New gay porn power couple from Dallas, David Rage and Andrew Rage

David is a cancer survivor which accounts for his scar. I follow him on IG but forgot what his real name is.

Life in plastic.

“Look at me! Look at me! Look at me!”

The scar is on his tummy. Not his groin!

People can come to this? I just watch the old stuff now. If I watch anything other than Reddit as I’m starting to think porn is bad.

And we thought Drew Dixon's Party City wiglet was as bad as it could get. Apparently not.

Yuck.

They’re like Burton and Taylor, but instead of the Krupp diamond, the brunette slut gives butt plugs and poppers to the blond slut.

Yuck

[quote]They’re like Burton and Taylor, but instead of the Krupp diamond, the brunette slut gives butt plugs and poppers to the blond slut.

And they won't be appearing on "Here's Lucy."

Which one of them is the Singing Rage?

Inflatable.

Sorry, I meant this one.

^ They do look like a pair of blowup dolls in that photo.

No Words.

So klassy

Models like these are why I don't watch porn anymore. Recorded or in-real-time stuff on OF or other sites is fun, and one can be really selective.

No. Color it as you will, just average Queens.

I'm sure they're all the rage

In the early 20th century, when Bonnie and Clyde were growing up in West Dallas, which at the time was a hellish slum but has since undergone significant revitalization, it was known as The Devil's Back Porch. That should be one of their porn movie titles.

♪ Bonnie and Clyde were pretty lookin' people, but I can tell you people, they were the Devil's children ♫

I weep.

R13 nice cocks. 👍

[quote]power couple

They can't even work up a spark of static electricity in a room in the middle of a desert.

This is why I only watch amateur porn.The real stuff,not the studio produced crap . I look at the pic at R12 and nothing is sexy to me in the least . Shaved bodies are an instant boner killer to me.

Just watched their porno. No offense but really bad!

None of these men make me even a tiny bit hard.

In fact, most professionally produced porn these days does nothing for me.

Mannequins.

I like the dark-haired one. The blonde looks plastic and has no sexual vibe.

A compound noun with "power" often refers to something deplorable.

R12’s photo shoot clearly had a choreographer.

Some of the ugliest people I’ve ever seen. Plastic from head to toe.

I’m surprised they have genitalia given they’re going for the Ken doll look.

People really get off to this? Jesus.

Repulsive.

Men.com has got to be the worst gay porn company in history. It's like they're determined to force gross, dick-wilting content on us. Plastic-y looking cookie-smellers full of steroids, fillers and tattoo ink but with zero-zilch-no actual sex appeal. Who watches this crap? Who pays for it? Does anyone really achieve orgasm looking at this?

[quote]"Don't Spit On Me, I'll Come" (wasn't that the title of an Edith Wharton novel)

Hilarious! I'm dead.

There’s just too much going on with them—the chiseled bodies, designer hair, big cocks.

What makes porn interesting is that when their’s a sliver of hope that they are standard human beings that we could aspire to or have sex with ourselves.

They look more like mannequins

We are so proud that they found a job.

The blonde just looks so fake. The brunette looks better.

I prefer the Elaine mannequin.