Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Questions for DL’s legal experts (re Cuomo sexual harassment cases)

I was just reading the story in today’s NY Times about how the state reached a settlement with one of Andrew Cuomo’s accusers. I realize how confusing I find the law. I have questions.

> This settlement includes no admission of guilt or wrongdoing on the part of either Cuomo or New York State. If that’s the case, on what basis is the claimant being awarded close to half a million dollars? I mean, if no one has done anything wrong, why is she winning this financial settlement?

> I understand I’m probably just asking the same question in a different way. But I’m really disturbed by this situation. If the state is agreeing to pay Brittany Commisso $450,000, doesn’t that mean she has suffered some egregious behavior? Why else would she be getting this deal? If this money is not compensation for what Cuomo did to her, precisely WHAT is she being paid for?

> Why are we, NYS taxpayers, on the hook for almost half a million dollars? Shouldn’t Cuomo be liable for this restitution? After all, he’s the one who groped her and created a hostile work environment for her and numerous other women.

> There is another statement in the article that jumped out at me as utterly bizarre:

“She [Ms. Commisso] also agreed not to seek employment with the executive chamber through 2030 [as part of this settlement].”

Why? Why are HER employment opportunities being restricted? What has SHE done wrong? She has not been accused of any crime in this case.

> Last question.

“…he [Cuomo] continues to vehemently deny any sexual misconduct, despite findings from the New York State attorney general, the State Assembly and the U.S. Department of Justice.”

If the AG, the Assembly, and the DOJ all found him guilty of sexual misconduct, why wasn’t he brought to trial? Why did judges dismiss criminal charges? After all, 13 women, I believe, brought credible charges against him. Is it not suspicious that he avoided trial?

Forgive me if my questions seem ignorant but for the life of me I cannot understand how he not only gets away with all of this but how many of my fellow New Yorkers think that he deserves to be our mayor. It’s mind boggling.

Thank you.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 2July 20, 2025 5:17 PM

(Just realizing I misused the word “guilty.” I know the AG, the Assembly, and the DOJ didn’t find him guilty. But they found ample evidence of his misconduct.)

by Anonymousreply 1July 20, 2025 4:27 PM

OP, your confusion isn't a reflection on you. It's legal bullshit. They would say it's more beneficial for all parties and cheaper to settle. The fact that he and NY state can get away with saying no one is culpable is part of the bargaining chip of the settlement--a condition. Why her job opportunities are being limited is another example of a condition they're forcing her to comply with, in order for her to get the money.

As for why any New Yorker would want this pig as mayor, the answer is they mostly don't, which is why he was beaten in the primary and why he's behind Mamdani in the polls.

by Anonymousreply 2July 20, 2025 5:17 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!