Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

At the National Science Foundation, you can now have your grant pulled if you use certain words like "LGBT" or "women"

This is crazy, apparently you can do research on men but not women...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 42April 28, 2025 10:08 PM

So can everyone stop pretending this is about abuses, or exaggerations, or taxpayers' money, and it is 100% about being pro-racism, pro-misogyny, and pro-homophobia?

Concerned yet, Susan Collins?

by Anonymousreply 1February 4, 2025 5:27 PM

Same at NIH. They have been informed internally to ignore the judicial restraining orders and are still enforcing the gag order that was supposed to have ended this weekend. Oh and they’ve removed the ability to approve or request no cost extensions from their website and will be scanning all applications for references to sex, race and/or ethnicity.

by Anonymousreply 2February 4, 2025 5:33 PM

Oh my god.

by Anonymousreply 3February 4, 2025 6:52 PM

Only words allowed are "straight white men."

by Anonymousreply 4February 4, 2025 6:54 PM

I mean I only have to look at Datalounge to see a glaringly obvious problem with misogyny. Previously you got downvoted for calling it out.

by Anonymousreply 5February 4, 2025 7:19 PM

R5 thinks this is Reddit.

by Anonymousreply 6February 4, 2025 7:34 PM

OP, you really think "this is crazy?" This is the new norm. Trump does whatever the fuck he wants, and anyone in federal government of any branch has no say. He's been in office only about 2 weeks - he's just getting started. God help us.

by Anonymousreply 7February 4, 2025 7:36 PM

R5 Nope.

by Anonymousreply 8February 4, 2025 7:49 PM

That was supposed to be R6 Nope.

by Anonymousreply 9February 4, 2025 7:49 PM

You don't actually give a rat's ass r5.

Leave the cult.

by Anonymousreply 10February 4, 2025 7:50 PM

Take your meds, R10.

by Anonymousreply 11February 4, 2025 7:53 PM

Article re NSF

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 12February 4, 2025 9:36 PM

grants.gov was just taken down with no notice. Allegedly it will be back up on Monday.

by Anonymousreply 13February 6, 2025 2:04 PM

Oh that note was just exposed as the LIE that it is. Fucking Leon.

by Anonymousreply 14February 6, 2025 2:26 PM

Use "dames" to get around the use of the word "women."

Similarly, instead of "LGBT" use the 19th century word "invert".

by Anonymousreply 15February 6, 2025 2:37 PM

Fuck you Elmo.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 16February 8, 2025 12:24 AM

NIH backs down from illegal funding freeze.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 17February 12, 2025 8:17 PM

Turd doesn't want to be POTUS. He's contracted it all out to Project 2025. He'll just host dignitaries, and do press conferences, rallies and Palm Beach weekends.

by Anonymousreply 18February 12, 2025 9:00 PM

NSF director that Trump appointed resigns.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19April 24, 2025 9:22 PM

This is what winning looks like.

Just think if the Biden admin had spent 25% of this effort putting Trump away things would look so much different today.

by Anonymousreply 20April 24, 2025 9:33 PM

[quote]apparently you can do research on men but not women

Ah, but it was ever thus.

Medical research exclusively on women is a fairly recent phenomenon, beginning in earnest in the late 80s and early 90s. And now it's over.

Oh well.

by Anonymousreply 21April 24, 2025 9:35 PM

Yep SL.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 22April 24, 2025 9:46 PM

Is any of that data available in datasets, EL @ R22? You know, I used to work with data as a researcher back in the day.

But I really don't know why I'm asking. I don't even have an ancient copy of SPSS (what I usually used lo these many years ago) and I'm too lazy/old to learn R. And I hate to write code anyway (although you know I had to, way back when).

Maybe you can steer me to reports from that data for lay people -- but if not, that's OK. Thanks!

by Anonymousreply 23April 24, 2025 10:49 PM

It’s a difficult time to be a researcher or even scientist adjacent.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 24April 25, 2025 12:07 AM

Interesting, EL @ R24! I'll see if I can play around with it a bit.

by Anonymousreply 25April 25, 2025 3:04 AM

What you don’t ever want to see is an announcement from this admin that they are creating an Office of Gay Men’s Sexual Health.

Never ever. This would be really bad.

by Anonymousreply 26April 25, 2025 7:44 AM

Yay R25!

Well if that is your worry R26 you should be relieved to know they are de-funding any research having to do with gay men.

by Anonymousreply 27April 25, 2025 9:46 AM

R27 no research on gay men’s health may or may not mean more disease and mortality. More research into gay men’s sexual health and sex practice's may well lead to disease camps or similar..

Seriously keep the straight world as ignorant as possible it’s safer.

by Anonymousreply 28April 25, 2025 10:36 AM

SL potentially good news about the WHI (but DOGE lies so we’ll see.)

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 29April 25, 2025 12:02 PM

SL here’s lost NIH grants.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 30April 25, 2025 12:09 PM

Lost NSF grants

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 31April 25, 2025 12:10 PM

Damn, EL -- that's a long list. Horrible. And just to enrich these mfer's coffers! How much money do these people need, FFS?? It boggles the mind.

Perhaps I've lived too long.

by Anonymousreply 32April 25, 2025 12:26 PM

Fucking sociopaths and they just keep stealing and destroying.

(JB is the former Director of NIGMS, dollars to donuts he heard this from Panch who abruptly resigned yesterday)

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 33April 25, 2025 2:06 PM

Yes it’s bad.

But they are actually doing what countless before them have promised and tried to do and failed. But being smarter people those that failed previously got really hung up on what they were cutting and the support those programs had and even how much good those grants and contracts and programs did.

These guys are not that smart and they don’t give a fuck until things go bad then they restore what they cut. Not being that smart or informed actually helps these guys achieve their aims.

But I bet a lot of federal senior mangers have seen funding for federal grants and contracts and programs they know to be an absolute waste of time and money. So much good done by the federal health folks and so much waste and career building and empire building at the same time.

by Anonymousreply 34April 25, 2025 2:56 PM

Damn, EL -- do you work for the Feds? Is your job in danger? Every time I've gone to the VA since the inauguration I ask all the employees I have occasion to speak to if they're worried about keeping their jobs, and they all seem very certain that they won't be touched.

Frankly, to me, it would be easy to privatize many of the VA's medical functions: simply have the VA pay for any medical care veterans get outside the VA, and voila! And BTW, if the health care is pre-approved or considered an emergency, the VA already pays for it. They paid for my 10 days in the hospital after my 2016 MC accident and the next three weeks in a rehab hospital.

Privatize away!

by Anonymousreply 35April 25, 2025 3:18 PM

I don’t work for the feds, but yes on the in danger.

I’ll be fine, but the US won’t if all of our researchers have to go to China for jobs.

by Anonymousreply 36April 25, 2025 4:02 PM

Another way to look at this.

We spend millions on anti smoking research and control and elimination each year. Now trying to get a very small % of Americans to quit. ( cdc anti smoking office was just eliminated all 90 people)

Do away with all the govt smoking research and programs thus saving millions billions , we know smoking is bad, already and raise the federal tax on a pack of cigs by $10 then $20 if needed.

You could do similar , punishment not convincing, with other anti social disease causing addictions and activities that cost the US untold billions in research and programs .

Paying for other peoples addictions and fun and high risk activities is not the tax payers most fun activity. Look for more of this punishment or loss of insurance or more costly insurance in the near future. This has just begun,

Smokers Drunks Barebackers Druggies and those who favor 42 oz Big Gulps from 7/11 every morning this admin will be coming at you with punishment not asking nicely.

A new day is coming.

by Anonymousreply 37April 26, 2025 7:52 AM

I miss trolls who had a basic understanding of American grammar, idiom and where they were posting, but we can’t have everything, can we comrade?

by Anonymousreply 38April 26, 2025 10:20 AM

Are you the lesbian fleeing the country?

Or are you the lesbian who claimed on DL they got work by signing and swearing that you believed marriage was strictly between a man and a woman? A Florida thing.

It’s hard to keep posters straight here.

by Anonymousreply 39April 26, 2025 10:31 AM

I am neither of those lesbians. Who are you?

by Anonymousreply 40April 26, 2025 10:39 AM

SL I haven’t watched this yet, but FYI and I understand 60 minutes had an interview with Dr. Collins yesterday evening.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 41April 28, 2025 9:27 PM

60 minutes piece.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 42April 28, 2025 10:08 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!