Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Do you think "The Facts of Life" would''ve been very different had the other girls from season 1 stayed on?

I think Julie Piekarski, Felice Schacter, Molly Ringwald, and Julie Anne Haddock could've contributed so much to the series had their characters been kept on. I think about this a lot. Sue Ann could've joined forces with Blair to be a united foil for Jo. Jo could've bonded with fellow tomboy Cindy. Just so much wasted potential. I think about this a lot, as I suspect many people do. What do y'all think?

by Anonymousreply 89December 27, 2018 11:21 PM

No, they were removed because they were bland.

by Anonymousreply 1November 21, 2010 10:45 PM

Felice Schacter was the prettiest one and she *always* made Liza Whelchel look rather blah and dull when in scenes together. The entire 79-80 first season was pretty silly and I *still* don't buy that Cindy's inner-butch coming out was stopped by meeting boys at a dance. A prime time out baby-dyke woukld have been revolutionary 30 years ago.

by Anonymousreply 2November 21, 2010 10:51 PM

I think the show lost something when they pared down the cast-but then again, there were A LOT of characters to keep track of when the show started. I think they could have had the girls in recurring roles if nothing else.

by Anonymousreply 3November 21, 2010 10:51 PM

Schacter and Piekarski, maybe even Haddock, appeared in at least a couple of episodes during Jo's first season.

by Anonymousreply 4November 21, 2010 10:54 PM

You have to wonder how the writers and producers decided whom to can and whom to keep for the second season.

by Anonymousreply 5November 21, 2010 10:58 PM

I sometimes forget these shows were prime time since I use to watch them weekday mornings if I was home sick or if school was closed for some reason.

by Anonymousreply 6November 21, 2010 11:02 PM

I think they should of stayed recurring and appeared every so often for episodes that they needed them for continuity(tootie drinking,graduation from eastland, etc). After being fired as regulars they were demoted to being glorified extras in season 2 before being dumped all together! I mean it was a girls boarding school and Blair needed these other girls her age who weren't complete opposites of her (Nancy,Sueann)to interact with besides Jo.Ironically when they all came back (save molly) in season 6 they were all the hot ones compared to the trimmed down cast!

by Anonymousreply 7November 21, 2010 11:03 PM

The first season of the show flat out sucked.%0D That corny ass theme. Way too many characters and no attempt at chemistry.%0D %0D They did adress homophobia in an indirect way on one show, where Blair made veiled comments about the one girls butchness that bordered on anti-gay. Blair was quite the bitchy little fox that first year. She was even close to screwing some hot guy in one episode

by Anonymousreply 8November 21, 2010 11:10 PM

That first season had Helen Hunt,didn't it? Where worldly Blair went to split a bong with her until Tootie tagged along?

by Anonymousreply 9November 21, 2010 11:13 PM

"I think about this a lot." I'm so sorry to hear that.

by Anonymousreply 10November 21, 2010 11:14 PM

[quote]I think about this a lot.

OMG. I feel so sorry for you, OP.

by Anonymousreply 11November 21, 2010 11:14 PM

As bad as the first season of FOL was it wasn't nearly as bad as the first episode of One Day at A Time. Watch it some time if you can. Franklin played to the cheap seats in that one.

by Anonymousreply 12November 21, 2010 11:19 PM

The only thing sadder than OP thinking about this a lot is the fact that a cute little blonde girl had to go through childhood with the surname Haddock (in show biz, so everyone knew about it!).

by Anonymousreply 13November 21, 2010 11:25 PM

Felice Schachter was the first girl to get released and she had very little to do in that first season. She actually ended up getting more airtime than Piekarski and Haddock after they were all brought back to appear occasionally in season 2/3.

by Anonymousreply 14November 21, 2010 11:49 PM

[quote]As bad as the first season of FOL was it wasn't nearly as bad as the first episode of One Day at A Time. Watch it some time if you can. Franklin played to the cheap seats in that one.

Just the one, dear?

by Anonymousreply 15November 21, 2010 11:53 PM

Dammit, R14 and dammit R15!%0D %0D RE: FOL, keeping Natalie was a no-brainer.%0D %0D

by Anonymousreply 16November 22, 2010 4:53 PM

What's fun was that Natalie was a student at Westlake who caught casting's eye when the creators went there to look over a modern boarding school.

by Anonymousreply 17November 22, 2010 5:03 PM

Christ who cares? Where are you posting from OP? Your Mom's basement?

Fucking Facts of Life was a shit show, it sucked. The set looked like community theatre.

by Anonymousreply 18November 22, 2010 5:09 PM

I liked the Over Our Heads set.

by Anonymousreply 19November 22, 2010 5:56 PM

I say this as a fan --

The problem with TFOL is that it plays better in memory.

Once you see the cheesy reruns, you get put off until a few weeks pass and they again bloom in the fertilizer of nostalgia

by Anonymousreply 20November 22, 2010 6:28 PM

[quote] The problem with TFOL is that it plays better in memory.

I agree. I remember it fondly, but sometimes can't get through an episode.

They needed to tighten the show after that first season, but they sort of dumbed it down a little too much.

by Anonymousreply 21November 22, 2010 7:00 PM

Getting shafted from TFOL was the best thing ever to happen to future bratpacker Molly Ringwald! A few years later she actually made the cover of Time Magazine as Miss Teenage America!!

by Anonymousreply 22November 22, 2010 7:17 PM

Those season 1 girls were all terrible. I saved the show and everyone knows it.

by Anonymousreply 23January 18, 2014 4:29 AM

[quote] I think about this a lot.

I hope OP has gotten help since posting this a few years ago.

by Anonymousreply 24January 18, 2014 4:58 AM

[quote]I think about this a lot.

Was OP arrested and lobotomized since this post?

by Anonymousreply 25January 18, 2014 5:30 AM

I'm guessing it might have turned out a lot like Glee, minus the music and the boys.

by Anonymousreply 26January 18, 2014 5:52 AM

I think about season 1 a lot, too.

by Anonymousreply 27January 18, 2014 6:13 AM

It's a good thing Molly was let go, otherwise she might not have gone on to become that '80s icon we all know and love.

by Anonymousreply 28January 18, 2014 11:26 PM

OP -A revised opening credits of season 2,how it should of been!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 29April 8, 2014 5:47 AM

[quote] how it should of been!

Oh dear

by Anonymousreply 30April 8, 2014 5:52 AM

My two favorites were the blond, was it Julie? and Lisa and only because I knew them from the Mickey Mouse Club.

by Anonymousreply 31April 8, 2014 6:38 AM

[quote]The scripts were the problem: they weren't good enough for Diff'rent Strokes but they were too good for Hello, Larry.

Well, you take the good, you take the bad, you take them both, and then you have...

by Anonymousreply 32April 8, 2014 6:44 AM

My mother once commented that Charlotte Rae's singing ruined any show in which it was heard.

by Anonymousreply 33April 8, 2014 6:56 AM

R32 - I love that someone took the time to make such a thing!

by Anonymousreply 34April 8, 2014 3:43 PM

Are you the OP r37?

by Anonymousreply 35April 9, 2014 5:10 AM

What happened to Felice?

by Anonymousreply 36April 9, 2014 5:24 AM

Did anyone watch "Glee" tonight? Sam was watching "Facts of Life" and described it as "some red-haired lady runs a boarding school for lesbians..."

by Anonymousreply 37April 9, 2014 5:31 AM

I'm so glad I was canned!

Kisses,

Molly, America's Sweetheart xx

by Anonymousreply 38April 9, 2014 5:40 AM

R38, no I'm not the OP. I just find it fascinating that people are interested in the first-year Facts of Life girls.

by Anonymousreply 39April 9, 2014 5:43 PM

How would it have been different if it were set in an all boy boarding school?

by Anonymousreply 40April 9, 2014 5:47 PM

R43 - I think there was an episode where they attempted to make a spinoff featuring a military school for boys. Jo dated one of the boys, I think. Same shit, different gender.

by Anonymousreply 41April 9, 2014 5:54 PM

They should have replaced Charlotte Rae with Dorothy Loudon.

by Anonymousreply 42April 9, 2014 6:12 PM

[quote]Jo dated one of the boys, I think.

I think it's pretty obvious why that wouldn't have worked out.

by Anonymousreply 43April 9, 2014 6:15 PM

They should've done a mashup of Facts of Life and The Jeffersons. The girls could've volunteered at The Help Centah. Florence could've gotten sassy. Telling Blair to STFU. Taking food away from Natalie.

by Anonymousreply 44April 9, 2014 6:17 PM

Bump

by Anonymousreply 45April 10, 2014 8:59 PM

We're up to Season 5 in DVD releases. What's your favorite of the later versions of the show? Edna's Edibles? Over Our Heads? the Charlotte-free Cloris years?

by Anonymousreply 46April 11, 2014 12:47 AM

They should've added Ann B Davis to the cast.

by Anonymousreply 47April 11, 2014 1:53 AM

I know I'm the minority but I actually liked Cloris Leachman as Edna's sister.

by Anonymousreply 48April 11, 2014 1:59 AM

I thought Mackenzie was adorable. Don't worry--we were similar ages.

by Anonymousreply 49April 11, 2014 2:03 AM

8 girls plus Mrs. Garrett. It's just too many regulars for a sitcom. Yeah, The Brady Bunch did it, but if the show wasn't about a particular kid, they got like ten lines and sat at the dinner table or just lined up with the rest.

I admit I have a soft spot for the first season of FOL, but the show really did improve after the big cuts. Molly was so annoying, they morphed tomboy Cindy and Blair foil Sue Anne into Jo and Nancy was a bore.

I thought they should've kept Mr. Bradley on as an arch nemesis for Mrs. Garrett.

by Anonymousreply 50April 11, 2014 2:33 AM

Instead of wondering about OP's question, I wonder what Molly Ringwald's career would've been had she not passed on Pretty Woman or Ghost instead of doing shit like Betsy's Wedding

by Anonymousreply 51April 11, 2014 2:46 AM

Molly should glean satisfaction in the knowledge that Julia Roberts and Demi Moore have her to thank for their careers.

by Anonymousreply 52April 11, 2014 2:49 AM

Who cares about season one. That show meant nothing until Gerri Jewel appeared.

by Anonymousreply 53April 11, 2014 3:01 AM

Not quite R61

by Anonymousreply 54April 11, 2014 3:46 AM

[quote]They should have replaced Charlotte Rae with Dorothy Loudon.

Loudon preceded Charlotte Rae, in basically the same show, at the link.

Little known fact: when replacing Charlotte Rae, it came down to the wire between Leachman and Marion Ross.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 55April 11, 2014 4:02 AM

[quote]What's your favorite of the later versions of the show? Edna's Edibles? Over Our Heads? the Charlotte-free Cloris years?

Edna's Edibles. Almost all my favorite episodes come from those two seasons (Blair decks Moon Unit Zappa at the drive-in; they perform a kiddie Christmas show for prisoners; they have to fill 6 hours of dead air at the college radio station; Blair discovers her hot boyfriend is a stripper; Cruisin'!, etc.).

by Anonymousreply 56April 13, 2014 5:55 PM

Was the OP including me in the thread title?

by Anonymousreply 57April 13, 2014 8:00 PM

No one rocked a collar-length tight perm quite the way Miss Mahoney did.

by Anonymousreply 58April 13, 2014 8:02 PM

Very different and also very quickly cancelled. In fact, the network probably made them purge the cast as a condition for renewal.

by Anonymousreply 59April 13, 2014 8:17 PM

Wasn't there a deleted scene from the first episode where Miss Mahoney puts the moves on a questioning Cindy?

by Anonymousreply 60April 13, 2014 8:18 PM

No r68, give me some credit. I put the moved on a tipsy SueAnn.

by Anonymousreply 61April 13, 2014 8:33 PM

I wonder what would've happened on Charles in Charge had they kept the Pembrokes instead of bringing in the Powells. Never cared for the cast changes.

by Anonymousreply 62April 13, 2014 8:33 PM

I personally think yes-it would have been a lot different!

by Anonymousreply 63April 13, 2014 8:34 PM

The first episode of Season 1 had the best joke. Miss Mahoney admits that she's 32 and goes on a spiel that it's the age when a woman is in her prime, yadda yadda yadda.

[quote]MISS MAHONEY: it's not as far away as you may think. Some of you are about to burgeon into womanhood.

[quote]NATALIE: I thought all of us were virgins?

XD

by Anonymousreply 64April 13, 2014 8:45 PM

Alternate opening credits 2

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 65April 14, 2014 12:15 AM

It's fascinating in its weirdness, R73. The regular girls only get to appear in that final scene, no credits for them!

I want to see a fan made opening with the group that would have been at Eastland had it continued with Blair as Headmistress - Juliette Lewis was one of them, Seth Green, Mayim Bialik, etc.

by Anonymousreply 66April 14, 2014 12:21 AM

The Lost Girls - about the changes.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 67April 14, 2014 12:22 AM

It would've been better, they would've had Cindy and Jo become a couple.

by Anonymousreply 68February 7, 2017 11:51 AM

It would've been better if they made the lost girls enemies to the regular girls.

by Anonymousreply 69February 23, 2018 8:57 AM

[quote]R5 You have to wonder how the writers and producers decided whom to can and whom to keep for the second season.

It's called STAR QUALITY!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 70February 23, 2018 11:40 AM

That must have been so awkward when the girls were brought back for a few episodes after they were cut and the show had become a huge hit. I wonder if they were shunned by the survivors. I can see Mindy Cohn being a cunt.

by Anonymousreply 71February 23, 2018 12:13 PM

Why didn't they keep hot daddy Mr Bradley?

by Anonymousreply 72February 23, 2018 12:33 PM

Because he wasn't hot.

by Anonymousreply 73February 23, 2018 2:02 PM

r73 = baby dyke Cindy

by Anonymousreply 74February 23, 2018 2:06 PM

Felice Schacter took it the hardest, Apparently her agents told her the show would be centered around her character. If it were up to me I would have cut Kim Fields.

by Anonymousreply 75December 27, 2018 9:12 PM

^Of course

by Anonymousreply 76December 27, 2018 10:18 PM

Before there was Vixen on Legends of Tomorrow, we had Julie Ann Haddock as The Girl From Ilandia!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 77December 27, 2018 10:20 PM

“Nowadays she enjoys being with her family and in church.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 78December 27, 2018 10:23 PM

Old Blair and Sue Ann

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 79December 27, 2018 10:27 PM

I’m wet.

by Anonymousreply 80December 27, 2018 11:05 PM

Julie Piekarski's lips are too thin for that dark shade of red. Doesn't look good.

by Anonymousreply 81December 27, 2018 11:21 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!