This film loomed large in my childhood because my mom recalled seeing it with her boyfriend at a drive-in when she was in high school, and it absolutely horrified her. She said it was the scariest movie she'd ever seen. I loved horror films from a young age and saw it sometime as an adolescent. It really appealed to me because it was focused around a boy roughly my age, and the whole thing was so nightmarish and surreal. I think it is easily one of the most unique horror movies of the 1970s. The Tall Man's shapeshifting into the "Lady in Lavender" is especially disturbing.
It is good
by Anonymous | reply 1 | July 20, 2025 5:36 AM |
It is a film riddled with idiosyncrasies that somehow manage to coalesce into a total nightmare on film. It really captures the way in which kids/young adults view the world, and how they pick up on the strangeness of things that often go unnoticed by the adults around them. It's peculiar to the extreme, yet there is still a very human element at its core in the relationship between the two brothers. I've never seen anything else like it.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | July 20, 2025 5:46 AM |
A truly sui generis horror film. Bona fide classic. It holds up.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | July 20, 2025 11:00 AM |
Great soundtrack, too! Very eerie and spooky.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | July 20, 2025 11:06 AM |
Watched it again recently, after seeing it like 100 times, and it’s truly a disturbing, horrifying film mixed with a fair dose of silliness and levity. I was 12 when it came out, and it freaked me out big time. Angus Scrimm was the ultimate boogeyman. Truly scary as fuck moments like the first time you see the silver sphere go flying, the tall man chasing Mike through the morgue, and showing up at his house twice, once at his front door, and then crashing through the window. Not to mention the ending and the dwarves crashing through the mirror at Mike. The sequels got progressively worse, and didn’t have the atmosphere, darkness and dread of the first one.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | July 20, 2025 12:24 PM |
What's this movie about?
by Anonymous | reply 6 | July 20, 2025 12:28 PM |
Is this the one with the orbs?
by Anonymous | reply 7 | July 20, 2025 1:03 PM |
[quote]What's this movie about?
About 90 minutes.
Absolute staple on HBO in the early 80's.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | July 20, 2025 1:06 PM |
R6 IMDb is your friend.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | July 20, 2025 1:18 PM |
I didn't know this before, but Phantasm was apparently filmed intermittently over the course of an entire year. It really was a homegrown project for Don Coscarelli, and his family assisted the production in numerous ways (his mother even made some of the costumes). I'm sure this contributed to some of the weirdness/disjointedness of it all, but in the end, the film works wonderfully in its own bizarre way.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | July 20, 2025 3:51 PM |
R10 I’ve heard this too. But it got put together in a great way for such a low budget. The last shot of Scrimm in the mirror at the very end you can tell his hair is shorter than the rest of the movie.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | July 20, 2025 4:10 PM |
I prefer "O Fantasma" (2000.) Plus, you get an explicit blowjob.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | July 20, 2025 4:14 PM |
The silver ball was a really cool original addition to the horror movie world.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | July 20, 2025 4:16 PM |
I absolutely consider this to be one of the best horror movies, right up there with Candyman and Hellraiser. I am going to have to watch it tonight, thanks OP!
by Anonymous | reply 14 | July 20, 2025 4:32 PM |
Michael Baldwin grew up to be a pretty handsome man. I don't know what he looks like these days, but he was pretty hot in the '90s.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | July 20, 2025 8:26 PM |
Was Angus Scrimm family? Never married, no children. Worked as a journalist and wrote liner notes at Capitol Records prior to becoming an actor (he even won a Grammy for his liner note contributions to an album in 1974). A lifelong bachelor, or possibly one of us?
by Anonymous | reply 16 | July 20, 2025 8:45 PM |
R4 I think it's one of the most underrated original scores for a horror film I can think of. Unforgettable. It has a similar sound to the music you hear in a lot of Italian horror films ("The Beyond" comes to mind).
by Anonymous | reply 17 | July 20, 2025 9:07 PM |
Scared the absolute shit out of me as a kid.
I saw it again about five years ago abs it still creeped me the fuck out.
And I gate that their friend was killed and turned into one of those zombie things
by Anonymous | reply 18 | July 20, 2025 10:44 PM |
What about the sequels? Do they hold up? Worth watching if you’ve only seen the first one?
by Anonymous | reply 19 | July 20, 2025 11:42 PM |
R19 the first sequel is closest in style and atmosphere to the original, but it’s just so so. Coscarelli couldn’t get it made without a bigger name for Mike, so James Le Gros was cast. A. Michael Baldwin held no grudges and came back for 3-5. Part 2 just didn’t have that low budget, renegade style of filmmaking that 1 did, but at least it took place in a new funeral parlor and graveyard. Once they left the funeral parlors and graveyards for the rest of them, it just wasn’t the same. I barely remember 3-5, just a few bits and pieces. 3-5 are worth watching I guess if you have some time to kill and so you can say you saw all of them. But I’d stick with 1 and 2.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | July 20, 2025 11:59 PM |
Sounds like Reggie is not long for this world.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | July 21, 2025 12:48 AM |
This thread got me to watch it again tonight. It’s included with an Amazon Prime subscription among other platforms.
That house has been used in so many movies.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | July 21, 2025 2:27 AM |
R22 yes, the Dunsmuir House. It was famously featured in Burnt Offerings a couple of years before Phantasm was released
by Anonymous | reply 23 | July 21, 2025 3:28 AM |