Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Let's Talk About "Pearl" (2022)

This is the prequel to the dreadful "X," which tells the story of how the old lady in the farmhouse who killed all the porn actors came to be such a homicidal maniac.

I wasn't crazy about Mia Goth in "X," but she really shines in this one. The movie is a slow burn, walking the fine line between black comedy and horror, but it kept my attention. And we need to talk a lot more about the gorgeous David Corenswet, who plays the sexy, but slightly perverted theater movie projectionist. It was a shame we never got to see him naked in this one.

What do you DLrs think about "Pearl?" And have you seen the "MaXXXine," the sequel to "X?"

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 24November 16, 2024 6:15 AM

David Corenswet in "Pearl." He can spool my film thread anytime.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 1November 11, 2024 2:58 PM

X was better. The porn scenes were hot.

by Anonymousreply 2November 11, 2024 3:06 PM

Let's talk about that brilliant monologue of hers.

by Anonymousreply 3November 11, 2024 3:08 PM

R2 I'm friends with an actual porn actor from the 1970s, the time period that "X" takes place in.

I asked him about the movie and if it was an accurate depiction of how porn was made in the 1970s. He laughed out loud and said the movie got everything wrong.

by Anonymousreply 4November 11, 2024 3:09 PM

R3 That really was amazing. And afterward, the reaction from the sister-in-law: "Well, I guess I better be going now."

by Anonymousreply 5November 11, 2024 3:09 PM

[quote]He laughed out loud and said the movie got everything wrong.

It's a horror movie, not a documentary.

by Anonymousreply 6November 11, 2024 3:14 PM

R6 But if you're going to tell a story about making porn in the 1970s, it should be grounded in some semblance of accuracy.

by Anonymousreply 7November 11, 2024 3:15 PM

[quote]But if you're going to tell a story about making porn in the 1970s, it should be grounded in some semblance of accuracy.

It wasn't *about* making porn in the '70s, r6, that was just the setting. Again, it wasn't a documentary.

by Anonymousreply 8November 11, 2024 3:23 PM

R8 The plot of the movie involves a group of folks who go to Texas to make porn. The majority of the film is scenes about making porn.

by Anonymousreply 9November 11, 2024 3:25 PM

Have it your way, r9.

by Anonymousreply 10November 11, 2024 3:34 PM

The one thing that seemed incongruous in the movie was Pearl's obsession to go to Hollywood and be a movie star. The movie takes place in 1918. Was Hollywood really that big of a deal in 1918? I always thought the myth of Hollywood and becoming a star was ushered in long after WWI.

by Anonymousreply 11November 11, 2024 4:03 PM

I've seen all three. Nothing unnerved me more than the first alligator scene. I thought she was crazy for jumping into a random pond in the south. Pearl was very creative with a couple laughs thrown in and MaXXXine was fine.

by Anonymousreply 12November 11, 2024 4:18 PM

"Pearl" is an interesting character study shot to look like an old Hollywood film. I liked it, especially the monologue that Mia Goth absolutely kills. But it doesn't have the same momentum and energy as "X."

"MaXXXine" was ... not good. It had its moments, and I understood what it was going for, but a lot of it felt underdeveloped.

by Anonymousreply 13November 11, 2024 4:34 PM

[quote]"MaXXXine" was ... not good. It had its moments, and I understood what it was going for, but a lot of it felt underdeveloped.

Totally agree, r13.

by Anonymousreply 14November 11, 2024 4:44 PM

R11 Hollywood began producing films in 1911. By 1918 there would've been over 20 companies in California producing films. So it's not much of a stretch that Pearl would latch onto what was seen as a gimmicky fad at the time as a desperate means to escape the farm for a much better life.

by Anonymousreply 15November 11, 2024 4:48 PM

Zzzzzzz.

by Anonymousreply 16November 11, 2024 5:33 PM

"Pearl" was the best of the three, though I thought "X" was very good and "MaXXXine" was worth watching for its grimy grindhouse feel and great use of music.

If David Lynch had ever riffed on "The Wizard of Oz" I imagine it would have looked something like "Pearl."

by Anonymousreply 17November 11, 2024 5:56 PM

It's my head canon that Maxine is Pearl's grand daughter. In the monologue Pearl says she had a baby that died but her mom knew Pearl was crazy so she could have had it taken away and adopted out.

by Anonymousreply 18November 11, 2024 6:03 PM

R17 I liked that they made Pearl look like Miss Gulch from The Wizard of Oz whenever she was shown riding her bicycle.

by Anonymousreply 19November 11, 2024 6:41 PM

R18 Howard must've gotten Pearl pregnant around 15-18. Maxine's father is kind of old looking in X. But then again Maxine looks a lot younger than her actual age since she's around 35 by the third film and seen dancing as a little girl in a home movie filmed in the mid-late 1950's. If that were true Pearl most likely would've been her maternal grandmother.

by Anonymousreply 20November 12, 2024 8:09 PM

Maxine was born in 1952. Pearl's child would have been around 35 so it's possible.

by Anonymousreply 21November 16, 2024 6:00 AM

"X" and "Pearl" are easily in my top 10 favorite horror movies of the last decade. I really wanted to love "MaXXXine" and I liked elements of it, but it felt like it was seriously lacking in terms of themes and subtext, which both the other films had (and which is partly what made them interesting). "MaXXXine" ultimately felt kind of hollow to me.

That said, I enjoy the trilogy overall because you get roughly a century's worth of visual aesthetics packed into three films. Each movie is a distinct time capsule of its own. I do think "Pearl" is the saddest and darkest film of the three, despite its Douglas Sirk color overload and sunny farm setting. It's a sad story and there are elements of the character (psychosis/murderous impulses aside) that I think any outsider can identify with.

by Anonymousreply 22November 16, 2024 6:10 AM

Mia Goth in Pearl, crazy smile-crying through the end credits.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 23November 16, 2024 6:10 AM

^^ That was Mia's horror movie tribute to Timothée's crying over the end credits in Call Me By Your Name.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 24November 16, 2024 6:15 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!