreply 17September 4, 2020 3:59 AM

"I cancel myself"

Translation:

"I'm only admitting this as a preemptive strike, and don't actually want to take responsibility for my actions."

by Anonymousreply 18September 4, 2020 4:11 AM

Yes, we knew

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19September 4, 2020 4:13 AM

Next...Shaun King

by Anonymousreply 20September 4, 2020 4:27 AM

The self-contempt in the article is a typically feminine tactic. On the outside, the woman seems to humble herself in recognition of her deep flaws as a person, as proof that she is "taking responsibility" for what she has done. Deep down, however, the objective behind this abject treatment of oneself is to provoke the compassion of onlookers and potential assailants, to disarm them of their vengeful disposition and thus save themselves from future attacks.

Men are different. Because they are less anxious and think more highly of their ability to fend for themselves, they are less concerned with the possibility of being attacked in the future; moreover, many of them find it repulsive to be considered an object of compassion for others. That is why men never go very deeply in their apologies - they never humiliate themselves, never bare their soul in public and never describe in excruciating detail their acts of betrayal and bad faith, even when their feeling of shame and remorse is genuine.

In Social Justice circles, where female sensibility sets the tone, male stoicism is seen as arrogance, as a sign of lack of repentance. The fact, however, is that people deal with guilt differently, and neither way is more genuine than the other; in the two I described above, I can see surreptitious forms of selfishness in both.

Jessica Krug is cleaning up her mess in one coup, not because her sense of guilt is pure, lacking in any form of self-regard, but because, in her view, following such a radical strategy, that of scorching the earth of her public persona, will make it easier for her to fall into the silence of obscurity and begin her healing process, than if she is thrown into the public eye repeatedly in the future by a slower drip-drip of revelations.

by Anonymousreply 21September 4, 2020 5:08 AM

R3 Not necessarily. The parents that raised her are white, but Rachel is not sure they are her biological parents.

by Anonymousreply 22September 4, 2020 5:11 AM

Time to bring back mental institutions for these race/gender denialists.

by Anonymousreply 23September 4, 2020 5:14 AM

R21 Interesting analysis! Thanks. I always find things like this fascinating. With my likely aspergers, I don't pick up on this kind of stuff, but it makes sense when you explain it.

by Anonymousreply 24September 4, 2020 5:16 AM

It is not so complicated. She was about to be outed. She is claiming mental illness -- a protected disability -- in case the University moves to rescind her tenure.

I myself don't particularly care what race she presents herself to be. I know African-Americans who are trembling for their lives went to Harvard, live in luxury, with summer homes in the Hamptons. Race obscures class so effectively that I couldn't care what race she pretends to be.

by Anonymousreply 25September 4, 2020 5:21 AM

Yo, sistah.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 26September 4, 2020 5:24 AM

If men can think they're women, white women can believe they're black, and I can believe that I am pussy cat.

by Anonymousreply 27September 4, 2020 5:40 AM

Dull people trying to make themselves appear fascinating. It doesn’t work.

by Anonymousreply 28September 4, 2020 5:43 AM

Yes, R21.

by Anonymousreply 29September 4, 2020 5:44 AM

Her apology is as much a lie as her entire life. Why would she start being honest, just now, when every single day up until this point has been a blackface charade?

... and not a convincing charade, at that. Her accent and dialect in that tirade video are embarrassingly bad.

She sounds like a white chick from Kansas, no surprise. In her apology she simply continues to affect the vernacular she has learned in her circles, to completely abase herself publicly and hope for some forgiveness.

by Anonymousreply 30September 4, 2020 5:44 AM

I bet this kind of thing is infinitely more common among women than men.

by Anonymousreply 31September 4, 2020 5:44 AM

A life built on masquerade is a constant in American culture through history. I am so fascinated by this because many people fake their identities up to a "reasonable" limit. And then there are the crazies. Makes for good literature but yikes, the people they deceive.

Her employer MUST fire her, but she then deserves the right to rehabilitate her life.

by Anonymousreply 32September 4, 2020 5:58 AM

Meh. Do what you want, live how you want, be what you want, I just don't fucking care.

by Anonymousreply 33September 4, 2020 6:05 AM

[quote] Jessica Krug is cleaning up her mess in one coup, not because her sense of guilt is pure, lacking in any form of self-regard, but because, in her view, following such a radical strategy, that of scorching the earth of her public persona, will make it easier for her to fall into the silence of obscurity and begin her healing process, than if she is thrown into the public eye repeatedly in the future by a slower drip-drip of revelations.

Agree r21, although if her Medium piece is any indication, it’s doubtful much healing will be going on.

A Rachel Dolezal has the fortitude and sense of self to attempt to defend her assumed identity in the media, but this woman doesn’t. While Dolezal had a black husband and biracial child, Krug has zero familial connection to the AA and Latino communities she claimed membership in.

Krug had enough brass to deceive her associates and employers, but the blowback is going to be devastating.

by Anonymousreply 34September 4, 2020 6:16 AM

Dolezal actually looked like she’d pass.

This woman looks like one of those ‘transmen’ who go back to being lesbians when it’s convenient. I bet she dropped the ebonics to demand to speak to the manager.

by Anonymousreply 35September 4, 2020 6:20 AM

I wonder if queer studies departments have faux trans professors. Faking it should be easy enough. It's not like anyone is going to check your junk. And you can keep fucking whoever you please as long as you say you're now a lesbian or whatever works.

by Anonymousreply 36September 4, 2020 7:10 AM

Straight ciswomen realize you can just call yourself ‘non-binary’ to claim gay men’s struggle.

by Anonymousreply 37September 4, 2020 7:20 AM

Trans-obsessive lesbian rad-fems or whatever the fuck you ladies are, all things are not about your hatred for trans people.

This is about race.

by Anonymousreply 38September 4, 2020 7:44 AM

[quote] Trans-obsessive lesbian rad-fems or whatever the fuck you ladies are, all things are not about your hatred for trans people.

They try to make everything about trans. Everything.

by Anonymousreply 39September 4, 2020 8:02 AM

Well...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 40September 4, 2020 8:42 AM

Can pass for LatinX too:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 41September 4, 2020 8:43 AM

The Pan-Ethnic look:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 42September 4, 2020 8:44 AM

Nasty looking. Hideous hair, too.

by Anonymousreply 43September 4, 2020 8:47 AM

She's just fat and ugly.

by Anonymousreply 44September 4, 2020 8:52 AM

R5 the term “Women’s Studies” hasn’t been used for at least 10 years in most universities. It’s been Genser Studies for at least the past 15.

by Anonymousreply 45September 4, 2020 9:00 AM

As well as having a black husband and biracial child, Dolezal has brothers who were adopted who were black, one of whom later chose to live with her rather than their parents. If you watch her documentary, it’s clear that she has issues galore but there was almost a weird internal logic (as obviously unacceptable as it was) about part of her reason for adopting a black identity, being how she felt about her white family. She obviously still was totally wrong to do what she did.

From what I’ve read of Krug’s posts, they make her sound even worse than Dolezal. Completely insufferable appropriating charlatan.

Comments above re men and women — will be interesting if an individual known as “TalcumX” is ever the subject of one of these stories...

by Anonymousreply 46September 4, 2020 9:10 AM

[quote]As well as having a black husband and biracial child, Dolezal has brothers who were adopted who were black, one of whom later chose to live with her rather than their parents. If you watch her documentary, it’s clear that she has issues galore but there was almost a weird internal logic (as obviously unacceptable as it was) about part of her reason for adopting a black identity, being how she felt about her white family. She obviously still was totally wrong to do what she did.

Yes, her situation seemed complex. Apparently her parents favored their adopted (black) children over her too.

by Anonymousreply 47September 4, 2020 9:17 AM

Re: masqueraders

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 48September 4, 2020 9:17 AM

David Hampton

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 49September 4, 2020 9:19 AM

Korla Pandit

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 50September 4, 2020 9:21 AM

Billy Tipton

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 51September 4, 2020 9:23 AM

"Supermodel" genius Melania

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 52September 4, 2020 9:24 AM

Men pretend to be women every day and anyone not willing to pretend is shamed. Why shouldn't people be able to chage their racial identify to better reflect how they see themselves?

by Anonymousreply 53September 4, 2020 9:28 AM

There are many cases in which they do. If you're the only mixed race child in a family -- and can pass -- it's not uncommon to just go along with the rest of the family's identity.

by Anonymousreply 54September 4, 2020 9:31 AM

r53 other people should have the info that it's pretend. This woman's identity is connected to her scholarship. It's dishonest. And her POC identity is related to affirmative action that affected any part of her hiring and attainment of tenure. Also, she made herself very involved in identity politics without anyone knowing she "opting" for the identity, furthermore from a non "subaltern" original identity WHITE. Fraud.

If someone shames you for your unwillingness to "pretend" a trans is the desired gender, you don't have to take on the "shame". Nor do you have to pretend. You know exactly what is going on. People in this person's life did not know what was going on. Why is this so difficult to understand.

Are you just trolling to be a contrarian?

by Anonymousreply 55September 4, 2020 9:34 AM

R38 People are simply pointing out the hypocrisy. At the end of the day, there is literally no material difference between a white person who "identifies" as black and a male/female who "identifies" as the opposite sex.

R45 Rutgers calls it "Women's and Gender Studies" (as do hundreds of other universities). So yes, this is a man leading a Women's Studies program.

by Anonymousreply 56September 4, 2020 9:43 AM

The difference people are pointing out is whether people ANNOUNCE publicly their identity role playing, or lie about it and hide it, and yet benefit from the role playing.

by Anonymousreply 57September 4, 2020 9:48 AM

[quote]At the end of the day, there is literally no material difference between a white person who "identifies" as black and a male/female who "identifies" as the opposite sex.

Disagree.

by Anonymousreply 58September 4, 2020 9:50 AM

Excellent and well thought out point of view, r58.

by Anonymousreply 59September 4, 2020 9:51 AM

Jessica A Krug could have said, hello grant making foundations, hello university HR departments, I am a white jewish woman who identifies as black and here is my scholarship and my experience. She did not.

If a university wants to put a trans woman at the head of Women's Studies, they know what decision they are making.

If GW had wanted to hire a person DEEP into fraudulent identity role-playing they could do so. They did not know that.

by Anonymousreply 60September 4, 2020 9:51 AM

[quote] Excellent and well thought out point of view, [R58].

This has nothing to do with gender. You're just a rad fem trying to make it about trans, like you do with everything.

The realities of race in America is that it is a far more binary thing than gender.

Light-skinned black people and gay men do not have comparable experiences for instance.

by Anonymousreply 61September 4, 2020 9:53 AM

[quote]Crazy people are getting so much attention now

They always have, the media LOVES to lavish attention on the mentally ill and on grifters, because they know stupid people with an agenda will use these extreme cases as "typical examples" of whatever their pet hate cause is.

For this, you get the:

- this is what all SJWs are like

- this is what all trans are like

- this is what all anti-racists are like

- this is what all Millennials are like

- this is what all academics are like

- this is what all liberals are like

And probably more that I haven't seen yet. It's fucking stupid as hell, but the media will never go broke pandering to idiots.

by Anonymousreply 62September 4, 2020 9:53 AM

R57 Both are reprehensible. The difference is that "Catherine" can LARP as a woman publicly with zero repercussions and will likely even receive awards and attention. This white woman, on the other hand, had to keep things under wraps. Make no mistake that if "transraciality" were celebrated that she would be completely open about it.

R58 Is the psychotic tranny troll who believes that little gay boys should be doing drag and that all women (or "fish" as he calls them) are pathological narcissists. He has deep-seated issues with gay men and women (check his posting history).

by Anonymousreply 63September 4, 2020 9:58 AM

[quote]that all women (or "fish" as he calls them) are pathological narcissists.

Well, this woman is doing nothing to disprove that.

by Anonymousreply 64September 4, 2020 10:01 AM

The difference between Krug and a trans woman is that gender identity issues are real and identifiable and do need to be treated, whereas the likes of Krug are just grifters, who don’t really actually believe they are black.

The key issue with trans identity in the modern arena has been requiring everyone else other than the trans person themselves to agree (including under penalty) that a man who thinks he is a woman actually IS a woman, as opposed to a person with gender identity disorder who should be helped and supported but of course isn’t actually female. It’s the insistence that we not notice that sex is real and can’t be changed, not the request for respect, that has caused most of the issues.

By comparison, Krug is a simple charlatan who found a way to get attention and it sounds, financial gain by pretending to be something she’s not.

by Anonymousreply 65September 4, 2020 10:16 AM

[quote]Men pretend to be women every day

And women pretend to be men. Lest we forget, transgenderism grows more in teen girls and young women than in any other demographic class.

In fact, I think that all these processes and events are related to each other. What motivated this woman is probably the same thing that has caused the rapid growth in bisexuality, queerness and, later, transgenderism among young females: the glamorization of marginalized identities and the use of social identities to give oneself a more discernible and interesting personality. Curiously, Dolezal identifies himself as bisexual; I wouldn't be surprised if the same was true of Krug.

Queer imposture cases must be much more frequent than those of race, because queerness is much easier to fake. There is even vocabulary in LGBT circles to protect those who are accused of faking their queerness: for example, people who launch the accusation can be just accused, in their turn, of "gatekeeping", which signals that they can be safely ignored. So far, however, there is no rhetorical mechanism to protect race-fakers.

As with bisexuality and transgenderism, blackness is seeing its cultural capital rise. So it is to be expected that now there are cases of white people trying to pass for the now more fashionable black. Especially women, who seem much more suggestible, attuned to changes in social trends, and obsessed with personal identity. Dolezal and Krug are not the only examples. Others exist, and they might use more subtle tactics: for example, instead of pretending to be black, pretend you're a white with one black grandparent. Young white women have been outed on Twitter for doing that. Pretending to be part-Asian also seems common in these online media.

by Anonymousreply 66September 4, 2020 10:29 AM

* Dolezal identifies [bold]herself [/bold] as bisexual

by Anonymousreply 67September 4, 2020 10:30 AM

Good post, R66.

by Anonymousreply 68September 4, 2020 10:32 AM

R65 You act under the assumption that there aren't people out there right now exploiting transgender identity to obtain benefits. Dave/Danielle Muscato, Jonathan/Jessica Yaniv, Charles/Charlotte Clymer, Jacob Lawrence/Violet Hargrave, Richard/Terra Jones, Rhys McKinnon/Veronica Ivy (I could go on, but you get my point). These are all exceptionally unsavory men who utilize their transgender self-identification (how "real" it is is irrelevant) as a means to attain money and influence. A male becoming head of a Women's Studies program is as insane and ridiculous as the latest transracial scandal.

by Anonymousreply 69September 4, 2020 10:35 AM

[quote]A male becoming head of a Women's Studies program is as insane and ridiculous as the latest transracial scandal.

It's Gender Studies, isn't it?

But why?

by Anonymousreply 70September 4, 2020 10:37 AM

Men and women who are trans are surely as entitled to study gender as anyone else.

by Anonymousreply 71September 4, 2020 10:37 AM

Yes, R69, the likes of Muscato and Clymer are true charlatans in my opinion, but for me, being transgender does actually exist in the world and is identifiable, indeed that’s exactly why jokes like Muscato et al can be identified and dismissed — they are not actually suffering gender dysphoria, but simply jumped onto the identity bandwagon for what it can get them. Equally, Caitlyn Jenner is an old-school transvestite whose testosterone levels have dropped and wanted to be in the limelight for something.

By contrast, I do believe there are “genuine” trans people out there, who don’t deserve to be dismissed out-of-hand, accused of “LARPing” or compared to the likes of Krug. This is one reason why medical pathways should be maintained and not self-ID etc, in order that the small number of actually trans people can be identified and treated.

It’s also why we need to stop this “trans women are women” stuff. The world is just not going to accept it, because it’s inherently untrue (the statement itself is by its own formulation, false) and people will always object. “Genuine trans women would like respect and to occupy the gender role of ‘woman’ where possible providing actual women are ok with that” was what we were previously doing. Not only did this work well, but there were far fewer people identifying as trans, because only the genuine trans have a hope of meeting the standard (no-one, including Muscato, thinks Muscato is a woman or even thinks he is a woman).

by Anonymousreply 72September 4, 2020 10:43 AM

R69 - most of us agree both kinds of identity role-playing result in outrageous self-interest. The difference is that the University who hires the trans woman KNOWS they are doing so. The city or state who allow trans athletes to compete in gendered HS or College sports - they KNOW they are allowing this.

This POC historian is a total fraud and was secret about it.

by Anonymousreply 73September 4, 2020 10:44 AM

R31 R35 R36 R37 R39 R47 R54 R58 R61 R64 R68 R70 R71 All of these posts come from the same troll.

Some gems from his posting history include:

- Says that Bruce Jenner looks better than actual women

- Derailed a thread about a Moroccan tranny responsible for the suicides of multiple gay men

- Constantly screeches about women (specially lesbians) and calls them "TERFs", "fish", "dykes", etc

- Believes all women are narcissists

- Thinks little gay boys should be doing drag

- Claims that he came here "for Lucille Ball discussions", yet his posting history shows that he's just a pathetic troll

by Anonymousreply 74September 4, 2020 10:44 AM

R72 I have no problem with "old school" transsexuals like Buck Angel who fully acknowledge their biological sex, if that's what you're wondering. Same way I wouldn't care much about someone who is transracial (who might be suffering from an equally valid psychological condition) yet is open about their real ethnic background. People who experience Body Integrity Dysphoria (BID) "identify" as disabled, for example, yet conspicuously enough never receive ass pats from the wokesphere.

R73 And like I already mentioned, the "knowing" is not exactly important here. Transgender grifters operate in a political climate that is, at present time, exceptionally beneficial to them, unlike their transracial counterparts. A man like Rhys McKinnon who is openly and brazenly stealing gold medals from women is just as much of a charlatan as the white woman in the OP.

by Anonymousreply 75September 4, 2020 11:00 AM

r36 every time I apply for a grant, fellowship, award, I think, "I wonder how much my chances would go up if I 'identified' as trans?"

by Anonymousreply 76September 4, 2020 11:04 AM

If you can change your sex, then you can change your race.

by Anonymousreply 77September 4, 2020 12:06 PM

[quote]If you can change your sex, then you can change your race.

It's harder to physically present as black if you're white (and vice versa) than to pass as the opposite gender of your own race.

by Anonymousreply 78September 4, 2020 12:30 PM

“Lived experience.” People who say that should be run over by a tank.

by Anonymousreply 79September 4, 2020 12:45 PM

Really every Gender or Women’s Studies Department should be headed by a gay man.

We’re the only ones who truly get gender.

by Anonymousreply 80September 4, 2020 1:10 PM

God the trolling and fake likes at R80... jeez

by Anonymousreply 81September 4, 2020 3:17 PM

So gay men shouldn’t be allowed teach Gender Studies?

by Anonymousreply 82September 4, 2020 3:35 PM

FF show up as likes now

by Anonymousreply 83September 4, 2020 3:35 PM

Really, r83?

Not for me

by Anonymousreply 84September 4, 2020 3:38 PM

R8 - there's no evidence Elizabeth Warren got any jobs for being Native American. Rightwing bullshit. And she certainly didn't teach about Native American history or write books about it.

She was a law professor who is extremely credentialed, cited and respected.

by Anonymousreply 85September 4, 2020 4:06 PM

She was written about as ‘Harvard’s first Native American professor’ if I remember.

So there’s that.

by Anonymousreply 86September 4, 2020 4:09 PM

Elizabeth Warren escaped career collapse by the skin of her teeth. Very lucky.

by Anonymousreply 87September 4, 2020 4:10 PM

and Donald Trump has pretended to be a human being all these years!!

by Anonymousreply 88September 4, 2020 4:18 PM

Elizabeth Warren is a joke. In more than one way.

But, specifically: it is an utter disgrace that she ever claimed Native American ancestry and made that a feature of her character. Many American citizens would, on a full DNA test, test at similar (as in, negligible) levels for native ancestry.

R85, she is on record pointing to her Native American background to get ahead. Fact. And yet she is white all day every day, forever. Ugh.

by Anonymousreply 89September 4, 2020 4:18 PM

It's amazing the lack of interest the media took in Warren's race lie.

Of course, they were in the bag for her.

Maybe it would've been different if she'd claimed to be black.

It definitely would've been different if Pete had claimed to be Native American. He was attacked just for existing.

by Anonymousreply 90September 4, 2020 4:26 PM

R55 Young men claiming to be trans women are taking girls awards and scholarships in sports. That is no so different from this person having benefited from affirmative action.

In both cases someone took an opportunity away from a minority.

by Anonymousreply 91September 4, 2020 5:24 PM

Women are not a minority.

by Anonymousreply 92September 4, 2020 5:25 PM

Interesting that she would voluntarily pose as a member of a group that says their daily lives are filled with terror because of the colour of their skin.

And interesting that she would effectively steal jobs, book deals and promotions from genuine members of that terrorised group.

by Anonymousreply 93September 4, 2020 5:50 PM

R91 you are deliberately obtuse. The theft of an opportunity is the same. But the trannies are doing it with THE HELP AND KNOWLEDGE of the powers that be. There is no lie. No deception. Everyone knows its fowl identity politics. This POC historian cunt cheated everyone without their knowledge. They had no chance to REFUSE. Do you get the difference now, you twat?

by Anonymousreply 94September 4, 2020 5:51 PM

No straight man pretends to be gay.

Make what you will of that.

by Anonymousreply 95September 4, 2020 5:54 PM

Warren was so dumb walking into Trumps trap. She may be book smart but she is people idiot.

by Anonymousreply 96September 4, 2020 6:08 PM

[Quote] she is on record pointing to her Native American background to get ahead. Fact. And yet she is white all day every day, forever. Ugh.

Wrong. She was told all her life that she had Native American blood but never used it for career advancement. The Boston Globe investigated this in-depth and concluded it could find no evidence that claiming a bit of Native American in her helped her in the least

by Anonymousreply 97September 4, 2020 6:45 PM

[Quote] Warren was so dumb walking into Trumps trap. She may be book smart but she is people idiot.

Most of it was forgotten by the time she an for President. Her issue was she was old and too lefty. Biden, also old, was seen as a more moderate candidate and better able to beat Trump because he can’t label Biden as a commie

by Anonymousreply 98September 4, 2020 6:47 PM

[quote]Wrong. She was told all her life that she had Native American blood

No.

She put down her race as White on documentations before that.

Stop lying, dyke.

by Anonymousreply 99September 4, 2020 6:48 PM

Like this woman, Warren literally stole opportunities from the same oppressed group to which she pretended to belong.

Warren should pay a significant amount of her vast wealth to every single Native American who applied for the jobs she stole. This woman should do the same to the African American applicants to the jobs she stole.

by Anonymousreply 100September 4, 2020 6:54 PM

Did either of Warren's brothers call themselves Native American?

This whole thing seems to be overwhelmingly female.

by Anonymousreply 101September 4, 2020 6:59 PM

She does look latina and could pass for african-american. You know, Racists do not ask for your DNA test before they discriminate against you. I haven't read her research. Is it valid?

by Anonymousreply 102September 4, 2020 7:01 PM

[quote]Racists do not ask for your DNA test before they discriminate against you.

That's a good point, and one Whoopi made.

To some extent, at least, Rachel Dolezal lived the black experience.

This woman though... looks... I don't know... maybe Latinx?

by Anonymousreply 103September 4, 2020 7:03 PM

This woman looks white.

by Anonymousreply 104September 4, 2020 7:04 PM

STOP TYPING LATINX. A word that REAL latinos do not use. So yeah, this FAKE CUNT might use it.

by Anonymousreply 105September 4, 2020 7:07 PM

[quote] STOP TYPING LATINX. A word that REAL latinos do not use.

Hi.

People do not own language.

by Anonymousreply 106September 4, 2020 7:08 PM

She was a white graduate student from a second-tier university (Madison). In her case almost impossible to get a tenure track job in a metropolitan coastal area UNLESS she presented herself as a woman of color. Then, doors open.

She now has tenure from George Washington and will be very difficult to dislodge if she claims mental illness, as she is doing.

By the way, anybody who knows how the academy and especially the Ivies function knows that Elizabeth Warren profited from her identification as native American. Harvard counted her as a native American member of its faculty. I doubt that even now there are more than three or four faculty members who can "check this box". That made her incredibly precious within the symbolic currency of the American academy. Warren didn't need to do anything other than self-identify.

by Anonymousreply 107September 4, 2020 8:36 PM

r107 is right. This woman didn't just lie and deceive, she STOLE from her competitors of colour.

Same with Warren.

They both need to compensate the people they stole from for the value of what they stole.

by Anonymousreply 108September 4, 2020 8:41 PM

Elizabeth Warren thought she had native american ancestry because her grandparents told her this. There was NOT DNA testing back then. If anything, it is a honor that she wanted to be thought of as Native American.

Imagine, thinking you are from an certain area and culture, then with a DNA test finding out that is not the case. It is more difficult than is being depicted. You can live in an Africa country for generations, but have DNA from Asia. It is more complicated than how people are speaking about this.

by Anonymousreply 109September 4, 2020 8:43 PM

Bullshit, r109. She never was a member of the Ceherokee Nation, and no one else in her family claimed they were Cherokee. She also put white on her early documents.

She discovered that if she claimed minority status she could leapfrog into jobs she would not get otherwise. She stole from the genuinely Native applicants and she owes them recompense for her deceit and theft.

by Anonymousreply 110September 4, 2020 8:47 PM

It's unfortunate Breitbart and Fox could use Warren's bad judgement against her and leftism but it doesn't mean that Warren wasn't a liar. For example her family heirloom recipe book was all cribbed from published recipes. Warren can be a great "populist" legislator and defender of left causes, and a phony opportunist masquerader.

by Anonymousreply 111September 4, 2020 8:48 PM

And she "likes beer" just like folks.

by Anonymousreply 112September 4, 2020 8:49 PM

You can be raised by Native American relatives, but they are not blood (genetic) relatives. This reality would not show up in the DNA Ancestry test. Common on people, culture and family history is more complicated and nuance than how you are talking about it.

by Anonymousreply 113September 4, 2020 8:53 PM

Native Americans don’t give their DNA to databases. Apparently if you’ve got Native American ancestry it doesn’t always show up accurately and/or shows up as South American Native. I heard family legends about native ancestors but would never tell anyone about it since it really doesn’t matter unless you are raised in a tribe. Sometimes some well meaning dummy will compliment me about my high cheekbones and say I look native. As if no other group of people has prominent cheekbones....

by Anonymousreply 114September 4, 2020 9:54 PM

[quote]Native Americans don’t give their DNA to databases. Apparently if you’ve got Native American ancestry

The test Warren took, did have Native American DNA as reference, so that's irrelevant here. As already noted here, she copied a French chef's recipe so to pass it off a family recipe of native origin. Perhaps it is true that she did not invent those stories of native ancestors on her own, perhaps she heard them from her parents or grandparents, but it is still true that she added some deceptions of her own.

by Anonymousreply 115September 5, 2020 1:33 AM

Have any of you been in the closet, even in a single instance? If you're still judging her for her deception, think about that. Just sayin'.

by Anonymousreply 116September 5, 2020 2:45 AM

[quote]The test Warren took, did have Native American DNA as reference, so that's irrelevant here.

Only by the same "one drop" rule used to justify slavery.

by Anonymousreply 117September 5, 2020 2:51 AM

This DNA tests are not accurate. They are also dangerous given humans' history of ethnic conflict and genocide.

by Anonymousreply 118September 5, 2020 2:54 AM

She's still mostly white.

by Anonymousreply 119September 5, 2020 2:55 AM

She's completely white.

by Anonymousreply 120September 5, 2020 3:15 AM

R30, I agree, her “performance” as a Righteous Black Woman (from the “hood”, no less) is cringeworthy. She’s just acting out a racial stereotype that reinforces white supremacy. No wonder she was rewarded with tenure.

by Anonymousreply 121September 5, 2020 3:18 AM

[quote] Elizabeth Warren thought she had native american ancestry because her grandparents told her this. There was NOT DNA testing back then. If anything, it is a honor that she wanted to be thought of as Native American.

I’ve talked about this on DL before, but I’m Native. I used to assist with our tribe’s records, helping people find Native ancestors through genealogical records, etc. Well before commercial DNA testing became mass market there were still credible means for determining if you had a) Native heritage and, more importantly, b) could qualify for tribal enrollment. Yes, even back in the 80’s and 90’s.

Warren did none of that. She seems to have had no interest in actually becoming a member of the Cherokee, she just found the claim itself useful. I would think if you were going out of your way to claim Native heritage for something like a position at Harvard you’d have a bit more curiosity about said heritage rather than just taking it on the word of grandma.

by Anonymousreply 122September 5, 2020 3:36 AM

R94 "They had no chance to REFUSE" Who had "no chance to REFUSE"? Did Samoan weightlifter Iuniarra Sipaia, who came from a poor family and has dedicated her life to the sport, have a real chance to "refuse" (therefore wasting years of training) when faced with an obese, middle-aged troglodyte who had only started calling himself "Laurel" some months prior? You said it yourself: it's the powers that be that are pushing this nonsense. The fact that us plebeians are required to play along (under threat of public retaliation) in this Orwellian deception is, to me, orders of magnitude more horrifying than "Dolezal Part 2".

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 123September 5, 2020 3:48 AM

r116 is too stupid to live. What a fucking retard.

by Anonymousreply 124September 5, 2020 4:05 AM

Oh, r124, are you here to put us to sleep again with your pseudointellectual diatribes? It's just a fucking trashy gay gossip board, you loser. No one cares about your dimestore psycho analysis. Stop embarrassing yourself.

by Anonymousreply 125September 5, 2020 4:11 AM

r125 Yes, here is my psychological analysis of you: you are the dumbest motherfucker on this thread and possibly the entire Datalounge. Your IQ is leaking from your prolapsed anus. Fucking senile elderfairy.

by Anonymousreply 126September 5, 2020 4:15 AM

R123 by your logic, we can't discuss charlatan POC historian cunt because Tranny Tyranny is worse (and yeah maybe it is) but the WWII Holocaust was worse than Tranny Tyranny so you need to shut your piehole, and the Roman Empire's enslavement of vast lands was worse than the Holocaust, so I need to shut up and we all need to fucking shut up because I KNOW SOMETHING WORSE THAN YOUR PROBLEM gaaaaaah!

by Anonymousreply 127September 5, 2020 10:18 AM

That's one ugly Samoan dyke at R123.

She makes the girl in the middle look femme.

by Anonymousreply 128September 5, 2020 10:22 AM

"the glamorization of marginalized identities and the use of social identities to give oneself a more discernible and interesting personality. "

What a horseshit load of "logic."

Why, George Floyd was so fascinating a white police had to kneel in admiration on his neck until he was dead.

Fascinating!

by Anonymousreply 129September 5, 2020 10:39 AM

Interesting legal dilemma for GWU. That phony black professor should be fired, but she's boldly claiming her mental illness made her do it. Can GWU legally fire her for fraud, etc. if she's mentally ill? They can't very well continue to let her teach. Maybe GWU will pay her a million dollars to go away?

by Anonymousreply 130September 5, 2020 2:24 PM

She is a more credible speaker on race than that diAngelo woman.

by Anonymousreply 131September 5, 2020 6:06 PM

R107 lol Madison is not a "second-tier school" -- it has the #6 ranked sociology PhD program according to USNWR (I Think that's what Krug studied). It's top 10 in graduate rankings in several fields of economics, mathematics, and computer science, too.

by Anonymousreply 132September 5, 2020 6:27 PM

She could have had native American as non genetic relatives. We all could. This would not show up in the DNA ancestry test.

Another Example:

You could be Asian. You could have grow up in Kenya and speak swahlili. However, the DNA Ancestor test will should that you are of asian descent. This person or a relative could marry into a family of white Americans. The grandkids could say they had relatives who were african. The test will just should asian. The grandkids were told this and it is also true. This type of family line does not show up on a DNA test.

UNDERSTAND?

by Anonymousreply 133September 5, 2020 11:46 PM

Yet another example:

You think you are Penn Dutch and Germany decent because you were always told this from your family. You apply and receive scholarships to go to Germany to learn German. You are now a German Language Scholar at university. A DNA ancestry test, which your sibling does, discovers that you are actually Russia Jewish.

Gee, I wonder what in history would make this person relative's suppress their ethnic identity?

by Anonymousreply 134September 5, 2020 11:57 PM

Oh brother.

by Anonymousreply 135September 6, 2020 12:00 AM

She writes that she does not want to blame her mental illness for doing this, but then she blames her mental illness for her actions.

by Anonymousreply 136September 6, 2020 12:03 AM

Krug received various study grants and financial awards in her greasy climb to tenure, while agressively clapping back at any black woman who questioned her along the way, so yes she is way worse than Dolazel. LSA has a very good thread on her, featuring clips with her bad accent (her country of origin changed over rhe years, but she us actually a Russian Jew from Kansas).

by Anonymousreply 137September 6, 2020 12:06 AM

So did this thread get buried because of the trans thing? Because aside from that, I'd still love to discuss this grifter of woke. Turns out that not only is she a white girl from Kansas, she's an affluent white girl from Kansas who attended a pricey private school.

And while she's not teaching this semester, she still has tenure last time I checked--she's totally using the "mental illness" to hold on to it, you just know it. This woman has zero scruples. She clearly exists to make Rachel D. look less heinous by comparison. I think it's also pretty clear that she did it so she could be a diversity hire, which means not having to have the credentials of a white or Asian academic. She could pretend she didn't have the actual expensive education she had--so she looked exceptional for an afro-latina from the hood, not so much for a privileged white girl.

by Anonymousreply 138September 7, 2020 11:05 PM

"Toxic Soil of Lies" is a wonderful title for her forthcoming memoir.

by Anonymousreply 139September 7, 2020 11:09 PM

The schools lawyers will need time to figure out the options. This bitch is TOAST.

by Anonymousreply 140September 7, 2020 11:12 PM

All kinds of horrible people, like my younger sister, become SJWs or do SJW-acting routines for positive attention. Pretending to care, when they don't give a fuck one way or the other, is a means of virtue-signaling and collecting brownie points in progressive circles.

My sister's SJWing is aggressively phony and derivative, but it's a way of giving herself worth that she didn't have to begin with. "Look at ME, I'm GOOD now, you guys!" meanwhile is selfish, jealous, entitled, ungrateful, lazy and socially un-aware as they come.

by Anonymousreply 141September 7, 2020 11:26 PM

She totally could've passed for Latina, but black was really pushing it.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 142September 8, 2020 12:00 AM

Sure Juan.

What tipped you off? The big gold hoops?

by Anonymousreply 143September 8, 2020 2:39 AM

The only reason she could pass for Latina is that there are a lot of white Latinas. She has seriously white features--particularly that thin mouth. I'm guessing part of the reason her El Barrio shtick was laid on so thick is to keep people from challenging her.

Honestly, I don't know why she didn't just go for Latina, where there's no specific race requirement--I suppose she wanted maximum victim points.

I also now want to see her live as a white woman--and be robbed of her right to call people out on wokeness--not that white girls don't try, but more groveling is currently required.

by Anonymousreply 144September 8, 2020 3:48 AM

If she can't speak Spanish at a speed of at least 150 words a minute, then that should have been a dead giveaway that she was a Gringo.

by Anonymousreply 145September 8, 2020 5:02 AM

And if your area of scholarship is about race, Latina won't cut it.

by Anonymousreply 146September 8, 2020 12:05 PM

I’m a Latina from East Harlem and most of the young ones let’s say the under 35 do not speak Spanish very well or at all . Her put on accent was so awful and fake sounding it kind of reminded me of Al Pacino in Carlitos Way or Scarface.. Hilarious.🤣🤣🤣

by Anonymousreply 147November 8, 2020 12:18 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!