He can't be that dumb...
Mike Johnson’s Alleged Grindr Messages LEAK... And They Are SPICY
by Anonymous | reply 37 | October 8, 2025 9:59 PM |
I think he is that dumb, but unless you can tie the grindr account directly to his personal email or other personal information, then the picture he allegedly shared isn’t a smoking gun. It’s easy enough for him and MAGA to claim it’s an evil Deep State plot. You need others to come forward with receipts. And besides, we need to go after Miller and Vought. Dig up their grindr profiles.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | October 7, 2025 11:12 AM |
The person making the claim stated the Grindr conversation happened in 2023. The picture of Johnson that the person claimed was used with the profile was found to have been taken in 2025, so entire thing is debunked. However, in the YouTube video, the fitness guy and the other guy just choose to ignore that. Politifact went on to show how to create such a fake Grindr conversation.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | October 7, 2025 11:29 AM |
this is why they hate us, sad queen in question, needs psych meds?
by Anonymous | reply 3 | October 7, 2025 11:54 AM |
He looks so gay.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | October 7, 2025 12:12 PM |
Where there's smoke, there's fire.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | October 7, 2025 12:38 PM |
If a politician is on Grindr, they would not use aphorism of themselves with their congressional pen. Further, they’d use an expiring photo.
This is almost insultingly bad.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | October 7, 2025 12:41 PM |
I'm certain Miss Lindsey schooled him on discretion, along with the popular GOP Russian masseur Pavel who still works out of Moscow but has an Einstein visa to be in DC.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | October 7, 2025 1:31 PM |
He’s a closet case
by Anonymous | reply 8 | October 7, 2025 3:13 PM |
R1 you have good points. However, someone who works behind the tech scenes at Grindr would certainly know how to retrieve this info (if it is in fact real). And if it's not real, then who cares? The RWNJ media and current administration lie about everything and put out false videos, so go ye forth and pump false shit everywhere onto the internet. A strategy I'm not seeing that I'd like to: people planting suggestions or suspicions that certain individuals close to Trump are actually plotting to make him appear fragile or untethered so they can take over (Vance is a likely candidate for that, and Trump would 100 % believe it too. He's reached that level of paranoia.)
by Anonymous | reply 9 | October 7, 2025 3:48 PM |
It sure would be nice to bring Johnson down, but if we still care about truth in this seemingly post-truth world, this one's bullshit... as R2 explains.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | October 7, 2025 3:53 PM |
"but if we still care about truth in this seemingly post-truth world,"
And why should we? Republicans/MAGAts/pathological liar Trump haven't cared about it for decades. Why should we?
by Anonymous | reply 11 | October 7, 2025 3:58 PM |
R11 OK, it's true then!
Now what?
by Anonymous | reply 12 | October 7, 2025 4:02 PM |
Johnson and Lady Lindzebelle would both be obsessive bottoms. They might try 69ing or scissoring, but doubtful that would reach the level of satisfaction that each seek.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | October 7, 2025 4:21 PM |
OP, didn't you see even one of the elebenty-fiddy-fide threads on this exact topic?
by Anonymous | reply 14 | October 7, 2025 4:28 PM |
"OK, it's true then!
Now what?"
Repeat the lie ad nauseum, just like the Nazis/Trump/MAGAts/Republicans do. Eventually you will get enough idiots to believe you. This is America, after all, home of the brave and the stupid.
Eventually, Miss Lindseybelle and Miss Johnson will be the Rock Hudson/Jim Nabors of the 21st century.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | October 7, 2025 4:44 PM |
[quote] Eventually, Miss Lindseybelle and Miss Johnson will be the Rock Hudson/Jim Nabors of the 21st century
No one cared then, and no one will care now.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | October 7, 2025 5:06 PM |
"No one cared then..."
And you know this how? I seem to remember quite a bit of interest in this rumor when I first heard it back in 1969.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | October 7, 2025 5:39 PM |
So, this is it. There was a guy here swearing last Wednesday that this wasn’t the leak.
It’s been said why this is obviously fake above. He wouldn’t use a work pic, he’d use an expiring photo, the first photo would be from the neck down, he’d be more discreet because not this stupid, etc…
That guy who is “lawyering up” is obviously mental and dumb. He tried to blackmail the speaker of the house and *this* is what he had. Bizarre. I almost can’t believe that Rosie O’Donnell is backing that guy.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | October 7, 2025 5:47 PM |
I can't believe anyone fell for this. Once I saw the photo he allegedly sent I laughed out loud.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | October 7, 2025 6:08 PM |
Oh, please.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | October 7, 2025 6:10 PM |
R17- You remember a gay rumor from 1969?
You really are an ELDER gay.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | October 7, 2025 7:10 PM |
MSNBC confirms that they’re fake.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | October 7, 2025 7:11 PM |
Oopsie
by Anonymous | reply 24 | October 7, 2025 7:31 PM |
I can't imagine Mike Johnson producing anything spicy.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | October 7, 2025 7:34 PM |
[quote]this is why they hate us, sad queen in question, needs psych meds?
I haven't checked it out, but I heard online that the guy on TikTok had indicated he was having some kind of trouble (financial?) before this even started. He's made some cash from the brainless people who believe anything that fits what they want to believe.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | October 7, 2025 9:57 PM |
[quote]He wouldn’t use a work pic, he’d use an expiring photo
What’s an expiring photo?
by Anonymous | reply 27 | October 8, 2025 6:48 AM |
Lying often and loudly really seems to be working for the other side.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | October 8, 2025 7:16 AM |
R27, it's when you send a photo on an app with that option: the photo displays for a limited time and then disappears. Hookup and dating apps often have this feature.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | October 8, 2025 3:21 PM |
R27, it’s a photo you send someone that can only be opened and viewed once by the recipient. In fact, lots of guys consider it to be a turn-off.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | October 8, 2025 4:26 PM |
And with disappearing photos you cannot do screen captures either. If you try, the result will just be a black screen. That's when an iPad or second phone comes in handy to record the image as soon as it appears...
by Anonymous | reply 31 | October 8, 2025 6:12 PM |
[quote][R27], it's when you send a photo on an app with that option: the photo displays for a limited time and then disappears. Hookup and dating apps often have this feature.
But Grindr doesn’t have this feature so how does it apply here?
by Anonymous | reply 32 | October 8, 2025 7:00 PM |
I’m tired of hearing about this. Either put up or shutup.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | October 8, 2025 7:05 PM |
R32, the original point was that Johnson would never send the photo shown, because no closeted guy would send a clear and recognizable photo of their face unless it was a disappearing photo. No one is saying it's a feature on Grindr and the point is moot since all of this was fabricated.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | October 8, 2025 7:11 PM |
Of course they’re saying it’s a feature of Grindr. Why mention it as a possibility if it isn’t?
by Anonymous | reply 35 | October 8, 2025 7:14 PM |
I look at Moses Mike when someone says spicy and I think cloves.
by Anonymous | reply 37 | October 8, 2025 9:59 PM |