Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Why Kate Middleton and King Charles’ ‘Simmering Tensions’ Just Exploded in Public

Kate Middleton’s decision to cancel an appearance in the Royal Ascot carriage procession, citing “slightly vague” reasons of “balance,” has highlighted simmering tensions with King Charles over their differing priorities.

One friend of Prince William and Kate insisted the couple were right to prioritize Kate’s health, and said that if she was feeling unwell it was absurd to expect her to be paraded in front of the public on a boiling hot summer day, with little shade or air conditioning.

However, another source said that the late queen, who adored horse racing and considered attending the Ascot races one of the few truly fun public engagements she was obliged to carry out, would have been affronted that someone who had accepted the “great honor of a coveted place in the carriage procession” could fail to show up at the last minute.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 12June 22, 2025 3:34 AM

Another source pointed out that Kate and William are simply not very interested in horse racing, and there is a suspicion in some quarters that had Wednesday’s event been something she really loved, such as Wimbledon, she might have turned up.

Her office has not given a specific reason for her decision not to go to Ascot. It has not, for example, fallen back on the trusty excuse of a severe cold, instead briefing media that Kate was “disappointed” not to go but wanted to find the right “balance” in her return to full-time royal duties.

Asked how Charles would have seen Kate’s last-minute cancellation, a friend of the king said: “Charles is a very thoughtful and considerate man. He is going through cancer himself so he will be entirely understanding. He knows all about good days and bad days, physically and mentally.”

Asked whether the incident highlighted a difference between how William and Kate and Charles and Camilla approach their jobs, the source said, “Charles has been very insistent that the show must go on, come hell or high water. Kate and William tackle their public duties differently, which is their privilege, for now. Charles has been very clear that he supports their decisions.”

However, another source, a former royal staffer, was more skeptical about the circumstances of Kate’s no-show Wednesday, telling the Daily Beast: “There is a perception in some quarters that Kate just doesn’t like racing and so didn’t make the effort. That is probably not fair, but you have to wonder if she would have missed Wimbledon, which she adores.

“I am sure she was genuinely unable to come, yet the last-minute nature of the way it was announced makes the king look disrespected. Would she have dared miss Ascot at a moment’s notice when the queen was alive? Her late Majesty would have been not best pleased to have the great honor of a coveted place in the carriage procession rejected an hour before kickoff on slightly vague grounds.

“Clearly, Kate wasn’t feeling up to it, but there is no denying that the whole affair was badly handled. You can’t blame their office as they are the last to know, William and Kate make their own decisions on their own time, which is another source of frustration to everyone else trying to steer the tanker. They pulled the plug at the last minute.

“It’s interesting that briefing is now coming out of the palace saying that the racecourse made a bureaucratic error by publishing the carriage list with her in it, but that doesn’t change the fact that her team didn’t announce she wasn’t coming until late in the day.”

Kate’s no-show clearly caught everyone by surprise, including close friends who had been invited to join them in the royal box, including Thomas van Straubenzee, a godfather to their daughter, Princess Charlotte, Eton friend James Meade, and amateur jockey and businessman Sam Waley-Cohen.

William looked markedly somber on arrival but cheered up later in the day when he was photographed having a drink with his pals.

by Anonymousreply 1June 21, 2025 10:34 PM

I can't remember where I read it but it was this week and a credible publication: she never intended to go. Her inclusion on the carriage list that day was an error that nobody caught.

by Anonymousreply 2June 21, 2025 10:43 PM

So, essentially, a bored royal reporter desperate to write something, anything, this week, concocted a completely fictitious trauma based on the fact that Elizabeth II loved horses and horse races and Kate pretty much doesn't share that same passion, and therefore ... well, nothing at all really, but you gotta throw some shit on the page, cause, well no reason at all really, but hell, just do it.

by Anonymousreply 3June 21, 2025 10:45 PM

Also one writing for a publication... in a jam, so to speak.

by Anonymousreply 4June 21, 2025 10:46 PM

[quote] I can't remember where I read it but it was this week and a credible publication: she never intended to go. Her inclusion on the carriage list that day was an error that nobody caught.

Not according to this other Daily Beast article on the story:

[italic]Prince William and Princess Kate Middleton issued a new photo of William on Saturday, his 43rd birthday, but otherwise hid themselves away from public view as Kate “recalibrates her entire life” after a bruising week in which she cancelled a high-profile public appearance.

Kate’s team cited her need to find “balance” as she recovers from cancer when she failed to appear at the iconic carriage ride at Royal Ascot races on Wednesday alongside the king.

[bold]By pulling out of such a high-profile event just over an hour before she was due to appear, Kate sowed panic and confusion among royal staff,[/bold] although press reports in the United Kingdom have largely played down the drama.

Multiple sources told The Daily Beast they expected Kate to dramatically scale back her public appearances for the rest of the year and instead increase her online and digital footprint, remotely supporting causes close to her heart.[/italic]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 5June 21, 2025 10:48 PM

Such BS. It was one of the hottest (if not the hottest) days of the year.

I'll let AI do the talking:

[QUOTE]Yes, cancer survivors can be more susceptible to heat. Cancer treatments, like chemotherapy and radiation, can make the skin more sensitive to the sun and heat. Additionally, some cancer treatments can affect the body's ability to regulate temperature, potentially leading to dehydration or other heat-related illnesses.

Also, she might very well likely be going through premature menopause. Both chemotherapy and radiation treatments, particularly if targeted to the pelvic region, can cause it. Heat and sunlight can actually precipitate hot flashes. No menopausal woman in her right mind would want to spend a hot afternoon in the beating sun.

by Anonymousreply 6June 21, 2025 11:00 PM

Danger, gurl. Sausage fingers ahead.

Let’s hear oh so annoying Brits deal with this! ;)

by Anonymousreply 7June 21, 2025 11:03 PM

My favorite thing about the UK is that, no matter how picayune the action, there is someone thisclose to the Palace or the relevant royal with a fulsome explanation.

That’s entertainment!

by Anonymousreply 8June 21, 2025 11:06 PM

No one cheats a van Straubenzee out of free booze & food!

by Anonymousreply 9June 21, 2025 11:09 PM

This is such a non-story. A nothingburger if you will!

by Anonymousreply 10June 21, 2025 11:31 PM

I’m surprised we don’t have breathless coverage of the bowel habits of these nobodies.

by Anonymousreply 11June 22, 2025 12:05 AM

[quote] I’m surprised we don’t have breathless coverage of the bowel habits of these nobodies.

I'm willing to be Camilla's tampon!

by Anonymousreply 12June 22, 2025 3:34 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!