Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Section 8 and luxury living

This is exactly why Democrats are losing support among middle- and working-class voters. The average Section 8 tenancy has now stretched to more than 15 years. Trump’s proposal to cap it at just two years is far too extreme in the other direction. What we actually need is a bipartisan, middle-ground solution—but that’s impossible so long as the extremes in both parties keep pulling the debate apart. Until they lose power, moderates and swing voters from both parties will continue to be ignored, and that’s simply not fair.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 9September 1, 2025 4:18 PM

So you think that Section 8 should be temporary? How about work requirements? ...oh, oh, there already are.

When England figured out all the rich people owned the land, they created Council Flats. We have reached the point where the earnings curve has crossed the OWNING curve, and being in Section 8 is more or less permanent for poor people. If you are a Trump MAGA and you are in Section 8, Trump is going to kill you along with the rest of the poors. Trump really hates Poor MAGA as much as he hates Poor Libs.

It would be much better if the Feds passed laws to prohibit the corporate investing in single family residential homes.

But we know that Republicans would rather see children starve than lose profits.

by Anonymousreply 1September 1, 2025 4:04 PM

This is just a re-statement of Ronald Reagan's lie that welfare queens are driving Cadillacs and living in the lap of luxury at taxpayer expense. This conjecture was exposed as an outright fabrication then, and it will be again now.

If Section 8 housing is so fabulous, why aren't you on it, OP?

by Anonymousreply 2September 1, 2025 4:05 PM

these are lies

by Anonymousreply 3September 1, 2025 4:06 PM

Notice that they didn't actually provide proof that someone was living for free in a $6k/month apartment.

It's a fucking lie.

Conservatives lie about literally everything.

by Anonymousreply 4September 1, 2025 4:08 PM

lies

by Anonymousreply 5September 1, 2025 4:09 PM

[quote] “Time limits are kind of an encouragement, like ‘hey, you can do this,’” continued Turner. “We’re not just telling you to work, we’re going to have workforce training around you, we’re going to have skill training around you to get out of government subsidies, to live a life of self-sustainability.”

Yeah, this just seems like the kind of shit people say when they really have no actual plan. We'll dick around with a few "retraining" programs in completely obsolete jobs and then kick your ass out the door. You'll get a job at walmart or some shit and, surprise, surprise, not make enough to afford any rent in any reasonable place to live.

by Anonymousreply 6September 1, 2025 4:09 PM

And what happens to the owners of these properties if the gop gets its way and kills section 8? Same thing that is happening to business owners who relied on a stable and predictable set of international trade agreements. Except they won’t have section 8 to live in when they end up bankrupt.

by Anonymousreply 7September 1, 2025 4:12 PM

I defy anyone to 1) get approved for Section 8 and then 2) find a landlord of a $6000-per-month house [italic]anywhere[/italic] willing to rent to them. The scenario that this Trumptard claims and MSN printed is so far out of the realm of reality that it is laughable. And it would be funny if it weren't going to directly hurt poor people (the majority of whom are white, old and vote for Trump) the most while we gleefully hand out $billions to corporations in tax subsidies, and that includes to the most profitable corporations on the planet: oil companies.

We could pay for housing for every poor American by redirecting corporate welfare and still have $billions left over.

by Anonymousreply 8September 1, 2025 4:17 PM

R2, I was a welfare coordinator working ADC/Medicaid benefits when, as we said, "We still helped people".

Then Reagan came in and created class warfare with Welfare Queens on Section 8 and Food Stamps.

I never met a welfare queen on my case load, but I will tell you that the families on my case load were equally divided between Blacks Latinos and Whites. But I can tell you that NOBODY would WANT to live in Section 8. It is pure warehousing of dispensable people and families. It is one step up from the urine saturated elevators of Cabrini-Green, of blessed memory.

If Project 2025 comes to fruition, and the Civil War was fought over the way state do business, then if you are on Social Security, SNAP, Medicaid, LIEA or any Federal program that the southern states did not sign up for to give money away to freed slaves, you will die of starvation in the streets.

by Anonymousreply 9September 1, 2025 4:18 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!