Serving up this steaming pile of
Celebrity Gossip
Gay Politics
Gay News
and Pointless Bitchery
Since 1995

If Sharon Tate had lived

would she have beat me for an Oscar too?

by Mreply 6901/27/2015

Charlie Manson could beat you for an Oscar.

by Mreply 105/19/2010

I believe if Sharon Tate had lived, she would have become a better actress. I really do.

by Mreply 205/20/2010

R2, I do, too. The experience of sharing a life with Roman Polanski and his world would have led to such great things for her. (I know, Mary!). Plus, we may well have been spared the hysteria over his dalliances in the 70s.

by Mreply 305/20/2010

Not unless she she had survived the attack and clawed her way back. The Academy loves that triumph over personal struggle shit and issues awards willy-nilly for it.

Oh, or if she had portrayed a famous person and gotten the look and the voice just right. Bonus points if any signing is involved. The Academy REALLY laps that up.

by Mreply 405/20/2010

Glenn darling, you really should leave the Oscar discussions to those who know what they are talking about.

by Mreply 505/20/2010

Hell, Pee Wee Herman and Pamela Anderson are better actors.

by Mreply 605/20/2010

since we haven't really seen enough of Miss Tate's work when alive to know what she could or could not have done, there's no way of knowing.

by Mreply 705/20/2010

She was a terrible actress. No depth, no range. Talent does not "rub off" just by being near it, either. She might have gotten better but she was known for being beautiful and nice, not for being a gifted actress. So, I would guess that she would not have gotten any closer to an Oscar than attending the show.

by Mreply 805/20/2010

r7, please. There is ample evidence of her work out there to see where she was "artistically" at the time of her demise. Girl needed a near death experience to gain some depth and..well, you see how THAT turned out.

No matter what gets said, she was pretty much universally known for being nice and beautiful and sweet, qualities that made her an anomaly in Hollywood and makes it especially horrific for the way her short life ended.

For Sharon, the jokes stop short with regard to the Manson invasion. Eternally shocking, sad and terribly frightful. Bless her and all those who suffered at the hands of those crazy, evil people.

Sharon Tate need never have WON an "Oscar" to be in the national zeitgeist/conciousness. Manson pretty much sealed her fate in that regard.

by Mreply 905/20/2010

No she wasn't a classically trained artiste of the highest caliber like myself.

by Mreply 1005/20/2010

Who knows? She would have taken some time off to have her baby. Then again, Sharon would have waited years and years to come out and do another film. That's if she had never been murdered by the Manson people.

by Mreply 1105/20/2010

I don't recall you ever licking your lips to illustrate depth and craziness, Helen.

by Mreply 1205/20/2010

[quote] She was a terrible actress. No depth, no range. Talent does not "rub off" just by being near it, either. She might have gotten better but she was known for being beautiful and nice, not for being a gifted actress.

Don't you hate when that happens?

by Mreply 1305/20/2010

If Sandra could beat you, Pia Zadora and Sharon Tate could too, M.

Truth hurts, doesn't it.

by Mreply 1405/20/2010

"She was a terrible actress. No depth, no range. "


by Mreply 1505/20/2010

If Sharon Tate had lived... Roman Polanski would never have raped that girl.

by Mreply 1605/20/2010

Of course he would have! Sharon would have been much too old for him by then.

by Mreply 1705/20/2010

If Sharon Tate were alive today, right now she would be clawing frantically at the inside of her coffin.

by Mreply 1805/20/2010

SHaron Tate would have been Hollywood's hottest sex symbols. She has a natral beauty and Raquel Welch could not even measure up to Sharon's standards. WHile Sharon has the natural look in face and body Raquel has to spen $$$$$$$ for plastic surgery and other corrective procedures to make her look like a "sex symbol". In addition Sharon did not appear to be narcisssistic.

by Mreply 1902/24/2011

She has less acting talent than Farrah Fawcett

by Mreply 2002/24/2011

She was the next Marilyn. Well, she shared that honor with Julie Christie.

by Mreply 2102/24/2011

Sharon would be long forgotten if not for the tradegy that befell her and Roman would never have been a good husband or father.

by Mreply 2202/24/2011

Those couples makes the best looking sons: tall, gorgeous mothers and homely-cute fathers.

by Mreply 2302/24/2011

I honestly believe that Roman Polanski was involved in her murder. He gave a good performance when he cried during the press conference to talk about the murders, though. Also, my guess is that the baby was not his.

by Mreply 2402/24/2011

I think Sharon would have put her career on hold and devoted herself to her son. By the late 70s Polanski would have divorced her and given her a nice settlement. She would have reappeared on TV in the late 1980s as a curiosity.

by Mreply 2502/24/2011

She was a horrible actress.

by Mreply 2602/24/2011

Is 'The Fearless Vampire Killers' any good? I find the cover to be creepy:

by Mreply 2702/24/2011

This is so cute!!!

by Mreply 2802/24/2011

She was probably very naive.

by Mreply 2902/24/2011

Sharon Tate was a ham!!!

by Mreply 3002/24/2011

"I can't see myself doing Shakespeare... I would LOVE to do light comedy."

It's a shame that when people think of the Bard, they think of heavy revenge drama with dense dialogue. He wrote some of the funniest plays ever. Obviously, Sharon had never heard of Rosalind in As you Like It.

by Mreply 3102/25/2011


by Mreply 3202/25/2011

Little did Sharon know that the event of her death would be akin to Macbeth or Hamlet.

by Mreply 3302/25/2011

She would have got the part of Abby in Knots Landing instead of Donna Mills

by Mreply 3406/15/2013

She was, in fact, a very good actress who could do both comedy and serious roles. I think people can only remember her as beautiful, but she was in fact a gifted actress.

by Mreply 3510/04/2013

[all posts by tedious, racist idiot removed.]

by Mreply 3610/04/2013

Agree with r46. Or she could have been one of the original Charlie's Angels. Would have easily bested Farrah as the national poster pin up.

by Mreply 3710/04/2013

She was a TERRIBLE actress! I knew the minute I saw her in "The Beverly Hillbillies" that something needed to be done.

by Mreply 3810/04/2013

While some of her performances clearly show her lack of experience, I believe she was on her way to becoming quite a good actress. (Sure, she's terrible in VALLEY OF THE DOLLS but then everyone in that film is, with the exception of Hel - sorry, Susan Hayward.) Her 'debut' performance in the gothic horror EYE OF THE DEVIL is mesmerizing: her (allegedly dubbed) voice makes her sound stiff and clumsy, yet she has undeniable presence, beyond her striking beauty.

She was fine, if not particularly memorable, in THE FEARLESS VAMPIRE KILLERS but her last movies earned her good reviews: she definitely showed a flair for comedy in THE WRECKING CREW (an amusing spoof on James Bond starring Dean Martin) and in her very last film 12+1. Had she lived, she might have become quite a gifted comic actress, in the vein of a modern times Marilyn.

by Mreply 3910/04/2013

So freaky to think Tate would be 70 YEARS OLD today - same age as Linda Evans, Stephanie Powers, Holland Taylor, Blythe Danner, Sharon Gless, Judge Judy - you get the idea.

Her child would be .....44

That beautiful face, and body, would long be gone

by Mreply 4010/04/2013

[all posts by tedious, racist idiot removed.]

by Mreply 4110/04/2013

It wouldn't be gone, r40. It would be preserved in plastic and botox, just like the rest of them.

by Mreply 4210/04/2013

She'd be the center square for the win.

by Mreply 4310/04/2013

She'd be in Paris making nudies! NUDIES!

by Mreply 4410/04/2013


I understand from Anjelica that Charlie passed you by because you weren't --- worth killing.

And it's very funny that you, of all people, would tell me that anyone could beat me for an Oscar. Among the six of us who have beat you to date, Linda Hunt did it playing a male dwarf.

I guess you should have walked around on your knees in NOBBS - God knows you've had practice.

Come over some time. I've just opened my third awards room in the cottage. It's starting to look like the trophy wing at Notre Dame around here!

by Mreply 4510/04/2013

OP, please die.

by Mreply 4610/04/2013

If Sharon had lived, she would have done movies like The Last of Sheila (Raquel's part) or Shampoo or Heaven Can Wait.

by Mreply 4710/04/2013


by Mreply 4810/04/2013

Tony, why does Miriam not like ME?

Tony, WHY does Miriam not LIKE me?

Tony, why DOES Miriam not like me?

Tony, why does....oh fuck it. Let's shoot the scene.

by Mreply 4910/04/2013

[quote]You can't judge Sharon's talent by Valley of the Dolls. That script and the director were just hopeless, the most talented actress in the world would have sucked in it.

So true. They had to have realized at some point how bad it was. I'm reminded of Dyan Cannon who at the premiere of The Love Machine--an even worse Susann adaptation--was laughing so loudly at her own performance, she had to leave the theatre.

Parkins came off best in Valley. Remember, she was only known for playing the town tramp in Peyton Place on TV. So playing a virgin was definitely a change of pace for her.

But, IMO, only Parkins and Tate came across as human. Hayward and Duke were just ridiculous, due to the script and direction.

by Mreply 5010/04/2013

What about me ? I just took a dump in my dressing room wastebasket, and stole my sequined pantsuit to wear at my concerts. Who's the loser now?

by Mreply 5110/04/2013

Here are the actresses who beat Meryl

Maggie Smith

Katharine Hepburn

Shirley MacLaine

Geraldine Page


Jodie Foster

Kathy Bates

Susan Sarandon

Gwyneth Paltrow

Catherine Zeta Jones

Hilary Swank

Helen Mirren

Kate Winslet

Sandra Bullock

by Mreply 5210/04/2013

OMG, R40, what you have done is unforgiveable. You have begun the self-destruct sequence for the end of the universe.

by Mreply 5310/04/2013

R53 Why ???

by Mreply 5410/04/2013

[all posts by tedious, racist idiot removed.]

by Mreply 5510/04/2013

She'd be dragging her tits along the sidewalk.

by Mreply 5610/05/2013

Honestly, I believe that Rosemary LaBianca had a better shot at Oscar gold than Sharon.

by Mreply 5710/05/2013

[all posts by tedious, racist idiot removed.]

by Mreply 5810/05/2013

Very few women hold up as well as , say, Raquel, who's 73. If you've ever seen a pic of Tate's mother ( who, granted was a great crusader for victims rights), you'll see what was Sharon's future, physically. Very large woman, with a double chin. The reality is, Tate could easily have been a great grandmother by now, most likely long divorced from Polansky, and probably long retired from acting too, after marrying a movie, or TV executive. Wasn't she discovered by, and the mistress of, producer Martin Ransohoff ?

by Mreply 5910/05/2013

She was a horrible actress. Had she lived, she would've been as relevant as Kate Capshaw and Rita Wilson.

by Mreply 6010/05/2013

She had a mannequin quality about her- beautiful but stiff and fragile. A wispy demeanor and a weak voice.

She probably would have done a few more big screen movies. Then some TV work between babies and marriages. But I put her in the category of Alana Stewart and Peggy Lipton: Hollywood Wives.

If she only knew how famous she was going to be..

by Mreply 6110/07/2013

R58 Cannon's role was loosely based on socialite Babe Paley, so Dyan was out of her element a bit.

I'm convinced The Love Machine was the causes of the Susann-Truman Capote feud. Capote was very close to Babe Paley (until their famous falling- out) and he must have deeply resented Susann portraying Babe as an adultereress.

by Mreply 6210/07/2013

I love Dyan Cannon in " The Last Of Sheila". Nothing like Sue Mengers (who she was based on), but did that role well, and looked great.

by Mreply 6310/07/2013

A beauty but horrible as an actor thrust to VOTD by her perv husband, no talent, watch her performance in it , tinny, thin, the only quality is her constantly shedding her pajamas by the pool to expose her body, yes a true vixen , who knows maybe with time and direction she could of maybe became somewhat of an actress , many after her have achieved that, oh well rip st.

by Mreply 6412/01/2014

Sharon Tate would have been a gigantic movie star in the 1970s, with a career rivaling Jane Fonda's and Faye Dunaway's. She was a breathtaking women, she oozed star power and was a marvelous actress. Her scenes in "Valley of the Dolls" are so touching. Additionally, she had the gift of comedy when she spoke of her bust exercises in Valley of the Dolls. "To hell with them, let 'em droop!" I think, had that lovely lady lived, she would have been one of the finest actresses to grace the screen in the 1970s and 1980s. It's so sad.

by Mreply 6512/01/2014

She might have been Ali McGraw.

by Mreply 6612/01/2014

It happened to Ann "Kitten With A Whip" Margaret. Two Oscar noms, Carnal Knowledge and Tommy.

by Mreply 6712/01/2014

She would be old, ugly, fat and broke.

by Mreply 6801/27/2015

I've often wondered, if they'd have lived, would Jay Sebring still be her stylist?

by Mreply 6901/27/2015
Need more help? Click Here.

Follow theDL catch up on what you missed

recent threads by topic delivered to your email

follow popular threads on twitter

follow us on facebook

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!