Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Prince Harry Loses Appeal Over U.K. Security Detail

The Duke of Sussex had appeared in court last month to appeal the decision to downgrade his taxpayer-funded security arrangements while in Britain, describing the country as “central to the heritage” of his children.

On Friday, the Duke lost his appeal challenging the decision. High court judge Geoffrey Vos said the arguments put forward on behalf of Harry were “powerful” and said it was “plain” he had felt “badly treated” by the system. But, he added, there was no legal basis to challenge Ravec’s decision.

“The conclusion in my judgement… was that the Duke of Sussex’s appeal would be dismissed.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35May 6, 2025 5:35 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1May 2, 2025 4:13 PM

No special treatment for Harry and he has to pay court cost.

by Anonymousreply 2May 2, 2025 4:18 PM

Welp.

I guess Meghan and the kids will never step foot in the UK ever again.

by Anonymousreply 3May 2, 2025 4:21 PM

No sympathy. He does nothing to help the country so why should they pay for his security. He's living in Montecito with Oprah and Rob Lowe as his neighbors. He isn't hurting for money. Let him pay for his own security.

by Anonymousreply 4May 2, 2025 4:24 PM

The only threat to either of them in the UK is being booed. That's what they're afraid of.

by Anonymousreply 5May 2, 2025 4:28 PM

How would men with guns help protect them against boos and hisses?

by Anonymousreply 6May 2, 2025 4:30 PM

[quote] Why Princess Lilibet and Prince Archie Will Likely Never Go to the U.K. Again

Prince Harry has lost his bid to reinstate his security on visits to the U.K., a judge ruled today—which marks the end of the Duke of Sussex’s legal challenge to a 2020 decision by the U.K. government that denied Harry, wife Meghan Markle, and kids Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet automatic taxpayer-funded security while in Harry’s home country after Harry and Meghan stepped back from their roles as working members of the royal family five years ago.

The 21-page decision came down on May 2 in a no doubt devastating blow to Harry; as he previously told People about this court case, “This one has always mattered the most.” Harry was in the U.K. just last month for an appeal on the original ruling, and that decision was made public Friday.

Though Harry will occasionally travel to the U.K. for engagements (and sometimes for court cases), the Duke of Sussex has previously expressed that, without security, he does not feel comfortable bringing Meghan, Archie, and Lilibet to his home country for fears of their safety.

Judge Sir Geoffrey Vos dismissed Harry’s appeal, adding that two other judges agreed with his opinion, per People. As he delivered the verdict, Vos said, “The Duke was, in effect, stepping in and out of the cohort of protection provided by RAVEC (the Royal and VIP Executive Committee).

Outside the U.K., he was outside the cohort, but when in the U.K., his security would be considered as appropriate depending on the circumstances. It was impossible, I said in my judgment, to say that this reasoning was illogical or inappropriate. Indeed, it seemed sensible.”

As Harry left court April 9 after fighting for the appeal, he told People he was “exhausted and overwhelmed.” Harry has, per his legal team, described his fight for his and his family’s security as a fight for his life, and this ruling will likely mean that Harry’s visits to the U.K. will continue to be limited, and that Meghan, Archie, and Lilibet’s visits will likely be nonexistent.

After the appeal hearing on April 8 and 9, Harry said that his “worst fears have been confirmed by the whole legal disclosure in this case—and that’s really sad.”

Harry has long argued that RAVEC failed to assess the risks that Harry and his family uniquely face, and RAVEC’s case-by-case arrangement was something Harry’s team has called “inadequate, inappropriate, and ineffective.”

In December 2023, Harry told the High Court that “the U.K. is central to the heritage of my children and a place I want them to feel at home as much as where they live at the moment in the U.S. That cannot happen if it's not possible to keep them safe when they are on U.K. soil.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 7May 2, 2025 4:39 PM

who is footing the legal fees?

by Anonymousreply 8May 2, 2025 4:43 PM

Ha, ha!

by Anonymousreply 9May 2, 2025 4:46 PM

Isn’t the issue that private security (paid for my him) would not be allowed to carry guns in the UK? He seems dumb and I don’t like his wife, but more and more I’m starting to think I’d rather live next door to them than Will and Kate. But none of them are particularly impressive. I liked Kate if only for her ability to remain thin until she stopped doing any work.

by Anonymousreply 10May 2, 2025 4:55 PM

[quote]who is footing the legal fees?

Harry is, now that he lost.

by Anonymousreply 11May 2, 2025 5:03 PM

The issue is that Harry is an idiot who doesn't understand the consequences of his own actions, particularly the fact that he's no longer a working royal. Not only that, he's demanding even more security than he would have got as a working royal living in the UK.

by Anonymousreply 12May 2, 2025 5:04 PM

Great news!!

But now Harry will likely appeal to the UK Supreme Court.

Hope he loses again to finally end this nonsense.

by Anonymousreply 13May 2, 2025 5:05 PM

Isn’t it unsaid but true that Kate is still too sick and weak to do much more than raise their kids and get better?

And that’s not nothing.

by Anonymousreply 14May 2, 2025 5:06 PM

Very unlikely he'd appeal to the Supreme Court. He'd need High Court permission.

by Anonymousreply 15May 2, 2025 5:08 PM

[quote] Why Princess Lilibet and Prince Archie Will Likely Never Go to the U.K. Again

And why it’s ridiculous for the two U.S. residents to continue to have British royal titles. William must remove the Sussexes, root and branch.

by Anonymousreply 16May 2, 2025 5:10 PM

And he's losing his hair ... rapidly.

by Anonymousreply 17May 2, 2025 5:15 PM

R14, that’s possible. But maybe not probable? Obviously, she has no obligation to disclose her medical status. But she volunteered tidbits such are “preventative chemotherapy,” so I’m choosing to take her at her word and assume she’s not that sick.

I saw that she lightened her hair, so maybe that’s a good sign. Women do that to make concealing gray easier, so hopefully she has a long term outlook. I don’t wish her ill, I’ve just gotten tired of outlets like the Daily Mail presenting her farts as accomplishments and interpreting anything her sister in law does in the worst possible light.

by Anonymousreply 18May 2, 2025 5:19 PM

Thoughts & Prayers Harry!

by Anonymousreply 19May 2, 2025 5:30 PM

The only reason they want security restored is to go everywhere in huge ass motorcades and have security detail with wires so that they will look important.

And they hide behind the excuse that their children will need security. Well, the response should be a full-stop 'no' to British taxpayer paid security, and, if you are concerned about your children maybe adjust your pathetic attempt to be 'famous celebrities' in America, since they bring nothing of merit to underpin their desired 'celebrity'.

by Anonymousreply 20May 2, 2025 5:31 PM

Security concerns? Gee Harry, maybe it wasn’t a good idea to brag about your Taliban kill count in your book.

by Anonymousreply 21May 2, 2025 5:44 PM

[quote] Buckingham Palace has issued a rare statement after Prince Harry lost an appeal Friday to regain taxpayer-funded security in the UK and later told the BBC that he wanted to reconcile with his family.

[quote]“All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion,” a Palace spokesperson said of the decision to strip Harry of his security detail.

Boom!

by Anonymousreply 22May 2, 2025 11:06 PM

When Harry left his country and royal duty to settle in another country, he could not take the perks of High Station with him. America does not treat him as a High Prince. Here he is just another guy who left something and wrote a bad book.

by Anonymousreply 23May 2, 2025 11:27 PM

This interview will just likely make his father even angrier, since Harry has now confirmed what the Palace has so far repeatedly refused to do: that the King's cancer diagnosis is fatal. Everyone pretty much knows that at this point, but the Palace nor any members of the royal family have officially admitted that until now, and now Harry has blown it once again.

And to add insult to injury, he told the BBC he's "forgiven" his father, as if their estrangement had been somehow his father's fault.

by Anonymousreply 24May 2, 2025 11:39 PM

Dying of Cancer? If true, he's certainly not showing it

In the last 4 months - italy and the Vatican, Finland, France and Japan. And yet he'll be in Canada at the end of the month.

by Anonymousreply 25May 3, 2025 12:44 AM

[quote]This interview will just likely make his father even angrier, since Harry has now confirmed what the Palace has so far repeatedly refused to do: that the King's cancer diagnosis is fatal.

I would not take Harry's saying as any confirmation of reality whatsoever. Nonetheless, it is tasteless for this privacy-protector to go on in public about his father's illness and imminent death.

by Anonymousreply 26May 3, 2025 1:17 AM

[quote]...interpreting anything her sister in law does in the worst possible light.

There really is no other light in which to see Meghan's actions.

by Anonymousreply 27May 3, 2025 1:19 AM

I don’t think anyone has told Harry about Charles’ prognosis.

by Anonymousreply 28May 3, 2025 1:31 AM

^ They'd be crazy to do so, he'd take it straight to People mag.

by Anonymousreply 29May 3, 2025 2:21 AM

King Charles has terminal cancer.

Meghan: Has anyone asked how I'M doing???!!!

by Anonymousreply 30May 3, 2025 4:06 AM

R24 Harry knows nothing about his father’s illness other than he has cancer. He is not given information due to his running to the press and violating other people’s privacy.

Harry sad he doesn’t know how long his father will live. His father is 76. My sister is 76, doesn't have cancer and I don’t know how long she will live. I’m 65, without a terminal illness and I don’t know how long I will live. When you live long enough to be elderly, there is a real possibility that that your life will be ending sooner rather than later. It’s not some mystery.

by Anonymousreply 31May 4, 2025 11:09 PM

Said ^

by Anonymousreply 32May 4, 2025 11:09 PM

Harry might not know specifics, but he probably knows the type of cancer his father has. Charles, wily old duffer, might have given him just enough information during their very brief in-person visit post-diagnosis, to see what Harry does with the information.

I don’t think Harry meant to leak anything to the BBC, he was just hyped up on his own grievances.

Charles’ cancer is likely “not curable” but hopefully can be managed for years to come.

by Anonymousreply 33May 6, 2025 3:57 PM

Sad-he only has 60+million left

by Anonymousreply 34May 6, 2025 4:00 PM

[quote]Sad-he only has 60+million left

Not to worry 'H', I've got this! I've sold 60 jars of 'jam soup'!

by Anonymousreply 35May 6, 2025 5:35 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!