Supreme Court Judge Orders Full Hand Recount in New York County After 2024 Ballot Shows Zero Votes for Harris

Interesting, but, if true, this would mean that the election was rigged so that the Democratic Senate candidate, Kirsten Gillibrand, would win.

Something is up here

🎶 I know there’s something going on

DJT will shoot this down and stay in office, but history will tell the story.

The same people who were insisting last summer that the "assassination" attempt was not staged are the same people now insisting the election wasn't rigged.

Ciincidence?

R4 and r5, if you made the slightest effort to find out the facts of this case, the allegation seems to be that the votes for Kirsten Gillibrand were inflated.

R6: Donald Trump is a convicted felon. If he had not won the election in 2024, there was a good chance he'd end up in jail.

FYI: desperate people do desperate shit. God only knows what shenanigans Trump and Elmo's $275 million did to keep his fat, white entitled ass out of jail.

What felonies was Trump convicted of, r7? People often mention them but no one can quite relate just what his crimes were. This implies that they weren't anything that would have landed him in jail.

Now a recount?

It's too late now. Why did this take so long?

Trump would not have wound up in jail over his N.Y. convictions. However, he might have for his federal crimes.

R6 - How do you come to the conclusion that there were votes for Hillebrand and not that they restricted or invalidated the vote for Harris?

If Eileen did something, she should be deported.

R12, if you made the effort to read the article you would have noticed that the claim is that Gillibrand's rival for the Senate seat, Diane Sare, received fewer votes than the number of sworn testimonies that said they voted for her. In other words, Gillibrand's vote count was suspiciously high and Sare's vote unaccountably low. This suspicion is backed by low levels of Democrat support in those counties, as reflected in the low votes for Harris. Gillibrand's vote is unaccountably high.

R8 - here's an AP link to an article listing the 34 felony charges on which DJT was convicted.

Where do you get your news? Do you know what Google is?

[Quote] This implies that they weren't anything that would have landed him in jail.

The only reason people convicted of these felonies don’t generally go to jail is because people who commit white collar crimes aren’t sent to jail.

R14 - "there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely,” - no one is assuming that the independent candidate would somehow be a state senator.

I can read between the lines of your post on this thread - you're a conservative Trumper. What they are questioning is how people who voted for Gillibrand did not cast a vote for President or did not vote for Harris.

And stop with your bullshit "if you read the article" - we read it all, but you and your twisted mind came to the conclusion of Dem vote tampering.

Something is rotten in Rockland. Again.

[R14] wow, cool story bro. The allegation is that it is HIGHLY UNUSUAL for a Democrat to vote for the Democratic nominee for Governor, but not also cast a vote for the Democratic nominee for President. In that one district noted above, Gillibrand got around nine hundred votes, but only two of those voters voted for Kamala Harris for President?! That's very sus. The allegation seems to indicate that Harris's votes were not counted or deleted somehow. Yikes.

[quote]What felonies was Trump convicted of, [R7]? People often mention them but no one can quite relate just what his crimes were. This implies that they weren't anything that would have landed him in jail.

Are you retarded?

May this recount be the first of many.

I’m glad the Marijuana Herald is on the trail of this story. I imagine their reporters, like Woodward and Bernstein in the car driving around DC, except the car is completely filled with smoke, veering left and right ….

R19, the allegation is that Gillibrand's votes for Senator (not governor) are suspect and possibly inflated.

To quote from the article [quote]“There is clear evidence that the senate results are incorrect

And [quote]The lawsuit alleges that dozens of voters in Rockland County reported voting for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare, yet the official tally recorded fewer votes than expected.

In other words, according to this lawsuit, Gillibrand's rival for Senate, Diane Sare, should have got more votes, while the Senate results for the district are incorrect. The votes for Harris are not considered suspect but as accurate and are being used as a Democratic benchmark to show that Gillibrand's votes are inflated.

For what it's worth, I think the people bringing this claim are claim are cranks, but the judge seems to think that there is merit to the allegations.

Apologies for the quotes not showing clearly in r23. Here are the quotes from OP's article that show the allegations in this case believe that Gillibrand's Senate votes were inflated.

[quote]“There is clear evidence that the senate results are incorrect

And

[quote]The lawsuit alleges that dozens of voters in Rockland County reported voting for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare, yet the official tally recorded fewer votes than expected.