Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

At Close Range 1986 film

Any fans here?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35September 6, 2025 6:52 PM

Trailer

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1September 4, 2025 10:03 PM

[quote] Any fans here?

Who lived to tell.

by Anonymousreply 2September 4, 2025 10:08 PM

Sean Penn was at his hottest in this film.

by Anonymousreply 3September 4, 2025 10:17 PM

I never saw it. But I loved Madge's song.

by Anonymousreply 4September 4, 2025 10:18 PM

Theme song and video Live To Tell by Madonna

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 5September 4, 2025 10:20 PM

I saw it in college. The pretentious USC film majors laughed when Madonna's name came up. When the director came out to speak he asked why?

People said it was because her name in the credits was so much larger than the rest of the words.

by Anonymousreply 6September 4, 2025 10:21 PM

According to Patrick Leonard, Madonna never intended to sing the song. He asked her to write lyrics and add to the melody in hopes that he could sell the song to a big name male artist who would want to sing it as she thought it was too low for her to sing.

by Anonymousreply 7September 4, 2025 10:25 PM

It received great reviews, but was a box office failure. It has gained cult status, though.

by Anonymousreply 8September 4, 2025 10:28 PM

It's worst Madonna song I've heard.

by Anonymousreply 9September 4, 2025 10:28 PM

I liked The Falcon and the Snowman better.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10September 4, 2025 10:28 PM

R9 You’re in the minority there.

by Anonymousreply 11September 4, 2025 10:29 PM

Both ACR and FALCON were terrific. Penn was really at the top of his game.

by Anonymousreply 12September 4, 2025 10:41 PM

r8 Meanwhile, Sean Penn gained cunt status.

by Anonymousreply 13September 4, 2025 11:03 PM

Who acted better in it: Sean Penn or Christopher Walken?

by Anonymousreply 14September 5, 2025 2:07 AM

"Live to Tell" went to #1 on the Billboard Top 100, so why didn't it get an Oscar nomination? The 1986 Best Song nominees were:

- "Glory of Love" from THE KARATE KID PART II (went to #1)

- "Life in a Looking Glass" from THAT'S LIFE!

- "Mean Green Mother from Outer Space" from LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS

- "Somewhere Out There" from AN AMERICAN TAIL (went to #2)

- "Take My Breath Away" from TOP GUN (went to #1)

TOP GUN was the winner.

by Anonymousreply 15September 5, 2025 2:34 AM

Mary Stuart Masterson reminded me of Kristen Stewart.

by Anonymousreply 16September 5, 2025 2:40 AM

R15 It was ridiculous it didn’t win the Oscar much less not even earn a nomination. GOL is hokey as fuck.

by Anonymousreply 17September 5, 2025 3:05 AM

Patrick Leonard tells the story of how Warner fought Madonna hard on releasing LTT first, or at all. As he said, there was nothing like it on radio, and it was a long song, with stops in the middle. Her voice was very low, and it was a huge departure for her. Madonna said if they didn’t release it first she wouldn’t do any videos for TB singles. Pat said the execs at Warner were beyond angry at this power move and felt the song would flop hard. Madonna said it would be a hit. This cemented her control over her career.

by Anonymousreply 18September 5, 2025 3:14 AM

For those who don’t know, long songs rarely went #1 or go top 5 because airplay was a huge factor in chart position then. The longer the song the less likely radio would play it much, or the less they could play it as often. Its sales got it over the less radio play and into #1.

by Anonymousreply 19September 5, 2025 3:17 AM

It's a great song.

by Anonymousreply 20September 5, 2025 3:18 AM

Pat talking about the crazy day LTT was written. It is a wild story. VERY Hollywood.

For those who said Pat wrote the song and not Madonna, he sets the record very straight. He only wrote a few bars of the score. She wrote all lyrics, and wrote part of the melody plus the entire bridge. He asked her to write lyrics. She wrote it for a male singer.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 21September 5, 2025 3:23 AM

I wonder why the movie bombed. Great reviews, great popular song, great story. Everyone I know who has seen it really likes it. Was it too dark to release in spring of 1986? Would a fall/winter release have been better?

by Anonymousreply 22September 5, 2025 3:30 AM

Mary Masterson was box office poison.

by Anonymousreply 23September 5, 2025 3:41 AM

1986. was a dark year: The Hitcher; Aliens; 9 1/2 Weeks; River's Edge; Blue Velvet; Witchboard; Extremities...

by Anonymousreply 24September 5, 2025 4:11 AM

The 80s with the synth music. I actually forgot how bad and prevalent it was in movies and shows. How could we stand it?

by Anonymousreply 25September 5, 2025 4:26 AM

[quote] Was it too dark to release in spring of 1986? Would a fall/winter release have been better?

I think the movie is dark and the father-son discord is a hard watch. Walker was genuinely terrifying.

by Anonymousreply 26September 5, 2025 7:20 AM

I’ve written this before, but the scene with an injured Sean Penn confronting Christopher Walken at his home is a master class in acting from Walken. Fear, bravado, nuance, resignation all in one scene. Brilliant.

by Anonymousreply 27September 5, 2025 7:50 AM

I vaguely remember this movie as being at the height of the Madonna/Penn affair/murder-suicide pact. God it's hard to believe now that those two used to be considered the cool kids.

by Anonymousreply 28September 5, 2025 11:24 AM

How many different versions are there of this movie?

Uncut versions, etc?

by Anonymousreply 29September 5, 2025 2:54 PM

[quote]The 80s with the synth music. I actually forgot how bad and prevalent it was in movies and shows. How could we stand it?

Last year, I watched EDUCATING RITA for the first time and the synth score was godawful!

The film was fine, but the synth music was like a below-average Giorgio Moroder score, so if you were just listening to the soundtrack, it's got its charms.

However, it is SO out-of-place and wrong for the plot and images of the movie.

The music is unbelievably jarring and not at all matching the tone and mood of EDUCATING RITA.

by Anonymousreply 30September 5, 2025 3:37 PM

R30 I love Educating Rita (I always wanted to turn it into a musical called “Educating Chita”) and played Frank in a production at the college where I taught. I think it is one of Caine’s best performances and it was my first glimpse of the wonderful Julie Walter’s. All that said, I agree that the score for the soundtrack is awful, not only because of the artificial sound of the synth, but because it repeated that melodramatic and derivative theme about every ten minutes, seemingly because the director (and editor) did not know how to build and end a scene. It began to feel like the soap opera music Carol Burnett parodied in “As the Stomach Turns.” The handful of secondary characters were also not well cast nor well directed. It would have worked better as a filmed play with Caine and Walters growing with and on each other over the 90 or so minutes.

It was Duvall’s and MacLaine’s year (and in Caine’s case, he was probably hurt by the fact that all four nominees other than Duvall were British). Ironically, “Tender Mercies” may be one of Duvall’s least interesting performances. Courtney and Finney probably canceled each other out and Conti, while wonderful, was in one of those bittersweet comedies that probably looks easier than it is. All the women were strong—you know it’s a touch year when Streep’s Silkwood, fine on its own terms, feels less compelling than the other four.

by Anonymousreply 31September 5, 2025 4:03 PM

If you like synth scores please revisit Against All Odds. Lots of zhooms and wooshes.

by Anonymousreply 32September 5, 2025 6:54 PM

The synth score felt so wrong in the 1920s period piece "Chariots of Fire."

by Anonymousreply 33September 5, 2025 6:59 PM

I meant sounded so wrong.

by Anonymousreply 34September 5, 2025 7:12 PM

I thought the Chariots Of Fire music was a bit naff at the time in my childhood, but now I think it makes the movie and elevates it to a kind of timelessness. It makes it sort of avant-garde.

by Anonymousreply 35September 6, 2025 6:52 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!