Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

​​CONCERT CRISIS: Janet Jackson unable to sell tickets to Las Vegas residency as 60% of seats remain unsold

Janet Jackson is struggling to sell tickets to her Las Vegas residency, and about 60% of seats are still available for Wednesday night's premiere performance, The U.S. Sun can confirm. Jackson's Las Vegas residency's premiere night has so far seen a poor ticket sale turn out with just one day till showtime.

The Vegas hotel signed on to bring Janet, 59, back for shorter run in February that stretched over Valentine's Day, and then again this week from May 21 through May 31 with six shows.

But with the big opening night just one day away, ticket sales on AXS show a majority of seats in the 5,000 person venue still available. The other dates do not look much more packed than the premiere. Prices range from just above $50 to $444 a seat, according to the ticketing site.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 158May 24, 2025 10:07 AM

I heard she was white.

by Anonymousreply 1May 22, 2025 4:22 AM

60%??? That's not so bad.

by Anonymousreply 2May 22, 2025 4:37 AM

I don’t know her.

by Anonymousreply 3May 22, 2025 4:50 AM

Never understand why she has trouble with ticket sales. She has 27 top 10 hits which she always perform. She doesn't play every shitty song on a new album like another contemporary. She dances and she engages the crowd too.

by Anonymousreply 4May 22, 2025 5:24 AM

Who?

by Anonymousreply 5May 22, 2025 11:19 AM

No empty seats like at Janet's concerts.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 6May 22, 2025 11:24 AM

R4 She does all that and lip-syncs, too ! That's why fans don't go to her concerts.

by Anonymousreply 7May 22, 2025 12:10 PM

Will she waddle around the stage as usual?

by Anonymousreply 8May 22, 2025 12:15 PM

[Quote] Never understand why she has trouble with ticket sales. She has 27 top 10 hits which she always perform. She doesn't play every shitty song on a new album like another contemporary. She dances and she engages the crowd too.

The main issue is she’s no longer a media personality. Even Madonna tries with her pathetic insta pictures. Usually, these old timey singers play small suburban venues to entertain the adoring fraus. JJ thinks she can still sell out massive venues

by Anonymousreply 9May 22, 2025 12:17 PM

It's foolish to compare Madonna and Janet. Madonna literally gets 5x the streams of Janet on Spotify on a daily basis (same as Mariah) so clearly one of them is doing better than the other.

by Anonymousreply 10May 22, 2025 12:56 PM

[quote] She does all that and lip-syncs, too ! That's why fans don't go to her concerts.

So do Britney and Madonna.

by Anonymousreply 11May 22, 2025 1:55 PM

Madonna doesn't lip sync all the time, she does do it occasionally.

by Anonymousreply 12May 22, 2025 1:56 PM

[quote]She has 27 top 10 hits which she always perform.

All of which sound the same; the sound of rusty jail doors slamming shut.

by Anonymousreply 13May 22, 2025 2:06 PM

Read the handwriting on the wall, honey.

by Anonymousreply 14May 22, 2025 2:07 PM

Can't she unload them on her fellow MAGAts?

by Anonymousreply 15May 22, 2025 2:10 PM

I saw her last year. Never a huge fan but bought last minute tickets and had great seats. It was fun and I knew more songs than I realized I did. That said, after that shit she said about Kamala, I’d never pay to see that Auntie Tom again.

by Anonymousreply 16May 22, 2025 4:17 PM

All of Vegas is experiencing a downturn.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 17May 22, 2025 4:43 PM

She needs to have a documentary made about her to remind the masses who she was

by Anonymousreply 18May 22, 2025 5:02 PM

Remember, Madonna's Madame X tour was a flop that had many cancelled shows (in small theaters to boot). The only reason her last tour was a success was because she finally played songs that people had been wanting to hear for decades.

And her Rio show which keeps getting brought up was a free concert. Many acts have done them and attracted the same numbers. Including Gaga, who recently did a show there and pulled bigger numbers than Madonna.

by Anonymousreply 19May 22, 2025 5:03 PM

If Janet had a free concert, would 1.6 million people show up? Doubtful. And it makes sense Gaga would pull bigger numbers, she's not a legacy act.

by Anonymousreply 20May 22, 2025 5:05 PM

Rod Stewart played Copacabana in the 90's and drew 3.5 million people.

Rolling Stones played Copacabana in the mid 2000's and drew 1.5 million people

[quote]If Janet had a free concert, would 1.6 million people show up?

In brazil? I have no idea.

by Anonymousreply 21May 22, 2025 5:07 PM

I know someone who saw her in Vegas in 2018 (or maybe it was 2019). He was with a group of people; I believe they had VIP seats because the photo he texted me showed all of them at a table with drinks.

by Anonymousreply 22May 22, 2025 5:17 PM

I heard she wasn't really talented.

by Anonymousreply 23May 22, 2025 5:19 PM

Sixty percent? So lucky.

by Anonymousreply 24May 22, 2025 5:21 PM

Good! Now come get your fucking bastard baby, bitch.

by Anonymousreply 25May 22, 2025 5:22 PM

Who wants to see an elderly, obese woman waddle across a stage while lip syncing to her horrible, paper thin vocals on terribly dated songs?

I’m shocked there was even 40 percent sold, although plenty of those are probably comps they give away to old ladies who hit it big on the quarter slots.

No talent and a MAGAT.

Janet Jackson sucks.

by Anonymousreply 26May 22, 2025 6:04 PM

Madonna is a horrible, rotten human being but Janet is nowhere near her level of success. Janet is more like a Debbie Gibson, Pebbles or Jody Watley-level of performer. A relic of a distant era who should be grateful for a slot at Ribfest.

Plus, she doesn’t have any talent.

Also, showing her gross, meat loaf tit at the Super Bowl was unforgivable, In front of children!

Nasty, indeed.

by Anonymousreply 27May 22, 2025 6:18 PM

It never felt like she liked to perform or that she extends much to her fans. Hardly any interviews or talk shows or anything - practically a shut-in for the past couple of decades. She's not a big personality.

I think you need to generate excitement as an artist to generate sales - she just doesn't - for me, at least.

I'm also tired of these residencies being pushed and promoted so much. Celine brought them back in a huge way and that was a big deal at the time as I think she was still at the top of her career then (?).

Just call it what it is - a series of dates. The PR around a residency has lost its buzz. The U2 dates did well but - they are U2 and they also played a really trippy high-effect show at the Sphere that was mind-blowing.

by Anonymousreply 28May 22, 2025 6:19 PM

I missed this. What did she say about Kamala?

by Anonymousreply 29May 22, 2025 6:36 PM

It's shocking to me how far Janet fell. I guess it can be traced back to the Superbowl "wardrobe malfunction" escapade, but prior to that, if you consider the late 80s through very early 2000s, Janet's popularity basically rivaled Madonna's. I wouldn't say she was ever a "legend" like Madonna, a status that is comprised of more things than Billboard chart placements and record sales, but she was most definitely a superstar. She had a few less than stellar albums in the early/mid 2000s, which coupled with the Superbowl incident and subsequent backlash seemed to derail everything, but I still can't quite think of another major act that had such a sharp fall from the top. And she has never really recovered from it, whereas other artists who had periods of collapse (Mariah, post Glitter, for example) were able to rise again and recover at least some of the ground they had lost.

by Anonymousreply 30May 22, 2025 6:44 PM

[quote]She needs to have a documentary made about her to remind the masses who she was

If she needs a documentary to remind the masses, it goes to how ultimately forgettable her music is.

by Anonymousreply 31May 22, 2025 6:50 PM

I’ve heard people enjoy the show but they are not expecting her to be in n peak form. They themselves are middle aged fraus and just want to groove a little and leave early so they are home by 9:30.

by Anonymousreply 32May 22, 2025 6:51 PM

R30 - Mariah hasn't had a hit since the Bush2 administration. But she keeps herself in the press and there's that damned Christmas song to keep her in people's memories every year.

There are some people in college who, outside of her Christmas song, have never heard her music.

by Anonymousreply 33May 22, 2025 6:53 PM

[quote]Mariah hasn't had a hit since the Bush2 administration.

Let's be real. None of them have.

by Anonymousreply 34May 22, 2025 6:56 PM

[quote] It's shocking to me how far Janet fell.

Cyndi Lauper gets more daily streams than Janet. CYNDI LAUPER! That's wild because Janet was popular for decades while Cyndi was definitely not.

by Anonymousreply 35May 22, 2025 7:06 PM

R35 - well, Cyndi's also on her farewell tour right now so that's a big factor.

by Anonymousreply 36May 22, 2025 7:10 PM

Janet is too all of to engender any goodwill. She lost a lot of fans when she married that rich Arab and went MIA.

by Anonymousreply 37May 22, 2025 7:12 PM

Sorry meant aloof

by Anonymousreply 38May 22, 2025 7:12 PM

Janet and Al Mana had a secret marriage away from the spotlight because it had a business agreement behind it.

The agreement had two clauses. One was that the singer would receive $100 million if their marriage lasted at least five years.

The second clause was that she would receive another $100 million if she gave birth to a boy for the billionaire.

Jackson became pregnant in 2016 and had a son, Elissa, in 2017, when she was 50 years old.

The singer decided to file for divorce on the basis of cultural differences from her billionaire husband in 2017, shortly after she gave birth to her son.

Al Mana also kept his own part of the bargain by giving Jackson the sum of $200 million after they parted ways.

by Anonymousreply 39May 22, 2025 7:18 PM

R36, this has been the case for years, long before her farewell tour. Time After Time and Girls Just Wanna Have Fun are still played constantly on the radio and they have been for decades.

by Anonymousreply 40May 22, 2025 7:27 PM

[quote] There are some people in college who, outside of her Christmas song, have never heard her music.

Please name these “people in college.” Go ahead. Waiting.

You can’t because you just made that shit up and pulled it out of your fat, crusty ass.

Liars are the fucking worst.

by Anonymousreply 41May 22, 2025 7:38 PM

6 dates in t a residency. People just shit any words out their pie holes now.

by Anonymousreply 42May 22, 2025 7:39 PM

6 dates is not a residency...

by Anonymousreply 43May 22, 2025 7:39 PM

Maybe a real issue for Janet is that she comes from that "family" and the weird reputation that comes from being a part of that family. Or maybe it's a testament to how much Michael overshadowed all of his siblings and set the bar way too high. And he still breaks records even after the accusations. All Janet did was flash her nipple for two seconds. Literally, a two second clip gave birth to Youtube, but she can't create a buzz for herself. I'm mystified.

by Anonymousreply 44May 22, 2025 7:46 PM

The secret code for Ticketmaster is "whisper coo" for 30% off.

by Anonymousreply 45May 22, 2025 7:47 PM

Janbot has entered that chat at R41 and is NOT pleased!

by Anonymousreply 46May 22, 2025 7:53 PM

What happened to the days when divas performed live at an outdoor concert in Central Park ? If Barbra and Diana can do it, why can't Janet, dammit ?

by Anonymousreply 47May 22, 2025 9:21 PM

There’s always Laughlin. 🎰

by Anonymousreply 48May 22, 2025 9:27 PM

R10 “literally”

Oh, dear

by Anonymousreply 49May 22, 2025 9:33 PM

Such a crises that she just added fall dates for September 10-20.

Do yourself a favor, OP (and all the other haters) — watch Janet, aka the Queen of Pop, perform and receive her ICON award next week at the AMAs. She’ll probably even do a bit of her TikTok viral Hot 100 top 3 hit “Someone to Call My Lover.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 50May 22, 2025 9:33 PM

The Great Lawn is now limited to events that only hold 5,000 people. The days of Diana and Garth Brooks and 800,000 people are gone, sadly.

by Anonymousreply 51May 22, 2025 9:34 PM

She looks 1000 years old.

by Anonymousreply 52May 22, 2025 9:42 PM

^I agree

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 53May 22, 2025 9:43 PM

R51 That's still too many seats for Janet to fill.

by Anonymousreply 54May 22, 2025 10:27 PM

I am going to see Janet on Sunday night. She is an electrifying performer.

by Anonymousreply 55May 22, 2025 10:32 PM

[quote] Janet is more like a Debbie Gibson, Pebbles or Jody Watley-level of performer.

Bitch...Madonna was TERRIFIED of Janet's back-to-back No.1, multi-platinum albums each spawning 5 to 7 top ten pop hits and dominating the Black/R&B/Urban charts. We loved them both for decades. I don't know these wizened, gnarled Janet-haters. Everyone I know loves Janet.

by Anonymousreply 56May 22, 2025 10:41 PM

Hee Hee- "But with the big opening"

by Anonymousreply 57May 22, 2025 10:52 PM

[quote]Bitch...Madonna was TERRIFIED of Janet's back-to-back No.1, multi-platinum albums each spawning 5 to 7 top ten pop hits and dominating the Black/R&B/Urban charts

Indeed she was.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 58May 22, 2025 11:37 PM

No, R50. Because she can’t fucking sing.

by Anonymousreply 59May 22, 2025 11:43 PM

Couldn’t also be because travel to the US is down thanks to the orange clown…

by Anonymousreply 60May 22, 2025 11:51 PM

LOL not Pebbles, R27!

hahaha

by Anonymousreply 61May 22, 2025 11:51 PM

[quote] Madonna was TERRIFIED of Janet's back-to-back No.1, multi-platinum albums each spawning 5 to 7 top ten pop hits and dominating the Black/R&B/Urban charts.

Uh, no. This is rewriting history. At her peak, the only female artist Madonna was jealous of was Whitney. Madonna said that when Whitney died. She never felt threatened by Janet. In fact, she made fun of her a lot. Arsenio Hall himself spoke about this. Madonna was so bold/dumb that she actually told Michael Jackson that he shouldn't working with Janet because it would (to parphrase) be beneath him at the Oscars ceremony (I believe Jermaine spoke about this). That pissed Michael off to no end lol. He obviously told Janet that which is probably what prompted her to tell Ebony "as far as I"m concerned, if you don't have something nice to say, don't say it. But if I did hate her, I'd have good reason to." She doesn't feel the same way about Janet now, her son listens to Janet all the time and even performed to her songs.

by Anonymousreply 62May 22, 2025 11:57 PM

This iconic Janet quote about Erotica is funnier than anything Madonna has ever said about Janet

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 63May 23, 2025 12:06 AM

R4 But the bitch can’t sing.

by Anonymousreply 64May 23, 2025 12:20 AM

R17 Irony for this ho.

Her stankin as couldn’t conceit that Kamala Harris was a black woman influencing voter turnout among blacks.

Now Trump’s antics are fucking her bank up because no one wants to travel. No nose ass bitch.

by Anonymousreply 65May 23, 2025 12:23 AM

R63 Where's the funny part?

by Anonymousreply 66May 23, 2025 12:27 AM

[quote]Never understand why she has trouble with ticket sales.

She doesn’t - at least no more or less than any other artist does from time to time. This woman has had multiple successful world tours over the years with the latest one, Together Again, so in demand that it spanned several continents and was extended for a year due to demand. She’s also STILL the record holder for most successful debut world tour by an artist.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 67May 23, 2025 12:37 AM

R53, what does Madonna’s appearance have to do with my comment at r52?

Do you see Madonna and Janet in a zero sum game or something?

by Anonymousreply 68May 23, 2025 12:52 AM

[quote]She doesn’t - at least no more or less than any other artist does from time to time.

Streisand did five major tours from 1994 - 2017 and never had trouble selling tickets, ever. She set box-office records for selling out so quickly in a number of venues throughout the country each time a tour was announced, with record-setting ticket prices.

by Anonymousreply 69May 23, 2025 12:53 AM

It's time to RETIRE

by Anonymousreply 70May 23, 2025 1:02 AM

BI 5/22 This hotel/casino had to give away nearly 2,000 seats for last night's show featuring this permanent A list alliterate singer. “

by Anonymousreply 71May 23, 2025 1:26 AM

I'll never understand why people keep comparing Madonna and Janet Jackson. It happens in every thread about Janet. Madonna is a bona fide music icon who is still to this day, the highest selling female artist in music history and known all over the planet. Janet isn't even in the same league as Madonna. Not even vaguely. Comparing Janet with Madonna is ridiculous and unfair to Janet because it's impossible to compete with the career of Madonna.

A good comparison for Janet would be Paula Abdul. Similar number of hits, sales and fame, similar level of vocal ability and similar dance ability. The only difference is that Janet was handed a music career due to the Jackson family industry connections.

by Anonymousreply 72May 23, 2025 1:27 AM

[quote] Janet is more like a Debbie Gibson, Pebbles or Jody Watley-level of performer. A relic of a distant era who should be grateful for a slot at Ribfest.

What an idiotic comparison. They each had 3-4 hits and barely lasted the same number of years.

by Anonymousreply 73May 23, 2025 1:34 AM

Speaking of Streisand, she, Janet and Springsteen are the only three artists with #1 albums spanning the 80s, 90s, 2000s and 2010s.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 74May 23, 2025 1:39 AM

She only has Trump to blame. (and Randy)

by Anonymousreply 75May 23, 2025 1:40 AM

[quote]What an idiotic comparison. They each had 3-4 hits and barely lasted the same number of years.

Idiotic is being nice. It’s downright stupid. Debbie Gibson? Jody Watley? 😆Surely he jests. Janet Jackson is an icon. Her stamp is on generations of pop and R&B acts. Her superstar status was cemented with the hit-making streak that ran from 1986’s Control (which, by the way, influenced late ‘80s debut albums by Watley, Pebbles, Karyn White, Paula Abdul et. al.) through to 2001’s All For You, where each release was a #1 event with multiple award wins (including Grammys and an Oscar nom), record setting chart and music industry achievements and tours, films, endorsements, and a bevy of influential music videos that still influence today’s artists - let alone several of her albums are on Greatest of All Time lists. From Britney and Beyonce to Gaga and Rihanna, she’s your fave’s fave and has influenced them all.

by Anonymousreply 76May 23, 2025 1:49 AM

[quote]The only difference is that Janet was handed a music career due to the Jackson family industry connections.

AND? This oft-stated comment about her always perplexes me. So what? She can’t help what family she was born into. She actually didn’t even want to become a recording artist at first, but was convinced by her father to go into the family business after a stint as a child actress. It when until she finally decided to take the reins of her career and fire her father as her manager that she began to soar. Anyway, Hollywood is rife with nepotism, and Janet Jackson’s familial ties are no different than anyone else who comes from a famous family. Even if your name gets you through the door, it’s ultimately what you do when you get in the room that matters. Of all the Jackson siblings, she is the only one other than Michael to achieve true worldwide superstardom. If being a “Jackson” guaranteed success, then every solo Jackson act would be an iconic multi-platinum album-selling member of the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame.

by Anonymousreply 77May 23, 2025 2:00 AM

[quote]AND?

It's very clear to everyone but you that Janet wouldn't have ever had a music career without the family connections R77.

by Anonymousreply 78May 23, 2025 3:04 AM

Yikes! Saw this on my FB feed...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 79May 23, 2025 3:13 AM

Wow R79! That's really serious - "a sea of empty seats". In the comments her fans hate that she is a Trump/MAGA voter. Guess Janet shouldn't have retracted that apology about her racist comments about Kamala.

She killed what was left of her career and she's only got herself to blame.

by Anonymousreply 80May 23, 2025 3:20 AM

OH NO!

"With hours to go before opening night, US pop superstar Janet Jackson is facing performing to a near-empty crowds".

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 81May 23, 2025 3:21 AM

MORE OH NO!

LOOK at how fat she is too!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 82May 23, 2025 3:27 AM

[quote] BI 5/22 This hotel/casino had to give away nearly 2,000 seats for last night's show featuring this permanent A list alliterate singer. “

Well at least they got the PERMANENT A-LIST (i.e. iconic) part right. BTW, Resorts World Las Vegas has already booked her for a September 2025 residency.

by Anonymousreply 83May 23, 2025 4:05 AM

It's the same shit as Beyonce...she tours too damn much! She's continually doing shows somewhere and she has a rapidly aging fanbase. They don't need to see her every damn year.

by Anonymousreply 84May 23, 2025 5:02 AM

She’s a horrible MAGAT with no talent and a rotund prostitute who spread her fat legs for a shady middle easterner (redundant) for cash.

Repulsive, gross and irrelevant.

by Anonymousreply 85May 23, 2025 10:07 AM

[quote]I'll never understand why people keep comparing Madonna and Janet Jackson.

Uh…well then you must need other things explained to you too, like the red traffic light means stop and the green one means go.

by Anonymousreply 86May 23, 2025 10:59 AM

That photo, R82, is several years old (but you already knew that).

This is Janet now…

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 87May 23, 2025 11:02 AM

I see Janbot is still tryiing to say the Madame X tour was a flop. Bitch, it clearly was not a flop. We can ALL google it. The only cancelled dates were due to her being severely in pain as she was crying most night at the end, and then cancelled due to Covid. Madonna had just had a hugely successful large arena tour 3 years prior, a huge stadium tour 3 years prior to that, and a really huge stadium tour 3 years prior to that. Shal I go on? Comparing JJ to Madonna never ends well for JJ, but you allow us to showcase Madonna’s impressive stats you dumb cunt.

by Anonymousreply 88May 23, 2025 11:04 AM

I know a place where you can comfortably start and end your career.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 89May 23, 2025 11:10 AM

It’s hilarious how you cretins are scouring the internet for negative info about her Vegas show and then hastily posting social media blurbs and random articles from sketchy sites in some weird effort to get Janbot’s goat. Meanwhile, Janet’s residency was renewed for MORE shows in the fall. ROFLMAO.

by Anonymousreply 90May 23, 2025 11:11 AM

[quote]I see Janbot is still tryiing to say the Madame X tour was a flop

That’s because it, like the album, WAS a flop, and highly embarrassing to say the least.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 91May 23, 2025 11:15 AM

I saw the Madame X tour in Chicago. And saying so out loud is part of my recovery.

Jesus Christ, it was a rancid piece of shit.

by Anonymousreply 92May 23, 2025 11:31 AM

^Rocco^

by Anonymousreply 93May 23, 2025 11:50 AM

32 years ago, on May 18, 1993, Janet was the highest paid female recording artist with her new recording $40M contract with Virgin Records, and debuted at the top of the Hot 200 album charts with "janet", staying there for 6 weeks.

Then Streisand inked her new contract with Columbia, becoming the highest paid female recording artist (reported to be closer to the $50M mark), and knocks Jackson out of the top spot by debuting at #1 with "Back to Broadway" upon it's release on June 29. People expected Streisand's album to do well, but no one was truly expecting and album of B'way showtunes to knock 'janet' out of the top spot in 1993.

by Anonymousreply 94May 23, 2025 12:13 PM

What big singles did Barbara have off that album?

by Anonymousreply 95May 23, 2025 12:18 PM

At one brief moment in time 32 years ago Janet Jackson was the highest paid female? Wow. Just stunning achievements!

R92 A distinction usually reserved for a Janet Jackson concert.

by Anonymousreply 96May 23, 2025 12:49 PM

[quote] What big singles did Barbara have off that album?

*crickets*

by Anonymousreply 97May 23, 2025 12:57 PM

R84 Oh please. Janet is not touring stadiums. Her venues are half the size of the Queen and she is still struggling to sell tickets. Beyoncé’s Renaissance tour is one of the highest grossing tours of all time. She just got greedy because she just toured and inflation is crazy.

by Anonymousreply 98May 23, 2025 1:13 PM

I find it interesting that Janet's recent tour did absolutely nothing to create interest in her back catalogue while Madonna's tour actually did wonders for her.

by Anonymousreply 99May 23, 2025 1:36 PM

[quote] That’s because it, like the album, WAS a flop, and highly embarrassing to say the least.

When was the last time Janet was even a big touring act?

by Anonymousreply 100May 23, 2025 1:43 PM

I guess her MAGA fans aren’t showing up. Oh well.

by Anonymousreply 101May 23, 2025 1:54 PM

I doubt 60% of DL posters would even consider going to her show.

by Anonymousreply 102May 23, 2025 1:55 PM

Putting a picture of Janet Jackson next to Barbra Streisand is like putting an image of an expired Slim Jim next to a chateaubriand.

Janet isn’t fit to work at the Wet Seal in Barbra’s mall.

by Anonymousreply 103May 23, 2025 2:46 PM

[quote] When was the last time Janet was even a big touring act?

Judging by her ass and gut, she’s the biggest.

by Anonymousreply 104May 23, 2025 2:46 PM

With that being said, I heard the MAGA cunt does actually put on a good show.

by Anonymousreply 105May 23, 2025 3:36 PM

[quote]I find it interesting that Janet's recent tour did absolutely nothing to create interest in her back catalogue

Either you’re living under a rock (which is a likely scenario for most of you people), or somehow completely missed that her top 3 Hot 100 hit from 2001, “Someone To Call My Lover,” recently went insanely viral on TikTok and boosted her streaming numbers exponentially.

by Anonymousreply 106May 23, 2025 3:37 PM

I somehow always picture that rancid Janet-hating cunt Matthew Rettenmund (sp?) as the tapping fingers behind these insane anti-Janet DL posts. It’s part hilarious and part sad.

by Anonymousreply 107May 23, 2025 3:39 PM

R105, she does. Her touring style is different from Madonna, she is more "intimate". Madonna is intimate in moments (like "In this Life" in the Girlie Show) but she is more concerned with putting on an exciting show. I like both. But Madonna is the greater touring act.

by Anonymousreply 108May 23, 2025 3:44 PM

These Janet threads are a textbook case in misogynoir. Miya Bailey would be disgusted.

by Anonymousreply 109May 23, 2025 3:44 PM

The Rhythm Nation Tour remains the biggest debut world tour by any artist. That alone cemented her icon status. She is your fave’s fave. Revel in it and seethe.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 110May 23, 2025 3:51 PM

“ I doubt 60% of DL posters would even consider going to her show.”

I doubt 60% of DL posters would even be able to find the cord to charge the rascal so they could scooter out of the house to the show anyway

by Anonymousreply 111May 23, 2025 3:53 PM

R110 To me stats like that are meaningless. Janet released a few albums and singles prior to Rhythm Nation. She just wasn’t able to tour until that point in her career. Well some artists like Britney did a world tour a year after their debut album. It took Queen Bey took only her 2nd album to conduct a headlining world tour.

by Anonymousreply 112May 23, 2025 4:03 PM

[quote]To me stats like that are meaningless.

To you, fat meat ain't greasy. Britney and Beyonce both grew up idolizing Janet and their careers show her influence. Argue with your mama about it.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 113May 23, 2025 4:34 PM

Janet is also the first woman to debut a single (two, to be exact) in the top 10 of the Hot 100, the first woman to nab a Producer of the Year Grammy nom, the only artist with 7 top 5 Hot 100 hits on a single album, the first artist to have an album produce #1 singles in three separate calendar years, the first artist to debut an album at #1 during the SoundScan era, the first artist to have a Hot 100 #1 in the 80s/90s/2000s, the first artist to have three albums generate five or more top-ten singles, the only black artist with #1 albums spanning the 80s/90s/2000s/2010s, the only Jackson with an Oscar nomination...

by Anonymousreply 114May 23, 2025 4:39 PM

R113 who do you think you talking 2. 😂 Yes they looked up to her as a legend. Now they are much bigger than Janet has ever been. Fall back and worship your MAGA diva on Truth Social.

by Anonymousreply 115May 23, 2025 4:43 PM

R114 All of those achievements and she still had to marry an Arab billionaire for financial security. The Queen built her own foundation.

by Anonymousreply 116May 23, 2025 4:44 PM

What’s the overall tourism like in Vegas these days.

by Anonymousreply 117May 23, 2025 6:28 PM

[quote]who do you think you talking 2.

You, bitch. Did I stutter?

[quote]Yes they looked up to her as a legend.

And still do. They exist in the house that Janet helped build, and no amount of idol worship from their stans (you included) will change that. And, Britney ain’t bigger than anybody these days, poor thing. Swaggerjacked Janet’s whole career and now exists only to twirl in a haze on her social media platforms. But, at least she does it to Janet songs.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 118May 23, 2025 6:35 PM

[quote]All of those achievements

That’s it. That’s the tweet. Unless you’re Janet’s accountant, everything else you were prattling on about is simply an assumption, and a stupid one.

by Anonymousreply 119May 23, 2025 6:39 PM

Ooo Teacunt vs Janbot. Talk about a clash of the titans!

Janet and Beyonce fans never cared for each other, so it was bound to happen.

by Anonymousreply 120May 23, 2025 6:41 PM

Poor Teacunt probably wasn’t around when Janet was ruling MTV and the Billboard charts, debuting films at #1 at the US box office, signing record-breaking album deals, winning awards hand-over-fist and reaping massive dividends from her influential world tours. At least Beyonce was watching, practicing her moves with a hairbrush in front of her mother’s mirror. Oh, and Solange too, who is also on record for saying that Janet was an influence (and whose own albums are like the daughters to Janet’s “The Velvet Rope” album).

by Anonymousreply 121May 23, 2025 6:51 PM

We have entered into a racist phase that loves 1963 and we’re wondering why a black pop star whose family is a host of monstrous dirt can’t fill old and/or fat people stadiums?

by Anonymousreply 122May 23, 2025 7:12 PM

[quote] insanely viral on TikTok

What a fucking retard🤣

by Anonymousreply 123May 23, 2025 7:48 PM

[quote]What big singles did Barbara have off that album?

None. Not one. No radio promotion or MTV promotion with videos like Janet had preceding her album's release. That is what was truly baffling - a Streisand album of show tunes debuts at #1 with no promotion (except magazine ads mostly in trade magazines), knocks the highly publicized Janet Jackson album out of the top spot. No one saw that coming. And Streisand would repeat this strategy again in 1997 ("Higher Ground"), in 2009 ("Love Is The Answer"), in 2014 ("Partners") and in 2016 ("Movie Partners Sing Broadway").

(There were plans to release 'With One Look' as a single with a video in the USA, but that was scrapped. The single was released in the UK, only because it was used in radio and TV ads promoting ALW's opening of 'Sunset Boulevard' that summer, which pissed off Lupone).

by Anonymousreply 124May 23, 2025 9:21 PM

R118 There are countries where Janet Jackson is simply unknown. There is no country on planet Earth where Britney and Beyonce are not known by the general public or people who follow pop culture. Maybe some African countries don’t know Britney.

by Anonymousreply 125May 23, 2025 9:34 PM

I used to cap for Janet before her MAGA stance. This bitch walking around with a half Indian child just like Kamala Harris’ background. So is Janet’s child not black? Then again, the Jacksons are so fucked up in the head, she probably wishes the child has no African ancestry.

“I like my negro nose with Jackson 5 nostrilsss 🎶 “

-Queen Bey

by Anonymousreply 126May 23, 2025 9:36 PM

Janet Jackson has been over for a long time.

by Anonymousreply 127May 23, 2025 9:39 PM

[quote]which pissed off Lupone).

What doesn't piss off Lupone?

by Anonymousreply 128May 23, 2025 9:40 PM

R100, you tried...

BUT...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 129May 23, 2025 9:58 PM

R110, you tried...

BUT...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 130May 23, 2025 9:58 PM

R129 Haha. Fucking Janbot owned. And Gaga literally had just come into public consciousness. She rode that debut world tour off her first album. Even Queen Bey was lowkey shooketh.

by Anonymousreply 131May 23, 2025 9:59 PM

R130 Wait but her Wikipedia says that was her 2nd world tour. If you used that fucking AI at the top of the screen when using Google now, you can’t trust it.

by Anonymousreply 132May 23, 2025 10:01 PM

Her problem is that she really only appeals to one generation and no one older or younger.

by Anonymousreply 133May 23, 2025 10:02 PM

[quote][R110], you tried...

No, honey. YOU tried, and failed. EPICALLY. The Monster Ball was not Gaga’s debut tour. Her debut tour was the Fame Ball Tour, and while it did pull in respectable revenue, it did not make nearly as much as the Rhythm Nation tour. If there’s one thing TeaCunt got right in here, it’s that you can’t always trust AI - a lesson I’m sure you’ll remember next time.

So, in short — The Rhythm Nation World Tour remains the most successful debut tour by an artist, and this is a fact that you’ll just have to breathe in and learn to live with.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 134May 23, 2025 10:40 PM

Imagining the insta-regret that TeaQueef must’ve had at R132 by co-signing R129’s hot mess of a post at R131 is uproariously hilarious. 😂 😆😆😂

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 135May 23, 2025 10:47 PM

[quote] They exist in the house that Janet helped build, and no amount of idol worship from their stans (you included) will change that.

Forgive them because they know not what to think.

Indeed, Janet BUILT the house for the Black girls. Some of you are too old and drug-addled to remember when Madonna AND Michael Jackson were envious of Janet's unflagging success. She hit at a time when Black women and their music were not critically acclaimed or rewarded unless it appeared a white man was the svengali. Janet didn't have a Clive Davis or a Tommy Mottola pulling levers behind the scenes.

by Anonymousreply 136May 23, 2025 11:30 PM

Janet was never in the same league as Madonna and Whitney.

by Anonymousreply 137May 23, 2025 11:32 PM

[quote] Ooo Teacunt vs Janbot. Talk about a clash of the titans!

You think they’re different people?

Awww. That’s cute.

by Anonymousreply 138May 23, 2025 11:46 PM

R138: They're not the same, you can easily detect that with their writing style. Janbot has been here long enough where veteran DLers are familiar with his postings. This is why we know when he arrives in a Janet thread, even when he doesn't sign his posts as "Janbot."

Janbot, while vociferously devoted to Janet, sounds educated and has a command of the English language; TeaQueef does not.

by Anonymousreply 139May 23, 2025 11:53 PM

I blocked Janbot so I can say they are not the same person.

by Anonymousreply 140May 24, 2025 12:14 AM

[quote] Some of you are too old and drug-addled to remember when Madonna AND Michael Jackson were envious of Janet's unflagging success. She hit at a time when Black women and their music were not critically acclaimed or rewarded unless it appeared a white man was the svengali.

I agree that Janet was massively influential and she often goes ignored but Michael and Madonna had 0 reason to be jealous of her. Why would they be? They were the two biggest pop stars of the 20th century while Janet was nowhere near that level. Janet stans do her a big diservice by comparing her success to Michael's and Madonna's. She will lose that battle, hard.

by Anonymousreply 141May 24, 2025 12:16 AM

LOL at the person comparing Janet to Paula Abdul.

And LOL at the even dumber comment about Madonna and MJ being jealous of Janet.

by Anonymousreply 142May 24, 2025 12:31 AM

[quote] LOL at the person comparing Janet to Paula Abdul.

Exactly. Paula was a much better dancer and singer.

by Anonymousreply 143May 24, 2025 12:37 AM

Nobody has even heard the name Paula Abdul outside of the US.

by Anonymousreply 144May 24, 2025 12:47 AM

🎵 there were times when I look above and beyond… 🎵 *4 people clap*

by Anonymousreply 145May 24, 2025 1:14 AM

R144 “It’s a party up in here!”

by Anonymousreply 146May 24, 2025 1:15 AM

Paula had much more talent, didn’t marry a terrorist and didn’t abandon her bastard DeBarge baby on her sister’s doorstep.

by Anonymousreply 147May 24, 2025 1:56 AM

She's got sum big-uns

by Anonymousreply 148May 24, 2025 2:16 AM

[quote]Forgive them because they know not what to think.

Oh, how I try, but it's difficult to forgive such idiocy LOL.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 149May 24, 2025 2:53 AM

[quote]I blocked Janbot

Blocking is weak. You are weak. If the kitchen is too hot, then GTFO.

by Anonymousreply 150May 24, 2025 2:54 AM

Paula enjoyed her success off of the back of Janet's Control album, whose videos dazzlingly showcased her choreography and got her gigs with George Michael, ZZ Top, Debbie Gibson, The Pointer Sisters and several other music acts, and even landed her some film work (Coming To America, Can't Buy Me Love, The Running Man, Action Jackson, etc.). Her debut album Forever Your Girl was clearly a direct result of her work with Janet and the rousing success of Control.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 151May 24, 2025 3:07 AM

I always thought Whitney's cover of Janet's "Control" in a 1987 concert was cute.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 152May 24, 2025 3:17 AM

Why they’re famous, we don’t know — but Paula Abdul’s gotta go!

by Anonymousreply 153May 24, 2025 5:18 AM

[quote] I agree that Janet was massively influential and she often goes ignored but Michael and Madonna had 0 reason to be jealous of her. Why would they be?

I didn't suggest their jealousy was rational. Both were extremely egotistical and always looking over their shoulder. Janet was "cooler" than Madonna or MJ. She was the Queen for young urban audiences.

by Anonymousreply 154May 24, 2025 5:49 AM

I'm no Janbot because my favorite Jackson is La Toya (do not come for me because I didn't send for you!) but I never understood all of the hate Janet constantly gets on here.

by Anonymousreply 155May 24, 2025 5:55 AM

Janet was definitely more popular in the 90s than Madonna and MJ--in America, at least. I always felt that Madonna's Bedtime Stories and MJ's Dangerous and History were their way of trying to compete with the Janet/Jimmy Jam/Terry Lewis sound of the 90s.

by Anonymousreply 156May 24, 2025 5:56 AM

Randy Jackson (Janet's brother, not the other one) was once involved with Paula Abdul.

by Anonymousreply 157May 24, 2025 9:27 AM

Who would pay to hear this bitch 'sing'? She squeaks and coos, that's about as far as it goes.

by Anonymousreply 158May 24, 2025 10:07 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!