Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

My Treasonal Summer Job Abroad (The Mueller Investigation Part 39)

Continued Discussion

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 603July 27, 2018 2:18 PM

Link to previous thread for reference.Previous thread titles for reference:

First Charges Filed in Mueller Investigation (10/27/17)

First Charges Filed in Mueller Investigation, Part Two (10/28/17)

The Four Treasons: Mueller Investigation, Part 3 (10/31/17)

A Man For All Treasons: Mueller Investigation, Part 4 (11/5/17)

It's Beginning to Look a lot like Treason! The Mueller Investigation Part 5 (12/4/17)

Treason Is The Reason For The Season! The Mueller Investigation Part 6 (12/16/17)

Treason to Believe (The Mueller Investigation Part 7) (12/26/17)

I Love You For Sentimental Treasons (The Mueller Investigation Part 8) (1/3/18)

Give Me One Treason To Stay Here... (The Mueller Investigation Part 9) (1/15/18)

Treasons of Love (The Mueller Investigation Part 10) (1/24/18)

For Treasons Which Are Well Known To Them (The Mueller Investigation Part 11) (1/30/18)

Come on and Treason Down, Treason Down the Road (The Mueller Investigation Part 12) (2/6/18)

13 Treasons Why (The Mueller Investigation Part 13) (2/18/18)

By Treason of Insanity (The Mueller Investigation Part 14) (2/23/18)

The Edge of Treason (The Mueller Investigation Part 15) (2/28/18)

A Treason to Live; A Treason to Die (The Mueller Investigation Part 16)…(3/10/18)

Treasons of the Heart (The Mueller Investigation Part 17) (3/17/18)

A Stormy Treason (The Mueller Investigation Part 18) (3/21/18)

Lovin', Touchin', Treason (The Mueller Investigation Part 19) (3/26/18)

Everything Happens for a Treason (The Mueller Investigation Part 20) (4/4/18)

For All the Right Treasons (The Mueller Investigation Part 21) (4/11/18)

Treasons Change (The Mueller Investigation Part 22) (4/16/18)

Dangerous Tre'asons (The Mueller Investigation Part 23) (4/22/18)

Don't Stop (the) Treason (The Mueller Investigation Part 24) (5/1/18)

Got This Treason in My Body (The Mueller Investigation Part 25) (5/7/18)

I'm Treason on a Jet Plane... (The Mueller Investigation Part 26) (5/14/18)

Treasonnaires' Disease (The Mueller Investigation Part 27) (5/21/18)

You've Lost That Lovin' Treason (The Mueller Investigation Part 28) (6/2/18)

Multiple Treasons Why (The Mueller Investigation Part 29) (6/9/18)

For Undisclosed Treasons (The Mueller Investigation Part 30) (6/18/18)

The Apple Doesn't Fall Far from the Treason (The Mueller Investigation Part 31) (06/23/18)

Treason d'être (The Mueller Investigation Part 32) (06/30/18)

My Treasons Are Not My Own (The Mueller Investigation Part 33) (07/08/18)

The Treasons a Baby Cries (The Mueller Investigation Part 34) (07/13/19)

Get to Know Your Family Treason (The Mueller Investigation Part 35) (07/15/18)

All You Got To Do is Hold Him And Kiss Him and Treason (The Mueller Investigation Part 36) (07/17/18)

Fall or Spring? Which Would / Wouldn't Be Your Favorite Treason? (The Mueller Investigation Part 37) (07/18/18)

It's the Time of the Treason (The Mueller Investigation Part 38) (07/21/18)

My Treasonal Summer Job Abroad (The Mueller Investigation Part 39) (07/25/18)

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1July 25, 2018 4:23 PM

Link to previous thread for reference.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 2July 25, 2018 4:27 PM

My favorite one so far. Bravo OP!

by Anonymousreply 3July 25, 2018 4:38 PM

[quote]Trump Administration Plans Up to $12 Billion in Farm Aid to Ease Concerns Over Trade Disputes

So now he's paying his base.

by Anonymousreply 4July 25, 2018 5:00 PM

The opening graphic Op used is brilliant!

by Anonymousreply 5July 25, 2018 5:15 PM

I am still waiting for a true bomb-shell revelation that will truly take this scum down. Haven't seen one yet. George Will last night on The Last Word said as scummy as these pay-offs are and Trump is they really don't stoop to the level of criminality unless thats what we want campaign laws to come to. He despises Trump but believes this is all much ado about nothing so far... I somewhat agree. People in Iowa and Wisconsin still love Trump. I hear it every day and am personally dumbfounded how he is still as popular as he is.

by Anonymousreply 6July 25, 2018 5:21 PM

^The criminality will be in the indictments as with Flynn, Manafort, etc.

by Anonymousreply 7July 25, 2018 5:39 PM

Well, if George Will says it, it must be true.

by Anonymousreply 8July 25, 2018 5:40 PM

I can think of just five or six confirmed criminal acts by Trump offhand, and I’m not even a lawyer.

Obstruction and perjury come immediately to mind.

by Anonymousreply 9July 25, 2018 5:52 PM

“I am a farmer and a Trump supporter. I agree that China needs to be punished for stealing patented U.S. technology. But opening a new front in this trade war, while trying to reduce the blowback on farmers with a Great Depression-era transfer program, is not the right approach. It is the economic equivalent of treating a hangnail by cutting off your finger.

As Trump’s aid package tacitly admits, tariffs hit farmers especially hard. With farmers already facing economic head winds, including oversupply and drought, I predict that even with this aid, expanded tariffs would be the breaking point that puts some farmers out of business entirely. As the history of the Great Depression demonstrates, such federal and bureaucratic farm-support programs rarely compensate for the full burden of a trade war, while usually ushering in unintended consequences that distort the farm economy.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10July 25, 2018 5:56 PM

R9 don't forget giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

by Anonymousreply 11July 25, 2018 5:58 PM

It's hard to admit when you've been had. I tell this to all the tRUMP supporters I know or meet.

by Anonymousreply 12July 25, 2018 5:59 PM

And they are so damn stubborn. Was it like this with Nixon's silent majority, or did they accept defeat with some dignity?

by Anonymousreply 13July 25, 2018 6:02 PM

I’ve seen the deplorable set go back to Jesus as their main man.

They are distancing themselves.

by Anonymousreply 14July 25, 2018 6:06 PM

[quote]Funny considering [R472] is a homophobe with a history of using gay and racial slurs and saying "Jews got what they deserved."

How about you post a link with a thread where I said that, you lying POS.

You've actually have been banned for lying about other posters.

Do it again and I will report you.

by Anonymousreply 15July 25, 2018 6:51 PM

I think the Deplorables, some of them will desert Trump if they believe it is their own idea and if they feel lie they have come to that conclusion. You have to leave them a way out. If you get all confrontational and you start arguing the facts with them, you force them to dig in and get real stubborn. The irony is that even as he attacks China he is borrowing money from China to give to the farmers to aid them in a crisis he created. All of it unnecessary.

by Anonymousreply 16July 25, 2018 6:52 PM

[quote]You've actually have been banned for lying about other posters.

No, I haven't and considering THAT'S a lie, I'm reporting you.

by Anonymousreply 17July 25, 2018 6:55 PM

Trump's newest idea is having the next summit after the investigation. Sometimes there are very few words needed.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 18July 25, 2018 6:55 PM

[quote]Yes, you are, [R601]. Thanks for proving the point. Oh, and go fuck yourself!

The only thing proved is that you are a fucking asshole.

Fuck you.

by Anonymousreply 19July 25, 2018 6:56 PM

Deplorable cookie clearer at R19!

by Anonymousreply 20July 25, 2018 6:57 PM

[quote] No, I haven't and considering THAT'S a lie, I'm reporting you.

Yes, you have.

If I had said what you claimed, then post a link to the thread where I said "Jews got what they deserved.".

I'm waiting.

Your move.

by Anonymousreply 21July 25, 2018 6:58 PM

Block R19. Just another troll with nothing to contribute trying to derail the thread.

by Anonymousreply 22July 25, 2018 6:58 PM

Oh those tricky.....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 23July 25, 2018 6:58 PM

[quote]Trump's newest idea is having the next summit after the investigation.

And he apparently believes the investigation will be done by the end of this year. Statement from John Bolton:

“The President believes that the next bilateral meeting with President Putin should take place after the Russia witch hunt is over, so we’ve agreed that it will be after the first of the year.”

by Anonymousreply 24July 25, 2018 6:59 PM

Please, do block me, R22.

by Anonymousreply 25July 25, 2018 6:59 PM

No, I haven't, R21 and if that's the case, prove it.

Clear some more cookies!

by Anonymousreply 26July 25, 2018 6:59 PM

Someone is desperate for attention.

by Anonymousreply 27July 25, 2018 7:00 PM

Girls, girls, you're both wrong!

Take it outside, you're destroying threads.

by Anonymousreply 28July 25, 2018 7:01 PM

Kids, stop fucking arguing and focus on the topic of the thread! Otherwise you’ll both go to bed without dinner!

by Anonymousreply 29July 25, 2018 7:01 PM

The burden of proof is on you, R26.

Post a link to the thread where I said "Jews got what they deserved.".

You clearly know what I post, so you can easily prove it, no?

Of course, you wont't, because you are lying.

[quote]Someone is desperate for attention.

I don't appreciate being called an anti-Semite, based on lies. I doubt you would, even if it's anonymous.

by Anonymousreply 30July 25, 2018 7:01 PM

lol. Says the cookie clearer.

You clear your cookies for a reason, no?

by Anonymousreply 31July 25, 2018 7:02 PM

No, I don't clear cookies, R31, and you know that.

You have been banned for doing this exact thing before. You will be banned again.

by Anonymousreply 32July 25, 2018 7:03 PM

everyone, F&F r26 and r30

by Anonymousreply 33July 25, 2018 7:04 PM

Ahem...

I’m guessing the “crimes and misdemeanors“ that are grounds for impeachment can even happen before election, right?

by Anonymousreply 34July 25, 2018 7:04 PM

I'll stop now, R33. But beware of posters like R31. He is prone to accusing posters of homophobia and anti-Semitism. He's done it to me, and he was banned for it.

by Anonymousreply 35July 25, 2018 7:06 PM

Poor Piggy. Everything is turning to piss like his fetish, skin and his gnarly teeth!

by Anonymousreply 36July 25, 2018 7:06 PM

Kushner will be dicked in jail....

by Anonymousreply 37July 25, 2018 7:06 PM

I need to get Twitter. I know Lawrence Tribe the lawyer with the emoluments case tweets. Again, thanks OP for this thread.

by Anonymousreply 38July 25, 2018 7:07 PM

Thank you OP

by Anonymousreply 39July 25, 2018 7:08 PM

[quote]If you get all confrontational and you start arguing the facts with them, you force them to dig in and get real stubborn.

Instead of arguing with facts which they are immune to, ask "innocent" questions about every inane statement they make as if you don't understand.

by Anonymousreply 40July 25, 2018 7:11 PM

R35 is a troll who has contributed nothing to these threads except posts trying to disrupt the thread and falsely accusing OP of being a misogynist. It has tried this in multiple threads. Ironic isn't it considering what hes screeching about today.

by Anonymousreply 41July 25, 2018 7:12 PM

Rick Wilson:

...Excellent point. Once you give the soybean and hog guys $12 billion, then timber guys want a bailout, then the auto parts guys, then the...

by Anonymousreply 42July 25, 2018 7:13 PM

[quote]As Trump’s aid package tacitly admits, tariffs hit farmers especially hard. With farmers already facing economic head winds, including oversupply and drought, I predict that even with this aid, expanded tariffs would be the breaking point that puts some farmers out of business entirely. As the history of the Great Depression demonstrates, such federal and bureaucratic farm-support programs rarely compensate for the full burden of a trade war

Thanks, r10. A couple more things to add to that: First, this is being talked about as a one-off under a Presidential prerogative hardly ever used, and usually only for natural disasters.

So in other words, a bogus election-year payoff to compensate for an economic "own goal" mistake by the dumb ass that was starting to cause farmers to bitch. Farmers he believes are "his people."

Secondly, as his much-needed Senate frenemy Murkowski asks, Why just farmers? What about the fisheries industry in my state being hurt by your trade war? What about auto companies in the US being hit hard by the steel wars?

by Anonymousreply 43July 25, 2018 7:17 PM

Too bad none of the workers will see a cent of those 12 billion.

by Anonymousreply 44July 25, 2018 7:19 PM

John Aravosis:

So just to clarify the Republican position: You shouldn’t have to subsidize my health care to keep me alive because I’m sick through no fault of my own, but I should subsidize your failing business that’s in trouble because you vote for the wrong guy. Got it.

by Anonymousreply 45July 25, 2018 7:19 PM

I would like more Avenatti photos a d less Rump ones!

by Anonymousreply 46July 25, 2018 7:22 PM

I was just hearing how the farmers dont even want the bailout.

by Anonymousreply 47July 25, 2018 7:23 PM

[quote] History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.

-Churchill. (Also Caesar, essentially)

No matter with Trump however! Lol, not with a sharpie! I’m sorry, no mystery here. He’ll be crucified. Just give it five years. He doesn’t actually read or write.

by Anonymousreply 48July 25, 2018 7:28 PM

Of course they don't, r47. Not if they're honest.

U.S. Soybean farmers, for example, were on a roll and expanding operations, thanks to huge demand from China. Until their hero started the tariff shit, and then oops, China retaliates and now buyers there look to get soy from elsewhere.

by Anonymousreply 49July 25, 2018 7:29 PM

OP might not be a misogynist but he’s definitely a bitch which is why I blocked him.

This hearing with Pompeo right now should be interesting. Maybe we’ll find out if that soccer ball had the kind of chip which takes videos of world leaders getting it on with underage hookers.

by Anonymousreply 50July 25, 2018 7:31 PM

This 12 billion subsidy to soybean farmers is really sticking in my craw. These are same assholes who decry all welfare recipients as lazy no goods, but you can be damn sure farmers will be lining up to get their "gubmint check."

White = welfare good. Black/Brown = welfare bad.

by Anonymousreply 51July 25, 2018 7:35 PM

Oh so it's ok to make false claims huh R50. Sounds more like you're the bitch.

by Anonymousreply 52July 25, 2018 7:35 PM

I want to punch Pompeo in the face. Little cunt has no intentions to answer any tough questions today and sounds like a broken propaganda tape.

by Anonymousreply 53July 25, 2018 7:36 PM

Menendez did a nice job of shaming Pompeo. I'm hoping the rest of the dems can keep it up.

by Anonymousreply 54July 25, 2018 7:38 PM

I am not a troll, R41. I have pointed at OP's misogyny, because it happens to be true (I can post a link where that is patently clear). But that is irrelevant to these threads and I will not post about it again.

However I have never done anything as vile as your post below (from the previous thread). It is absolutely despicable to accuse people in such manner, to actually manufacture a quote... unreal.

There is arguing and bitching, and there is blatant lying of your kind:

[quote]Funny considering R472 is a homophobe with a history of using gay and racial slurs and saying "Jews got what they deserved."

I don't clear my cookies. My post history is there for everyone to see. If I did cleared my cookies, how would you know what I have posted in the past, anyway.

by Anonymousreply 55July 25, 2018 7:41 PM

just imagine how many paper towels $12B would buy for Puerto Rico, with maybe some left over for generators

by Anonymousreply 56July 25, 2018 7:42 PM

R55 you sound insane. Stop making false accusations. I've checked OPs history nothing misogynistic at all. Stop making shit up.

by Anonymousreply 57July 25, 2018 7:45 PM

Go Cardin! Pompeo is a terrible liar!

by Anonymousreply 58July 25, 2018 7:45 PM

Good point, r56.

Of course, farmers are real Americans weren't meant to be hurt (probably including the multinational farm corporations that will beg to get those billions).

Puerto Rico is only sort of American, and plus no voters. I did a great job. They are ingrates.

That's how this idiot thinks.

by Anonymousreply 59July 25, 2018 7:46 PM

Wasn't the Lying Treason-in-Chief just saying that he's closing a bilateral deal with Mexico on NAFTA like, any moment now?

Apparently, Mexico and Canada beg to differ with "the best dealmaker".

[quote]The two Mexican government ministers responsible for NAFTA negotiations say they still regard Donald Trump’s insistence on a five-year termination clause in the accord as a deal breaker and emphasize they are only interested in a three-way deal involving Canada, the United States and Mexico. The unequivocal statements from Economy Minister Ildefonso Guajardo and Foreign Affairs Minister Luis Videgaray followed a meeting with Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland in Mexico City on Wednesday.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 60July 25, 2018 7:52 PM

R41, falsely accusing a poster of homophobia and racism is not cool.

by Anonymousreply 61July 25, 2018 8:05 PM

Dudette, you promised ten threads back that you wouldn’t bring up the misogyny accusations again, and yet here you are. Honestly, I am the original (female and feminist, as it happens) OP and I think you should let it go, just as I said ten threads back. This OP is doing great work keeping the threads alive, timely and funny, and it IS important work. I’m just thankful he’s a patriot. You should be too.

Do you think it is better to derail an anti-Trump thread due to whatever purity test you have in your head? Really? That’s the greater good when our country has been invaded by Putin? Fucking really?

Let it go.

by Anonymousreply 62July 25, 2018 8:08 PM

Perhaps a separate thread could be started for the cat-fight ....

by Anonymousreply 63July 25, 2018 8:08 PM

Girl Fight!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 64July 25, 2018 8:13 PM

Tяump's Hollywood Walk of Fame star was smashed to pieces

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 65July 25, 2018 8:17 PM

Orange Turd speaking in the Rose Garden right now. All the roses died the moment he opened his mouth.

by Anonymousreply 66July 25, 2018 8:21 PM

Pompeo is a pompous ass.

by Anonymousreply 67July 25, 2018 8:25 PM

O my god when he ad-libs. So embarrassing.

Reciprocal. My favorite word, reciprocal. And so it's going to be so great, that I can tell you. And all of this will be so good, really, great, so much better than we've ever seen before. And thank you, for applauding me just then, you two people who clapped. Thank you.

by Anonymousreply 68July 25, 2018 8:27 PM

Well r66, that saves Tina the trouble in getting the ax!

by Anonymousreply 69July 25, 2018 8:29 PM

R68, yes! He just learned the word “reciprocal”, which is why it’s his favorite word. And Sarah Sanders was clapping with her hands, feet and butt cheeks. So damn embarrassing.

by Anonymousreply 70July 25, 2018 8:31 PM

Mexico and Canada both know how weak he is and the fact that he is a shit negotiator.

by Anonymousreply 71July 25, 2018 8:32 PM

She clapped her ass cheeks?

Was that the great thunderclap to usher in the apocalypse?

by Anonymousreply 72July 25, 2018 8:33 PM

Frank Figluzzi, former FBI guy currently on MSNBC, just coined the perfect term for the Orange Turd's negotiation results with anyone:

[quote] I'm fixing to get ready to do something.

Thank you, Frank.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 73July 25, 2018 8:38 PM

Of *course* people in Iowa and Wisconsin still love Trump; they voted him for the racism.

by Anonymousreply 74July 25, 2018 8:43 PM

They didn’t vote for him; the vote machines and the tallies were hacked in Wisconsin. (And Michigan, Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio.)

by Anonymousreply 75July 25, 2018 8:55 PM

Emails suggest Republicans gerrymandered Michigan to weaken ‘Dem garbage’

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 76July 25, 2018 8:57 PM

Miss Linds had another interview today. This time on Fox radio. Why is one Senator doing spin daily for Trump. Linds will expressed modest concerns about tariffs as if she is subduing her criticism of Trump on an issue; then goes into a hissy fit over FISA warrants and DOJ/FBI "Democrats".

by Anonymousreply 77July 25, 2018 9:14 PM

I have more respect for a used semen soaked tissue than I do for Miss Lindsay. What a tool.

by Anonymousreply 78July 25, 2018 9:17 PM

Sorry, R55 you're full of it. What you've stated is the equivalent of, "I could send you facts to prove I'm right... but I'm not gonna!!!!" Because you can't. And don't say stuff like you're not going to provide proof of your claim because it's irrelevant to the thread because you've been spreading the same shit over and over and making shit up throughout all of these threads trying to distract.

We can see OPs history ourselves and there's been nothing of the sort. We can see your history as well and it's full of bizarre claims accusing people of a bunch of weird stuff. There's no way you can tell if ANYONE has been "banned" for anything.

Just stop.

by Anonymousreply 79July 25, 2018 9:24 PM

R62 thank you for putting that better than I could! And thanks for the original threads!

by Anonymousreply 80July 25, 2018 9:25 PM

Am I missing his reaction to the Cohen tape release or has it been crickets?

by Anonymousreply 81July 25, 2018 9:29 PM

Why was Lindsay tasked with the job of attacking the FISA warrants? Is he worried there's one on him?

by Anonymousreply 82July 25, 2018 9:31 PM

And thanks again OP for another thread! I love the photo. it's perfect.

by Anonymousreply 83July 25, 2018 9:33 PM

He's such a fucking moron I literally cannot tell if the quote at R68 is satire or a verbatim Dump quote.

by Anonymousreply 84July 25, 2018 9:34 PM

R79, I think the poster was trying to say that the accusations of racism and homophobia against him are false.

OP hasn't said a word, so it's best to move on.

Both bickering posters seem to be gone/banned, anyway.

by Anonymousreply 85July 25, 2018 9:37 PM

Everyone actually knows the FISA Warrent is airtight. So Lindsay is looking like a fool, questioning it. Why no FISA Warrent against Jared? He travels the world selling protection, isn't there a law?

by Anonymousreply 86July 25, 2018 9:43 PM

R85 neither is repeatedly falsely claiming that someone is a misogynist and continuing to post it thread after thread.

by Anonymousreply 87July 25, 2018 9:45 PM

R87, would anyone even care if OP is a misogynist? Casual misogyny is common on DL, my guess is no one would.

by Anonymousreply 88July 25, 2018 9:53 PM

So is "casual racism and homophobia," R88 so not a good argument.

by Anonymousreply 89July 25, 2018 9:55 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 90July 25, 2018 10:00 PM

That's true, r89.

But there is a difference between being labeled a homophobe/racist/anti-Semite than a misogynist. People get red tagged for former and not the latter. For a good reason.

by Anonymousreply 91July 25, 2018 10:02 PM

That's great news, R90.

by Anonymousreply 92July 25, 2018 10:05 PM

I disagree, R91. You don't get to scream that someone is falsely accusing you of anything when you've been doing the same to other people. Especially repeatedly and especially when that's your only activity in any of the threads.

by Anonymousreply 93July 25, 2018 10:06 PM

Miss Lindz needs to go away. They need to stop having her on TV lying.

by Anonymousreply 94July 25, 2018 10:07 PM

Thread officially hijacked.

by Anonymousreply 95July 25, 2018 10:07 PM

Pompeo is a traitor! wrap him in chains and roll him like a giant blueberry into the nearest dejuicer!

by Anonymousreply 96July 25, 2018 10:07 PM

If the Senatrice goes away how will she ever get those Russian hunks to notice her?

by Anonymousreply 97July 25, 2018 10:08 PM

In principle, I guess, yes, R93.

I would not want false accusations hurled at me, but if I had to choose, I know it would not be the one that comes with a red tag.

by Anonymousreply 98July 25, 2018 10:09 PM

No r95, it isn't. Now moving on......

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 99July 25, 2018 10:10 PM

People are living the Trump boat left and right.

by Anonymousreply 100July 25, 2018 10:11 PM

Does anyone have the numbers as to how many people have left their posts under Drumpf?

by Anonymousreply 101July 25, 2018 10:12 PM

I can think of several crimes that both Trump and Jared have committed yet nothing is done. Pardon me but it all just makes me sick to see how Republicans are all just disgusting lowlifes who have no character, no morals and who keep trying to put lipstick on this pig.

by Anonymousreply 102July 25, 2018 10:12 PM

I'm done R95. No more from me on the subject of who lied about what.

by Anonymousreply 103July 25, 2018 10:12 PM

Yes r96, he is indeed......

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 104July 25, 2018 10:13 PM

Yeah, R98, but again, the point is that the screecher is screeching about being falsely accused when he himself is constantly falsely accusing. It's ridiculous and it's trolling.

by Anonymousreply 105July 25, 2018 10:13 PM

The soccer ball really WAS wired.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 106July 25, 2018 10:14 PM

R106 and you know if there was a way to hack that chip they would have done it... but they probably don't need to wire him since he just tells them whatever they want to know anyway.

by Anonymousreply 107July 25, 2018 10:15 PM

Dad gave me a soccer ball one of his Russian friends gave him.

It's a funny-looking ball with wires and chips in it.

Plus, it keeps on making weird noises.

Dad says it's ok since that ball is from Russia.

Tbf, I don't think so. But I can't ask anyone here for help. And when I asked Mum she just said something along the lines of 'I really don't care, do you' with her barely comprehensible accent.

Can you help me, please? :-(

by Anonymousreply 108July 25, 2018 10:26 PM

r108 Sweetheart call 911 and say your dad is a collaborator

by Anonymousreply 109July 25, 2018 10:30 PM

I saw daddy sucking off that weird russian man in the corner of the room while my new mommy cried and my slut sister looked up blow job tips on her ipad

by Anonymousreply 110July 25, 2018 10:31 PM

Anyone remember the mini-series 'V'? It is going on here today except not with Aliens but Russians and their enablers. It shows how easily people are manipulated with propaganda and turn against their self interest. Lots of fascism to boot.

And of course, it had the Resistance led by a woman!

by Anonymousreply 111July 25, 2018 10:38 PM

There's a thread on this....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 112July 25, 2018 10:39 PM

Sad news. The President of the United States won't be visiting us in person this fall.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 113July 25, 2018 10:41 PM

R111 that would explain McConnell's face. His mask is too loose and barely covers his reptilian form.

by Anonymousreply 114July 25, 2018 10:46 PM

R108 I believe a Mr. Robert Mueller would like to see that ball - maybe you could take it to him? He might also have some questions about your dad but don't worry about that. Chin up kid!

by Anonymousreply 115July 25, 2018 10:48 PM

Rub the soccer ball all over Kellyanne's pussy. If it crackles and burst, it is confirmation it was wired.

by Anonymousreply 116July 25, 2018 11:04 PM

What is a pussy?

Dad says he likes to grab girls by them, but I'm totally clueless as to what it is.

I once asked Mum but she was just like 'I really don't care, do you' again.

:-S

by Anonymousreply 117July 25, 2018 11:11 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 118July 25, 2018 11:14 PM

R118 Wouldn't be surprised as the police are filled with Nazi's and white nationalists.

by Anonymousreply 119July 25, 2018 11:17 PM

Trump’s Former Lawyer Michael Cohen Recorded Conversation About Stormy Daniels Payment With News Anchor

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 120July 25, 2018 11:17 PM

Those Freedom Caucus fuckers have moved to impeach Rosenstein. I don't know if it will lead anywhere or not.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 121July 25, 2018 11:19 PM

we have this, fat, old white male deplorable at work who keeps screaming the WSJ is fake news.

I laughed in his face. "you've obviously never read it" is what I said.

by Anonymousreply 122July 25, 2018 11:21 PM

[quote]. I don't know if it will lead anywhere or not.

They need 2/3ds of congress in order to impeach. Never going to happen.

by Anonymousreply 123July 25, 2018 11:22 PM

R121 Shit. We knew it was coming. These cunts were never gonna go quietly.

by Anonymousreply 124July 25, 2018 11:22 PM

r123 Does Ryan have to let them formally bring this up? If he does will they hold hearings even if they can't get the votes?

by Anonymousreply 125July 25, 2018 11:25 PM

I wonder how many other women he paid to sleep with him. Did Melania get money to sleep with him too? Was Barron a wanted or unwanted pregnancy?

by Anonymousreply 126July 25, 2018 11:30 PM

Don Jr has forceps marks all over his dumb face---result of a botched abortion? hmmmm

by Anonymousreply 127July 25, 2018 11:30 PM

Imagine Jared Kushner delicate flower being ripped apart by thick meat

by Anonymousreply 128July 25, 2018 11:31 PM

Meow

by Anonymousreply 129July 25, 2018 11:31 PM

Jared has had no one to sleep with ever since his brother has gotten engaged

by Anonymousreply 130July 25, 2018 11:32 PM

I do, R128, I do. Every night.

by Anonymousreply 131July 25, 2018 11:36 PM

R122, next time , add with an innocent smile "Why so mad that WSJ is way above your IQ level?"

by Anonymousreply 132July 25, 2018 11:45 PM

[quote] Puerto Rico is only sort of American

I was watching West Side Story last night and the Puerto Rican’s kept calling the Jets & other white people “Americans.” Then they sang that song — “I like to be in America.” Knowing deplorables aren’t all that well ejumacated, I can see how they would be confused after watching West Side Story, thinking Puerto Rican’s aren’t Americans.

by Anonymousreply 133July 25, 2018 11:45 PM

r122 Ask fatty to chew his food instead of swallowing it like a snake. He won't eat so much and may even slim down a little!

by Anonymousreply 134July 25, 2018 11:46 PM

What's shit for brains done for Puerto Rico. He says he loves America so much but nothing has been done about the people and the buildings.

by Anonymousreply 135July 25, 2018 11:46 PM

WSJ is fake news, it’s owned by Rupert Murdoch

by Anonymousreply 136July 25, 2018 11:47 PM

Well, I guess we can add Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan to the list of people whose lives we will completely fuck over once we're done with Trump.

by Anonymousreply 137July 25, 2018 11:59 PM

And now....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 138July 25, 2018 11:59 PM

I apologize for Puerto Rican’s. I caught it the first time and changed it to Puerto Ricans and it switched back again. Just did i it now, too. I shall alert my spellcheck to never make this mistake again

by Anonymousreply 139July 25, 2018 11:59 PM

Why is it so difficult finding these women he paid off? Bannon knows there are more. Avenatti knows there are more.

by Anonymousreply 140July 26, 2018 12:02 AM

Meadows, Jordan, Biggs, Gaetz, DeSantis, Gohmert, Nunes, Issa, and several more, are the House ringleaders trying to undermine the DOJ & FBI in behalf of Trump. They know they are being less than honest, but anything goes with them in protecting Trump. Name them, expose them, confront them with calls, Emails, Tweets, letters to editors, etc. They need blow-back.

by Anonymousreply 141July 26, 2018 12:08 AM

lol r132. I will do that the next time he says anything.

by Anonymousreply 142July 26, 2018 12:11 AM

Why don’t the press defend reporters like Kaitlin and refuse to attend Sarah Huckabeast’s phony press conferences anymore. That would really say something. I am elder now but reported during Watergate, etc. No one would have put up with this back then. The press really needs to grow some balls and do the right thing and stop pandering to these ass...es. Same with Pompeo. Really ? Give me a break!

by Anonymousreply 143July 26, 2018 12:36 AM

Why can’t anybody hack Nunes texts and emails for the past 5 years? That would be....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 144July 26, 2018 1:02 AM

[quote] Why don’t the press defend reporters like Kaitlin and refuse to attend Sarah Huckabeast’s phony press conferences anymore

Because they are afraid it would end press conferences altogether if they stayed away. Also, let’s face it, these whores want access. Like Maggie Haberman. She’s on CNN, MSNBC, Meet the Press. She gets front page articles in NYT. That’s what the whole WH press corps wants. Access and fame and they also MARRY these people. Half of CNN’s reporters during Bush II were married to people in his administration. Andrea Mitchell is married to Greenspan. Campbell Brown married Dan Senor, an investment banker at the Carlyle Group and provisional leader of the coalition in Iraq, “the face of the Bush Administration in Iraq.” Chris Cuomo is the son of former NY guv Mario Cuomo and brother of current NY guv Andrew Cuomo.

Bet there was nothing like that going on during watergate.

by Anonymousreply 145July 26, 2018 1:15 AM

It's that whole power as an aphrodisiac thing. Everyone's just more upfront about it.

by Anonymousreply 146July 26, 2018 1:22 AM

Why have press conferences when it is all BS anyway? It is a joke now. We don't need them because SSA never answers anything. What's the point?

by Anonymousreply 147July 26, 2018 1:26 AM

How the fuck can Ryan allow this after repeatedly supporting the Mueller investigation? There is no justification for attempting to "impeach" Rosenstein. None.

by Anonymousreply 148July 26, 2018 1:27 AM

Ryan has no more control over the loons in his party than John Boehner did. And frankly, he probably likes that they’re out there kicking up shit. It allows him to act saintly and moral and he can just lie back, Shake his head sadly and let them do the dirty work.

by Anonymousreply 149July 26, 2018 1:31 AM

CNN.com:

"It's a Band-Aid on a broken leg," said Michael Petefish, a 33-year-old Trump supporter and fifth generation soybean farmer in southern Minnesota. "And to be blunt, it seems pretty political and seems like they want to shore up some midterm support."

He added: "Pretend someone smashed your car, and then someone said, 'Don't worry, I will give you a ride to the next place you have to go.' Well, thank you, I appreciate the ride, but what am I going to do the next 10 rides I need after that?"

Joel Schreurs, a soybean farmer from Tyler, Minnesota, said the plan was a "good start" but not a fix that works in the long run.

"I firmly believe we need to either create more markets or be able to work it out with China because we are going to produce way too many soybeans for the markets that we have," he said. "It's a short-term fix."

Schreurs said the economics of the issue make it difficult to solve. He grows about 25,000 bushels of soybeans a year, so if the price goes down $2, that costs him around $50,000.

"Not many people would like it if they took $50,000 away from their business when it is something that they didn't have anything to do with," Schreurs said.

by Anonymousreply 150July 26, 2018 1:48 AM

It will be a real test to see if feeble minded support Trump come November. They have to know on some level that Trump is weak and has to walk back his bad decisions.

Market has hit that tiping point feared - once a giant tech like Facebook drops it all drops.

Rudy using the word ethics was rich since he has none and is a traitor. Another weakling around Trump.

by Anonymousreply 151July 26, 2018 1:57 AM

Paul Ryan is a traitor to Americans

by Anonymousreply 152July 26, 2018 2:06 AM

It would be so much better if Trump turned hie Tariff Wars into a Win/Win and sent Fentanyl to those farmers losing the most money from his policies.

See how simple that was.

by Anonymousreply 153July 26, 2018 2:13 AM

Amen! R152. You know, Trump is really an idiot. No one expected much from him. He was a public figure, a celebrity, and his marital woes and his exploits with women were well known. He was a tabloid figure, owning a beauty pageant, and a modeling agency, etc. he was always seen as sleazy. So if, during the campaign, he had been accused of paying off a playboy bunny or a porn star, who would have been shocked? I'm talking about the people who supported him. That Access Hollywood tape did him a minimum amount of damage if any, and I think he was stupid to have attempted to buy his way out an quash it. He's always been a whore.

They're saying the reason Cohen released this tape is because Rudy was out here painting a picture of him, and lying and smearing him, and he wanted to set the record straight. All of them are assholes. Cohen, Giuliani, Trump. But I'm delighted they a re fighting one another. Jill is on. Her brooch tonight looks kind of porny.

by Anonymousreply 154July 26, 2018 2:14 AM

HAHA!! Melania watches CNN instead of Fox! This pissed off Trump on Air Force One and now they will watch their favorite news shows in separate hotel rooms when they travel. I guess Melania wants to watch real news and fuck with Trump :)

Also, Trump had no comment on the Cohen tape when asked about it multiple times today.

by Anonymousreply 155July 26, 2018 2:15 AM

This tariff BS may help some red state Dems. These people will never admit they were wrong or were snookered by Pres Bone Spurs but they might throw a few votes to Dems in midterms.

by Anonymousreply 156July 26, 2018 2:20 AM

Ford cuts 2018 profit forecast; tariffs, China sales hurt second quarter

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 157July 26, 2018 2:24 AM

Republicans rip Trump 'welfare' plan after tariffs

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 158July 26, 2018 2:26 AM

R157 But the deplorables will still support their guy!

by Anonymousreply 159July 26, 2018 2:27 AM

If Trump wrecks the fucking economy, everything Obama did to get us on our feet again will be erased. The auto industry will be affected, our food supplies, energy, gasoline prices are already going up and that will affect the price of food, and travel. We are staring at a shit mess that will have an impact on American working people and with healthcare and prescriptions costing more, and interest rates going up, the picture looks real bad. We have to get these people out of office. Republican policies are too extreme, and Trump is a fucking idiot. I don't care how we do it, if it's because he bribed a porn star or he gave Putin a blow job andthe Russians have video, he needs to go NOW.

by Anonymousreply 160July 26, 2018 2:36 AM

If it’s any comfort at all after Brexit the UK will be in even worse shape than the US will be.

by Anonymousreply 161July 26, 2018 2:42 AM

Kissinger is some kind of goddamn demon with eternal life and people of both parties need to start ignoring him.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 162July 26, 2018 2:44 AM

This dumb fuck could have rode on the coattails of Obama's economy for awhile but no, he is that insane!

by Anonymousreply 163July 26, 2018 3:03 AM

R163: His mission to destroy EVERYTHING Obama did (including the good economy) will be part of his downfall...

by Anonymousreply 164July 26, 2018 3:30 AM

My wish is that Cohen had tapes of Hannity conversations....... nasty, n word filled, hateful tapes. Tapes outlining financial crimes.

by Anonymousreply 165July 26, 2018 3:43 AM

I wish the Trump tower and Helsinki tapes were leaked!

by Anonymousreply 166July 26, 2018 3:49 AM

There's no way Cohen doesn't have tapes on Hannity. He apparently recorded all of his conversations. But I'm not sure anything would be bad enough to make Hannity fans turn on him. But yes, something that can land him some time would be great.

by Anonymousreply 167July 26, 2018 4:13 AM

Someone needs to piss on him

by Anonymousreply 168July 26, 2018 4:28 AM

[quote]Puerto Rican’s

[quote]Puerto Rican’s

[quote]ejumacated

Basing an accusation against a menacing sociopolitical group in society on a 1950’s Broadway Musical.

by Anonymousreply 169July 26, 2018 4:56 AM

Ivanka's stupid clothing line has tanked it seems. Looks like Kelly Conway and horse-face coulter can even save it!

by Anonymousreply 170July 26, 2018 5:26 AM

So prosecutors have [bold]more than 100 recordings[/bold]. Jesus Christ! He even recorded Chris Cuomo lol

Michael Cohen is the gift that keeps on giving.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 171July 26, 2018 5:35 AM

[quote]Well, I guess we can add Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan to the list of people whose lives we will completely fuck over once we're done with Trump.

Need this

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 172July 26, 2018 5:48 AM

1. Trump looked exceedingly weak compared to Putin at the Helsinki news conference. In every word, deed and action both then, and since, Putin’s totally dominated Trump.

2. During their two hour confab, it appears one of them suggested Trump invite Putin to a State Visit in the US. Trump was so eager to please, he rushed to extend the invitation without any advance work, and without even discussing it, with his own National Security Team: his obsequiousness and incompetence embarrassingly on display to the entire world.

3. Putin further demonstrated his dominance by hedging as to whether he’d accept an invitation from his fawning supplicant, the so-called Leader of the Free World. Smack.

Rather than read Putin to filth, Trump “postponed” his summit like a teenage girl (“I broke up with you first”), and tried to blame it on Mueller.

Three times in eleven days Putin’s demonstrated to anyone with eyes that he owns Trump’s ass outright.

More Kudos to OP for the picture.

by Anonymousreply 173July 26, 2018 6:48 AM

I hope Putin pissed on Trump to mark his territory.

by Anonymousreply 174July 26, 2018 6:50 AM

You say that as a joke, r174, but if this "special relationship" between Putin and Trump continues a few years more (God forbid), I could see Vladdy being sick enough to insist upon such a thing. And Trump, like all self-proclaimed alpha males, will instinctively roll over and bare his ass to the more dominant alpha.

by Anonymousreply 175July 26, 2018 11:27 AM

Some of you bitches are overposting like fuck. These threads are 85% people posting nothing at all. Just kvetching. Tiresome to scroll through and maxes the threads out too soon.

by Anonymousreply 176July 26, 2018 11:34 AM

Makes you wonder when Trumps MO is total dominance?? Yet he is being dominated. Why?

by Anonymousreply 177July 26, 2018 11:39 AM

Hate to agree but r176 is correct. A lot of immature, sometimes downright childish, posts in these threads... and not from bots or deplorables, but from well intentioned liberals and progressives who haven’t done their homework or just post fantasies.

by Anonymousreply 178July 26, 2018 11:46 AM

These threads began losing credibility the moment it became a contest to come up with the most cutesy-poo name for the subsequent thread (when the current thread was nearing 600 posts).

Much like the Trump administration itself, these threads are now more about form than function, beauty over brains, and fashion over utility.

by Anonymousreply 179July 26, 2018 11:54 AM

Yes, there's too much filler in these threads in the form of jejeune badinage, but they're still excellent round-ups of the latest news and commentary, with a lot of perceptive angles.

To add a little substance: something recent on the emoluments case (mmm, I just love saying "emoluments").

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 180July 26, 2018 12:00 PM

Serious question: If the Democrats take the House but not the Senate, can there still be ethics investigations into, oh, well, let's see...EVERYTHING? It kills me that there are so many blatant ethics violations by Trump, his family and the people in his administration that seem to go unchecked. Does it take both chambers to correct this situation?

by Anonymousreply 181July 26, 2018 12:11 PM

I love you R108!

by Anonymousreply 182July 26, 2018 12:14 PM

Yes, R181, the House committees can undertake investigations. In their oversight capacity, the House and Senate work independently of each other for the most part. On occasion they may have joint committees to look into specific topics, but that is not the norm. So, yes, when the Dems retake the House they will begin to have hearings into this nightmare. And there are likely plenty of shady dealings to be uncovered in the departments and agencies.

by Anonymousreply 183July 26, 2018 12:19 PM

I said it earlier and I'll say it again, I believe Putin came into that meeting pissed off and let Trump know he was real pissed off. Now it might have been theater, or it may have been real, (I think a little of both) but Putin had to show some anger at 12 of his GRU people being indicted by Mueller whose indictment was very specific. I'm also thinking he put some pressure on Trump about finding out where the spies are and who they are.They were together for more than 2 hours so it had to come up.

One of the things that has concerned me ever since I realized what a dolt Trump is, was his inability to withhold top secret information from our enemies. I'd bet Putin wants to know who is spying on him. That whole thing about stripping our former top people of security clearances came out of this meeting, I betcha. Trump in particular probably thought Brennan and Rice, and Clapper were reading top secret, raw information about Mueller's investigation then leaking it to the press and talking about it on TV.

Not true. They don't even have clearances anymore. What they do have is knowledge based on their own experience with Russia and other threats to our country and with methodologies. They know the protocol and they analyze Trump's behavior, etc.

As for Trump ruining our economy and weakening it, I feel like we're on this really busy highway, and cars a re speeding by, and we see a drunk driver, careening all over the road, and we know he is going to get into an accident and get someone killed and the cops are sitting on the side of the road just watching him, clocking him on radar and doing nothing to stop the driver.

by Anonymousreply 184July 26, 2018 12:25 PM

Just a note on clearances—people would not be allowed access to any classified material just because they have the clearance. You’re also required to have a “need to Know”—that is, you need access to the material to do your job. People keep clearances because they move in and out of government jobs, and it’s costly and time-consuming to get clearances each time. None of the private citizens being threatened with pulling their clearance actually reviews classified material anymore. This is just your classic drumpf temper tantrum.

by Anonymousreply 185July 26, 2018 12:31 PM

R184 I especially love your analogy on the drunk driver. You are spot on. Drumpf s ineptness has so far been a good thing, but it won’t last forever.

by Anonymousreply 186July 26, 2018 12:33 PM

Michael Avenatti:

Breaking: Donald Trump conspired with Michael Cohen to pay off multiple other women prior to Election Day in 2016. They were also concerned about a pregnancy. Cohen has evidence and info in his possession and it must be released to the public. Now! #Basta

by Anonymousreply 187July 26, 2018 12:36 PM

R187, I really would like to see the GOP explain away a few abortions.

by Anonymousreply 188July 26, 2018 12:56 PM

[quote]see the GOP explain away a few abortions.

God's little appetizers.

by Anonymousreply 189July 26, 2018 1:08 PM

r188 They will say: Yes, President Trump encouraged some women to have abortions, but that was before he found the Lord and repented. He feels so terribly about what he did he has a little shrine to those unborn souls and he kneels and prays and cries in front of it every morning. He's a testament to what the Lord can do in changing someone's life. He's actually a hero of Biblical proportions, and were he Catholic he would be sainted after death. In fact, he's so saintly the Catholic church might even make an exception and saint a protestant.

by Anonymousreply 190July 26, 2018 1:09 PM

WaPo reports that Trump is supposedly only heard on "several" of the 100 tapes, and in "small doses."

Sure.

by Anonymousreply 191July 26, 2018 1:17 PM

So Cheeto is now bff with the EU all of a sudden aka when US auto makers started posting their quarterly results and soybean farmers started kvetching?

Love this quote from Juncker, "We can also do stupid." LOL!

[quote]The tone was friendlier than it has been. During a recent European trip, Trump referred to the EU as a “foe, what they do to us in trade.” Juncker, after Trump imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, said in March that “this is basically a stupid process, the fact that we have to do this. But we have to do it. We can also do stupid.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 192July 26, 2018 1:20 PM

R190 is correct. And then, Pence and Mother will fire up the pro-birth evangelical loonies to take it to SCOTUS ('in order to stop killing babies' they'll say)...

...and then Dump will be celebrated by them for 'making life great again' or some similar regressive drivel.

by Anonymousreply 193July 26, 2018 1:20 PM

Wow r190, you wrote that so well, so authentic, are you sure you're not a hypocritical. evangelical. Republican yourself?

by Anonymousreply 194July 26, 2018 1:31 PM

So I keep hearing Rethugs and Deplorables like the crotch fruit of John McCain defend a Drumpf Presidency by saying they don't care about anything he does because getting a Justice on the Supreme Court is more important..

But they could still get rid of Drumpf and get Pence and still get that Justice, no? Seems like they kind of know that if Drumpf goes, so does Pence.

by Anonymousreply 195July 26, 2018 1:32 PM

R190 you forgot, "You have to look into his heart... even though he encouraged abortions he didn't mean or WANT it."

by Anonymousreply 196July 26, 2018 1:33 PM

I don't think the sex stuff will affect anything in terms of his supporters. There's no shock value for him. He's not John Edwards. Everyone knew he was a pig before he became President. But if there are laws he has broken he needs to be prosecuted. As far as the "you can't indict a sitting POTUS" thing goes, that's bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 197July 26, 2018 1:34 PM

I have to laugh at the people complaining about these threads because it sounds utterly ridiculous and some of it is obvious trolling.

"This thread has lost all credibility."

Do you know how stupid that sounds? This is Datalounge not the fucking Washington Post. And if you can't weed out the banter from the actual important news and ideas that have been shared here then you're either not paying attention or you're a troll. And frankly the banter is often good and much needed relief for some people so they're not exhausted and ready to give up because of all the fucking doom and gloom.

And the complaints are doubly funny coming from people who have no history of contributing anything in these threads but said complaint. Just saying.

by Anonymousreply 198July 26, 2018 1:40 PM

[quote]Seems like they kind of know that if Drumpf goes, so does Pence.

I don't think that's it. The fact is, they are deathly afraid of backlash from Trump voters if they say or do anything in opposition to Dear Leader.

by Anonymousreply 199July 26, 2018 1:42 PM

R196 Next they will go for misogyny. It's the women's fault for going through with the abortions. Trump only shows you how evil/misguided women who don't believe in the LORD are. The problem with religious people is they will believe anything concocted by those they have "faith" in. That is, they are born (again) suckers.

by Anonymousreply 200July 26, 2018 1:43 PM

R199 I don't know. I never hear of anyone talking about the possibility of a President Pence if the Don gets impeached.

by Anonymousreply 201July 26, 2018 1:43 PM

The dishonorable Mr. Gaetz wants to file a lawsuit against Twitter for unfair treatment of Republicans. Poor snowflake is just melting.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 202July 26, 2018 1:44 PM

r202, I DESPISE that fucker.

by Anonymousreply 203July 26, 2018 1:46 PM

And President Doofus will “look into it”, aka possibly start an investigation into Twitter’s “shadow banning”. You can’t make this shit up.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 204July 26, 2018 1:47 PM

R202 is the "unfair treatment," the shutting down of all their fake accounts?

by Anonymousreply 205July 26, 2018 1:48 PM

I know nothing about Gatez. He's a self-hating homosexual though, right?

by Anonymousreply 206July 26, 2018 1:48 PM

I think that they are also concerned that Pence -- who is an odd duck, a cold fish, and just generally unlikable -- would never be able to win in 2020.

by Anonymousreply 207July 26, 2018 1:49 PM

[quote]Why don’t the press defend reporters like Kaitlin and refuse to attend Sarah Huckabeast’s phony press conferences anymore

Kaitlin was the pool reporter. It was her job to do what she did and try to get answers even after handlers say "thank you, we're done here." The idiot boss often answers some of those shouted questions.

As far as defending the CNN reporter unfairly banned from the later event, NBC's chief WH correspondent Halle Jackson was on fire complaining about it this morning, and she said the DC press corps won't let such shit stand.

by Anonymousreply 208July 26, 2018 1:58 PM

The red, white and blue banners for U.S. President Donald Trump’s second-term campaign are ready to ship, emblazoned with the words “Keep America Great!”

But they are made in eastern China and soon could be hit by punitive tariffs of Trump’s own making as he ratchets up a rancorous trade dispute with Beijing.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 209July 26, 2018 2:07 PM

This is quite interesting. Clemson University researchers have tweets to prove Russian trolls attacked 2016 election.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 210July 26, 2018 2:23 PM

How about a batch of "This sign made in CHINA!! CHINA!!" stickers to slap on these signs, r209?

by Anonymousreply 211July 26, 2018 2:24 PM

Oh my!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 212July 26, 2018 2:39 PM

Re R209: I wonder if Pence's name will be missing from other campaign materials as well.

by Anonymousreply 213July 26, 2018 2:48 PM

Bravo, r198!

by Anonymousreply 214July 26, 2018 2:49 PM

Do we know yet the game Cohen is playing? Does he want the idiot king to call him personally and promise a pardon? Does he want it twitter-certified?

by Anonymousreply 215July 26, 2018 3:12 PM

R215 that's the came according to Avenatti.

by Anonymousreply 216July 26, 2018 3:21 PM

Speaking of the hottie.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 217July 26, 2018 3:21 PM

I think Cohen is counting on a better deal from Mueller than from Cheeto. And, he's probably right -- which, for this clown would be a first. Mueller might be able to influence the NY state authorities to go easy on Cohen if he cooperates, whereas Trump can't do anything as far as state charges are concerned. Lanny Davis is a very smart lawyer -- which Cohen is not. Lanny would know which avenue is going to produce the best results.

by Anonymousreply 218July 26, 2018 3:24 PM

Thanks, R217, he's been serving the heat in more ways than one

by Anonymousreply 219July 26, 2018 3:25 PM

In other words, R218, he served up the recording to show Mueller his hand...and others, but if he was already cooperating with Mueller, wouldn't he have been told to keep it wrapped up?

I'm at risk of sounding stupid here, but I really have no idea what game Cohen is playing here.

by Anonymousreply 220July 26, 2018 3:28 PM

About a month before Michael Cohen released his recording of a sensitive conversation he had with Donald Trump, the President's longtime attorney and adviser was agonizing over the silent treatment he was getting from his former boss.

"I don't understand why no one's calling me. I don't understand why no one's communicating with me," Cohen told Bo Dietl, a longtime friend and well-known private investigator who relayed the conversation to CNN.

"He was very taken aback that no one was communicating with him," Dietl said. "You're so close to somebody and all of a sudden they stop talking to you, you wonder what's happened."

Over the next month, Cohen began sending up flares, signaling that he was considering cooperating with federal prosecutors and that his ultimate loyalty would be not to Trump, but to his "family and country."

Sources close to Trump speculated that Cohen's release of the tape was his latest attempt to show Trump he means business and is prepared to provide prosecutors with damaging information about his former boss -- but they also said it was the wrong strategy, and that it was unlikely to make Trump eager to help Cohen legally or financially.

It's unclear if Cohen has any legally damning information to provide special counsel Robert Mueller about Trump. But the public breakup has only ramped up the speculation that Cohen will "flip" on the President.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 221July 26, 2018 3:29 PM

Someone clear something up for me. So these tapes that Cohen released... Im assuming they weren't taken in the raid? And because he's now revealed he still has tapes in his possession can't they get a warrant to take them?

by Anonymousreply 222July 26, 2018 3:32 PM

R222 The lawyers on the news are saying that having a witness to go along with the tapes so they can explain the details makes the tape evidence more valuable in court.

by Anonymousreply 223July 26, 2018 3:37 PM

I don't think that Mueller could give a rat's ass about those tapes as far as they involve payments to silence his ex-lovers. Yes, it is likely a violation of the law, but they have so many other things to charge Trump with that his conspiracy to commit election fraud would be way down on any list. And, I doubt that the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York cares much about them either. They were a titillating by-product of the raid, but the feds were after other information concerning different topics.

by Anonymousreply 224July 26, 2018 3:39 PM

Every time Trump does one of his tutting "too bad" tweets about Cohen, it hits my brain wrong. The whole thing feels like a set up. Like they're trying to plant Cohen in Mueller's office. Someone please talk me off the ledge.

by Anonymousreply 225July 26, 2018 3:40 PM

R222, I have wondered the same thing. Perhaps he made duplicates of everything and therefore investigators allowed him to keep the second set? That seems really weird though too, they likely would have had to listen to ALL of the duplicates to ascertain there wasn’t any new evidence on them. That takes a long time to do, investigators aren’t exactly known for returning evidence to people quickly.

The only other scenario I can think of is that prosecutors let Cohen keep these particular tapes because they don’t feel these tapes are of any value. And if THIS scenario is accurate, then wtf is on the tapes the government DID seize?

by Anonymousreply 226July 26, 2018 3:41 PM

R225.....get off the ledge.....

by Anonymousreply 227July 26, 2018 3:42 PM

R225, I understand where you're coming from, but I feel like Cohen's come too far to pull that. There'd be major league repercussions.

by Anonymousreply 228July 26, 2018 3:43 PM

It just seems really odd to me that they would let Cohen keep ANY tapes because it lets him do stuff like this (and possibly) use them to barter for a Pardon from Orange.

by Anonymousreply 229July 26, 2018 3:43 PM

odd, or oddly brilliant. Keep them a bit off guard, off balance, by allowing Cohen to do what he's doing

by Anonymousreply 230July 26, 2018 3:45 PM

R225 that’s not a crazy theory at all. Cohen has gone waaaaaay out of his way to be seen with our side; Donny Deutsch, Tom Arnold, the Reverend. Al Sharpton, Avenatti. Trump doesn’t normally tweet about people he fears. Why is he tweeting about Cohen is he fears him so much????So yes indeed, the whole thing could be a set up. I’m not saying I think that, but let’s be smart, they are indeed that conniving, scheming, and nasty. We would be stupid to not consider this. I’m on the fence on that theory. Until some more events or releases happen, it’s hard for me to say.

by Anonymousreply 231July 26, 2018 3:46 PM

If not is^

by Anonymousreply 232July 26, 2018 3:47 PM

Former President Donald Trump aide and Apprentice contestant Omarosa Manigault Newman has a memoir coming that her publisher calls "explosive" and "jaw-dropping."

The book is called Unhinged. Gallery Books announced Thursday that it will be released on Aug. 14.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 233July 26, 2018 3:48 PM

We would be stupid to trust anyone that was once an asset to Drumpf. They're all conniving, backstabbing, liars, no?

by Anonymousreply 234July 26, 2018 3:49 PM

[quote]The book is called Unhinged. Gallery Books announced Thursday that it will be released on Aug. 14.

"Oh, great. You mean I have to go even lower now?!"

by Anonymousreply 235July 26, 2018 3:49 PM

And r229 makes a strong point too. WHY did the government allow him to keep tapes knowing he could play this game and it could damage their case? Was there an under the table agreement made wherein they actually WANT Cohento do this, and that’s why they let him hold tapes? That is actually a million dollar question that I would like the answer to! If the government let him keep the tapes precisely so they could let him be the bad guy and do some PR damage to Trump (knowing that they canNOT get caught leaking), then kudos, it is soooooo overdue that they fight back. Maybe that’s why?

by Anonymousreply 236July 26, 2018 3:51 PM

Rudy Giuliani tweets:

Please be warned that Avenati is becoming desperate since he is being ignored. The Cohen-Cuomo tape makes clear Daniel claim is dead and with it Avenati’s meal ticket. Most media now consider him too much of a proven liar to put on. Any reliance is gross negligence.

by Anonymousreply 237July 26, 2018 3:54 PM

Unless Omarosa was blowing Trump in Melania’s closet, please don’t buy this whores book. Fire and Fury was worth it, but I don’t want this shyster to make money off of lies.

by Anonymousreply 238July 26, 2018 3:55 PM

That tweet by Giuliani is hilarious. How does it make Daniels claim die exactly lololololol? If anything it makes her case STRONGER, wtf is that old fool talking about?

by Anonymousreply 239July 26, 2018 4:05 PM

And further re: Ghouliani... wtf is he talking about? WHO is ignoring Avenatti? He's still everywhere.

#basta!

by Anonymousreply 240July 26, 2018 4:08 PM

r194 I walk amongst them. Once you figure out these people have no real religion but Republicanism they're pretty easy to predict.

by Anonymousreply 241July 26, 2018 4:13 PM

I would have to think that they must not care about Cohen (and maybe that's the issue and that's why he's scared)... otherwise wouldn't they just put a gag order on him?

by Anonymousreply 242July 26, 2018 4:14 PM

Jim Jordan just announced that he wants to replace Ryan as speaker!

He will take some time off from diddling little wrestlers.

by Anonymousreply 243July 26, 2018 4:16 PM

[quote]He will take some time off from diddling little wrestlers.

Now, now. In all he fairness, he didn’t fiddle any wrestlers. He just stood by, laughing, while some else did.

by Anonymousreply 244July 26, 2018 4:23 PM

Mueller is way too smart to get "set up" by Cohen and Trump.

by Anonymousreply 245July 26, 2018 4:24 PM

.....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 246July 26, 2018 4:24 PM

Tick tock motherfucker

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 247July 26, 2018 4:30 PM

Jordan is very ambitious. However, as disturbing as House Republicans may be, most will not embrace Jordan for being the Speaker of the House. Expect Kevin McCarthy are Scalise to get that job.

by Anonymousreply 248July 26, 2018 4:37 PM

^ or, not are

by Anonymousreply 249July 26, 2018 4:39 PM

[quote] Puerto Rican’s

[quote] Puerto Rican’s

[quote] ejumacated

[quote Basing an accusation against a menacing sociopolitical group in society on a 1950’s Broadway Musical.

[quote] —Really, you’re not helping

1) The writer apologized for the typos & explained he’d corrected the spellcheck but spellcheck overruled him

2) ejumacated is a word made up by George W Bush which is used sarcastically/satirically on Datalounge

by Anonymousreply 250July 26, 2018 4:44 PM

I love Rufus Sewell’s dsscription of Michael Cohen-“He looks like a kid playing a dog in the school play.”

by Anonymousreply 251July 26, 2018 4:44 PM

Actually, R248, none of them will be Speaker. That'll go to Pelosi or one of the Dems. But you are correct that Jordan is too extreme and now probably too tainted to lead the Rethugs.

by Anonymousreply 252July 26, 2018 4:47 PM

I was watching some show that discussed this on MSNBC or CNN, and they said Cohen was upset with Giuliani trying to lie and smear him, and just the way Trump and his people were attempting to marginalize him, so he released that tape specifically to show that Rudy is a liar.

I'll tell you one thing. Lanny Davis is not to be trifled with. Cohen was very aware of his background. Hiring him should have been a huge signal to Trump. And Lanny is not going to sign on with Cohen only to have Cohen get into some underhanded games to cooperate with Trump. No. I believe this is real.

I also believe Avenatti is all over the place. One minute he is "willing to talk to Cohen about representing him" another minute he thinks Cohen is playing us and is really still with Trump. I get it. Avenatti knows a lot of dirt on the Trump crowd. I get it that Avenatti had this client and was going after Cohen and Trump daily.

But things have changed and Avenatti is having trouble finding his footing amidst a very fluid situation, and revising his plan. I like Avenatti. He hates Trump but he is also taking full advantage of every opportunity to be out here on TV. It's like, "Stormy who?"

by Anonymousreply 253July 26, 2018 4:51 PM

Avenatti says there are more women paid off before the election and one of them includes a pregnancy. Probably not illegal but a Trump baby abortion, paid off close to the election, just might sink his boat all by itself. But they said on tv that the tapes were recorded on his cell phones that Cohen held on to and were taken in the raid.

Not sure how Cohen can leak them if the Feds still have the phones?

by Anonymousreply 254July 26, 2018 5:08 PM

Isn't the angle about the paid off women WHO paid them off (ie Enquirer) and if it is then considered an illegal campaign contribution or misuse of campaign funds?

by Anonymousreply 255July 26, 2018 5:12 PM

NEW: Loyal Trump CFO Allen Weisselberg has been summoned to testify before a grand jury in the Michael Cohen probe.

Bloomberg: Trump should be worried. Allen Weisselberg has worked for the Trump family since the 1970s, and knows more about the Trump Organization’s history and finances than nearly anyone.

by Anonymousreply 256July 26, 2018 5:26 PM

In the first years of the Apprentice, there was a guy who was Trump's right hand, very smart guy. Older. I think his name was George. Is he still around? I bet he knows tons of crap. Also, there was Carolyn - who ran his New Jersey golf club. She was shrewd and very loyal to him. They should talk to her. Trump fired her when she got a lower score than him at the Tahoe golf tournament!

by Anonymousreply 257July 26, 2018 5:31 PM

The Press is already putting a hit on Jim Jordan. Good, drag his reputation to the ground.

Politico:

[quote]‘[bold]A cesspool of deviancy[/bold]’: New [bold]claims of voyeurism[/bold] test Jordan denials

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 258July 26, 2018 5:35 PM

Who's Jordan running against back home and is there any chance we can dump his ass in November?

by Anonymousreply 259July 26, 2018 5:37 PM

Damn! Politico goes Nifty

[quote] they were regularly harassed in their training facility by sexually aggressive men who attended the university or worked there. The voyeurs would masturbate while watching the wrestlers shower or sit in the sauna, or engage in sexual acts in the areas where the athletes trained,

by Anonymousreply 260July 26, 2018 5:40 PM

Oh, dear god I don't believe in, please let Trump tweets be the thing that brings him down...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 261July 26, 2018 6:01 PM

Ooh gurl

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 262July 26, 2018 6:07 PM

Decomposed Body Found in Waters Off Trump Golf Resort

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 263July 26, 2018 6:08 PM

I have a strong suspicion that their is an abortion somewhere in the mix.

by Anonymousreply 264July 26, 2018 6:09 PM

Fuck! They weren't supposed to find that until after 2020.

Stephen! Bring me the axe!

by Anonymousreply 265July 26, 2018 6:10 PM

Did Trump put a hit on someone ??

by Anonymousreply 266July 26, 2018 6:11 PM

there

by Anonymousreply 267July 26, 2018 6:13 PM

Seriously, are they offing people now?

by Anonymousreply 268July 26, 2018 6:13 PM

You know I have that scene playing out in my head. From a Few Good Men. Nicholson and Tom Cruise. I see Mueller questioning Trump about Comey and Sessions and his tweets. "Did you order the Code Red?" "You're damned right I ordered the Code Red!!!"

by Anonymousreply 269July 26, 2018 6:17 PM

i am sure they have been offing people all along

by Anonymousreply 270July 26, 2018 6:17 PM

I wonder if this will lead to its own thread or murder charges?

by Anonymousreply 271July 26, 2018 6:18 PM

R251 that is hilarious!

by Anonymousreply 272July 26, 2018 6:19 PM

He has committed so many crimes, murder would be nothing to him. But the only people he would be willing to murder, 13 year old girls.

by Anonymousreply 273July 26, 2018 6:22 PM

[quote]Who's Jordan running against back home and is there any chance we can dump his ass in November?

He's pretty safe, gerrymandering has seen to that.

by Anonymousreply 274July 26, 2018 6:27 PM

[quote]New claims of voyeurism test Jordan denials

HOT! I mean horrible...

by Anonymousreply 275July 26, 2018 6:28 PM

[quote]It just seems really odd to me that they would let Cohen keep ANY tapes because it lets him do stuff like this (and possibly) use them to barter for a Pardon

Yeah, I wondered about this, too. But they aren't actually "physical" tapes, they are digital recordings, right? And they had to be given back to Cohen and his team as part of the review of privilege. O of course he would have it. But do we even know if it was his side that "leaked?" it could have been a tactical move by Team Rudy if they think it's all gonna come out anyway.

by Anonymousreply 276July 26, 2018 6:28 PM

The Politico piece is very damning. There is no way Jim Jordan makes it to November. He'll be a gonner just before the elections.

by Anonymousreply 277July 26, 2018 6:29 PM

He can try to bluff his way through it but he's not Trump, he'll lose.

Good. I'm sick of his bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 278July 26, 2018 6:30 PM

[quote]The Politico piece is very damning.

It's also three weeks old -- and unfortunately, it doesn't seem to have had much effect. Certainly didn't keep Jordan from making a play for Speaker of the House.

by Anonymousreply 279July 26, 2018 6:33 PM

r263 the body's in the Bronx, in the East River, see? Cement shoes are so 1930s, nyaah! It was a pigeon, and we don't like pigeons, see? We had to take the pigeon for a ride, nyaah!

by Anonymousreply 280July 26, 2018 6:40 PM

R279 isn't reading the press and watching the news in Ohio's 4th (and the rest of Ohio) where Jordan's voters live. This story is huge, it's covered every single day and his "play" for Speaker is the desperate act of a desperate man.

Sweet.

by Anonymousreply 281July 26, 2018 6:44 PM

I have R279 blocked as a troll

by Anonymousreply 282July 26, 2018 7:02 PM

Kyle Griffin: "Privately, some Trump lawyers have expressed concern that Mueller will stitch together several episodes, encounters and pieces of evidence, like tweets, to build a case that Trump embarked on a broad effort to interfere with the investigation, NYT reports."

Umm, isn't that how the legal system works?

by Anonymousreply 283July 26, 2018 7:15 PM

R283

by Anonymousreply 284July 26, 2018 7:15 PM

Re: Cohen. He’s not being investigated by Mueller, but by the Southern District of NY. He can’t be embedded in any way in the Mueller investigation.

As for the recordings, Cohen made them on his iPhone; they probably “live” in cloud storage somewhere, so Cohen can download them any time he wants to.

by Anonymousreply 285July 26, 2018 7:44 PM

Ode to My President

He cometh, I was shocked

He spoke, I was mocked

I valiantly tried to resist

But his macho thrust just persist

I was vulnerable and overcome with vapors

How, I wondered, could I cope with his capers

Handling gentleman has been my expertise

Then I lay on my fainting couch covered by fleece

And much to my delighted surprise

An invitation to a golf outing got me to arise

It was such a wonderful good time

Just watching him take strokes observing his behind

On the ninth hole he pulled me aside

Conveying he has something important to confide

He said I know your secrets my dear

Work with me, and you will have no fear

A Russian birdie told me about your dallies

He was quite specific following one of my rallies

He handed me a pile of printed Emails and pics

None had chicks, but plenty of dicks

I said, Mr. President I am at your disposal

He replied, I have a proposal

He said help rid these witch hunt investigations

and I will keep secret your naughty relations

He says you must obsessively kiss my butt

More eager than when Sarah visits Pizza Hut

Thank you Mr. President I do declare

You must know how much I care

by Anonymousreply 286July 26, 2018 7:45 PM

[quote]Loyal Trump CFO Allen Weisselberg has been summoned to testify before a grand jury in the Michael Cohen probe.

WaPo's Philip Rucker: Just got off phone with a former Trump Org employee who echoed @KatyTurNBC reporting on Weisselberg subpoena: “Alan knows everything and anything about all the financials...He knows every dollar that goes in and every dollar that leaves. He knows where all the bodies are buried.”

by Anonymousreply 287July 26, 2018 7:48 PM

You can take the Ohio rep out of the the trailer park, but you can’t take the trailer park out of the Ohio rep.

by Anonymousreply 288July 26, 2018 7:50 PM

Jordan's district has an R+14 lean and hasn't elected a Democrat since 1937. This is the sort of thing that could do it, though.

by Anonymousreply 289July 26, 2018 7:57 PM

[quote]I have a strong suspicion that their is an abortion somewhere in the mix.

Yes, several. Maybe a few even in the past year... so don't you bitches ever say I'm not a patriot.

by Anonymousreply 290July 26, 2018 8:00 PM

The steam of consciousness tweets might just be the decisive evidence. Before social media, popping off in anger or jealousy was not so very public, and built in some cooling off period.

Let alone raging on Twitter deliberately to try to influence an investigation into yourself or your cronies.

by Anonymousreply 291July 26, 2018 8:08 PM

Meant to type "stream of consciousness."

But "steam" makes the same point. Maybe better.

by Anonymousreply 292July 26, 2018 8:10 PM

Nicely done R286

by Anonymousreply 293July 26, 2018 8:14 PM

I foresee a Jim Jordan-inspired porno coming down the pike.

"Gym Jorden's Wrestler Voyeur Orgy."

by Anonymousreply 294July 26, 2018 8:18 PM

r266....its not the first body....I want to know the sex....for all we know, they could be the bodies of the underage girls he claimed to off because they wouldnt keep their mouths shut (i.e. Maria)....I wouldnt be surprised.

Re : Jim Jordans district....they are coming for him hard....billboards, posters, planes with banners....if he survies, Ill be shocked....seriously.

by Anonymousreply 295July 26, 2018 8:24 PM

WSJ confirms "U.S. Person 2" referred to in the Maria Butina indictment is George O'Neill Jr., Rockefeller heir and conservative writer.

Court papers describe Ms. Butina discussing with Americans the idea of holding “friendship dinners” to bring together Russians with politically active Americans. One of those Americans, prosecutors say, hosted such a dinner in February 2017 before that year’s National Prayer Breakfast.

Mr. O’Neill, an heir to the Rockefeller fortune and an outspoken advocate of closer ties with Russia, hosted that event, as he confirmed in a magazine column. The charging documents say Ms. Butina told him that a representative of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s administration had approved “building this communications channel.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 296July 26, 2018 8:26 PM

Every one should reread R287.

by Anonymousreply 297July 26, 2018 8:41 PM

Janet Garrett, who's running against Jim Jordan, has run against him multiple times. Last time she got about a third of the vote. She's campaigning on health care and women's rights. Retired teacher and, yep, she's just had a fundraising surge. Joe Trippi, who helped get Doug Jones elected, is consulting.

by Anonymousreply 298July 26, 2018 8:42 PM

[quote]Fuck! They weren't supposed to find that until after 2020.

by Anonymousreply 299July 26, 2018 8:42 PM

Sooooooo......many of the wealthy want to go back in time to when the wealthy had fiefdoms? And surfs? And indentured servants? And no rights or laws for anyone? Constant use of bribery and blackmail? Usury? No education? Because they don’t have enough? And they think we have way too much? Like in the 1400’s?

by Anonymousreply 300July 26, 2018 8:44 PM

@ABCPolitics:

NEW: California Rep. Dana Rohrabacher met with alleged Russian agent Maria Butina in 2015, her emails reveal, fueling more questions about his longstanding Kremlin connections

by Anonymousreply 301July 26, 2018 8:56 PM

There are many political sites/threads out there, but DL takes cake in a good way. DL gives no mercy to Ruskie trolls, can find details that are not extensively covered; and the characterization of certain political figures are frequently quite amusing.

by Anonymousreply 302July 26, 2018 8:58 PM

Пожалуйста, пожалуйста, пожалуйста, здесь нет истории. Дана - «ничего гамбургер».

ОСТАВЬ ЕГО!!!

by Anonymousreply 303July 26, 2018 9:03 PM

Did it really only take one Russian woman and the entire Repug party fell at her feet? Fucking idiot Repugs.

by Anonymousreply 304July 26, 2018 9:06 PM

But that's some good pussy for the 1/3 of us that prefer pussy

by Anonymousreply 305July 26, 2018 9:13 PM

I believe that she is not unique r305..

by Anonymousreply 306July 26, 2018 9:15 PM

r304....really ?.....there are far more than one, they just havent been exposed publicly yet.....remember, the Butina charging documents state that there are secret societies within the GOP that are aligned with Russia. It even states that they were forced underground when the Russia investigation and Mueller started to shine a spotlight on them.....but they are very active. The GOP can deny it all they want, but their actions betray them.

by Anonymousreply 307July 26, 2018 9:20 PM

I want to hear more about the secret societies!!!!! I’m serious, that will be juicy!!!!

by Anonymousreply 308July 26, 2018 9:22 PM

"Hello? Entire RNC directory except Lindsay Graham? Hey guys, it’s Mariia. So, listen, this is kind of awkward, but I just got some bad news. I have this STD thing and it might have been after you, but it might have been before. I can’t tell. Anyway, you might want to get yourself checked."

by Anonymousreply 309July 26, 2018 9:25 PM

We all know as many have speculated, that when the lid comes off this scandal, its going to be HUGE, and it will encompass many more facets than we could ever imagine.

by Anonymousreply 310July 26, 2018 9:29 PM

Chuck Todd is taking suggestions for a stronger word than "meddling" to describe what Putin did. Good. I hope the idea takes. And I’m all for swapping out "collusion" and replacing it with "conspiracy", too.

by Anonymousreply 311July 26, 2018 9:33 PM

I prefer the traditional ESPIONAGE!

by Anonymousreply 312July 26, 2018 9:36 PM

Yeah meddling is such a pat term.

by Anonymousreply 313July 26, 2018 9:40 PM

How about digital Pearl Harbor.

by Anonymousreply 314July 26, 2018 9:46 PM

That works.

by Anonymousreply 315July 26, 2018 9:53 PM

Tamper instead of meddle.

by Anonymousreply 316July 26, 2018 9:54 PM

Fucking hack. They hacked the fucking vote and literally changed votes. That’s the fucking word.

by Anonymousreply 317July 26, 2018 9:57 PM

From that Politico article on Jordan, clearly they’ve been reading the DL:

[quote] Larkins Hall, the building that housed athletic teams, became such a well-known target that people who frequented it at the time have reminisced in anonymous postings online how easy it was to ogle naked members of the wrestling team.

by Anonymousreply 318July 26, 2018 9:58 PM

[quote]Chuck Todd is taking suggestions for a stronger word than "meddling" to describe what Putin did. Good. I hope the idea takes. And I’m all for swapping out "collusion" and replacing it with "conspiracy", too.

The IC called this an attack on our electoral process and hence, on our democracy. Did Chuck-e-Cheese Toad just fall from the sky that he doesn't know and never heard that?

Chucky Toad is a pathetic sad excuse for a politico.

by Anonymousreply 319July 26, 2018 10:00 PM

if you know something, say something.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 320July 26, 2018 10:02 PM

Chucky Todd can't bring himself to say that *gasp* Hillary might have won after all. He quickly reverts to his BernieBro comfort zone.

by Anonymousreply 321July 26, 2018 10:03 PM

We all know how Prez Bone Spurs operates. He is the King of projection. Since the idea of the election being actually changed triggers him something fierce, then he KNOWS votes were changed. Bet on it!

by Anonymousreply 322July 26, 2018 10:06 PM

[quote]Fucking hack. They hacked the fucking vote and literally changed votes. That’s the fucking word.

The hackers (grunts) hacked. The top dog ordered an attack, of which the hacking was part. There is also the issue of creating a 5th column, aka NRA, and penetrate the GOP, espionage, threats against Browder etc. etc. etc

by Anonymousreply 323July 26, 2018 10:06 PM

Russian hackers going after McCaskill

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 324July 26, 2018 10:16 PM

Missourians need to rally around her, regardless of party, to show strength in the face of a foreign enemy.

by Anonymousreply 325July 26, 2018 10:20 PM

[quote]I have a strong suspicion that their is an abortion somewhere in the mix.

I ALWAYS thought that. Going back to before the election, I was expecting it to come out and the Franklin Grahams and Jerry Falwell Jrs having to furiously tap-dance to explain that it was okay.

by Anonymousreply 326July 26, 2018 10:33 PM

This is a long read but worth it.

[quote]A 16-year-old hacker broke into as ExpressPoll voting machine used by Georgia in 45 minutes. Another cyberhacker showed how he could change votes in the WINvote machine used in Virginia, Pennsylvania and Mississippi, with only a computer, a mouse and a Microsoft Word document, as long as he had the password. But the hacker soon discovered that WINvote machines all had the same password. The password, which could not be changed, was (you might want to take a deep breath) “abcde.”

[quote]A recent report by the New York Times detailed how a Pennsylvania auditor checking his state’s voting system found remote access software on the system that tallies votes. Electronic Systems & Software, the company that makes those machines, is the biggest voting machine manufacturer in America. To be clear, this was not a voting machine. The system that counts votes had software installed that allowed a person who was not on the scene to gain access to the voting results. But the strangest part of this revelation was why the machine was being audited in the first place: Pennsylvania voters complained that the ES&S machines were changing or “flipping” votes.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 327July 26, 2018 10:36 PM

[quote]The password, which could not be changed, was (you might want to take a deep breath) “abcde.”

What. The. Fuck.

by Anonymousreply 328July 26, 2018 10:41 PM

And we have to remind ourselves that all these "official" reports, and troll comment on social media, of the general public losing faith in Democrats and individual party members of the Democratic Party are done to establish the narrative that these are the very valid reasons why the mid-term election hardly made an dent (meaning the Dems didn't win that many seats) and it has nothing to do with Russia hacking an election again.

by Anonymousreply 329July 26, 2018 10:42 PM

The article also talks about how when it was discovered the only way to check Georgia's records to see if anything had been changed was to compare files to the backup files.... Georgia quickly wiped the hard drive with the back up files.

Let that sink in.

by Anonymousreply 330July 26, 2018 10:45 PM

Trump should go down in history as iPOTUS. Illegitimate President of the United States or Putin's bitch.

by Anonymousreply 331July 26, 2018 10:53 PM

this is for r309, a tweet posted today by the wife of now identified "US Person #2" George O'Neill in the Maria Butina indictment

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 332July 26, 2018 10:55 PM

So instead of POTUS, use PUTIN'S.

by Anonymousreply 333July 26, 2018 10:57 PM

r332 Well she certainly does not seem like a total lunatic.

by Anonymousreply 334July 26, 2018 11:01 PM

They better leave Claire alone. I like her. She’s always sticking her fingers in the eyes of repugs.

by Anonymousreply 335July 26, 2018 11:03 PM

I love the image of Nancy Pelosi as a Mafia meemaw.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 336July 26, 2018 11:04 PM

Did I hear Jeffery Toobin on CNN correctly? I thought he said that Trump, as President, couldn't be indicted or prosecuted, but the Special Counsel would deliver a report through the DOJ whereby it would be up to Congress to decide whether or not to impeach. Then another panelist said a Democratic Congress would impeach, but the Senate would not convict.

I find this difficult to believe. If Trump is determined to have engaged in a conspiracy with a hostile foreign power to swing an election, then engaged in obstruction of a judicial investigation, and also its determined he engaged in financial crimes, such as tax evasion or money laundering;. all that is rendered is a damn report? A damn report for politicians to squabble about and ultimately leave Trump in office?

by Anonymousreply 337July 26, 2018 11:13 PM

The damage is done. Deplorables are going into hiding and the rest sense the tide is turning.

The tariffs did him in.

by Anonymousreply 338July 26, 2018 11:16 PM

I was listening to a Progressive Radio station earlier and a caller called in with a story about how her husband checked his voter registration and found that he had been removed from the voter rolls for no reason. She checked hers and was fine. She decided to check again two months later and she had been purged. Make sure you're checking your voter registration and do it often. And make sure those around you are doing the same (unless they're Rethugs!)

by Anonymousreply 339July 26, 2018 11:22 PM

Omg. R339, I think that’s actually sage advice we can all actually USE — check your registration once a month between now and the midterms. Take a screen shot each time. Use social media to tell others to do the same.

Two good reasons to do this; 1) we all need to make sure we can actually vote this fall and 2) it's yet another step toward helping the general population accept that we WERE mother fucking hacked in the 2016 election. I think the IC is super close to admitting this to the people, anything we can do to help them tip toward admitting it publicly is good.

The IC MUST tell the people the truth, it is the only way forward!!!!! Americans WILL accept it and move on. The people must have the Truth.

by Anonymousreply 340July 26, 2018 11:30 PM

Reading R327's article, all I can think is this:

We better learn that there were absolutely no votes changed. Lie to me, if you must. I don't care.

Because if I find out that Trump lost the election, that Hillary won fair and square and we know it for a fact... but there are no "do overs," no rescinding everything Trump has done, every executive order or bill he's signed, every judge he's appointed, everything... If I find out that we're still stuck with this motherfucker even though the entire world knows he's an illegitimate president I will NOT be able to contain myself.

by Anonymousreply 341July 26, 2018 11:35 PM

R341, bitch wake up!!! (Slap to the face!). That’s EXACTLY what happened! And that’s EXACTLY what we are dealing with. Now what the fuck are you going to do about it? Pull your head out if the sand — that. Is. What. Happened.

So now what? I’ll TELLyou what. We start a national conversation on what to DO. Laws. Rules. Undoing. Repairing. Evolving. Fighting. Insisting. That is what we do!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 342July 26, 2018 11:42 PM

R341 we already KNOW that that is exactly what happened.

And because we should not forget, this has been posted in several of the threads:

[quote]There's already proof. I work in the industry. I sat in a meeting with the head of cyber security investigations for the FBI in Florida. Their systems were hacked in 2016. What's difficult is proving that (or more accurately stated "how") the votes were manipulated. But go back to election night and remember how Trump pulled ahead in Florida, NC, MI, PA and WI. It happened almost like clock work once the precincts reporting crossed the 50% threshold. This shit is deep. Putin had already done this in his own election and also in Ukraine. We should be very worried about the EU elections coming up.

by Anonymousreply 343July 26, 2018 11:43 PM

I figure Butina isn't the only Russian spy working this but she's involved in everything. No matter where we turn, there she is, right in the middle of every picture, organizing every event, in contact with every Repug and every Repug organization out there. It's an insane level of involvement for this one woman.

And, again, not one Dem in sight anywhere near her or, seemingly, any of the systemic corruption. I figured by now there would have been one lonely, desperate Democrat from a red state somehow connected to her but, nope, not one...and you know that Faux News is looking.

by Anonymousreply 344July 26, 2018 11:48 PM

[quote] I'd bet Putin wants to know who is spying on him.

Putin knows who is spying on him. He’s the former head of counterintelligence for the KGB, not some babe in the woods.

by Anonymousreply 345July 26, 2018 11:50 PM

And to emphasize the article at r327, why in the fuck would Russia go to aaaaaaaalllll that trouble of phishing, hacking, breaching, but for naught? Just to look around? Just to take a whiff, giggle, and run away? No!!!!! They BREACHED to DO. And the “do” was ALTER. THE. VOTE.

So spare me your angst that Hillary lost after rightfully winning, I was there a fucking year and a half ago!!!!!! Where the fuck were you who are claiming you can’t handle the idea that Hillary actually won?!?!? I’m serious, where the fuck have you been?????? Yes, it is probably the greatest travesty in our history ONLY matched by the Civil War. It is unfathomable. And yet it is. So now we MUST move forward with that knowledge so that this can never ever ever ever ever happen again, to any party, to any VOTER. It is the ultimate betrayal of a voter, and it must be our mission to stop it from ever ever happening again.

by Anonymousreply 346July 26, 2018 11:50 PM

And we can smart by demanding some amazing journalism on these Russian Secret Societies!!! What do we need to do to charge people for that?

First Congress must formally declare us to be at war with Russia, yes? THEN they can be charged with treason, correct? We are at war, and I want ALL of them in prison.

by Anonymousreply 347July 26, 2018 11:53 PM

r346 some people take awhile to wake up. For the Democratic wave to happen the always-aware have to wake up the sleepyheads and show them how their nation's been damaged, how at risk it is, and how the "independents" or "never-voted-before" types can help correct the direction. The arbiters and facilitators should also work on the outraged and polarized grudgeholders like me: "they're not monsters. They're not programmed Deplorables. They've been misled and rubbing their noses in their abstentions will not win them over. Share the facts with them without namecalling."

by Anonymousreply 348July 27, 2018 12:00 AM

I know, r348, I know. I’m actually not even angry at the sleepyheads because I think we are ALL victims. They took advantage of everyone.

But what I can no longer do is swaddle people in silky blankies when they have to consider that Hillary won fairly, and they don’t want to believe it because it scares them. Too fucking bad!!!! We all need to be brave right now, not weak.

But you bring up very strong strategies for how to successfully handle this in real-life, and I’m glad you shared that.

by Anonymousreply 349July 27, 2018 12:05 AM

Look, I'm well aware that this is exactly what happened. It's not even remotely a surprise.

As for "what are you gonna do about it?" just what the hell do you think anyone can do about it? I mean, get real. You think Trump would step aside? You think the GOP would ask him to? You think they're gonna give us our SCOTUS picks back when they wouldn't give us the last one that was rightfully Obama's in the first place? You think they're gonna be like, "Oh, okay, Hills, you can be president now"...?

We would never even be TOLD that actual votes were changed. They can't afford to tell us because there would be utter pandemonium, a complete breakdown in the security of our democracy's most important institution. You think the culture war and the war between right and left is bad now? Just imagine when Trump's base is told the guy they voted for isn't the president. FAKE NEWS! Are you kidding? They have all the fucking guns and just the right amount--however tiny--of intelligence to know where to point them.

There is absolutely fuck-all that can be done about the last election. Anyone entertaining dreams of Hillary kicking this fascist fuck out of the Oval Office needs to wake up.

The only thing we can do is vote them out and vote Dems in the next chance we get.

You want to stick up and fight for something? Fight for election security so this shit doesn't happen again. But good luck with that when the entire GOP is in on the action.

by Anonymousreply 350July 27, 2018 12:07 AM

[quote] The damage is done. Deplorables are going into hiding and the rest sense the tide is turning. The tariffs did him in

Wow, some of you people are beyond delusional. The Trumpsters are crowing that he forced the EU to negotiate with him over the tariffs and he got concessions from them.. Deplorables say it’s a win for him. Even CNBC headlines say Trump got concessions from the EU. His voters see him winning again.

I dont know what planet some of you live on, pronouncing Trump is over every few days and that deplorables are admitting they were wrong and abandoning him. That is never going to happen; they’ll never abandon him.

by Anonymousreply 351July 27, 2018 12:08 AM

[quote]Anyone entertaining dreams of Hillary kicking this fascist fuck out of the Oval Office needs to wake up.

And who has said anything of the sort?

by Anonymousreply 352July 27, 2018 12:15 AM

Um, r350, I don’t know why you’re challenging me when that’s exactly what I said we should do? I said, with great passion, that we need to stop future elections from being hacked. That was the biggest point I made. I am not a “do-over” person, never was.

And no shit, it’s going to be a war. No shit our Congress is literally invested with cockroaches. But I think you sound like a first-class pussy when you talk about Deplorables and their guns. And I think you sound like a wimp when you say there would be pandemonium if we were told the truth. We are IN pandemonium now! The only way to truly fix this is for the IC to say the TRUTH.

Either way, we’re on the same side.

by Anonymousreply 353July 27, 2018 12:15 AM

I’ve always know that the G.O.P was evil and the rank and file were mostly gullible fools. But I did believe that they were loyal to the U.S., in their convoluted way.

I now know they will stand by and look the other way while the country itself is being sold out to our enemies.

This is a tough pill to swallow, even when considering how low they’ve gone in the past.

by Anonymousreply 354July 27, 2018 12:15 AM

r336.....remember this....fucking hysterical.....can imagine if all the older women in the DNC came out as mobsters ?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 355July 27, 2018 12:15 AM

R350 If we do as you say, what are the consequences to make anyone think twice about this happening again? That it happened is already worse case scenario. We simply couldn't allow the cheaters to stay in power especially if they knew about it.

by Anonymousreply 356July 27, 2018 12:15 AM

When is Gawker coming back?

by Anonymousreply 357July 27, 2018 12:17 AM

R356, so what do you propose is the best solution? I’m not the poster you’re addressing.

by Anonymousreply 358July 27, 2018 12:22 AM

r349 violently shaking someone by the shoulders is an effective wakeup method for most. I applaud you,, because I would not be swaddling and cooing these Americans into alertness. I've been lambasting and wailing on DL for at least six months about the "durrrr wait, I was supposed to vote?" "are you sure Hillary and Tim wouldn't be ordering ICE to ramp up deportations, because they're all the same to me?" millions. I would be swinging a fire iron at their heads. You are firm yet more stable. I applaud your efforts.

by Anonymousreply 359July 27, 2018 12:26 AM

R358 I don't know because it all depends on if they can prove whether or not Pres Tre45on and others, knew or not. If they knew, then everything he has done is null and void. If votes were changed and it is proved, how can we not install the proper leader? I don't see any other way. And her full term would start the day she is sworn in.

If not, then this can and will be repeated. It's going to be ugly and things may get very dangerous but that is what happens when you fuck with democracy and get caught.

by Anonymousreply 360July 27, 2018 12:26 AM

Can you imagine if they removed Trump and installed Clinton....deplorable heads would EXPLODE.

by Anonymousreply 361July 27, 2018 12:29 AM

Conservative, Pro-Trump Activist to Feds: Investigate Bill Shine Now

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 362July 27, 2018 12:34 AM

I like to think that posting and starting threads is just a small part of my contribution to Le Resistance.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 363July 27, 2018 12:34 AM

Georgia is one of several states that had zero paper ballot backup. No paper tallies, and machine tabulation. Yet they claim their methodology is safe. How they know for sure?

by Anonymousreply 364July 27, 2018 12:35 AM

R361 easy solution for that!

If they can get Drumpf's ass thrown in jail and install Clinton all they do is get a message out to Deplorables... we're putting her in because it's obviously the only way we can FINALLY throw her ass in jail! Yay, Murica!!!!

by Anonymousreply 365July 27, 2018 12:35 AM

Well r359, I’m only shaking them violently by the shoulders because my knuckles still hurt from my set brawl.

by Anonymousreply 366July 27, 2018 12:36 AM

And also I'm tired of hearing about Deplorable heads exploding. So what? Let them. Everyone keeps acting like they're this huge majority when in fact they're a fucking very small minority.

Tick Tock Motherfucker!

by Anonymousreply 367July 27, 2018 12:36 AM

My LAST brawl hate autocorrect

by Anonymousreply 368July 27, 2018 12:36 AM

r367....calm down toots.....the comment meant that it would be hysterical to watch.

by Anonymousreply 369July 27, 2018 12:39 AM

And r367, you are correct, that’s a myth/misconception that we must shatter once and for all. Truth, Justice, and liberty must not cow to fear. Push their reaction out of your mind, you’ve been tricked into thinking they outnumber us — that’s a lie! We VASTLY outnumber them AND they are mostly isolated in their own communities. There isn’t really a lot of intermingling. They aren’t going to come stampeding into cities. I really think it’s just a fear, no more, no less.

by Anonymousreply 370July 27, 2018 12:43 AM

R369 I'm referring to the constant pussyfooting around Deplorables in general.

by Anonymousreply 371July 27, 2018 12:44 AM

r367 indeed. I hope the Good Lord takes a likin' to those Deplorables

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 372July 27, 2018 12:45 AM

Rachel Maddow is talking about Tad Devine tonight on her show and his connection to Manafort.

Tune in.

by Anonymousreply 373July 27, 2018 1:03 AM

Maddow is on it. First time I have seen this mess tied to Bernie by an anchor.

by Anonymousreply 374July 27, 2018 1:06 AM

Thank you r373!!!!

by Anonymousreply 375July 27, 2018 1:07 AM

Did you see Trump's body language as he walked across the lawn from Marine One?

He is PISSED!!!

by Anonymousreply 376July 27, 2018 1:08 AM

Allen Weiselberg is Trump Co's CFO.

He has been subpoenaed by Feds in NY.

Rachel is on it.

by Anonymousreply 377July 27, 2018 1:08 AM

Is CNN going to cover Tad Devine? They are so obsessed with bringing on Bernie. Next time, they need to ask Bernie some serious questions about Tad, rather than hear Bernie rail about having free tuition.

by Anonymousreply 378July 27, 2018 1:12 AM

R378 he'll just deflect and bring up Hillary.

Kind of like someone else always does, no?

by Anonymousreply 379July 27, 2018 1:15 AM

CNN: Michael Cohen is prepared to tell Mueller that Trump knew in advance of Don Jr.’s meeting with the Russians.

Giuliani is currently on Chris Cuomos’s show, attacking Cohen’s credibikity with great abandon.

by Anonymousreply 380July 27, 2018 1:18 AM

Oh look, Ghouliani has been sent to CNN to discredit Cohen's credibility.

by Anonymousreply 381July 27, 2018 1:18 AM

[quote]Giuliani is currently on Chris Cuomos’s show, attacking Cohen’s credibikity with great abandon.

Oh good, means they're worried.

by Anonymousreply 382July 27, 2018 1:22 AM

Now Rachel's breaking the same news about Cohen claiming he witnessed Don Jr TELL his father about the Russian meeting that took place in June 2016.

If this is true....it is HUGE!!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 383July 27, 2018 1:24 AM

The end of Trump is near. There will be dancing in the streets. The deplorable tears will be a sight to see.

by Anonymousreply 384July 27, 2018 1:24 AM

Rachel also talked about the Daily Beast report on the identified Russian hacking attempt against Sen. McCaskill. Earlier during Chris Hayes, the DB reporter said a senior something in her office / campaign actually clicked on the phishing link in the email. Lucky for them, Microsoft said they were monitoring and were able to intercept the attack so the hackers weren't successful in that instance.

Can I just say, it's 2018. It's two years after the devastating hacks into Podesta's email account and whatnot. One might think that congressmen especially Dems, will have sent their staff to a bootcamp training on cyber-security and drill in their heads to NOT CLICK ON A LINK ASKING FOR A PASSWORD. And yet, stupidity abounds. Someone will still click the damn thing!

by Anonymousreply 385July 27, 2018 1:25 AM

Cohen has everything. If he flips...

Game over?

by Anonymousreply 386July 27, 2018 1:26 AM

“Michael Cohen is prepared to tell Mueller that Trump knew in advance of Don Jr.’s meeting with the Russians.”

If that is true... our threads won’t make it to 50.

by Anonymousreply 387July 27, 2018 1:27 AM

Rudy: Cohen is a lying liar who lies about everything, everybody knows he’s always lied about everything.

Cuomo: Then why did Trump put his trust in Cohen for decades?

Rudy: Look, a squirrel!

(I’m paraphrasing slightly.)

by Anonymousreply 388July 27, 2018 1:27 AM

SQUIRREL!!!

by Anonymousreply 389July 27, 2018 1:28 AM

If it ends this Trump abomination r387, I'm willing to make the sacrifice.

by Anonymousreply 390July 27, 2018 1:28 AM

Where did Rachel get this news re: Cohen being ready to say this?

Also, he can't just say it he must have proof...

by Anonymousreply 391July 27, 2018 1:28 AM

I'd love to see something like this, R384.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 392July 27, 2018 1:28 AM

Trump definitely seems a bit rattled. At the non-campaign events he has been treated as campaign rallies (I am sure some GOP oversight committee will call him out on that), his lies are getting bigger and more frequent and he has gotten even worse about making everything come back to how great he is and everything he does is the best ever.

by Anonymousreply 393July 27, 2018 1:28 AM

R385 The Traitor Trump Party will stall as long as they can no doubt. But the Blue Wave will come fast and furious with this news. Americans love to see the downfall of the rich and powerful, especially if they are a despicable ass like Trump.

by Anonymousreply 394July 27, 2018 1:29 AM

R391, CNN reporting, but she just said NBC confirming that Cohen claims to have been present with several other people and Cheeto, when Don Jr. told Cheeto about the offer for a meeting.

by Anonymousreply 395July 27, 2018 1:30 AM

Good by Trump!!

by Anonymousreply 396July 27, 2018 1:30 AM

GAME OVER.

by Anonymousreply 397July 27, 2018 1:30 AM

Michael Cohen says Trump Sr. knew about the Trump Tower meeting with the Russians in advance and approved it in advance. CNN and MSNBC reporting it out.

by Anonymousreply 398July 27, 2018 1:31 AM

Seriously, did anybody ever have any doubt that Trump Sr. knew? I figured all along that sonny boy told his dad about the meeting.

by Anonymousreply 399July 27, 2018 1:32 AM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 400July 27, 2018 1:32 AM

Duh, sorry, I posted it real quick without checking the thread first.

by Anonymousreply 401July 27, 2018 1:33 AM

Although Deplorables still won't care because remember, they're on record for saying they're glad Russia helped because it prevented Hillary.

by Anonymousreply 402July 27, 2018 1:34 AM

Ghouliani drowning on CNN, lol

by Anonymousreply 403July 27, 2018 1:35 AM

Lanny Davis says "I can't comment." Then he said, "But I have to wonder why the Trump people would put that out. It wasn't us."

by Anonymousreply 404July 27, 2018 1:35 AM

Is this Putin's way of taking out a weak asset?

by Anonymousreply 405July 27, 2018 1:36 AM

This is getting weirder and weirder by the second. Rachel Maddow just reported that Lanny Davis just released a statement saying that the leak that came out tonight was not from them, meaning neither Cohen nor Lanny leaked this.

Rachel is speculating that Trump?!? or his lawyers might have been the ones who released this info instead.

Huh?

by Anonymousreply 406July 27, 2018 1:37 AM

R399 Only the deplorables would believe Trump didn't know in the first place. He drafted the lies for Jr. to deny the meeting for collusion for goodness sake. The Trumps and their cronies have no conscience... they will lie a thousand times if you let them get away with it. Everyone in this administration and many of the GOP enablers needs to all go to jail for running this treasonous scam.

by Anonymousreply 407July 27, 2018 1:37 AM

So, is it fake news and disinformation leaked by Trump as pre-emptive discrediting of Cohen, or what?

by Anonymousreply 408July 27, 2018 1:38 AM

r402, I don't give a flying shit about what the deplorables think; if this is true, Trump may be in serious LEGAL trouble with Mueller.

Fuck the Deplorables.

by Anonymousreply 409July 27, 2018 1:38 AM

If Trump team leaked it then they know that Mueller already knew it, so Trump sends out the hound Ghouliani to bash Cohen's credibility

by Anonymousreply 410July 27, 2018 1:40 AM

I tend to think you’re right, R410, it’s going to be wall-to-wall “Cohen is a liar” attacks from the Trump team from now until his trial. And this takes away a serious bargaining chip Cohen had to offer in exchange for leniency.

by Anonymousreply 411July 27, 2018 1:44 AM

Then Cohen better flip already and stop pussy footing around or else he won't have any bargaining chips left.

by Anonymousreply 412July 27, 2018 1:46 AM

r412, the Law of Unintended Consequences.

by Anonymousreply 413July 27, 2018 1:47 AM

Everything comes back to Trump Tower... It's the Mount Doom of this deplorable epic.

by Anonymousreply 414July 27, 2018 1:48 AM

And Cohen's credibility, being questioned by RUDY?!?!? LMAO If it were anybody else....maybe...but Rudy???? LOLOL

Can I stop laughing yet?

by Anonymousreply 415July 27, 2018 1:48 AM

[quote] Good by Trump!!

[Quote] GAME OVER.

Somebody needs to take their lithium. These disclosures only happen like every two weeks.

by Anonymousreply 416July 27, 2018 1:48 AM

Cheeto is willing to sacrifice this because he knows the deplorables will fall into place, and Trumpster agents will carpet-bomb the MSM with outrageous claims that Cohen is not to be believed on anything.

Cohen better have something up his sleeve on the financial side, like shady or criminal deals, to give to the prosecutors. I bet Cheeto will leak anything but financial bad stuff.

by Anonymousreply 417July 27, 2018 1:49 AM

You would have thought that Cohen would have learned his lesson from Kathy Griffin.

Will Anderson flip as well? We know he likes to.

by Anonymousreply 418July 27, 2018 1:50 AM

When does Trump Tower get a name change?

by Anonymousreply 419July 27, 2018 1:50 AM

My dream is that it will one day become the world's largest sanctuary for refugees.

by Anonymousreply 420July 27, 2018 1:52 AM

Trump Guantanamo Bay?

by Anonymousreply 421July 27, 2018 1:53 AM

Don Jr. told Congressional committees that Cheeto had no idea about this meeting.

Junior is going down for at least lying to Congress -- if there is any justice in the world

by Anonymousreply 422July 27, 2018 1:53 AM

r407....remember....In Juniors emails from the time, they stated that Emins dad wanted to go to daddy and would contact Rhona, but that they should go through junior to deny culpability. You know damn well the two fathers talked and used the kids as plausible deniability. It will all come out.

by Anonymousreply 423July 27, 2018 1:53 AM

Still important that the Cohen news mention other people were present too when Cheeto was told of the meeting before hand - aka there are witnesses other than Michael Cohen, and Cohen can name them.

by Anonymousreply 424July 27, 2018 1:56 AM

Bwahahahaha......

by Anonymousreply 425July 27, 2018 1:56 AM

I hope Cohen has corroborative witnesses for his claim....

by Anonymousreply 426July 27, 2018 1:58 AM

Rudy claims he knows who the other witnesses are, R424, and they will not back up Cohen’s story.

by Anonymousreply 427July 27, 2018 1:59 AM

So R427, there is also the possibility this is a fake-out put out by Trump and Rudy. Which would be a bummer.

by Anonymousreply 428July 27, 2018 2:01 AM

R383: WHOOT!!! POW! THIS is getting Good! Go Cohen, Get the motherfucker!

by Anonymousreply 429July 27, 2018 2:01 AM

427 Dr Jr's witnesses are probably Manafort and Jared!

by Anonymousreply 430July 27, 2018 2:01 AM

The only thing I have is that if Drumpf and Ghouliani are putting this story out.... what story are they trying to cover up or deflect from that is way bigger? Because that's what they always do.

by Anonymousreply 431July 27, 2018 2:03 AM

R431, something to do with money and Trump companies.

by Anonymousreply 432July 27, 2018 2:04 AM

Or an abortion.

by Anonymousreply 433July 27, 2018 2:06 AM

R433 - nobody gives a shit about an abortion.

by Anonymousreply 434July 27, 2018 2:07 AM

Rumor has it that Jared will be indicted soon and that is why Ivanka closed/liquidated her fashion line...

by Anonymousreply 435July 27, 2018 2:09 AM

Still, the only way this story is not important is if it's false and Cohen wasn't present and can't confirm.

If the story is true, even if leaked, you betcha Mueller and Dem House and/or Senate committees will chase it to the end.

So roll up yo sleeves and work to elect Dem majorities!

by Anonymousreply 436July 27, 2018 2:10 AM

r427, and Rudy is the biggest fucking liar besides Trump himself.

by Anonymousreply 437July 27, 2018 2:10 AM

R434 Since when? Have the evangelicals gone full blown deplorable and started worshiping Trump instead of the other Lord and Savior?

by Anonymousreply 438July 27, 2018 2:10 AM

R438 what do you mean since when? Where have you been?

1) they're hypocrites and always have been and 2) they have fucking said Lord Jesus sent Drumpf down for them.

by Anonymousreply 439July 27, 2018 2:11 AM

[quote]Have the evangelicals gone full blown deplorable and started worshiping Trump instead of the other Lord and Savior?

Um, yes actually

by Anonymousreply 440July 27, 2018 2:11 AM

R435 Jared and Ivanka must be getting ready to flee the country.

by Anonymousreply 441July 27, 2018 2:12 AM

Someone clarify for me so is Cohen saying that it isn't true that he's ready to spill that info OR is he just saying he's the one that's leaked it?

by Anonymousreply 442July 27, 2018 2:12 AM

March 2018:

Jake Tapper: Do you think Donald Trump knew nothing about that [Trump Tower] meeting?

Sam Nunberg: "No. You know he knew about it. He was talking about it a week before...I don't know why he went around trying to hide it."

by Anonymousreply 443July 27, 2018 2:12 AM

R435 I'm curious as to why she would do that just because he'll be indicted?

by Anonymousreply 444July 27, 2018 2:13 AM

Looks like the wheels are coming off here, folks.

by Anonymousreply 445July 27, 2018 2:13 AM

I'm wondering if Cohen ALREADY gave this info to Mueller and that's why Drumpf and Ghouliani are trying to attack it. Could explain why they've been unhinged.

by Anonymousreply 446July 27, 2018 2:15 AM

When Lanny Davis goes before the cameras, Rudy will be no match.

And what Cohen knows, is not limited to the Junior meeting. Cohen knows most of the dirt, if not all of it

by Anonymousreply 447July 27, 2018 2:16 AM

This is just a distraction from the subpoena issued to the dump org CFO.

by Anonymousreply 448July 27, 2018 2:16 AM

R439 Then they will love it when their Lord Trump is "martyred" by the deep state.

by Anonymousreply 449July 27, 2018 2:17 AM

UHHH...remains of US military from North Korea after 65 years ain’t gonna distract from the big news tonight, sorry, Donnie.

by Anonymousreply 450July 27, 2018 2:17 AM

R444 - Because part of it involves shady finances and illegal stuff with her fashion business.

R448 - This is much more than a distraction.

by Anonymousreply 451July 27, 2018 2:17 AM

Bingo r446

by Anonymousreply 452July 27, 2018 2:17 AM

[quote]Sam Nunberg: "No. You know he knew about it. He was talking about it a week before...I don't know why he went around trying to hide it."

OMG I have missed this!

And we don't know what Hope Hicks has told Mueller.

by Anonymousreply 453July 27, 2018 2:17 AM

If Cohe had given the info to Mueller, Mueller would have barred him from talking about it or leaking it, R446.

by Anonymousreply 454July 27, 2018 2:18 AM

r448, not a very good one since that news has also been reported all day.

by Anonymousreply 455July 27, 2018 2:19 AM

R448 I think of it as more a double feature... double whammy... double penetration?

by Anonymousreply 456July 27, 2018 2:19 AM

Posted this on another thread. But what about Donnie Jr's ex wife? She was right there by his side during this time. What if she leaked it? Don Jr announced his engagement today! Nothing like a woman scorned.

by Anonymousreply 457July 27, 2018 2:20 AM

R454, currently the thinking is, it was not Cohen who talked or leaked it. It was Trump.

by Anonymousreply 458July 27, 2018 2:20 AM

Yeah, R454... and Cohen is denying he's the one that leaked it... So.............

Drumpf could have leaked it knowing that Cohen wasn't supposed to.

by Anonymousreply 459July 27, 2018 2:21 AM

Interesting, R458 and R459 ... I hadn’t thought of that angle. Could be!

by Anonymousreply 460July 27, 2018 2:23 AM

Bone Spurs will be tweeting big-time. Wake up hearing these tweets on Morning Joe.

Also, Sean Hannity had on Trump Junior tonight. He is sticking to his lies urged on by Hannity.

by Anonymousreply 461July 27, 2018 2:24 AM

Paul Manafort's notes he jotted down during that meeting:

Bill browder

Offshore — Cyprus

133m shares

Companies

Not invest — loan

Value in Cyprus as inter

Illici

Active sponsors of RNC

Browder hired Joanna Glover

Tied into Cheney

Russian adoption by American families

by Anonymousreply 462July 27, 2018 2:25 AM

Junior called a blocked cell number before agreeing to the meeting, right?

Any chances Mueller can't find out whose cell number this is?

by Anonymousreply 463July 27, 2018 2:30 AM

R463, when that was discussed earlier, it was assumed that Mueller knew who was behind the blocked number.

by Anonymousreply 464July 27, 2018 2:34 AM

In the morning, A. Dershowitz will be on CNN claiming Trump has unquestioned privilege, and this claim is unsubstantiated.

by Anonymousreply 465July 27, 2018 2:35 AM

Yes, R464, I'm sure Mueller has multiple ways to confirm Cheeto knew and approved of the meeting.

The panel on Lawrence O'Donnell's show are all, This is absolutely proof of collusion. The emails arranging the meeting explicitly say this is part of the Russian effort to help Trump. Trump approved of the meeting, aka conspired with the Russian effort to help him.

by Anonymousreply 466July 27, 2018 2:40 AM

Could someone please escort Trump out of the White House and keep him in custody before he presses the red button????

by Anonymousreply 467July 27, 2018 2:41 AM

They’re gonna try to confirm that justice in the haze of recent events.

If only two senators would do the right thing they could stall this until November.

by Anonymousreply 468July 27, 2018 2:42 AM

"This is absolutely proof of collusion."

So what? The people who are able to charge Trump were appointed by Trump - so he'll just get away with it. All of them should be apprehended, but there's nothing in the Constitution that covers this. Constitutional Crisis, anyone????

by Anonymousreply 469July 27, 2018 2:42 AM

The daily beast absolutely kills it in the graphics department.

Hats off.

by Anonymousreply 470July 27, 2018 2:44 AM

R469, it's more likely than not that Mueller /DOJ will follow the guidelines and not charge a sitting president. The only venue is impeachment. So-- it has been said time and again, the only remedy is to vote in Democratic majorities.

Even if there won't be enough votes in the Senate to convict in the beginning, maybe when a Dem House starts to hold real hearings and investigations, and the scandals grow, maybe this will create some momentum and pressure, and maybe the public will turn out to protest. Who knows. But even if the Senate is unable to vote in favor, just impeachment by the House will be definitely something.

We always come to the same conclusion, the only way out is to elect Dem Congress.

by Anonymousreply 471July 27, 2018 2:50 AM

[quote]Rudy claims he knows who the other witnesses are, [R424], and they will not back up Cohen’s story.

Uh, Rudy, if it didn't happen, how do you know who the other witnesses are?

by Anonymousreply 472July 27, 2018 2:53 AM

R471 I am sure you are correct. But meanwhile, Trump remains president and continues committing crimes, destroying our Democracy, and who the hell knows what else the amount of destruction he'll continue to cause. It's madness

by Anonymousreply 473July 27, 2018 2:54 AM

Yep, Collusion out in the open.

If the Repugs allow him to somehow get away with it, and his supporters end up ok with this, then they never again get to talk about patriotism, the flag or American values. At that point, we might as well just chunk the flag in the garbage and hoist up the flag of the Russian Federation.

by Anonymousreply 474July 27, 2018 2:55 AM

The family had a lot of buffers!!

by Anonymousreply 475July 27, 2018 2:55 AM

Again, let's move away from the word collusion because it isn't collusion.. it's conspiracy.

by Anonymousreply 476July 27, 2018 2:57 AM

As I listen to Lawrence O'Donnell, apparently there is some legal issue about this news leaking and it could impact Cohen's being a cooperating witness or something. If Cohen were the source it would not be good for him. That's why Lanny issued the denial. Because it impacts Cohen's status.

by Anonymousreply 477July 27, 2018 2:57 AM

OK - this is really out there! Perhaps Cohen came forward because he finally gave up on the idea that Trump would pardon him. BUT - maybe Lanny Davis convinced him that if he really did have enough evidence to convict Trump and show the entire POTUS election was completely invalid - and this is where my notion gets really nutty - the incoming Democratic President who replaces Trump will pardon Cohen.

Am I nuts?

by Anonymousreply 478July 27, 2018 2:58 AM

Shoot him, Wardell. Shoot him in the head.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 479July 27, 2018 2:59 AM

Collusion equals conspiracy to coordinate.

by Anonymousreply 480July 27, 2018 3:00 AM

[quote]Collusion equals conspiracy to coordinate.

No. You can have collusion without conspiracy. You cannot have conspiracy without collusion.

by Anonymousreply 481July 27, 2018 3:02 AM

Could it be that it’s not true, and Trump leaked it to purposefully make it appear that it was Cohen? And it would turn out to be untue? Therefore Cohen would look like the opportunistic liar?

by Anonymousreply 482July 27, 2018 3:02 AM

All the Dems need to do is mine this news and more to come for their Blue Wave. Get the House, investigate and stop Trump policies. Get both House and Senate, add on Impeachment.

by Anonymousreply 483July 27, 2018 3:03 AM

R471 is right. All roads lead to making sure we vote and elect a Democratic Congress. Without Trump self-immolating (or Republicans doing their damn duty) it is our only and best option.

by Anonymousreply 484July 27, 2018 3:05 AM

So, lets be clear, we have had at least 2 elections stolen from us, correct? 2000 and 2016. 2004 is VERY questionable as well.

If this doesn't result in all the treasonous asshats to be removed from office, then the Dems need to start stealing elections as well. Fire with fire. Start with Georgia. Abrams 90% to 10%. Make their jaws drop.

by Anonymousreply 485July 27, 2018 3:06 AM

Doesn’t this just prove Don Jr. lied to Congress and the FBI? Couldn’t he get decades?

Mueller, take his passport! At least, for now!

by Anonymousreply 486July 27, 2018 3:08 AM

r478, what Democratic incoming president? If Trump goes, then Pence becomes president, if Pence is unable to take the office, then it goes to the Speaker of the House and so on...

There are no Democrats anywhere near the line of succession and the next presidential election is two years away.

by Anonymousreply 487July 27, 2018 3:09 AM

R487 if Drumpf goes down so does Pence. He was the person in charge of the transition team and he lied about what he know.

If Drumpf goes down he's only going down if there's a Democratic controlled Congress and therefore yes, it would be a Democrat replacing it.

But that scenario about Cohen's attorney presenting that seems way too far fetched.

by Anonymousreply 488July 27, 2018 3:11 AM

If Cohen didn't leak it, and Trump's team didn't leak it, who in the WH did?

by Anonymousreply 489July 27, 2018 3:20 AM

R489 I'm gonna go with, "If Cohen didn't leak it... Drumpf's team did."

by Anonymousreply 490July 27, 2018 3:22 AM

America’s Mayor already announced his strategy to drop the evidence little by little as to deflate the findings before they all come out.

Not sure if that’s what’s going on here but it fits the playbook.

What else do you do when they have all the receipts?

by Anonymousreply 491July 27, 2018 3:26 AM

Why would they leak it? It is damaging. If its to hurt Cohen wouldn't that just encourage him to spill everything earlier?

And what if the leak is false? Is it just meant to damage Cohen's credibility? If he feels attacked like that wouldn't the net result still be that he will accelerate spilling the beans?

by Anonymousreply 492July 27, 2018 3:26 AM

If i were the Republican leadership, McConnell and others, I would have been thinking for months about the best time for Trump to go.

The worst time, is after Jan 20, 2019. If the Congress flips to Dem, with Pillosi as Speaker, he could be impeached. And, the Dems could find a reason to impeach Pence, too, leading to a Dem President.

The best time, might be to wait to see the midterm results. If they are bad, impeach quickly after the election, before the new Congress is seated. That makes Ryan President.

In any event, I bet they have a plan. A flexible one, depending on circumstances, but they have a plan with all the various contingencies.

by Anonymousreply 493July 27, 2018 3:28 AM

There had to be one day where Nixon finally said “the jig is up” but how does one know when that day has arrived?

by Anonymousreply 494July 27, 2018 3:28 AM

R492 Drumpf's team is not the brightest. They seem to just throw shit at the wall and see what sticks.

I do wonder if any of it is true and if Cohen DID go to the Mueller with it already. If so, then the question is how does Drumpf know about it?

The other question I would ask is with regard to people saying that Cohen does stuff like this in order to signal to Drumpf what he's willing to do... but then I wonder why would he have to do that? Certainly he has a back channel whether through various people or what have you.

The ONLY other thing I can think of is that maybe Drumpf and team are worried that Cohen WAS in a meeting and maybe he recorded it and maybe they are already in possession of it and they were trying to feel out if that was the case.

by Anonymousreply 495July 27, 2018 3:30 AM

I would love to see President Pelosi. It would cause all deplorables to simultaneously combust.

by Anonymousreply 496July 27, 2018 3:31 AM

R494, good question. Nixon’s Republican friends from his days as a congressman, they flat out told him that he had to go.

by Anonymousreply 497July 27, 2018 3:33 AM

@pdacosta · May 16

Don Jr. should be tried as an adult.

by Anonymousreply 498July 27, 2018 3:33 AM

There's no guarantee it would be Pelosi. I could see Democrats trying to go with someone else because unity historically isn't our strong suit.

by Anonymousreply 499July 27, 2018 3:33 AM

Guys...maybe it was you know who...

by Anonymousreply 500July 27, 2018 3:34 AM

Omarosa?

by Anonymousreply 501July 27, 2018 3:34 AM

[quote]The article also talks about how when it was discovered the only way to check Georgia's records to see if anything had been changed was to compare files to the backup files.... Georgia quickly wiped the hard drive with the back up files. Let that sink in.

OMG, she flipped Georgia too.

by Anonymousreply 502July 27, 2018 3:37 AM

Check out this chart on soybean prices. It’s really quite striking.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 503July 27, 2018 3:39 AM

[quote]this is for [R309], a tweet posted today by the wife of now identified "US Person #2" George O'Neill in the Maria Butina indictment

"So @NancyPelosi made a gangster like veiled threat to @Jim_Jordan about the #RosensteinImpeachment today-Will another member of his family conveniently die like the nephew? The #Baltimore Mafia only knows intimidation not true justice."

"@POTUS @Jim_Jordan I just got a weird call from #Baltimore asking for my medical info to discuss a “sensitive matter”- I’ve never been a patient at a #JohnsHopkins hospital facility It is now unsafe to return to my home in #Maryland because of my tweet ?"

She is so mug-cradlingly deplorable I briefly thought of creating a persona just to troll her until I remembered I'm not like that.

by Anonymousreply 504July 27, 2018 3:39 AM

[quote]That is never going to happen; they’ll never abandon him.

I know five Trump voters who have abandoned him since July 4th. And I don't know a lot of people who voted that way.

by Anonymousreply 505July 27, 2018 3:40 AM

[quote]Pennsylvania voters complained that the ES&S machines were changing or “flipping” votes.

I told a friend this the morning after election night.

The results in western Ohio were just too perfect for Trump, so much it gave me shivers and goosebumps.

by Anonymousreply 506July 27, 2018 3:41 AM

R504, Pelosi did not say or write that. And you should drop that “news” source.

by Anonymousreply 507July 27, 2018 3:42 AM

The guy who worked with Ken Starr said that collusion with Russia is not much of a crime. It's only a campaign violation. And if the Trumps didn't know it was a violation at the time of the meeting that it was a campaign violation -- because they are political neophytes -- then they are not guilty.

Manafort was not a political neophyte but the Trumps could always say he never told them it was a violation. This guy he doesn't think Mueller can prove it in court.

The guy also said that he doesn't think Mueller can prove obstruction of justice either.

I will be so pissed if, after all this, Mueller issues a report criticizing the Trumps, but no indictments.

by Anonymousreply 508July 27, 2018 3:42 AM

from r202 link

[quote]Twitter’s policy changes were meant to reduce the presence of white supremacists and other extremists on the platform. It remains unclear why Republicans were apparently being targeted while top Democrats weren’t affected, according to the Vice report.

It's not really that unclear, is it?

by Anonymousreply 509July 27, 2018 3:42 AM

[quote]The guy also said that he doesn't think Mueller can prove obstruction of justice either

No, he said that Cheeto's tweets by themselves won't prove obstruction. He was commenting on the news that Mueller was looking into the tweets. But he said they certainly go towards motive, state of mind, etc.. Which is important bc for obstruction of justice you need corrupt intent.

by Anonymousreply 510July 27, 2018 3:45 AM

[quote]Which is important bc for obstruction of justice you need corrupt intent.

Which again... don't they already have because you know, Dotard stated his intent in that interview?

by Anonymousreply 511July 27, 2018 3:52 AM

[quote]The guy who worked with Ken Starr said that collusion with Russia is not much of a crime. It's only a campaign violation. And if the Trumps didn't know it was a violation at the time of the meeting that it was a campaign violation -- because they are political neophytes -- then they are not guilty.

He said that all depends on what law is implicated as violated, and that if it's campaign law, it's apparently one of the few laws where there's an exception for not knowing the law (which doesn't exist in other laws). At least that's what I got from what he was saying. But he also added that there was at least one person there who wasn't new to politics and campaigns - Manafort.

This ignorance defense possibility is only significant if there are actual criminal charges. As it was discussed, Cheeto may not be indicted, and Mueller instead will deliver a report to Rosenstein / DOJ. It's up to Congress to do something with it, aka impeachment and there it's all political. Congress decides what high crimes and misdemeanors are.

by Anonymousreply 512July 27, 2018 3:52 AM

What if they are charged with accepting campaign funds from a foreign country -- is it just a misdemeanor?

by Anonymousreply 513July 27, 2018 3:55 AM

Remember how it went the last time: "It's not the crime, it's the cover-up."

by Anonymousreply 514July 27, 2018 3:57 AM

You'd have to be a half-dead lemur to not know that getting dirt from Russia during a Presidential campaign wasn't illegal. Even if you didn't know the specific statutes. And then all the actions after!

Do you really think Mueller is going to deliver a tepid slap on the wrist report?

by Anonymousreply 515July 27, 2018 3:57 AM

So if the thinking is that they won't indict a sitting false POTUS... well, his children can still be charged.

Not that I believe he'd care.

by Anonymousreply 516July 27, 2018 3:58 AM

I realize Trump hasn't released his tax returns, but does Mueller have access to them?

by Anonymousreply 517July 27, 2018 3:58 AM

I think Mueller has it ALL. More than anyone knows. Anytime there is a leak that is seismic, I bet he's known for months beforehand...

by Anonymousreply 518July 27, 2018 3:59 AM

Mueller has access to everything.

But I've never understood why anyone thinks Dotard's Returns are going to tell us anything.

by Anonymousreply 519July 27, 2018 4:01 AM

R515, the point is that Mueller may not want to bring criminal charges against a sitting president. What will be his report, we don't know.

I hope it will be damning and excoriating. But a report isn't a criminal indictment per se. If Mueller goes that way (report), it's up to Congress to go to impeachment or not.

by Anonymousreply 520July 27, 2018 4:01 AM

Remember Trump dictated the letter on Air Force One about how the meeting was about adoption. There’s got to be a crime in there somewhere.

by Anonymousreply 521July 27, 2018 4:01 AM

I would travel to DC to protest if Trump was not prosecuted. If enough people went on a congressional workday, it would move the congress.

by Anonymousreply 522July 27, 2018 4:04 AM

With the Cohen info out there, it's now virtually proven Don Jr. lied to Congress which is a crime. (Yes, we all know he lied, but lawyers need proof).

Charge Jr. with obstruction and lying to Congress, that's a start.

by Anonymousreply 523July 27, 2018 4:06 AM

Remember how the Starr investigation was a circus? Mueller has been stonefaced and serious as shit. I think his report will be severe and damning.

by Anonymousreply 524July 27, 2018 4:08 AM

[quote] So if the thinking is that they won't indict a sitting false POTUS... well, his children can still be charged.

He will pardon them the minute they are charged.

And for the person who constantly says someone has to be found guilty in order to be pardoned, for the 369th time,....no. You don't. You don't even have to be charged. Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon who was never charged with a crime.

by Anonymousreply 525July 27, 2018 4:10 AM

R525 he can pardon them for Federal crimes... not state crimes.

by Anonymousreply 526July 27, 2018 4:13 AM

And yes that is accurate. You don't have to be charged with a crime to be pardoned. I remember shortly after the election pundits were saying one way he could fuck with HRC would be to pardon her. That even if she didn't do anything wrong the pardon would give the APPEARANCE of having done something wrong and she'd never live it down.

by Anonymousreply 527July 27, 2018 4:14 AM

They aren't being investigated by any states. It's all federal.

by Anonymousreply 528July 27, 2018 4:15 AM

That you know of, R528. Mueller can easily turn over what he's found on them to the States.

by Anonymousreply 529July 27, 2018 4:16 AM

R527, that’s a risk, pardoning Hillary. She would refuse the pardon, and from there, who knows how people would react, or where it would go.

by Anonymousreply 530July 27, 2018 4:18 AM

R530 the point was that for the Deplorables it wouldn't matter. As long as he gave her a pardon it would fuck with her and they'd cheer. They would automatically think it meant guilt. The Pundits weren't saying he should or would actually do it.

by Anonymousreply 531July 27, 2018 4:20 AM

Ok, and my point is it could backfire. It might matter to the Deplorables after all.

by Anonymousreply 532July 27, 2018 4:25 AM

He can, but the state still has to do an investigation. If the state doesn't do its own investigation and just takes mueller' stuff, charges the person and find them guilty it can be overturned because the state didn't do its own investigation before charging someone with a crime.

And if Trumps children were charged in federal court and entered a plea before being pardoned, or if a jury is sworn in, they cannot be charged with the same crimes in the state of NY.

"New York’s statutory protections could result in the unintended and unjust consequence of insulating someone pardoned for serious federal crimes from subsequent prosecution for state crimes—even if that person was never tried or convicted in federal court, and never served a single day in federal prison.”

At issue is the question of when jeopardy “attaches,” or takes effect. That can happen when a defendant pleads to a crime, or when a jury is sworn in. A president could wait until a jury was sworn in or a plea entered, and then pardon them, and the former defendant could then cite the New York statute to prevent being tried in state court.

“Simply put, a defendant pardoned by the President for a serious federal crime could be freed from all accountability under federal and state criminal law, even though the President has no authority under the U.S. Constitution to pardon state crimes,” Schneiderman wrote."

by Anonymousreply 533July 27, 2018 4:27 AM

A few thoughts.....

What if both Trump and Cohen did not release this, hmmmmm? Could this be the IC finally going apeshit on him and deciding they’re willing to take him down in flames? Obviously if this came from the IC, whoever leaked will be caught and prosecuted strenuously, even though he/she is a fucking HERO.

Second....I had a weird flash while mulling it all over. I could DEFINITELY see Ivanka breaking. And even turning. I mean against her father (not Jared) because of her children. Do you really think she’s strong enough to keep going? I say she is not.

Other possible leakers include Trump Jr’s soon to be Ex, and/or.....MELANIE.

Last but not least, and this is a REAL wild card....what if Trump did indeed leak this, but didn’t do it in a fit of rage at Cohen, but instead is going kamikaze? What if he realizes he’s checkmated, and that his only hope of protecting his money is to get out of office and thereby (in his feeble mind) ending the investigation? Wouldn’t that be delicious too?

by Anonymousreply 534July 27, 2018 4:28 AM

There is someone you’re forgetting.

by Anonymousreply 535July 27, 2018 4:30 AM

So end game here- who will save us?

The IC? The CIA/FBI? Congress? The courts? Military?

by Anonymousreply 536July 27, 2018 4:31 AM

Putin???

by Anonymousreply 537July 27, 2018 4:32 AM

Where is the Khaleesi when you need her?

by Anonymousreply 538July 27, 2018 4:33 AM

Tom Arnold?

by Anonymousreply 539July 27, 2018 4:33 AM

Moby?

by Anonymousreply 540July 27, 2018 4:34 AM

Obviously the state would do its own investigation... and on one is saying they'd be charged with the same crimes Federally as they would with the State.

by Anonymousreply 541July 27, 2018 4:34 AM

Hannity!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 542July 27, 2018 4:35 AM

PSA. It's that hour for the trolls. Seriously check some of these posters history and question why they don't have any other history in these threads.

by Anonymousreply 543July 27, 2018 4:35 AM

R534 I would doubt the IC and especially Mueller would leak anything. Mueller doesn't leak.

by Anonymousreply 544July 27, 2018 4:36 AM

[quote]Then they will love it when their Lord Trump is "martyred" by the deep state.

Around their necks, all the little deplorable Evangelical princesses will wear gold crosses with Trump's tiny, bloated, twisted form portrayed crucified, wearing diapers.

He'll dance around on the end of a multitude of these filigreed chains for an eternity, as their mouthbreathing boyfriends preserve their holy virginity by fucking them in the ass.

Immortal.

by Anonymousreply 545July 27, 2018 4:36 AM

How do you check a poster's history?

by Anonymousreply 546July 27, 2018 4:36 AM

And....get this....a case is going to be heard before the SCOTUS that will affect NY state's attempt to close the double jeopardy loophole. The trump SCOTUS. Here is the lowdown

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 547July 27, 2018 4:37 AM

I never said MUELLER, I said maybe the IC. It is highly plausible that a rogue agent leaked, especially after all the insults of late.

by Anonymousreply 548July 27, 2018 4:40 AM

[quote] And if Trumps children were charged in federal court and entered a plea before being pardoned, or if a jury is sworn in, they cannot be charged with the same crimes in the state of NY.

Bullshit

by Anonymousreply 549July 27, 2018 4:40 AM

R546, Block the poster first. Then, go look at who you’ve ignored to see what they’ve posted. Then remember to unblock them.

by Anonymousreply 550July 27, 2018 4:40 AM

you know, there are credible sources out here. We know who they a re. So once you hear the "breaking news" and you see the analysis and reaction of some credible sources, walk away. Go outdoors. Get some fresh air. Read a book. But pace yourselves. Please. I was obsessed but I put the breaks on and I'm feeling so much better. We are in a 24/7 news cycle and it's not the same as it was even ten years ago. This is wearing on all of us. Everywhere you go you an see it in people. We have a long march ahead of us. We may not get every single thing we hope for. But we cannot afford to stop fighting. So pace yourselves and don't get anxious or upset because you hear someone talking shit.

by Anonymousreply 551July 27, 2018 4:41 AM

R550 Ahhh that is helpful. Thanks!

by Anonymousreply 552July 27, 2018 4:41 AM

R551 You’re not my mom!!

by Anonymousreply 553July 27, 2018 4:42 AM

R548 yes, but we're talking about whether Cohen has info to give to Mueller or if he already did. Only Mueller's team would know that and would most likely not be leaking that to any other IC. They know what they're dealing with, i.e. Ghouliani.

by Anonymousreply 554July 27, 2018 4:43 AM

You don’t know who the fuck knows what r554. It is possible IC knew too — how would you know what they do or don’t know?

by Anonymousreply 555July 27, 2018 4:45 AM

A story that leaked And pulled a tyrant downward — Upward soars my soul!

by Anonymousreply 556July 27, 2018 4:47 AM

Again bad formatting

A story that leaked

And pulled a tyrant downward —

Upward soars my soul!

by Anonymousreply 557July 27, 2018 4:48 AM

Why would Mueller's team share that info with anyone else knowing it could leak?

by Anonymousreply 558July 27, 2018 4:48 AM

“After 40 years as a Republican, Oregon elected official Lori Stegmann is now a Democrat.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 559July 27, 2018 4:49 AM

R558 are you dense????

by Anonymousreply 560July 27, 2018 4:49 AM

I don't buy the theory that the IC leaked it. Sounds completely too far fetched. Makes sense for Drumpf to have leaked it. It's what they do.

by Anonymousreply 561July 27, 2018 4:50 AM

No, R560 but you clearly seem to be... and angry to boot.

by Anonymousreply 562July 27, 2018 4:50 AM

Imagine if FDR, and the Dems, would've done the same after Pearl Harbor. This is all so mind-boggling.

We all tried to warn them before the election. Bone Spurs was not someone to be trusted. This was all so clear to us who had level heads.

by Anonymousreply 563July 27, 2018 4:50 AM

Yeah, Mueller and team has a history of this sort of thing.

by Anonymousreply 564July 27, 2018 4:52 AM

[quote] And if Trumps children were charged in federal court and entered a plea before being pardoned, or if a jury is sworn in, they cannot be charged with the same crimes in the state of NY.

[quote] Bullshit

Obviously you didn't read the rest of the post where Eric Schneiderman plainly explained the double jeopardy loophole in NY state. I suggest you go back and read it, because that loophole still hasn't been closed. Republicans in the NYS legislature are fighting it and there just aren't enough votes right now to kill it.

by Anonymousreply 565July 27, 2018 4:52 AM

He said he never

Knew nuthin’ about nuthin’

Double negatives

by Anonymousreply 566July 27, 2018 4:52 AM

My point, dear r558, is that it possible that someone other than Mueller who works for the government (maybe) leaked this. IC could have known this OUTSIDE of the Mueller investigation. We just don’t know. There are tons of spys a spookin’, perhaps IC knew this ALSO and one of them went rogue. Get it?

by Anonymousreply 567July 27, 2018 4:56 AM

What leak are you talking about? The Cohen testimony about the Russia meeting? Because a lot of people think that leak came from Trump. He's trying to deflate Muellers eventual report by leaking bits of it before it's released. That way, Trump's propagandists like Rudy can go out there and assure everyone that this is unimportant. The point is for them to do whatever they can to smear Cohen. It sounds about right to me. Trump does shit like this in order to loose an onslaught of propaganda from Fox and Trump's henchmen.

by Anonymousreply 568July 27, 2018 4:57 AM

Yeah we get it.. you don't seem to.

by Anonymousreply 569July 27, 2018 4:59 AM

R568, that just doesn’t make sense. Why would they leak something that could get Jr. in big trouble?

by Anonymousreply 570July 27, 2018 5:00 AM

I remember when Keram Malicki-Sánchez would have known.

by Anonymousreply 571July 27, 2018 5:00 AM

R570 because he does it all the time.

by Anonymousreply 572July 27, 2018 5:02 AM

And as Avenatti pointed out, crimes were committed in other states, like in CA. Doesn't have to be NY.

by Anonymousreply 573July 27, 2018 5:03 AM

Yes this is Trumps style to leak things, but no, it’s not his style to leak evidence of massive crimes.

by Anonymousreply 574July 27, 2018 5:08 AM

Because it’s going to come out anyway.

by Anonymousreply 575July 27, 2018 5:11 AM

I just want to point out that we have only 25 or so more posts left before this thread closes out. Has the OP started Part 40 yet?

by Anonymousreply 576July 27, 2018 5:11 AM

Own it r576! Don’t be timid about it!

by Anonymousreply 577July 27, 2018 5:13 AM

Trump Baby Balloons! Git yer Trump Baby Balloons right here!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 578July 27, 2018 5:14 AM

Jimmy Carter sold his fucking peanut farm so the USDA wouldn't be worried about regulating agriculture.

by Anonymousreply 579July 27, 2018 5:15 AM

Yes, R576. And we still have a few more to go before the new one gets linked.

by Anonymousreply 580July 27, 2018 5:16 AM

Yeah Trump totally doesn't have that history.

by Anonymousreply 581July 27, 2018 5:17 AM

Didn't Drumpf and Ghouliani "leak" something negative about Drumpf and try to make it look like Avenatti was the one that did it? Of course Avenatti had the receipts. #basta

by Anonymousreply 582July 27, 2018 5:25 AM

One of the reasons Guiliana says people shouldn't trust Cohen is because he "lies to people, to their face."

I mean, really.

by Anonymousreply 583July 27, 2018 5:25 AM

R583 that's actually pretty hysterical.

by Anonymousreply 584July 27, 2018 5:27 AM

Link to new thread for when this one maxes out.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 585July 27, 2018 5:28 AM

[quote] Yes this is Trumps style to leak things, but no, it’s not his style to leak evidence of massive crimes.

First, it's not a massive crime. It's a campaign violation that might be a misdemeanor, or might be a felony that could easily be pleaded down to a misdemeanor. When we talk about crime were talking about the law, not about our feeling toward the crime.

Second, Trump is a master at PR. That's how he got famous and stayed famous. He understands the 24 hour news cycle because he has exploited it for years. He understands the average person's attention span and how they only half listen to things. The Mueller report might contain a good number of bombshells. These bombshells, if released all at once, may overwhelm people to the point where they think "This is terrible! He must be guilty."

But if the bombshells are slowly leaked over a period of months, that dilutes their power to shock and allows your surrogates to go on tv and to write stories on the net that smear the person who the bombshell depends upon. Giuliani, Breitbart, Daily Caller, etc will spend days smearing Cohen and saying that people who get immunity will lie and make up crimes in order to save themselves. Facebook and Twitter will get bombarded with pro-Trump, anti-Cohen, anti Mueller messages

It's called "Getting in front of the story." So when Mueller releases his report, deplorables and the vast right wing media will say, "This is old news that was discredited." Because the bombshells are already out there and were propagandized for months, the impact is greatly diluted.

Trump is uneducated and incurious, but he is crafty. He learned from Roy Cohn, one of the world's most successful bitches, how to counterattack in order to really hurt someone. His ability to punch back knows no limits.

by Anonymousreply 586July 27, 2018 5:36 AM

Damn he just gets sexier.

[quote]I am not certain whether Mr. Mueller will ultimately indict Mr. Trump (although the evidence appears to be there). But this I do know - I am going to force him to “stand trial” one way or the other. The only question is how many jurors are we going to have... #Basta #FightClub

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 587July 27, 2018 5:42 AM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 588July 27, 2018 5:43 AM

Well I hope Avenatti can make three cases stick against Trump.

John Edwards never got convicted of anything for using campaign funds to hide his mistress and child. His jury was deadlocked and a mistrial was declared. The justice department decided "in the interest of justice" not to retry him. Yeah right, "justice."

by Anonymousreply 589July 27, 2018 5:57 AM

For all practical purposes, Edwards was driven from the political arena.

by Anonymousreply 590July 27, 2018 5:59 AM

[quote]It's a campaign violation that might be a misdemeanor, or might be a felony that could easily be pleaded down to a misdemeanor.

It's a conspiracy to defraud the people of the United States, in cooperation with a foreign power, with laundered money and vote tampering. I can't even enumerate how many laws they broke.

by Anonymousreply 591July 27, 2018 6:02 AM

Assuming Democrats win the House pf Representatives :

The best case scenario for Democrats would be for Trump/Pence to remain in power until Democrats take office in the House ( Jan. 3, 2019). Then, a Democratic Speaker of The House would be 3rd in line to the presidency.

by Anonymousreply 592July 27, 2018 6:11 AM

At this point, I hate red ties.

by Anonymousreply 593July 27, 2018 6:12 AM

Edwards got his mistress pregnant! How damn stupid can you get?

by Anonymousreply 594July 27, 2018 6:16 AM

r591 Add on the years of lying and obstruction of justice, and it's a big deal! The cover-up magnified a arguable "campaign violation" into downright treason. If they came clean early on and someone took the blame, then they might be able to obfuscate the collusion and get away with it.

by Anonymousreply 595July 27, 2018 6:18 AM

As mentioned above, take a note from history. It's not the crime it's the cover up.

by Anonymousreply 596July 27, 2018 6:20 AM

Link to new thread.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 597July 27, 2018 6:21 AM

Closing this

by Anonymousreply 598July 27, 2018 6:21 AM

thread out.

by Anonymousreply 599July 27, 2018 6:22 AM

Link to new thread below.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 600July 27, 2018 6:22 AM

The deplorables will never come around, ever. They get their talking points from fox or the certifiably insane alex jones. I have yet to meet one who does not become enraged when tr🐷mp is criticized. It’s weird and it runs the spectrum from the highly educated to west Virginians. Delicate, delicate ❄️, wholly invested in tr🐷mp emotionally.

On the other hand, they’re very, very easy to troll.

by Anonymousreply 601July 27, 2018 8:54 AM

GIULIANI: (Claiming that Cohen is a multiple liar)... it’s like we have to choose which lie from him to believe, lie number one, lie number two, lie number three...

by Anonymousreply 602July 27, 2018 11:28 AM

Link to new thread.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 603July 27, 2018 2:18 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!