Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Tim Walz calls ICE "Trump's Gestapo", gets Republican panties in a collective twist

Remind me again why they hid this guy away during the campaign? What do Democrats have against spines?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 54May 20, 2025 10:42 PM

Gee. Can't imagine why he was one of the biggest factors of losing.

by Anonymousreply 1May 19, 2025 6:02 PM

Give ir a rest 'orzik

by Anonymousreply 2May 19, 2025 6:05 PM

R1 Blue MAGA cucks taking accountability challenge Difficulty: Impossible

by Anonymousreply 3May 19, 2025 6:07 PM

they are

by Anonymousreply 4May 19, 2025 6:07 PM

R1 Y'all supported genocide and are cheering on fascism, but sure, Tim Walz advocating against price gouging is what held the Democrats back.

by Anonymousreply 5May 19, 2025 6:08 PM

They are Nazis and they are racists. What is so complicated about this?

by Anonymousreply 6May 19, 2025 6:10 PM

Warning: unpopular opinion ahead!

Vance exceeded my expectations debating Walz. He did well being Mr. Nice Guy while the cameras were rolling. Walz came nowhere near "owning" him.

In reality, Vance is creepy as hell, so many "issues" I don't think there is a "real" Vance.

by Anonymousreply 7May 19, 2025 6:12 PM

I agree. Vance was MUCH better coached than Walz. Walz comes across much better unscripted. Vance comes across horrendous unscripted.

by Anonymousreply 8May 19, 2025 7:06 PM

Ditto. I wish he had shown some of this "spine" when he had the most eyeballs on him at his debate.

by Anonymousreply 9May 19, 2025 9:36 PM

Okay, but Tim Walz is still the Webster Dictionary’s living definition of moron who fought to put tampons in boys’ bathrooms. You have him to thank for Trump. Not Kamala and not Biden.. Walz.

by Anonymousreply 10May 19, 2025 10:12 PM

R9 Wouldn’t have mattered because your girl Kamala would still go on The View to proclaim that there was no distinction between her and her enormously unpopular predecessor and shove a Cheney in the faces of Muslim voters in swing states while claiming she wanted to end the war. Nothing Walz could’ve done would’ve neutralized that level of retardation.

by Anonymousreply 11May 19, 2025 10:17 PM

Don't get me wrong, R11. I now don't believe Trump was going to be beat under any of the plausible scenarios. But that doesn't excuse Walz's woeful debate performance.

by Anonymousreply 12May 19, 2025 10:42 PM

It’s like all the Proud Boys on the down-low were in ICE and they’ve been set free to do as they will.

by Anonymousreply 13May 19, 2025 11:11 PM

R11/13: Walz didn't clinch that debate. Realizing that does not make one MAGA.

by Anonymousreply 14May 19, 2025 11:28 PM

That is exactly who they are emulating.

by Anonymousreply 15May 20, 2025 12:08 AM

Walz fell into every trap Vance set up for him. Just as Trump fell for every trap Harris set up for him.

A debate, Vance vs. Harris, would have been wild.

by Anonymousreply 16May 20, 2025 1:02 AM

He’s like Ted Danson continually returning in some new 2010s TV series—he’ll just never go away.

by Anonymousreply 17May 20, 2025 1:21 AM

Walz warned the VP vetting people that he was a terrible debater. So he's aware of it but seems unable to improve his performances.

by Anonymousreply 18May 20, 2025 1:28 AM

[quote]R9 Wouldn’t have mattered because your girl Kamala would still go on The View to proclaim that there was no distinction between her and her enormously unpopular predecessor and shove a Cheney in the faces of Muslim voters in swing states while claiming she wanted to end the war. Nothing Walz could’ve done would’ve neutralized that level of retardation.

Right, OP, it's Kamala's fault. Go play the blame game somewhere else.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19May 20, 2025 1:39 AM

[quote] Wouldn’t have mattered because your girl Kamala would still go on The View to proclaim that there was no distinction between her and her enormously unpopular predecessor and shove a Cheney in the faces of Muslim voters in swing states while claiming she wanted to end the war. Nothing Walz could’ve done would’ve neutralized that level of retardation.

Agreed.

by Anonymousreply 20May 20, 2025 2:32 AM

R19 Even the blue MAGA cucks of Bluesky aren't blaming Walz for the loss, but the blue MAGA cucks of DL stand alone in delusional copium, projection, and lack of self-awareness.

by Anonymousreply 21May 20, 2025 3:20 AM

I'm not sure Walz will get all that far in 2028, but I do believe the Harris campaign went into some kind of inane panic and decided to shut him down. That's the problem with the whole DNC, always looking over its shoulder terrified that anybody is saying anything real and not vetted through a thousand committees and focus groups.

by Anonymousreply 22May 20, 2025 3:55 AM

What exactly is a blue MAGAt?

by Anonymousreply 23May 20, 2025 5:04 AM

R23 A new term that INCELs just love to inter into eject into every conversation.

Misery loves company and DL is the dame that can prove it

by Anonymousreply 24May 20, 2025 5:12 AM

interject^^^

by Anonymousreply 25May 20, 2025 5:13 AM

So in other words "blue MAGA" is a made-up, nonsensical term.

by Anonymousreply 26May 20, 2025 5:15 AM

I thought incels were already mostly MAGAts.

by Anonymousreply 27May 20, 2025 5:19 AM

R26 see MAGAT, Repug, tRUMP, Orange Man, Orange Turd . . .

by Anonymousreply 28May 20, 2025 5:31 AM

I’ve used the term blue MAGAt to describe those who exist entirely in a blue bubble & engage in their own preposterous conspiracy thinking.

by Anonymousreply 29May 20, 2025 5:42 AM

Waltz will get as far as Joe Lieberman, another failed Veep candidate who also sought the brass ring.

by Anonymousreply 30May 20, 2025 5:44 AM

Thanks, R29, I thought that you meant a registered Dem T supporter. I was shocked by seeing people wailing "They stabbed [bold]MY JOE[/bold] in the back!" when he was finally persuaded to withdraw after the decrepit debate performance. Or folks screaming Harris was victim of racism, after Obama elected twice. That sort of stuff.

by Anonymousreply 31May 20, 2025 10:51 AM

To be clear, R31, I was responding for myself; I hadn’t previously raised the term in this thread.

by Anonymousreply 32May 20, 2025 11:16 AM

R10, he’s neither a moron nor the reason for trump, asshole

by Anonymousreply 33May 20, 2025 11:45 AM

I like Tim Walz and I think if they hadn't muffled him, he could easily have offset his weak debate performance. He has a knack for saying what people are thinking.

by Anonymousreply 34May 20, 2025 2:44 PM

[quote] he could easily have offset his weak debate performance

But that was his most important & visible stage. And he blew it.

by Anonymousreply 35May 20, 2025 4:35 PM

He admitted that he was not a good debater before he was selected. So, whose fault is it for his bad debate performance?

by Anonymousreply 36May 20, 2025 4:46 PM

He's not wrong

by Anonymousreply 37May 20, 2025 4:50 PM

When are Republican panties NOT in a collective twist?

by Anonymousreply 38May 20, 2025 4:51 PM

[quote] He admitted that he was not a good debater before he was selected. So, whose fault is it for his bad debate performance?

Harris for picking him; Walz for being bad at his most important campaign task.

by Anonymousreply 39May 20, 2025 5:00 PM

He's absolutely right. They are the gestapo.

by Anonymousreply 40May 20, 2025 5:20 PM

[quote]Harris for picking him; Walz for being bad at his most important campaign task.

Such the drama queen, r39.

by Anonymousreply 41May 20, 2025 5:40 PM

Is that you, Gus?

by Anonymousreply 42May 20, 2025 5:48 PM

Gus, you must remember this

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 43May 20, 2025 5:53 PM

Since when do we pick candidates based on whether they do well on a debate stage? It's not the Tonys.

by Anonymousreply 44May 20, 2025 6:00 PM

Exactly, r44.

by Anonymousreply 45May 20, 2025 6:04 PM

Well, R44, it killed the chances of Richard Nixon, Joe Biden, and Tim.

by Anonymousreply 46May 20, 2025 6:32 PM

Which Tim was worse? Kaine or Walz?

by Anonymousreply 47May 20, 2025 6:57 PM

Kaine.

by Anonymousreply 48May 20, 2025 7:26 PM

Why blame anyone besides maggots and idiots who voted for a convicted felon, rapist and someone who stole top secret documents?

It’s not Tim or Kamala’s fault that people are stupid, lazy and don’t even give a shit about keeping their own heads above water.

by Anonymousreply 49May 20, 2025 8:01 PM

[Quote] Since when do we pick candidates based on whether they do well on a debate stage? It's not the Tonys.

Nobody watches the Tonys any more do they, but many people watch Presidential debates. And do you remember what happened after Trump and Biden's debate in 2024?

by Anonymousreply 50May 20, 2025 8:02 PM

[Quote] It’s not Tim or Kamala’s fault that people are stupid, lazy and don’t even give a shit about keeping their own heads above water.

But not stupid enough to believe that Joe was as sharp as a tack. and It was clear that Democrats and the media were covering up Joe's condition. Everything that we're hearing now isn't a surprise to voters.

by Anonymousreply 51May 20, 2025 8:22 PM

"The voters" are stupid and lazy ... except when Obama and Biden win.

by Anonymousreply 52May 20, 2025 9:28 PM

No. Voters are always stupid and lazy

It’s that organizers get them to the polls. Now, however, the thugs are passing hills to aggressively kick people off the voting rolls. Especially registered Democrats.

by Anonymousreply 53May 20, 2025 9:36 PM

[Quote] No. Voters are always stupid and lazy

you forgot racist and sexist R53

by Anonymousreply 54May 20, 2025 10:42 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!