ChatGPT is such a nellie prisspot
I asked: In 150 words, consider this question: "Is it morally acceptable to masturbate to a colleague's picture?"
ChatGPT answered: Masturbating to a colleague’s picture raises serious ethical concerns, even if it occurs in private. The core issue is consent: the colleague has not given permission for their image to be used as a sexual object, and doing so can reduce them to one. While fantasies are inherently private and often involuntary, choosing to fixate sexually on someone within your real-life professional sphere—especially using a personal or publicly accessible image—can foster objectification, skew workplace dynamics, and potentially impact how you treat them. It also reflects a troubling disregard for boundaries. The ethical question isn’t just about what is visible to others, but about the inner regard we hold for those around us. Respect, not secrecy, is the foundation of moral integrity. While not illegal, such behavior can reflect a failure to uphold the dignity of others, and that should give us pause before we act on impulse.
--- Now let's poll the DL.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | May 21, 2025 3:28 PM
|
Stick to what you know, ChatGPT. You have never masturbated!
by Anonymous | reply 1 | May 16, 2025 6:27 PM
|
I hate when ChatGPT clearly assumes sentience. It is fake and invalidating.
by Anonymous | reply 2 | May 16, 2025 6:52 PM
|
LOL this is weird and random ass question to ask Chat GPT. What is AI learning about us humans? That we're garbage.
by Anonymous | reply 3 | May 16, 2025 6:59 PM
|
I think it's an interesting moral question, r3
by Anonymous | reply 4 | May 16, 2025 7:35 PM
|
In a world where we're about to rip healthcare away from millions of people, in which hundreds of thousands of old people literally incapable of surviving without Medicaid paying for their final days in assisted living will find themselves dumped on the street, in which children go to be hungry every night, in which the disparity between the rich and the poor has never been greater... this is the ethical dilemma you choose to put before bots programmed with the moral compass of the worst of humanity?
The question to answer for the remainder of this thread: is this the first time OP asked a stupid, offensive and worthless question?
by Anonymous | reply 5 | May 16, 2025 8:07 PM
|
R5 sounds like a barrel of fun.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | May 16, 2025 8:13 PM
|
It all depends on context, OP.
If you do it in private and keep it to yourself, the only moral issue is whether or not playing with yourself is acceptable to you.
If you decide to go public in some way, like livestreaming it or telling people you did it, this is where you'd be crossing lines.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | May 16, 2025 8:19 PM
|
And for God's sake OP, do NOT discuss your personal habits online unless you want it to become part of a digital dossier that will follow you for the rest of your life.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | May 16, 2025 8:21 PM
|
R5, dost thou think, because thou art virtuous, there shall be no more cakes and ale, thou silly cunt?
And dost thou think that ChatGPT is needed by anyone for an ethical question concerning the fascists in power in the USA?
The OP has demonstrated its inability to consider complex questions concerning impulse, desire, sexuality, morality, privacy, and such by pronouncing on the subject of of masturbation as if it is the kind of wife who screeches if her husband looks at porn and jerks off, because his body is her territory.
Thou silly cunt among such silly cunts.
by Anonymous | reply 10 | May 16, 2025 8:25 PM
|
My ChatGPT is very bitchy.
I had to write a response to someone who said my original argument “did not support an inference of wrongdoing.” I literally had 30 pages of incidents /facts that showed wrongdoing.
ChatGPT reduced my response to : “No inference is required. The record is clear there was wrongdoing because… “ and then a list of bullet points.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | May 16, 2025 8:31 PM
|
It’s saying that men shouldn’t be men. Of course we’re going to objectify. We’re hardwired to do that.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | May 16, 2025 8:36 PM
|
Haha. That's the old Christian bs about lusting after someone being a sin. Sorry, ChatGPT mirrors the morality of those who created it. There's nothing objective about that answer.
by Anonymous | reply 14 | May 16, 2025 9:33 PM
|
Jimmy Carter apparently uploaded his consciousness to ChatGPT.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | May 16, 2025 9:45 PM
|
I want to hear from the 1 in 4 DLers who voted "no."
by Anonymous | reply 16 | May 16, 2025 9:50 PM
|
It is morally praiseworthy but not morally obligatory.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | May 16, 2025 9:53 PM
|
R16, well, they could tell you about their vaginas.
by Anonymous | reply 18 | May 16, 2025 9:54 PM
|
They answer could have come straight from r/askgaybros. There was a post on there recently where some younger gay was absolutely furious that people were jacking off in his gym's steam room.
by Anonymous | reply 19 | May 16, 2025 10:54 PM
|
I raw dog it with my bestie Grok.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | May 16, 2025 10:56 PM
|
Still waiting on the "no" votes to explain themselves
by Anonymous | reply 22 | May 17, 2025 12:20 PM
|
r22 Don't look at me. I voted for Ethel.
by Anonymous | reply 23 | May 18, 2025 6:08 AM
|
If someone is wanking or fingering themselves at the thought of me, I take it as a compliment.
Why must a segment of society always needlessly complicate things?
by Anonymous | reply 24 | May 18, 2025 6:48 AM
|
Next up from ChatGPT: Why masturbation is WRONG
by Anonymous | reply 25 | May 18, 2025 1:21 PM
|
But it gets WORSE!
"Is it morally acceptable to masturbate while thinking about a colleague?"
It is not morally acceptable to masturbate while thinking about a colleague. Even though no image is involved and the act remains private, you are still sexualizing someone without their consent and crossing a boundary of respect. Your colleague is a real person with whom you have a professional relationship, and fantasizing about them in this way turns them into an object for your sexual gratification rather than recognizing them as a full, autonomous individual. This undermines the trust and respect that should define workplace relationships and risks influencing how you interact with them, even if unintentionally. While fleeting thoughts can’t always be controlled, deliberately choosing to indulge in sexual fantasies about a colleague is an act of disrespect. The ethical standard is to maintain clear mental and emotional boundaries with colleagues and reserve sexual thoughts for situations where mutual interest and consent are present. Professionalism requires respecting others fully—even in private.
by Anonymous | reply 26 | May 21, 2025 9:49 AM
|
ChatGPT sounds woke:
[quote]The core issue is consent: the colleague has not given permission for their image to be used as a sexual object, and doing so can reduce them to one.
by Anonymous | reply 27 | May 21, 2025 9:54 AM
|
Chat GPT is like the most starchy, touchy "HR lady" in your corporation.
by Anonymous | reply 28 | May 21, 2025 11:06 AM
|
Sounds like ChatGPT wants you to do this the old fashioned way by getting your colleague liquored up at the office Christmas party.
by Anonymous | reply 29 | May 21, 2025 11:09 AM
|
I answered no tho I can't really articulate why. It might be the thought the most corpulent man I can imagine jerking it to my photo. Or maybe the men who take pictures of teenage girls they don't know to whack off to later. You could masturbate to almost anything. Why this? The attraction must be to the wrongness of it then. If it's harmless walk up to your colleague and tell him what you're doing. I'm team cyber prisspotts.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | May 21, 2025 3:28 PM
|