The Machines Were Changed Before the 2024 Election
A private lab quietly altered voting machines used across the U.S. Then it vanished.
"In 2024, voters in Rockland County, NY, filed sworn legal affidavits claiming they had voted for independent Senate candidate Diane Sare. But the machines told a different story. In one district, nine people said they voted for her. The machines recorded five. In another, five claimed to vote for her but only three were officially counted by the machines. At the same time, In districts where voters clearly favored Democrats (evident by strong support for democratic Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand) Kamala Harris’s name either underperformed or seemed to disappear from the top of the ballot completely. They’d found that in some of the counties people where voted overwhelmingly for the Democratic candidate Kirsten, Kamala Harris somehow got no votes at all. At the same time, Donald Trump raked in more than 750,000 votes above what Republican Senate candidates received on the exact same ballots. That would mean 750k people voted for him & skipped the rest of the Republicans on the same ballot. That kind of pattern doesn’t scream voter preference. It whispers something went wrong in the vote count itself. That’s not split-ticket voting. That’s a mathematical anomaly."
"At the center of it all: missing votes, statistical anomalies, and a federally accredited testing lab called Pro V&V, whose seal of approval may be worth less than the paper it’s rubber-stamped on."
"Software changes are not supposed to be considered minor. But Pro V&V approved them anyway without full testing, without public oversight, without explanation. Watchdogs like SMART Elections flagged it immediately. They knew what this meant. If the system could be changed in the shadows, then every vote cast on those machines was at risk of miscount or manipulation."
"Their website, once home to testing logs, certification documents, and contact information, collapsed into a hollow shell shortly after the 2024 elections. Federal law all but guarantees labs like Pro V&V stay in power. Under the Help America Vote Act (2002), they're accredited by the Election Assistance Committee (EAC) in conjunction with National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). But once a lab is in, it stays in."
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 68 | June 10, 2025 7:27 PM
|
If true, it's a day late and a dollar short if expected to change the current situation.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | June 8, 2025 11:05 AM
|
I think this is the kind of conspiracy theory invented by simpering morons who can't deal with the fact that we lost the 2024 election and Trump won the 2024 election.
Just like when Trump and the MAGA cult couldn't accept that they lost the 2020 election. Same thing.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | June 8, 2025 11:19 AM
|
Two words/one name: Elon Musk
by Anonymous | reply 3 | June 8, 2025 12:06 PM
|
Trump is all about projection. Anything he accuses the Democrats of, he's doing himself. So, yes, I totally believe it. And yes, it certainly comes back to Musk...and Putin.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | June 8, 2025 1:23 PM
|
This is dead-end masturbation. Put your dick down, or find better porn.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | June 8, 2025 1:27 PM
|
I believe Elmo pulled some fuckery behind the scenes, but we’re also seeing a lot of morons admit to voting Dump because of issues like Israel. The biggest problem is the half the eligible voters who didn’t vote.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | June 8, 2025 1:30 PM
|
[quote]The biggest problem is the half the eligible voters who didn’t vote.
Good point R6. Not voting is a political action and has political consequences.
I just hope that all the people who didn't vote don't believe they have any right to comment or complain about the current state of the country.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | June 8, 2025 1:41 PM
|
Although the Voting Machines are not linked to the internet the VOTE TALLING machines are. Que Muskie's STARLINK. Easy peasy.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | June 8, 2025 2:19 PM
|
[Quote] I think this is the kind of conspiracy theory invented by simpering morons who can't deal with the fact that we lost the 2024 election
“We” 🤡
by Anonymous | reply 9 | June 8, 2025 2:30 PM
|
I meant the Democratic Party obviously R9.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | June 8, 2025 2:50 PM
|
Look at my posting history you stupid hysterical cunt R11. You're spineless and pathetic and I assume you're the OP and the "Democrats had the election STOLEN from us" conspiracy theory troll.
It was bad enough having to hear that unhinged and baseless shit for years from Trump and the MAGA cult and there's no fucking way I'm going to listen to it from Democrats because it isn't true. Deal with fucking reality.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | June 9, 2025 4:07 AM
|
[quote]The biggest problem is the half the eligible voters who didn’t vote.
And if they had voted? The majority of them may very well have voted for Trump. We'll never know.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | June 9, 2025 4:10 AM
|
No matter how true this may be, this story is going nowhere. DOA.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | June 9, 2025 4:43 AM
|
DOA like American democracy.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | June 9, 2025 6:20 AM
|
That's how Taco won all of the swing states.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | June 9, 2025 9:36 AM
|
Rockland county will be audited. The lawsuit is proceeding and the judge in the case has agreed to discovery.
IF massive discrepancies are discovered, you bet this will be news. Right now it's just speculation. It seems insane that there's been not a single forensic hand count, except for a few counties in Pennsylvania which only checked to see if the people who voted for dogcatcher in those counties matched the votes that were counted for dogcatcher. Not a single presidential recount in a single county.
In itself, that seems odd, given the 24/7 screaming by Trumplicans in the months before the election about how much cheating was going to be happening and they'd fight the results in every single county. That all went silent on the evening of Nov. 7
by Anonymous | reply 20 | June 9, 2025 9:38 AM
|
Honestly R15 - what's even your point.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | June 9, 2025 9:44 AM
|
The media is useless. So Elon's company "tabulated" all votes via an orbiting satellite. Dump was the ONLY Repug in USA history to win every swing state, and the only Repug in decades to win the popular vote - all while being the most hated man in America - all while loosing supporters since the last election that he lost......and ironically the orbit "decayed" just after the election of said satellite and it crashed destroying all records (even though they were constantly transmitted to terrestrial computers)......again, something is fishy and it's not Melania's rancid dripping discharging pussy.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | June 10, 2025 12:05 AM
|
^ [quote]all while being the most hated man in America
No, according to polling, that was Joe Biden.
by Anonymous | reply 24 | June 10, 2025 12:17 AM
|
[quote]and ironically the orbit "decayed" just after the election of said satellite and it crashed destroying all records (even though they were constantly transmitted to terrestrial computers).
Link please.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | June 10, 2025 12:20 AM
|
R24 you mean a Faux News Poll? Dump has had the absolute LOWEST approval ratings of ANY POTUS in history. Joe Biden had a low of 40% - orange boil on the ass of the country had a low of 34%
by Anonymous | reply 26 | June 10, 2025 12:20 AM
|
you will see news reporting hundreds of his satellites having premature decayed orbit and crashing to the Earth, but you won't see one linking voting tabulation - you have to stitch that together yourself R25 - but I have a feeling you're not interested.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | June 10, 2025 12:30 AM
|
R26 You are wrong.
CBS News: "Biden leaves office with his approval rating matching the lowest of his term"
"Overall, 36% of US adults say they approve of the way Biden handled the presidency"
"Biden’s favorability rating, a measure of personal feelings rather than job performance, stands at 33% favorable to 58% unfavorable..."
"His favorability rating has been mired in the low 30s for much of the past two years."
Gallup poll: "Biden's 13th-Quarter Approval Average Lowest Historically"
Got it? Lowest historically.
And so on. Would you like to see more polls from Dec2024-Jan 2025?
by Anonymous | reply 28 | June 10, 2025 12:32 AM
|
[quote]you will see news reporting hundreds of his satellites having premature decayed orbit and crashing to the Earth, but you won't see one linking voting tabulation - you have to stitch that together yourself [R25] - but I have a feeling you're not interested.
The only Starlink satellite that crashed in Nov 2024 was on the 11th and none in December.
So what satellite are you talking about?
And please post your evidence,
Thanks.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | June 10, 2025 12:38 AM
|
President Biden gave this country so many great policies. He handled worldwide inflation better than any country. We had the economy the world envied, and yet he left office with a very low approval rating. That just goes to show you what the corporate media will and can do when they want to which is create a narrative and make it stick.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | June 10, 2025 12:42 AM
|
Orange is a media guy, look who attended his INDOOR inaugural event
by Anonymous | reply 32 | June 10, 2025 12:44 AM
|
[quote]President Biden gave this country so many great policies. He handled worldwide inflation better than any country. We had the economy the world envied, and yet he left office with a very low approval rating. That just goes to show you what the corporate media will and can do when they want to which is create a narrative and make it stick.
No one gives a rat's ass about what the "world envies".
People were horrified about their grocery prices, gas prices etc....and whether you like it or not, the public always blames the President. That's the way it is.
The "corporate media" had nothing to do with what people were experiencing.
by Anonymous | reply 33 | June 10, 2025 12:59 AM
|
R33 Horrified? MARY! They weren’t that high. And gas was never very high. It was low Biden’s last year.
No, people go by FEELINGS not facts.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | June 10, 2025 1:04 AM
|
Trump outright said once said they were losing that night until elon fxed it
by Anonymous | reply 35 | June 10, 2025 1:08 AM
|
Has anyone mentioned the 2016 election?
by Anonymous | reply 37 | June 10, 2025 1:22 AM
|
[quote]Horrified? MARY! They weren’t that high. And gas was never very high. It was low Biden’s last year. No, people go by FEELINGS not facts.
Bud, stop rewriting history. The inflation rate under Biden was the highest it had been since the Carter administration 1977-1981.
And as far as gas prices are concerned, the average price was $2.39 per gallon when Biden's term began. By June 2022 the national average price of gas was over $5 per gallon. It did decline toward the end of his term, but the damage had been done.
by Anonymous | reply 38 | June 10, 2025 1:23 AM
|
R38 STFU INFLATION was higher under Reagan’s first term. It was brought down, like under Biden, yet he was given credit whereas Biden wasn’t. Why? The corporate media. Why do you think they’ve bought up all these local stations nationwide? You think it’s just for fun? Don’t be such a fucking dumbass. We all know why they control the media they control the narrative.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | June 10, 2025 1:27 AM
|
Everyone was tired of Trump and hated him. After he lost he just never went away. So 2024 was going to be his punishment, his humiliating comeuppance. A final "You lost" (three times). Everyone was going to vote against him. His campaign was tired and message less, and Kamala was out-raising him five times over. Early voters were wrapped around the block, anxious to get rid of him for once and got all.
Then Trump hooked-up with Elon. If he hadn't he'd be much poorer and in some kind of incarceration. Even Deplorable Magats were shocked.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | June 10, 2025 1:27 AM
|
R39 You do not know what you are talking about.
Average Year-Over-Year Inflation Rate by President. (Source: US Bureau of Labour Statistics):
Carter: 9.85%
Biden: 4.95%
Reagan: 4.68%
Trump: 2.46% (1st term)
by Anonymous | reply 41 | June 10, 2025 1:37 AM
|
[quote]Everyone was tired of Trump and hated him.
According to NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, MSNBC.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | June 10, 2025 1:40 AM
|
R41 Do Reagan’s first term. And you think 3 tenths is a big fucking difference? You magas don’t know math.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | June 10, 2025 1:41 AM
|
Ford’s economy was a nightmare but Carter barely beat him. Leftover from Civil Rights Act and Southern Democrats angry at the party.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | June 10, 2025 1:43 AM
|
R43 My statement "The inflation rate under Biden was the highest it had been since the Carter administration 1977-1981." is true. And you, my dear, were wrong.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | June 10, 2025 1:47 AM
|
[quote]Ford’s economy was a nightmare but Carter barely beat him. Leftover from Civil Rights Act and Southern Democrats angry at the party.
More than barely: inflation Carter: 9.85%....inflation Ford: 8.11%.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | June 10, 2025 1:50 AM
|
R45 no your statement was not true. You are going by a full eight years versus four years. Reagan‘s first term was higher than Carter’s and Biden‘s. Just suck it cause you lost.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | June 10, 2025 1:53 AM
|
The stupid people voted for the stupidest presidential candidate in history and there’s a fucking shit ton of stupid people in this country. Plain and simple.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | June 10, 2025 1:56 AM
|
R48 LOL.
Inflation rate during Reagan's first term:
"During Ronald Reagan's first term as president (1981-1985), the inflation rate decreased significantly. It started at 13.5% in 1980 and fell to 3.2% in 1985"
by Anonymous | reply 50 | June 10, 2025 1:59 AM
|
R49 Truth bomb. All grievances. None of this was about policy. None of it was about prices. It was all about grievances.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | June 10, 2025 1:59 AM
|
R50 you just owned yourself. Reagan‘s highest inflation was higher than Biden’s in his lowest was higher than Biden‘s lowest so therefore Reagan‘s average inflation in his first term was higher than Biden‘s. Yet he won an epic landslide in 1984 because he “fixed” inflation.
The conservative corporate media would never allow Biden to get credit for the inflation going down under his watch.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | June 10, 2025 2:01 AM
|
Someone in this thread doesn’t want this posted but here it is:
The average inflation rate during Ronald Reagan's first term (1981-1985) was significantly higher than in the later years of his presidency. While the inflation rate declined from 13.5% in 1980 to 4.1% in 1988, the average inflation rate during Reagan's first term was approximately 10%. This decline was largely attributed to the Federal Reserve increasing interest rates
by Anonymous | reply 53 | June 10, 2025 2:03 AM
|
Obama had them all beat.
Every Republican president from Hoover to Trump has seen a recession( sometimes TWO) or depression start under their watch. 100 years of economic data says Democrats are better for the economy by every single economic measure.
by Anonymous | reply 54 | June 10, 2025 2:06 AM
|
All Elon had to do is erase metropolitan area votes in strategic cities. The more sparsely-populated red counties were already in the bag.
by Anonymous | reply 55 | June 10, 2025 2:20 AM
|
R53 You have to take into account that when Reagan came into office in Jan 1981, the inflation rate was stratospheric, at 13.5. By the end of that first term it was reduced to 3.2%. The average during that first term was 5.5% but that takes into account to abnormal high of 13.5 at the beginning of his term.
Your claim of a10% average is false.
by Anonymous | reply 56 | June 10, 2025 2:30 AM
|
R56 Wrong, and Biden also came into a worldwide inflation crisis. You lost bitch.
by Anonymous | reply 57 | June 10, 2025 2:33 AM
|
When you handle inflation better than any other country and you don’t get credit for it that just shows how stupid Americans are. And it also shows how corrupt our media is. Both Reagan and Biden inherited inflation issues. Neither caused them. But it was actually Carter who installed Paul Volker, who eventually got inflation down that Reagan got credit for. Biden handled inflation better than any other country on Earth. Yet he got no credit.
Oh, and on top of it we went into a deep repression under Reagan to get inflation under control. Under President Biden, we not only maintained a healthy economy that grew at a great rate our unemployment numbers stayed historically low. Economist called it an economic miracle. All under President Biden. Yet the media didn’t give him one ounce of credit for that. Hmmmm makes you wonder, doesn’t it
by Anonymous | reply 58 | June 10, 2025 2:38 AM
|
Piggybacking off of R49
We share a country with an outsized proportion of entitled, ignorant assholes who would support authoritarian governance if it meant a return to the "good 'ol days" rather than simply accepting that America has changed, no matter what a politician or politicians may promise to do if they're elected to office.
Nothing we say or do will ever reverse the election outcome. We knew reelecting President Neck Pussy would be a shitshow and voter's remorse would set in among his supporters. They need to know they fucked up and fucked over the country. Zero sympathy.
by Anonymous | reply 59 | June 10, 2025 2:41 AM
|
This is too 2004 with Republicans rigging voting machines.
by Anonymous | reply 60 | June 10, 2025 2:43 AM
|
Who are these tired old queens who are dredging up decades old history talking about Ford. Carter and Reagan.
by Anonymous | reply 61 | June 10, 2025 2:46 AM
|
They will suffer pain if the person they like is inflicting it let that sink in.
What the New York Times article revealed is they don’t care that the Republicans have done nothing for them for decades. They feel like they care about them so they are willing to suffer greatly. If they like the person that is inflicting the suffering. I read that as a white conservative male. Very sad and this is why our country is where we’re at today.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 62 | June 10, 2025 3:02 AM
|
Meaning, I read that as a white conservative male inflicting the pain on them. I’m white, but I’m not a conservative male.
by Anonymous | reply 63 | June 10, 2025 3:03 AM
|
As some posters above stated, it's starting to make sense. Even the week after the election i remember thinking, "wow he really won *every* swing state?"
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 64 | June 10, 2025 1:30 PM
|
Yes he really won in every swing state. You need to get out of the bubble once in a while and see the real America. Then life won't be an endless stream of conspiracies.
by Anonymous | reply 65 | June 10, 2025 1:31 PM
|
Actually life will be an endless stream of conspiracies, but conspiracy is how the real world works. The lone person working alone never changes anything, not even an assassin. Back in the day we really needed blackboxvoting.org and it seems that we've become too complacent in the years since it was big news. Meanwhile, none of the people who made a career based on probable vote fraud like Chuck Hagel and certainly George W. Bush, have never been held accountable.
by Anonymous | reply 66 | June 10, 2025 2:31 PM
|
These are the same fucks who claim slamming airplanes filled with passengers into buildings filled with civilians "iz NoT a ConSpiRacy".
by Anonymous | reply 67 | June 10, 2025 3:25 PM
|
Trump could NOT lose. Can you imagine where he'd be today if he lost? The addition of "technologist" Xylon Dusk is all you need to know. He and Trump had nothing in common: electric cars vs. drill baby drill.
Even Magats were tired of Turd by Nov. 2024 (the fake assassination attempts were eye-rolling tacky). Most of them probably didn't even bother to vote.
Now they're saying the Pennsylvania 'shooter' was hearing voices. I bet he wasn't even there.
by Anonymous | reply 68 | June 10, 2025 7:27 PM
|