Prince William’s Temper ‘Boiling Over’ After French Media Publish Invasive Photos

There’s a place in France where they don’t wear pants, the just bitch and moan about a couple of candids. They have no power of the French press.

How is this any different from what Harry complains about?

Yet Harry always gets criticized for it, and William always gets a pass.

Because Harry is a whiny do nothing bitch.

^Where's my crepe mix, Duchess??

His Royal Highness demands PRIVACY when he’s in public!

Was Kate skiing topless? She doesn't have what most men would call a rack.

He is going to be king. Sooner rather than later. It's only going to get worse. Clearly he needs anger management classes. Or else he can renounce his title move to Montecito and do exactly the opposite of H and Megs.

I don’t understand what they need a vacation FROM.

Their lives suckling at the teat of the public coffers is vacation ENOUGH.

Heavy the head that not yet wears the crown. Or something like that…those crazy Brits!

[quote] I don’t understand what they need a vacation FROM.

Lol. That's exactly what I was thinking.

Doing nothing is exhausting!

R2 The difference is William and Catherine didn't leave the royal family to quote "seek more privacy" and then immediately start giving interviews, create podcasts, produce a Netflix documentary and later a cooking show, publish a tell all book that includes facts about his penis or his wife taking shit in the woods in Africa, create a lifestyle brand, posting personal family moments on Instagram...etc.

I’m so weary of these White Royals Problems that these entitled people whine endlessly about. So putting their displeasure and anger out there in the media constantly, simply will place more focus on them.

When does she get to stop being Kate Middleton? I was watching a quiz show the other day that asked the maiden name of Edward's wife Sophie, and I'd completely forgotten it. But for some reason the future Queen never gets a title? Or even to be known by what the people who know her call her (Catherine)?

These inbred pasty boys are so irrelevant.

Unless one or both of them have a documented 50 Load Weekend, I’m not interested.

Doesn't Wills look kind of like Chris Watts in OP's photo?

Interesting...

If a “few photos” make him “boil over” he should consider therapy.

Oh the injustice. What a cruel world we live in. This is even worse than global warming and wealth disparity.

Now his cue-ball head is purple.

He needs to fall into a Prince and the Pauper type situation.

Unless the pictures are of his dick in a rent boy he can just get over it. His only value is his recognizability, unless you count his sperm.

Can he impose sanctions on the French, who dared to photograph him while he was visiting their country?

Something really has to be done.

Are they anything like the shots paps got of them the last time they "expected privacy" at a French chalet?

This way they bring more tourists to the country so what is he getting so hot and bothered about?

If the paps bother him so much he could take a lesson from his brother. Become a worthless annoyance, a trained poodle and wander around London ringing doorbells while shouting 'Security!'.

Courchevel!? Quite a flashy plutocrat resort for a British prince. Klosters too frumpy now?

Is anyone other than "Out of Touch Weekly" reporting on this?

Has Wills tried meditation? Even some simple breathing exercises?

He's going to stroke out in a characteristic blind rage 2 months after Charles goes and we'll have little King what's his face and Dowager Kate to look forward to soon. I'm here for it.

[quote] He's going to stroke out in a characteristic blind rage 2 months after Charles goes and we'll have little King what's his face and Dowager Kate to look forward to soon. I'm here for it.

If Charles died, and then William stroked out, wouldn't that mean Prince Harry would become REGENT until Prince George becomes of age?

Now THAT would be fun!

Would Kate have to bow to Meghan, if Harry became Regent?

I think Kate would be Regent, not Harry.

Not necessarily, R26. The Regent needs to live in the UK, Not sure if Harry even has established residency in the UK anymore.

Can you imagine Kate as "Queen Mother?"

Where are the photos?????

Thats not possible r29??

[quote] Where are the photos?????

I googled it and found an article by a royal blogger that had pictures and videos of their holiday.

And guess what?

The website said that the videos and pictures were DELETED.

How in the fuck is William able to get photos and video on some obscure website, deleted?

That's so bogus. What an asshole.

This Instagram account has a few pictures.

I saved them, so even if "The Palace" gets them deleted, I'll still have them.

For a ski holiday, it looks awfully warm.

The kids are all bundled up, and William is in shorts!

On the slopes...

Anger also boiled over years ago when William's parents berated the media for intrusive behavior on private holidays. The media is not going to stop, because what have we all done...clicked on sites to look at the pictures.

Both William and Harry deserve privacy from the media as they enjoy time with their wives and children. They both court the media as it suits them too. Harry and his Mrs., however, also court it for financial gain. That's the difference between the brothers. On some level, I cannot blame Harry. He's an uneducated dolt who has no other options after the choice he made.

Perhaps they ought to follow the example of their Grandmother. The media was more respectful when her children were youngsters, of course. Then again, she did not take them to Swiss resorts. She had the Britannia or the closed gates of Balmoral where they could enjoy a private life without intrusion. That intrusion took off after Diana appeared on the scene, but before her, there were intrusive photos of Margaret enjoying her extramarital affair with a younger man. "The Palace" may have said a word to the publishers and editors on Fleet Street. The Queen just put on a brave face.

R25, imagine the flying necklaces and dog bowls!

I like how Kate's sweater says "SKI." Indeed, ma'am. Can't argue with that.

That was a vocabulary lesson for her doltish children.

I love this photo.

Charlotte is serving DIVA with those shades!

The French are horrible people. Everyone knows it so this should come as no surprise.

William is very hot with that beard. I look forward to having an alpha king again finally.

I would say he's an impossible to educate dolt. He had the best teachers and schools an individual can have and he was so dim and lazy he couldn't retain anything and really didn't want to. His teachers would cheat for him in deference to the monarchy and he would be hailed everywhere and live the life of a billionaire without actually being one. He gave it all up for a yachtgirl's loose pussy and has no idea why nobody in his family want anything to do with him when he's done nothing but trash them to the world.

Was he always this stupid? Of course. He just had the monarchy with an entire apparatus protecting him from constant humiliation and his stupidity prevented him from having any idea that this was the situation. Now he literally stumbles around London wondering where everyone is having no idea they were living their lives and not constantly thinking about him. He doesn't get it and never will. All he knows is he wants reconciliation with his father and brother while at the same time saying the royal family wants him and his wife and children dead. A complete loon.

Enough about William, R44. What are the Tork girls up to these days.

York!

You are the fucking heir to the British throne, you have no privacy. Even if you were to embrace your irrelevancy and resign you would have no privacy, Billy Boy. Get over yourself and/or stay home.

Worthless nepotism baby emotions. Film at eleven.

And I thought Trump was a petty fucktard.

Did he really have the best teachers? It’s not like he went up to Oxford. Most of those royals can barely spell.

[quote] Yet Harry always gets criticized for it, and William always gets a pass

Is this thread your idea of “a pass?”

Actually, that's not entirely true, R47. Queen Elizabeth came to the US several times as a private citizen and no one was the wiser. She came for horses and horse breeding and, I imagine, a bit of a break. I'm sure she had many close friends here.

[quote]I think Kate would be Regent, not Harry.

Kate absolutely would become Regent, with help from older family members such as Anne and Edward. Harry will have nothing to do with any of it.

The pics are a bit invasive, the slope pics are no biggie (they are out in a public space) but the ones of them at their chalet and the kids and Kate on the balcony are intrusive.

The shot of barefoot (skinny-legged!) William holding up the large champagne bottle in front of the kids, like he was about to open it up, guzzle it and yell, "let them eat cake!" is hilarious. I can see why he'd be pissed about that one and want it deleted.

[quote]Thats not possible [R29]??

How is it not possible R31???????

A Queen Mother is a former Queen who is the mother of the reigning monarch. If William becomes King, Kate becomes Queen, and if William dies before her, Kate is a former Queen and George is the new King, and at that point Kate, being a former Queen who is now mother of the reigning monarch, ,does indeed become "Queen Mother."

Yes, we should believe this story because InTouch Weekly is an authoritative, accurate source of all to do with the Royal Family! 🤡

R55 not necessarily Philip was never King

That’s a non-sequitur^

R57 doesn't make any sense.

R55 No. As an anointed Queen, she would remain Queen Catherine. The term 'Queen Mother' was used for the late Queen's mother because it would have been too confusing to have two living queens called Elizabeth.

"Queen Mother" is in a sense a nickname, it's not a ranked, formal title doled out by the Monarch like a Dukedom. r 60 is correct, QEII's mother was known as the Queen Mother because they shared the same name, and b/c she was alive for so long after the death of her husband there was a need for a way to distinguish the two of them.

One presumes that if Catherine becomes Queen Consort, and William dies fairly young, she will eventually perhaps choose to be known as "Queen Mother". It's a lot like the Princess Royal honorary title, one receives it at behest of the monarch, with the permission of the grantee.

He seems to have Diana’s temper and tendency to cut off people who cross him.

[quote] One presumes that if Catherine becomes Queen Consort, and William dies fairly young, she will eventually perhaps choose to be known as "Queen Mother". It's a lot like the Princess Royal honorary title, one receives it at behest of the monarch, with the permission of the grantee.

Especially because by the time George becomes King and then gets married, I'm sure his wife (who will be Queen) wouldn't want her mother-in-law being referred to as "Queen," as well.

There should only be one person referred to as Queen, in the Kingdom.

R63 That isn't how it works, you dim twat.

This fussing over the proper address of titles is ridiculous--it matters only to courtiers and people who read and care about The Court Circular.

Most of us will never meet her, and if we do we know to call her "Your Royal Highness." But beyond that, it doesn't really matter whether people refer to her as HRH Catherine, The Princess of Wales or as Princess Catherine ("Not even an actual title!" gasp Marys everywhere) or as Princess Kate or as Kate Middleton.

We all know whom is being referred to.

I find r63's twat to be bright and shiny.

We will just call her Meemaw Kate.

R63 is a queen queen.

The reigning monarch designates their spouse as king or queen. It is not a given. Some are still upset that Charles gave Camilla the title

I didn't even know it was possible to ski in late-May. Do they cover the slopes in fake snow especially for them?

R69 Wrong. The wife of a King is automatically a Queen.

[quote]How many times did Queen Elizabeth visit Kentucky? The queen has a known love for horses and has visited the Bluegrass State five times: 1984, 1986, 1989, 1991 and attended the Kentucky Derby on her last visit in 2007. Enjoy some of the locations the queen has visited in Kentucky by planning your own trip!

QEII visited Kentucky in a private capacity several times.

Why in a million years would Charles not have given Camilla the title of Queen? There has yet to be a living wife of a reigning king of England or of the United Kingdom who was not given the title. Henry VIII even gave the title to some of his wives while a previous wives were still living.

[quote] Kate absolutely would become Regent, with help from older family members such as Anne and Edward.

True. Formally.

Because he had promised his Mummy. Easily made, easily broken.

Those pics are almost as annoying as my CUNT sister-in-law.

Fuck the French. They should have gone to Switzerland.

Charles didn't give Camilla the title Queen. The late Queen Elizabeth expressed her desire that Camilla would be known as the Queen Consort, i.e. she would be known as Queen Camilla. Not that it was necessary for the late Queen Elizabeth to do that, as Camilla would automatically become Queen Consort but the late Queen was aware of all the lunatics who would attack Charles for simply following tradition, protocol and law, so Elizabeth had to underline that this is exactly what she wanted.

Prince Billy always looks so peevish, cranky and out of sorts. He’s going to make one miserable king.

Dude, try smiling for the cameras, even if you don’t feel it. Think of yourself as an actor playing the role of a charming, dashing royal.

Because that’s what everyone wants to see. NO ONE wants to learn about your problems and disappointments, let alone see them etched on your brow. Shape up or ship out. What would Grannie do? is what you should be asking yourself.

William is a controlling asshole. Always has been. Always will be.

Well, William's parents are/were very damaged people.

And their parents, and so on…

Camilla automatically became "Camilla, the Queen Consort" when Elizabeth II died, but Charles issued a royal warrant in before his coronation in 2023 that she would henceforth be known as "Queen Camilla."

So it wasn’t automatic. You people make up a lot of shit about your BRF around this place.

Op grayed out.

Oooooh. Looks like like OP upset a Prince Willy fanatic. It's all crossed out.

[quote]So it wasn’t automatic. You people make up a lot of shit about your BRF around this place.

It was in fact automatic that she was given the title "Queen Consort" when Elizabeth II died, so people were technically correct that she was automatically made the queen when her mother-in-law died.

So you are wrong and they are right.

You're the one making up a lot of shit about the BRF around this place.

You don’t read well. He warranted that she be styled as Queen Camilla; it didn’t happen automatically.

He was going for the royal belt-and-suspenders treatment of making your promoted side-piece into the Queen of England.

[quote]R80 William is a controlling asshole. Always has been. Always will be.

That’s why the Rose Hanbury affair died; his ceaseless peevishness and pique are a lot to take.

[quote] You don’t read well. He warranted that she be styled as Queen Camilla; it didn’t happen automatically.

No one said anything to the contrary. In fact, I wrote that previous point you are accusing me of not reading very well.

For the last time: Charles did not make it so she became queen, as you had asserted. She was made queen automatically. He just specified how she would be particularly styled.

I asserted no such thing. You’re all mixed up. Bark elsewhere.

It's probably not worth starting another thread so I'll drop this here. It appears that Charles has started carrying a walking stick. He was pictured talking to David Beckham at the Chelsea Flower as he held onto one that was about chest height. Not a cane exactly. I guess he needs it to steady himself? I wonder if this will become a regular thing during public appearances

"When a king marries, his wife is called a "queen consort" because she gets a special title through marriage, but she doesn't have ruling power. However, when a queen is the ruler, her husband doesn't automatically become a king because being called "king" usually means having real power" As if any of this means anything in the lives of human beings.

English common law is based on patriarchal customs. Under common law, wives automatically take on their husband's status, but husbands of higher ranked wives do not.

The moment Camilla and Charles married, she was always going to be Queen Consort legally. The Princess Consort thing was really just a way to soften people to the idea of the marriage just a few years after Diana had died.

Her royal ho-ness

R83, r84, the Queen Consort is titled the Queen. The fact that that People article doesn't even know that shows just how little credibility it has. But I wouldn't expect anything credible on the British Royal family from People magazine.

Just to be clear: there is no difference between being the Queen Consort and being the Queen. The Queen Consort is the Queen.

R93, it's a cane not a walking stick. You can't use a cane, especially that high, as a walking aid. He's been seen with canes over the decades. It's a style thing, not a health thing.

Charles was pictured talking with lots of people, not just Beckham.

[QUOTE]You can't use a cane, especially that high, as a walking aid

Why not? Does it not help to steady?

Just to underline what utter bullshit the People magazine article linked at r83 is, a royal warrant has nothing to do with titles: it's issued to businesses that have been chosen by the monarch to supply the royal household. R83 has no fucking idea what a royal warrant even is.

Not when it comes up as high as his chest, r99.

Explains, please, r101...

Read this for more on the correct height for a walking aid and Charles' use of canes as a style accessory. Maybe he had some more cancer therapy before his big trip to Canada and wanted something to lean on.

HELLO! has been reassured that the King's choice of accessory is simply that - a traditional country fair walking stick, rather than a walking aid..

Ha! Well, that settles it. Not.

It doesn’t take a brain surgeon to realize that he needs some type of support, and a cane would look unhealthy. Voila, it’s “just a stick” for a country gentleman.

He needs a better barber, or more regular visits.

The article linked at R103 clearly shows he's been using this type of walking stick for nearly 30 years.

No, it shows he had used a stick on occasion at least 30 years ago, none of which, as shown, indicate ordinary “working day” use. As the article says, the focus is why *now* is he using the stick—if even just to get out of a car.

He didn't use the very tall cane to get out of the car, r107.

It’s right there in the pictures. Did he have that with him everywhere a couple of weeks ago. Hmmmm…No.

R109, it's not in the pictures of him getting out of the car. A couple of weeks ago he was walking fine. Given that no one goes from walking fine to needing assistance walking in a couple of weeks, if he's not carrying the cane because he likes it as an accessory, then he may be tired from the cancer treatment. He has a trip to Canada to prepare for.

You’re blind; he’s getting out of a car with a stick in hand. In multiple Brit newspapers, and online everywhere.

“ Given that no one goes from walking fine to needing assistance walking in a couple of weeks.”

Really—I’ve seen it happen in one minute, much less a week. Your assertion makes no sense at all.

Really, r111? Link, please. Here's a video of him getting out of the car at the Chelsea Flower Show without a stick in hand. Someone hands him the cane later on.

Christ—it is the third pic in the scrolldown for God’s sake

Too bad William isn't gay. I'd like to see him hook up with Jared Kushner, and both be versatile grunting piggies.

That's the Windsor Horse Show, r114, not the Chelsea Flower Show.

Who gives a shit where it is? That wasn’t the point being made, by anyone.