Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Gladiator 2 was a flop

While the 438 million worldwide gross would be respectable for many films, Gladiator 2 cost an astounding 350 million.

by Anonymousreply 22February 21, 2025 12:25 AM

That’s why studios charge more for streaming or streaming partnership deals than in the past. Streaming is just important as BO and now factored into the profit margins from jump street.

by Anonymousreply 1January 4, 2025 4:16 PM

What R1 said. No studio really expects a movie to turn a profit purely from theatrical.

by Anonymousreply 2January 4, 2025 4:17 PM

I am the Earth Mother and it was a flop.

by Anonymousreply 3January 4, 2025 4:19 PM

No studio expects to turn a profit from theatrical, but a film is expected to hit a break even point to not be considered a flop.

For Gladiator 2, that break even point was $700 million.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 4January 4, 2025 4:25 PM

It was disastrous. Mescal is a great actor in "intimate" roles but was horribly miscast in Gladiator 2.

by Anonymousreply 5January 4, 2025 4:29 PM

R4 Yeah but movies make money after the theatrical release from rentals and streaming. Not as much as they used to but they still make money.

Something like Joker 2 is a flop. It will probably never make its money back.

by Anonymousreply 6January 4, 2025 4:31 PM

Joker 2 is a colossal flop of epic proportions. Perhaps the biggest of its kind since that Kevin Costner flick.

by Anonymousreply 7January 4, 2025 4:38 PM

Agree with r5, he was distractingly bad.

I don't know that people want to see these sweeping epic films anymore either, they're so seldomly done well. And Ridley has as many stinkers under his belt as he has hits. He's catering to an audience of years past.

by Anonymousreply 8January 4, 2025 5:04 PM

Gladiator 2 was criticized for being garish and campy, not sweeping.

by Anonymousreply 9January 4, 2025 5:06 PM

I don’t get the harsh criticism of Mescal’s performance. Or am I just Mary mistaking sexual attraction for good acting.

by Anonymousreply 10January 4, 2025 5:08 PM
Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 11January 4, 2025 5:09 PM

Gladiator 2 was awesome and I am not in the minority. It currently has an 85% on popcorn meter, that’s rotten tomatoes audience score. People who have actually seen it, really enjoyed the film.

by Anonymousreply 12January 4, 2025 5:11 PM

I personally believe he was just as good as his dad, Russel Crowe. Gladiator 1 is just a much superior film.

by Anonymousreply 13January 4, 2025 5:12 PM

Gladiator 2 was a poor imitation of the original.

The CGI baboons and the sharks were laughably bad. The plot was not good. The twin emperors were unintentionally hilarious. The was absolutely no gravitas to the movie… at all.

Paul did fine, not excellent, but fine. Denzel really stole the show except in the ludicrous finale.

Paul needs to star in a gay rom com with copious nudity.

by Anonymousreply 14January 4, 2025 5:23 PM

I watched it on New Year's Eve and fell asleep about halfway through. It just didn't engage me the way the original did. Most of it felt like a lazy remake of the original. Paul was definitely miscast; hate on Russell Crowe all you want, but he was one of the reasons the original worked.

by Anonymousreply 15January 4, 2025 7:14 PM

It looked dumb, even by today's low low standards.

by Anonymousreply 16January 4, 2025 11:41 PM

Glaaaaaaaaadiator

2

by Anonymousreply 17January 5, 2025 1:40 AM

I just watched it on streaming.

It's homophobic crap. Caters to teenage Trump fanboys.

The "twin" emperors are poorly conceived characters.

by Anonymousreply 18February 20, 2025 10:36 PM

Look at all of the disparate replies

by Anonymousreply 19February 20, 2025 10:43 PM

Caracalla was not effeminate but rather hyper-masculine. A true brute. And Caracalla and Geta, whom he killed in his mother's arm, were not twins.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 20February 20, 2025 10:57 PM

Gladiator 1 is no “Spartacus” (1960). But it hums along. Gladiator 2 is like “The Silver Chalice” (1954) – Paul Newman’s film debut.

by Anonymousreply 21February 20, 2025 11:42 PM

Gladiator II was a huge disappointment.

by Anonymousreply 22February 21, 2025 12:25 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!