Helen Gurley Brown's 1970s Cosmo
My sister read it from cover to cover. The mag's message seemed schizophrenic: take charge of your life... be your own woman... you can have it all! Then on the cover would be a model with an inch of makeup and her tits hanging out.
Are women really nothing without a man?
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 6 | August 1, 2025 8:05 AM
|
It's not really about men, OP, at least not directly. Our society dictates what it means to be a woman who "has it all", and beauty/sex appeal is very much included.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | August 1, 2025 4:18 AM
|
Cosmo was full of sexy articles and quizzes (it’s editor was hired because she wrote the bestseller “Sex & the Single Girl”) so of course the covers were slutty.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | August 1, 2025 5:22 AM
|
"You can have it all" was 1970s feminist nonsense dogma. All it led to was a lot of burnt-out women retreating from the workplace and going back to being housewives. Nancy Pelosi, for example, had her family first THEN had a political career. And she didn't even ask for the latter.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | August 1, 2025 7:49 AM
|
I don’t think the 1970s Cosmopolitan had a You Can Have It All vibe. It was pitched at single women, not working mothers.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | August 1, 2025 8:05 AM
|