Hollywood verses AI Video Production
Google just released a new AI video generation system (VEO 3) that generates sounds and human speech. All the videos at link were created from text prompts. (No voices, pictures, or video clips were input by the author of the video)
Keep in mind that this is not the end of AI video development. IT'S JUST THE BEGINNING.
Will future versions allow a single author to create an entire movie that would have cost hundreds of millions of dollars to make? How can Hollywood stop this? (It can't.)
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 21 | May 26, 2025 2:11 AM
|
If it’s anything like AI stills, the human brain can detect a difference and no matter how hard they try, filmmakers will not truly be able to replicate human-made films.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | May 25, 2025 7:24 PM
|
A producer wrote this on twitter:
[quote] I used to shoot $500k pharmaceutical commercials. I made this for $500 in Veo 3 credits in less than a day. What’s the argument for spending $500K now?
The example pharmaceutical commercial he made is at link.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 2 | May 25, 2025 7:24 PM
|
Who gives a fuck what a producer for pharma marketing thinks?
by Anonymous | reply 5 | May 25, 2025 7:41 PM
|
I would love to be able to create stories with AI.
I've always wanted to do something like this, but was not going to spend tens of thousands to do an indie short film.
If I could create something as good as the fake pharma commercial, I'd probably do it (although I'm not paying $500 to make a 2min short.) I'd pay $500 to buy an AI tool, like I'm buying MS Office or other software suite.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | May 25, 2025 7:49 PM
|
Has it occurred to anyone that when everyone has the ability to make AI movies, movies will become meaningless?
by Anonymous | reply 7 | May 25, 2025 7:51 PM
|
None of these concoctions can receive a copyright, which makes them impossible to own and thus impossible to make money from
by Anonymous | reply 8 | May 25, 2025 8:07 PM
|
[quote]Has it occurred to anyone that when everyone has the ability to make AI movies, movies will become meaningless?
That is absurd.
Just because everyone had a typewriter (or computer) didn't make novels meaningless. Same with cameras on phones - didn't make photographers obsolete. People still hire wedding photographers and portrait photographers.
Sure - at some point you'll be able to write a prompt that says "create a movie with x,y,z" and a completed film will be produced. But, there's still room for the truly creative.
What will disappear is the need to pay writers, actors, and directors for crap when crap can be generated for free.
We don't need factory workers either when automation can run 24/7 at a fraction of the cost.
What's left is high skill - whether that's in factories, writing, or making films.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | May 25, 2025 8:38 PM
|
The people in them look dead in the eyes. And the hands look off. AI still can't get these things right.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | May 25, 2025 9:29 PM
|
R10 is posting from 2025.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | May 25, 2025 9:39 PM
|
It's only the beginning, We are all so fucked, not just Hollywood.
in 25 years, there will be no experts and authorities anymore.
There will be no more trust in reality.
There will be little human creativity and originality.
There will be total surveillance, recording and cross-referencing everything.
And the machines will be awake.
Im am glad I am entering eldergay territory.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | May 25, 2025 9:45 PM
|
[quote] The people in them look dead in the eyes.
I'm assuming that AI cannot fathom all components of impressions yet. It's like artificial flavors. They have ten or twenty components whereas the real flavor has 200 components. Once AI learns all face muscles and how they work together when showing an emotion, then it may look real.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | May 25, 2025 9:53 PM
|
A friend is a very talented painter. His brother took a photo of one of his paintings and cropped out about 80% of it. He then put that image into some AI tool and instructed it to “finish the painting.” The result was incredibly close to the original. It was amazing and disturbing.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | May 25, 2025 9:59 PM
|
[Quote] Just because everyone had a typewriter (or computer) didn't make novels meaningless.
Worst analogy in human history.
We ALREADY HAVE the analogy you should have used — AI writing for us. Which it’s doing. Right now.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | May 25, 2025 9:59 PM
|
I'm probably missing a big piece about the sky falling on Hollywood. But that whole industry is based on illusions. It's its sole purpose to sell illusions. It's fake make-believe, and audiences are praising the best movies depicting something that isn't real. At some point AI will probably become its own genre, just like cartoons and anime. Movies with real actors may become its own genre that is made without any AI and SFX. And then there will be the mix of both which is currently the mainstream. Things are changing.
I'm only talking about entertainment. I'm really scared out of my ass about facts in news and manipulation of information in general.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | May 25, 2025 10:04 PM
|
Here's an AI generated action movie clip made by Google Veo 3 and its other product, Flow. The video and audio is entirely AI.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 17 | May 26, 2025 1:52 AM
|
The future of porn looks mighty interesting...
by Anonymous | reply 19 | May 26, 2025 1:57 AM
|
Hmm it looks like a very expensive video game at r17, but I'm sure in 2 years, it'll be flawless.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | May 26, 2025 1:59 AM
|
This is a 3-minute video that shows how they are creating these videos in VEO 3 with text prompts.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 21 | May 26, 2025 2:11 AM
|