[quote]R103: You can do something and cross the line of no return. His piece: 'I have my concerns': David Ignatius says Biden shouldn't run again
Mmm, I wasn't aware of that one, I guess mainly because I don't watch Joe & Mika if I can possibly avoid it; I detest them. And it was a hard slog, watching that excerpt.
What Ignatius expressed is an opinion, one which I did not share (and still don't, not really). Unpleasantly, it's from September 13, 2023, and that's shockingly early. Giving voice to it, he's probably among those who started that ball rolling. Prior to his contribution, it seems to have been just murmurs.
[quote]It was clearly a "hit" piece and published at a very, VERY, contentious time. Either he was directly assigned to write the piece by his editors and/or he was "paid off" by some "get Biden out" type of coalition, IMHO. I've never forgiven him for that piece and its timing.
I'm not so sure. I think he probably thought at the time - and even now would probably protest - that he was expressing his own opinion, independently of any pressure or urging. But Joe himself alludes to the odd phenomenon of lots of associates musing about Biden's qualifications when cameras were off, and IMO, that's the effect of targeted propaganda being disseminated by social media - on that goddamned small screen they all spend an unhealthy amount of time browsing. When an idea seems to be subtly percolating, coming from every direction at once, that's an indication of a propaganda rollout. It's a steady, insidious pressure. And its point of origin is online troll brigades.
Different groups of voters receive somewhat different targeted messaging, hitting them where they are in terms of their specific concerns. For instance, young people concerned about the Palestinian plight were slowly, steadily fed the notion that Biden/Harris were totally unacceptable because of their support for Israel, that one could not cast votes for them in good conscience. Millions of voters stayed home because of that, or made no choice at the top of the ticket. This benefited Trump.
"Concerns about Biden's abilities" (shades of Susan Collins) seem to have been another rollout, causing Dems to hesitate, to falter. And later, when that June 27 debate was held, there was a sudden surge of perception shaping, where many thousands of social media posts reinforced an imposed narrative that Biden was too enfeebled to continue. It almost didn't take - there had to follow weeks of steady pressure, placing that perception on endless repeat, sprinkled with ridicule and invective. One by one, different respected Dems - Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and others - fell prey to the social media-borne pressure and added their voices to it. I cannot remember when I've been that disappointed.
Maybe that's the reason I'm not so quick to write David Ignatius off, not yet. I think he and lots of others made a mistake, a really bad one, and didn't recognize social media psy-ops when they encountered them. I'm endeavoring not to respond to their failures emotionally. Once the Dems have recovered and righted themselves, then we'll see what positions they take.