Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Macaulay Culkin says Home Alone 2 is better than the first

Because he makes more off of 2. He was paid a lot more, plus owns 5% of net profits and 15% of all merchandising for the second film.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 11August 8, 2025 11:25 PM

He’s right.

by Anonymousreply 1August 8, 2025 10:43 PM

I found it inexcusably cheap and boring

by Anonymousreply 2August 8, 2025 10:49 PM

r2 You never saw it.

by Anonymousreply 3August 8, 2025 10:53 PM

They're both great, but the "you've been smoochin' behind my back" scene gives the sequel the edge. I could have lived without Brenda Fricker, though.

by Anonymousreply 4August 8, 2025 10:55 PM

I like the New York one because Trump is in it.

by Anonymousreply 5August 8, 2025 11:00 PM

He's a whore.

And a closet case.

by Anonymousreply 6August 8, 2025 11:00 PM

R5 grow up.

Tim Curry alone makes the sequel better

by Anonymousreply 7August 8, 2025 11:01 PM

r6 Inaccurate

by Anonymousreply 8August 8, 2025 11:18 PM

R6 no he isn’t. Grow up.

by Anonymousreply 9August 8, 2025 11:19 PM

As a 90s baby I adored Home Alone 2. It’s one of the first movies I remember watching. I got a Talkboy as a Christmas gift the year after it came out and I loved playing with it. Then I grew up, watched both movies through more discerning adult eyes and realized the truth. The first Home Alone is superior and Home Alone 2 is just a knockoff inside the Plaza hotel. It’s still a good movie and I watch both every Christmas season.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10August 8, 2025 11:20 PM

R10 I find the opposite. I first thought the sequel was inferior, but I find it now to be better.

Maybe because the NYC pictured in the film really doesn't exist anymore. It is a wonderful time capsule of a pre-Bloomberg Manhattan.

by Anonymousreply 11August 8, 2025 11:25 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!