Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Diana Ross & The (Faux) Supremes "Return to Love" Tour (2000)

25 years ago this Spring, Arthur Fogel, head of concert promotions for TNA/SFX (now Live Nation Entertainment), was struggling to get an already announced 'Diana Ross and the Supremes Reunion Tour' on the road for 29 dates that summer, but there was a major problem - Ross' former Supremes weren't interested in touring with her. As a matter of fact, Cindy Birdsong and Mary Wilson were so insulted by the final offer from Fogel ($4M for Wilson, $2M for Birdsong while Ross was reportedly offered $15M), they dropped out a few months before the tour was to start. Ross did little to smooth it out (she officially said negotiations were not a 'group' effort, but individual efforts between each singer and Fogel), but forged ahead looking for two women to back her up.

Of all the women who could say they were officially a 'Supreme' (Ross left in 1969 to kick off her solo career in January, 1970 and there was a rotation of 'Supremes' until they officially disbanded and retired the name in 1977), two were finally hired to back up Ross on the tour: Lynda Laurence and Scherrie Payne who never performed with Ross. Because of this seismic shift, the title of the tour dropped 'Reunion' and retitled it 'Return to Love' tour.

An official 'major press announcement' was made on April 4, 2000 and Ross, Payne, and Laurence hit the talk shows to publicize it right after. There was even a 'VH1 Divas Live: A Tribute to Diana Ross' special in mid-April to promote the heavily-invested upcoming tour. Tickets went on sale immediately, as the tour dates were unveiled and it was to kick off on June 14, 2000 in Philadelphia and tour for 29 dates throughout the summer. It was being billed as one of the most anticipated 'music events' of the summer.

By the end of May, reality set in: no one wanted to see a 'reunion tour' without the three surviving Supremes from the 60s. Tickets were not selling. Fogel grew worried. The numbers from the box offices all over America weren't good. To top it off, Mary Wilson was giving interviews as to why she didn't join the tour, and her responses to answers were not nice - she said how she was 'disrespected' during negotiations, and she was 'mistreated' by the promoters.

Philadelphia sold 9,000 of the 13,000 seats available. Columbus Ohio sold 3,000 out of 13,000 seats on June20. Tampa sold 5,000 out of 15,000 seats. The tour was averaging 5,000 - 8,000 seats per night when the venues could fit 10,000 - 20,000 fans. Reviews were pretty harsh. As one critic said, "It would be like Paul McCartney teaming up with three male singers he never performed with before, and calling it a 'Beatles Reunion' tour.

The 'reunion' played its last date in New York City at MSG on July 6. The next day, it was announced the rest of the summer US tour was officially canceled (16 dates out of 30 announced). Discussions for the tour to continue in the UK in the fall of 2000 came to an end. Ross announced to the press that she was "severely disappointed" in the cancellation.

Any DLers go to any of the concerts ? What are some of your memories from 25 years ago ?

by Anonymousreply 19April 28, 2025 11:42 AM

I like Diana Ross but that was a cunt move. She needed to magnanimous and offer the same salaries to the two supremes.

by Anonymousreply 1April 27, 2025 7:15 PM

I remember how badly it was rolled out. Idk why they couldn't just create a more equitable deal to get Wilson and Birdsong on board and everyone would've made a ton of money. Greed is just so stupid.

by Anonymousreply 2April 27, 2025 7:17 PM

R1 Agree - but we all know Ross believed she was 'the star' and Wilson and Birdsong were nothing. It's all about ego.

by Anonymousreply 3April 27, 2025 7:17 PM

R2 Again, I think it's more EGO than Greed. It would have been quite an ordeal managing three big egos on a tour, no matter how much they were all paid.

by Anonymousreply 4April 27, 2025 7:18 PM

If she'd asked, I would have loaned her a couple of Pips.

by Anonymousreply 5April 27, 2025 7:34 PM

I'd have done it for some food stamps and a half a pound of government cheese

by Anonymousreply 6April 27, 2025 7:36 PM

This could have been a huge, huge money maker for all three of them, as well as promoters, if it had been handled correctly.

I envisioned an opening act of new Supreme (post Diana Ross) songs). i.e Stoned Love, Up the Ladder to the Roof, Floy Joy. Act II Diana Ross solo and her solo hits; than as a huge finale, Diana and the Supremes reunited to do their classic1960s hits, leading off with Someday *(We'll Be Together).

by Anonymousreply 7April 27, 2025 7:44 PM

[quote]As a matter of fact, Cindy Birdsong and Mary Wilson were so insulted by the final offer from Fogel ($4M for Wilson, $2M for Birdsong while Ross was reportedly offered $15M), they dropped out a few months before the tour was to start.

They weren't insulted by the final offer. They were insulted by the initial offer ($1 million for Mary, and even less for Cindy). When they finally accepted the final offer of $4 million (including $2 million from Diana's personal acct), and $1 million respectively, TNA/SFX went to clear it with Diana, and reported back that "the train has left the station."

by Anonymousreply 8April 27, 2025 8:55 PM

[quote]but we all know Ross believed she was 'the star' and Wilson and Birdsong were nothing.

What do you mean believed? Mary Wilson didn't sing lead on one Supremes song during their 60's hitmaking heyday. She had 0 hits and 0 charting albums as a solo artist since leaving the Supremes in 1977. Her one claim to fame was writing a book about Diana Ross. On what planet did people think she should have been paid 4 million dollars for a tour?

All of the members of The Beatles by contrast had hit solo albums with hit songs that charted in the Top 40.

Cindy actually wanted to take the offer, but Mary didn't tell them that while she was fighting for a bigger piece of the pie for HERSELF.

As Tony Turner said, there were two bitches in The Supremes.

by Anonymousreply 9April 27, 2025 9:06 PM

And the other two women were Supremes. For Mary Wilson to call them faux Supremes was disingenuous, especially since she worked with them during the Ross-less years. She basically dismissed the post Ross years where she was the frontwoman of the group.

by Anonymousreply 10April 27, 2025 9:12 PM

Don't forget and always remember that the group singing on "Someday, We'll Be Together" was actually just Miss Diane and some studio singers backing her up. Not a Supreme in sight.

Miss Diane would not have been happy sharing the stage with Jean Terrell and hearing the audience give Jean an ovation for her vocals on "Up The Ladder To the Roof."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 11April 27, 2025 9:16 PM

Diana should’ve just toured herself at smaller venues and not brought any of the other former Supremes into it. What did she honestly think Mary’s and Cindy’s reaction would be to be so lowballed? I’ve never heard Cindy accepted the offer, and we all know Diana did all the singing, but the disparity in money is insulting.

by Anonymousreply 12April 27, 2025 9:45 PM

If I were Mary or Cindy, I would have swallowed my pride and just taken the offer. I doubt they were getting similar offers on their own, and if the tour ended up being gangbusters, who knows what could have happened for them after that.

by Anonymousreply 13April 27, 2025 9:48 PM

R13 according to the other poster, Cindy accepted the offer. I guess she really needed the money. But I think the entire thing with Mary was she knew it was going to be less, but that much LESS than Diana was getting?! Between Live Nation and Diana they could’ve easily paid the two more, considering how people felt about the three of them during their heyday. Plus, even with the three, it’s doubtful they could’ve sold out all of those venues.

by Anonymousreply 14April 27, 2025 10:17 PM

I worked with Mary Wilson at the time, and Mary was pissed because she had heard that Diana was floating around the idea of a reunion all summer long, but hadn't heard a peep from Diana until late 1999. Mary's reaction was, "It took you long enough!" which probably didn't come across nice, but damn, Diana left the group in 1969-70, and Mary carried the Supremes torch through several iterations and even owned 50% of the Supremes name. You would think she'd be one of the first Diana would call.

Mary excitedly wanted to discuss with Diane tour plans, setlists, costuming, money, etc., but Diane said, "No, no, we can discuss this after negotiations (with TNA/SFX)."

Mary and Cindy were well aware of their worth compared to superstar Diana, so they weren't expecting equal pay. The $1 million initially offered to Mary was equal to what Mary had earned the previous year in performance fees, but she was no dummy. This reunion was an EVENT, so she expected and demanded more.

by Anonymousreply 15April 28, 2025 12:35 AM

There was public animosity directed against Diana Ross and no one wanted to pay those prices to see Diana Ross' diva antics. People wanted to see The Supremes, or what was left of the group.

by Anonymousreply 16April 28, 2025 12:39 AM

I think the tour still wouldn’t have been huge if Cindy and Mary did accept. Unless people bought tix on droves to see an onstage brawl between Diana and Mary—which probably would’ve happened at least once or twice. Even by 2000, I don’t believe enough general concerts-attending public would’ve been interested in paying to see former Supremes asking high prices to be seen in huge arena-sized venues where the original ‘60s lineups never appeared at.

Plus can you imagine what Wilson would’ve had to say if she’d have not been permitted to weigh in on the backing vocal and choreography arrangements, her and Cindy’s mic volumes, their costumes, the songs chosen, their solos, or Diana presenting the songs only as she’d been doing as a soloist for the previous 30 years, and then some distancing herself by almost a mile from the other two on the tour’s aircraft carrier sized-stages? Uhm…nope.

by Anonymousreply 17April 28, 2025 1:24 AM

Mary gave up the rights to the Supremes name in the late 70's to Motown in return for an album deal. After her first album flopped, they dropped her from the label.

by Anonymousreply 18April 28, 2025 1:30 AM

Did anyone here attend any of the concerts they did do between June 14 - July 6 ?

by Anonymousreply 19April 28, 2025 11:42 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!