Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

The Victorian tradition of post-mortem photography

I've always thought this tradition was fascinating ever since I learned of it, though it was fairly short-lived and did not last as a cultural norm. It was a semi-common practice in the US and England with the advent of photography and daguerreotypes. I came across one of these portraits in real life at an antique shop once. It was of a dead infant girl, in a frame with notations on the back that had the name, location of death, and date. Macabre? I suppose so, but this specific photograph really looked just like a sleeping child. I found it strangely beautiful, and it kind of made me sad that there were no descendants of the family to keep it and that it instead ended up in some random antique mall.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 7November 30, 2024 5:11 AM

Somewhat haunting, those images of the sleeping passed child.

by Anonymousreply 1November 30, 2024 4:10 AM

R1 when you look at the history of these photos and the ones that have been preserved, it really does paint a picture just how often children died in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. It seems that most of these photos that were taken were of children and infants. Child death and mothers dying during birth were both a sad normality. The development of medicine, sanitation, access to clean water, etc. really did change things.

by Anonymousreply 2November 30, 2024 4:15 AM

Post-mortem photography was a major plot point in that Nicole Kidman film, “The Others.”

by Anonymousreply 3November 30, 2024 4:16 AM

R2 here, meant late 19th through early 20th—obviously children dying was common before that too, but photography did not exist so it wasn't documented in images.

by Anonymousreply 4November 30, 2024 4:17 AM

Personally, I don't find it strange or morbid at all. My own family did. I've seen many photos of my dead relatives in their casket.

Here's the one of Queen Victoria. Did they take one of Elizabeth?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 5November 30, 2024 4:54 AM

In the mid 80s I was helping my grandmother clean out her apartment. In a drawer we found a small book of photos - the roll of shots had been bound after processing, with a perforated edge - so you could remove individual photos.

All the pictures were of her mother, laid out in her casket, that had been taken in 1954. My grandmother said “We used to do that, I don’t know why,” as she threw the pictures in the trash.

by Anonymousreply 6November 30, 2024 4:55 AM

I've seen photographs of children posed after they died. They looked so eerily alive and dead at the same time. Their eyes were open, too. Yes, that movie The Others captured the mood of that time. I'll never forget realizing that they were dead.

by Anonymousreply 7November 30, 2024 5:11 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!