Is a suit, tie and no socks now becoming acceptable or fashionable?

Socks are disappearing for executive leaders. I don’t understand it and I hate it. How can people not wear socks. But it is becoming much more common.

You bet he's gone commando! He's freeswinging and ready for action anywhere, anytime!

I don't have calcetinephobia like most of you, but those don't look like shoes I would wear without socks. It looks as if he might be wearing those socks you're not supposed to see. The right foot looks as if one of those socks is rising above the back of his shoe. But it's all black, so who knows for sure?

That's an absurd look. Sockless with a casual summer suit over a collarless shirt, and (the important part) loafers is fine.

But worsted suiting with a tie and Oxfords? No, girl, no.

[quote]No, girl, no.

Please, girl, please.

It's been a thing in CA for a while now. I don't love it.

It’s not “no socks”. The socks are cut low for a sockless look. It’s been a thing for years.

The no socks thing is fine for casual dress-up - sport coat, dress shirt (no tie), etc. It's also fine for younger men in more fashionable wear at a fancy event.

However, administration officials, executives, and others at the same level should NOT be wearing a youthful fashion like this.

If so, then open up dress for those positions to include more color and other variations. But you can't have a blue suit, white dress shirt, red tie Republican uniform with no socks - it looks stupid and makes you look even dumber.

Socks?

The sockless look with a suit and tie, only works if the guy is wearing high-heels. And then the pants should be raised in order to show more ankle.

[quote]The no socks thing is fine for casual dress-up - sport coat, dress shirt (no tie), etc. It's also fine for younger men in more fashionable wear at a fancy event.

The old fashion rules are dead.

Common white trash.

The Real World 🌎 Economic Summit

[quote] Makes you wonder if he's commando while attending to job duties.

Hot!

R10, that picture is an abomination.

Everybody knows that with a suit, you don't do..... up the bottom button.

It’s a requirement

[QUOTE]It looks as if he might be wearing those socks you're not supposed to see.

[QUOTE]It’s not “no socks”. The socks are cut low for a sockless look. It’s been a thing for years.

They're called "peds" which women have been using forever with flat or low heel shoes.

Wouldn't these peds be insufficiently manly for this administration? Doesn't it feminize him?

R17 - peds are still inappropriate at a World Summit.

Your feet get too sweaty without socks.

Maybe Rachel likes his feet that way so she can do a performative tableau of Mary Magdalene (Rachel) crying as she anoints Jesus's (Sean's) feet with fragrant oils and her trear drops as she wipes his unhygienic feet clean with her extensions.

It could happen, you know. And it might wind up on Instagram.

It looks like some surfer dude had an "important adult" appointment/meeting, and borrowed a suit and tie from someone...but at the last moment before he was to leave for the meeting, realizes "dude, I got no socks, man!"

Then he shrugged his head, figured the suit and tie was good enough and decided to just go sockless.

You know he totally would have worn flip flops if he could've gotten away with it.

It looks terrible and unprofessional. It wouldn't surprise me if he got a memo from the White House to put some socks on. It's the sort of thing Teump pays attention to.

I don’t want to think of the foot odor.

And it looks sloppy as hell.

I think they're no-show socks.

Is a supercalifragilistic expi alidocious?

Sean Duffy (even with sockless feet) is the least objectionable of Dump's cabinet choices.