Why didn't this story get more attention?
Kamala Won. Bombshell report claims voting machines were tampered with before 2024
by Anonymous | reply 34 | June 15, 2025 12:12 PM |
Kamala Harris won the U.S. elections: Bombshell report claims voting machines were tampered with before 2024: A new report is stirring fresh debate about the outcome of the 2024 U.S. presidential election, claiming that voting machines were secretly altered before ballots were even cast. The bombshell allegation raises a serious question: Did Kamala Harris actually win the 2024 election?
In Rockland County, New York, several voters testified under oath that their ballots didn’t match the official results. Senate candidate Diane Sare reportedly lost votes in precinct after precinct:
In one district, 9 voters claimed they voted for Sare, but only 5 votes were recorded.
In another, 5 voters swore they supported her, but only 3 votes appeared.
It wasn’t just third-party candidates who saw odd results. In multiple Democratic-leaning areas, Kamala Harris’s name was reportedly missing from the top of the ballot entirely. Voters said they couldn’t even find her name to select. These same areas had high support for Democrats like Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, yet Harris received zero votes—a statistical anomaly that defies traditional voting patterns.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | June 14, 2025 11:21 PM |
DJT was the only repug to win all the swing states in the history of the USA. He was the only repug in decades to win the popular vote - despite being INCREDIBLY unpopular among voters across party lines - and loosing votes since the last election (which he lost). The richest man in the world (and in world history for that matter) owned the satellites that tallied the votes, that mysteriously had decayed orbits and crashed to the Earth just after the election....nothing wrong here folks - move along - nothing to see LOL
by Anonymous | reply 2 | June 14, 2025 11:26 PM |
Kamala lost. She was a terrible candidate. Her political future is done. She was inauthentic, contrived, and ill-prepared. I am definitely not a Trumper, but for the love of all that is good, accept that she and Walz were a terrible duo.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | June 14, 2025 11:51 PM |
Jill Stein, is that you at r3?
by Anonymous | reply 4 | June 14, 2025 11:56 PM |
I felt that.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | June 15, 2025 12:57 AM |
R2 That's what I thought Elon was saying when he said DJT wouldn't have won without me. Like it was rigged.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | June 15, 2025 12:58 AM |
She’ll probably win in California. They love stupid people.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | June 15, 2025 3:19 AM |
Yes they need stupid people to govern a state or 40 million people.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | June 15, 2025 3:23 AM |
Of*
by Anonymous | reply 10 | June 15, 2025 3:24 AM |
We knew when DJT said “we’ve got the votes” before the election.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | June 15, 2025 4:06 AM |
R2 Satellites tally the votes in elections?
BlueAnon exists...
by Anonymous | reply 12 | June 15, 2025 4:12 AM |
I’m only now believing this
by Anonymous | reply 13 | June 15, 2025 4:12 AM |
R3 likes to eat raw shrimp. Enough said!
by Anonymous | reply 14 | June 15, 2025 4:47 AM |
R7 that poster made a mistake, but he still clearly cheated.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | June 15, 2025 4:59 AM |
Compare the turnout for Drump's DC Military parade to any big city protest, and tell me 10 million people chose to stay home rather than vote against Dump.
NO. FUCKING. WAY!!!
by Anonymous | reply 16 | June 15, 2025 5:19 AM |
Jill Biden handed the world, let alone the election, to Trump.
May she never know a proper bowel movement.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | June 15, 2025 5:30 AM |
"DJT was the only repug to win all the swing states"
After having done nothing to woo them, amidst yuge anti-Trump sentiment. His tired, desperate campaign focused on his far right, deplorable Magat haters. Kamala was out-raising him 5 times over.
It was all brushed-off as, "Registered voters ultimately decided not to vote".
by Anonymous | reply 18 | June 15, 2025 5:50 AM |
She lost. The end.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | June 15, 2025 5:52 AM |
Harris’s internal polling had her losing.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | June 15, 2025 5:57 AM |
No she won. I waved signs for in my town and the people waving and honking in support was crazy. Thousands of people lined up for hours in the Georgia to see her speak. She whipped his ass in the debate and early voting by Democrats broke records. Anecdotally, I know so many Republicans who voted for Kamala or didn't vote for president. There's no way Kamala lost Georgia
by Anonymous | reply 21 | June 15, 2025 6:01 AM |
Dunno what this Economic Times is, but the actual case alleges that the votes for Kirsten Gillibrand were inflated and her independent rival, Diane Sare, should have got more votes according to sworn testimonies by voters in the district.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | June 15, 2025 6:01 AM |
We need a national standard with paper ballots and get rid of the seccret ballot. Abraham Lincoln was not elected by secret ballot. The first fruits of the adoption of the secret ballot was Jim Crow.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | June 15, 2025 6:13 AM |
It's shocking to me that anybody would call Harris "stupid" when there isn't a single Republican that could pass a sixth grade civics test.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | June 15, 2025 6:15 AM |
I'll have to read more about it, r22, but I think the case used some affidavits of miscounting using a non-presidential race (a Senate race) precisely IN ORDER that the judge would feel confident to order a complete recount. I think that many people have suspicions that the presidential votes were tampered by quite a bit more than those Senate results, but a presidential recount effort would look like sour grapes and a very partisan effort. This looks like an innocent "oh wow, some anomalous results there, need checking out by hand recounts". IF presidential counts are way off, suddenly there will be more ammunition to order hand recounts in other counties and states.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | June 15, 2025 6:17 AM |
Musk's erase-erase computer program simply targeted large, diverse metropolitan areas. People were not waiting for hours to re-hire the elderly felon trying to avoid bankruptcy and prison. His first administration was a travesty of scandal, firings, impeachment, illegality, hate and inertia.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | June 15, 2025 6:25 AM |
Early voting was insane everywhere. That alone put her over the top.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | June 15, 2025 6:46 AM |
So, r26, the people who brought the case are using the example of alleged inflated and false votes for a Democratic Senate candidate to show that the Democratic presidential candidate allegedly had her votes tampered with. OK.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | June 15, 2025 7:28 AM |
r28, you've misread the articles about the bringers of the suit, SMART elections. Here is that organization's full complaint:
"A formal complaint alleged that more voters submitted sworn affidavits claiming they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare than were recorded and certified by the Rockland County Board of Elections, raising questions about the official results. The complaint also points to several statistical anomalies in the presidential election returns, including districts where hundreds of voters selected Democratic Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand, yet not a single vote was recorded for Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Kamala Harris".
by Anonymous | reply 29 | June 15, 2025 7:37 AM |
Strictly anecdotal: my absentee ballot mailed from Dublin, Ireland, by registered post on Sept. 28, 2024, was still "making its way through the system" in Virginia on Election Day six weeks later. It arrived in the U.S. within one day but got stuck somewhere and was never processed. I filed a complaint with USPS but never received a satisfactory response. Shenanigans?
by Anonymous | reply 30 | June 15, 2025 7:41 AM |
R29, what you quote in fact states that Diane Sare's vote tally was suspiciously low and Gillibrand's vote was inflated. If you'd read more from the group you'd be aware that their position is that Harris's low vote tally is evidence that Gillibrand's vote was inflated. They are not saying that Gillibrand's high vote means Harris's was deliberately suppressed. They are not questioning the presidential vote but the Senate vote.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | June 15, 2025 8:12 AM |
Tick tock boom!
by Anonymous | reply 32 | June 15, 2025 9:07 AM |
R24 That's why it's not worthy of a response.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | June 15, 2025 9:14 AM |
R15 I was only pointing out the mistake, not making a statement about cheating by DJT. The end of his presidency can’t come soon enough for me…by whatever means. And to be fair, I don’t know which states were considered swing in the 1984 election.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | June 15, 2025 12:12 PM |