What are all the stories about this iconic bisexual, Russian Ballet Dancer...Did Bobby Kennedy really blow his giant uncut cock in a phone booth? Did he fuck Jackie O.?
Where are you getting your fantastical stories from? From taking LSD?
by Anonymous | reply 1 | May 29, 2018 12:43 AM |
Why did he pose nude? Not that I’m complaining.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | May 29, 2018 12:44 AM |
Oh, my goodness--he's cut! And he's not American! There goes the theory that of all the men in all the world, only stupid Americans mutilate their baby sons.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | May 29, 2018 12:45 AM |
[quote]Oh, my goodness--he's cut!
Oh, my goodness -- you're blind!
by Anonymous | reply 5 | May 29, 2018 12:47 AM |
It must be hard to dance with three legs.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | May 29, 2018 12:47 AM |
[quote]Oh, my goodness--he's cut!
Is he? I was thinking Russian-dicked, a la Michael Lucas.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | May 29, 2018 12:52 AM |
Oh, my goodness, r5--you're a dumb cunt, parading as Babe Paley.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | May 29, 2018 12:52 AM |
Doesn't look like an aardvark dick to me. Where's the foreskin?
by Anonymous | reply 9 | May 29, 2018 12:53 AM |
R8 I'm trying to care about your opinion.
So far, nothing is working.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | May 29, 2018 12:55 AM |
[quote]Where's the foreskin?
Some of you are too stupid to live.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | May 29, 2018 12:56 AM |
r10, parading as someone who has more style than she, I'm not trying to care about yours, because you're wrong.
r11--are you the crackle fat from a grease fire? You're much more attractive that way.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | May 29, 2018 12:58 AM |
His skin is half covering his glans. He's fluffed a bit. Its possible he had mild phimosis.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | May 29, 2018 12:59 AM |
R12 Stop trying so hard. It is all quite beyond you.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | May 29, 2018 1:04 AM |
He is so obviously uncut.
Some of your old things haven't seen a real dick in decades.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | May 29, 2018 1:06 AM |
r15, I've seen a lot of uncut and cut dick in my time. I've seen a lot more foreskin than that. Maybe you've been with too many children.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | May 29, 2018 1:11 AM |
r14--that's all you have by way of response? Talk about being beyond one. Oh, dear.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | May 29, 2018 1:12 AM |
Now, that's a cock worth cheering for!
by Anonymous | reply 18 | May 29, 2018 1:14 AM |
R17 You are so out of your league. Do yourself -- and us -- a favor and stop.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | May 29, 2018 1:19 AM |
But you're not giving me any reason to suggest why I should, based on your tepid responses, r19.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | May 29, 2018 1:21 AM |
The only dick Bobby Kennedy ever sucked was mine!
by Anonymous | reply 21 | May 29, 2018 1:24 AM |
Stupid people are always the last to know that they are stupid people.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | May 29, 2018 1:26 AM |
I so agree, r22.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | May 29, 2018 1:27 AM |
Девушки! Эта тема о нашем любимом Рудольфе и его болезни, несущей пенис. Не твоя совесть.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | May 29, 2018 1:28 AM |
Google's crude translation of r24, for what it's worth:
Girls! This topic is about our beloved Rudolph and his illness bearing the penis. Not your conscience.
Okay, then.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | May 29, 2018 1:30 AM |
If that's an uncut dick, I've seen far more impressive foreskin than that. Apparently some of you haven't.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | May 29, 2018 1:32 AM |
Foreskin comes in many varieties. And also he is fluffed so the dick has already emerged from the skin.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | May 29, 2018 1:34 AM |
[quote]If that's an uncut dick, I've seen far more impressive foreskin than that.
That's isn't the criterion that makes a dick cut or uncut.
God, some of you are so exasperatingly obtuse.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | May 29, 2018 1:34 AM |
He is, obviously, semi-turgid, so the foreskin has peeled back.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | May 29, 2018 1:35 AM |
Semi-turgid. How charming. Well, it's a lovely dick.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | May 29, 2018 1:36 AM |
No, r28, but what we're talking about is personal foreskin experience. I know you have little, in this regard. Chin up.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | May 29, 2018 1:38 AM |
Tumid, please... As long as they're tumid, it doesn't matter if they're turgid!
by Anonymous | reply 32 | May 29, 2018 1:43 AM |
Let's see what scum posts.
Where are you getting your fantastical stories from? From taking LSD?
Oh, my goodness--he's cut! And he's not American! There goes the theory that of all the men in all the world, only stupid Americans mutilate their baby sons.
Oh, my goodness, r5--you're a dumb cunt, parading as Babe Paley.
Doesn't look like an aardvark dick to me. Where's the foreskin?
r10, parading as someone who has more style than she, I'm not trying to care about yours, because you're wrong.
r11--are you the crackle fat from a grease fire? You're much more attractive that way.
r15, I've seen a lot of uncut and cut dick in my time. I've seen a lot more foreskin than that. Maybe you've been with too many children.
r14--that's all you have by way of response? Talk about being beyond one. Oh, dear.
But you're not giving me any reason to suggest why I should, based on your tepid responses, r19.
I so agree, r22.
Google's crude translation of r24, for what it's worth:
Girls! This topic is about our beloved Rudolph and his illness bearing the penis. Not your conscience.
Okay, then.
If that's an uncut dick, I've seen far more impressive foreskin than that. Apparently some of you haven't.
Semi-turgid. How charming. Well, it's a lovely dick.
No, [R28], but what we're talking about is personal foreskin experience. I know you have little, in this regard. Chin up.
=============================
That smell here isn't smegma. It's rotten cunt doing a clot-shit on the DL.
And the foreskin is plainly visible, rolled up a bit.
Just another lonely lunatic thinking her $18/year gives her her own off-topic blog. Cut something and feel better. Start with the tongue.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | May 29, 2018 1:43 AM |
r33 is sadly unfucked--hasn't been fucked for decades and couldn't recognize a cut dick from an uncut dick. Dog dicks have been looking pretty good to r33, as he cruises the streets and is not above looking at canines' genitals, thinking he might have a chance there, if the owners' back are turned.
So much anger and insane hostility over a dead man's supposed foreskin. Unbelievably sad.
Let's light a candle for r33.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | May 29, 2018 1:49 AM |
R34 is a silly troll who has been outed.
Bless his heart.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | May 29, 2018 1:52 AM |
Again, r35, that's the best you have? Maybe it's time you go to bed.
by Anonymous | reply 36 | May 29, 2018 1:53 AM |
Nighty night, r35. Try not to shit the bed.
by Anonymous | reply 37 | May 29, 2018 1:57 AM |
This thread went off focus fast. The question was not about him being cut/uncut but about his sexual escapades.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | May 29, 2018 2:03 AM |
It's an interesting question, r38. The suggestion of RFK sucking him off in a phone booth and fucking Jackie--where does all that come from, exactly? Any evidence or supporting info?
by Anonymous | reply 39 | May 29, 2018 2:09 AM |
I have heard both rumors, for many years, on Datalounge. I don't know if I've heard them anywhere else.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | May 29, 2018 2:12 AM |
I'm sorry but who? Maybe explain that first?
by Anonymous | reply 41 | May 29, 2018 2:12 AM |
And here's more. Notice the Trumpian projections (the interest in canine penises is telling), and shabby tactics and the attempt at a grand entrance. Shit for brains inevitable translates into shit for speech and shit for spirit. And she types fat and substance abusing. Of course.
======================
r33 is sadly unfucked--hasn't been fucked for decades and couldn't recognize a cut dick from an uncut dick. Dog dicks have been looking pretty good to r33, as he cruises the streets and is not above looking at canines' genitals, thinking he might have a chance there, if the owners' back are turned.
So much anger and insane hostility over a dead man's supposed foreskin. Unbelievably sad.
Let's light a candle for r33.
Again, r35, that's the best you have? Maybe it's time you go to bed.
Nighty night, r35. Try not to shit the bed.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | May 29, 2018 2:18 AM |
Yes, r42, I said all those things--about sad old shitting-the-bed you. "Trumpian?" Oh, dear. Evidence, please?
"shabby tactics and the attempt at a grand entrance. Shit for brains inevitable translates into shit for speech and shit for spirit. And she types fat and substance abusing. Of course."
Oh my goodness, such a barrage of sadness. Sweetie. Go to bed. But do put on a diaper.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | May 29, 2018 2:24 AM |
Anyway, I had an older acquaintance who many, many years ago was working at a movie theater in a Midwest city. Nureyev and Fonteyn (I said it was a long time ago.) showed up at the box office. They were in town appearing in a theater across the street in one of their traveling productions and were killing time. She said they were very early and no one was around, so they spent time talking with her. His English wasn't so great at the time but she said both of them were mesmerizing and so attractive she was awestruck, although she was no ballet fan. They were relaxed, funny, polite and . She was surprised how short he was and said in his day clothes he looked very thin.
=================================
Not a big story, but more thread-focused than Miss Can't Shut Up here. The coward's usual game here, as is evident. It just keeps barking. Proud to be a bore and a pest:
Yes, [R42], I said all those things--about sad old shitting-the-bed you. "Trumpian?" Oh, dear. Evidence, please?
"shabby tactics and the attempt at a grand entrance. Shit for brains inevitable translates into shit for speech and shit for spirit. And she types fat and substance abusing. Of course."
Oh my goodness, such a barrage of sadness. Sweetie. Go to bed. But do put on a diaper.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | May 29, 2018 2:29 AM |
[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]
by Anonymous | reply 45 | May 29, 2018 2:31 AM |
Rudolf Nureyev's penis is intact. He has a foreskin in the photo, but his skin is somewhat retracted. He does not have phimosis; it's just that he could retract his skin and it stayed back, at least for the photo. Nureyev was not mutilated. He came into the world intact and left it the same way.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | May 29, 2018 2:32 AM |
Well, you're certainly a bore, r44. But thanks for your remembrance.
by Anonymous | reply 47 | May 29, 2018 2:33 AM |
I don't know beyond a thread where Matt stepped in, Have I seen one go off the rails so violently and quickly...
by Anonymous | reply 48 | May 29, 2018 2:36 AM |
And it continues, because that's what the sick trolls of the DL do. It can't stop. Yip yip yip yip brown little teeth:
Well, you're certainly a bore, [R44]. But thanks for your remembrance.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | May 29, 2018 2:36 AM |
Rudy's foreskin is retracted a bit; however, his skin is still covering the corona of the glans penis. He is not circumcised. Click on the photo, then click once again to enlarge the photo. Rest assured, Rudy's foreskin is clearly intact.
by Anonymous | reply 50 | May 29, 2018 2:37 AM |
Yes, Nureyev's foreskin intact. Nice bush too.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | May 29, 2018 2:40 AM |
r49 seems to think I don't own up to my comments on her silly posts, so she keeps reposting them. But I do.
This whole thing seems to stem from my issue that Nureyev was uncut. Who knew that would send the floodgates of r49's ire? Fascinating.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | May 29, 2018 2:41 AM |
"the sick trolls of the DL..."
--r49
by Anonymous | reply 53 | May 29, 2018 2:43 AM |
Wow, I had to block three different posters on this thread.
Holidays always bring out the trolls on DL.
by Anonymous | reply 54 | May 29, 2018 2:44 AM |
Yes, R48, and 21 posts from the same troll is what does it. Notice its next tactic, which is to pretend to being reasonable after attacking numerous posters who simply were trying to point out the (well-known) fact of Nureyev's being uncut. It's a particularly nasty troll who has yet to say anything at all about Nureyev.
Maybe it will stop the shit and blend in now. Because Nureyev can handle another thread. One can hope.
by Anonymous | reply 55 | May 29, 2018 2:48 AM |
Right. Only one troll on this thread. Ugh.
I always liked the photos of Rudy's apartments in NYC and Paris.
by Anonymous | reply 56 | May 29, 2018 2:52 AM |
r55: "Notice its next tactic"...note the use of its, like the person (me) posting isn't human.
Wow. That;s fucked up.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | May 29, 2018 2:54 AM |
Nice cock but what am I missing here? He looks like a lean, small framed, average looking guy.
by Anonymous | reply 58 | May 29, 2018 2:55 AM |
22 posts, I guess.
Yip yip yip yip yip yip, for sure.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | May 29, 2018 2:57 AM |
R57 he's actually being progressive and not assuming your gender.
by Anonymous | reply 60 | May 29, 2018 2:58 AM |
r60, no he's not.
by Anonymous | reply 62 | May 29, 2018 3:03 AM |
The story I heard was that he was kissing Bobby Kennedy in the phone booth, not sucking.
Also, I never heard anything about him being bi and I seriously doubt the Jackie Kennedy story. Total bottom, was the story I heard, and made the top do all the work.
Didn't Richard Avedon take the pic OP posted? Avedon was gay himself, it turns out, so you wonder if there was any action after (or before) the photo shoot.
by Anonymous | reply 63 | May 29, 2018 3:04 AM |
Crazy thread. Who knew the subject of cut/uncut dicks could create such bile?
by Anonymous | reply 64 | May 29, 2018 3:05 AM |
He seems like a narcissist, who didn't bathe before sex, like either punishing you with their scent or wanting to know you think they're sexy no matter what.
by Anonymous | reply 65 | May 29, 2018 3:07 AM |
"He," r65?
by Anonymous | reply 66 | May 29, 2018 3:08 AM |
R66 I don't understand the question? Was Rudolf Trans?
by Anonymous | reply 67 | May 29, 2018 3:13 AM |
R3 ...or once in 2015. Dead threads don't show up in thread search, Datalounge Records Keeper!
by Anonymous | reply 68 | May 29, 2018 3:15 AM |
"parading as someone who has more style than she, I'm not trying to care about yours, because you're wrong."
Um, that's your interpretation.
Do you think people who post as Mrs. Patsy Ramsey are parading around as someone more murderous than she?
What is your logic behind your statement?
by Anonymous | reply 69 | May 29, 2018 3:16 AM |
r56, I'm afraid it's not grand and fancy enough!
by Anonymous | reply 70 | May 29, 2018 3:18 AM |
R70 wonder how much shit was on the couches and rugs?! E. Coli central.
by Anonymous | reply 71 | May 29, 2018 3:19 AM |
He had a few rubles to spend on decor!
by Anonymous | reply 72 | May 29, 2018 3:36 AM |
And then it continued, shitting on you all with 25 posts.
Yip yip yip. Found its picture.
===============
r60, no he's not.
Crazy thread. Who knew the subject of cut/uncut dicks could create such bile? I did.
"He," r65?
by Anonymous | reply 73 | May 29, 2018 12:41 PM |
Oh, dear, r73. Really, that's the best you can do? So mean girl. And you're far too old to be a mean girl.
by Anonymous | reply 74 | May 29, 2018 12:43 PM |
Yip yip yip.
26.
The Copper Turd Award of the Day.
Proud, turd?
by Anonymous | reply 75 | May 29, 2018 12:47 PM |
Dear, such vitriol, r75. I'm sorry you're so unable to rise above your own nature.
by Anonymous | reply 76 | May 29, 2018 12:59 PM |
I once saw Rudolf and his dong in person. It swung down low, like in the picture, and did not look uncircumcised. But at the time, I'd only ever experienced two uncut cocks, and they were usually solid as a rock in my presence, so it's not like I was some kind of expert-texpert.
I didn't get close enough to smell it, something I have regretted ever since, for it was on offer, but I was late for a date, and saying I'd seen it seemed as good as saying I'd sucked it. Oh, fuck it. I was just too shy to reach out and grab it.
by Anonymous | reply 77 | May 29, 2018 1:14 PM |
Sweet piece.
by Anonymous | reply 78 | May 29, 2018 4:26 PM |
He was not bi. He was a Kinsey 5.9, who made an exception for Margot Fonteyn, and Margot only.
by Anonymous | reply 79 | May 29, 2018 4:56 PM |
R65, and he was.
by Anonymous | reply 80 | October 9, 2018 6:11 AM |
I started this thread years ago, I'm so proud!!!
by Anonymous | reply 81 | October 9, 2018 6:28 AM |
To confirm, Rudolf was uncut. In the splendid picture he's obviously thickening, which would ease the foreskin back naturally.
In addition, plenty of use tends to make the foreskin somehow fold under itself a bit, and remain only half-covering the glans at best. Probably Rudolf if he'd chosen to could have rolled the skin back behind his ridge where it would have tended to remain.
Not every uncut man has enough loose skin to cover his glans even when fully erect, but some do. Rudolf was uncut, but without an over-generous amount of foreskin, hence the picture.
by Anonymous | reply 82 | October 9, 2018 6:53 AM |
In this article, we read Nureyev was Tatar Muslim.
by Anonymous | reply 83 | October 9, 2018 7:09 AM |
In this article, we read under 7. Rites of Passage, "Circumcision and other rituals associated with birth, as well as those associated with death and marriage, and even certain Muslim dietary restrictions, are practiced by many Tatars today."
So maybe he wasn't uncut.
by Anonymous | reply 84 | October 9, 2018 7:09 AM |