Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Why do Auto Buffs Love the 1961 Lincoln Continental?

I think it was just ugly! Slab sided and awkward looking. But the way enthusiasts and collectors wax poetic about it, you’d think that it was designed by Michelangelo himself!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 21September 21, 2025 2:08 AM

Suicide doors

Loved it as a Dinky Toy, or maybe a Corgi.

by Anonymousreply 1September 20, 2025 1:32 AM

Along with the Corvair and the1963 Pontiac, it ushered in 1960s US car design, which was more restrained than the cars that came before them. The 1960 Lincoln (see link) is gaudy in comparison.

Even though it is a huge car, it is smaller and more compact than the 1958-60 Lincolns. This car was designed in 1958-59, during the Eisenhower recession, when buyers were rejecting big 50s cars and starting to buy smaller, more timeless cars like VWs. GM redesigned their full sized cars in 1961 as well, and they weighed less and were smaller and cleaner looking than their 1960 predecessors.

Also, because of JFK’s assassination, the 1960s Continentals are linked to The Kennedy Era, especially for Baby Boomers.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 2September 20, 2025 1:41 AM

I prefer a 1955 Lincoln Continental

by Anonymousreply 3September 20, 2025 2:15 AM

I love the ‘61 Conti.

by Anonymousreply 4September 20, 2025 2:19 AM

The '61-'63's were compact for a luxury car (shorter than a Mercury). The styling was simple, clean, no fins, little chrome. The suicide doors. The 4-door convertible with the disappearing top. They were different from anything else at the time.

Jackie Kennedy drove a '61. They were considered the tasteful alternative to Cadillacs and Imperials.

There were no 2-door models. If you wanted a luxury compact 2-door, there was the Continental's sister car, the Thunderbird.

by Anonymousreply 5September 20, 2025 2:45 AM

[quote]I prefer a 1955 Lincoln Continental

You mean the 1956-57 Continental.

There was no 1955 Lincoln Continental.

by Anonymousreply 6September 20, 2025 2:48 AM

1955 - they had the Capri only, right?

by Anonymousreply 7September 20, 2025 12:02 PM

R7 Capri and Premiere

by Anonymousreply 8September 20, 2025 12:21 PM

So they were called suicide doors because if, IF they opened at speed, it would be dangerous to reach out and close them.

Did many open at speed?

by Anonymousreply 9September 20, 2025 12:51 PM

R9 didn’t they have some sort of latch to hold the door in place?

by Anonymousreply 10September 20, 2025 12:53 PM

Compared with their late 50s models, the design was clean and functional.

by Anonymousreply 11September 20, 2025 1:00 PM

They kept the same basic body and chassis for a long time afterward and and refined the basic design further.

by Anonymousreply 12September 20, 2025 1:01 PM

Convertibles in good condition are worth a lot.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 13September 20, 2025 1:03 PM

I’d go for the ragtop before the sedan.

by Anonymousreply 14September 20, 2025 5:07 PM

R9 - I've read that the Chicago Outfit used cars with suicide doors for executions. A drive out in the country and a little shove.

by Anonymousreply 15September 20, 2025 5:50 PM

Its reminds me of the car in which JFK was assassinated, albeit on a smaller scale.

by Anonymousreply 16September 20, 2025 7:22 PM

Watch this:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 17September 20, 2025 7:29 PM

It reminds you of that car because it is that car: a Lincoln Continental...on a longer wheelbase.

by Anonymousreply 18September 20, 2025 7:29 PM

I don't think I've ever liked it, regardless of the generation. The final one was a major disappointment because they based it on a stretched Fusion platform; they cheaped out on it. Very frustrating thing that US carmakers do - build things to a cost and INSIST that it's as good as the foreign competition.

by Anonymousreply 19September 21, 2025 1:06 AM

IMHO the nicest ones were the 1961 to 1963 versions.

In 1964 they kept the same basic styling but they lengthened the car a bit, squared off the roofline and tragically got rid of the curved side glass and made the side windows of flat glass. They also gave the car a new dash that looked like it belonged in a Mercury.

In '65 they gave it a cheap looking grill.

In 1966 they gave it a whole new restyled body. It was now a bigger car but it was a very attractive update. A coupe was added.

In 1968 they got rid of the convertible.

By 1970 this series was gone, replaced by a big fat barge. No more suicide doors, no convertible.

So IMHO the only really nice Continentals were the '61 to '63 and the '66 & '67s.

by Anonymousreply 20September 21, 2025 1:42 AM

R17 that ideo is glaring with errors.

McNamara was defense secretary for both JFK and LBJ. His dates are a bit all over the place.

by Anonymousreply 21September 21, 2025 2:08 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!