Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

British Royal Family Gossip: Part 46

Still awaiting the birth of the Sussex baby.

Carry on with your madness.

by Anonymousreply 600May 3, 2019 10:10 PM

Pleeeeeeeeze can we talk about Charles and Di, too!!!

by Anonymousreply 1May 2, 2019 5:46 PM

R1 - videos just for you!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 2May 2, 2019 5:54 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 3May 2, 2019 6:02 PM

R1 and R597 from the other thread: Thanks!

by Anonymousreply 4May 2, 2019 6:02 PM

R3 - You're welcome!

by Anonymousreply 5May 2, 2019 6:04 PM

Prince Harry really is fugtastic these days.

I hope Baby Sussex has olive skin, thick dark wavy hair and intense blue eyes, like Diana.

by Anonymousreply 6May 2, 2019 6:04 PM

It's the May Bank holiday in Britain. Is that a good time to give birth?

by Anonymousreply 7May 2, 2019 6:05 PM

Were there any good times between Charles and Diana during their marriage, or was it all a struggle?

by Anonymousreply 8May 2, 2019 6:05 PM

Worse case scenario for Baby S's looks?

Ginger afro, huge facial freckles, small dark eyes, Harry's nose and jawline.

by Anonymousreply 9May 2, 2019 6:06 PM

Diana said the closest they were was just before Harry was born.

by Anonymousreply 10May 2, 2019 6:07 PM

R7, the actual Bank Holiday is on Monday. NHS hospitals are under funded and under staffed, so why knows?

by Anonymousreply 11May 2, 2019 6:07 PM

Isn't the service for the Royal Victorian Order tomorrow?

by Anonymousreply 12May 2, 2019 6:08 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 13May 2, 2019 6:08 PM

R8, Charles was more educated and intellectual than Diana, but he did find her physically very attractive. Once the shine wore off that, he looked elsewhere.

by Anonymousreply 14May 2, 2019 6:09 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 15May 2, 2019 6:09 PM

Wtf is Kate's stylist wearing on her head? Surely Kate can do her own styling?

by Anonymousreply 16May 2, 2019 6:10 PM

R13 = Lizha

by Anonymousreply 17May 2, 2019 6:10 PM

I predict that when there is an announcement from the parents, the baby's gender will not be mentioned, or presumed.

by Anonymousreply 18May 2, 2019 6:10 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19May 2, 2019 6:11 PM

They baby will have brown eyes but newborn's eyes will change color as they grow older (usually become darker), baby will be fair skinned.

by Anonymousreply 20May 2, 2019 6:11 PM

Is Kate going to ship George off to board at Eton? I can't see Meghan doing that with her sprog.

by Anonymousreply 21May 2, 2019 6:11 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 22May 2, 2019 6:13 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 23May 2, 2019 6:14 PM

'They baby will have brown eyes but newborn's eyes will change color as they grow older (usually become darker), baby will be fair '

Nearly all babies are born with blue eyes. Indigo blue if they're going to be brown. I don't think the blue eyed gene is very strong in Di's boys, or the Cambridge kids would have blue eyes.

by Anonymousreply 24May 2, 2019 6:14 PM

R16 Kate can't do her own styling. Pre princess prep, she was a hot mess. Natasha's styling is boring, but she is one of the best things to happen to Kate (surpassed only by (Carole, William and George)

She does lose points for those silly headbands of course.

by Anonymousreply 25May 2, 2019 6:14 PM

R25, Kate can't do her own photography well either, but here we are.

by Anonymousreply 26May 2, 2019 6:17 PM

I honestly think MM will have extensive procedures before photos, which will be heavily edited and enhanced before release. No authentic pics, and she will likely sell them to the highest bidder.

by Anonymousreply 27May 2, 2019 6:18 PM

R26 - oh do shut up. Kate's photography is fine for an amateur.

by Anonymousreply 28May 2, 2019 6:19 PM

I know Diana studied dance somewhat seriously, but to me she always looked stiff and awkward dancing with Charles. Maybe that was his fault. I so wish we had video of that “uptown girl” dance she did onstage, that made Charles cringe. In retrospect, I can certainly understand his side of it. It was an extraordinary thing for the princess of Wales to do. Imagine if Kate or Meghan did such a thing even today.

Oh, and I wish we had video of her dancing with Travolta. There is a photo of that moment, and it’s remarkable in that the people in the background are mostly not looking at them.

by Anonymousreply 29May 2, 2019 6:25 PM

R28 Kate's photography is sometimes celebrated as if she's doing something amazing. She has a good camera, an amazing team of assistants and all the time in the world with subjects that she knows very well. The images are lovely but not exemplary.

by Anonymousreply 30May 2, 2019 6:26 PM

Meghan could certainly use a stylist and a signature look. I think she would look good in the styles favored by Queen Letizia.

by Anonymousreply 31May 2, 2019 6:28 PM

Oh my god, there are some desperates bashing in the thread already. Well deserved, Natasha Archer. Natasha is lovely, as is her styling. Can't see Heidi BalloonyFace ever receiving such an honour.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 32May 2, 2019 6:32 PM

Meg won't have any procedures if she is breastfeeding, which I'm sure she will be.

She was out and about at 8 or 9 months pregnant, looking huge, so she can't be that vain. I think she'll lose weight quickly, though.

by Anonymousreply 33May 2, 2019 6:32 PM

R32, calm down, Kate Troll!

by Anonymousreply 34May 2, 2019 6:36 PM

I have to admire Diana's love of dance, but it didn't come naturally to her. But she enjoyed it, and that is all that matters.

by Anonymousreply 35May 2, 2019 6:36 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 36May 2, 2019 6:38 PM

' No authentic pics, and she will likely sell them to the highest bidder.'

How many times? The Royals NEVER sell pictures of themselves. You sound utterly uninformed and ridiculous.

by Anonymousreply 37May 2, 2019 6:39 PM

R33 Procedures include injections (botox, fillers, etc...) and are not limited to surgeries. So yes it's likely she'll have botox to her jawline to keep her bulky muscles from coming back. Botox effects on jawlines usually wear off 6-7 months especially if the patient's massetter muscles are very prominent/ strong to begin with, which in MM's case looks likely.

by Anonymousreply 38May 2, 2019 6:41 PM

Peter Phillips and Autumn Kelly did.

by Anonymousreply 39May 2, 2019 6:41 PM

And Zara and Mike have.

by Anonymousreply 40May 2, 2019 6:42 PM

Especially Zara and Peter Phillips never do it, R37.

by Anonymousreply 41May 2, 2019 6:42 PM

Yes Mia's first pictures were sold to Hello.

by Anonymousreply 42May 2, 2019 6:43 PM

R34 why is R32 a Kate troll for linking photo of nasty no-talent "stylist" that Meghan calls best friend?

by Anonymousreply 43May 2, 2019 6:43 PM

R38, you can't have Botox and fillers when breastfeeding. What is the matter with you? Dumb and desperate. Her face looks fine as it is. She has great bone structure.

by Anonymousreply 44May 2, 2019 6:44 PM

Queen Letizia's style probably would be rejected by Meghan as not being high fashion enough. Letizia wears a lot of Zara with more expensive pieces.

by Anonymousreply 45May 2, 2019 6:45 PM

R43, anyone who is OTT praising Stepford is a Kate Troll, Fuglicia.

by Anonymousreply 46May 2, 2019 6:46 PM

Didn't praise Kate, nutty, praised her stylist.

by Anonymousreply 47May 2, 2019 6:47 PM

I still say it's twins (by whatever means) and that's the big "Surprise!" and how she plans to break the internet and get her big buzz and big head lines that will last more than a day or so.

by Anonymousreply 48May 2, 2019 6:48 PM

R44 Honey you're the one who's dumb and desperate defending Meghan's great bone structure. I worked for plastic surgeons as a side job while I was a RN going for my master's. Yes, new moms who BREASTFED got botox and injections all the time. You just have to wait a couple of days before you breastfeed, which the moms do because they have supply of pumped breast milk. Please educate yourself before you make a fool of yourself lecturing others.

by Anonymousreply 49May 2, 2019 6:49 PM

Meghan and Harry will release one picture of Baby Sussex on their IG and that will be it. The Kate fraus here will scream 'fake' and 'photoshop'.

by Anonymousreply 50May 2, 2019 6:50 PM

Just about any royal could aspire to Queen Letizia's look, and the fact that she can achieve it including High Street pieces does her credit. It is rare that she looks anything but elegant, stylish, and appropriate for the occasion.

by Anonymousreply 51May 2, 2019 6:51 PM

To everyone who is insulting four year old Charlotte, will you please go on one of the Sadie Sandler threads?

Charlotte is a lovely and poised young lady.

by Anonymousreply 52May 2, 2019 6:51 PM

R49, she is 37, not 47, and her face looks great now in pictures, so there is no way she'd risk censure by going anywhere near a cosmetic surgeon.

by Anonymousreply 53May 2, 2019 6:52 PM

I think they’ll sell the photos of the baby.

I also think no one will care by then.

Whatever mag buys the photos is going to be left holding the bag.

by Anonymousreply 54May 2, 2019 6:52 PM

'To everyone who is insulting four year old Charlotte, will you please go on one of the Sadie Sandler threads?'

And yet again, the Kate Troll tries to police the thread. The fug is strong in ALL the Cambridge crotch droppings. Not one of them has inherited Kate or Wills' looks.

by Anonymousreply 55May 2, 2019 6:54 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 56May 2, 2019 6:54 PM

R53 I'm talking about botox to her jawlines which gives her face a totally different shape, she looks way better with it than without, and I'm sure she knows it too. Also the no breast-feeding for 2 days was a rathe be too safe than sorry guideline from the offices I'd worked, with botox all you need to do is avoid breastfeeding for about 12 hours. I saw many mommy-makeovers where I used to work.

by Anonymousreply 57May 2, 2019 6:55 PM

R9, yep, if Mother Nature has a sense of humor!

The freckles, naturally will come in a few years.

by Anonymousreply 58May 2, 2019 6:55 PM

'I think they’ll sell the photos of the baby.

I also think no one will care by then.

Whatever mag buys the photos is going to be left holding the bag.'

Why do you keep saying nobody will care? Heghan are a popular couple here and everyone is looking forward to seeing the kid. Multicultural Londoners love Meg.

by Anonymousreply 59May 2, 2019 6:56 PM

Stop calling me a Kate troll.

Damn it.

by Anonymousreply 60May 2, 2019 6:57 PM

R52, you are a foul mouthed poster who.is obsessed with Kate and you like to police the thread - hence, Kate Troll!

by Anonymousreply 61May 2, 2019 6:59 PM

Boring and unnecessary thread.

by Anonymousreply 62May 2, 2019 7:00 PM

R587 from previous thread.

Pippa is a very attractive young woman. To me, however, she does not look English, but American!

She has a sexy 1960s vibe about her.

by Anonymousreply 63May 2, 2019 7:02 PM

Kate, Pippa and Meg all have fabulous figures.

by Anonymousreply 64May 2, 2019 7:03 PM

R61, oh very well.

Although I wasn't policing the thread as much as having a dig at Adam's offspring....but whatever...

by Anonymousreply 65May 2, 2019 7:04 PM

R64, and each has a mole above her lip!

As did Diana!

by Anonymousreply 66May 2, 2019 7:04 PM

R66, Diana's mole, if that is what you want to call it, was absent in most of her USA photos. I only noticed it in European publications, if that is possible.

by Anonymousreply 67May 2, 2019 7:06 PM

Pippa is a stupid name, though.

Kate is much better.

by Anonymousreply 68May 2, 2019 7:08 PM

80 year old Skippy is on a roll.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 69May 2, 2019 7:08 PM

R68 - Pippa is her nickname. Her real name is Philippa.

by Anonymousreply 70May 2, 2019 7:09 PM

This baby will be Liz and Phil's 8th great-grandchild!

And 8 is a lucky number, so there's that.

by Anonymousreply 71May 2, 2019 7:10 PM

I think when William and Kate released the pictures of the BD kid, they deliberately chose pics in which she looked the most like the grandma....to tug at her heartstrings. Yes, you may have a new grandkid but look at this one, she looks sooo much like you! Our kid is better than theirs...yes, it's like a competition to these straight motherfuckers.

by Anonymousreply 72May 2, 2019 7:10 PM

R70, right, and Catherine is so much prettier than Philippa as a name, no?

by Anonymousreply 73May 2, 2019 7:11 PM

Pippa went through a period of looking decidedly downmarket with orange, fake tan and heavy makeup. Her face is unfortunate in that she bears an uncanny resemblance to the hated Duchess of Windsor. But I do think her figure is enviable, way better than Kate's IMO.

by Anonymousreply 74May 2, 2019 7:11 PM

R72, interesting theory, but something tells me that Elizabeth is beyond that sort of vanity.

by Anonymousreply 75May 2, 2019 7:12 PM

Vote for the Royal Baby's name here!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 76May 2, 2019 7:14 PM

R74, Pippa and Kate are lucky to have each other.

Kate seems closer with her sister than Diana was with either of her two sisters.

Or do I have no idea what I am talking about?

by Anonymousreply 77May 2, 2019 7:15 PM

Kate and Pippa have very similar figures. Meghan bordered on too skinny before her pregnancy.

by Anonymousreply 78May 2, 2019 7:17 PM

I wish they name the baby after a place. How about Africa? There are people, even celebs or celeb sprogs who are named after places: Brooklyn, Asia, China, Savannah.... Here in SF we have a Black female mayor who grew up in the local projects, her first name is London.

by Anonymousreply 79May 2, 2019 7:18 PM

Ava Microsoft Windsor.

Yep, getting $ for the branding.

Isn't this a logical extension of merching? Not for the BRF, being sarcastic here, but for Instagram influencers/ reality show participants.

by Anonymousreply 80May 2, 2019 7:18 PM

Meghan has the worst figure...no tits and no waist!

by Anonymousreply 81May 2, 2019 7:18 PM

Meghan has lovely slender legs and she has a tiny waist. Fergie and Beatrice are the only royals with big boobs.

by Anonymousreply 82May 2, 2019 7:20 PM

Priscilla! As in the wife of Mark Zuckerberg!

by Anonymousreply 83May 2, 2019 7:20 PM

Kate has the height to look great in most anything she wears.

by Anonymousreply 84May 2, 2019 7:21 PM

R79, Vienna or Sienna might be options but I think Meghan will go for something very traditional, like her wedding dress.

by Anonymousreply 85May 2, 2019 7:21 PM

R82, Fergie or Eugenie?

by Anonymousreply 86May 2, 2019 7:21 PM

I think she will give the kid an "Ameican" name.

by Anonymousreply 87May 2, 2019 7:22 PM

*American

by Anonymousreply 88May 2, 2019 7:22 PM

R78 Pippa has a smaller musculoskeletal build than Kate, on top of being more petite in height. She's just more petite overall and has a more spritely figure than Kate.

Meghan's figure is problematic from a fashion standpoint. She has a wide, almost barrel-like upper torso devoid of a definitive waistline, with short neck and square shoulders. Plain language: she has a squat upper body. That's why she need to go with really simple lines and short instead of long skirts/ dresses in order to elongate her figure. I think her legs can do with some weight-bearing exercises to increase muscle mass, tone up those calf muscles.

by Anonymousreply 89May 2, 2019 7:23 PM

R85, Meg seems tiny all over, although she has pied out during her pregnancy.

by Anonymousreply 90May 2, 2019 7:25 PM

Jobs for the boys (and girls). Time we got a DLr on the inside to report news back with authority. Anyone willing to take one for the team?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 91May 2, 2019 7:30 PM

No bust on the royal ladies? What about those low slung girls on the queen and Camilla?

by Anonymousreply 92May 2, 2019 7:43 PM

The Queen Mother, The Queen and Princess Margaret ALL had big busts. Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice take after their mother Fergie as well as the Windsor ladies. Camilla's bust is big too.

by Anonymousreply 93May 2, 2019 7:54 PM

So - BP confirms the baby is still in utero, the announced due date is late April-early May, it IS early May - and Harry is announced as taking off on an overnight event in Europe in . . . early May?

by Anonymousreply 94May 2, 2019 8:04 PM

I think it's quite sad that women who have great busts when they are younger have to succumb to the matronly look later on in life, when they drop. Even though the Queen has such magnificent tailoring, and corsetery, ( or is it corsetry? ) , when those old girls drop, they really go south, don't they? Same with my mother, and she didn't have the Luxe attire, but no-one can really hide it.

by Anonymousreply 95May 2, 2019 8:15 PM

Having a close sister is the best, R77.

by Anonymousreply 96May 2, 2019 8:33 PM

The British public love Merry. Only bitter Americans dislike them.

by Anonymousreply 97May 2, 2019 8:36 PM

R92, old folks such as myself will remember:

"Do your tits hang low? Do the wobble to and 'fro? Can you tie 'em in a knot? Can you tie 'em in a bow?" etc. etc.

by Anonymousreply 98May 2, 2019 8:36 PM

A C cup is the best size. Some fullness but doesn't droop.

by Anonymousreply 99May 2, 2019 8:40 PM

Can you thow 'em over your shoulder, like a regimental soldier, do your tits hang looow!

by Anonymousreply 100May 2, 2019 8:41 PM

Harry has been ordered by Meegan to fetch her some high quality weed, stat. She used to be able to get it onto a plane herself, usually hand delivered by various friends beforehand. Her travel has been hampered for a while. I also imagine she will resume the heavy coke use which she was famous for on Suits. Especially since she won’t be breastfeeding her surrogate born twins.

She must have ave given herself permission to indulge in her fave treat, mounds of ice cream, to attempt to look pregnant.

Problem is, when she does that, the wide African nose grows back. She may have to have another nose job to get it back to her preferred size. Let’s hope she doesn’t go all Margo Thomas Natalie Portman with the beak slicing.

by Anonymousreply 101May 2, 2019 8:42 PM

You can always have surgery to have your breasts reduced. I started getting that matronly look in my midthirties, had a reduction then. Immediately after the surgery the age people were guessing me to be was about 5 years younger, though my face looked the same. More women should do it.

by Anonymousreply 102May 2, 2019 8:42 PM

R101, do you have dementia?

by Anonymousreply 103May 2, 2019 8:43 PM

We're like dads in a 60s-sitcom maternity wing waiting room. Can't wait till we can faint at the news and then pass out cigars.

by Anonymousreply 104May 2, 2019 8:44 PM

R99, yes, you've got the A, the B, the C, and the D is the biggest.

by Anonymousreply 105May 2, 2019 8:47 PM

R99, yes, you've got the A, the B, the C, and the D is the biggest.

by Anonymousreply 106May 2, 2019 8:47 PM

JFC what are the fraus here going on about the best sort of bust size. Fuck, this thread has really gone too shits.

by Anonymousreply 107May 2, 2019 8:48 PM

Maybe that's her push present? A suitcase of skunk from the Dam.

by Anonymousreply 108May 2, 2019 8:52 PM

She's in the wrong country if she's got a cannabis addiction. Best to hot foot it back to California.

by Anonymousreply 109May 2, 2019 8:58 PM

There was a blind about one of her closest friends trying to get hold of weed for the morning of the wedding. Can only imagine it was her make-up artist. If it's true, that must have been funny, he looks a right tit.

by Anonymousreply 110May 2, 2019 9:02 PM

Not sure that's true, I could get hold of weed in about 20 minutes if I wanted to where I live in the UK.

by Anonymousreply 111May 2, 2019 9:07 PM

Yeah, but isn't he American?

by Anonymousreply 112May 2, 2019 9:08 PM

R37, Meghan Markle is not royal and thumbs her nose at royal protocol. If she wants to sell photos, she damn well will.

by Anonymousreply 113May 2, 2019 9:08 PM

Meghan gave out bags of marijuana to the guests at her first wedding in Jamaica.

by Anonymousreply 114May 2, 2019 9:09 PM

Weed smoking causes premature wrinkles!

by Anonymousreply 115May 2, 2019 9:15 PM

Large breasts on an older woman always look matronly, even if they’re propped up.

R82 is a DM writer. “Lovely slender legs” means chicken legs.

by Anonymousreply 116May 2, 2019 9:16 PM

Eugenie is pretty fugtastic and plump.

by Anonymousreply 117May 2, 2019 9:18 PM

Lucky bastard.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 118May 2, 2019 9:22 PM

I bet Eugenie in person is actually normal-to-slim looking, albeit with a big bust and bones. It's hard to grasp because most of the public figures we see are so stick thin our view is distorted. It's like when I was a kid watching "White Christmas," I always thought of Rosemary Clooney as fat because she had to stand next to Vera Ellen. In truth she was probably tiny like all of them, at least at that point in her life.

by Anonymousreply 119May 2, 2019 9:28 PM

^ Sorry I actually meant Beatrice, but applies to Eugenie, too.

by Anonymousreply 120May 2, 2019 9:28 PM

Just came across this photo.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 121May 2, 2019 9:30 PM

R116 - the poster is clearly trolling as one of Meghan's most obvious physical drawbacks is her complete lack of a waist. She's a box between the shoulders and hips.

by Anonymousreply 122May 2, 2019 9:34 PM

Harry's making a Ganja run to Amsterdam, and picking up Sussex bebe on the way back. All is well.

by Anonymousreply 123May 2, 2019 9:44 PM

Oh, you must be right, R123.

by Anonymousreply 124May 2, 2019 9:53 PM

Reminiscing.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 125May 2, 2019 9:54 PM

R123, yes and also having an orgy or two...

by Anonymousreply 126May 2, 2019 9:55 PM

Oh I'd piss myself if we woke up to more of this, Amsterdam style, next week. Looool.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 127May 2, 2019 9:58 PM

This one's better.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 128May 2, 2019 9:59 PM

Hey we've seen Kate's boobies when she was sunbathing.

A little Harry tushie is no biggie.

by Anonymousreply 129May 2, 2019 10:06 PM

R129 - Kate was sunbathing with her husband. Harry was having his photo taken and shared by a sleazy opportunity with whom he was sharing a hotel suite in Vegas.

by Anonymousreply 130May 2, 2019 10:10 PM

^*opportunist

by Anonymousreply 131May 2, 2019 10:11 PM

Egads, those polio legs!

(Bright side to the coat stunt, it distracted the eyes from those godawful stems of hers.)

by Anonymousreply 132May 2, 2019 10:11 PM

Why is there a star over his hole?

by Anonymousreply 133May 2, 2019 10:21 PM

"Megan has lovely slender legs and she has a tiny waist." Translation: "Built like her father but short. No waist, or tits, barrel chest, flat broad ass and chicken legs. Looks terrible in almost everything she tries to wear."

by Anonymousreply 134May 2, 2019 10:27 PM

R133, lol.

The same reason that there is sometimes a star on women's nips in tabloid photos.

NSFW and all that.

by Anonymousreply 135May 2, 2019 10:27 PM

[quote] You sound utterly uninformed and ridiculous.

This goes for virtually every post in this series of 46 threads.

by Anonymousreply 136May 2, 2019 10:27 PM

Is it finally over?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 137May 2, 2019 10:32 PM

Damn! MM was decked out in rings for the Eug's wedding!

by Anonymousreply 138May 2, 2019 10:32 PM

Meg is Hollywood skinny and very photogenic.

by Anonymousreply 139May 2, 2019 10:34 PM

Can we have a summary of all of DL's nicknames for Meghan?

Sparkle, Megalomaniac, ...help me out here please...

by Anonymousreply 140May 2, 2019 10:37 PM

Our favourite is Yoko.

by Anonymousreply 141May 2, 2019 10:38 PM

Smegs, Smeggy, Smegma, DINO, Grifter.....

by Anonymousreply 142May 2, 2019 10:39 PM

My favourite for the two of them is “Ginge & Minge” - makes me laugh every time.

by Anonymousreply 143May 2, 2019 10:40 PM

Oh yes! Lol! Good ones! And Ginge and Cringe.

by Anonymousreply 144May 2, 2019 10:41 PM

MeghAntoinette

by Anonymousreply 145May 2, 2019 10:42 PM

DINO?

by Anonymousreply 146May 2, 2019 10:45 PM

WTF has happened to this thread, as a card carrying frau can all my fellow fraen please stop taking about mammaries and go to say mumsnet and knock yourselves out. To the person who keeps mentioning Zara and Peter Phillips selling photos, they are private citizens, they don't get money from the crown so they can do whatever the fuck they want.

by Anonymousreply 147May 2, 2019 10:46 PM

Megaladon, like the gigantic prehistoric shark.

by Anonymousreply 148May 2, 2019 10:47 PM

Oh, nm got it.

Duchess in name only?

by Anonymousreply 149May 2, 2019 10:47 PM

From the royals and their staff, Me-gain, Duchess Difficult and Tungsten

by Anonymousreply 150May 2, 2019 10:48 PM

From what the Paddy Power spokesman said, the baby is a girl and was born today, May 2nd. Name could be Alice or Grace.

by Anonymousreply 151May 2, 2019 10:49 PM

You got it R149

by Anonymousreply 152May 2, 2019 10:52 PM

Queen Letizia was divorced and her sister revealed that Letizia had an abortion, so she is the first known Abortion Queen.

by Anonymousreply 153May 2, 2019 10:53 PM

In case this hasn't been posted here yet...or if it has. This thread doesn't mind repetition.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 154May 2, 2019 10:54 PM

I mentioned Zara and Phillip. I'm a fan of them both. Yes, they can do what the fuck they want. But a poster above was saying that members of the royal family can't sell photos. Money from the crown wasn't mentioned.

by Anonymousreply 155May 2, 2019 10:55 PM

One of the comments on R154 added "how much will it cost? Lots and lots!"

by Anonymousreply 156May 2, 2019 10:58 PM

Zara is also attaching her name to the marketing of numerous items now, including a rather hideous collection of "equestrian-themed" jewelry.

So actually, Zara is the most merching royalish now.

Those second tier sort-a royals need money. Especially Zara, now that her husband will be essentially unemployed for the rest of his life as his rugby career is over. Maybe he can get a job as a rugby coach at Eton, with a good recommendation from Wills.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 157May 2, 2019 10:59 PM

Here is a particularly awful piece from the "Zara Phillips" Calleija Collection.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 158May 2, 2019 11:02 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 159May 2, 2019 11:05 PM

Merching Zara and "King of Nepotism" Phil are sure finding their way to stay afloat in their highfalutin world.

by Anonymousreply 160May 2, 2019 11:08 PM

Zara merching for Rolex....this girls on fire with the merching!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 161May 2, 2019 11:14 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 162May 2, 2019 11:16 PM

Pity that Anne didn't marry well - her children have to resort to such vulgarities to earn some extra quid.

by Anonymousreply 163May 2, 2019 11:19 PM

So froglet forthcoming?

by Anonymousreply 164May 2, 2019 11:22 PM

Last night, I was laying in bed looking out at the night sky. Naturally my thoughts wandered from hopes, and secret dreams to one dream in particular. That dream? Dreamboat Andy. Gays, and frauen...as you can imagine "down there" became tingly. I opened up my laptop, and went to seancody.com, which I usually do anyway. This time however, nothing really helped my baton buzz. I decided to make my wishes come true, so off to work I went. After completing my masterpiece of masturbatory material, I was soaring on the wings of the lusty angels.

I know with the royal birth upon us, we are stressed and worried. Perhaps I can pass on a way to help us blow off steam, and flick your beans. Please let me know if my artwork healed your soul, as it has healed mine.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 165May 2, 2019 11:23 PM

I'm howling R165, lol lol lol lol! Bravo!

by Anonymousreply 166May 2, 2019 11:45 PM

R157 You silly MM Stans just don't get it do you? Zara and Peter can merch away, Zara can pose naked on a horse with only her ugly necklace on and sell the photos if she wants. They are private citizens they are not funded by the British taxpayer, they don't get free houses and clothes from Prince Charles, they don't have massive security detail, they don't get a yearly wage from the Crown etc etc. Yes Zara and Peter cash in on their connections, yes they are privileged but bottom line they can do that. MM is not supposed to cash in because she is paid fucking thousands by the Crown for being a working HRH.

by Anonymousreply 167May 2, 2019 11:51 PM

'MM is 'not supposed to cash in because she is paid fucking thousands by the Crown for being a working HRH. '

Why are you getting so worked up over a hypothetical situation? She hasn't sold any of her pictures.

by Anonymousreply 168May 2, 2019 11:53 PM

Talking of Randy Andy, I'm old enough to remember the rumour that Fergie and Andy broke up because she caught him in bed with one of his Navy buddies

by Anonymousreply 169May 2, 2019 11:53 PM

R141 No I don't think Yoko fits at all. Yoko Ono for those who don't know, came from one of the oldest/ grandest and wealthiest families in Japan. Her family clan dates back to the 1400s, it's as old money and status as you could get. Think of it as the Japanese version of coming from dukedom of Devonshire or Norfolk. Weird and drugged out as she was when she hooked up with John, Yoko could not be compared to Meghan.

by Anonymousreply 170May 2, 2019 11:54 PM

Oh dish R169 honey!

by Anonymousreply 171May 2, 2019 11:55 PM

'No I don't think Yoko fits at all. Yoko Ono for those who don't know, came from one of the oldest/ grandest and wealthiest families in Japan'

Imagine if Harry had married some fugly Japanese woman instead of an American. Grim. Thank goodness he didn't.

by Anonymousreply 172May 2, 2019 11:57 PM

R168 Oh dear you really need to read what I said, I was talking about MM merching in general which she does already.

by Anonymousreply 173May 2, 2019 11:59 PM

Per lap dog Omid Scooby-Doo on January 14th :

[quote]The day also saw the couple even more candid about their impending parenthood. “It’s very exciting,” Harry told a local in the crowd after unveiling a plaque commemorating 100 years since the death of poet Wilfred Owen. And Meghan, who admitted pregnancy has “flown by,” dropped her biggest hint about her due date, admitting she was six and a half months pregnant to a young female fan.”

Just because Harry is moron and can't do math doesn't mean everyone else can't put 2 and 2 together and end up with an answer of WTF?

by Anonymousreply 174May 3, 2019 12:05 AM

The Harper's Bazaar article referenced in R174

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 175May 3, 2019 12:07 AM

Add Imelda Markle to the list.

by Anonymousreply 176May 3, 2019 12:07 AM

R171 Just a really old rumour that went around at the time of their separation I honestly can't remember where I heard it but it was a definite rumour a the time. I think people were confused why they stayed as such close friends despite her public "toe sucking" and thought she had some dirt on him.

by Anonymousreply 177May 3, 2019 12:08 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 178May 3, 2019 12:09 AM

I'm a Scouser. I doubt many Scousers of the time knew of Yoko's background. Nor still do. But Markle is Markling the RF, like Yoko Yoko'd The Beatles.

by Anonymousreply 179May 3, 2019 12:09 AM

I was completely into wanting to see the baby until they pulled this never ending impending birth bullshit.

Now I refuse to click or god forbid buy any publication announcing the birth/ publishing photos.

by Anonymousreply 180May 3, 2019 12:14 AM

A Japanese-English Princess would be interesting.

by Anonymousreply 181May 3, 2019 12:19 AM

We're watching a soap where kids get SORASd or one of the characters is pregnant for a year and a half.

by Anonymousreply 182May 3, 2019 12:21 AM

R179 Yeah I doubt many knew of Yoko's personal or family history back then because she presented herself as an artist instead of a talentless hack from a wealthy and high-ranking family. I mean FFS she was a classmate of (now former) emperor Akihito! For a Japanese woman of her generation, to speak English that well and attain that level of education was indicative of her family status. I'm not sure how much of her history she divulged to John but I think they were both zonked out of their brains on so many psychedelics that it didn't matter. She sure had a hold on him and he sure did respond to her in a way that he never did anyone else. The open marriage thing at the end was interesting, what an odd couple.

by Anonymousreply 183May 3, 2019 12:22 AM

Maybe Meghan is more of a Linda Eastman. Linda was a sort of a groupie, albeit one from a well-to-do family, and snared Paul McCartney, who had issues over losing his mother at a young age. I’ve never understood why Linda got less blame than Yoko. Wasn’t she inserting herself in Beatles business as well?

And then came Heather. In fact maybe what Harry needs is a talk with Sir Paul.

by Anonymousreply 184May 3, 2019 12:25 AM

One of my favourite comments ever in the Daily Mail was " Meghan Markle is Heather Mills with an extra shoe ".

by Anonymousreply 185May 3, 2019 12:30 AM

Megnancy= a gestation that last forever and produces nothing but rumors.

by Anonymousreply 186May 3, 2019 12:31 AM

did no one notice that the woman in the low curtsy was GOOP? She put a theatrical spin on it

by Anonymousreply 187May 3, 2019 12:32 AM

Wait, 6 1/2 months pregnant in mid-January (per Harper's Bazaar) means she was 9 1/2 months in mid-A pril.

by Anonymousreply 188May 3, 2019 12:33 AM

R184 LOL good point about Meghan being more Linda Eastman. I think Linda maybe perpetuated or hinted that she was from the famous Eastman family (Eastman-Kodak fame), when she wasn't. Linda got Paul to become vegetarian or other way around? Regardless, they were also both joined at the hip doing things together as a unit with Linda performing in The Wings when she had no musical training. She kept him on a tight leash to keep eye out for groupies perhaps, what better way to do it than to be in the same band? Doubt they'd have an open marriage like the Lennons did at the end.

by Anonymousreply 189May 3, 2019 12:33 AM

Why would she breastfeed? It would ruin her breasts.

by Anonymousreply 190May 3, 2019 12:35 AM

^ I mean, that was what she told another pregnant woman. But even if she were only 6 months, it still means 9 months at mid April.

I think she's had it. I just can't believe no one has leaked it.

by Anonymousreply 191May 3, 2019 12:36 AM

So many jealous 200 lbs fraus on this thread who would love to look like Meghan.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 192May 3, 2019 12:39 AM

I think she had the baby too but they've managed to keep a tight lid on it until the big reveal, as only fitting of the Deal or No Deal Girl. At least she learned a few tricks from that embarrassing gig.

by Anonymousreply 193May 3, 2019 12:40 AM

Uurgh

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 194May 3, 2019 12:41 AM

BP went on record earlier today to say the Duchess of Sussex has not delivered the baby yet.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 195May 3, 2019 12:41 AM

R138, you know what we say about “beringedness” here at DL...

by Anonymousreply 196May 3, 2019 12:41 AM

Yep, but at around 11pm yesterday here (it's 1.42am now in the UK) the spokesman of the biggest Bookies, PaddyPower, suspended all bets on the delivery date or gender of the baby after a suspicious flurry of bets on yesterday and a girl. They rarely do that, so I think the official announcement will be tomorrow.

by Anonymousreply 197May 3, 2019 12:43 AM

So judging by Harry's math and assuming BP is not fibbing, that makes Meghan's 10 months pregnant. Let's hope for the baby's sake that Harry went to Trump's School of Bad Math.

by Anonymousreply 198May 3, 2019 12:43 AM

A girl, blue eyes, dark hair, called Rosa Elizabeth Diana.

by Anonymousreply 199May 3, 2019 12:44 AM

According to Marie Claire she told Jessica BalloonyFace she was pregnant in the August. Work that one out, DLers!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 200May 3, 2019 12:45 AM

Why would anyone want to look like Markle?

Despite how she makes a living, she is not attractive. That’s one thing that’s fascinating about her.

by Anonymousreply 201May 3, 2019 12:45 AM

'So judging by Harry's math and assuming BP is not fibbing, that makes Meghan's 10 months pregnant. Let's hope for the baby's sake that Harry went to Trump's School of Bad Math'

What are you spazzing on about, stupid conspiracy theorist? Behave like an adult, or fuck off.

by Anonymousreply 202May 3, 2019 12:45 AM

'Despite how she makes a living, she is not attractive. That’s one thing that’s fascinating about her'

She's very attractive, which is why she was kept on Suits for seven years. Denying it makes you look really, really stupid (and probably 200 lbs). Fat old fraus always envy young, skinny, rich ones.

by Anonymousreply 203May 3, 2019 12:46 AM

She's thin, but her figure's nothing to write home about.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 204May 3, 2019 12:48 AM

R203, you sound quite mentally ill.

by Anonymousreply 205May 3, 2019 12:48 AM

Fuck off R202 I'm one of the sane ones here who consistently tell off Meghan not pregnant ass wipes. Lighten up and don't take everything in such an antagonistic way, which part of my part signals me as a conspiracy theorist? Go fuck yourself.

by Anonymousreply 206May 3, 2019 12:48 AM

Saying she's ten months pregnant is inferring she isn't really pregnant, moron. If you're not a Meghan Truther, do a better job of not posting like one.

by Anonymousreply 207May 3, 2019 12:51 AM

You ancient fraus do realise that modern pregnancy tests will tell you that are pregnant as early as TWO WEEKS in, don't you? Or are you stuck in the dark ages when nobody can tell until three months in.

by Anonymousreply 208May 3, 2019 12:53 AM

R207, it's not my fault you jump to conclusions that allow you to tsk tsk other people. I was mainly joking about Harry's bad math/ mental deficiencies, with inference about 10-month+ babies being medical oddities. Why don't you not jump on others' throats next time when going by "inferences", there's an idea. Ask first before striking.

by Anonymousreply 209May 3, 2019 12:56 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 210May 3, 2019 1:03 AM

Some people count pregnancy in lunar months. A lunar month being exactly 4 weeks and a pregnancy exactly 10 months.

I have seen a lot more women using that system the last several yrs.

by Anonymousreply 211May 3, 2019 1:04 AM

A bit like Angelina too.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 212May 3, 2019 1:05 AM

Most OBs go by 40 weeks.

by Anonymousreply 213May 3, 2019 1:08 AM

omg, these poor modern women, having to be pregnant an extra month.

by Anonymousreply 214May 3, 2019 1:11 AM

R211 The only people counting in lunar months are nutters who think they are having their baby at Hogwarts

by Anonymousreply 215May 3, 2019 1:12 AM

R209, I am jumping on all the Ct-ers, haven't you noticed? Especially the main one.

by Anonymousreply 216May 3, 2019 1:13 AM

Actually, in the US, OB/Gyns and their patients measure pregnancies by week. A full-term pregnancy is 40 weeks. At 42 weeks, the baby is considered past due and will be induced.

40 weeks is 10 months.

by Anonymousreply 217May 3, 2019 1:16 AM

The lunar cycles are known to have a big impact on pregnancy and menstruation, r215.

by Anonymousreply 218May 3, 2019 1:16 AM

Meanwhile for those of us back on planet earth and not counting lunar months, you can have a transvaginal scan and it can pick up a pregnancy at 6 weeks, even earlier sometimes especially after an embryo transfer in IVF

by Anonymousreply 219May 3, 2019 1:17 AM

R219, the tests you can buy from chemists pick it up at TWO WEEKS because of changes in hormone levels in the urine. So need for any scans, Fuglicia.

by Anonymousreply 220May 3, 2019 1:19 AM

Why do some posters take it so personally if the mention of surrogate or alternative is made? Her bump varied in sizes throughout, dates are conflicting...and seems a lot of secrecy in the last month or so. Could be many things...she’s too much of attention addict to keep away from public. She could be ill, or baby,complications, etc If they had someone else carry the pregnancy, which celebs do on the regular now btw...it would be the,outing to her to follow Kim K or Beyoncé. She’s a celeb copycat .

by Anonymousreply 221May 3, 2019 1:20 AM

I can't believe someone's trying to convince everyone that pregnancy is now a ten month process, because...Meghan.

by Anonymousreply 222May 3, 2019 1:22 AM

^she sure is shaking things up!

by Anonymousreply 223May 3, 2019 1:23 AM

Yes, after IVF embryo transfer, pregnancy is determined in 2-3 weeks, of course no guarantee of full-term pregnancy or live birth to healthy baby. twins arrive earlier upon calls than the 40 weeks.

by Anonymousreply 224May 3, 2019 1:24 AM

She reminds me of Jodi Arias.

by Anonymousreply 225May 3, 2019 1:25 AM

More accurately, it’s a 40-week process. A month has 30 or 31 days, so isn’t accurate in measuring pregnancies. Weeks is the best measurement.

by Anonymousreply 226May 3, 2019 1:25 AM

R221, this would not happen in the BRF, are you insane? She might resort to a surrogate but she would explain why she was doing it and be completely transparent, just like Kim Kardashian, Ayda Williams and any other public figure.

Plus, Beyoncé didn't have a surrogate, so caught you out CT-ing yet again.

by Anonymousreply 227May 3, 2019 1:25 AM

R221 - To answer your question: for the same reason we would take it personally if someone on one of these threads tried to persuade the rest of us that the earth is flat, or that Sam Heughan is straight.

by Anonymousreply 228May 3, 2019 1:25 AM

R228, surely you are not a Sam frau?

by Anonymousreply 229May 3, 2019 1:27 AM

Yes r225! Or the batshit and determined female astronaut who stalked man and wore the adult Diapers!

Mm so image conscious...what if she had the baby but thinks it’s not cute? That would keep her home!

by Anonymousreply 230May 3, 2019 1:27 AM

The British public would have been very sympathetic had M and H had fertility issues. Everyone would understand if she had a surrogate, but what they wouldn't condone would be PRETENDING TO BE PREGNANT, which Kim and Ayda and others NEVER did.

The whole idea of her bump being fake is ridiculous.

by Anonymousreply 231May 3, 2019 1:29 AM

R228, relax, have some fun, it’s not all about you snowflake. If you can’t open your mind to all the possibilities, have the good sense to move along to next comment. Let it go!!

by Anonymousreply 232May 3, 2019 1:29 AM

A child not born of body, aka via surrogate, cannot inherit. I can't see her risking her entire $$$$. She prob she carried small and announced way too early.

Only victim is the kid that'll forever have this what-if follow them around, you'd think Harry would be the one to avoid this shit after his rumours.

by Anonymousreply 233May 3, 2019 1:32 AM

R232 - You asked a question, I answered it. I don't have to open my mind to the possibility that the earth is flat, or that the Prince of Wales's son and daughter in law perpetrated a false pregnancy on the British public.

by Anonymousreply 234May 3, 2019 1:32 AM

This baby better very strongly resemble them, her skin and his looks.

by Anonymousreply 235May 3, 2019 1:36 AM

R233, the British public know that Harry's kids won't inherit.

by Anonymousreply 236May 3, 2019 1:38 AM

R220 yes and home pregnancies never give false positives or a negative result. Tell that to the RCOG or the ACOG and tell them to stop taking blood HCG levels and TVU's to determine pregnancy. Maybe they could dispense with all medical tests and use the moon as a guide. Either MM has had the baby and lied or she had IVF and had a positive transvaginal scan at 5 weeks and announced it at Eugenie's wedding.

by Anonymousreply 237May 3, 2019 1:38 AM

R222, it’s not a conspiracy. It’s how pregnancies are commonly measured - 40 weeks is full-term (between 38 and 42 weeks is normal). If you like, you can google it. Perhaps it’s confusing because pregnancies are also split into three trimesters, which would be more like nine months.

It’s not an exact science. It’s a little confusing. But it’s not a conspiracy.

by Anonymousreply 238May 3, 2019 1:39 AM

I forgot Kim K had a surrogate.

by Anonymousreply 239May 3, 2019 1:40 AM

R235, Skippy is missing you.

by Anonymousreply 240May 3, 2019 1:40 AM

That closing the bets thing is no barometer. It happened in November when Paddy Power suspended bets because of an unprecedented amount placed on Meghan having twins.

It happened again on March 20th,

[quote]Paddy Power has suspended betting on the gender of the couple's first child. The decision comes after "sustained betting activity" on it being a girl over the last few days. A spokesperson for Paddy Power said: "Since yesterday afternoon we've seen continued betting on Harry and Meghan's first child being female, and we're now so convinced that we have stopped taking further bets on the gender.

by Anonymousreply 241May 3, 2019 1:43 AM

The only thing clear to me at this point is that she wasn't 12 weeks pregnant at Eugenie's wedding. More like 10 or 11 weeks. She likely had her "12-week" scan early. I suppose the doctors will do that for a member of the BRF.

by Anonymousreply 242May 3, 2019 1:46 AM

Look real?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 243May 3, 2019 1:53 AM

The problem with the photo at R243 isn't that her bump is strange, its that she's wearing non-maternity clothing so it doesn't fit her pregnant body properly. It bunches up under her breasts, etc.

by Anonymousreply 244May 3, 2019 1:57 AM

First of all, 40 weeks does not equal 10 months. Each month has 4 weeks and (up to) three days. The only month that has exactly 4 weeks is February (excepting leap years). Count out 280 days (40 weeks) on a calendar and you get 9 months and 1 week.

by Anonymousreply 245May 3, 2019 1:58 AM

R208, you seem to know a lot about “fat, ancient fraus (sic).”

Which tells me you are.... a fat, ancient frau.

by Anonymousreply 246May 3, 2019 1:59 AM

[quote] A child not born of body, aka via surrogate, cannot inherit.

Where is this information coming from? I don't think the laws of succession would have contemplated surrogacy so why would "born of the body" have applied? The only time I've heard anything close is in "heir of the body" which doesn't mean the same thing. If Harry and Meghan have a child with their genetic material carried in another person's body that child would still be a an "heir of the body" of Harry. Clearly, the child is not born from his body.

If anyone has specific information about the laws of succession prohibiting surrogacy, I'm interested.

That doesn't mean I think Meghan isn't pregnant. I just don't know the source of this information about "born of the body."

by Anonymousreply 247May 3, 2019 2:01 AM

None of you are frau first babies rarely deliver on time.

by Anonymousreply 248May 3, 2019 2:02 AM

There are 4.36 weeks in a month.

by Anonymousreply 249May 3, 2019 2:03 AM

The 'born of the body' law is centuries old, and meant so that birthday had to be witnessed it avoid babies getting snuck in.

I believe viscount Weymouth had their second child via surrogate, and challenged the 'born of the body' law in 2016. They lost and the law was held up, meaning any surrogate child is limited in what they can inherit.

Looking up their case might give you more specific information.

by Anonymousreply 250May 3, 2019 2:09 AM

Fun fact: William takes a lover, no big deal. Kate takes a lover, possible treason under The Treason Act of 1351.

Who knew a romp with Diana could have a landed her lovers in the clink?

by Anonymousreply 251May 3, 2019 2:10 AM

You can go on Google and pull up a Days between Dates calculator and plug in dates. Pregnancy is 40 weeks/280 days, give or take a week or so if early/late. Doctors aren't going to let Meghan go over a week late. So, for example, if she conceived on July 21st, she would have been 11 weeks at Eugenie's wedding and will be at 40 weeks plus 6 days (286 days) tomorrow. So ready to pop at any second or they'll induce her. But we of course don't know her exact conception date so the birth could occur even further into May.

I don't trust any of these reports that she told people she was 4 months pregnant or 6 1/2 months pregnant. They make no sense.

by Anonymousreply 252May 3, 2019 2:10 AM

The Viscount & Viscountess of Weymouth posted a legal challenge to the Peerage law in 2016, specifically to the “born of the body” part, in reference to a child born via gestational carrier. The law was upheld, despite the fact that their 2nd son is as much genetically theirs as their first son. This was only 3 years ago, so we’re not talking about ancient history, or “before the age of DNA testing.”

Here is a picture of the former Emma McQuiston, a beauty who makes the Markle hag look like a cheap knock-off.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 253May 3, 2019 2:12 AM

R247 - Yet again, the issue is that in the UK the birth mother is considered the legal mother regardless of any biological tie or the lack thereof, which means that Harry and Meghan could not even make legal claim to the child until the birth mother signs a waiver of parental rights. The "heir of the body" term referred to adoption; obviously, surrogacy being a modern development, it complicates matters.

Adoptees cannot inherit

Re Surrogacy: this is from cambridge.org

"Genetics: surrogacy. Surrogacy is the final case where legal parental status is recognised for all legal purposes except for succession to titles."

I was about to bring up the Weymouth case but R253 beat me to it.

Emma McQuiston is who Meghan Markle likes to pretend she is.

by Anonymousreply 254May 3, 2019 2:13 AM

Sorry R250, I didn't realize you had already posted about the Weymouths.

by Anonymousreply 255May 3, 2019 2:13 AM

I distinctly recall seeing the video of Diana’s dance performance for Charles. The song was ‘All I Ask Of You’ from Phantom of The Opera. The last line of the song is “Love me, that’s all I ask of you” and I swear the video showed Diana mouthing them to Charles.

by Anonymousreply 256May 3, 2019 2:17 AM

As far as Paddy Power goes, do remember that the betting odds for a LEAVE win on 23 June 2016 were 14% as opposed to REMAIN's 86%.

The rest, as they say, is history.

The betting odds are based on the size of punter's bets, not real polls or facts.

by Anonymousreply 257May 3, 2019 2:19 AM

Many celebrities going surrogate route...Beyonce admitted to for second pregnancy after first one was called out for Moonbump. Kim k admitted to it for second pregnancy, and Amal Clooney with twins, widely suspected but not made public. It’s not a big deal.

by Anonymousreply 258May 3, 2019 2:23 AM

R258 - It's not a big deal if you're honest about it. It's a big deal if you pretend to be pregnant when you're a member of the BRF and the British taxpayers who shelled out millions to renovate your little cottage to your taxes are played for fools.

by Anonymousreply 259May 3, 2019 2:25 AM

R257 Bitch is probably at home in Froghollow betting large amounts on herself. Anything for publicity

by Anonymousreply 260May 3, 2019 2:29 AM

It chaps my hide to admit but it is to Kim K's credit she was open and honest about using a surrogate--even more importantly she doesn't live off the largesse of the British taxpayer.

by Anonymousreply 261May 3, 2019 2:31 AM

Link to the legal case of the Viscount of Weymouth, please. I've seen stories about Emma and the surrogacy but not about the legal challenge.

It seems different because they didn't use a surrogate for their heir.

If the surrogate were single, the biological father's would be the legal father so Harry would be named on the birth certificate. It seems to me the issue would be that the legal mother and the legal father aren't married so the child would be legally illegitimate not because of the "heir of the body" succession issue but because of how British law handles surrogacy. In any event, for purposes of succession it's not Meghan's "body" that's important to the heir, it's Harry's. Matters not. The archaic British laws aren't designed for succession through surrogacy.

by Anonymousreply 262May 3, 2019 2:31 AM

“People” (meaning Meghan) published on Oct 15 that she already had her 12 week scan. Presumably the scan would have happened before Oct 12– wedding day, as Markle was booked pretty solid on and after the 12th getting ready for tour.

“Us” published a “report” on Oct 15 that said Meghan was 15 weeks.

by Anonymousreply 263May 3, 2019 2:33 AM

This Express article discusses why the Weymouths went the surrogate route.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 264May 3, 2019 2:35 AM

Damn shame that the surrogate cannot inherit.

Beyoncé was for sure pregnant for her second pregnancy.

by Anonymousreply 265May 3, 2019 2:43 AM

R254 FWIW "heir of the body" doesn't refer to adoption. There are many ways that a person can become an heir. Think of a final will and testament. Everyone who received anything from great grandpa Joe counts as his heirs. If he gave everything his owns to his masseuse s/he/they would be the heir to his estate but not born of his body or adopted.

by Anonymousreply 266May 3, 2019 2:44 AM

oops that should be

not "heir of the body" or adopted.

by Anonymousreply 267May 3, 2019 2:47 AM

I'm not sure which one I'm looking forward to more, SussexStandby or the end of the 96 hours that Skippy said it would take for the charges against Meghan to be made public. Supposedly she's locked up in Windsor Castle while she's being interrogated.

Meghan is mildly entertaining, but the Tumblr frauen are a barrel of laughs.

by Anonymousreply 268May 3, 2019 3:01 AM

So.... no Met Gala appearance this year I take it? No Oscar appearance last year in a $120,000 Dior mumu and ugly-ass $12,000 Birks earrings. How's an errant duchess going to properly merch?

by Anonymousreply 269May 3, 2019 3:11 AM

R258, I agree!! When anyone mentions it on this thread it is called crazy talk. One possibility and would explain a lot.. This relationship is like a mesmerizing car accident. She’s one determined woman, and phony to the core. I find it highly plausible she is capable of this type of fraud and bad acting....weird part is that she hasn’t hauled out a baby for attention yet. That’s not the gal we know.

by Anonymousreply 270May 3, 2019 3:20 AM

Gayle King is doing a CBS Special on Harry and Meghan plus one on May 17th. I wouldn’t be surprised is Meghan saved the big baby reveal for the show. Gross!

by Anonymousreply 271May 3, 2019 3:26 AM

did Beyonce ever admit to the surrogates? There was a woman suing her and claimed she birthed blue ivy. More celebrities that had baby via surrogacy: Lucy Lu; Elizabeth Banks; SJP; Katey Segal; Angela bassett; Nicole Kidman; Jordana Brewster...NPH, Andy, Ricky Martin, Elton.

by Anonymousreply 272May 3, 2019 3:30 AM

R271...you’re probably right! Gayle King...hmm, I won’t even say it.

by Anonymousreply 273May 3, 2019 3:32 AM

R270 R258 R259 FYI the other posters can see that you're replying to your own comments.

by Anonymousreply 274May 3, 2019 3:33 AM

That should be R271 instead of R259

by Anonymousreply 275May 3, 2019 3:34 AM

That would be human biology, R222, and it has nothing to do with Me-Gain.

Human gestation is 40 weeks on average. First pregnancies often go an extra week or 2.

Did none of you pay attention in high school?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 276May 3, 2019 3:38 AM

R274/R275 - I only posted once on this thread, so I don’t know what you mean. When I read about Gayle King’s special it made sense to me that Meghan might not present her baby until then. That’s all.

by Anonymousreply 277May 3, 2019 3:45 AM

The sad thing about Charles and Di was that, superficially, they looked great together. Realistically, they were awful for each other.

by Anonymousreply 278May 3, 2019 3:47 AM

R271 Mea culpa. Sorry I bundled you in with the person who was posting questions and responses to herself about celebrity surrogates. It was R272.

by Anonymousreply 279May 3, 2019 3:53 AM

Tom Bower's book "Rebel Prince" suggests that Di hay have used cocaine.

by Anonymousreply 280May 3, 2019 3:54 AM

R275 - that’s okay, it gets confusing.

by Anonymousreply 281May 3, 2019 3:57 AM

DIdnt we all r280. ..What else would one do with Dodi?

by Anonymousreply 282May 3, 2019 3:58 AM

R282, I suppose she had a rotten deal in terms of her marriage to Prince Charles. I do feel sorry for her.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 283May 3, 2019 4:00 AM

There is no shame in using a surrogate, as long as you’re honest about it.

I’m not saying MM is or isn’t using one. I tend to think she’s pregnant, but there’s a little part of me that can understand why people think there is a surrogate. Those bumps defy logic.

by Anonymousreply 284May 3, 2019 4:00 AM

R3 Baby Sussex is tied up in Customs.

by Anonymousreply 285May 3, 2019 4:03 AM

R13 They should have revoked it after seeing that thing piled on her head.

by Anonymousreply 286May 3, 2019 4:09 AM

....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 287May 3, 2019 4:19 AM

....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 288May 3, 2019 4:21 AM

....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 289May 3, 2019 4:23 AM

....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 290May 3, 2019 4:32 AM

....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 291May 3, 2019 4:35 AM

....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 292May 3, 2019 4:36 AM

....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 293May 3, 2019 4:38 AM

No, I saw that video of Beyonce on Ellen, her big tummy bent/folded when she sat down. Definitely fake.

by Anonymousreply 294May 3, 2019 5:01 AM

Beyonce was pregnant both times. She really ballooned, not just her belly but all over. If she could carry twins to term, why would she have needed a surrogate for Blue Ivy?

Kim used a surrogate for her third child and her fourth, due this month.

by Anonymousreply 295May 3, 2019 5:04 AM

I think she's carrying the child but there were many women who said there was no way a pregnant woman would be able to scoot down, crouch down etc while talking to a child or etc. when they saw her pictures. I do know know anything about that.

by Anonymousreply 296May 3, 2019 5:04 AM

R295, my eyes do not lie to me, I saw her tummy folded over. millions saw it. she wasn't pregnant that time.

by Anonymousreply 297May 3, 2019 5:05 AM

Conspiracy nutters, here's the video of Beyonce. Like a kitten with a ball of string, you should be entertained for hours.

I think the dress fits too closely around the hips so the midsection folds up when she sits, but if you want to go with Moonbump, have at it.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 298May 3, 2019 5:12 AM

The difference is the surrogacy laws in the UK and the fact that a child carried by surrogate is out of the line of succession. Those things are not relevant to US celebs.

If a UK citizen contracts with a surrogate who is a citizen of and who lives in a non UK country, what then re: legal proceedings needed? Does the mother still have to relinquish the child in a UK court of law?

by Anonymousreply 299May 3, 2019 5:12 AM

R299, no, because once the child is legally adopted, the surrogate is no longer the legal guardian.

by Anonymousreply 300May 3, 2019 5:29 AM

You can bend and stoop when 8/9 months pregnant, just like people who put on 30lbs can still stoop and bend. The bump does change shape depending on the child's position.

by Anonymousreply 301May 3, 2019 5:31 AM

When you're estranged from your family of origin and right away become estranged from the family you married into (the absurdly described 'family you never had'); well hell, the common denominator is you. You are the problem, MEghan, a complete and toxic utter disaster.

by Anonymousreply 302May 3, 2019 5:33 AM

Harry's kids will never be on the throne. The succession is Charles, Wills, George, George's first born. This isn't the 19th century and they're not all going to be knocked out in a cholera epidemic.

by Anonymousreply 303May 3, 2019 5:48 AM

'You are the problem, MEghan, a complete and toxic utter disaster.'

In your eyes only. She's loved by Londoners.

by Anonymousreply 304May 3, 2019 5:50 AM

R158, Equestrian-themed jewelry for the tony set is extremely popular. Gucci has an entire line of it.

by Anonymousreply 305May 3, 2019 6:12 AM

What a tiresome, boring thread this has become.

by Anonymousreply 306May 3, 2019 6:34 AM

Can the idiot trying to convince everyone that Londoners love Megs kindly give it a rest. This is the third time I've read your shit.

by Anonymousreply 307May 3, 2019 6:34 AM

Ok, lets speculate on the next outrageous faux pas the HazBeans will commit...

My guess it is that they will do the "big reveal" of their offspring on tv or the cover of a semi-trashy magazine like People, for a huge fee of course.

by Anonymousreply 308May 3, 2019 7:01 AM

If Meghan happened to be white she would have been run the fuck out of the UK by a mob with pitchforks and torches.

by Anonymousreply 309May 3, 2019 7:04 AM

https://www.instagram.com/p/Bw-eyZcgQfoCYxfqSsfW2_N8R6QM0M9bqjOwlE0/

Meghan No Mates.

Love the snark.

by Anonymousreply 310May 3, 2019 8:14 AM

Soz. Here's the headline link for above.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 311May 3, 2019 8:15 AM

I see torontopaper is back, again saying nothing of any real substance.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 312May 3, 2019 8:19 AM

A theory of me : M is last seen 11.03.19 . Let us suppose the surrogate gave birth 20.03.19 an d we are now 03.05.19 that 7 weeks . I read here on the tread that is 6 weeks for the adoption papers to be filed at court and the adoption is ready . So all that poeha and hype is to conceal they used a surrogate . Hey its not written in stone just a theory of me . So i guess in a few days the birth will be announced .

by Anonymousreply 313May 3, 2019 8:44 AM

R313 No, you did not read any of that on here.

New parents have six weeks to register a birth.

It takes over a year to get an adoption before a judge.

So your theory is idiotic.

by Anonymousreply 314May 3, 2019 9:05 AM

In the UK the surrogate is the child's legal parent and goes on the birth cert then you have to apply to adopt them. I assume there are tougher laws here in the UK than America. All that being said, I don't think she used a surrogate, you can't fake that fat puffed up face and ass she had last time she was out in public. She must be the size of a whale by now, hence no sighting of her.

by Anonymousreply 315May 3, 2019 9:14 AM

R306 It really has.

by Anonymousreply 316May 3, 2019 10:05 AM

Yeah, the thread is a total loss so far. I was tempted to explain just how MM is so much more like Yoko than Linda, but it occurred to me that I don't give a fuck.

by Anonymousreply 317May 3, 2019 10:09 AM

Lets rinse our eyes and have a look at Royals at the Met Ball over the years.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 318May 3, 2019 10:17 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 319May 3, 2019 10:22 AM

R8 I read Diana thought they were at their closest when she was pregnant with Harry and after he was born, although Charles was pretty nasty the day he was born, disappointed it wasn't a girl and complaining the baby looked like a Spencer.

R14 Charles didn't look elsewhere when the shine wore off, he never stopped having an affair! Diana found romantic cufflinks inscribed from Camilla on their honeymoon! The only way that marriage had a chance is if Diana turned a blind eye and stopped being so effected by Charles' affair.

by Anonymousreply 320May 3, 2019 10:24 AM

A pregnant woman CAN squat and stoop. But not with knees together. The laws of physics are immutable.

by Anonymousreply 321May 3, 2019 10:25 AM

R321 What shit.

The bump doesn’t hang between the legs, so why wouldn’t someone be able to squat with legs together?

And if she could do it with the bulk of a “moonbump” why not with the bulk of a pregnant belly? What’s the difference?

Quite funny that you’re trying to invoke “the laws of physics” when simple logic seems to have bypassed you altogether.

She’s pregnant. Get the fuck over it & grow up.

by Anonymousreply 322May 3, 2019 10:31 AM

Wanted to point out to the poster upthread, that is not Gwyneth Paltrow curtsying to the Queen. It’s Princess Mette-Marit of Norway.

In confirming this, I stumbled on this series of famous people curtsying. Almost all look ridiculous. And why is Gaga genuflecting before the Queen? As an American, I find it tacky when Americans do that.,

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 323May 3, 2019 10:46 AM

I love Joan's curtsy, R323

by Anonymousreply 324May 3, 2019 10:52 AM

r322 A moonbump doesn't weigh the same or behave the same as a pregnant belly. The text below is a quote from another forum where the poster asked their 7 month pregnant cousin to squat down. I've seen video of Kate being unable to crouch down low like MM does.

a! when I saw her at Easter I actually did request her to try a few things to test out my MM theories! Despite some epic side-eye from her she complied.. :LOL:

Cousin stats for reference lol: 5’7”, very slim (like size 0/2), does yoga and pilates, crazy flexible, bump the size of a large food baby (even though she’s 7 months along)

* asked her to crouch down, knees together, and pop up without help — 3 attempts, no luck, bump would not allow her to crouch down no less getting up lol * crouch down knees together with me holding her hand for balance — she still wasn’t able to do the crouching down-knees in-and leaning in to talk to child pose that MM does * disappearing bump when sitting down — bump does change a bit depending on the chair and how you are sitting but it doesn’t disappear or “go in” * leaning over while sitting down (aka when MM was at Mayhew and leaned down to pet a dog on the floor) — not possible without changing how you are sitting to allow for the bump * bump appearance over 4 day period — the bump doesn’t magically become larger/smaller throughout the day, doesn’t move higher/lower, and overall shape doesn’t really change. Only thing my cousin noted was that she does carry a bit lower at night after running around all day, which makes sense Lol

by Anonymousreply 325May 3, 2019 10:52 AM

I love the photo of Marilyn Monroe curtsying to the Queen. Her Maj looks quite captivated.

by Anonymousreply 326May 3, 2019 10:55 AM

R325 Oh well - that proves it then. Some random gets another random to perform a manoeuvre and when she supposedly can’t PROVES that Markle, the BRF, the medical profession and public servants in the form of registrars are all about to commit criminal fraud.

Your fellow lunatic Skippy is that way ——-> so just fuck off will you.

by Anonymousreply 327May 3, 2019 10:57 AM

R322, the video of Meghan crouching down to pick up a small dog would be impossible to do with knees together if she had a real baby in there.

Try it yourself with a throw pillow against your abdomen. (Knees tightly together, remember). Then imagine there’s a four-pound person surrounded by fluid and a muscular sac lodged in there with your internal organs, pressing up against your diaphragm.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 328May 3, 2019 10:59 AM

R323 I love Mette-Marit's curtsy, Eugenie looks like she's taking a dump.

by Anonymousreply 329May 3, 2019 11:04 AM

Curtsies look a lot better in a gown or 1950s dress.

by Anonymousreply 330May 3, 2019 11:04 AM

Yes, Mette-Marit looks like a ballerina. Autumn Phillips looks very awkward. Diana did well considering those long legs she had to maneuver.

by Anonymousreply 331May 3, 2019 11:07 AM

Diana looks like a colt trying to curtsey.

by Anonymousreply 332May 3, 2019 11:09 AM

As much as I adore HM, I believed eve that Americans shouldn’t curtsy to her.

by Anonymousreply 333May 3, 2019 11:11 AM

R328 ‘s video - I’ve seen linked on other sites pointing out the “popping” sound around 9s and Meghan checking her bump right after. I do think she’s pregnant so please don’t start yelling at me. I just find myself kinda thinking maybe she is padding because she announced super early at Eugenie’s wedding.

by Anonymousreply 334May 3, 2019 11:19 AM

Catherine looks like she desperately has to pee when she curtsies. It reminds me of little kids doing a pee dance to try and keep it in.

by Anonymousreply 335May 3, 2019 11:25 AM

R328, in that screen grab, the dog is thinking “PLEASE don’t let this woman adopt me! I’d rather stay in a shelter!”

by Anonymousreply 336May 3, 2019 11:28 AM

R328 - method acting really isn't MM's forte.

by Anonymousreply 337May 3, 2019 11:29 AM

Everybody is fleeing out of the country when baby Frog will be dropped . 😂

by Anonymousreply 338May 3, 2019 11:30 AM

Let's face it, salad tossing was and remains MM's one real forte. That she parlayed it into become a full-fledged member of the BRF is all kinds of astounding.

by Anonymousreply 339May 3, 2019 11:30 AM

God, this tradition of curtsying looks so ridiculous in the modern world.

by Anonymousreply 340May 3, 2019 11:31 AM

Just goes to show that Harry's got a cock for brains R 339.

by Anonymousreply 341May 3, 2019 11:40 AM

R339 , sorry.

by Anonymousreply 342May 3, 2019 11:40 AM

Old Cauliflower Face has a film to promote.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 343May 3, 2019 11:43 AM

Wow, Elton John got huge.

by Anonymousreply 344May 3, 2019 11:44 AM

And the female Mike Tyson has a *cough* clothing line to promote.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 345May 3, 2019 11:51 AM

R322 So, if I try and do it with a pillow but can’t - how the fuck do you think Markle can do it with a moonbump?

(And I’m not going to bother as I am not as sad and invested as you).

You’re an idiot.

She’s pregnant. Yes, she may have been padding at the start for attention, but that she is pregnant is a fact.

by Anonymousreply 346May 3, 2019 11:54 AM

I agree that Americans shouldn’t curtsey to the the Queen (unless they especially want to, but why would they?).

When a Brit does it it’s supposed to signify respect for the office, not the human being embodying it.

I also think that the monarch should be the only person curtsied/bowed to. Although, in theory, any curtseys aimed at the others are for her by proxy, that plastic-faced, boss-eyed tart won’t have the humility to see it like that...and watching her gracefully “accept’ such honours makes me want to puke. Nobody should have to grovel at the feet of a cunt who is only there because she opened her legs for the right man.

by Anonymousreply 347May 3, 2019 12:02 PM

r327 I didn't realise we were dealing with the pregnancy expert, who knows how pregnancy works without having going through it. It's interesting that when someone provides you with someone (on the internet) talking about how their cousin couldn't bend like MM they are a skippy lunatic. Why don't you go and accost a pregnant woman on the street and ask her to bend for you. You are the one who questioned why it was an issue. As you don't trust people on the internet, there are plenty of people in the "real world" you could engaging with.

by Anonymousreply 348May 3, 2019 12:02 PM

Oh dear, R348 - I have been through it, four times.

Stop embarrassing yourself and go shove another cream cake in your fat, unemployed gob.

by Anonymousreply 349May 3, 2019 12:04 PM

If these ladies really want to quell rumours about not actually being preggers they should follow my lead and give the papers the exposed truth..

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 350May 3, 2019 12:09 PM

Fraus everywhere, and I'm lying here naked!

by Anonymousreply 351May 3, 2019 12:09 PM

From a supporting role on basic cable to Elton John performing at your wedding reception. Heady stuff.

by Anonymousreply 352May 3, 2019 12:11 PM

Meghan is going to shake up the BRF and break the internet by livestreaming the birth from her joint Instagram account with Prince Harry!

by Anonymousreply 353May 3, 2019 12:22 PM

Why isn't Anne her parents favourite? Who is Philip close to?

by Anonymousreply 354May 3, 2019 12:40 PM

R266 - It does when it comes to the BRF. Adoptees are barred from the line of succession. Period. End of.

by Anonymousreply 355May 3, 2019 12:52 PM

We're waiting so long, I almost don't care any more!

by Anonymousreply 356May 3, 2019 1:07 PM

R323, loved the curtsies. Thanks!

I remember Chris Evert curtsying to Princess Michael at Wimbledon.

by Anonymousreply 357May 3, 2019 1:08 PM

Oh poor R346. I never thought Markle would be pregnant for so long that the ones who insist that "She is actually really PREGNANT guys!!! She is just padding!!!! OK?!" Would be the ones who are winding up looking like the real tin hatters. LMAO.

by Anonymousreply 358May 3, 2019 1:09 PM

So Gayle King is on her way over, or has landed. I wonder how much Little Bean's getting paid for this?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 359May 3, 2019 1:15 PM

Gayle King in now being referred to as a "close friend" of Meghan, even though there's nothing to suggest they knew each other before the wedding shower. Gayle was in London to cover the wedding for CBS, but wasn't invited to the wedding or reception. Gayle is, however, a close friend of Oprah.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 360May 3, 2019 1:16 PM

The baby shower must have been like a strategy meeting. How charming.

by Anonymousreply 361May 3, 2019 1:21 PM

Interesting question-what are Philip's relationships like with his children? Does he have relationships with them at all? Given his racist, rowdy past, he seems like a fairly awful person. He's like the creeper uncle who makes racist jokes at family get-togethers and stares at women's cleavage but gets a pass because he's old and that's just how he is.

by Anonymousreply 362May 3, 2019 1:25 PM

For all you comic book fans:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 363May 3, 2019 1:25 PM

He married Demi Moore?

by Anonymousreply 364May 3, 2019 1:28 PM

Anne is Phil's favorite child.

by Anonymousreply 365May 3, 2019 1:28 PM

That comic book, lol, one of the reviews....

"I had bought this for my nieces. It was not appropriate."

Wonder what's in it? Haha.

by Anonymousreply 366May 3, 2019 1:31 PM

R362, he's a bully and an asshole who thinks he's better than everyone else. He apparently bullied Charles throughout Charles' entire childhood because Charles was chubby and not tough enough. I've read that even when Charles was an adult, Philip would berate him until he broke down in tears.

Anne is his favorite child, and Edward is supposedly his favorite son, even though Edward dropped out of the military after a short time and wanted to pursue a career in theatre.

by Anonymousreply 367May 3, 2019 1:33 PM

God, Phil sounds like a nightmare. No wonder Charles turned out the way he did. Makes me reevaluate HM a bit. Obviously she either condoned his behavior or just didn't give a fuck how he treated her children. She has stayed so sphynx-like throughout the years, we really don't know much about her other than the tidbits like she's fond of corgis, horses and the evening tipple of champagne.

by Anonymousreply 368May 3, 2019 1:37 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 369May 3, 2019 1:40 PM

The writer in this article is insightful and well summarizes the messy HazBean circus.

"So, true love? Nah. Sheer desperation on both parts? Most definitely."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 370May 3, 2019 1:40 PM

R368 - since she was THE QUEEN which means she took precedence over him in public, he was given full authority over the family. Not the best decision she's ever made but understandable to keep the peace with a man such as Philip.

by Anonymousreply 371May 3, 2019 1:42 PM

R369 - "We don't speak to people that in this family" says the Queen to Meghan. Love it.

by Anonymousreply 372May 3, 2019 1:44 PM

R368, the Crown touched on the situation in a couple of episodes. One episode showed Philip yelling at a young Charles, and the Queen Mother tells the Queen that "Philip isn't settled. He's taking it out on the boy, and it isn't fair." Then in a later episode, Philip is shown treating Charles (about 11 years old) like crap as they ride home in a helicopter, yelling at him in front of the servants (who discreetly try to de-escalate the situation). When they arrive home, the Queen can tell that the boy is upset and wants to get away from his father, but she hesitates and then decides not to comfort him. They're lucky that Charles even still talks to them.

by Anonymousreply 373May 3, 2019 1:45 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 374May 3, 2019 1:45 PM

[quote]Edward is supposedly his favorite son, even though Edward dropped out of the military after a short time and wanted to pursue a career in theater.

Theater, really?

How you doin?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 375May 3, 2019 1:46 PM

The horrors-I CAN TASTE EGG!!!!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 376May 3, 2019 1:47 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 377May 3, 2019 1:50 PM

Author Katie Nicholl told how the former actress had insisted on there being a 'macrobiotic alternative' for some of the Hollywood star guests who follow the diet which derives from Zen Buddhism.

She told Yahoo's Royal Box: '[Meghan] got very upset when she felt that she could taste egg in a dish when she was told there was no egg in there, and she said, "No, I can taste it, I can taste there's egg in this dish."

'I think there was a bit of an upset when suddenly the Queen walked in, because of course, this was Windsor Castle, this is her home. And she just quietly took Meghan to the side and said, "Meghan, in this family we don't speak to people like that".'

by Anonymousreply 378May 3, 2019 2:05 PM

Re the blog at R370, If the marriage implodes spectacularly in a couple of years, Oprah, and to a lesser extent Gayle, will have positioned themselves to be Meghan's mouthpieces. A smart and mutually beneficial arrangement.

by Anonymousreply 379May 3, 2019 2:06 PM

Well, it’s easy for the Queen to say, the people in question would never be anything but respectful and obedient to her, and she never met with any other attitude since birth. I bet it was hard for Meghan when everybody were sneering behind her back and lying to her face “Egg? There is no egg in this dish, Miss.” Good for her for standing up for herself.

by Anonymousreply 380May 3, 2019 2:07 PM

Thanks for that poster who posted that pic of her at someone's wedding being nasty to a wait staff. And now this story about her being nasty to another wait staff. She is a fucking CUNT. She thinks she's hot shit, she's a fucking low class whore, nothing more.

There will be more stories about her. Lots and lots of people will quit in very near future. And she will have a hard time finding a nanny.

by Anonymousreply 381May 3, 2019 2:11 PM

I'm surprised MM is nasty to wait staff, they could sneeze into her food and who knows what else in future...she better watch it lol.

by Anonymousreply 382May 3, 2019 2:12 PM

Her face looked like thunder in those Caribbean wedding photos.

by Anonymousreply 383May 3, 2019 2:17 PM

Men like Prince Philip should NEVER have children. They don't seem to understand that each child is different and each requires different parenting skills to deal with them. A sensitive child should NEVER be bullied (Charles/Edward). An outgoing and fearless child (Princess Anne/Prince Andrew) can take a bit of aggression. It takes a lot of intelligence and emotional maturity to figure it out and Philip's own upbringing may have contributed to his lack of empathy.

by Anonymousreply 384May 3, 2019 2:20 PM

R380 = delusional much?

Thank you for my Friday laugh.

by Anonymousreply 385May 3, 2019 2:21 PM

Did she ever work as a food server? Most struggling actors in Hollywood have been food servers or have held other service-related jobs (retail) to make ends meet between acting gigs. If she has, then she should be more sympathetic to people who are in that line of work.

by Anonymousreply 386May 3, 2019 2:21 PM

Princess Eugenie wishes her hubby Jack a Happy Birthday! My God, those big teeth.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 387May 3, 2019 2:22 PM

The late Queen Mum as a child with her brother David. They were the youngest of 10 children.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 388May 3, 2019 2:24 PM

The Queen Mother was the daughter of the parlour maid!

by Anonymousreply 389May 3, 2019 2:28 PM

Kilt and cute alert at Windsor!!! The Changing of the Guard comes with Shetland pony.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 390May 3, 2019 2:28 PM

'[Meghan] got very upset when she felt that she could taste egg in a dish when she was told there was no egg in there, and she said, "No, I can taste it, I can taste there's egg in this dish."

I can imagine MM's cunty, bithcy voice yapping at a helper, like when she bitched behind the back of a woman who didn't like the bag MM picked for her.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 391May 3, 2019 2:30 PM

R386, it seems MM sponged off her parents instead of working the usual struggling actor jobs.

She is described as living with Doria after college. This was after Doria stole her deceased fathers house from (Doris’s) half brother.

And Thomas claims he paid her other bills until she moved in with Trevor.

It seems our MM is quite the little grifter skank with little work history. It’s why it annoys me so much when she’s described as a “perfectionist” or “type A.”

She’s just a rude, mouthy asshole who sort of oozed around LA for 15 years. NOT some focused high achieving dynamo.

by Anonymousreply 392May 3, 2019 2:30 PM

Photos of Canadian-born Autumn Phillips, daughter-in-law to Princess Anne. Hers is another birthday to celebrate in May. She can be quite stylish.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 393May 3, 2019 2:32 PM

R392, wow, it sounds like she thought she was "too good" for service jobs.

I consider service jobs a right-of-passage, even for those who won't making a living in the field. For example, if I were in charge of a corporation, I probably wouldn't hire someone who never served the public in a store or restaurant, regardless of how much education they have.

by Anonymousreply 394May 3, 2019 2:36 PM

They're very close. Cough, cough.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 395May 3, 2019 2:39 PM

Meghan skin looks terrible in R391 video.

by Anonymousreply 396May 3, 2019 2:40 PM

Peter and Autumn Phillips with Kate's sister Pippa and brother James Middleton.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 397May 3, 2019 2:40 PM

"One has to look one's best".

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 398May 3, 2019 2:42 PM

This dumb woman gave Princess Anne a gift for the Sussex baby.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 399May 3, 2019 2:44 PM

R380 - Among normal people, we don't call that "standing up" for oneself; it's actually bullying when you pick a fight with people of a lower ranking.

by Anonymousreply 400May 3, 2019 2:44 PM

It’s really the trashy rudeness and childish defiance that dives me nuts about MM. Anything else is pretty forgivable.

I could even feel sorry for her— narcissism that profound would have been forged under some pretty awful conditions. We don’t know much about that part of her life.

But then she has a shitfit about EGGS and I’m like, “fuck this skank.”

by Anonymousreply 401May 3, 2019 2:45 PM

Harry = animal killer. Meghan = fake vegan. What a match made in heaven!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 402May 3, 2019 2:46 PM

I love Princess Anne, she says it as it is even if it isn't the popular thing to say. She just gets on with things without any drama.

by Anonymousreply 403May 3, 2019 2:47 PM

WTF do people want to give gifts to baby that's among the richest 1% in the world? The baby will already have more than everything it needs, and the members of the RF and their attendants don't want to carry around some toy for several hours. They'll probably toss it in the trash the first chance they get. Or, they'll give it charity.

by Anonymousreply 404May 3, 2019 2:49 PM

Harry is not looking well. He must be going stir crazy with his bossy, heavily pregnant wife at home. She's probably more insufferable now than she's ever been. I wonder if Doria is having second thoughts on staying with her daughter? This is probably the LONGEST time she's been with her daughter in years. Has she pulled her cornrows out in frustration? Are her eyes opened yet?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 405May 3, 2019 2:51 PM

R399 - and Princess Anne's reaction to the gift for Baby Sussex:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 406May 3, 2019 2:57 PM

R404 that's what I found really annoying about Oprah's statement about giving a great gift to the baby as she really cares about the parents. Fuck off. That baby will never want for anything. How about throwing the cash to some starving orphans or refugee children in this child's honour?

by Anonymousreply 407May 3, 2019 3:00 PM

Is it me, or has this thread taken a fevered, noxious, witless turn?

(Cue the “fuck you cunt, take your Frogwhore stanning shit elsewhere” reply)

by Anonymousreply 408May 3, 2019 3:07 PM

Some of my favorite lines from this thread:

“No, I can taste it, I can taste there's egg in this dish.“ “Has she pulled her cornrows out in frustration?” “Gayle is, however, a close friend of Oprah.” “The bump doesn’t hang between the legs, so why wouldn’t someone be able to squat with legs together?”

by Anonymousreply 409May 3, 2019 3:07 PM

They are benefit scroungers and nothing else!

by Anonymousreply 410May 3, 2019 3:15 PM

Amsterdam trip has been cancelled.

by Anonymousreply 411May 3, 2019 3:17 PM

Fancy complaining about the taste of egg when you've a reputation for having your tongue in someones ass.

by Anonymousreply 412May 3, 2019 3:20 PM

[R411] Strange it was even organised in the first place.

by Anonymousreply 413May 3, 2019 3:22 PM

If I had done a tenth of what MM has, I would have had my pale, stale ass shipped back home eons ago. Meg does not have basic manners or show courtesy to others. What’s her excuse? Raised in tony Woodland Hills, CA. Now I can’t tell a knife from a fork, but I’m from lower-middle-class Brooklyn. Those of you who give Meg a pass because of her tint are the real patronizers.

by Anonymousreply 414May 3, 2019 3:23 PM

r413 Even strange the visit to The Hague is apparently still going ahead.

by Anonymousreply 415May 3, 2019 3:23 PM

Meghan's skin looks sun damaged. Freckles on her chest.

Sun block, girl!

by Anonymousreply 416May 3, 2019 3:24 PM

It's amazing to think how different the Royal family would be with any slight change. Eg: Princess Charlotte surviving childbirth = no Queen Victoria.

Prince Albert Victor surviving the flu = No George V, George VI or Elizabeth II.

by Anonymousreply 417May 3, 2019 3:27 PM

$ky story on the cancelled PH trip.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 418May 3, 2019 3:27 PM

"It is time for Harry and Meghan to stop seeing themselves as victims and to acknowledge the reality of their lives, the occasional awkward photo shoot and all."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 419May 3, 2019 3:28 PM

It's a bit weird that Harry's only cancelled the Amsterdam trip just now. Surely they knew the due date ages ago?

by Anonymousreply 420May 3, 2019 3:32 PM

The trip to Amsterdam should never have been scheduled until AFTER the baby was born. Methinks Sparkle Junior is LATE in arriving.

by Anonymousreply 421May 3, 2019 3:41 PM

The Dutchess of Susseggs.

[quote] '[Meghan] got very upset when she felt that she could taste egg in a dish when she was told there was no egg in there, and she said, "No, I can taste it, I can taste there's egg in this dish."

What a snotty bitch. No wonder NOBODY likes working for the hag and always end up quitting in short order. It's going to be a never ending revolving door of nannies for that poor kid. Still funny as hell the staff who made sure that tag stayed attached on the red dress for that walk off the plane.

by Anonymousreply 422May 3, 2019 3:45 PM

R420 - It's not weird that he's staying home, it's weird that they announced it at all, given that with his first child due momentarily he would even think about going. The palaces and PR staff clearly aren't talking to each other.

by Anonymousreply 423May 3, 2019 3:46 PM

The Duchess of Susseggs. (Amsterdam on the brain)

by Anonymousreply 424May 3, 2019 3:46 PM

yes, i doubt she was 12 weeks pregnant at Harry's cousin's wedding. She fucking stole the thunder and told everyone she was pregnant. How much of a attention whore do you have to be to do this at someone's wedding? And she only just joined the family at the time. No breeding, no class, that's what you get for marrying a commoner. That's what they are saying behind closed doors.

Even if you were raised in a barn, you would know not to do announce your news at someone's wedding.

by Anonymousreply 425May 3, 2019 3:54 PM

Richard Palmer ‏

@RoyalReporter 20m20 minutes ago

Chaos in the Royal Household: the Duke of Sussex has pulled out of a trip to Amsterdam next Wednesday, ostensibly because there are too many competing events involving other members of the family (Charles and Camilla in Germany; the Cambridges in North Wales).

by Anonymousreply 426May 3, 2019 3:57 PM

R425 - most commoners KNOW how to behave (treat everyone with respect). It's Meghan's character and personality which are the problems not the fact that she wasn't born with a title.

by Anonymousreply 427May 3, 2019 3:58 PM

But I read Harry is still going to The Hague, it was just Amsterdam he pulled out of, no?

by Anonymousreply 428May 3, 2019 3:59 PM

Richard Palmer also says -

Harry still plans to go to The Hague on Thursday to mark one year before the 2020 Invictus Games - but that will depend on what happens with the baby

by Anonymousreply 429May 3, 2019 3:59 PM

R426 - it just shows what a shit storm the Sussex houshold really is. Aren't the PR offices aware of other royal engagements? That's the first thing you should do. Duh.

by Anonymousreply 430May 3, 2019 4:00 PM

R425 - As has been the case since Meghan first came on the scene, her PR has been absurdly off, starting with getting Harry to threaten the UK press a year before they were even engaged. For all the bullshit about privacy, she's managed to turn this into another media circus about her and her life, when sticking the tried and true media circus - i.e., five minutes on the steps of the Lindo Wing - would have limited the circus to one day.

She never manages to miss an opportunity to prove that she really isn't a narcissistic famewhore - because at every bend in the road she takes exactly the tactic that proves that she IS a narcissistic famewhore.

by Anonymousreply 431May 3, 2019 4:02 PM

It's only 1hr 30min away...what's the big deal? She will be in labor for a longgggg time.

Wait, so home birth means no painkillers? She's gonna be screaming her head off. Harry is gonna be needing many drinks to deal with it all.

by Anonymousreply 432May 3, 2019 4:02 PM

The "Sussex household" is comprised of little more than control-freak MEghistan trying to micro-manage everything.

by Anonymousreply 433May 3, 2019 4:02 PM

To me, she's the low class American fame whore. She aims not only to be bigger than Kate but bigger than Diana. Fat hope!

by Anonymousreply 434May 3, 2019 4:04 PM

R433 - We don't know that it will be a home birth, and if it is, you may be sure that the best physicians will be on hand in case anything goes wrong, with a helicopter/ambulance/escort nearby ready to whisk her off to one of those hospitals she's sneered at, with every piece of equipment near to hand - including pain management drugs if she needs them. Home births, contrary to popular opinion, do not preclude painkillers like spinal blocks.

by Anonymousreply 435May 3, 2019 4:07 PM

Didn't MEghan brag how she was going to "work" up until she was about to deliver? Instead, she's been on maternity leave longer than any of Catherine's three pregnancies prior to birth. Just another bold-faced lie among a multitude she makes up with her lame-ass PR.

by Anonymousreply 436May 3, 2019 4:12 PM

One of the comments on Richard Palmer's tweet at R429 about Harry pulling out of Amsterdam trip:

[quote] He should have “pulled out” much earlier.

by Anonymousreply 437May 3, 2019 4:12 PM

According to Nicholl, Meghan was reproved by HM on the "egg" dish issue: "The Duchess of Sussex, 37, visited Windsor Castle in run up to Royal Wedding to taste the food, and complained after tasting 'egg' in a macrobiotic dish, much to the Queen's disapproval, according to royal author Katie Nicholl. She said Her Majesty told Meghan 'we don't speak to people like that in this family'."

I'm sure the fraus on Celebitchy, who absolutely accepted that the Queen sent Meghan an adoring letter of admiration a few months ago on absolutely no evidence, will reject this as another "smear" on the fucking psycho bitch the BRF let in because there's no evidence.

by Anonymousreply 438May 3, 2019 4:13 PM

There was never any official engagement released for Amsterdam, it was described as a " secret engagement". He was probably going to Soho House Amsterdam, they were both there for the opening. She's probably decided that he's " Not Allowed! " ( barking voice), so the Handbag is just doing the official engagement in The Hague, with no jollies thrown in.

by Anonymousreply 439May 3, 2019 4:13 PM

R437 - "One of the comments on Richard Palmer's tweet at [R429] about Harry pulling out of Amsterdam trip:

"He should have “pulled out” much earlier."

Oh, that IS delicious!

by Anonymousreply 440May 3, 2019 4:14 PM

Duchess of Suckseggs

Egghan Markle

"No, I can taste it, I can taste there's egg in this dish." God what a fucking cunt.

by Anonymousreply 441May 3, 2019 4:16 PM

Yes, imagine. The kitchen staff who made the food actually told her there were no eggs in the recipe. Duchess Yoko more or less accused them of lying. Oh dear.

by Anonymousreply 442May 3, 2019 4:25 PM

Jane here, keeping a particular eye today on R325.

by Anonymousreply 443May 3, 2019 4:26 PM

Does anyone know what food ingredient chefs use instead of eggs that may taste similar to eggs?

by Anonymousreply 444May 3, 2019 4:26 PM

These are gorgeous photos of QEII and her family.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 445May 3, 2019 4:28 PM

Charles is STILL in Scotland.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 446May 3, 2019 4:28 PM

Photos of Princess Anne at the Whitley Awards.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 447May 3, 2019 4:31 PM

Anne goes to France, next week, William and Kate to Wales, Harry to The Hague, and Charles and Camilla continue their tour of Scotland. Everyone's getting the hell out of there.

by Anonymousreply 448May 3, 2019 4:33 PM

....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 449May 3, 2019 4:33 PM

R328, and those heels!

by Anonymousreply 450May 3, 2019 4:33 PM

The 'family she never had' running for the hills R448

by Anonymousreply 451May 3, 2019 4:35 PM

Her Maj has a winning smile.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 452May 3, 2019 4:37 PM

....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 453May 3, 2019 4:38 PM

....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 454May 3, 2019 4:40 PM

You can replace eggs pretty easily with a branded vegan egg replacement.

You can use lots of other weird mixtures, but that is about the easiest.

It does taste like egg though.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 455May 3, 2019 4:43 PM

I'm not sure anyone could have predicted that this thread would turn into a discussion of egg substitutes.

by Anonymousreply 456May 3, 2019 4:49 PM

Would anyone have predicted for the BRF in this day and age how farcical this whole pregnancy has been?

by Anonymousreply 457May 3, 2019 4:58 PM

I didn't come here for recipes.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 458May 3, 2019 4:58 PM

What a pretentious twat she is.

She thinks she’s some authority on food (because she fucked a chef) so I can just imagine her getting all heated about what she can/can’t taste.

Insisting that she can taste something the chefs say isn’t there is her basically calling them liars.

Cunt.

by Anonymousreply 459May 3, 2019 5:00 PM

There were articles saying MM "the feminist" would work until the day she gave birth.

She hasn't been seen in public for almost two months.... and no baby yet as far as anyone knows.

by Anonymousreply 460May 3, 2019 5:00 PM

She’s a parvenu, and she knows it. And like all ignorant, jumped-up nobodies she thinks being rude to people makes her sound important.

by Anonymousreply 461May 3, 2019 5:02 PM

i bet she's had a lot of complications already, that's why she hasn't been seen in public, for all you know, she's been ordered to rest in bed by doctors. And she still wants home birth. Stupid cunt. matches well with Royal idiot.

by Anonymousreply 462May 3, 2019 5:09 PM

I wish the queen would tell her and harry off about the celebrity chasing. And I hope it becomes public news to embarrass oprah and her ilk.

by Anonymousreply 463May 3, 2019 5:10 PM

If they were going to chastise her for socializing with celebrities, it would have occurred after the celebrity baby shower. I doubt she'll drop her newfound close friends regardless. It's not a stretch to believe that socializing with the likes of Oprah and George Clooney is a dream come true for her.

by Anonymousreply 464May 3, 2019 5:17 PM

I love that the family Sparkles never had will be busy working.

by Anonymousreply 465May 3, 2019 5:18 PM

George IV's tableware is so decadent!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 466May 3, 2019 5:20 PM

Will there be no coverage of the Royal Victorian Order service at St. George's today? I thought it would have at least been mentioned since Kate has been made a Dame Grand Cross.

by Anonymousreply 467May 3, 2019 5:24 PM

Do you think Camilla and Chuck still fuck?

by Anonymousreply 468May 3, 2019 5:25 PM

R466, you could feed several countries for the cost of that tableware.

by Anonymousreply 469May 3, 2019 5:26 PM

Oh my, Keira Knightley is pregnant again. Will we be treated to another graphic description of her birth experience?

by Anonymousreply 470May 3, 2019 5:29 PM

^sorry, wrong thread

by Anonymousreply 471May 3, 2019 5:30 PM

Sadly they do not film nor release photos of the ceremony for the Royal Victorian Order.

by Anonymousreply 472May 3, 2019 5:33 PM

My goodness, this perma-preg royal interloping Negresse certainly has the people all in arms! (As they should be, because...well, you know. I mean, can you even JUST? One of the Conquered, in THE ROYAL FAMILY?!)

by Anonymousreply 473May 3, 2019 5:37 PM

R473 - what language are you speaking?

by Anonymousreply 474May 3, 2019 5:41 PM

Did anyone remember reading the story from her ghosted mate about some of the wedding activities in Jamaica, when she married Trevor? She had a list of games to be played, at set times through the day , really childish games. It read that she was screaming at people to join in, as she'd planned it all meticulously. But she looked a mess. So her plans are made in stone and people must adhere... and what I can't figure out is...why cannot she apply that much energy in to her personal grooming?

by Anonymousreply 475May 3, 2019 5:43 PM

R468 - yes, occasionally. Camilla needs to keep Charles' heart pumping so it doesn't clog up.

by Anonymousreply 476May 3, 2019 5:46 PM

R468 Many older couples are able to enjoy an active sex life, thanks to a class of medications, phosphodiesterase inhibitors (such as Viagra). In addition, since Camilla is post menopause, she would need to use a lubricant designed to be used specifically for the postmenopausal vagina, as the vaginal tissue becomes more friable once estrogen production drops.

by Anonymousreply 477May 3, 2019 5:50 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 478May 3, 2019 5:51 PM

* lashes prawn salad in the bin *

by Anonymousreply 479May 3, 2019 5:51 PM

I believe Meghan Markle is pregnant, just to get that out of the way. But at this point I also believe she 'announced' early - prior to 12 weeks - at Eugenie's wedding. Because that was an announcement the moment she got out of the vehicle in that coat. So she REALLY went out of her way to upstage the bride that day, which is just extra tacky given the fact that MM is obviously more popular with the media than Yuge anyway. MM isn't a good person.

Also lol at all the 'she's going to work up until her due date' salivating that took place a few months ago in certain stannish quarters of the internet. 50 days now? And come on, we all know why. Check those pics in the cream dress from their Morocco visit - she was already awkwardly heavy and lumpy by that point. It's vanity and nothing more that has kept the woman who loves cameras and attention like fat kids love cake out of the public eye for the past 7 weeks now.

by Anonymousreply 480May 3, 2019 5:53 PM

>>>She’s a parvenu, and she knows it. And like all ignorant, jumped-up nobodies she thinks being rude to people makes her sound important.

That and also because she probably senses people's contempt for her, whether for who she is or what she does. The British have a finely developed mode for showing disdain whilst appearing perfectly polite.

by Anonymousreply 481May 3, 2019 5:54 PM

Blind leading the blind seems the standard operating procedure in the Sussex household. What a royal mess. Fucking amateur hour with HazBean.

by Anonymousreply 482May 3, 2019 5:56 PM

I agree that she didn't want to be seen publicly or photographed late in her pregnancy, R480, but I'm sure our Duchess of Instagram has been taking meetings behind closed doors these last 50 days. She hustles and she really can't help herself. It's one of her better qualities.

by Anonymousreply 483May 3, 2019 6:00 PM

Her only hustle is trying to break the internet with that stupid @Sussexroyal IG. Must be killing her that for all her ballin' it hasn't beat KP's followers. In fact, since it's been created KP numbers went on to increase over 8 million.

by Anonymousreply 484May 3, 2019 6:04 PM

I’m confused. Have the “fake pregnancy” trolls now decided that Meghan is really pregnant but extremely vain?

I personally thought she was faking it, but the vitriol of some of the people on this board is a bit much.

by Anonymousreply 485May 3, 2019 6:05 PM

Baby has been birthed.

by Anonymousreply 486May 3, 2019 6:07 PM

R485 I never thought she was faking a pregnancy, but yes, I do believe that vanity is the main reason she hasn't been seen in public for 50 days.

by Anonymousreply 487May 3, 2019 6:08 PM

Were you there, R486?

by Anonymousreply 488May 3, 2019 6:08 PM

No one really has any idea R485. It could be anything. MEghan is notorious for playing fast and loose with the truth.

The whole thing is very weird, like her fashion sense. Poor kid will never live down its parents botching its birth.

by Anonymousreply 489May 3, 2019 6:09 PM

If this is true, we'll be seeing not only a lot more of Eug, but Bea, too. Everything that Andy has been fighting for. Could this be the banishment coming into fruition for Yoko and her Handbag?

Blind Items Revealed #4 April 23, 2019

Two more royals added to the bald man's team. All it took was an annual "stipend," of a little over $100K. That also brought their parents firmly to his side.

Prince William/Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 490May 3, 2019 6:10 PM

Thanks, R487. I just came here to discuss the royals in general. I’m trying to stay out of the really impassioned anti-Meghan posts.

by Anonymousreply 491May 3, 2019 6:11 PM

I agree R484 that the IG account is being handled mainly by her and has been since its inception. This isn't to say it's impossible that she could be working on anything else (i.e. charitable endeavours). I personally believe the main work of the royals is just showing up somewhere, smiling for the cameras etc.

by Anonymousreply 492May 3, 2019 6:11 PM

You don't have to like her to acknowledge that she works on her patronages and so forth.

by Anonymousreply 493May 3, 2019 6:14 PM

R493 - just remember she only has 4 royal patronages thus far. Not much work.

by Anonymousreply 494May 3, 2019 6:18 PM

r493 How does she work on her patronages and so forth, exactly? All I've seen is self promotion and she has stopped following her patronages on instagram to promote private US businesses.

by Anonymousreply 495May 3, 2019 6:19 PM

The thing is, none of us really know whatever work she does. R493 is making a statement from thin air. From what I have seen, her meetings (like the womens conference) is little more than her paying lip service talking over everyone telling them how they should think and live their lives, but mostly making the conversation about herself.

by Anonymousreply 496May 3, 2019 6:21 PM

It's hard work following pages on Instagram, connecting with hasbeen American celebs, and composing on noxious captions that don't even try to appear british.

Truly an exmple for the working class woman

by Anonymousreply 497May 3, 2019 6:21 PM

Well, she's not bothering with her patronages now, she has friends to promote, or business deals to fulfill . Check out who she is following. They aren't all true mental health charities.....

*Bye smelly pooches...I'm soooo over you now *

by Anonymousreply 498May 3, 2019 6:22 PM

The narcissism and lack of self awareness from meghan and her celeb friends is astonishing. These people would not want to be her friend if she wasn't in the royal family. And to actually say with a straight face they have a friendship is nonsense. They don't know each other!

by Anonymousreply 499May 3, 2019 6:25 PM

R493 Do you even know what a patronage is? There’s no “work” to do.

The actual work is done by the experts...the patron shows up at events and has their name on the letterhead.

The Queen has has hundreds. How much “work” do you think she does for them? If Markle showed up and started trying to work at these organisations , it would look absurd since she’s in no way qualified.

Get a clue.

by Anonymousreply 500May 3, 2019 6:27 PM

Fergie wishes her son-in-law "Handsome Jack" a Happy Birthday.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 501May 3, 2019 6:35 PM

Lol, my mother is like that about my partner too, on social media. Bloody cringe, but cute.

by Anonymousreply 502May 3, 2019 6:38 PM

Harry must be disgusted by her treatment of servers. I remember an old article from years back that described Diana and Harry's lunch date with Paul McCartney. Apparently, the server brought out Harry's food, and it wasn't quite what he had ordered. He asked his mother if he could complain to the server, and his mother told him to eat it anyway instead of making things complicated for the server.

It seems reasonable to ask for a correction when your order is wrong, but I guess that Diana didn't want to inspire rumors that she (or Harry) was difficult.

by Anonymousreply 503May 3, 2019 6:38 PM

I was just looking through some of my sisters photos when she was about 7.5 months pregnant. She wasn’t especially fit before or during pregnancy, but she’s about Markle’s height and size.

My sister at 7.5 months basically looks like she has a little gut. This used to piss her off endlessly because people just thought she got chubby— not pregnant.

Then I look at MM, who was supposedly super fit pre pregnancy. At 7.5 months when she went on leave, she was HUUUUUUUUUGE. Hell, she was HUUUUUUUUGE during the Morocco trip. I’ve never seen anything like it.

She is or was pregnant, but the timelines are very weird.

And, to get that big, there was some food binging on a regular basis. The size came from somewhere and if it were all bloat, she would have had heart issues (maybe she has.)

by Anonymousreply 504May 3, 2019 6:40 PM

That blind item makes me laugh, R490. It’s got Imelda Markle’s petty, mean-spirited stamp all over it.

Besides, would the “bald man” need to pay the Yorks a single cent to get them on his “team”? I’m sure the coat stunt at Eugenie’s wedding made them hate her free of charge,

As for ME-Again’s digs at Will’s baldness....people in glass houses (or cheap extensions, in this case) shouldn’t throw stones.

by Anonymousreply 505May 3, 2019 6:41 PM

Phil acting like he's going to catch baby cooties from baby Prince Charles and shit. The Queen is like "WTF, Phil? No one's going to think you a Buggerer for holding your own kid!" Baby Charles is like "Who the hell ARE these people?"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 506May 3, 2019 6:48 PM

I just started remembered the episode of Banzai in which they used a Princess Diana doll to determine whether or not the Queen and Philip were still having sex. They attached the doll to a parachute and threw it out of a hot air balloon to see whether it would land on the side of the ground marked "Still Doing It Proper" or "Not Doing It Proper". Tragically, I can't find it on YouTube.

by Anonymousreply 507May 3, 2019 6:48 PM

R501 That is Jack, bartender extraordinaire and purveyor of fine tequila. No wonder Eugene is hustling so much these days with her "patronages", no doubt spurred by pervie Andy. Hustling tequila is fun, but it don't pay the bills!

by Anonymousreply 508May 3, 2019 6:49 PM

And Beatrice, the more unfortunate looking one, is now latched on to a Eurotrash grifter with a one year old son...Oh dear. Well, Beatrice has had two excellent role models from which to master the art of grifting.

by Anonymousreply 509May 3, 2019 6:51 PM

R503 Diana was one hell of a complicated woman. She was a good person in terms like that and letters she wrote to people showed she had a big heart and did care and her charity work was genuine. But the other side of her was demonic. She could be vicious and had no problem being the third person in another couple marriage or relationship.

by Anonymousreply 510May 3, 2019 6:51 PM

Chris Evans says the Sussex spawn has dropped.

by Anonymousreply 511May 3, 2019 6:52 PM

Talking of Hustling Andy, more of the Windsors.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 512May 3, 2019 6:52 PM

The Yorks should be glad to take the gig for $100,000 a year. Beatrice is supposedly a consultant (!?), so she can set her own hours around the royal gigs. Eugenie has what appears to be a legitimate job, but she apparently gets 3 days off a week. Imagine a job where a limo picks you up and takes you to places where everyone is happy to see you. You probably get free food at some of those events, too.

by Anonymousreply 513May 3, 2019 6:54 PM

Chris Evans is another ginger crank.

by Anonymousreply 514May 3, 2019 6:58 PM

R503 Love those little stories.

R409, must say 100k doesn't sound like much to me, not in those circles.

by Anonymousreply 515May 3, 2019 7:05 PM

One thing it seems Diana never, ever did was put on airs or demand special treatment. Good goods she was.

by Anonymousreply 516May 3, 2019 7:06 PM

Dare I say it? Willis has finally accepted his fate. He's doing his Windsor thing impressively today. He's Kingly, he is.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 517May 3, 2019 7:13 PM

Linda Sparkle is fighting the good fight.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 518May 3, 2019 7:14 PM

See?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 519May 3, 2019 7:14 PM

R493 - Yes writing "YOU ARE STRONG" "YOU ARE BRAVE" on bananas is such a hard work. LOL

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 520May 3, 2019 7:17 PM

Why would William need to bribe the Yorks to get them on his "team"? They're pretty irrelevant, really. And I suspect that Andrew and Fergie in particular are probably still annoyed that Meghan announced her pregnancy at Eugenie's wedding.

by Anonymousreply 521May 3, 2019 7:18 PM

Royal correspondent James Whittaker once said that Diana was the least snobby person he had ever met, unlike her brother Charles and sister Sarah.

by Anonymousreply 522May 3, 2019 7:21 PM

Will seems to be coming into his own, as the poster upthread said, accepting his fate, even embracing it. Partly age, becoming a father, but maybe also feeling a little bit of a threat to his rightful inheritance and all that it means has made him value it more.

Michael Corleone never wanted to enter the family business, but when the family business was under siege, boy did he step up.

by Anonymousreply 523May 3, 2019 7:24 PM

One notable narcissistic trait:

Any time they enter a new social or work environment, they IMMEDIATELY think it’s their role to “tell them how things should be done.” I’ve seen it over and over in work and social situations. This seems to fit with how Markle has handled things.

I don’t know if they think they are being helpful or what it looks like from the narcissist’s point of view. But I wonder.

by Anonymousreply 524May 3, 2019 7:27 PM

Isn’t Bea part of the SoHo House crowd? We’ve discussed it before, but I recall a version of the Harkle “meet-cute” story was that they had met thanks to one of the York girls (I get them confused).

by Anonymousreply 525May 3, 2019 7:28 PM

100K is great, it's like getting a bit of pocket money for exposure and press. And to keep your dad happy. "On side"....well.....the Yorks were/still maybe are regulars at all things Soho. Pocket money for spilling the really filthy, nasty , trashy and perverted beans on Bean. Bring it on, I say!

by Anonymousreply 526May 3, 2019 7:29 PM

Cross posted about Soho, R525. Seemingly all roads lead to Soho.....

by Anonymousreply 527May 3, 2019 7:29 PM

And Hazza has been barky " Not Allowed! " from going to Amsterdam next week...unofficial engagement at Soho House? The dirty ticket.

by Anonymousreply 528May 3, 2019 7:30 PM

R524, yes. It’s part of the “high roller” mentality. They will never walk into a hotel room and pour themselves a drink and relax. They will never accept a plate of food at a restaurant and begin eating.

They inspect until they find something “wrong” and demand something better.

Because they are special and not going to accept just anything happily, the way the plebes do. They have STANDARDS and sneer at the poor clucks who don’t know any better.

by Anonymousreply 529May 3, 2019 7:33 PM

“YOU CALL THIS MACROBIOTIC? I TASTE EGGS”

by Anonymousreply 530May 3, 2019 7:34 PM

From one of the links up thread about Sparkle and Dim .....

[quote] they wanted to be the international jetsetters of the Royal family.

Who, I wonder, did they expect to pay for their Jetsetting?

Anyone care to make a guess?

by Anonymousreply 531May 3, 2019 7:38 PM

So today is precisely 200 days since the official announcement, almost 29 weeks. If she'd had the 12 week scan previous to telling the family..

by Anonymousreply 532May 3, 2019 7:49 PM

I can’t believe the absurd shit show this pregnancy has devolved into. If anyone had ever told me this would happen to the BRF, I would have told them to buy better quality crack.

by Anonymousreply 533May 3, 2019 7:52 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 534May 3, 2019 7:58 PM

I bet they’re trying to get her to agree to be induced and she’s refusing.

Doria must be beside herself.

by Anonymousreply 535May 3, 2019 8:04 PM

There was a period when William was devastatingly handsome, and then he lost his hair and dad danced and seemed to relinquish his dazzle to his younger hotter brother. Now with William asserting himself as the de facto alpha king, he’s regained his hotness, while Harry has devolved into resembling some sort of weasel-like rodent. The seesaw of the desire quotients between these two is quite capricious.

by Anonymousreply 536May 3, 2019 8:05 PM

R534, Harry looks so much like Charles there

by Anonymousreply 537May 3, 2019 8:07 PM

I imagine the home birth will sound like the McNeill house when the exorcist enters.

by Anonymousreply 538May 3, 2019 8:10 PM

Agree, r534.

by Anonymousreply 539May 3, 2019 8:11 PM

Whoops. ^^ Agreeing with r536.

by Anonymousreply 540May 3, 2019 8:11 PM

Just put a plunger on her fanny!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 541May 3, 2019 8:16 PM

The latest from Omid Scobie.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 542May 3, 2019 8:16 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 543May 3, 2019 8:26 PM

The article in DM states that Harry's trip to Amsterdam was canceled due to "logistical challenges". WTF? I've never heard that phrase to describe "waiting for my child to be born".

by Anonymousreply 544May 3, 2019 8:31 PM

It seems Gayle King is gong to cover cheating allegations in her TV special on Royals - according to some heavy handed hints set out by @TudorChick1501 in her twitter feed All these ageing American women who have such a deep interest in MM - most odd.

by Anonymousreply 545May 3, 2019 8:32 PM

Size during pregnancy can be a product of overeating... I know someone who’s about eight months along (she’s due in June) and she’s just huge... just about as big as MM was the last we saw her. She’ll eat anything that comes into her view. Her reasoning is that she’s dieted all her life, and now she gets to indulge, that might be what’s going on with MM. as an actress she’s had to watch her figure, so she might be overdoing it.

by Anonymousreply 546May 3, 2019 8:33 PM

Worth every penny.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 547May 3, 2019 8:33 PM

R542 - Duchess Meghan isn't correct. Scobie Sucks.

by Anonymousreply 548May 3, 2019 8:34 PM

Anna Wintour would like the two Duchesses Kate and Meghan at the Met Gala. They can leave their husbands at home. Please bitch.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 549May 3, 2019 8:37 PM

Omid Scabies is as reliable as Sparkle. As in, not at all.

by Anonymousreply 550May 3, 2019 8:38 PM

Princess Michael’s daughter Lady Gabriella is getting married on May 18. The Queen will attend. Goody! I can’t wait to see Christine in all her finery.

Can’t you just hear her? “We are going to show them how a royal wedding is done, darling.”

by Anonymousreply 551May 3, 2019 8:40 PM

R477, this is why I love DL.

Celeb gossip, arts news, bitchery, and accurate medical info.

by Anonymousreply 552May 3, 2019 8:41 PM

I wonder why Will and Harry don't go to their father's tailor. Will's suits are terrible and his tuxedos even worse.

by Anonymousreply 553May 3, 2019 8:46 PM

R549, isn't that horribly rude of Anna Wintour to wear her dark sunglasses in the presence of HM?

by Anonymousreply 554May 3, 2019 8:48 PM

Meghan most likely maintained her figure via a Nazi style regime of exercise/diet which would have been unsafe to maintain during pregnancy. Without it, she ballooned and is clearly embarrassed by her size, when she should have embraced the lard like Kim Kardashian did in her first two pregnancies.

by Anonymousreply 555May 3, 2019 8:49 PM

It's weird how the misogynist Skippies and Kate trolls never blame Harry for this treacherous fake pregnancy. He would be complicit too yet is never mentioned.

by Anonymousreply 556May 3, 2019 8:53 PM

Remember when the British Actress "Dames"

were Dame Edith Evans, Dame Peggy Ashcroft, Dame May Whitty, Dame Margaret Rutherford, and Dame Judith Anderson?

Well, now we have:

Dame Joan Collins, Dame Emma Thompson, Dame Julie Andrews, Dame Julie Walters, and Dame Kristin Scott-Thomas!

by Anonymousreply 557May 3, 2019 8:53 PM

R555, well, I cannot speak for Kim K, but Meghan, being in her late 30's would be closely monitored for Gestational Diabetes.

I don't think that she would indulge to that degree.

by Anonymousreply 558May 3, 2019 8:55 PM

Are there still any Skippies left on this thread, or have they all gone back to Tumblr?

TorontoPaper tweeted BaNG on 30 April and lpoks mighty stupid now.

by Anonymousreply 559May 3, 2019 8:58 PM

I am not sure who I detest more these days - Markle or the hysterical dickheads who adore her.

They really do believe that anyone who doesn’t want to coat their tongue in her shit is racist.

I cannot wait till this implodes in a year or two. With any luck they’ll form a commune and start passing round Cool Aid.

by Anonymousreply 560May 3, 2019 9:07 PM

R560 - Myself, I go back and forth on who I dislike the most - Harry, Meghan or Megastans.

by Anonymousreply 561May 3, 2019 9:11 PM

I can’t wait for the stories of her narcissistic rage to surface post-divorce. You KNOW the staff are keeping quiet, biding their time and recording every fucking nasty thing she says/does.

by Anonymousreply 562May 3, 2019 9:12 PM

R557 Emma Thompson, Dame Julie Walters, and Kristin Scott-Thomas are find actresses, and the other in your group, Julie Andrews, has done some very fine work. In fact, in terms of contributions to British stage and cinema, ranging from her work in The Americanization of Emily and Victor/Victoria to rescuing The Sound of Music singlehandedly from diabetic overdose . . . I might put her in front of the others. Walters is a wonderful actress, as well.

Did we get bulletins from mouthpieces for Kate whilst on maternity leave that she was "comfortable and content"???!!!

It is unbelievable what the BRF is taking up the PR anus from this bitch, it really is. This baby is seventh in line and meaningless to the future of Britain. Jesus Christ, why doesn't someone stop her?!

Can't wait for Lady Gabriella Windsor's wedding.

by Anonymousreply 563May 3, 2019 9:13 PM

This thread is filling up fast so here is the next one.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 564May 3, 2019 9:13 PM

The Queen, Prince Philip, Princesss Anne and Prince Charles. Just a normal family sitting out on the lawn of their castle.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 565May 3, 2019 9:16 PM

I agree that the timeline is fucked up because Meghan announced too early. No way was she 12 weeks along when she showed up to Eugenie's wedding in the maternity coat. That was a hasty lie to answer the backlash about her stealing Eugenie's thunder. Perhaps that's the reason for the alleged padding, too? She was trying to keep up the fake timeline, even though she had to realize that at some point (like, oh, now), the jig would be up.

by Anonymousreply 566May 3, 2019 9:16 PM

It's nice to know who your ancestors are. Well, maybe not.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 567May 3, 2019 9:17 PM

R566, I suspect that— IF she thought it through at all— she hoped she’d be one of those older mothers who deliver a little early, this salvaging her timeline.

by Anonymousreply 568May 3, 2019 9:18 PM

I agree with R536 that William is reclaiming his hotness, despite the bald head. If he'd shape up a bit and get some better-fitting suits, AND with the new Alpha Dick demeanor, he might get all the way back to handsome again. With the right attitude, baldness is not a dealbreaker.

by Anonymousreply 569May 3, 2019 9:18 PM

A young Diana writes a letter to her parents.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 570May 3, 2019 9:19 PM

All of this and we weren't even in 2019 at the time of writing.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 571May 3, 2019 9:19 PM

Baldy No# 2. He's not aging well at all.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 572May 3, 2019 9:20 PM

No matter how long they wait to announce, the baby's actual date of birth will be a matter of public record, yes? So if she was lying about being 12 weeks along at Eugenie's wedding, the truth will definitely out eventually.

by Anonymousreply 573May 3, 2019 9:21 PM

Some books for royal historians.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 574May 3, 2019 9:23 PM

Are the bunions the reason her shoes are always too big? Can't she just get wide fit shoes?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 575May 3, 2019 9:24 PM

I concede this is s most mundane mystery, but I just can’t figure out why she was so huge so early, unless she’s having twins.

It’s really weird for a first pregnancy of someone so fit..

And if she's padding, that’s weird too. All the yoga mommies pride themselves on not even looking pregnant, and making the whole thing seem effortless.

Whereas MM has belabored her every burp and fart since she got knocked up. Her pregnancy is the most epic thing anyone has ever done!

It’s so weird and dare I say un-feminist. She clearly thinks pregnancy is the most impressive thing she’s ever done. And for her, maybe it is. But not for most women (you know, the ones who work until the day they go into labor.)

by Anonymousreply 576May 3, 2019 9:25 PM

Does anyone have any recommendations for a good, non-ass kissing bio of the Queen Mum? Available on Kindle if possible.

by Anonymousreply 577May 3, 2019 9:28 PM

^*fine actresses

R563

by Anonymousreply 578May 3, 2019 9:29 PM

R577 - try Hugo Vickers' book.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 579May 3, 2019 9:31 PM

R577 - if you want a little more dishy, try Lady Colin Campbell's book.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 580May 3, 2019 9:33 PM

The Penelope Mortimer bio is definitely not ass-kissing, R577. Not a hatchet job either, and laugh out loud funny in places.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 581May 3, 2019 9:35 PM

R576 - I've never had children but I'll hazard to guess that MOST women think that pregnancy is pretty impressive and awesome because it is when you think about it. However, it's the younger generation who may believe that they're special and God's gift to humanity.

by Anonymousreply 582May 3, 2019 9:37 PM

Thanks very much, R579, R580, and R581.

by Anonymousreply 583May 3, 2019 9:38 PM

She's not the yoga fanatic she makes herself out to be......

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 584May 3, 2019 9:46 PM

R563, thanks for reply. Yes, they are all fine actresses, just not necessarily Shakespearean ones!

(No offense to Joan Collins.) And I cannot imagine any of them using "Dame" in her title in film credits!

by Anonymousreply 585May 3, 2019 9:46 PM

R575, her legs look nice when they are good and tanned!

by Anonymousreply 586May 3, 2019 9:52 PM

This is a very flattering portrait of younger Randy Andy in uniform.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 587May 3, 2019 9:53 PM

Diana's ginger nephew Louis Spencer is MUCH HOTTER than balding Harry. Yum, yum!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 588May 3, 2019 9:56 PM

Louis and his hair wave.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 589May 3, 2019 9:57 PM

Louis Spencer showing a little chest hair with his mother Victoria.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 590May 3, 2019 9:59 PM

R581 - Oh, I thought Mortimer's book threw considerable shade at the Queen Mum. Some of it was shrewd, but some of it was petulant (she sounded almost jealous) and included things that Mortimer "imagined" happening as the basis for nasty comments.

But it was an engaging and entertaining book, which was refreshing simply because it wasn't the usual hagiographic material that surrounded the Queen Mum.

by Anonymousreply 591May 3, 2019 10:00 PM

Shirtless Louis chilling in Ibiza.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 592May 3, 2019 10:00 PM

John, Charles and Louis - the late, present and future Earls Spencer.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 593May 3, 2019 10:02 PM

Louis Spencer's parents Charles and Victoria at the time of their engagement.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 594May 3, 2019 10:05 PM

R576 If you're referring to the Where Is That Damned Baby issue, it's not mysterious at all - the logical deduction is that Meghan announced early and lied about having had that 12-week scan so she could pull off her maternity coat stunt at Eugenie's wedding. Perhaps she had had a scan, insisted on one, asked for one, and it was really 8-9 weeks rather than 12. Or maybe she hadn't had a scan at all and took a chance on announcing after whilst 8-10 weeks rather than waiting the usual 12 weeks to be on the safe side.

After watching her and her PR's handling of this birth of the seventh in line, I would put absolutely nothing past her. In fact, I'd say I underestimated the depth of her deluded narcissism.

I hope the BRF is huddled in regular conferences trying to figure out how to get rid of the Sussexes without having to resort to the black Mercedes (not including the poor kid, of course, who'd be much better off being adopted by, say, Eugenie).

by Anonymousreply 595May 3, 2019 10:05 PM

Louis vs. Harry. See the family resemblance?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 596May 3, 2019 10:06 PM

I've always found this photo of Diana very sad. Little did we know she would be dead shortly after.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 597May 3, 2019 10:08 PM

Next thread is up.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 598May 3, 2019 10:08 PM

Diana dressed in a period Klondike costume while on tour in Canada.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 599May 3, 2019 10:10 PM

Diana's FU black dress.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 600May 3, 2019 10:10 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!