Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Controversial topic — is having sex at a young age (12 or older) harmful or not?

Interesting podcast with Diana Fleischman. She talks about a study that looked at minors (12 or older) having their first sexual experience and whether there was any correlation between the age gap between the partners and the idea that they were adversely affected by the experience. The results? There was no correlation between the age gap between the partners and the bad first time, but the biggest predictor of whether the minor had a bad first time was if the minor was female.

There’s also an iatrogenic factor in the idea of sexual abuse. If you tell minors, “If you have sex with an adult, that is abusive, and it will harm you psychologically,” the minor is primed to have bad psychological effects from the experience. But if you tell them, “You may or may not have bad psychological effects,” they’re less likely to suffer ill effects.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 3June 6, 2025 8:39 AM

It worked for me🤷🏻‍♂️

by Anonymousreply 1June 6, 2025 7:14 AM

When I was in junior high, stuff was going on. I can't imagine; barely through puberty and having sex? Why would you feel the need to pursue this before your body is even developed? Or your brain?

I wonder how many secret abortions occurred?

by Anonymousreply 2June 6, 2025 8:00 AM

Mental harm coming mostly from societal shame is probably right, but that’s how life works for a lot of stuff. You're either in the group out of the group, sometimes for arbitrary reasons. I always thought AoC was more of an image/goal, like "We (wealthy Christians) want society to look a certain way; so we'll use this knob to purposely dial that in, simply because we believe it is good." And that’s probably how most of human society was built. I can’t imagine there’s ever going to be much science behind what amounts to a social policy based on “feels”. Not to say it's a bad thing, but it’s just never been a science thing. Even scientifically sound generalizations like BMI are less useful in specific cases, but still helpful for broad societal guidelines.

by Anonymousreply 3June 6, 2025 8:39 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!