Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Is Bonfire of the Vanities an entertaining read?

The only Wolfe I’ve read is The Right Stuff. (And some magazine articles.)

I hated the ‘80s but by today’s standards it was pretty tame! And I was in my 20s, on one end of the curve of my life, back then. Now, I’m on the other end of the curve and thinking back on that time before the digital “revolution” and before Fox News, and feeling a bit nostalgic for that vanished world.

So am considering reading what many consider the quintessential 80s novel.

Does it suck? I’ve read some reviews to indicate it does. I’m not talking about De Palma’s cinematic abortion by the way.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 30July 31, 2025 10:20 PM

I should mention I tried to read The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test but it was fucking exhausting.

by Anonymousreply 1July 31, 2025 2:59 PM

I enjoyed it a lot, first in installments in 'Rolling Stone' magazine, then the book. I'm glad I didn't see the movie first, because that would have ruined the book since the main actors cast were all wrong.

by Anonymousreply 2July 31, 2025 2:59 PM

It’s worth reading. As is A Man in Full.

by Anonymousreply 3July 31, 2025 3:01 PM

Very entertaining read but the book falls apart at the end. Wolfe's novels all have that issue; some of them -- like I Am Charlotte Simmons -- have many others, too.

by Anonymousreply 4July 31, 2025 3:01 PM

Read the book, skip the disaster of a movie, but read the book about the making of the disaster of a movie, "The Devil's Candy: The Bonfire of the Vanities Goes to Hollywood."

by Anonymousreply 5July 31, 2025 3:05 PM

It’s a great read. Stay away from the film version

I actually really love I Am Charlotte Simmons, faults and all.

by Anonymousreply 6July 31, 2025 3:09 PM

I thought the movie had some good bits, and overall was not a complete disaster.

by Anonymousreply 7July 31, 2025 3:13 PM

It's a piece of shit written by a racist southern conservative who thinks he is above it all - wall streeters, blacks and especially LIBERALS.

by Anonymousreply 8July 31, 2025 3:24 PM

I really enjoyed it. I remember when it was serialized in Rolling Stone but it didn’t seem to take off like they had hoped.

by Anonymousreply 9July 31, 2025 3:31 PM

[Quote] but read the book about the making of the disaster of a movie, "The Devil's Candy: The Bonfire of the Vanities Goes to Hollywood."

I did! Great book.

R8 that’s one of the things I was worried about — whether Wolfe’d deep conservatism harshes the read. But you’re the only person to bring up that criticism so for most it didn’t?

by Anonymousreply 10July 31, 2025 3:37 PM

^^^ Wolfe’s

by Anonymousreply 11July 31, 2025 3:37 PM

"Entertaining read" is the perfect description of this book.

by Anonymousreply 12July 31, 2025 3:41 PM

Shummun sez, "Skip the film.

by Anonymousreply 13July 31, 2025 3:44 PM

I enjoyed it very much and did not feel that it was infused with conservatism.

by Anonymousreply 14July 31, 2025 4:42 PM

It's breezy and often diverting, quite smart and funny at times. It's problem is that the book is 690 pages and could have been very better at 290 pages. The courtroom drama is a necessary part, but that was where it wound way too long and out of his depth, the spark of momentum was gone (replaced by nothing better.)

by Anonymousreply 15July 31, 2025 4:48 PM

I am re-reading BOTV on the beach this summer, then come "The Devils Candy"

Bonfire is an entertaining read; I never took the book seriously. I knew so many Wall Street people like them in the 80s.

To R1, agree with the Electric Kool-Aid Book, it was fucking exhausting. I believe I threw it in the firepit years ago. I didn't like it-it burned well though.

by Anonymousreply 16July 31, 2025 6:23 PM

It's a good, fun read, OP. Avoid the movie.

by Anonymousreply 17July 31, 2025 6:48 PM

Smart and funny. Read it.

by Anonymousreply 18July 31, 2025 7:22 PM

I ADORED it! Wolfe put those uppity UES bitches in their place. Social x-rays!

by Anonymousreply 19July 31, 2025 7:25 PM

Ok you bitches have convinced me. As soon as I’m done with the Kellow book on Sue Mengers, I’ll jump on the “Bonfire.”

by Anonymousreply 20July 31, 2025 7:49 PM

Well, it's no "The Kandy-Kolored Tangerine-Flake Streamline Baby" but it is very good.

by Anonymousreply 21July 31, 2025 7:53 PM

I read it last year and wasn't impressed. It's not as witty and insightful as it thinks it is. The ending felt very rushed and thrown together.

by Anonymousreply 22July 31, 2025 8:09 PM

I read it long ago. It was a grind. There wasn’t a single pleasant character and reading about awful people page after page was depressing. Never wanted to see the movie but I could tell it was hilariously miscast.

I also read Electric Kool-aid and Tangerine Flake (do not remember a single thing about that one). But The Right Stuff? That book I remember vividly and of course the movie was really well done. I still have the book because it was so much better than his other ones.

by Anonymousreply 23July 31, 2025 8:29 PM

I concur with the prevailing opinion: a very entertaining and quick read. The 700 pages go by fast.

And yes about EKAT. I don't think the pranksters had left the California desert before I put it down.

by Anonymousreply 24July 31, 2025 8:31 PM

I tried to read it several times after it came out. Couldn’t get into it…and I wanted to.

by Anonymousreply 25July 31, 2025 8:41 PM

very 80s and very entertaining

by Anonymousreply 26July 31, 2025 9:41 PM

I read it once, many years ago. I don't even remember the plot. I never had an urge to read it again. Never saw the movie either.

That is all.

by Anonymousreply 27July 31, 2025 10:06 PM

It was a book that everyone was reading at the time, too. The movie was horribly cast—while reading the book I pictured Michael Douglas in the lead role. Tom Hanks was a terrible choice.

by Anonymousreply 28July 31, 2025 10:10 PM

William Hurt should have played the lead!

by Anonymousreply 29July 31, 2025 10:19 PM

Loved it when I read it back in the day but it does fizzle out by the end as the upthread poster said. Same with A Man in Full which I loved even more (until the end).

by Anonymousreply 30July 31, 2025 10:20 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!