Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Lady Colin Campbell

Talk about gossip!

Curiosity about a link someone posted led me over to Youtube and the videos submitted by Lady Colin Campbell.

I started with the most recent one and have been working backwards. She answers questions submitted by viewers.

Name dropper extraordinaire!

So far, she's answered questions about Meghan and Harry (of course, lots of questions submitted about them), Kanga, Catherine Oxenberg which led to a discussion about JFK and a question asking how good was JFK in bed, Lord Lucan and the famous murder & disappearance, Consuelo Vanderbilt, Lady CC ex-husband who she labeled "a sociopath", and Lady CC's recent experience with the internet and "Sugars" and the PR of the Sussex team. This led to a fierce speech directly to the camera specifically warning "Sunshiny" people that she will become a very rich woman when she sues, as she has done before.

And I'm only partly through the 2nd video (moving backward from the most recent).

She mentions Dominic Dunne too. Sitting and listening to those 2 gossip together would have been a hoot,

by Anonymousreply 388Last Friday at 9:01 PM

You know she's not a 'lady' in either sense, right? She's also a racist, classist asshole.

by Anonymousreply 106/08/2020

^^Hi Megan.

by Anonymousreply 206/08/2020

I'm sure I'll like what she says but I cannot stand listening to her. Her voice is so off-putting.

A transcript - or the book when it comes out - would be preferable.

And who is "Leo" in the Qiana shirt?

by Anonymousreply 306/08/2020

Wikipedia has a nicely passive-aggressive article on her "prominent" family of origin.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 406/08/2020

"Lady" Colin Campbell is a fraud, a genetic male and has absolutely no contact with the royals.

She was married to Sir Colin Campbell for 6 months after knowing him less than a week.

She is ugly, nasty and huckster.

Ignore it.

by Anonymousreply 506/08/2020

^^Hello Harry

by Anonymousreply 606/08/2020

R6 So we can't say anything negative about Lady Campbell without being Meghan or Harry. The BRF nutter is back. Spray it. Spray it with fire!!!!!!!!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 706/08/2020

What a hoot, R2 and R6.

by Anonymousreply 806/08/2020

[quote]She answers questions submitted by viewers

Who is "she" and what's she doing answering questions on behalf of this old guy?

by Anonymousreply 906/08/2020

She is looking more fem lately, I'll give her that:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1006/08/2020

So Lady C has more than one verification that Meghan did indeed throw her hot tea at Admiralty House during the Australian tour because she deemed it unpotable. Sounds like her going off on the chef because she thought he'd included egg in a vegan dish, which wasn't the case.

by Anonymousreply 1106/13/2020

She's hawking a book. I doubt she reveals anything interesting until the book comes out. And even then...

by Anonymousreply 1206/13/2020

I absolutely adore this “show” or whatever it is, truly one of the only pleasures to come out of this horrendous quarantine time. Her perspective on the virus and astute observations historically contextualizing everything is simply awesome. And Prince Leo is ridiculously cute even though he seems dumb as a box of rocks. But so nice to look at... yum. The endless Harry & Megan stuff is sort of dull but I could listen to her read the phone book. It’s obviously very popular since some of the videos have over 100k views.

by Anonymousreply 1306/13/2020

For Americans, Lady Campbell is rather like Kitty Kelley in that she writes "scandalous" autobiographies that rely on anonymous sources. She is a bit of right-wing nutter and not politically correct, but she is very entertaining. Her autobiography was considered lurid at the time, but actually most of her "ridiculous claims" proved to be true. Her recent book on the Queen Mother is mostly a re-telling of the official biography but far less deferential.

Lady C has had an very interesting life. She was born with genital malformation (a fused labia and deformed clitoris) and was raised as a boy until she hit puberty, and later had correctional surgery as an adult.

Who is the cute gay guy interviewing her in these videos?

by Anonymousreply 1406/13/2020

R14 is he gay or just European?

by Anonymousreply 1506/13/2020

If the tea-throwing story is true, that's Meghan done for, no matter how hard she tries to jump on the BLM wagon and use it for cover.

Abusing staff is horrible, but physically abusing staff is truly lowest-of-the-low.

And she only got away with it because of her immense privilege.

If she weren't one of the most privileged women in the world she'd be in jail for assault right now.

by Anonymousreply 1606/13/2020

I haven't listened to her podcasts but a poster on another Meghan thread said it was confirmed that she threw it, but it's unclear whether it was directed at anyone.

by Anonymousreply 1706/13/2020

[quote]She is a bit of right-wing nutter and not politically correct,

How unlike a trans...unless it involves trans.

by Anonymousreply 1806/13/2020

When the story first surfaced after the Australia trip, and the story was that they were staying at Admiralty House in Sydney as guests of the Governor-General, where she threw HOT tea at a staffer, and the wife of the Governor-General made a formal complaint about the incident to the UK's Foreign Office, who arrange these trips.

If Lady CC is saying this is confirmed as true, then this coming out is truly bad news for vicious Meghan.

by Anonymousreply 1906/13/2020

I remember the tea-throwing gossip and the counter-story that Meghan had baked her “famous” banana bread for her hosts.

As if that’s a thing that ANYONE has EVER done; gone into a host’s kitchen and baked banana bread as a token of appreciation.

by Anonymousreply 2006/13/2020

The “gay guy” is Prince Leo of Austria (& Croatia?). An aristocrat now since Austria is now a republic, not a monarchy, although he still officially holds the title. The ridiculously complex situation is discussed in the most recent video. Also, Lady C held him to the flame on the gay or not gay issue and he either was too stupid to understand her implication or she was too resigned to make him answer. I say gay AND European (quelle horreur!).

by Anonymousreply 2106/13/2020

Sometimes it's enough to be appallingly entertaining and crassly, archly indiscreet. She has the intelligence to pull it off. She's not "intersexed."

She had a congenital anomaly that couldn't be addressed surgically until she was older. That's something at the DL, of all places, to turn into something it isn't? Not surprising, but it's a shame. There's so many other things to poke her with.

And she's created a way to keep attention on her, to keep people buying her books, and to bother people and (sometimes against their inclinations) to entertain them.

Right wing? Yeah. Yuck. But it doesn't make her Hitler.

Phony? Any celebrity has a nerve calling her out for that. She's a ridiculous artifice. So?


by Anonymousreply 2206/13/2020

I found it really interesting when Lady C said that the Dianna biography was supposed to be an authorized biography that they started working on for charity. Then Dianna started telling her obvious lies and got annoyed when Lady C would challenge her on them. Such typical BPD behaviour from Di. Lady C had to go through with the biography alone since she had already made a commitment to the publisher. (Also probably because she enjoyed the drama but I don't blame her)

I haven't watched the latest video yet but I've found the rest interesting so far. Though she's very restrained when she speculates compared to most gossip writers since she doesn't want to get sued. Meghan picked the wrong person to try and attack.

by Anonymousreply 2306/13/2020

r22, the posters on here attacking Lady C for her genital abnormality are not gay. They are a plague of locusts descended from Celebitchy/Sunshine Sachs who swarm every Meghan thread with the specific aim of first, defending Meghan and then, trying to get every UK Royalty thread shut down so we cannot speak about Meghan.

They are usually racist (pro-POC) and extremely homophobic, but they think of themselves as the Apex of Woke so they just post away, on a gay board, while gleefully insulting gay people.

They are not DataLounge. They are parasites.

by Anonymousreply 2406/13/2020

They are also failures, R24, because nothing they say or do has any influence on people's interests and observations here.

They're a nuisance and it's our job to out them (with FF's) every time we see them.

by Anonymousreply 2506/13/2020

Agreed, r25

by Anonymousreply 2606/13/2020

"Lady" Colin is a liar. Period.

by Anonymousreply 2706/13/2020

Hi Meghan^^^^

by Anonymousreply 2806/13/2020

Are there any members of the British aristocracy or aspirants who aren't conservative or "right wing" from birth if they're not apolitical?

by Anonymousreply 2906/13/2020

R4 That wiki is actually wrong and It be interesting to see when it was edited. I've read half of her one of her family biographies before getting bored with it and she does not claim that her father's family were in a preeminent social position in Jamaica. They were mainly just rich. It's her mother's family, the Smedmores, that were society and her father's marriage to her mother elevated him. Her mother's family were something and I had heard of her grandfather's murder before I read the book though I didn't know until reading it that he was her grandfather.

Not surprising that this thread deevolved to old debunked gossip about her. She's had her exhusband, Dianna and now Meghan spreading lies about her.

R27 You're really wrong here this time. I'm guessing you've only read the old reports by her ex? You know she actually did win that defamation suit? She's female, she was just unlucky to be born with a fused labia and crazy parents. Later on she had surgery to cut her labia open and I believe her grandmother gave her the money for the surgery. You can check my old posts if you want I'm not the type of person to call a he a she.

by Anonymousreply 3006/13/2020

Well, based on this clip, it is true that she knows members of the Markle family

I've caved and pre-ordered her book.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 3106/13/2020

r30 is correct. She wasn't born with a penis, she was born with something not entirely unlike the results of the cutting and stitching together of the outer vaginal skin done in some kinds of FGM

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 3206/13/2020

So, what astonishing thing did Megan do at the garden party?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 3306/13/2020

Lady CC is so full of shit. Next.

by Anonymousreply 3406/13/2020

I worked as a Production Assistant in the Canadian TV/Film industry from 1995 to 2013. I still live in Toronto, and I have many friends in the business. I know some people who worked on Suits and I've never heard a single positive thing about Meghan Markle. When the news broke that she was dating Harry, I know for a fact that members of both cast and crew were praying that she'd get married and quit the show. I don't much about this Lady Campbell person beyond the fact she's writing a book, and her revelations seem on the dime with the gossip surrounding Markle here in Toronto. I wonder what Markle is going to do now that her number one mouth piece (aka Jessica Mulroney) has to be cut off.

by Anonymousreply 3506/13/2020

ooooohhhh Excellent sauce, r35. Thank you!

by Anonymousreply 3606/13/2020

What kind of things did they say, r35?

by Anonymousreply 3706/13/2020

R33 - She supposedly stuck her tongue out at Camilla. Discussion starts at R133 at link.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 3806/13/2020

Well her son Dima Ziadie one cute hottie, she managed to pop him out.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 3906/13/2020

She didn’t, R39 - both her sons are adopted.

by Anonymousreply 4006/13/2020

No she, no Lady, no "insider. She was born in 1949 as George William Ziadie in Jamaica with genital malformation (a fused labia and deformed clitoris) and was raised as a boy until he hit puberty. Later he had correctional surgery in 1970 when 21, legally changing his name to Georgia Arianna to fit the new sex. Four years into being a woman, in March 1974 she married the younger second son of the eleventh Duke of Argyll. She had known Colin Ivar Campbell for five days, Younger sons of non-royal Dukes will not inherit and are styled as Lord. Argyll is a good dukedom ….. the Earls, Marquesses, and Dukes of Argyll were for several centuries among the most powerful noble families in Scotland throughout the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries. The Duke of Argyll also holds the hereditary titles of chief of Clan Campbell and Master of the Household of Scotland. Though the snag only was a non-inheriting son, let's say Georgia married up. Lord Colin Ivar Campbell! But Lord is not a title, it is a style. When married, the wife to such is styled as Lady. Just a polite form of recognition and address. Divorced, always questionable, Our Georgia has hung onto the style of Lady. She is a a fantasist and a good writer, can tell many a tall tale.

by Anonymousreply 4106/13/2020

R41 You don't understand basic 8th grade biology do you? Did you even read what you qouted? Literally your own post says 'genital malformation (a fused labia and deformed clitoris)' in your world do males have labia and clits? So yes she's female and yes she's only referred to by a title because of her exhusband. Almost everything you posted was already mentioned. Do keep up.

by Anonymousreply 4206/13/2020

THere's a whole documentary on Lady C framed around an old castle she bought. It's narrated by Mariam Margolyes

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 4306/13/2020

Where's the link with the stuff about Meghan sticking her tongue out at Camilla? The one R33 linked to is about Trump.

by Anonymousreply 4406/13/2020

Well then, I stand corrected. So having fused labia is a really bad thing. He is still a cutie, I'm glad he didn't touch her old tore up snatch, he is far too good for that. Fused labia will make nice convo at my next dinner party.

by Anonymousreply 4506/13/2020

[quote] According to Lady C, during a garden party celebrating both Prince Charles’ charity work and his 70th birthday, Meghan did something that allegedly “astonished” an attendee with “impeccable palace connections.” “I can’t repeat it exactly, it’s in the book, but what I can say is, something happened at the very first garden party at Buckingham Palace…we were all absolutely gobsmacked and astonished, we all thought this doesn’t bode well.”

Obviously she pulled her skirt down and took a shit out in the garden in front of just everybody.

by Anonymousreply 4606/13/2020

Lady Colin Campbell is my royal family hero.

by Anonymousreply 4706/13/2020

lol....took a shit in the garden....laffed my ta ta's off.

by Anonymousreply 4806/14/2020

I'm surprised s(he) hasn't been conveniently offed by now.

by Anonymousreply 4906/14/2020

She is revered by many in the UK as a source of fun and $$$

by Anonymousreply 5006/14/2020

[quote] She was born with genital malformation (a fused labia and deformed clitoris) and was raised as a boy until she hit puberty, and later had correctional surgery as an adult.

How would this "malformation" be mistaken for a boy's genitals? Did no one notice that he wasn't peeing through his teeny, malformed "penis"? And what evidence is there for this story beyond the say-so of her autobiography? I'm guessing she was just born male and got an old-fashioned sex change.

by Anonymousreply 5106/14/2020

^ I wonder. I've been watching the thing on Goring Castle posted by R43 (which is interesting in an architecture-porn + Grey Gardens way), and she seems very mannish. Not just her face and voice, but also her posture and gait. So, maybe a good old-fashioned sex change, or maybe a hormone issue in addition to the deformed genitals at birth?

by Anonymousreply 5206/14/2020

I know absolutely nothing about the woman, except what I’ve read online. My impression is that she’s a broken clock. She might be a little bit of a character, but she’s not stupid enough to print lies about important people. Especially ones who are prone to lawsuits.

by Anonymousreply 5306/14/2020

All of the conversation and exchanges about her congenital genital defect and what it means to posters, including Sunshine Sachs interns, is absolutely fucking boring.


by Anonymousreply 5406/14/2020

Agreed, R54. Back to Meghan - was the poster upthread kidding about her sticking her tongue out at Camilla? It's entirely plausible. I want to know what she did! I may buy the book just for that.

by Anonymousreply 5506/14/2020

Oh please, R24. I've heard about this "woman" for decades. How fucking dumb are you that you think anyone who points out the obvious, would have to be a fan of that Markle woman to know this "woman" was born a guy? Everyone normal knows it, STFU.

[quote]They are usually racist (pro-POC) and extremely homophobic, but they think of themselves as the Apex of Woke so they just post away, on a gay board, while gleefully insulting gay people.

And THIS is how you defend "her"? By being a typical, racist and trying to blame this on non-white people? Doesn't say much for you or "her" that you lick her ballsack as she reads Mein Kampf to you to get you hard. And then having the audacity to call us "homophobic" - bitch, I've been on DL for 20 fucking years. How long have you been here, asshole?

People have always had "questions" about him/her, so don't act like it's some new phenomenon, you racist jerk.

by Anonymousreply 5606/14/2020

typical racist*

by Anonymousreply 5706/14/2020

Don't care about her genitals, looking forward to the book.

by Anonymousreply 5806/14/2020

Lady C was born intersexed as we call it today. She was born with fused labia and deformed clitirous that in an infant would look fairly close to a penis and testicles. For most intersexed people, it's not just the genitals that are affected, but their hormones as well which is why some women who were born with this condition appear more "manish" and why some men appear more "womanly." Prior to the mid-1950s, most intersexed babies were identified and raised as males. This was typically done for cultural reasons (men being seen as the "superior" sex) and because the enlarged clitoris was presumed to be a penis. By the mid-1950s, that practice changed to raise most intersexed babies as female, because a larger percentage of intersexed babies are born with female internal organs. Today, genetic testing is done to determine biological sex. Lady C has hinted she is friends with a major Hollywood star who has the same condition as her, but was raised as a girl (likely Jamie Lee Curtis).

by Anonymousreply 5906/14/2020

R54 I know right I guess her pr is watching DL because they jumped on this thread so fast. I don't understand why they don't see that attacking and speculating about Lady Colin here and eslewhere is just making her more famous and therefore more people will buy her book.

R59 Spot on.

by Anonymousreply 6006/14/2020

SS is known for their crap PR, and they do not disappoint once again.

by Anonymousreply 6106/14/2020

Sunshine Sachs looks like a truly incompetent PR firm. Every public thing these two do makes them look awful - it's relentless. I know they're a great client "get" for SS because they are famous, but damn, SS's association with the Harkles is making their own SS PR brand look unbelievably bad.

by Anonymousreply 6206/14/2020

"Ali McGraw got mad with you for giving head to Steve McQueen/You and me we made a pretty pair falling through the silver sceen/Yes, I'm open to anything, I don't know where to draw the line/But I'm making bets that you don't get John Wayne before he dies/You're a Starfucker."

Mick Jagger/Keith Richards 1973 Promopub Music

by Anonymousreply 6306/14/2020

“Karma karma karma karma / Karma Chameleon / You come and go / You come and go... “

Sunshine Sach- I mean, Boy George 1983

by Anonymousreply 6406/15/2020

For a hundred bux, u can take a pic of her shaved pussy hole...

by Anonymousreply 6506/15/2020

"Lady" CC is a fraud and a liar.

She was married to her husband for less than 6 months.

Don't believe a word that comes out of its' mouth.

It's broke and will say anything to make a buck.

by Anonymousreply 6606/15/2020

Lady Campbell is so grand. Love her.

by Anonymousreply 6706/15/2020

R37 Basically what I heard was that she was a total bitch to the crew, several directors hated her, likely used the casting couch to get the part, she and Gabriel Macht did not get along.

by Anonymousreply 6806/15/2020

[r68] Oh please tell any of these stories in more detail.

by Anonymousreply 6906/15/2020

Thanks for the details, r68. Interesting. I wonder if Lady C has heard some of this and we might read about it in her upcoming book.

by Anonymousreply 7006/15/2020

I love Lady Colin Campbell. She is incredibly well-spoken and seems very intelligent. I bet her book will be as good as a book in this genre can possibly get. What is always shocking is how vacuous Harry and Meghan both are though, and how culturally deprived they both seem to be, so I suspect much of the material will be necessarily lowbrow.

by Anonymousreply 7106/15/2020

[quote] Her autobiography was considered lurid at the time, but actually most of her "ridiculous claims" proved to be true.

No. That's a lie. I actually read 2 of her books in the 1990s and they were full of lies. She would tell anyone that would listen/read that prince charles and camilla parker bowles were nothing more than good friends. That's pretty much what the entire books were about - Charles as the most faithful husband on earth and the rest of the book was all about "how Diana was imagining him cheating". And I do remember it being full of misspelled words

The royal family always had journalists on their side. Diana, Charles, Camilla, they all did. Diana had Andrew Morton, Richard Kaye on her side Camilla and chaz had penny junor, Arthur Edwards and a few others, who were more than happy to print lies or even go on tv and lie. But they at least knew C & C. The talk for many, many years was charles and camilla NEVER, EVER had an affair. But they did. even Winston Churchill's grandson went on tv and said, "there's no affair, it's all Diana's imagination". But it wasn't. They were all lying

And one more thing, colin campbell's books weren't that big back then. She was no Andrew Morton or James Whitaker. She was a hack. She still is.

by Anonymousreply 7206/15/2020

The only reason Dominick Dunne had anything to do with her is because she wrote a book about Lily Safra (whose husband was murdered). Dominick was obsessed with that case. If it wasn't for that, he wouldn't have acknowledged knowing her. Colin Campbell is not someone that anyone wants to admit they know

Diana was never "writing" a book with her. She was super careful with Andrew Morton. There's no way she'd have been involved with this hag

by Anonymousreply 7306/15/2020

One gets the real sense this creature was born intersex. If she was fully female, why the need to adopt? Not a popular thing for aristos at the time, self-styled or otherwise.

I suspect a Y chromosome somewhere... Normally someone such as this would gain my sympathy, but she is a nasty mean spirited person. Professional muckraker and Grade A shit-stirrer in my estimation. Too many gullible people are falling for her stories, not just about her gender. For years she defended Camilla & Chas. Spun that yarn as Di was obsessed, neurotic, and jealous...and that she personally knew they were merely "great friends". Why do people believe her now? My suspicion is that she's just the "trendy tranny" du jour, and that may be why she's such a continued curiosity for so many.

by Anonymousreply 7406/15/2020

Diana was obsessed, neurotic, and jealous.

by Anonymousreply 7506/15/2020

R75, That doesn't make her husband's repeated infidelity a figment of her imagination (as Creature Collin maintained, and wrote in one of her "books") now does it?

by Anonymousreply 7606/15/2020

R75, That doesn't make her husband's repeated infidelity a figment of her imagination (as Creature Collin maintained, and wrote in one of her "books") now does it?

by Anonymousreply 7706/15/2020

Why does what she has or had between her legs even matter? To care about that sort of thing is bigotry.

by Anonymousreply 7806/15/2020

It has zero bearing on what she writes. I love people here trashing her as if that makes whatever she says invalid without having read her book.

Why would anyone try to discredit her on the basis of her genitalia?

by Anonymousreply 7906/15/2020


[quote]R74: One gets the real sense this creature was born intersex. If she was fully female, why the need to adopt? Not a popular thing for aristos at the time, self-styled or otherwise. I suspect a Y chromosome somewhere... Normally someone such as this would gain my sympathy, but she is a nasty mean spirited person. Professional muckraker and Grade A shit-stirrer in my estimation. Too many gullible people are falling for her stories, not just about her gender. For years she defended Camilla & Chas. Spun that yarn as Di was obsessed, neurotic, and jealous...and that she personally knew they were merely "great friends". Why do people believe her now? My suspicion is that she's just the "trendy tranny" du jour, and that may be why she's such a continued curiosity for so many.


[quote]R76/R77: R75, That (sic) doesn't make her husband's repeated infidelity a figment of her imagination (as Creature Collin maintained, and wrote in one of her "books") now does it?


Another trolling crank with deviant ethics that uses any pretext that can be snatched to harp and hector hate speech about transgendered people. The woman had a congenital anomaly. Perhaps she had some hormonal issues associated with it. She is, however, a woman, and lives as a woman and has identified as a woman all her adult life, having been consigned to a male role as a child because of her biological issue, which was corrected.

Worse than denying Campbell's sex identity, this appalling poster equates being a terrible person with being trans/intersex/"different," and vice versa. Such demonizing, which lacks any use except slipping in bias, it tediously hateful.

In short, this poster, who does this sort of thing in other threads, is the sort of "creature" even the DL rejects. Pointless bitchery isn't intolerant bigotry.

Even shorter: Fuck you, you lunatic. And learn English.

by Anonymousreply 8006/15/2020

The Sussexstans will attack anyone for anything if that person does not worship Meghan.

And they are often total bigots, as you can see right here on this thread.

Oh the irony.

by Anonymousreply 8106/15/2020

R79 Sadly you are missing the point in your zealous quest to defend her. She lied to her husband, and that's why he divorced her. One should think that would be something to be "upfront" about really.

Lord Campbell found a copy of her real birth certificate... some say an individual not fond of "the lady" led him to it. It's seriously odd to lie about one's real surname as well. If this family of merchants wete so rich and proud, whyever did she assume a different surname? She's been a liar her entire life. That's why people shouldn't believe her. Back home she's known as a stirrer.

by Anonymousreply 8206/15/2020

R80 Settle the fuck down already! If you think she's all that, and a pack of crisps, fine... but don't try to label me as anti-trans... That I am NOT. I simply don't support anything short of FULL DISCLOSURE. I've also used the correct pronouns, so take a valium you sore little tosser!

by Anonymousreply 8306/15/2020

Oh, but you are a transphobe, r83. And your comments prove it.

by Anonymousreply 8406/15/2020

Furthermore R80 STOP, cease and desist the lying that "this poster" does this all the time. NOT TRUE! Anyone can check my posting history. In point of fact, I've been F/F'd innumerable times defending trans people. THAT is a fact. I've referred to CC as a creature, because she is vile, ugly inside and out, and that has nothing to do with whatever genitalia she's in possession of. I don't care whether or not she suffers hormone problems either; it's no excuse for constant criticism and publishing malicious gossip. It's time for a reality check. If you're experiencing hormonal difficulties, that gives you no excuse to sully my character or posting history here.

by Anonymousreply 8506/15/2020

I see LCC as someone like Roseanne Barr or Sinead O’Connor or Courtney Love. They’re entertaining and brutally wield the truth. But they’re toxic personalities. I enjoy them from a distance, would never want one close to me.

by Anonymousreply 8606/15/2020

Whatever sympathies poster (s) here have for her condition, whatever it should entail, doesn't excuse a life misspent by earning money writing terrible things about others. Even if there's just a kernel of truth in some of her tosh, it's wicked and lowbrow.

She isn't in any place to be judging others. It certainly isn't a respected way to earn a living either. There's much misguided energy behind her fans here. They simply cannot realise people would object to her, because they are blinded by their Meghan obsession. In their eyes, an enemy of Meghan is a friend of theirs. Then, if you dare object, you're "anti-trans". I've blocked this poster before, yet I suspect she/he has multiple accounts.

by Anonymousreply 8706/15/2020

No, r87, you called her a "creature" because she was born with a genital deformity.

You are obviously a not only a transphobe, but also intensely bigoted, and we have the receipts to prove it in the form of your comment history.

by Anonymousreply 8806/15/2020

Why are there so many outspoken transphobes among the pro-Meghan Markle community?

by Anonymousreply 8906/16/2020

Listen, the fact that Campbell is Jamaican allows her to cut through Markle’s racism bullshit. Campbell has a unique power when it comes to debunking Markle’s endless lying narratives.

by Anonymousreply 9006/16/2020

I really enjoy her candor.

by Anonymousreply 9106/16/2020

R72 I'm going to guess you read a different book and thought it was one of Lady C's. The books totally have Charles cheating in them, it even has the bit where he was almost caught in the act by Dianna in the change rooms after a polo match. I suspect anyone who reads these books and think Lady C is lying are the people who want to pretend Dianna was perfect.

by Anonymousreply 9206/16/2020

R87 Look at you posting that in a gossip forum? What the fuck are you doing on DL if you object to gossip? What are you a pr shill or just a straight woman who wondered in here and doesn't even know it's a gay forum? Leave nobody needs you here.

by Anonymousreply 9306/16/2020

R93 Let others enjoy their opinions of others, though they may be different to your own. We get it, you LOVE "Lady" CC....

I've been here for years, and happen to be the proud owner of a three piece set, so you can get over yourself! I usually avoid these threads because of deranged posters such as yourself! Everything has to be about Markle, doesn't it in your world? I think people ought to be free to speak their minds here on CC, as her name is the title of this thread. Who the fuck are you, one of her press agents? Toss off...

by Anonymousreply 9406/16/2020

Its a liar, a nut and a fame seeking whore.

Pay no attention to it.

by Anonymousreply 9506/16/2020



My typing is awful.

Have at me.

by Anonymousreply 9606/16/2020

R93 You're ridiculous. I didn't even mention Markle and I don't actually give a shit about talking about her. Why are you in this thread if you don't want to talk about gossip? I get why the people who want to defend Meghan, Dianna etc are in here but you make less sense than them because you're feeling superior while doing the same thing you are judging Lady Campbell for doing.

by Anonymousreply 9706/16/2020

R97 Though you responded to your own remarks, I reckon that's for me, so I'll bite the bait: I think she's a creep, and lowbrow. This is a public forum, and no one appointed you as hall monitor.

I don't write books for a living trashing my social betters, and I'm no muckraking liar. This sort of occupation isn't much respected in my culture.

From many of the posts here, I gather more than a few are African Americans with an axe to grind. I recognise the voice of the regular poster I've blocked several times. In Britain, this isn't any sort of lady, and she's rightfully the subject of many good jokes.... DEAL WITH REALITY NOW.

The thread isn't an echo chamber for you to glorify her. I may enjoy reading some gossip now and again as any old poufter does, but I don't create it, and I know my place. This creature pretends to be in the know, and fancies herself part of the [italic] cognoscenti [/italic] .... nothing could be further from truth.

by Anonymousreply 9806/16/2020

Methinks the lady R98 protesteth too much.

It's not an echo chamber to trash her, either. Why not judge the book and its contents when it's released rather than poisoning the well before it can be judged on its merits?

In your ranting you become the thing you're trashing.

by Anonymousreply 9906/16/2020

I won't attempt to argue with any point of view. I've found Lady Colin rather interesting. She seems opinionated, but I don't feel obligated to share her opinions. I'm from another country, and simply find her rather surprising.

by Anonymousreply 10006/16/2020

R98 You called her vile, a creature, alluded to her having a Y chromosome, and called her a muckraker. How exactly are you any different? You doing the same thing but just have a small platform compared to her. I don't care that you called her all that, I don't care that you don't like her. I just find your posts tedious because I just enjoy her gossip and she's actually accurate when it comes to her gossip. I just don't think your posts should put anyone off from listening to her.

It's funny because though you rail at her she'd probably treat you politely and from the little I know of her (like her charity work) I do think she's done more good for this world than your hypocritical ass.

by Anonymousreply 10106/16/2020

R82 It's either Lord Colin Campbell or Lord Colin. Lord Campbell is his father.

by Anonymousreply 10206/16/2020

Whoever is trying to gate crash/troll/enlighten or defend this thread, just know that you've made it intolerably, excruciatingly BORING. Yes, before you ask, I do scroll through as fast as I can.

by Anonymousreply 10306/16/2020

Since the royalty threads seem to have been purged again (and really, what the fuck am I paying for if I can’t access one of my favorite gossip topics?) I’ll just leave this here: I notice Gary Janetti has not posted on Instagram since his black box of last week. What will he do now? He kind of can’t poke Meghan anymore. What happens to his cartoon?

by Anonymousreply 10406/17/2020

And I meant to add, I wonder if Gary will at some point quietly tidy up his feed of anything critical of Meg.

To stay on topic I will say that I am looking forward to lady C’s book. Her Diana one was droll and quite dishy

by Anonymousreply 10506/17/2020

R-104 I'm not familiar with Gary but I had a look at his Instagram, it's funny. Camilla's "cribs" was hilarious.

BTW, two pages of the book which refers to the garden party were leaked online (I won't be linking it for copyright reasons), however, I will say it's not as juicy as expected.

by Anonymousreply 10606/17/2020

It's always confusing when there's a thread about a fun gossip book and some outraged idiots show up to attack it.

On Data Lounge. A website solely about bitchy gossip and displays of cuntitude.

It's like going to a candy shop and sniffing, "Too much sugar...where are the vegetables?"

by Anonymousreply 10706/17/2020

[Quote]notice Gary Janetti has not posted on Instagram since his black box of last week.

Does this have an English equivalent?

by Anonymousreply 10806/17/2020

I think she is fun, though probably abusive in real life. It is hilarious that she won’t surrender her title after a two second marriage to a guy who loathes her and wants nothing to do with her.

by Anonymousreply 10906/17/2020

R108 The BLM black box on Instagram that is just a black screen as a post. It was Gary's last Instagram post. BLM has affected what people can and will post, especially those in media. There is a situation developing which I won't discuss here because off topic but it's serious and is going to blow up. It will affect the BRF and UK media - specifically the RRs and a squad. Allegations of being targeted and the targets being Black.

by Anonymousreply 11006/17/2020

You are, of course correct, r107, but you now live in the world of the Sussexstans, as do we all.

I just got out of 24 hour Datalounge jail, despite being a paying poster who has helped to keep Muriel's light on for years now, because I told a Sussexstan that I disagreed with her/him/they/it.

This is the very first time this has ever happened to me, in all the years (let's be honest - now decades) that I have been posting on DL.

by Anonymousreply 11106/17/2020

There's no DL jail!! Is there?

by Anonymousreply 11206/17/2020

I have known several handsome British women, blonde, tall and tooth like LCC. They are all inbred over there with overly long arms and humped backs.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 11306/17/2020

There is DL jail, r112. They say "You may not post at this time" even though you are a paying customer. You can't like posts either.

They're coming for us all....

by Anonymousreply 11406/17/2020

R113 Her family is half Lebanese with a touch of Syrian, so I wouldn't necessarily say her appearance is typical of most British women... at least English or indigenous British Isles gene pools.

by Anonymousreply 11506/17/2020

Syrian as well as Jamaican? Well then she's even more BAME than I thought, r115!

by Anonymousreply 11606/17/2020

Did anyone read her book about the Queen Mother? Is it worth a read?

by Anonymousreply 11706/18/2020

Love her!

by Anonymousreply 11806/18/2020

Well worth the read, R117, if only to bait the crazies here with tidbits from the book that will have them frothing at the mouth to refute anything and everything she wrote.

Because the Queen Mother was a living saint, you know!

by Anonymousreply 11906/18/2020

she a fukin liar, was born with a deformed cock

by Anonymousreply 12006/18/2020

Most Brits of a certain age deem her highly offensive (especially after she claimed years ago our Queen Mum was the illegitimate daughter of a French cook). Her pomposity is quite amusing however to some.

I think in the current society we live in, people really relish personalities who resemble caricatures.

by Anonymousreply 12106/18/2020

The icing on the cake here is the delightful British custom of using the husband's name ("Colin Campbell") with a female title ("Lady") when a woman marries a man with a title, howsoever briefly.

by Anonymousreply 12206/18/2020

The icing on the cake here is the delightful British custom of using the husband's name ("Colin Campbell") with a female title ("Lady") when a woman marries a man with a title, howsoever briefly.

by Anonymousreply 12306/18/2020

R123 Ha! It is a bit ironic, isn't it? After going through the trouble and expense in changing her name to female, she ends up with a male's name. Years ago The Independent and The Mail took to calling her "Lady Poison Pen"... I quite liked the moniker.

by Anonymousreply 12406/18/2020

I enjoy Lady Campbell

by Anonymousreply 12506/18/2020

That sounds scandalous R125!

by Anonymousreply 12606/18/2020

I love Lady C.

by Anonymousreply 12706/18/2020

R125, What I admire is her blunt candor. The trans issue is one she dealt with pretty directly. I'm not generally a fan of trans issues, but I admire the people who can be direct. Her videos shocked me at first, but I admired her directness. I still do.

by Anonymousreply 12806/19/2020

She isn’t trans. She had a birth defect.

by Anonymousreply 12906/19/2020

"Lady" Colin is a big liar.

The Queen mother was not the daughter of a cook.

That nonsense was made up by Wallis. They called her "cookie".

It was very funny actually. She (Wallis) was a real piece of work. Although she is in the top 5 of people living or dead that I would like to spend an afternoon with.

"Lady" CC has no contact with the royals, just makes stuff up and is dead ass broke.

by Anonymousreply 13006/19/2020

Lady CC lives in a castle! I don’t think she is broke.

by Anonymousreply 13106/19/2020

The "castle" is a moldering and decaying mess.

As is he.

by Anonymousreply 13206/20/2020

She’s hideously wonderful.

by Anonymousreply 13306/20/2020

She lives in a sad little flat with a filthy 1970s kitchenette. I saw a show where she ordered royal butlers for a dinner party. She was extremely rude to them and even the couldn’t help snarking about her.

by Anonymousreply 13406/20/2020

She definitely posts on here. She’s one mean cunt and I love her!

by Anonymousreply 13506/20/2020

R135 I love Datalounge, but there seems to be a delusion here that virtually anyone has heard of it, and that the Russians and various celebrities post here. That is totally insane.

by Anonymousreply 13606/20/2020

R136 I’d bet my life on it that comedians lurk here for material.

by Anonymousreply 13706/20/2020

There have certainly been Russian trolls posting in political threads here, as they're paid to do on various websites—business as usual. It's not out of the question that such a character as Lady Colin Campbell would come here, too. This site may be niche, but it's not completely unknown.

by Anonymousreply 13806/20/2020

I doubt Lady C knows how to operate a computer.

by Anonymousreply 13906/20/2020

R139 but her Croatian bf might!

by Anonymousreply 14006/20/2020

Don't know about Russian trolls, but surely celebrities have anonymous accounts on social media. Don't they want to say shit like everybody else? Wouldn't it be fun to find out who's who?

by Anonymousreply 14106/20/2020

Melania posts here all the time.

Well, she translates the Slovenian into Russian and "Giraffe with One Nut Who Will Kill His Friends at His First Sleepover" Barron translates it from Russian to English.

by Anonymousreply 14206/20/2020

FYI I personally know two comedians who frequent here, two with the initials MC, incidentally, and the other with a dead give away single initial. I’m not being intentionally coy, just protecting their anonymity on an anonymous forum.

by Anonymousreply 14306/20/2020

I know famous people who lurk here. I know of certain media personalities who post here. And I know of PR firms who sit here. Don't underestimate how much this site is known. PR firms have this place on permanent alert. Trolls are also on every gossip site. Gossip is the ideal way to hide agenda driven info that needs to be put out into the mainstream.

by Anonymousreply 14406/20/2020

Some of the PR trolls were hilariously obvious.

by Anonymousreply 14506/20/2020

Meghan has political ambitions according to Lady Colin Campbell. That will go down well at Buck House.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 14606/21/2020

R146 she probably does. Lady C was spot on about Diana in her book that preceded the Morton one.

by Anonymousreply 14706/21/2020

The world has become so insane and terrifying, now I have to worry about MM becoming president. If only her father had punched her hard in the face when she started that dish detergent campaign in childhood. She was quite a homely and sanctimonious little girl too.

by Anonymousreply 14806/21/2020

Those Russian genes are strong and stupid. She should’ve adopted more wisely.

by Anonymousreply 14906/21/2020

In her latest video she was asked whether she had ever met Bob Marley and even though they are both Jamaican I thought it was really random and dumb question. Well I was totally wrong because it turns out she had met him in 1968 and that was even before he became well known.

I haven't finished the video yet but I just have to say how funny and weird it is to imagine them chatting in a room together.

by Anonymousreply 15006/21/2020

She's the most boring woman alive and I can't understand a word she says.

by Anonymousreply 15106/21/2020

Is (s)he a top or bottom? Does (s)he have a cock or pussy?

by Anonymousreply 15206/21/2020


Holy shit.

Watch THIS and....I don't even know WHAT to say

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 15306/21/2020

R152 I know she's got a large stick up her arse, that's for certain!

by Anonymousreply 15406/22/2020

Did she say Markle was in a porn film? What? I thought you guys would be talking about that!

by Anonymousreply 15506/22/2020

She's intentionally not going into Meghan's background, r155. Her book is strictly the story of their relationship and all the drama and fallout surrounding their behaviour as a couple.

by Anonymousreply 15606/22/2020

Just FYI, Lady C's book comes out in two days....

by Anonymousreply 15706/22/2020

R155 the porn film stars a Mexican actress who looks similar to Meghan. But you knew that. That porn film is why certain blogs are now inactive. Investation of a cybercrime. They knew it wasn't Meghan and we're dumb enough to talk about it in private chat. That chat was forwarded on. They then deliberately spread the film " make this go viral ladies" I think were the exact words and stated it was Meghan. That's a crime. Being a middle-aged white woman doesn't get you a free pass in regards to cyber crime of a sexual nature.

by Anonymousreply 15806/22/2020

Amazon only feels the need to discount Lady C's book by 10% or so from the publishers list price. "Finding Freedom" is offered at a third off and it's not out until August.

by Anonymousreply 15906/22/2020

Lady C's book passed one million pre-orders by mid-June. I expect the number is even higher now.

To sell one million books before publishing is not shabby at ALL.

by Anonymousreply 16006/22/2020

R157 Meghan probably has some stunt in mind to try and distract everyone on that day. Though I think a lot of readers are going to go in with unrealistic expectations of what will be in the book. Her books aren't as one sided as the media and the people who've never read them pretend they are. There are going to be some parts where she praises Meghan and Harry.

by Anonymousreply 16106/22/2020

Cindy Adams has a piece in the NY Post on the book saying the new book is legally watertight and that Lady C had loads of high up sources who "Were desperate to talk."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 16206/24/2020

Is the book out in the UK now? Anybody willing to share a few morsels?

by Anonymousreply 16306/25/2020

I am reading the book now. It is really good, really nuanced. 1) Markle DID get a nose job early on; 2) Harry shouted anti Semitic abuse at a boy at Eton; 3) Eton almost certainly helped Harry cheat all the way through; 4) Mariel’s dishwasher detergent foundation myth is a mix of lies and delusions; 5) all the students hated Harry at Eton; 6) Meghan thought of being a diplomat until she flunked the Foreign Service Exam.

That is where I am at so far.

by Anonymousreply 16406/25/2020

R164 - thank you, keep the juicy bits coming as you read along!

by Anonymousreply 16506/25/2020

Thanks r164, we have to wait a month for the book here in the US.

by Anonymousreply 16606/25/2020

This book deserves to sell more copies than the Bible. Campbell’s book is a huge humiliation of MM, slowly but surely spelling out the hopelessness of her acting career for many years. Also, Campbell finally points out at length that Markle is no Meryl Streep and, while pretty, she is no great beauty either. Therefore, Markle would never make it big, and her very limited career is all down to sheer brazenness. But it is wonderful to read about the vast discrepancy between the inflated views MM has of herself and how everyone else sees her pre-Harry (as a nobody with no talent).

My fave revelation is that MM’s favourite word was “classy”, which she used constantly, particularly in relation to herself.

Oh, and Thomas paid for her university and part of her first wedding in Jamaica.

by Anonymousreply 16706/25/2020

The word "classy" is never, ever used even by the Proles, much less by the aristocracy in Britain, it is considered so cringe. It is the ultimate "Non-U" word.

by Anonymousreply 16806/25/2020

Campbell confirms that Thomas paid for Sparkles entire education, had a heart attack and could not travel to the wedding, and was never contacted by the Harkles around that time. All these things are counter to the Harkle party line.

by Anonymousreply 16906/25/2020

R117 Her book about the 👑 mother was deliciously bitchy! Fun read.

by Anonymousreply 17006/25/2020

Her book about the Queen Mother also stated, as fact, that her mother was really the Bowes-Lyon cook, which is patently untrue to anyone with a working pair of eyes.

by Anonymousreply 17106/25/2020

R171 with lack of DNA evidence, how are we to know?

by Anonymousreply 17206/25/2020

Oh come on.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 17306/25/2020

About as non-u as using the word “cringe” as an adjective, R168.

by Anonymousreply 17406/25/2020

I've seen Lady Colin as a guest on a number of British talk shows, and have always been impressed by her plain-speaking quality.

by Anonymousreply 17506/25/2020

Look, I won’t speak for the Queen Mother book, but there is nothing in the Markle book that is in any way inconsistent with the commonly known facts about her. It isn’t bullshit. Campbell said it was gone over with a fine tooth comb, precisely because Markle is the type to sue.

by Anonymousreply 17606/25/2020

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about, r174, so please stop pretending.

by Anonymousreply 17706/25/2020

Nice try, R177, but we both know that I’m correct.

by Anonymousreply 17806/25/2020

The excerpts I have seen online today are DEVASTATING.

by Anonymousreply 17906/25/2020

The trolls have fucked up big time. They bombarded a site to the point that it had to go into protected tweet mode. My source has been 100 percent correct on all info given. They are media based. The backlash I have been told is going to be huge. Very legal and what the trolls did has allegedly opened some eyes to how dangerous some of those women are. One person was all caps screaming some very incriminating stuff with her blog linked to her profile. They have fucked themselves and can't blame anyone else.

by Anonymousreply 18006/25/2020

r180: Try that again - this time perhaps in English?

by Anonymousreply 18106/25/2020

R180: still crazy after all these posts.

Take your meds, hon.

by Anonymousreply 18206/25/2020

[quote] Lady C was born intersexed as we call it today. She was born with fused labia and deformed clitirous that in an infant would look fairly close to a penis and testicles

No he wasn't born that way. Stop the nonsense of the "fused labia". It's all a big fat lie. Because even with a fused labia, no one can miss a VAGINA

a VAGINA is the first hint that a girl is a girl. And this bitch didn't have one when they were born

by Anonymousreply 18306/25/2020

They? She's more than one?

by Anonymousreply 18406/25/2020

[quote] Campbell confirms that Thomas paid for Sparkles entire education, had a heart attack and could not travel to the wedding, and was never contacted by the Harkles around that time. All these things are counter to the Harkle party line.

You know that's a lie? Don't you? Their texts were released in their lawsuit. thomas is a liar. They contacted him numerous times. He didn't reply because he was more interested in making money from cooperating with the tabloids

by Anonymousreply 18506/25/2020

The texts were sent when he was in the hospital, after his heart attack. They are written in a way that it’s clear they knew the texts would become public at some time.

by Anonymousreply 18606/25/2020

[quote] Markle DID get a nose job early on

To be fair, who hasn’t?

by Anonymousreply 18706/25/2020

This book is one of my favourite books of all time. I beg everyone to buy it. MM is in a porn movie. How do you find it? By Googling “Meghan Markle porn”. I saw the video and I am pretty sure it is her. She has one of those disgusting dangling navel piercings.

by Anonymousreply 18806/25/2020

LCC says that her sources tell her that the Queen was so enthused about Meghan's mixed race heritage that it was the deciding factor in the family not only allowing for the union but giving the couple a huge wedding.

LCC says the source said that, had Meghan been a white actress from L.A., the union would never have been allowed to go ahead.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 18906/25/2020

Some posters have already outlined what is in the book. I am up to the part where after they had just got married.

To add to other posts; there were reservations about actress' suitability to royal life - apparently, Philip said to Harry "One steps out with actresses, they do not marry them" but they hoped it would work out and the Queen thought Meghan would be a good thing for the family and helped in relations with the commonwealth. They liked her, particularly Charles, who gave her the nickname 'Tungsten'. She was welcomed and the Queen broke some protocol by allowing a fiancee to spend Christmas with the family for the first time. The book also states that Harry threw his weight around and alienated a lot of people in the quest for what 'Meghan wants, Meghan gets' and where he could have been helping her with the royal protocol and easing her into the fold. Instead, he backed her up when she made demands or refused to follow protocol i.e Meghan refused to wear a hat when asked for Trooping the Colour and wearing an off the shoulder dress, amongst other times she broke protocol. The book also mentions tiara-gate and spraying the church.

Also, some bits about Diana's parenting was very interesting, how she did not discipline the children well, particularly Harry, who was very spoiled and arrogant and disliked at Eton, as mentioned by another poster. Her motto was "Do what you want but do not get caught". Although Lady C does reveal a lot of stuff she does praise both H & M on their accomplishments, for example the military and the charitable things Harry has done. She is very complimentary about Doria. She also mentions that Thomas does indeed have receipts for when he paid for Meghan's education. In fact, she says Thomas doted on Meghan and perhaps spoiled her too much, the rules were more relaxed in his home.

by Anonymousreply 19006/26/2020

^^Also, although it is a Diana tidbit, which people may already know, I did not. Diana thought Charles was in love with Tiggy Legge Bourke and Camilla was a decoy. She spread a rumour that Tiggy, whose husband complained to the Queen and Diana was forced to apologise. Sorry, I know this is about H And M, I just thought it was rather juicy.

by Anonymousreply 19106/26/2020

The more fascinating story is, er "Prince" Leo.

His Linkedin CV alone is quite an interesting piece of work.

Perhaps some of DL HR dragons may want to cast a cold eye over it and report back.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19206/26/2020

Markle was not allowed to attend the exit meeting at Sandringham; Harry tried to get the Queen alone to talk beforehand but was rebuffed; William was the strongman in the decision to refuse the ridiculous half in half out scheme.

by Anonymousreply 19306/26/2020

[quote] The texts were sent when he was in the hospital, after his heart attack. They are written in a way that it’s clear they knew the texts would become public at some time

So what? That doesn't negate the fact that they sent him all those texts and called him repeatedly.

He chose to ignore them and cooperate with the tabloids for money by lying and saying his daughter didn't contact him.

by Anonymousreply 19406/26/2020

The only people who claim they texted and called him are the Harkles. They submitted "evidence" to the papers but not to the lawyers in the Mail case.

Tells me they're going to drop the Mail case before long.

The excerpts from the book are unbelievably juicy.

by Anonymousreply 19506/26/2020

Merely a lame way to make a thread about MM and Harry. “Ladyboy” Campbell should keep her intersexed mouth shut.

by Anonymousreply 19606/26/2020

The thread is about a woman who just wrote an explosive book on Meghan and Harry, r196, but this thread is not supposed to mention Meghan or Harry, or the book that was just published YESTERDAY?


by Anonymousreply 19706/26/2020

By the way, r196. Perhaps a board dedicated to LGBT voices is not the place to exhibit your bigotry towards those who are born different.

Perhaps you would be happier somewhere more suited to your bigotry, such as CB?

by Anonymousreply 19806/26/2020

He didn’t choose to ignore them, r194. He was in the hospital. He answered when released.

The messages were self serving, written for an audience other than Thomas Markle.

by Anonymousreply 19906/26/2020

I’m a bigot and you trash MM at every opportunity? Wow. Pot.Kettle.Black. Karens are alive and well on the other side of the pond, and they’re racist cunts also. R197 & R198 are proof.

by Anonymousreply 20006/26/2020

Yes dear. You are a bigot. Stop attempting to deflect away from your bigotry by falsely projecting, and go somewhere it is more welcome. Like Stormfront.

by Anonymousreply 20106/26/2020

R195 THE Harkles cannot arbitrarily drop the Mail lawsuit, from what I understand. They would have to go through procedures, and pay the Mail's lawyers.

by Anonymousreply 20206/26/2020

Markle's tea throwing incident was so severe that the assistant quit her job, and received a public apology and glowing reference from BP, plus £250,000. Pretty shocking.

by Anonymousreply 20306/26/2020

[quote] He didn’t choose to ignore them, [R194]. He was in the hospital. He answered when released.

You are lying. He was pictured the next day after he went to the hospital. Mr Heart Attack was photographed buying a bucket of Kentucky Fried Chicken 2 days after his supposed "heart attack". He had his phone with him the entire time. He talked to reporters.

You can not take away from the fact that she and Harry called and texted him REPEATEDLY. He chose to ignore the calls and texts and sell a bunch of lies to the tabloids about his daughter not contacting him. He was lying and trashed his daughter for a few thousand dollars. Money was more important to him

by Anonymousreply 20406/26/2020

Lady Colin Campbell was not born a boy. She was named a boy (George William Ziadie) because the doctors at the time thought she would do better being raised as a boy since at birth, she had a genital malformation (a fused labia and deformed clitoris). Medical advice at the time was to assign her as a male so that she could live what was deemed a normal life.

She was not able to have corrective genital surgery until 1970 when she was 21, when her grandmother discovered what had occurred and gave her the $5,000 she needed. At that time, Ziadie legally changed her name to Georgia Arianna and received a new birth certificate.

She's the dishiest thing ever. But I suspect she sources her books well. She does not seem to like Markle because Lady C can see through bullshit and calls people on it just as she does with Markle. Lady C is now ridiculing Markle after reporting that Markle wants to enter politics and have as one of her causes to address, "systemic racism." As Lady C says, "there is no bandwagon Markle won't jump on."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 20506/26/2020

Nope r204. Thomas Markle released his hospital bill publicly. Harry called him after texts from Meghan when she learned of the heart attack. Those were sent while Markle was still hospitalized. Harry berated Markle, saying he wouldn’t have been hospitalized had he listened to Harry.

I also find it strangely coincidental that the photographer who photographed Thomas Markle for the tabloid story is one Meghan Markle had worked with several times in the past.

by Anonymousreply 20606/26/2020

R206 There are no coincidences.

by Anonymousreply 20706/26/2020

It's not that the anti-trans contingent conflating congenital anomalies in biological females with transgendered people are stinking up the thread.

It's that they equate both trans people and people with biological congenital anomalies with being bad people, horrible people or evil people.

This kind of trumpistic hate speech is just that. It serves no humor, no elucidation and no sense. It's just anonymous bullying.

Cowards, shut up.

by Anonymousreply 20806/26/2020

All I know is that it has never once occurred to me to criticise someone for the way they were born.

But the Megstan on here is positively screeching that LCC ought to be rejected based on the way she was born.

It's bigotry, plain and simple.

by Anonymousreply 20906/26/2020

OMIGOD. Reading Lady Colin Campbell. Meghan got some major aristo woman to call Lady Colin and say the reason she ended the relationship with her father is because he molested her. LCC totally did not believe it because of MM’s previous fond memories of her father on her blog.

Does anybody believe it?

by Anonymousreply 21006/26/2020

Not for a nanosecond, r210. You're telling me that a woman waits until her late thirties and her third marriage to finally "Reveal" that her father, with whom she had remained close all the years prior, had molested her?

Stinks of "Harry! I know I told you I had no family, and I'm sorry I lied, but it WASN'T because I was hiding my family and history from you! It's because (SOB) I'm a VICTIMMMM."

So predictable from the malignant narcissist.

by Anonymousreply 21106/26/2020

Snark on delusional trannies all you want but being an asshole about intersexed people who are literally BORN that way is pretty despicable.

As for this book, I'm beside myself with anticipatory glee at the thought of reading it!!!

by Anonymousreply 21206/27/2020

All the Megstans are gleefully dragging Lady C for the way she was born. Just go see on CB. They're all bigots.

by Anonymousreply 21306/27/2020

I too have been reprimanded by the no-cringe troll at R174. Pet peeve of his. Can’t wait for the book.

by Anonymousreply 21406/27/2020

So Harry IS a stupid, befuddled, pussy-whipped drunk after all.

And who cares about Markle, except as someone who will be remembered as Harry's first huge mistake in a life-long journey of shameful embarrassment, and as the control-freak mother of a child who could have had a better life if not for coming out of ol' abortion hole?

The kids likely will OD in his teens, after all, and end up cremated in California and carried around in Markle's valise for sympathy.

by Anonymousreply 21506/27/2020

R214 it’s R174 here. Rather than “no-cringe troll” I prefer to be known as “person who knows the basics of English grammar”.

But I assume that that’s a bit “cringe” for you.

by Anonymousreply 21606/27/2020

Meghan's snatch isn't so much an "abortion hole" as a "money hole", r215

She and her snatch will slither away from this as Very Rich, all while clutching their insurance policy Archie between their overly-veneered teeth.

by Anonymousreply 21706/27/2020

R210 I don't believe it. I'm estranged from my parents and I know several people who have cut out their parents for very good reasons and none of them have acted the way Meghan did. She was so profuse with her praise of her father until the moment it wasn't to her advantage to talk positively about him anymore. I think Lady C is accurate when she says that the reason Meghan doesn't want her father to spend any time with Harry is because of how many lies she told Harry about her childhood and about who paid her uni fees.

I just finished the book and my favorite thing about it was how by the end the book Lady C stops sugarcoating how dim Harry is. It's too bad the book doesn't go into detail on why he finally left the army, I really want to know for sure if did leave because he didn't want to do the tests required to advance further.

by Anonymousreply 21806/28/2020

I think it is monstrous of MM to make such an accusation about her father. While it's true that many victims of familial sexual abuse keep it secret out of shame and pride, if untrue, this allegation is about as low as you can get. If she hasn't completely broken his heart by now, this will do it. I don't think LCC should have published it.

by Anonymousreply 21906/28/2020

I think it is monstrous of MM to make such an accusation about her father. While it's true that many victims of familial sexual abuse keep it secret out of shame and pride, if untrue, this allegation is about as low as you can get. If she hasn't completely broken his heart by now, this will do it. I don't think LCC should have published it.

by Anonymousreply 22006/28/2020

One day, Markle desperately wants the father to appear at the wedding. He has a heart attack and can’t make it and within 48-72 hrs, she cuts him off and never speaks to him again. She wasn’t molested. She has just been in a cold rage ever since that he embarrassed her.

Oh, and the father had all the receipts for her university education. Markle flatly, factually lied about this to her Commonwealth audience when on tour.

by Anonymousreply 22106/29/2020

It must be irritating for her ex-husband to be constantly seeing ‘his’ name in the media.

by Anonymousreply 22206/29/2020

Any links to details in the book?

by Anonymousreply 22306/29/2020

I'm surprised the Daily Mail didn't buy the rights to serialize some excerpts like so many biographies.

by Anonymousreply 22406/29/2020

Any links to excerpts?

by Anonymousreply 22507/09/2020

Oh do fuck off, R1.

by Anonymousreply 22607/09/2020

In her latest video interview, she called Lee Radziwill "a cow". hahaha

by Anonymousreply 22707/19/2020

Fused labia

Fused labia

Fused labia

Fused labia

Fused labia

Fused labia

by Anonymousreply 22807/19/2020

^^^^Oh Meghan, sweetie- are you drunk???

by Anonymousreply 22907/19/2020

She states her boundaries, DL!!! And within those boundaries, is very entertaining.

Her scorched earth takedown of Princess Michael in one of the vids is hilarious –– "THAT said, I think she's a VERY professional princess."

You have to hand it to her: she's made a great success of her life on the back of her own sweat. She lives in a castle, FFS.

by Anonymousreply 23007/20/2020

lol, in the latest video she also called the Empress Alexandra ‘a cow of a wife’, when asked about the Romanovs

by Anonymousreply 23107/20/2020

Lady Campbell's sons, they're adopted? Which means they cannot get any titles of their own? How does that work?

by Anonymousreply 23207/20/2020

Yes r232, the Russian boys are not entitled to a title.

by Anonymousreply 23307/20/2020

So, any Lady CC comments yet about Bea's wedding?

by Anonymousreply 23407/20/2020

R234 you can always leave a question in her latest video. But I would assume that Lady C would approve of this wedding, especially considering the times we find ourselves in.

by Anonymousreply 23507/20/2020

R232 She has no hereditary title to pass on to her sons. With very few exceptions titles pass down through men not women. And Lady Colin is only Lady Colin because she was very briefly married to Lord Colin Campbell.

by Anonymousreply 23607/20/2020

Very, very briefly. Sir Colin sobered up.

As for the "castle", it's a falling down pile that she tries to rent out for occasions.

She has no connections within the Royal Family. She's like Kitty Kelley but not as clever or as well researched.

by Anonymousreply 23707/20/2020

R237 she’s actually rather well informed if you listen to her videos on YouTube. I know you hate her but she’s not stupid.

by Anonymousreply 23807/21/2020

[quote] She has no connections within the Royal Family

Within, true. She does have many connections within the orbit of the Royal Family. She's been good friends for many years with several cousins and some nieces of Prince Philip. She knows several Bowes-Lyon descendants. She is informed and often embellishes, but her base of information in most things is usually solid.

[quote] Lady Campbell's sons, they're adopted?

She is not "Lady Campbell". She's Lady COLIN Campbell or Lady Colin, taking the title and rank of her husband/ex-husband. If she had ever remarried, she would have lost the title. I don't think she's cared about the title for many years, other than it makes her ex-husband's family furious that she uses it and she delights in that aspect. She DOES care about the rank she still enjoys in British society. As a (former) wife of the younger son of a duke, in the official rolls of precedence, she outranks Viscountesses, Baronesses, and the daughters of Earls, Viscounts, and Barons.

by Anonymousreply 23907/21/2020

I don't hate her r238 but I take everything she says with a grain of salt.

And r239, her "connections" are repeating 2nd and 3rd hand gossip. The core of the Royal Family is very, very private. Distant cousins , or even first cousins, are not part of the inner circle. The family is famously tight lipped. That's why Charles and Dianas' reveals were such a shock.

"Lady" Colin needs to sell books to eat. She'll print anything that will sell.

by Anonymousreply 24007/21/2020

I love that, R239. You can be married to the younger son of a duke for barely a year and, on the strength of that misadventure alone, go on for a half century outranking actual noblewomen. Rule Britannia!

by Anonymousreply 24107/21/2020

[quote]The core of the Royal Family is very, very private.

Oh for fuck's sake! Clearly you've never lived in London, or socialised there. All the extended family talk. And every fucking bum burgling servant talks their heads off. They talk about nothing else! In upper and trash circles every last fucking detail is known right down to the last centimetre of Prince Philip's cock. It's always been the case.

by Anonymousreply 24207/26/2020

Well then - spill, R242. Show us what you’ve got.

by Anonymousreply 24307/26/2020

Nobody knows if she has a dick or a snatch.

Quite simian in appearance too.

And as for that sing-song voice.......

by Anonymousreply 24407/26/2020

The lowdown from her ex

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 24507/26/2020

And her take on him

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 24607/26/2020

Goodness, r242: you sure know the trash circles in London well.

by Anonymousreply 24707/26/2020

People seem to really like her or they hate her guts with nothing in between.

I've noticed that any questions on her videos about "Prince" Leo's sexual preferences, no matter how kindly or tactfully posed are always promptly deleted. He must be straight or heavily closeted.

by Anonymousreply 24807/26/2020

R246 He probably did marry her for her money. Her family had a lot more than his. The Dukes of Argyll in recent generations were land rich, but cash poor. Colin Campbell drank away what little inheritance he had.

by Anonymousreply 24907/26/2020

They're all pretty awful but she is by far the worst.

She's a liar, embellishes backstairs gossip heard third hand and pretends to be some sort of insider.

She basically makes stuff up so she can eat and maintain that ruin of a "castle".

by Anonymousreply 25007/26/2020

She’s everything a DLer should be and more!

by Anonymousreply 25107/27/2020

R250 always has such lovely things to say about Lady C. Makes me wonder what the back story is there... is that you Lord Colin???

by Anonymousreply 25207/27/2020

She’s one desperate Cunt.

by Anonymousreply 25307/27/2020

Everything I posted is true r250.

Prove me wrong.

by Anonymousreply 25407/27/2020

As long as she continues to slam Meghan and Harry, she's okay in my books.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 25507/27/2020

It’s a good thing that they couldn’t have kids together. That is a bunch of world class fug. He’s almost as scary looking as she is. Woof.

by Anonymousreply 25607/28/2020

Always a lady!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 25707/28/2020

Hahahahaha r257.

by Anonymousreply 25807/28/2020


Defend that.

by Anonymousreply 25907/28/2020

Why are you so invested in trashing her, R259?

by Anonymousreply 26007/28/2020

I think we all know why. Her said mean things about Princess Sparkles. Boo hoo

by Anonymousreply 26107/28/2020

Lady Colin is a walking freak show. She has no business spilling anyone else’s tea like she does.

by Anonymousreply 26207/28/2020

Whatever you think about Lady Colin Campbell, her books are very entertaining.

by Anonymousreply 26307/28/2020

R258 if you enjoyed that performance, here’s her on “I’m a celebrity”. It’s a longer watch but it had me in stitches.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 26407/28/2020

No interest in Sparkle, the gargoyle gets under my skin.

Starting with her spreading that lie about the Queen Mother being the daughter of a cook. It's in her book.

And if you've been reading the thread r260, I'm hardly the most critical of her.

Now back to your multiple cats.

by Anonymousreply 26507/28/2020

R255 You're that angry over the Queen mother book? Or is it the Diana biography that bothers you so much? From your posts it doesn't sound like you've actually read the books yourself.

by Anonymousreply 26607/29/2020

R266, she’s probably Meghan.

by Anonymousreply 26707/29/2020

R266 - I have read all of Lady Colin Campbell's books. The rumors about the Queen Mother are presented as just that; rumors that been circulating around the British Aristocracy for 50 years at the time the Campbell book on the Queen Mother was written.

by Anonymousreply 26807/29/2020

Correct r268, the rumor was allegedly started by the Wallis Simpson. So quite a long time ago. Lady C didn’t make it up.

by Anonymousreply 26907/29/2020

R269 - Nothing in Lady Colin Campbell's books is made-up. It is all Aristocratic Tea, some hot, some cold, some new, some stale but all very entertaining. Rumors are presented as rumors. Personal info of the author is presented as personal info. One may not care for Lady Colin Campbell as a person but there is nothing wrong with any of her "Royal Gossip" books.

by Anonymousreply 27007/29/2020

I seem to be the only one who has read LCC’s Markle book. It is excellent, and gets into, at great length, why Markle still has an American following and Americans really believe she was driven out of the UK by racists (utterly false). She explains why Americans will be stuck with Markle forever, because they will never really see through her.

by Anonymousreply 27107/30/2020

Prince Leo has moved on to greener pastures and Lady Colin has now teamed up with her fat Russian dim-witted son Misha to co-host her videos.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 27208/08/2020

The show doesn’t work without Leo.

by Anonymousreply 27308/08/2020

She should get her other son Dima to do it with her. He's got more personality and he's brighter than special needs Misha.

by Anonymousreply 27408/08/2020

Leo was as dumb as a rock but at least they had chemistry. This is just SAD.

by Anonymousreply 27508/08/2020

Another unfortunate example of someone having a job because only a relative would hire them.

by Anonymousreply 27608/08/2020

Did she explain the change? Did Leo get tired of being ogled by Lady C? I feel like she should’ve done a farewell interview before foisting her fat mongoloid upon us.

by Anonymousreply 27708/08/2020

Leo said that he was moving on to pursue his career, whatever that is. He seems to want to become some sort of consultant in international affairs. Or maybe he just wanted to spend more time with his boyfriend.

In the penultimate installment before he left, Lady Colin snapped at him on camera for the way he was petting her dog, Mickey. She was quite cranky and for the remainder of the video, Leo seemed quite subdued. Maybe they had a falling out or maybe he just got tired of her treatment.

by Anonymousreply 27808/08/2020

Leo was better than Misha, even if Price Leo presented as mentally slow.

by Anonymousreply 27908/08/2020

Lady CC must be a horror in private.

by Anonymousreply 28008/08/2020

Love how hard she drags Princess Michael of Kent in the Sussex book.

by Anonymousreply 28108/08/2020

Leo is Leo von Breithen Thurn. He's a very handsome and multi-lingual. I actually feel like gushing over him.

by Anonymousreply 28208/08/2020

[quote] Price Leo presented as mentally slow.

His native language is Croatian and didn't learn English until his teens. Some multilingual people never learn to think in other languages. They think in their mother tongue and then translate into whatever other language. I think Leo is like that. He thinks of what he wants to say in Croatian and then converts it to English which makes him seem slow.

by Anonymousreply 28308/08/2020

[quote] Leo is Leo von Breithen Thurn. He's a very handsome and multi-lingual. I actually feel like gushing over him.

Princess Olga Romanoff told Leo he looks like a young Tsar Nicholas II. She also told him if it weren't for the difference in their ages, she'd want him to marry her granddaughter.

by Anonymousreply 28408/08/2020

He most likely didn't get paid.

by Anonymousreply 28508/08/2020

Leo wears a suit and glasses well.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 28608/08/2020

R286, Sorry!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 28708/08/2020

The Markle book is absolutely scathing. I have been disappointed by how few people seem to have read it. It really is worth reading.

by Anonymousreply 28808/08/2020

Does anyone have a link with excerpts? The Scobie book has been widely excerpted, but LCC's book seems to have sunk like a stone.

by Anonymousreply 28908/08/2020

any evidence leo gets blown by lady C on her knees, with the doggy standing near for leftovers?

does he milk her ample elder teats?

by Anonymousreply 29008/09/2020

Would pay for a ticket show where he loads her mouth up with his hot gobs of cum, pinching the shite out of her long nipples.

by Anonymousreply 29108/09/2020

Leo was visiting Goring when the lockdown hit, so he was stuck there and they came up with the youtube show as a way to promote the book during lockdown.

Lockdown in Britain is largely over, so he went back to his life.

by Anonymousreply 29208/10/2020

Lady C has girly hands. That is one thing that cannot be surgically altered.

by Anonymousreply 29308/10/2020

Her book was a dud. It was more about Diana apparently and was quite boring according to friends.

by Anonymousreply 29408/10/2020

I read it - it was great. A fun read.

by Anonymousreply 29508/10/2020

leo wont be interviewing her any more


by Anonymousreply 29608/10/2020

She really is highly intelligent. Her book destroys MM, but no one seems to be reading it.

by Anonymousreply 29708/10/2020

She really is highly intelligent. Her book destroys MM, but no one seems to be reading it.

by Anonymousreply 29808/10/2020

any photos of leo nekkid?

by Anonymousreply 29908/10/2020

Why do you say no one is reading it? It was released in UK several weeks ago and more recently here. She is avidly promoting it and parts of it have been enjoyed on a few forums I've seen. I think she'll do well.

by Anonymousreply 30008/10/2020

Misha seems less interested in her stories than the bottom was.

by Anonymousreply 30108/10/2020

[quote] Misha seems less interested in her stories than the bottom was.

Probably because Mummy forced him to do it at the last minute.

by Anonymousreply 30208/10/2020

R298 It sold well so of course people have read it. Are you judging whether people have read it based on DL comments? I read it and found it extremely interesting but I didn't post about it much.

by Anonymousreply 30308/10/2020

Someone just started a new thread regarding her comments about Princess Michael, so it's not like there's no attention, but the tabloids are having a field day with the Scobie/Durand book. And, sadly, Leo is no longer the producer for Lady C's Youtube channel. I admit he was the main reason I was watching,

by Anonymousreply 30408/10/2020

R304 Leo was the only reason I watched too. He reminded my of an ex-boyfriend of me who was cute, dumb as rocks, but soooo good in bed. I hope some nude pics of Leo and his uncut cock leak online at some point.

by Anonymousreply 30508/11/2020

R288 - I bought it and read it.

by Anonymousreply 30608/11/2020

R294 - The book is NOT a dud.

by Anonymousreply 30708/11/2020

[quote] I hope some nude pics of Leo and his uncut cock leak online at some point.

What makes you think it's uncut?

by Anonymousreply 30808/11/2020

If he’s Eastern European and neither a Muslim nor a Jew, he is uncut.

by Anonymousreply 30908/12/2020

R294. Yes it is. It took one week and now it's off the radar. The reviews are average to below average and even the blog nutters admitted that it wasn't as good as what they thought. It is what it is. A dud

by Anonymousreply 31008/12/2020

R308 Less than 20% of Europeans born after 1970 are cut. Added to that, Eastern Europe (where Leo is from) circumcision is virtually nonexistent outside of Jewish and Muslim populations.

by Anonymousreply 31108/12/2020

Misha and Mummy are back with another video.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 31208/12/2020

Misha has a gut and man-tits.

by Anonymousreply 31308/12/2020

R310 - If you are a Sussex hater, you will love the book.

by Anonymousreply 31408/12/2020

oh i love man tittys, and he likes em sucked off long and hard, the nip tips to be bitten and gnawed on like cherries.


by Anonymousreply 31508/12/2020

Lady C. and Misha with the pretty blue eyes discuss the mental illness of Harry M-W and Meghan's narcissism. And do the Sussexes need a mortgage?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 31608/15/2020

The Fat Russian son is sweating like a pig.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 31708/19/2020

"Lady" Colin is living in a crumbling old pile and her latest book is a flop.

Perhaps she could get a mortgage.

by Anonymousreply 31808/19/2020

The book is not a flop. Cheers Lady C!

by Anonymousreply 31908/20/2020

Whatever you think of her, good or bad, this entire video is devoted to narcissism and her narcissist mother, and it's really very interesting. A lot of what she has to say in it probably hits home with many of us.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 32008/22/2020

She is a pedo apologist. That says more about her than anything else. And she knows that a vast proportion of Sussex haters love the narc topic. So she gains sympathy and fans by gaining a rapport. Laying out her own narc experiences. The anti Sussex nutters are known to be very easy to manipulate. Backroom media chatter always talks about it. They believe tabloid articles and blinds. It's no coincidence that she directly contacted blind gossip and had a discussion with the owners. People love the antisussex nutters because they are known as an easy mark.

by Anonymousreply 32108/22/2020

Wasn't the "pedo-aplogism" her correcting Piers Morgan's terminology?

by Anonymousreply 32208/22/2020

It looks like the Meghan trolls are all worked up about something today.

by Anonymousreply 32308/22/2020

[quote] Wasn't the "pedo-aplogism" her correcting Piers Morgan's terminology?

Yes. I think she explained the correct term for Andrew, which she made clear was just as reprehensible, but that calling him a pedo was inaccurate. Many viewers freaked out thinking she was making excuses for Andrew and she said afterward that she definitely was not. She got fed up with the abuse that she generally refuses to discuss it now, which just makes people think she was excusing Andrew when in actuality, she gave up trying to explain to stupid people the difference. She shouldn't have bothered in the first place and just let Piers call Andrew a pedo and be done with it.

by Anonymousreply 32408/22/2020

R324, I agree, and I agree with her attempt to bypass the tabloid terminology that seems to be the preferred usage when discussing the issue.

by Anonymousreply 32508/22/2020

R324 she gave up trying to explain to stupid people. That kind of sums up the condescension that makes these threads sit wrong. There is always an underlying we know best, what we think is right, if you don't agree you are a bot, Markle troll vibe. You Karen the fuck out of these threads and it keeps getting your threads greyed out.

by Anonymousreply 32608/22/2020

She's both interesting and ridiculous.

What's not to like, from a great distance?

by Anonymousreply 32708/22/2020

R324 That sort of misunderstanding between her and journalists have happened a few times. It's annoying when she's using proper English but they misunderstand her because their own comprehension skills are lacking. Or when they misconstrue her on purpose to get a controversial headline.

Hearing her talk on her youtube channel makes me realise how dumbed down most tv is.

by Anonymousreply 32808/23/2020

The new episode of her YouTube show should be required viewing for all DLers. Her reading of Megan and Harry along with the “authorized” biography that just came out is, in a word, epic. Her acidic takedown is so delicious I’m actually rewatching the whole thing as I type. She’s so eloquent and truly the patron saint of cunts, heavens bless her. And the Marks apologists/trolls/whatever (here and elsewhere) can fuck off.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 32909/05/2020

I find the episodes with the emphasis on Meghan to be the most boring.

by Anonymousreply 33009/05/2020

Me too, R330, but this one is especially nasty and vicious. It gets really good when she gets into Harry needed to grow up and get over Diana’s death through therapy (around 15 mins in).

by Anonymousreply 33109/05/2020

She outcunts Princess Michael of Kent who she even relentlessly trashed for 20 minutes in a recent video. She called her a vain, pompous, unpopular social climber. Of course it was all projection.

by Anonymousreply 33209/05/2020

She said Meghan's civil rights activism is fake because she never had intercourse with a black man in her life and also because she successfully passed as white for most of her life.

by Anonymousreply 33309/05/2020

All of Meghan's "activism" has been fake, her feminism is fake. Anything she has ever done she has done to further her failed acting career and famewhoring life.

by Anonymousreply 33409/05/2020

Georgie believes in tell us how she really feels.

by Anonymousreply 33509/05/2020

So Andrews in the tabloids again today.

by Anonymousreply 33609/05/2020

Well what's he done now, r336?

by Anonymousreply 33709/05/2020

Trashing Meghan keeps folks from focusing on Prince of Perverts. Give me one MM over ten Prince Andrews. Fucking sleaze.

by Anonymousreply 33809/06/2020

R333 must be white. Only a white person with all the privilege in the world would presume to know what a black person is and has gone through. Meghan is BLACK, you racist POS. She looks black because she is. What she chooses to do and whom she chooses to date is another story, but there is no effing way she walks into an audition with people who then say... “oh, a white girl with a tan.”

by Anonymousreply 33909/06/2020

Lady C’s first and most epic takedown of Princess Michael of Kent is here starting around 18 mins in... brutal isn’t even the word!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 34009/07/2020

I much prefer Leo with the hairy chest over the fat Russian.

by Anonymousreply 34109/07/2020

That son of hers just stares at her like a wax about the fucking mannequin challenge! He’s cool when he speaks but when she’s speaking he just looks at her motionless for as long as she’s really odd and funny!

by Anonymousreply 34209/07/2020

She’s a fucking freak. An argument for involuntary euthanasia.

by Anonymousreply 34309/07/2020

R329 that green outfit first of all was everything! I found the stuff she discussed about Diana’s accident to be very interesting..she mentions talking to the journalists that were in the tunnel!! If you’re a fan of her’s you should check out the documentary of her renovation of Castle Goring. I wonder to what extent Leo contributed to the growth of her YouTube channel.

by Anonymousreply 34409/07/2020

Rather obstreperous clit

by Anonymousreply 34509/07/2020

She's patron saint of the Datalounge.

by Anonymousreply 34609/08/2020

She's the patron saint of the daily mail readers.

by Anonymousreply 34709/08/2020

Well, my gob is smacked... I watched the above youtube clip, expecting Baby Jane Hudson, Courtney Love, and Nurse Ratched. What I saw was a well spoken (no um, er, oh) lady who presents herself as confident, and a bit self deprecating. Her comments about members of the Royal family seem to be correct, judging on my knowledge of them.

I'm not going down a rabbit hole to troll everything about her, but I would've switched it off if I found her full of artifice.

by Anonymousreply 34809/08/2020

I think she's unpleasant. Very full of herself, and what is it she does to be so proud of? She ferrets out dirt on other people for money and attention. Yes, we all have to make a living, and for those who want to retain a royal family, MM is an outrageous unmitigated disaster. I would read LCC's book, as it is apparently well-researched, but her videos are very off-putting.

by Anonymousreply 34909/08/2020

R349 - Lady Colin Campbell's books are well researched and she is very well connected. Georgia Arianna Ziadie is one of those Brits that everyone likes but no one admits they are close friends with because they are worried what others of their set may think. Interestingly enough, Lady C really does not care because she knows the score and plays the game as the pro she is..

However, her books are VERY opinionated as she is devout monarchist and a class-behavior snob to some degree..

by Anonymousreply 35009/09/2020

I'm starting to like Misha as long as I keep my eyes above where his tits start to sag.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35109/10/2020

“Lady” Campbell does have somewhat masculine features. After her surgery, did she discover that she was infertile? The corrective surgery didn’t make her able to bear children?

by Anonymousreply 35209/11/2020

Lady Colin Campbell continues throwing shade at the Duke and Duchess of Netflix.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35309/12/2020

At Home With Hayley , visiting Lady Colin Campbell.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35409/13/2020

Look at those heavy brows and square shoulders.

MAN I feel like a woman.

by Anonymousreply 35509/13/2020

The Sussex sign with Netflix. Netflix now becomes a target. Everybody knows it. The big difference this time is the blogs were dumb enough to state they were going to start a boycott of Netflix because they signed the Sussex. They then proceeded to on LSA their blogs and Twitter start that boycott. Cuties was the convenient excuse. Defamation is serious. They know their multiple identities on different platforms even down to who they are on dlisted and I wouldn't be surprised if something is going to be done about it. Lady Campbells opinions aren't informed. They just mirror the audiences opinion. It's how you get clicks.

by Anonymousreply 35609/13/2020

She’s a vile racist cunt who cannot except her own racial mixing.

by Anonymousreply 35709/13/2020

*Hands R357 a dictionary*

by Anonymousreply 35809/13/2020

Please keep discussions about LSA over on that chat site. Anyone interested in that forum can head over there if they feel the need. This thread is about Lady C and her observations: there's already an active thread about the Harkles' Netflix deal.

by Anonymousreply 35909/13/2020

This is datalounge not tumbler. Dataloungers post their own thoughts. It isn't collective group think here. I posted about Netflix because that is lady Campbells latest talking point. Netflix. But like every Brf thread only positive comments seemed to be allowed. Funny that.

by Anonymousreply 36009/13/2020

R 358 apologies- Mr. Autocorrect has ia mind I’d his own.own ideas. If I could lay my hands on him I’d give him a hiding from hell.

by Anonymousreply 36109/13/2020

R357 - "cannot except her own racial mixing."

Oh, dear!

by Anonymousreply 36209/14/2020

Hey, stick-up-the-ass cunt at R359, you may be from "another country" and hover over the royal threads and regale people with your tales of an Estonian who knew a Finn who met a Pole who told a Swede where to purchase herring, but you ain't the fucking Queen Mother Hall Monitor here or anywhere else.

Stop attempting to order people about. If your hormones are off, your potatoes are turning green or your sex life is as rotten as your personality, you waspish twat-snot dripper, it's not our problem and it's not cause for you to act like a Frau of Dortmund. If you want your precious moments at the DL to lack people calling you out for your atrocities against the spirit of the site, drop the act, Princess. And do something about your bad English, too, please. Simpering while illiterate makes you look even more absurd, rumal lits.

That's Estonian for "stupid bitch."

by Anonymousreply 36309/14/2020

Wait, where does a Swede purchase a herring?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 36409/14/2020

Anyone who watches her latest video and claims she is anything less than fantastically bright and stunningly learned is either a Markle troll or an idiot. Sure, she’s a cunt, but Lady C knows her shit!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 365Last Wednesday at 7:49 AM

I had the interesting experience of working as assistant to one of the editors (yes, there are more than one) of the recent HQ release "Finding Freedom". I thought you guys - especially the Crown sympathizers, like r16 - might like to know that while the British Royal Family does occasionally come across rather poorly in the book, there were also definitely bits that, while verified to be true by numerous sources, were in the end kept from the finished draft. This was done mostly at the behest of one of our senior editors, who in addition to being quite old is also conservative.

For instance, it was left out that one of the main reasons Prince Harry and Meghan Markle left the U.K. is the noxious stench that fires from QEII's practically decomposing cunt. There is absolutely no way to remove it (the smell) from any room she's entered. This is one reason Miss Markle wanted to use air fresheners in St. George's Chapel at Windsor the day of her wedding. The Prince had warned Markle what it was like to live with this fetid, all-pervading stink but she had no idea it could be so bad. Ultimately, she felt it was best to raise her child away from the toxic reek, which court doctors still do not understand.

Anyway, ask me any questions if you like. My contract with the publisher's up.

by Anonymousreply 366Last Wednesday at 7:55 AM

How many accounts are you going to make, R366? I've ignored you three times already.

by Anonymousreply 367Last Wednesday at 8:06 AM

R366 - If you want to post the same comment multiple times, go over to the commentariat at the Daily Fail. You will feel right at home.

by Anonymousreply 368Last Wednesday at 8:18 AM

It seems like the comments about every royal are the same, day in and day out, though.

by Anonymousreply 369Last Wednesday at 9:01 AM

She's got really tedious, all of the most recent videos have been drivel about Meghan and Harry.

by Anonymousreply 370Last Wednesday at 1:18 PM

Have any of you lot seen the stuff coming out of Sasha Swire's newly published diariesi, which are being written about as total character assassination of everyone in sight, especially, but not limited to, David Cameron?

The diary sounds most entertaining, and, thankfully, Meghan and Harry came in for their share, with an observation that supports Lady C's:

From the DM's coverage of the publication, which in fact is far more "explosive" than that piece of sodden teacake Meghan's Mouthpiece published:

"Lady Swire's reaction to Prince Harry's engagement to Meghan Markle in 2017 is to predict 'trouble ahead'. The future ­Duchess of Sussex is 'eating the redhead for breakfast', she declares; he is 'clearly not as clever as she is'."

Looks like a tome definitely worth the price.

by Anonymousreply 371Last Thursday at 4:46 AM

[quote] The future ­Duchess of Sussex is 'eating the redhead for breakfast', she declares; he is 'clearly not as clever as she is'."

My doorstop is more clever than Harry.

by Anonymousreply 372Last Thursday at 10:52 AM

All Brit DLers and Euro Trolls, What does "clever" mean in Brit speak?

by Anonymousreply 373Last Thursday at 11:31 AM

R373, it means "bright", "sagacious" or "shrewd", depending on the context. I think that American people say "smart"?

by Anonymousreply 374Last Thursday at 12:01 PM

[quote]Anyone who watches her latest video and claims she is anything less than fantastically bright and stunningly learned is either a Markle troll or an idiot. Sure, she’s a cunt, but Lady C knows her shit!

Oh, please STFU and take your meds. Plus, there's always suicide. For you, not for us. Put us out of YOUR misery.

by Anonymousreply 375Last Friday at 8:41 AM

I like her, R1!

by Anonymousreply 376Last Friday at 8:47 AM

She's a modern day Alice Roosevelt Longworth.

by Anonymousreply 377Last Friday at 11:43 AM

Markle troll at R375. Unhinges much, dear? Do take a sedative or a much needed enema. Unclench.

by Anonymousreply 378Last Friday at 12:51 PM

I think that r378 is the shit that comes out of Lady Campbell’s prolapsed anus.

by Anonymousreply 379Last Friday at 12:54 PM

R378 I love the hypocracy. The antimarkle trolls are deluded racists some of who need psych interventions. One of the biggest players in the antimarkle scene is obsessed. Has over 15 Twitter accounts and is widely praised and retweeted. Her gig is pushing how much of a whore Meghan is and how much of a criminal Doria could be. She is a convicted criminal who pulled a gun on a terrified student half her age over a carpark. Her occupation when she was sentenced in Wales to prison was Brothel manager. Can you see the double standards. Like I said the nutters are known. It is a core group of women. They are stalkers.

by Anonymousreply 380Last Friday at 1:18 PM

I too love the hypocracy.

by Anonymousreply 381Last Friday at 1:47 PM

Hypocracy, hypocrisy...who cares about how it’s spelled at this point...the anti MMers are cunts, kuntz, kkkunts.

by Anonymousreply 382Last Friday at 5:06 PM

I don't know, r382, I mean there are nutjobs and then there are other people, many of whom don't like Meghan Markle. I don't like her and the longer she's around the less I like her.

I found her arrogant, lacking in commitment and a selfish drama-queen. It seemed all she ever did was go on vacation and complain about everything. Nobody wants to listen to a tale of woe from a royal duchess, it's ridiculous and offensive.

With her "destiny" now in America to lead the BLM movement, it should be interesting.

I wonder how Harry's enjoying her "destiny" and his life these days?

by Anonymousreply 383Last Friday at 7:08 PM

I’m sure that some people do dislike her but others have gone off the deep end. Obsessing over her every move and trying to read her mind through the internet.

by Anonymousreply 384Last Friday at 8:01 PM

[quote]r383 I wonder how Harry's enjoying her "destiny" and his life these days?

What did he have going on in the UK? He now has a beautiful wife, a child, freedom from deadening protocol...and all without that boring-ass family breathing down his neck.

by Anonymousreply 385Last Friday at 8:08 PM

Meghan sure thinks highly of herself. Beautiful? Amazing legs?

by Anonymousreply 386Last Friday at 8:16 PM

Oh, I forgot how full of charisma she is. She's full of something alright.

by Anonymousreply 387Last Friday at 8:20 PM

Lady CC's most recent Youtube video was more about "Finding Freedom" aka "Finding Freebies". (I love when she corrects the grammar and informs viewers who is responsible for certain passages based on the grammar and wording.)

According to Lady CC, Sparkle's goal is to be the most famous woman in the world.

And to increase her fame, it was claimed, that Sparkle deliberately pulled all that baloney over her pregnancy, the baby's birth, etc., etc.

Want attention? That got attention, didn't it?

Lady CC was very angry.

by Anonymousreply 388Last Friday at 9:01 PM
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Don't you just LOVE clicking on these things on every single site you visit? I know we do! You can thank the EU parliament for making everyone in the world click on these pointless things while changing absolutely nothing. If you are interested you can take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT and we'll set a dreaded cookie to make it go away. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.


Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!