Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Superhero movies are hits again--but can DC and Marvel avoid the same mistakes?

Despite the wishes of some Dataloungers, as this writer points out, it's clear that BOTH "Superman" and "The Fantastic Four: First Steps" are box office successes, after so many recent misfires in the genre and the proclamation of its death. This analyst for The Guardian points out some good reasons for why these two are succeeding where other superhero movies in recent years have not done so well:

*They don't waste time with re-hashing origin stories. No one needs or really wants a large part of the movie wasted by seeing Krypton blow up again or Reed and Ben and the Storms get hit by cosmic rays.

*They have an entry-point for kids so the films are fun for them, and so they've got some lighthearted elements, and draw most of their plot elements and tone from the Silver Age of Comics (roughly 1955-1970), when comics were far less grim than they were in the 90s and 00s.

*They're both more-or-less stand-alone features. Unlike Thunderbolts or Captain America: Brave New World, you don't need to have watched multiple other movies or other TV series to know what's going on.

*They're not all trying to be as grandiose or cross-over-heavy as Avengers: Endgame, which cannot be easily replicated

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10August 1, 2025 5:13 PM

This genre is fun when it's done right. I haven't seen FF but Superman was definitely a reset for DC.

by Anonymousreply 1July 31, 2025 10:30 PM

This seems like a smart analysis to me.

It also seems like they need to stop making movies about very minor characters (like Madame Web, the Blue Beetle, Thunderbolts, etc.) since those are all disasters and stick with the big ones.

by Anonymousreply 2August 1, 2025 1:22 AM

…except this article is wrong (as much as The Guardian is about US culture)

Superman will do less than $600 million worldwide

Man of Steel did $670mm, without inflation

With inflation, that’s around $900 million depending on the calculation. 1/3 of the audience didn’t show up.

Fantastic Four is shaping up to be an even bigger box office disappointment.

by Anonymousreply 3August 1, 2025 10:26 AM

Superman will probably make it to $600 million, which will be just enough for it to be considered a "success."

Fantastic Four might hit $500 million.

The real test of the genre will be next year with the new Spider-Man and Avengers films. Both pretty much have to hit a billion at the box office, or they'll be branded flops and/or disappointments.

by Anonymousreply 4August 1, 2025 3:48 PM

Supergirl is out next year, too, which will show if Superman was a fluke or if Gunn's DCU has real staying power.

by Anonymousreply 5August 1, 2025 3:51 PM

None of the previous Fantastic Four movies were in the annals of great comic book movies.

They’re not that interesting.

by Anonymousreply 6August 1, 2025 4:03 PM

Superman will not reach $600 million, it comes out on digital in two weeks. Jurassic World comes out next week. 34 days each.

by Anonymousreply 7August 1, 2025 4:30 PM

In the post-pandemic era, $800M might be the new $1 billion. We've seen a noticeable drop in films crossing the billion-dollar threshold this decade. In 2019 alone, nine movies hit that mark, while from 2020 to 2025, only ten have reached it in total.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 8August 1, 2025 4:46 PM

[quote]With inflation, that’s around $900 million depending on the calculation.

Fantastic Four and Superman are successes based on what’s actually possible [italic]right now,[/italic] in that genre. So not in 2013, not in 1970, but right now with this particular movie going public.

The world has changed. Same with movies. Context matters.

And as for “a third of the audience didn’t show up”? That assumes the exact same audience exists, behaves the same, and has the same reasons to show up which it doesn’t, and hasn’t for years. Publications and studios are very much aware of this.

by Anonymousreply 9August 1, 2025 5:13 PM

Dear r8

Stop gaslighting

SNWH did 1.9 billion WITHOUT China.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10August 1, 2025 5:13 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!