Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Why has the boyband phenomenon never recurred in American pop since the 90s while flourishing overseas?

Is it time to admit Lou Pearlman may have actually been uniquely talented?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10August 9, 2025 3:05 PM

We won’t be disrespected.

by Anonymousreply 1August 9, 2025 1:54 PM

I'm a huge fan of the Backstreet Boys.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 2August 9, 2025 1:55 PM

What’s JC chasez story? Is he still hot?

by Anonymousreply 3August 9, 2025 2:19 PM

Girl bands too.

by Anonymousreply 4August 9, 2025 2:21 PM

Perhaps, Americans want solo careers and want to avoid the inevitable conflicts that occur in groups due to ego.

[quote]In the 1990s and early 2000s, the collective image of a boy band worked well because fans often identified with the group as a whole or with a specific member. However, in today’s era of social media and individuality, audiences value unique, personal brands over group identities.

[quote]Social media platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter have given individual artists the power to build direct connections with fans. This cultural shift toward individualism has made the concept of a “group” feel less relevant. Modern listeners prefer to follow and support solo artists who share their personal journeys and stories rather than groups adhering to a generic formula.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 5August 9, 2025 2:51 PM

Are a bunch of douches sitting in their suburban living room or garage with a podcast the new boy band?

by Anonymousreply 6August 9, 2025 2:54 PM

The short answer is internationalization of the market coinciding with a resurgence of racism in America which has limited the popularity of boy (and girl) bands with racially diverse (or simply not white-enough) members. Imagine the TEAtard-cum-MAGAt furor when they discover their red-blooded 'Murican kids singing in Korean... yeah, not gonna happen. That there are now really only 3 record companies further plays into the answer; bigger companies demand more immediate hits and aren't willing to put the time and resources behind a group without a proven track record.

And no, Lou Pearlman was no savant. He had one talent. Think of him as the music industry's crooked answer to [italic]The Producers.[/italic]

by Anonymousreply 7August 9, 2025 2:55 PM

It's not dead...just old.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 8August 9, 2025 2:59 PM

They are syrupy pop. We’ve moved on

by Anonymousreply 9August 9, 2025 3:03 PM

[quote]...bigger companies demand more immediate hits and aren't willing to put the time and resources behind a group without a proven track record.

This. In the US, you must have immediate results and companies have neither the skill nor the patience to develop groups. But, you'd think that maybe somebody would put together a group such as Simon Cowell did with One Direction.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10August 9, 2025 3:05 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!