"Valley Of The Dolls" (1967)
Hugely popular novel; successful Director at the helm; Oscar-caliber stars (Garland, Duke, then Hayward); hit song...
Yeah, the script was sketchy- but that could be corrected. Why didn't A-list stars want to be involved?
Why did this become a campy trainwreck?
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 53 | August 22, 2025 2:56 PM
|
I highly recommend this book for any fans of the film. Full of tidbits like Debbie Reynolds wanted to play Neely and Petula Clark and Tammy Grimes came very close to getting the role.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 1 | August 21, 2025 4:21 PM
|
Debbie Reynolds as Neely? Oy. Talk about being a little long in the tooth for a role...
by Anonymous | reply 2 | August 21, 2025 4:24 PM
|
You may find this thread of interest.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 3 | August 21, 2025 4:24 PM
|
VOTD is worthy of multiple threads!
by Anonymous | reply 4 | August 21, 2025 4:28 PM
|
R2. Older than dirt and twice as annoying.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | August 21, 2025 4:28 PM
|
oh please OP. Just because the novel was a hit doesn't mean anyone wanted to be associated with it. Trash is trash.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | August 21, 2025 4:29 PM
|
The cast was very far from A-list, most of the main actors came from television, Sharon Tate had mostly been in exploitation and B-movies, and director Mark Robson, though promising in the 1940s and a biggish deal in the 1950s (“Peyton Place”) was well into his hack phase by the mid-“60s.
None of it mattered, as bad as the film was and as poorly reviewed as it was, it was as big a cash cow as the book had been and made a fortune relative to budget.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | August 21, 2025 4:41 PM
|
The book balanced the fabulousness and the misfortunes of all three main characters' much better than the movie. It seems like they skipped two beats and then went straight to the pills. Sharon Tate was not the worst actress in it, either.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | August 21, 2025 5:05 PM
|
[quote] Sharon Tate was not the worst actress in it, either.
Well fuck you.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | August 21, 2025 5:14 PM
|
The three characters never even have one scene together in the movie save for a still shot of them at Neely’s wedding. In the book, they were all roommates for a while.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | August 21, 2025 5:24 PM
|
I couldn’t get through five pages of the book. Loved the campy movie since I was a kid.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | August 21, 2025 5:39 PM
|
It turned Robert Evans into one of the most powerful men in Hollywood.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | August 21, 2025 5:44 PM
|
Robson had turned another trashy noel (Peyton Place) into a decent and financially successful film. That may have been why he was chosen.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | August 21, 2025 6:36 PM
|
I’m sure it was, R14, but “Peyton Place” was ten years earlier, and that film had a sense of detail and character development and a genuine atmosphere of a small New England town (filmed in Camden, Maine.)
“Valley of the Dolls” was cheap schlock with a somewhat atmospheric opening in the prologue before going flashily downhill from there.
Not that I’m complaining, I love watching it.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | August 21, 2025 6:57 PM
|
[quote]R11 The three characters never even have one scene together… In the book, they were all roommates for a while.
Yes. And before that they’re all connected to Helen’s musical HIT THE SKY! For chapter upon chapter…
by Anonymous | reply 16 | August 21, 2025 7:03 PM
|
I will say this till the day I die: Barbara Parkins is deadly boring as Anne, and she’s at the center of the story.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | August 21, 2025 7:06 PM
|
R17. Imagine her as Neely.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 18 | August 21, 2025 7:07 PM
|
dear lord.
She even makes Neely into a limp, wet rag.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | August 21, 2025 7:36 PM
|
R19 You're being obnoxious!
by Anonymous | reply 20 | August 21, 2025 9:32 PM
|
And Richard Dreyfuss before he was Richard Dreyfuss!
by Anonymous | reply 21 | August 22, 2025 12:31 AM
|
R21. And Nathan Lane played the same role in the dreadful Lisa Hartman mini series. It's a star making part!
by Anonymous | reply 22 | August 22, 2025 12:37 AM
|
Nothing beats that tree song with the smudged mobile.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | August 22, 2025 12:39 AM
|
Helen looks like she's singing in her rec room to a bunch of friends. What kind of theater production number is that? Why does the film look so cheap?
by Anonymous | reply 24 | August 22, 2025 1:02 AM
|
R17, I read the book, Anne was deadly boring on the page as well. Christ, she's numbed up to her eyeballs with those damned dolls for page after page after page, while her husband is fucking Neely on the west coast. And she knows he's fucking Neely, but she just can't do a thing about it because of those damned dolls.
The book is deadly boring...
by Anonymous | reply 25 | August 22, 2025 1:03 AM
|
[quote] Why does the film look so cheap?
Because it was, Blanche! It was cheap!
by Anonymous | reply 26 | August 22, 2025 1:07 AM
|
[quote] Helen looks like she's singing in her rec room to a bunch of friends
Friends she has yet to know. And if they are strangers, brother, well so is she!
by Anonymous | reply 27 | August 22, 2025 1:08 AM
|
The actress who took over for drunken Neely at the end. was a Streisand figure in sailor suit. Notice? It was 1966.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | August 22, 2025 1:43 AM
|
She had Streisand's hair but, thankfully, not her nose.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | August 22, 2025 2:02 AM
|
R25 I love in the movie when Neely flat out says to Anne and Lyon during their visit to the nuthouse that as soon as she can she wants to "have that man of your Anne".
by Anonymous | reply 30 | August 22, 2025 3:05 AM
|
Who would we cast in a remake? Viola Davis IS Helen Lawson!
by Anonymous | reply 31 | August 22, 2025 3:15 AM
|
All remakes of this trash have BEEN trash!
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 32 | August 22, 2025 3:19 AM
|
[quote]R25 I read the book, Anne was deadly boring on the page as well.
Anne’s involved in more interesting stuff in the book (at least in its first half.)
She dates a multi millionaire (Allen Cooper) out of pity, thinking he’s a deadbeat salesman. Then she has a long, toxic friendship with Helen that blows up in her face.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | August 22, 2025 3:34 AM
|
Barbara Parkins couldn't act.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | August 22, 2025 3:39 AM
|
^^ You're being obnoxious! .
by Anonymous | reply 36 | August 22, 2025 3:40 AM
|
The girls I grew up with LOVED this movie. I suppose there weren't that many movies about young career women at the time?
by Anonymous | reply 37 | August 22, 2025 3:41 AM
|
All the male actors are boring, too! Lyon Burke is supposed to have tons of charisma and sex appeal.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 38 | August 22, 2025 3:46 AM
|
Bonnie Franklin is Neely. Linda Lavin is Helen.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | August 22, 2025 4:29 AM
|
Dimwit blonde Georgia Engel as Jennifer.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | August 22, 2025 6:38 AM
|
Can someone with a personality please play Anne?!
by Anonymous | reply 41 | August 22, 2025 6:39 AM
|
NO A-LIST STARS!!!!! NO A-LIST STARS!!! How dare you! I salvaged that effin' trainwreck with my fabulous performance. And almost got my damn head chopped off by that effin' mobile! Meanwhile that horrid bitch Anne Welles, that New England frosted cuntsicle, is sitting in the front row looking like she just got fucked by a dead cat. I'll plant my own tree, all right, right up your.........
by Anonymous | reply 43 | August 22, 2025 6:53 AM
|
The train ride at the beginning is eerily similar to the train ride at the beginning of THAT GIRL.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | August 22, 2025 7:16 AM
|
And That Girl had Ethel Merman (i.e Helen Lawson) on TWICE.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | August 22, 2025 7:25 AM
|
And let's not forget Jennifer's lesbian subplot and Tony's proclivity for anal - alas, still too steamy for 1967.
by Anonymous | reply 47 | August 22, 2025 8:47 AM
|
“Valley of the Dolls”, the novel, starts slowly but builds. My favorite Susann novel is “Once is Not Enough” which is just insane and has big celebs with tiny dicks, a lesbian in name only, downtown NYC hippie theater scene, Electra complex, a WWII atrocity with raped nuns, and an ambiguous ending where the heroine either commits suicide in the ocean or is kidnapped by aliens. Either answer is appropriate.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | August 22, 2025 10:39 AM
|
R49, your description of "Once is Not Enough"... is that snarkiness or true? especially the ending.
And here's a thought for a new book club for gay men "of a certain age," we should meet and every month (or two weeks - these are quick reads) and discuss every Sidney Sheldon Jackie Collins, Judith Kranz, Jacqueline Susann novel.
Trash, trash and more trash. First read of COURSE is Peyton Place. Then VOTD...
by Anonymous | reply 50 | August 22, 2025 10:48 AM
|
R49, I couldn’t make that up.
Susann even uses that ending as the jumping off point for an unrelated scifi novel entitled “Yargo” that was published posthumously.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | August 22, 2025 11:34 AM
|
I think R49 is meant to be read in the voice of Stefon from SNL.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | August 22, 2025 11:59 AM
|
[quote]R49 My favorite Susann novel is “Once is Not Enough” which is just insane and has big celebs with tiny dicks, a lesbian in name only, downtown NYC hippie theater scene, Electra complex, a WWII atrocity with raped nuns, and an ambiguous ending where the heroine either commits suicide in the ocean or is kidnapped by aliens.
You also get ejaculate harvested for skincare.
by Anonymous | reply 53 | August 22, 2025 2:56 PM
|