Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

The Sudden Fall of Banana Republic

I had no idea that this label was once considered wildly original and glamorous. The video explains where it all went wrong.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 74May 21, 2025 2:01 AM

You’ve got it wrong—it was not considered wildly original and glamorous. It was kitschy and not unreasonably priced.

by Anonymousreply 1May 19, 2025 6:42 PM

Banana Republic was not exactly "original." They were in a category with J. Crew, LL Bean and Lands End, all offering casual clothing with a somewhat "preppy" twist, the kind of clothes that try hard to be relaxed and casual.

by Anonymousreply 2May 19, 2025 6:58 PM

According to the video, it was considered "bohemian" in the few short years between the store's opening in 1978 and its acquisition by Gap Inc. in 1983

by Anonymousreply 3May 19, 2025 7:02 PM

Exotic, lol. It was “mall trousers for Gen X white dudes” by the 1990s.

by Anonymousreply 4May 19, 2025 7:07 PM

It was a standard colonialist-themed mall store. The Bombay Company for chinos.

by Anonymousreply 5May 19, 2025 7:21 PM

I prefer shopping at Shot Down Over Ecuador, Jr.

by Anonymousreply 6May 19, 2025 7:23 PM

OP- My banana 🍌 is not going down . In fact it’s going up right now 🍆.

by Anonymousreply 7May 19, 2025 8:14 PM

It was the opposite of glamorous, but the quality and sales were good for a few years long ago.

by Anonymousreply 8May 19, 2025 8:25 PM

R5 gets it better than Op and the lame video.

A fake jeep is not glamour!

by Anonymousreply 9May 19, 2025 8:27 PM

My plantain is bigger and harder, r7.

by Anonymousreply 10May 19, 2025 8:28 PM

It’s not a clothing store, it’s a destination!

by Anonymousreply 11May 19, 2025 8:30 PM

R11 Unless you’re Rocco Steele I may have you beat.

by Anonymousreply 12May 19, 2025 8:33 PM

I'm better looking r12.

by Anonymousreply 13May 19, 2025 8:45 PM

Ha! I actually still have a shirt I bought from the pre-Gap Banana Republic. Decades later it still holds up really well. I vaguely remember the jeep in the store when I bought it. I think it was the one in Beverly Hills

by Anonymousreply 14May 19, 2025 8:52 PM

Jeep: Beep, beep!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 15May 19, 2025 9:38 PM

R14 ha

by Anonymousreply 16May 19, 2025 9:43 PM

BR actually had good quality stuff years ago - but I suspect with everything the quality has declined while prices haven't.

They still have some nicely cut stuff. You could do worse.

They probably do need to rebrand though - I don't find the name offensive, but it doesn't bring really evoke any positive thoughts or feelings.

by Anonymousreply 17May 19, 2025 9:48 PM

They should absolutely rebrand, maybe BR-549.

by Anonymousreply 18May 19, 2025 10:18 PM

There are only so many times a label can be revived. Maybe it should just go gently and make way for newer, fresher brands.

by Anonymousreply 19May 19, 2025 10:54 PM

I thought the OP was referring to the United States, not the retailer. Carry on!

by Anonymousreply 20May 19, 2025 11:38 PM

I also remember when Banana Republic first emerged in the 1980s. The fashion sense was throwback to 1930s explorer/world traveler. Think Indiana Jones. And yes, it was a bit pricey but the quality of the apparel was pretty good. I still have a shirt, a sweater and a cargo pants from back then, and where them from time to time. I think they had to change their business model because the novelty of the old-timey fashion was wearing off, and they had to change to stay relevant.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 21May 20, 2025 12:05 AM

In the 90s it was like a slightly upscale version of The Gap--the clothes were pretty dull but unobjectionable for the era, and they were of much better quality--but also more expensive. (I think they were owned by the same company.)

by Anonymousreply 22May 20, 2025 12:07 AM

Weren't they usually across from a&f in the malls

by Anonymousreply 23May 20, 2025 12:15 AM

I bought a Banana Republic sweater at Costco last winter. So I'd say they're doing fine.

by Anonymousreply 24May 20, 2025 12:22 AM

r24 Banana Republic satisfies the lofty fashion standards of Costco? Well by golly then count me back in!

by Anonymousreply 25May 20, 2025 12:31 AM

I loved BR because everything looked so clean cut. I knew my exact size in it clothes and could pick up nice items on sale.

And then suddenly, everything in the store started looking so drab—black and grey. Nothing original

by Anonymousreply 26May 20, 2025 12:38 AM

I don't get this. Banana Republic in the mid-80s was a kitchy safari-themed mall store. By the 90s they were a more expensive, suaver version of The Gap (which had also abandoned its quirky 70s roots), just as Old Navy was the cheaper version of The Gap. And where's this idea that Banana Republic disappeared coming from? I bought some pants and t-shirts there this past winter: good quality, good fit.

by Anonymousreply 27May 20, 2025 12:53 AM

Wait til the less informed here, such as Op, find out that A&F was originally an outfitter for explorers and hunters. The “original model” for Abercrombie was some guy named Teddy Roosevelt.

by Anonymousreply 28May 20, 2025 12:56 AM

I buy business casual clothes from Banana Republic when they have sales to wear to work .

by Anonymousreply 29May 20, 2025 1:11 AM

The Sudden Fall of R29

by Anonymousreply 30May 20, 2025 1:19 AM

I didn't fall. I slipped.

by Anonymousreply 31May 20, 2025 1:35 AM

"Most people don't realize it still exists"....

Oh, brother.

by Anonymousreply 32May 20, 2025 1:35 AM

What’s wrong with the quote?!

—Yogi Berra

by Anonymousreply 33May 20, 2025 1:51 AM

Their downfall was when they denied Faye a credit card.

"You don't know what hard feelings are until I come out publicly against your company and you'll see how much you sell!".

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 34May 20, 2025 2:12 AM

She threw a fit, but at least she didn't throw a salad!

by Anonymousreply 35May 20, 2025 2:16 AM

In 2007, plenty of young store employees would reply to Dunaway’s “Don’t you know who I am?” with, “I honestly don’t.”

by Anonymousreply 36May 20, 2025 2:36 AM

2007’s COUGAR CLUB was no CHINATOWN

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 37May 20, 2025 2:42 AM

Who IS that alien faced hag R37?

by Anonymousreply 38May 20, 2025 3:15 AM

I have a couple of their catalogs from 1984. It was all water color illustrations and passport stamps and vivid descriptions on sepia paper, a combination of vintage army, stockpiled surplus and reproductions of classic Safari wear. So many versions of khaki shorts but not an ounce of polyester. Shame they didn’t stay niche. The clothes really were high quality.

by Anonymousreply 39May 20, 2025 3:43 AM

R37 Why must you bring up that movie? What about the movie she did with Marlon Brando? Why don't you talk about Johnny Depp? And Emir Kusturica?

by Anonymousreply 40May 20, 2025 5:30 AM

So, did J Peterman borrow the Banana Republic style of drawings and stories in the catalog? Seems similar.

by Anonymousreply 41May 20, 2025 6:15 AM

Seems like it.

If you search for “Abandoned Republic”, there’s an archived (?) website devoted to the original concept. It seems to be called “SecretFanBase.com” now. Has scans of the old catalog product pages and history and memorabilia.

GAP bought it in 1984, kept the original owners on and their concept but panicked after the late 80s stock market crash and retooled everything which resulted in the current bland, boring clothes.

by Anonymousreply 42May 20, 2025 6:50 AM

^^ That site with the initial catalogues is fascinating : )

by Anonymousreply 43May 20, 2025 7:25 AM

Meanwhile the Trump administration hires like old Abercrombie.

by Anonymousreply 44May 20, 2025 8:22 AM

The website R42 refers to has great examples of their (to me at the time) unwearable gear full of unnecessary pleats, plackets, buttons, etc. Very mid 80s mall extravagance.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 45May 20, 2025 10:40 AM

I have come here to say that BR is my last hope for work clothes. I’m a 60-year old lesbian who is fit and a professional. There is nowhere else to shop. If I want to wear acrylic, highly patterned, poorly structured, generic dresses, there are a plethora. I’m not even sure that there is a company that makes women’s professional clothes any more and if someone knows of one, please help a friend out.

by Anonymousreply 46May 20, 2025 11:48 AM

Ann Taylor or Talbots. ;)

by Anonymousreply 47May 20, 2025 12:00 PM

Great find R45! The entire BR collection basically repeats itself every five pages lol.

by Anonymousreply 48May 20, 2025 12:07 PM

Had some GREAT sales back in the day.

by Anonymousreply 49May 20, 2025 12:27 PM

I had no idea that back in the day, the Banana Republic catalog was just like the J. Peterman catalog. I think BR still has great workwear and some classic styles. I'm not opposed to fast fashion, but some things ought to last for more than a year.

by Anonymousreply 50May 20, 2025 12:37 PM

I remember the jeep, a lot of fake foliage, a little bridge over a nonexistent water way and piped in nature sounds. Amongst the chinos and r-shirts. If they didn't sell pith helmets they were definitely part of the aesthetic. It was high camp in a retail setting, something rarely seen, ever.

Gap killed all that uniqueness. 15 years ago they had a full line inspired by Mad Men, just the opposite of what they once aspired to. I haven't set foot in one in over a decade. It's not even a shadow of what it once was, it's something totally different.

by Anonymousreply 51May 20, 2025 1:00 PM

T-shirts not r-shirts lol

by Anonymousreply 52May 20, 2025 1:00 PM

There are no words for how much I adore R6.

by Anonymousreply 53May 20, 2025 1:01 PM

I first heard of Banana Republic when Oprah featured their pashminas in her Favourite Things show. I recall they were in pink and blue, and in specific tones that didn’t really flatter Oprah herself.

by Anonymousreply 54May 20, 2025 2:56 PM

I always thought of Banana Republic as overpriced business casual clothes for men. At least, that's what is was from the late 90s onward. I did like their black, Pima cotton tees around 20 years ago, but they were expensive for what they were and stretched out terribly after a year or so. Any that I have still are used as night shirts and could basically double as sack dresses if I ever decided to start cross-dressing.

by Anonymousreply 55May 20, 2025 3:25 PM

Tight little Pima cotton tees so we can show off our pecs?

by Anonymousreply 56May 20, 2025 3:38 PM

[quote]The video explains where it all went wrong.

No in-house playlist.

by Anonymousreply 57May 20, 2025 3:42 PM

BR fell into the Gap. The end.

by Anonymousreply 58May 20, 2025 3:44 PM

"Wildly original and glamorous" seems far off the mark from what I recall. I only became aware of the brand in 1983 the year Gap purchased it. There were, as I recall, vestiges of a safari adjacent theme. And I don't recall the original style of catalogues with the hand-drawn illustrations and J. Peterman-esque copy. A very preppy female boss was keen on the brand in 1983 and its safari jacket and explorer hat regalia, which she noted was the origin of the brand which had already gone a little more conventional I gathered. It started popping up in shopping malls and later city centers from about this time. I think there was still some element of jungle theme to the store decor, less to the sales stock. It was very khaki and not my thing.

Over time it became more conventional and eventually landed somewhere near a less tweedy, trimmer fitting version of Brooks Bros. It was hit or miss. One visit and there would be many choices, a few months, bad choices. Later I would suppose one of its main competitors was J. Crew and for a while they seemed two sides of the same coin. At some point both of them seemed to have troubles and never quite hit on a strong image again, I would pass a BR store and it seemed to be trying on some new idea every few months.. Banana Republic's fall is surprising only in that it was so long in coming.

by Anonymousreply 59May 20, 2025 6:18 PM

R59 reposting his Cliff Notes version of history.

by Anonymousreply 60May 20, 2025 6:20 PM

Jack from Will and Grace

by Anonymousreply 61May 20, 2025 7:51 PM

R61 I was actually thing the same scenario myself.

"It's just about the banana."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 62May 20, 2025 8:02 PM

They had a "Mad Men" collection about 15 years ago.

by Anonymousreply 63May 20, 2025 8:10 PM

They had a madman in the jungle collection about 45 years ago.

by Anonymousreply 64May 20, 2025 8:15 PM

Veddy veddy strange

by Anonymousreply 65May 20, 2025 8:36 PM

[quote] They had a "Mad Men" collection about 15 years ago.

Hollywood and fashion love the Mad Men style, but even during the 00s-vintage craze, it never took off among women. In the age of Casual Friday, they’re willing to wear Spanx, not waspies and corsets.

by Anonymousreply 66May 20, 2025 11:53 PM

Nebuchadnezzar was not part of the collection …ahem.

by Anonymousreply 67May 20, 2025 11:57 PM

Which was not*

Some autocorrect that was, Muriel 😵‍💫

by Anonymousreply 68May 20, 2025 11:57 PM

Why is it that the BR staff changes so quickly? You rarely see the same person working there two times.

by Anonymousreply 69May 21, 2025 12:53 AM

You’ve been inside more than once in the past X years?

by Anonymousreply 70May 21, 2025 12:57 AM

They worked with much higher-quality materials in the 1990s. It really made all the difference.

by Anonymousreply 71May 21, 2025 1:11 AM

I stopped shopping there after years of being a loyal customer when, around 3005 or 2006, I had several pairs of pants all lose their hem. So I'd end up with a pair of pants where one leg was a 31 inseam and the other leg on the same pair of pants a 35. I looked like I had one leg drastically shorter than the other because one leg had a nice break on it while the other leg had far too much fabric bunching up at the ankle and dragging on the floor. If it had been just once, no big deal. A fluke. A second time? Not good but not the end. But a third pair--all bought seasons apart--coming unstitched at the hem? WTF? I've only had that happen with their pants and never had it happen since. Shitty stitching, shitty clothing.

by Anonymousreply 72May 21, 2025 1:30 AM

I remember being a kid in the 80s and going into their stores. They actually had straw mixed into the cement flooring. I didn’t really start shopping there until I had to buy work clothes in my twenties and thirties.

But now their clothes are just way too over-priced for the blandness they offer. And the fit was way off. At first I just shopped at Club Monaco instead until they became super shitty as well. Then I went full on fast fashion with staples from Uniqlo and fun stylish pieces from Zara. I see Zara style shirts at BR for $130 (and you know they aren’t that much better).

The Zara in Barcelona is like heaven with their seemingly 39€ price for everything and they carry absolutely everything Zara makes. And Uniqlo used to have the absolute BEST fitting pants with their colored skinny elastic jeans which I am so pissed they just stopped making.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 73May 21, 2025 1:45 AM

R46 Zara would work with some of its assortment. They have a blazers, pants and great scarves & accessories. Price point is better too.

by Anonymousreply 74May 21, 2025 2:01 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!