Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Sharon Stone As Phyllis Diller

The result could be either the greatest performance of any actor's career, or the campiest of all time!

What do we think about the possibility of this happening, and can we think of any other, say, casting oddities. Like Bradley Cooper as Woody Allen, or Glenn Close as Ethel Merman.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 66August 13, 2025 5:09 AM

This will be terrible.

by Anonymousreply 1August 10, 2025 6:48 PM

Sharon Stone as Phyllis ROGERS Stone.

by Anonymousreply 2August 10, 2025 6:48 PM

Sharon Stone as Phyllis Lindstrom, maybe.

by Anonymousreply 3August 10, 2025 6:50 PM

Phyllis Diller was amazing but so over the top that this will seem like an impersonation.

by Anonymousreply 4August 10, 2025 6:51 PM

I could see it happening. Then gain, I can also imagine Catherine Zeta-Jones as Susan Sontag.

by Anonymousreply 5August 10, 2025 7:00 PM

This could be amazing.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 6August 10, 2025 7:01 PM

Only if directed by Lars von Trier.

by Anonymousreply 7August 10, 2025 7:11 PM

With whose range, exactly? Not hers!

by Anonymousreply 8August 10, 2025 7:13 PM

I would watch the shit out of this whether it's a train wreck or a masterpiece.

by Anonymousreply 9August 10, 2025 7:21 PM

Ryan Murphy should do this!

by Anonymousreply 10August 10, 2025 7:23 PM

[quote] Then gain, I can also imagine Catherine Zeta-Jones as Susan Sontag.

During her college years, you forgot to add.

by Anonymousreply 11August 10, 2025 7:26 PM

She needs to stop dreaming about all these movie projects that'll never materialise and start doing TV already.

by Anonymousreply 12August 10, 2025 7:28 PM

Maybe Sharon could pull off Phyllis Pruitt in “The Pruitts of Southampton , “ but could she really manage the subtleties of Miss Knabenshu in “Did You Hear The One About The Traveling Saleslady ?”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 13August 10, 2025 7:46 PM

Yes, please do this. There’s nothing to worry about. It will garner you that Best Actress Oscar you so deserve.

by Anonymousreply 14August 10, 2025 7:49 PM

I knew Phyliis. She was actually an amazing woman. And a very brave one. She was doing stand up comedy at a time when women weren't supposed to be doing stand up, at all. She wouldn't accept that and basically just pushed herself forward. however, to do that, she said that she had to turn herself into a caricature so as not be really a woman as much as almost a clown. Otherwise she wouldn't get booked.

She was way ahead of her time and totally under-appreciated today. There wouldn't have been a Joan Rivers or a Lily Tomlin if it hadn't been for Phyllis.

by Anonymousreply 15August 10, 2025 8:09 PM

They'll have to apply a lot of makeup. Sharon is gorgeous and Phyllis was not.

by Anonymousreply 16August 10, 2025 8:39 PM

Only if John Waters directs.

by Anonymousreply 17August 10, 2025 8:51 PM

I can scarcely imagine a film more packed with dramatic incident.

by Anonymousreply 18August 10, 2025 8:57 PM

The most genius casting since Cary Grant played Cole Porter.

by Anonymousreply 19August 10, 2025 8:58 PM

[quote]There wouldn't have been a Joan Rivers or a Lily Tomlin if it hadn't been for Phyllis.

Not to mention Mrs. Maisel.

by Anonymousreply 20August 10, 2025 9:00 PM

Twenty replies and no young whippersnapper has posted, “Nobody knows who she is.” Eldergays of DL, we’re making progress!

by Anonymousreply 21August 10, 2025 9:04 PM

[quote] There wouldn't have been a Joan Rivers or a Lily Tomlin if it hadn't been for Phyllis.

Or Totie Fields.

by Anonymousreply 22August 10, 2025 9:05 PM

For sheer hilarity she rivalled Bob Hope.

by Anonymousreply 23August 10, 2025 9:06 PM

What's next...Nicole Kidman as Lucille Ball?!

by Anonymousreply 24August 10, 2025 9:17 PM

Forget Phyllis Diller, who’s going to star in the Joe Flynn biopic?

by Anonymousreply 25August 10, 2025 9:23 PM

I think it would be great, if she has the guts to actually try to look like Phyllis.

by Anonymousreply 26August 10, 2025 9:48 PM

Tom Hanks for Bob Hope!

by Anonymousreply 27August 10, 2025 10:08 PM

Who would ever put Sharon as a lead at this point? Her delusion knows no boundaries.

by Anonymousreply 28August 10, 2025 10:16 PM

Or a Barbra, R15

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 29August 10, 2025 10:28 PM

Maybe she really does have a brain tumor this time.

by Anonymousreply 30August 10, 2025 10:30 PM

Phyllis Diller worked literally up until she died. I remember her as an EMT on Blossom with the ugly brother.

by Anonymousreply 31August 11, 2025 12:46 AM

Phyllis Diller, out of her act, was a brilliant & quiet woman.

by Anonymousreply 32August 11, 2025 1:20 AM

I couldn't imagine Charlize Theron as Aileen Wournos or Michael Douglas as Liberace but they were both great!

by Anonymousreply 33August 11, 2025 1:57 AM

Sharon Stone is a wonderful actress - DONT DO IT! Two words: Mommy Dearest.

by Anonymousreply 34August 11, 2025 2:07 AM

Disaster. She doesn't have enough empathy to get into such a character's head. Don't think she could handle even an attempted imitation -- look at her bad Brooklyn accent in "Gloria". This is a role for Natasha Lyonne, Carol Kane, or Meryl. Natasha is reportedly "in talks" to do Joan Rivers, so that might not work.

My partner says, "only if it's directed by John Waters"!

by Anonymousreply 35August 11, 2025 2:19 AM

Look, I’m no member of MENSA like Ms. Stone, but even I know this is a bad idea!

by Anonymousreply 36August 11, 2025 2:20 AM

Ooops -- sorry r17, you beat him to it:)

by Anonymousreply 37August 11, 2025 2:21 AM

Desperate to play her? Sharon honey, you're just Desperate. Period.

by Anonymousreply 38August 11, 2025 2:34 AM

Hmmm... How 'bout Kathy Griffin?

That I could see.

by Anonymousreply 39August 11, 2025 2:37 AM

Search for a talented UNKNOWN- Surprise us!

by Anonymousreply 40August 11, 2025 2:46 AM

Her husband’s name was Fang? Really?

by Anonymousreply 41August 11, 2025 2:47 AM

[quote]Sharon Stone is a wonderful actress - DONT DO IT! Two words: Mommy Dearest.

Oh, dear.

by Anonymousreply 42August 11, 2025 5:20 AM

The only one who could pull this off is Tracey Ullman. Phyllis is too big a personality for most actresses to do and many aren’t willing to “go there.” They’d probably do some watered down version of her.

by Anonymousreply 43August 11, 2025 5:22 AM

Rep 15:

In addition to that, she was also in a few movies, the first to publicize her extensive cosmetic surgery in the mid-1970s and authored quite a few comedic books.

I don't think Stone has the chops to do Diller.

by Anonymousreply 44August 11, 2025 5:48 AM

Diller had so much plastic surgery that by the end, she was almost pretty.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 45August 11, 2025 6:12 AM

Diller wasn't ugly but her character was meant to be outrageous so she played up the homliness.

by Anonymousreply 46August 11, 2025 6:21 AM

I hope it's good. TV has been hitting the skids.

by Anonymousreply 47August 11, 2025 6:25 AM

Diller was also a classical concert pianist.

by Anonymousreply 48August 11, 2025 6:53 AM

I adored her and barely knew her material beyond "My oven is so dirty there's only room to bake a single cupcake."

by Anonymousreply 49August 11, 2025 7:00 AM

I think it will be Sharon’s chemistry (or lack thereof) with whomever they find to play Fang that will really make or break this picture.

by Anonymousreply 50August 11, 2025 7:14 AM

There are few performers in Hollywood who possess the diversity of talent, high-octane beauty and scorching sensuality of Sharon Stone. Now, with her dream project of portraying the legendary Phillis Diller beginning to actualize, Tinseltown and the world will see a cinematic transformation like none before.

Sharon will not only portray but embody Phyllis, infusing her characterization with the complexity and pathos this icon deserves. Cinema goers will finally see Sharon’s scalding sense of humor onscreen, opening up a world of new casting possibilities that were formerly limited by Sharon’s breathless beauty.

With the aid of some of the finest facial prostheses in Hollywood history, viewers and the Academy will be speechless as they witness not only a transformation, but a physical embodiment of a comedic legend.

The journey started with “Basic Instinct,” a film that shook cinema with its heat and took the world by storm. It continued with “Casino,” a journey that the Academy took note of and established Sharon as a cinematic visionary. Now, with her Phyllis Diller biopic, the journey will be both complete and just beginning.

Sharon will finally have her date with Oscar and their union will officially be made formal after this project. There was always only one actress, one legend who had the passion, skill and ability to pull off this near impossible characterization. That actress, that legend, is Sharon Stone.

by Anonymousreply 51August 11, 2025 3:08 PM

[quote]Sharon will finally have her date with Oscar

Pics please.

by Anonymousreply 52August 11, 2025 5:33 PM

Well, here's a timely interview with La Belle Femme Stone. It illustrates why she couldn't successfully take on a role like Phyllis Diller. She's just too into herself.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 53August 11, 2025 6:22 PM

Did Phyllis ever show her hoo-ha?

by Anonymousreply 54August 11, 2025 7:03 PM

[quote]The young Stone was exceptionally bright, as she’s quick to tell me. She describes herself as “fiercely intelligent” (two well-chosen words) and her IQ is reportedly 154 (genius level). She skipped several grades at school; at 15, she and four boys were sent to Edinboro State College in Pennsylvania as an “experiment”, three years ahead of most of their peers. She majored in English literature and excelled at golf, but left before graduating. “My college professor was furious when I was leaving for modelling,” she says. “He was like: ‘You’re throwing away your career,’ because he really thought my career was in writing.”

Our Sharon has been sipping from the well of untruths again. And it appears she has overindulged.

[quote] “Why didn’t I get more parts? I really wish you could tell me. Sometimes I think it was because I was too good.”

Never change, Sharon. Never change.

by Anonymousreply 55August 11, 2025 7:42 PM

She did comedy on Roseanne and was horrifically bad.

by Anonymousreply 56August 11, 2025 8:38 PM

Jennifer Saunders could pull it off, in her own manner.

by Anonymousreply 57August 11, 2025 10:46 PM

I couldn’t picture Renee Z as Judy, but she pulled it off. With the right director, makeup and costuming, Sharon could pull it off. Diller was pretty restrained in her delivery and mannerisms. Her look was over the top, but she wasn’t. That would be the nuance in playing her. That’s what any actor would need to nail.

by Anonymousreply 58August 11, 2025 10:53 PM

I don’t know if this is a good idea or not, but Phyllis Diller deserves to be remembered and a biopic would be appropriate.

There have been a lot of successful female standup comics, but Diller came first. Her success eased the way for theirs.

by Anonymousreply 59August 11, 2025 11:42 PM

Her autobiography "Like a Lampshade in a Whorehouse" is a good read.

She's a fine writer and a thoughtful woman. She details how she determined the proper hem length and boots to make her legs look particularly unflattering. Phyllis had five kids and a deadbeat husband, so she had to go to work, starting with calling veterans' hospitals and asking if they wanted a free comedy show.

As mentioned above, she was a respected concert pianist, a pretty good painter, and an outspoken atheist when people weren't talking about that in public.

by Anonymousreply 60August 12, 2025 12:07 AM

This is a great thread!

by Anonymousreply 61August 12, 2025 7:39 PM

R61 =. Our Sharon.

by Anonymousreply 62August 12, 2025 7:42 PM

[quote]Stone added, “You know, she didn’t hit it big until she was 49. She lived in a trailer park with five kids and her schizophrenic husband, and practiced her act on women at the laundromat.

None of this is true.

by Anonymousreply 63August 12, 2025 8:09 PM

She did Law & Order (SVU or original...can't remember) and stunk up the screen. Maybe this will earn her the Razzie Lifetime Achievement Award. I love a diva but Sharon Stone is a horrible, horrible actress. Basic Instinct and Casino were decent movies but hardly exclusively because of her performances.

by Anonymousreply 64August 12, 2025 8:47 PM

I really wish she would just do a bunch of remakes of latter era Crawford films, like Female on the Beach, Torch Song, or Queen Bee. Ever since I saw her in the remake of Diabolique in the '90s where she played a high school teacher in couture apparel and pumps, I realized that becoming the new latter era Crawford was her destiny...also, because she can't act.

by Anonymousreply 65August 12, 2025 10:29 PM

I love Stone in Casino. Great role for her.

by Anonymousreply 66August 13, 2025 5:09 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!