Ethan Hawke steals a role from a short actor in Lorenz Hart biopic Blue Moon
Hart was five feet tall. Ethan Hawke is 5’10. They can use camera tricks to make him look short, but it doesn’t work when any of the shots show his arms because his arms are still proportionate to his actual height.
He looks like ET the Extraterrestrial.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 22 | July 30, 2025 3:02 AM
|
Was Peter Dinklage not available???
by Anonymous | reply 1 | July 29, 2025 8:16 PM
|
I understand what you mean and I do think you have a point, but I don’t like putting restrictions on directors.
As soon as I saw Richard Linklater’s name I knew why he would rather work with Hawks than someone he’s less familiar with.
This reminds me of that Todd Haynes bomb from 8-10 years ago when he cast Julianne Moore as a deaf person instead of giving Marlee Matlin a job. I get it, but I still think they should be allowed to choose who they’re most comfortable with.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | July 29, 2025 8:20 PM
|
From Dazed and Confused to Rodgers and Hart.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | July 29, 2025 9:54 PM
|
You’re right about that arms… they should have chopped them off, shaved them down, then reattached.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | July 29, 2025 9:56 PM
|
Didn't know about this film, but the trailer looks quite good.
I'll have to make a point of seeing it.
I wasn't especially bothered by Ethan Hawk's height by what I saw in the trailer.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | July 29, 2025 10:02 PM
|
[quote]Who's Lorenz Hart?—Everybody under 85
Not everybody on DL under 85. Your clever remark is actually quite stupid.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | July 29, 2025 10:06 PM
|
Is Richard LInklater easing out of the closet? He's doing this, he's doing the Merrily We Roll Along Movie (with Beanie and Ben Platt) and then he did the most openly homoerotic movie of the last 20 years - Everybody Wants Some.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | July 29, 2025 10:30 PM
|
Hawk and Scott are about 6 or 7 years apart, which Hart and Rogers also were.
But Hawk and Scott are older than Hart and Rodgers were at the time of Oklahoma!--they're both @ 7 or 8 years older.
It doesn't matter but it would be more interesting to me to have an actor Hart's size play it, who resembles Hart. Then I wouldn't have to be thinking about how they made Hawk look short or how they shaved his hair back or dyed it. He kind of reminds me here of Jose Ferrer in Moulin Rouge. (Not the Nicole Kidman Moulin Rouge.)
by Anonymous | reply 9 | July 29, 2025 10:35 PM
|
If you’ve seen “Words and Music” with Mickey Rooney playing Hart, you’ll understand why the actor’s height should not be the primary consideration!
by Anonymous | reply 10 | July 29, 2025 10:39 PM
|
Even though I know who Hart was, I have no idea of what he looked like. Most people don't.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | July 29, 2025 10:43 PM
|
[quote]reminds me here of Jose Ferrer in Moulin Rouge. (Not the Nicole Kidman Moulin Rouge.)
The one with the hit song.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 13 | July 29, 2025 10:46 PM
|
Sung by Zsa Zsa Gabor in the film (or someone, while Zsa Zsa pretended to sing).
by Anonymous | reply 14 | July 29, 2025 10:53 PM
|
So should they have gotten a short, gay, Jewish actor for the part?
by Anonymous | reply 15 | July 29, 2025 10:58 PM
|
Armin Shimerman could have easily played the part 35 years ago.
He Jewish and short, but now he's 75 years old.
Shimerman is best remembered for playing Quark on Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 16 | July 30, 2025 12:33 AM
|
Johnny Galecki could have played it. 5' 5", looks something like Hart, and he's younger than Hawk. Hart died at 48; J. G. is 50.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | July 30, 2025 12:48 AM
|
[quote]Was Peter Dinklage not available???
Dinklage is 4' 5". That's in itself quite a difference from 5' 0".
by Anonymous | reply 19 | July 30, 2025 12:55 AM
|
R17 We should tell the younger folks that Hart is on the left and Rodgers is on the right in that photo. A first guess might assume the opposite.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | July 30, 2025 2:49 AM
|
[quote] Johnny Galecki could have played it.
R18 He definitely would have been a good choice physically. He even has a furrowed brow like Hart had. He’s also a musician. However, I think Galecki has essentially retired on his many millions of dollars in salary from “The Big Bang Theory.”
by Anonymous | reply 21 | July 30, 2025 2:58 AM
|
[quote]A first guess might assume the opposite.
Which I assume is intentional, r20.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | July 30, 2025 3:02 AM
|