Remind me again why they hid this guy away during the campaign? What do Democrats have against spines?
Tim Walz calls ICE "Trump's Gestapo", gets Republican panties in a collective twist
by Anonymous | reply 54 | May 20, 2025 10:42 PM |
Gee. Can't imagine why he was one of the biggest factors of losing.
by Anonymous | reply 1 | May 19, 2025 6:02 PM |
Give ir a rest 'orzik
by Anonymous | reply 2 | May 19, 2025 6:05 PM |
R1 Blue MAGA cucks taking accountability challenge Difficulty: Impossible
by Anonymous | reply 3 | May 19, 2025 6:07 PM |
they are
by Anonymous | reply 4 | May 19, 2025 6:07 PM |
R1 Y'all supported genocide and are cheering on fascism, but sure, Tim Walz advocating against price gouging is what held the Democrats back.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | May 19, 2025 6:08 PM |
They are Nazis and they are racists. What is so complicated about this?
by Anonymous | reply 6 | May 19, 2025 6:10 PM |
Warning: unpopular opinion ahead!
Vance exceeded my expectations debating Walz. He did well being Mr. Nice Guy while the cameras were rolling. Walz came nowhere near "owning" him.
In reality, Vance is creepy as hell, so many "issues" I don't think there is a "real" Vance.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | May 19, 2025 6:12 PM |
I agree. Vance was MUCH better coached than Walz. Walz comes across much better unscripted. Vance comes across horrendous unscripted.
by Anonymous | reply 8 | May 19, 2025 7:06 PM |
Ditto. I wish he had shown some of this "spine" when he had the most eyeballs on him at his debate.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | May 19, 2025 9:36 PM |
Okay, but Tim Walz is still the Webster Dictionary’s living definition of moron who fought to put tampons in boys’ bathrooms. You have him to thank for Trump. Not Kamala and not Biden.. Walz.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | May 19, 2025 10:12 PM |
R9 Wouldn’t have mattered because your girl Kamala would still go on The View to proclaim that there was no distinction between her and her enormously unpopular predecessor and shove a Cheney in the faces of Muslim voters in swing states while claiming she wanted to end the war. Nothing Walz could’ve done would’ve neutralized that level of retardation.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | May 19, 2025 10:17 PM |
Don't get me wrong, R11. I now don't believe Trump was going to be beat under any of the plausible scenarios. But that doesn't excuse Walz's woeful debate performance.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | May 19, 2025 10:42 PM |
It’s like all the Proud Boys on the down-low were in ICE and they’ve been set free to do as they will.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | May 19, 2025 11:11 PM |
R11/13: Walz didn't clinch that debate. Realizing that does not make one MAGA.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | May 19, 2025 11:28 PM |
That is exactly who they are emulating.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | May 20, 2025 12:08 AM |
Walz fell into every trap Vance set up for him. Just as Trump fell for every trap Harris set up for him.
A debate, Vance vs. Harris, would have been wild.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | May 20, 2025 1:02 AM |
He’s like Ted Danson continually returning in some new 2010s TV series—he’ll just never go away.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | May 20, 2025 1:21 AM |
Walz warned the VP vetting people that he was a terrible debater. So he's aware of it but seems unable to improve his performances.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | May 20, 2025 1:28 AM |
[quote]R9 Wouldn’t have mattered because your girl Kamala would still go on The View to proclaim that there was no distinction between her and her enormously unpopular predecessor and shove a Cheney in the faces of Muslim voters in swing states while claiming she wanted to end the war. Nothing Walz could’ve done would’ve neutralized that level of retardation.
Right, OP, it's Kamala's fault. Go play the blame game somewhere else.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | May 20, 2025 1:39 AM |
[quote] Wouldn’t have mattered because your girl Kamala would still go on The View to proclaim that there was no distinction between her and her enormously unpopular predecessor and shove a Cheney in the faces of Muslim voters in swing states while claiming she wanted to end the war. Nothing Walz could’ve done would’ve neutralized that level of retardation.
Agreed.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | May 20, 2025 2:32 AM |
R19 Even the blue MAGA cucks of Bluesky aren't blaming Walz for the loss, but the blue MAGA cucks of DL stand alone in delusional copium, projection, and lack of self-awareness.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | May 20, 2025 3:20 AM |
I'm not sure Walz will get all that far in 2028, but I do believe the Harris campaign went into some kind of inane panic and decided to shut him down. That's the problem with the whole DNC, always looking over its shoulder terrified that anybody is saying anything real and not vetted through a thousand committees and focus groups.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | May 20, 2025 3:55 AM |
What exactly is a blue MAGAt?
by Anonymous | reply 23 | May 20, 2025 5:04 AM |
R23 A new term that INCELs just love to inter into eject into every conversation.
Misery loves company and DL is the dame that can prove it
by Anonymous | reply 24 | May 20, 2025 5:12 AM |
interject^^^
by Anonymous | reply 25 | May 20, 2025 5:13 AM |
So in other words "blue MAGA" is a made-up, nonsensical term.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | May 20, 2025 5:15 AM |
I thought incels were already mostly MAGAts.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | May 20, 2025 5:19 AM |
R26 see MAGAT, Repug, tRUMP, Orange Man, Orange Turd . . .
by Anonymous | reply 28 | May 20, 2025 5:31 AM |
I’ve used the term blue MAGAt to describe those who exist entirely in a blue bubble & engage in their own preposterous conspiracy thinking.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | May 20, 2025 5:42 AM |
Waltz will get as far as Joe Lieberman, another failed Veep candidate who also sought the brass ring.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | May 20, 2025 5:44 AM |
Thanks, R29, I thought that you meant a registered Dem T supporter. I was shocked by seeing people wailing "They stabbed [bold]MY JOE[/bold] in the back!" when he was finally persuaded to withdraw after the decrepit debate performance. Or folks screaming Harris was victim of racism, after Obama elected twice. That sort of stuff.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | May 20, 2025 10:51 AM |
To be clear, R31, I was responding for myself; I hadn’t previously raised the term in this thread.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | May 20, 2025 11:16 AM |
R10, he’s neither a moron nor the reason for trump, asshole
by Anonymous | reply 33 | May 20, 2025 11:45 AM |
I like Tim Walz and I think if they hadn't muffled him, he could easily have offset his weak debate performance. He has a knack for saying what people are thinking.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | May 20, 2025 2:44 PM |
[quote] he could easily have offset his weak debate performance
But that was his most important & visible stage. And he blew it.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | May 20, 2025 4:35 PM |
He admitted that he was not a good debater before he was selected. So, whose fault is it for his bad debate performance?
by Anonymous | reply 36 | May 20, 2025 4:46 PM |
He's not wrong
by Anonymous | reply 37 | May 20, 2025 4:50 PM |
When are Republican panties NOT in a collective twist?
by Anonymous | reply 38 | May 20, 2025 4:51 PM |
[quote] He admitted that he was not a good debater before he was selected. So, whose fault is it for his bad debate performance?
Harris for picking him; Walz for being bad at his most important campaign task.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | May 20, 2025 5:00 PM |
He's absolutely right. They are the gestapo.
by Anonymous | reply 40 | May 20, 2025 5:20 PM |
[quote]Harris for picking him; Walz for being bad at his most important campaign task.
Such the drama queen, r39.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | May 20, 2025 5:40 PM |
Is that you, Gus?
by Anonymous | reply 42 | May 20, 2025 5:48 PM |
Since when do we pick candidates based on whether they do well on a debate stage? It's not the Tonys.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | May 20, 2025 6:00 PM |
Exactly, r44.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | May 20, 2025 6:04 PM |
Well, R44, it killed the chances of Richard Nixon, Joe Biden, and Tim.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | May 20, 2025 6:32 PM |
Which Tim was worse? Kaine or Walz?
by Anonymous | reply 47 | May 20, 2025 6:57 PM |
Kaine.
by Anonymous | reply 48 | May 20, 2025 7:26 PM |
Why blame anyone besides maggots and idiots who voted for a convicted felon, rapist and someone who stole top secret documents?
It’s not Tim or Kamala’s fault that people are stupid, lazy and don’t even give a shit about keeping their own heads above water.
by Anonymous | reply 49 | May 20, 2025 8:01 PM |
[Quote] Since when do we pick candidates based on whether they do well on a debate stage? It's not the Tonys.
Nobody watches the Tonys any more do they, but many people watch Presidential debates. And do you remember what happened after Trump and Biden's debate in 2024?
by Anonymous | reply 50 | May 20, 2025 8:02 PM |
[Quote] It’s not Tim or Kamala’s fault that people are stupid, lazy and don’t even give a shit about keeping their own heads above water.
But not stupid enough to believe that Joe was as sharp as a tack. and It was clear that Democrats and the media were covering up Joe's condition. Everything that we're hearing now isn't a surprise to voters.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | May 20, 2025 8:22 PM |
"The voters" are stupid and lazy ... except when Obama and Biden win.
by Anonymous | reply 52 | May 20, 2025 9:28 PM |
No. Voters are always stupid and lazy
It’s that organizers get them to the polls. Now, however, the thugs are passing hills to aggressively kick people off the voting rolls. Especially registered Democrats.
by Anonymous | reply 53 | May 20, 2025 9:36 PM |
[Quote] No. Voters are always stupid and lazy
you forgot racist and sexist R53
by Anonymous | reply 54 | May 20, 2025 10:42 PM |