R144, gay men and women can still procreate - not just by "traditional" means, as hets would, but throughout history many gay people have been forced to marry and yes, they had children. So no, a biological impulse and the ability to procreate doesn't elevate heterosexuality above anything else, because sexuality goes beyond mere reproduction. If that were the case, sex among human beings would be confined to very restrictive patterns, as it happens with most mammals. If recreational heterosexual sex is not conductive to reproduction, should be also present it as and "abnormality"?
However, your little display of homophobia made it clear: bisexual people are NOT gay, and they don't have a right to pollute the spaces we have fought so hard to build with our effort and suffering. if you don't want to be with the "freaks of nature" and are so proud of your reproductive abilities, go somewhere else. Also, do same sex impulses make bisexuals like you half freaks? Are you saying that bisexuality is a partial anomaly, or does that not fit well into your "straights and bis are better than faggots" little theory, and so you only condemn people who exclusively feel attracted to the same gender? Also, how do you explain animals who engage in same sex activity, either exclusively or periodically? Are they also "freaks of nature", or is that solely reserved to people who do not fit into your homophobic vision of the world?
Oh, and allow me to remind you that there isn't a human race - it's a species, separated into races. Maybe you could start from there, and try to build a theory as to why if society accepted bisexuality, the "gay and lesbian" problem would need to be addressed... Well, maybe because, in your opinion, we are "freaks"? LOL!
Finally, there are misogynistic men everywhere, and there are misandric women everywhere. I have heard heterosexual men refer to women as "holes", "cunts" and "bitches", and heterosexual women refer to men as "pigs", "a piece of dick" and "bastards". Does that mean that they don't have severe issues, or is it just that fags and dykes have them? Also, SOME gay men resent women because they stupidly see them as a competition, and there are groupuscules of gay men obsessed with hyper-masculinity who hate anything to do femininity, including effeminate gay men - does that mean that they have issues with women, or also with queens and twinks? Also, heterosexual men who feel disgusted at femmy gay men hate on women because they see femininity as being lower than maleness and thus, unworthy in a man, or is it just us faggots who are prejudiced against women?
Similar arguments could be used regarding lesbians and men - there are heterosexual and even bisexual (GASP!) women who are misandric, and that doesn't mean that they are necessarily defective or maladjusted or freaks.
However, allow me to remind you that there are many gay men who feel extremely comfortable and at ease among women and have (unbelievable, I know), lots of female friends, and there are lesbian women who feel at great ease with men and have lots of male friends.
In short, your arguments are poor, which is to be expected from YET ANOTHER bisexual bigot who thinks that his potential/partial heterosexuality places him above defective gay people. As I have said before, neither you nor any other bisexual person should be here. You are obviously not comfortable and allow me to let you in on a little secret: WE DON'T WANT YOU.
Go hang out with people who are the epitome of human development because they can reproduce (by the way, what happens with heterosexual people who don't want children or are sterile? Are they freaks as well?), and leave us alone.